Windy City Gridiron: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: Sounder At Heart for Seattle Sounders Fans!

Chicago Bears get bittersweet win over Indianapolis Colts.

Hello my friends,

Chicago Bears 0 17 10 0
Indianapolis Colts 0 17 0 7
Game Thread


Well we won the game which is a good thing or bad thing depending on how you view the pre-season.  It is really hard to be dogmatic on how a team will fare throughout the year based on the pre-season, but I will try to make some observations.  

I was impressed with how our offense was performing at first.  We were driving and as WCG noted we will miss Jones breakaway speed, but Benson is proving himself serviceable to us.  He is running and hitting 2-4 yards at a time, but he is looking so versatile with his ability to receive passes.  He didn't finish with flashy stats (10 carries for 24 yards averaging 2.4 and his longest being 6), but  I really like the dimension that Benson brings to the offense I think that as he gets more comfortable he will get even better.

Our offense was balanced and the running and passing game was moving along.  I am excited to see Berrian getting passes in different contexts (27 from Grossman and a TD from Griese), he finished with 4 receptions for 49 yards averaging 12.3 a catch.  In the second series all we saw was Benson with a 3 yard catch and a 2 yard run before the INT.  Now, regarding Grossman getting stripped, I really don't fault him for that.  If you saw the play Mathis really made a good reach and poked it out.  Grossman couldn't see it coming.  It came from Fred Miller's side and I think he should have been better protected.  As I was talking about the play with my dad and how happy I was to see Adewale Ogunleye sack Manning and then Grossman threw the pick.  It was an obvious misread coupled with a throw that Grossman tried to force in there (he later admitted to forcing it).  In my opinion he really can't be held completely at fault for the strip, but he needs to be more careful and stop trying to force balls in there, especially on a drag route across the middle where it is easy for defenders to jump a route.  He has to show more discernment there.  

Star-divide

Coming off the INT the Colts had great position to make a first strike, and Manning looked poised to make a statement after he threaded in a pass to Harrison in between Tillman and Urlacher.  On the following three plays they ran the ball for 1 yard and Briggs made a clutch stop.  The following two plays were stopped by Adewale and the final attempt on 4th and 1 by manning was broken up by my guy Hunter Hillenmeyer at the goal line.  I know that the offense had a rough start, but after those woes we had a good show by the Special Teams and our Defense.  I loved the goal line stand, and I am really becoming impressed with how Ogunleye is making his presence felt on the field.  I know it is limited play, but he had a big sack and two stops in a critical situation.

Following that great defensive stand we saw the offensive falter again.  Benson was doing his job at that point age getting yards, but 3 yards at a time won't always cut it.  Grossman didn't help anymore with his frightening repeat of his mistakes from the Superbowl (again I will address later).  Following this forsaken drive we punted and watched Manning march his team to the endzone by the first play of the second quarter.  There will be times when Peyton is on and can't really be stopped with his passing abilities and weapons to chose from, but I wasn't too happy with the defense allowing Addai to walk into the endzone.  I really can't infer to much from it, for all I know they were upset that they had  to be back out there again and just wanted to get off the field.  I don't expect it to be a big problem.

At this point in the game Manning put on the sideline hat and didn't come back in.  The Bears left Grossman and the starters it, in my opinion, to give him a chance to gain some confidence after his ill-fated first quarter performance.  Before that however, the Colts almost pulled a fast one on us with the fake onside and, ohh boy was that a near perfect storm.  They placed that ball in the perfect position, and Giordano was just a little bit off in getting the ball.  Following that trick they kicked the ball directly to D. Manning, and apparently Hester is rubbing off on some of the other players because Manning bolted for a 72 yard return ensuring a FG for the team if nothing else.  The offense couldn't get anything done and settled for a FG from Gould.

Following the FG our defense looked possessed the way they were breaking through the Colts O line for a behind the line tackle of the RB and a loss of 3 yards  by Ogunleye and Darwin Walker.  After that Idonije and Garay teamed up for a sack and introduced Jim Sorgi to the turf for a loss of 6 yards.

After that Hester lined up for punt reception (I like him in this role) and I said out loud "wouldn't it be funny if they kicked it to him after Manning's return," but they did.  Had it not been for Hester going so fast that he tripped over the legs of his blocker (I believe it was Brandon Rideau) a spectacular 50 yard return would have been a spectacular 74 yard TD return, but we can't complain too much now can we.

On the next offensive series Grossman went to Jason McKie for 4 yards and then the other side to Berrian for the first.  Then we got a great break when the Colts committed Passer Interference on Muhammad, and that play brought us to the one.  However then we saw another dropped snap by Grossman (or at least some did, my ESPN connection cut out right before the play and didn't come back on until everyone was piled on the ball.  I didn't get to see what happened), but he soon redeemed himself with the sneak on the next play.

Aside from the mis-snap our Offense got it done.  After that our ST made a great play when Ricky Manning Jr. stripped the Colts return man and Mike Hass recovered the ball to put us in great position again.  The second team came out and got it done in four plays.  Brian Griese continues to give the talking head something to talk about with his play hitting Devin Hester for a 13 yard strike and setting up a picture perfect pass to Berrian in between two Colt defenders for the TD.  I really like the play of our receivers as of late and I think that Hester is going to be a big addition for us, and this is before we see them blow the lid off of the secret Hester playbook that is locked up in Halas Hall.

All in all, we wrapped up the game at that point and never really looked back.  Aside from what we saw from the first team Garrett Wolfe continues to show some flashes while throwing up a serviceable 3.5 average while running 8 for 28.  He had one impressive run for 14 yards, and it seems that Wolfe and Hester will provide break away speed for the offense coming out of the backfield.  John Gilmore made two catches for 9 yards each.  I have really liked this guy since last year and I like his ability to get his hands on the ball.  

The only real battle for a roster spot is happening on the offense in between Brandon Rideau and Mike Hass to act as a ST guy and 6th receiver.  It was obvious that they were trying to get both guys the ball towards the end of the game.  They both made great catches with Rideau grabbing 2 for 44 yards, and Mike Hass getting 2 for 48.  I can't imagine how hard it is to pick in between the two guys as they both play well and appear to have bright futures ahead of them.  If a gun was held to my head I would give the nod to Hass.  He made an AMAZING catch over a defender that was deflected for a solid gain and had the heads up fumble recovery in the first quarter.  He seems to be a play maker and a team can never have too many of those.  Aside from the performance Rideau did something to his ankle in the third quarter.  The Bears staff is being mum about the extent of it, but there is a chance it could affect his status with the team.

In other rookie news, Dan Bazuin made his first appearance as a bear and recorded 3 tackles.  Didn't see anything special from him, but I am glad that he is getting valuable playing time and making tackles. Michael Okwo played and made one tackle and  really didn't show us much.  Trumaine McBride didn't play in the game apparently he is nursing his ankle or was just given rest.  5th round picks Corey Graham and Kevin Payne made interceptions with Payne having the more impressive of the two.  I am very happy to see them making plays as I know Chris Harris was traded because of their elevated play in camp.  I give kudos to Jerry Angelo for appearing to pick good guys in the late rounds yet again.

Mark Bradely sat out this week and Tommie Harris was again rested.  The Harris thing somewhat concerns me because he has been so adamant in interviews about being 100%.  Granted, this could just be the coaching staff taking precautions and giving him more time before his debut with this years squad, but I really want him to get some time under his belt before our first game against the Chargers, we NEED him for that game and for the season in general.  I think he is fine and confident, but that the coaching staff is just being extra careful.

All in all it was a bittersweet game.  I was thrilled and excited to watch the defense and the ST, and even with the offensive I was excited some, but I wasn't too happy with the overall performance.  I love Rex and I have defended him before, but he made another mental error in trying to force a ball in and just messed up the snaps.  In his interview he said that he tried to force the ball in and I respect him for saying that.  However, with the snaps he blamed them on a misread of the count (stupid, but ok), and then he blamed the second for sweat being on his hand.  Listen I know that this stuff happens but I would have rather him said that he made a mistake and needs to fix it and not blame it on sweaty hands.  I was way more disappointed in his response then I was with his performance on the field.  I think that he will bounce back from this just fine and I would rather it happen in the pre-season, but I just don't want him making excuses.  That is all that I ask.

Overall I am happy to see the team play and win, even if it is in the pre-season.  I get absolutely jacked up when I see our ST and Defense make plays and I expect them to every time I watch.  I can only hope that in the next couple of weeks I come to expect the same from our Offense.  Finally, don't throw Rex under the bus yet, its just the pre-season.

0 recs  |  Comment 23 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Isn't that actually what he said?
In his interview he said that he tried to force the ball in and I respect him for saying that.  However, with the snaps he blamed them on a misread of the count (stupid, but ok), and then he blamed the second for sweat being on his hand.  Listen I know that this stuff happens but I would have rather him said that he made a mistake and needs to fix it and not blame it on sweaty hands.  I was way more disappointed in his response then I was with his performance on the field.

Even though he explained exactly what happened, didn't he say there are no excuses and they'll work on it as soon as they get back to practice?

The interception was bad, but from what I saw he took what they gave him for the most part without forcing much (besides that one pass). The first fumble would have happened to any QB, it was just a great defensive play.

It's preseason, whatever. The first goal line stand was nice by our D. Dvoracek blew up the 4th down play at the line.

Visit The Cub Reporter (mvn.com/mlb-cubs)

by thecubreporter on Aug 21, 2007 1:27 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

He did say he will work on it,
But I wish that is all he would have said. I mean come on everybody has sweaty hands in the NFL.  Furthermore, he has to get the ball from center, that is his most basic job as a QB.

Aside from that he had a good game and the INT even dosen't bother me so much. I love the guy regardless  but I just really don't want to hear excuses like my hands were sweaty. That's all.

by South Side Irish on Aug 21, 2007 2:06 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Quick suggestion...
When posting these on the front page, use the "extended copy" feature. Put some sort of teasing paragraph, or graphic or small "box score" or something, in the "Intro Copy" box... And then put everything else in the "Extended Copy" box. There's no way I want to scroll down this far to view what comments might be left for previous WCG main posts.

by tyger1147 on Aug 21, 2007 3:56 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Dang, my bad
Didn't know you could do that. Sorry for being a noob.

by South Side Irish on Aug 21, 2007 5:20 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Fixed it
Is that what you had in mind? Thanks for the tip.

by South Side Irish on Aug 21, 2007 5:22 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Huh
I watch football, figured I understood the basics, thought I'd start reading sports blogs. Unfortunately, I have no idea what you're talking about half the time. Looks like I have a lot to learn.

by jennynewbie on Aug 21, 2007 1:32 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I defended Grossman
a lot last year, and thought the offseason would be what he needed to fix these mental miscues. i also raised some questions about how many of these problems, STILL present at this age, would ever go away.

The first time he fumbles a snap in the regular season I want him out, unless it occurs in week 5+. There is no excuse for it, he should have learned it by age 18 let alone 26 (27 tomorrow).

Our non NFC North schedule is too hard for him to not play well. With him playing like he did last year, unless the highs and lows work out perfectly, we will not be a .500 team. Even with a game managing quarterback, I have a hard time assuming the defense and st will pick us up as huge as they did last year, making it even more important that the offense produce. Does anyone feel right now that this offense can bring us back down 14 against a decent-good team. (Not a real fair question, they haven't showed us much yet, but with Grossman dropping snaps and fucking up reads it won't matter if you have Payton in the backfield with Rice and Irvin split wide.)

If he shows little to no in game improvement I want him pulled and let griese get the time he needs to find a rhythm. I am sick of potential, I want to take advantage of this window. Hopefully you win the super bowl and along the way see if Orton is an option, if not you draft a new qb and let griese/ orton run the show for the next year.

by mike b on Aug 22, 2007 10:23 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I might hate Rex more than anyone
on this site, but I still think this is a 12-win team, minimum, even with Captain Suck at QB.

by Santos Sorrow on Aug 22, 2007 7:32 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

mr. optimistic
i don't see hester being as big a factor this year, can't imagine teams will keep kicking to him and his fumbling make me think his offensive contribution will be null overall.

all these shiny o weapons are useless if he sucks.

by mike b on Aug 22, 2007 8:44 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

You have to understand, though...
...the defense might be better than last year. If it stays healthy all year, it certainly is. I just can't see the team losing two of its three best players for the rest of year again. And if anyone other than Urlacher, Harris or Brown go down, I think they easily have the pieces to replace one or two without skipping a beat.

Special teams might be an issue, but supposedly Gould and Maynard are both healthier, and they are the biggest components of a special teams. I think the rest will take care of itself by the midway point.

In my opinion, the Bears turning into an elite team rests on the shoulders of Rex Grossman. The team staying among the best (11/12 wins) rests on Benson, Olsen/Clark and the o-line. And I have faith in that collective group.

by tyger1147 on Aug 23, 2007 9:11 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

"might"
sure it could be better. the reason most teams don't return to the super bowl is because of injury. if everyone plays as well as last year and noone gets hurt then everything does indeed rest on the O. of course, we were giving up 100+ ruhing yards a game beofre tommie ent down, so we'll see if the D is enough against better competition than buffalo, san fran and tampa bay.

by mike b on Aug 23, 2007 11:14 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

oh no shit?
i must have missed that.

either that or i think it wil be harder to do with injuries since their competition is harder.

one of those two.

by mike b on Aug 23, 2007 4:52 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Their competition isn't that much harder.
You should really start researching more.

And you must have missed the injury part, because the implication of your thread is that the D "might not" be better because their might be injuries like "most Super Bowl" teams.

Unless you were just talking out of your ass and not making any points. Which is a complete possibility. In fact, a likelihood.

by tyger1147 on Aug 24, 2007 8:38 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

9 games better
In the opponent W-L column this year than last year using 06 numbers.

Spliting that up a bit, our 2006 home opponents were 33-47, while our 2007 home opponents were 45-35. away is the same way we played sub .500 teams on the road last year, 0ur 2007 away opponents were .500 teams last year.

as far as "1 game within .500 teams"  buffalo(7-9), st. louis (8-8), and san fran (7-9) were replaced with dallas (9-7), denver (9-7), and KC (9-7).

enough for me think that the same caliber of injuries sustained as last year would make it harder to achieve a similiar record.

if you were half as smart/witty as you think you are, you would be quite a contributor.

by mike b on Aug 24, 2007 9:28 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

edit
"away is NOT the same way we played ABOVE .500 teams on the road last year, 0ur 2007 away opponents were .500 teams last year"

by mike b on Aug 24, 2007 9:37 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

9 games better...
out of a collective 256 games played.  That's not THAT much harder.  We have the second easiest strength of schedule in the league based on last year's schedule.  

http://www.marasoft.com/nfl-strength-schedule.html

Of course, basing it on last year's schedule is kind of pointless if you ask me, but whatever.  The difference between the easiest and hardest is 8% (0.539 - 0.461).  Is there really THAT much difference at all?  Maybe enough to blame one or two losses on, but certainly not the fate of the season.  

If you are in a weak division, your strength of schedule suffers since you play your opponents twice each.  The fact that the Lions and Vikings are in our division hurts our strength of schedule.  Plus, the division leaders are all on our schedule and their records were terrible, for division winners.

This also explains why Oakland has a high strength of schedule since the other teams in their division went 32-16.  Likewise with the Bills/Dolphins/Jets/Patriots.  That division as a whole went 35-29.  The division leaders from the AFC all play each other so their schedules look tough as well.  It's also why Carolina/N.O./Tampa/Atlanta are all sub 0.500.  

In sum, mike b, I think if we had both Tommie and Brown went down again, or any two big studs, we would totally have a shot to go 11-5 or 12-4 at least.  We might not do it because the ball wouldn't bounce our way, but I think we would have just as much of a shot.

"World Champs" on 3. 1...2...3, "WORLD CHAMPS!"

by mikebdot on Aug 24, 2007 10:24 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

actually
and I failed to mention this, but i did not nclude NFC north opponents in those numbers for the exact reason they are so bad and skew the numbers by so much.

That is also why i didn't use online strength of schedule rankings.

I would love to use this years records but that is a bit harder.

My point at the beginning was that the same production fromt this team as last year won't be enough in my opinion. The liklihood of getting that is debatable, (I don't see us getting 6 return TD's).

Doesn't really matter that much anyway, it's all opinion until the whislte is blown.

by mike b on Aug 24, 2007 10:36 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oh.
I didn't double check your #'s.  

In any event, it doesn't matter AT ALL if we don't have two huge starters go down.  Which I will define as:

Urlacher
Harris
Brown
Berrian/Hester
Tillman/Vasher

There are probably others who are debatable.  Some might say Rex, but I really think Griese would play fairly well in that event.  

Yeah, using this year's records is hard.  I just can't seem to find them published.  Damn time travelers keeping the data to themselves!

"World Champs" on 3. 1...2...3, "WORLD CHAMPS!"

by mikebdot on Aug 24, 2007 10:48 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

yes
if the d stays healthy then you have to feel pretty good, but we still need the offense to get better, the defense didn't cost us too many regular season games anyway.

by mike b on Aug 24, 2007 11:03 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't know,
St. Louis, Tampa, Detroit, and GB weren't the greatest defensive performances.  Nor was Seattle.  Heck, the huge amount of TOs got us the victory against N.O.  And one could argue that in the SB we could have used a few more 3-5 play drives by the Colts...Harris and Brown certainly would have helped in that regard.  I would like to think that Reggie Wayne would not have been wide open with Brown back there...if Manning still throws that ball into single coverage it is either broken up, picked off, or just complete because that ball was WAY underthrown.  Manning probably doesn't throw it if he's covered though.  He might if it's Wayne against Brown...

But yes, I do agree our offense needs to turn the ball over less (obviously Grossman has the most control over that).  

"World Champs" on 3. 1...2...3, "WORLD CHAMPS!"

by mikebdot on Aug 24, 2007 11:25 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

San fran
racked up 127 yards against us last year.  That was due to a very long run near the end of the game if I recall correctly.  One 53 yard run.  And a 21 yard run as well.  Of course, we didn't have Mike Brown or AA in there at safety, who are both good run stopping safeties...I think Brown is way more important than people give him credit for, which makes his loss every year suck even worse...
"World Champs" on 3. 1...2...3, "WORLD CHAMPS!"

by mikebdot on Aug 23, 2007 3:58 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome Grabowskis, to SB Nation's blog about everything Chicago Bears.

Community Guidelines
Start posting about the Bears »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Lightbulb_small
Why The Defense Has Collapsed
Bears_small
Hang in there, Bears!

Recent FanPosts

Small
Lovie Smith iz Stoopid and Fire Him We Should
Blake_again_small
Let's Face The Facts............All Day Long.....................
610x_small
My keys to victory over Cardinals
Small
2010 O-Line Help in Draft? Unlikely
Medium_matt-forte_small
An interesting video!
Jimmcmahon_small
Olin Kreutz is one of the dirtiest players in the NFL
Andrew602_avatar_small
Ask Revenge of the Birds
Bears2_small
Key Player to keep an eye on: Dominique Rodgers-Comartie
Devin-hester_small
Photshop contest
Small
The Upcoming Schedule & DA Defense

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

Big Blue View
Chargers 21, Giants 20: Our nightmare continues
Pride Of Detroit
Lions Blow 17-0 Lead, Lose to Seahawks 32-20
Niners Nation
Titans 24 - 49ers 20: FINAL THREAD!

SPONSORS


General Manager/ Head Coach

Windycity_small Adam T

Les-miles-bears-2_small Dane Noble

Assistant Head Coach

Briggsie_small ChiFan13

Position Coaches

Evalltheway_small SackMan

Leelee_n_laylor_bff wiltfongjr