Keyshawn to Bears?

by Zachariah on May 2, 2007 5:50 PM CDT Comment 15 comments

Very interesting thing developed for Keyshawn over the weekend and had to pretty much publicly be cordial to the guy that just took his job. More of that over on Deadspin.
http://deadspin.com/sports/how-do-you-feel-now-that-you.ve-taken-my-job%3F/keyshawns-final-moments-a s-a-panther-257079.php

But hypothetically speaking would a guy like keyshawn be a good fit for the Bears offense, another quality ball control type receiver with size could never hurt? could it?

0 recs | Comment 15 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

i'd take him.

by Chad on May 2, 2007 7:27 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs

For the right price...

...it's intriguing. But I think one is enough. Other than Moose the Bears have a lot of play-makers.

If Moose wasn't around, I'd say definitely. As is... probably not.

by tyger1147 on May 2, 2007 7:52 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs

in a second

by Adam T on May 2, 2007 7:53 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs

experienced receivers

you can never have too many.

by mike b on May 2, 2007 9:26 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs

but you can have one too many nutcases

Keyshawn's a whiny bitch and not nearly as talented as T.O. or Moss to get away with it...pass

Visit The Cub Reporter (mvn.com/mlb-cubs)

by thecubreporter on May 3, 2007 12:20 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

I think he's a different player now.

He used to be a superstar and realized that he was a flashlight. I think he'll be a standup guy now.

by Chad on May 3, 2007 1:40 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

never heard a word out of him

after he got cut. but i agree he's not the typical bear.

by mike b on May 3, 2007 7:52 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

Giants looking at him

to replace Toomer. If we were losing Moose, I could see that move, otherwise, not so much.

by RME JICO on May 3, 2007 8:35 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

The last thing we need...

is another #3 receiver. IMO, we've got two #2's (Berrian and Muhammed) and a roster of #3's.

by shawndgoldman on May 3, 2007 9:31 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs

Keyshawn

I was under the impression that he was similiar to Moose. I don't think we really need two Moose's (or whatever the hell the plural of moose would be)

first the Rush...now the Bears.

by mike on May 3, 2007 11:43 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs

its just moose

by mike b on May 3, 2007 12:48 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

Are you sure?

I think it's Meese.

by Chad on May 3, 2007 1:23 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

Receivers are made by their QB's

bring in Monk and Rice in their primes if you want, won't matter if Rex doesn't step up his game this year.

I'm fine with our receiving corps, Moose, Berrian, Bradley and Davis are a good mix. I think Hester will get some more shots this year as well.

Visit The Cub Reporter (mvn.com/mlb-cubs)

by thecubreporter on May 3, 2007 1:09 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs

A great WR only becomes a hall of famer and record setting when he has a good qb, but great WRs will always be great wide receivers. If you put 1988 Jerry Rice on last years Bear's team, Rice still puts up 1000 yards.

by Chad on May 3, 2007 1:26 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs