Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Odds On Peyton Manning's Next Home Includes Three Teams

god god damn it damn it

I hate the "season is over" talk, but - crap. If we can be made to look this bad against the Lions at home, who are we expecting to beat?

Charles Tillman, Lance Briggs, and Devin Hester are the only people on the team that consistently look like they're professional football players who expect that they can win. Everyone else is tentative and sloppy and half-asleep. Urlacher looks tired and depressed, like he's never gotten over the Grossman era, where any big plays his defense might make bought them a forty-five second respite before they were back on the field. He still makes the faces but he's got the look in his eyes of a dog that's been bred too many times, the constant look of exhaustion and annoyance at something that's supposed to be fun.

And Griese? I don't know what happened to that guy. Where the hell was that confident arm that took short gains the past few games? Why on earth was he trying to force big touchdowns and getting intercepted three times in the damn end zone? I kept expecting him to pull of a mask, Scooby Doo-villain style, and reveal that it was secretly Rex Grossman all along. Good Brian/Bad Brian? Say it ain't so.

The good news is that our schedule is pretty light from here on out, excepting the Giants. If somehow the bye week and getting healthy can make a difference, we'll know soon. If it doesn't, I'm pretty much of the opinion that you start Kyle Orton and see if he's got any juice so we can plan for the future at quarterback - obviously you can't build a franchise around Griese. Maybe we can start Orton on defense, too - he couldn't be any worse than McBride, right? Get him in as the short-man on kick returns too, really ramp up the triple-threat...

What else can you say? Has Brad Maynard got any experience at quarterback? He always seems so collected and calm under pressure, and he never fails to deliver in his current role. Anyone have Chris Leak's number? Or Ryan Leaf's? What about hijacking a bunch of South African rugby players and starting them as the offensive line? It's possible that the problem is that we're just not thinking creatively enough. The Brian Griese Cinderella story played out much better last year with Jeff Garcia, and nobody likes a cliche. Is there anything in the NFL rulebook about getting a silverback gorilla in a Bears helmet and jersey and playing him at fullback? Jason McKie's an underused bright spot on the offense, but I'm willing to bet he can't ward off tacklers like a real live gorilla. With a bit of luck, Ron Turner would antagonize him with some peanuts and the ape would rip his arms off. There's no way this can go wrong!

See, you've got to have hope, because this was just ugly. There were fits and starts of promise, but we're halfway through the season and promise means nothing - at some point you have to accept that Brian Griese isn't a starting quarterback, that Cedric Benson doesn't really want to be in the NFL at all, that the offensive line is too old to hold up, that the defense doesn't expect to win games anymore, that the receivers can hardly hold on to the ball, that the reason Devin Hester is the only person on the team anyone talks about is that he's the only player worth talking about right now.

3-5. Well, hell - it's the NFC, anything can happen. All it'll take is for us to, you know, win consecutively. The season ain't over, but it's sure as hell going to take a team that plays like winners to keep from being big, big losers.

Comment 13 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

a team this bad
there is no "light" schedule when you are this bad. there is not a team in the league that I am confident the bears could beat.

by mike b on Oct 28, 2007 5:05 PM CDT reply actions  

Yow.
Geez, I hope you're not right. Would we be a punching bag for Miami? Could we make St Louis look good?

A "light" schedule is a good thing because, you know, if we were up against Indianapolis, Dallas, and New England for our next three games, there'd be no way to tell how serious it was - most teams look bad against a powerhouse, so a loss would be less likely to teach us all that much. If we stomp Oakland, meanwhile, it may not mean that the Bears are back and we can start doing the Superbowl Shuffle, but it's one for the W column. If we're made to look like rusty amateurs, we can safely write off the rest of the season and start considering very seriously what we intend to do in the future. If Benson looks bad against a top-tier defense, there are excuses - if he looks bad against a weak team then they'll sound even more hollow than usual, and we might see some progress.

If we lose any of the next three games, we can count ourselves out and make some bold moves, like turning the keys over to Orton in an attempt to consider him for next year. Having a "light" schedule means we either get some wins, or we can stop hearing the excuses - either one is a good thing, as far as I'm concerned.

by itsugly on Oct 28, 2007 6:48 PM CDT up reply actions  

um
miami played pretty good today, much better than the bears. their main problem has been injuries and issues of continuity, hard to get anything going when there are new guys in the starting lineup every week. st louis' main problems have also been injuries and they played pretty well today. i'm sadly more confident in our ability to beat st louis than i am in our ability to beat miami. miami held a pretty high scoring offense in check today and i think they could probably hold us to 3-7 points.

by lopey986 on Oct 28, 2007 9:58 PM CDT up reply actions  

what
has mcbride done wrong?

by Jbasic89 on Oct 28, 2007 5:07 PM CDT reply actions  

Honestly?
He doesn't sign his checks "Nathan Vasher". It's not fair, I know, but who says we have to be fair?

McBride had a good game against Philadelphia, but he's playing like what he is - a rookie who shouldn't be starting. To be certain, I do not think that Kyle Orton would be a better starting cornerback, but I do certainly feel Vasher's absence strongly when I see #26 on the field. He's on a tough road - when the defense is playing this poorly, it's hard not to look at what's different and cast blame in the direction of the new faces (see also: Bob Babich), but I don't honestly blame McBride for his mistakes anymore than I blame, say, Hester for lining up in the wrong place in Philly, or Orton for being unspectacular in 2005. Players without much experience who are thrust into high-profile positions and expected to play like veterans rarely do, and to anticipate otherwise is to set yourself up for disappointment.

by itsugly on Oct 28, 2007 6:55 PM CDT up reply actions  

Briggs
The sad thing is, our best defensive player right now will be gone next year.  I think we should trade Urlacher while he still has some value, and I can't believe I just said that.  But he obviously isn't the same and he's 30.  It doesn't look good that the Bears are downplaying Urlacher's injury and he's not downplaying it.  We're in trouble.  
GO BEARS!!!!!

by McRipper on Oct 29, 2007 11:45 AM CDT reply actions  

I hope not.
You think Briggs is really lost after this season? It may be blind hope talking, but I want to believe that we can afford to keep him with Grossman out of the picture and Berrian not proving himself to be worth a huge raise.

Without Briggs, we're in big, big trouble. I hate to agree with you on trading Urlacher, but if we've seen the level he'll be playing at in the future, we can't count on him to do everything we have in the past.

--d

by itsugly on Oct 29, 2007 3:00 PM CDT up reply actions  

Briggs
has not looked sharp the past two games.  I'm not sure what y'all are smoking, but Urlacher has outplayed him by far the past two games.  Briggs has missed many tackles.  

by mikebdot on Oct 29, 2007 3:36 PM CDT up reply actions  

best defensive player?
is still tommie harris, even if the guy isn't 100% he is more of a force at defensive tackle then i've ever seen.

by lopey986 on Oct 30, 2007 12:44 PM CDT up reply actions  

How?
Tommie Harris?  What has that guy done to deserve such an accolade?  Our run defense sucks.  If he's the anchor on the line, then the blame should start with him.  He's not better than Jamal Williams, or Pat and Kevin Williams from the Vikings.  Those guys are forces at the DT position.  They do what a DT is supposed to do, clog the running lanes.  Our Dline is more worried about getting up field after the QB, than stopping the run.  The Packers, worst running game in the league, ran all over us when we played them.  Briggs and Tillman are the only ones playing at a Pro Bowl level this year.
GO BEARS!!!!!

by McRipper on Oct 30, 2007 3:01 PM CDT up reply actions  

If it matters to you...
...that's what the Bears' D-line is supposed to do.

by tyger1147 on Oct 30, 2007 10:05 PM CDT up reply actions  

It does matter
The dline is supposed to do more than just pressure the QB.  You can't be in a pass rush on every down.  I know that the Cover 2 works great when you get pressure on the QB, but you have to stop the run also.  The dline is making it easy on the oline by always pass rushing.  The Bears are ranked 26th against the run and 24th against the pass.  Not very good for a team that prides itself on defense.
GO BEARS!!!!!

by McRipper on Oct 31, 2007 8:59 AM CDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Windy City Gridiron is the best independent site on the internet for breaking news, in-depth analysis, and hardcore discussion about the Chicago Bears

Community Guidelines

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Windycity_small Adam T

189886_210123485665309_100000029768895_888721_5830650_n__1__small Dane Noble

Editors

Sackwatchcutler_small Lester A. Wiltfong Jr.

Orange_shy_guy_small Steven Schweickert

Capture_small Kev H

Contributing Writers

Lincoln_small Sam Householder

Leprechaun_small Spongie

Polishsausage_small Steve Ronkowski

Cat_bonnet_small Pete Dixon

Icothgmts_small T.J. Shouse