The Day After
A not so good night of sleep later and I am ready to reflect on the game and not break out into any Colt front runner fans, granted if anybody at my work shows up with Colts gear, I reserve the right to recant that pledge.
I am going to start with out offense or our lack of offense. It is harder to look at the D, when the time of possession was 32-10 at one point, you know they were sucking wind.
Quarterback- Rex played pretty much the perfect game the first quarter based on what they asked him to do. His stats were something like 6/8, 63 yards, 1TD, 0INT for a 120.7 passer rating. Things went horribly awry in the second half and while not all of it was his fault some does lay on him. His two interception I don't know if they were his first read, but he just lobbed the ball. Berrian and two Colts secondary were just sitting there waiting for a jump off. He also hosed up two snaps.
Running Backs- I have no problem with the running backs. Benson went out early and Jones ran hard. Both Benson and Jones had a fumble.
Wide Receivers- A bit harder to say how they were. It seemed they didn't get any separation. Berrian should have been able to burn by their secondary a few times. Desmond Clark was no where in the first 3 quarters, then he shows up for a number of plays and then butterfingers a 4th down catch.
O-Line: Thomas Jones had a 100 yard game, so they blocked alright, but their misses were just at the worst times. A costly holding call, two jail breaks on Grossman on a good drive.
Ron Turner- Generally, I don't think about paying attention to play calling. I just wath the game and see what happens, but even I couldn't figure out what we were doing. Throwing on first, running on 3rd and long. Why did it take us until the 4th quarter to start finding Clark in the middle? Don't we also know that is the week spot in the Cover-2; although, I think the Colts played a lot of zone, it was still open.
One final think I want to ran on and it isn't game related. The Super Bowl is the single biggest TV event of the year. So the CBS pre game show starts off with JB doing a plug for Pizza Hut. What the hell were they thinking?
18 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
D-line
D-Line
by mike @ Windy City Gridiron on Feb 5, 2007 8:46 AM CST reply actions
I hate to say it
turner really called a stinker
We
Overall though, we should have blitzed more and more creatively. Tillman and Vasher were playing well (especially Tillman, he had a GREAT game).
However, my personal feeling is that we lost the game when the ColorMan (I forget his name, as he was forgettable) informed the viewing audience that Nathan Vasher wants to marry Oprah Winfrey. And it wasn't a joke.
by cookding @ Windy City Gridiron on Feb 5, 2007 9:42 AM CST reply actions
I posted my analysis of the game
Why a plug for Pizza Hut? Because they PAID for it! Why do you think it was there? The network sold every inch of the screen could sell.
At the very beginning of the pre-game coverage -- "Updates?" ("Yes, I'm here at the team hotel. They are eating.") Even one of these poor slobs who got this shitty assignment said, in so many words..'nothing new to report here.' What a friggin joke' that was.
Then, of course, it's the CBS pre-game team which stinks, (JB is the best of the bunch, and doesn't belong with those arrogant, full-of-themselves ex-jocks) but you couldn't get a shot of any of them with those flat-screen monitors behind them touting another sponsor. (Also, one unamed marble-mouthed member of the quartet talks WAAY too fast, and I can't even figure out what he's saying half the time. (Would he be insulted if somebody on the production team would ASK him to slow down his delivery? Just a bit?)
I was hoping Terry Bradshaw and Howie Long would stop by and interrupt this pitiful performance. (I can't believe I'm actually saying this.)
How did Jim Nance jump to the top of the heap of CBS sportscasters? He's competent in College Basketball, but he was pretty damn boring yesterday, as was Phil Simms. (Did they Give Greg Gumbel the weekend off? Why wasn't he calling the game?)
I was actually pining for a Fox telecast -- perhaps that would pumped some life into this bland, whitebread coverage.
Even the overblown Al Michaels and John Madden would have been a relief.
The commercials sucked. Every friggin' one of them -- and I can't even count the K-Fed spot for Nationwide, because the damn spot had been aired all week. Only the CBS promo, (not a commercial) for Letterman with Oprah was clever, original, and funny) If I'm Coca-Cola, I FIRE my ad agency today. God, did those spots stink. Budweiser wasn't much more creative. (Perhaps the Clydesdale spot was their only shining moment)
And isn't it telling when we humanize a 'machine' that works the assembly line. Hey, Ford -- I remember when actual HUMANS worked those lines, and made good money and were a part of the American middle class. I'll bet the viewers in Flint, Michigan thought that spot was a knockout.
Good luck with that 92 billion dollar loss this year.
In my view, this was the worst TV coverage of a Super Bowl in the game's history. (Even had the Bears WON, I'd have the same opinion.) Right down to the dated theme music, CBS Sports thinks it's 1987.
by San Diego Smooth Jazz Man on Feb 5, 2007 10:57 AM CST reply actions
ironic
I thought it was a PSA
by thecubreporter on Feb 5, 2007 5:37 PM CST up reply actions
Not if that's what the Sales Dept tells you
As I said earlier, the omnipresent monitors behind every one of the talking heads was visually distracting, and annoying. (That, was worse, to my taste because there was no way to avoid looking at the sponsor) Damn CBS might have well have sold a continious sponsor 'crawl' at the bottom of the screen:
"It's xx minutes to kick off...this a service of Ford......It's xx minutes and 30 seconds to kick off....brought to you by Snickers....and on and on and on...."
by San Diego Smooth Jazz Man on Feb 5, 2007 11:32 AM CST reply actions
Boot Grossman and Lovie
If Grossman is the future forget it. Same with Lovie.
With that much talent Bears can't depend on these two.
Turner is no bargin either.
Reinsdorf did it with Collins and the Bulls started winning championships.
by stic on Feb 5, 2007 12:11 PM CST reply actions
h.......
ha.
by cookding @ Windy City Gridiron on Feb 5, 2007 12:21 PM CST up reply actions
Replacements
by mike @ Windy City Gridiron on Feb 5, 2007 1:12 PM CST up reply actions
You are ignorant...
These players admire and respect Lovie. If he loses the team then you can let him go, until then, he's the coach.
by Chad @ Windy City Gridiron on Feb 5, 2007 1:13 PM CST up reply actions
I'm with you
If any of you don't like it then piss on you!
by Bear z Fan on Feb 5, 2007 2:53 PM CST up reply actions
Yea...
Lovie Smith must be a pathetic coach that he lost in the Super Bowl.
Question
Replacements
Who are you replacements in this scenario?
I'm not agreeing or disagreeing. I'm just assuming that if you want Lovie run out of town along with Rex, you have alternatives in mind and I am curious as to who they are.
by mike @ Windy City Gridiron on Feb 5, 2007 4:21 PM CST up reply actions

by 




















