Bears Crash, Lose to Vikings 34-14
There are inconsistent teams in the league. The NY Jets going from handing Tennessee their first lose of the season to getting beat handily by Denver. The Raiders beat up Denver and then go out and get blown up by the Chiefs. For my money though the Bears are the most inconsistent team during a game. Literally from drive to drive we don't know what team we are going to get and that is on both sides of the ball.
The Bears go from 0 to great in 6.5 seconds. The problem is they also go from great to suck in 3.2. Orton goes from throwing nice touch passes all over the field to hitting Vikings receivers right in the numbers. Bears receivers go from making finger tip catches to not catching the ball when Orton all but walks it over to them. The defense looks fired up on one drive only to let Peterson carry the entire defense for 10 yards. Ron Turner has one drive that is inspiring, so he takes the rest of the night off. FOR THE LOVE OF DICK BUTKUS CAN SOMEBODY TEAR OUT THE PAGE THAT HAS MCKIE UP THE MIDDLE OUT OF HIS PLAYBOOK!!!!! (I've been corrected. It wasn't McKie, but it was the same ignorant play)
First let us get the good thing out of the way. Congrats to Matt Forte for crossing the 1000 yard mark and having possibily the only good game amongst all the Bears.
OFFENSE
Ugly or Pretty or Loopy or lucky as it may have been to get there, there was a time in this game where the Bears could have gone up on the Vikings 14-3. They were at the goal line and Turner thought going up the middle into the teeth of the Vikings on 3 plays was a good idea. Surprise, that didn't work. I'm going to take a bit of blame on this one. I foolishly thought everybody had heard this, but apparently not, so I am going to say it out loud. If the Williams' are in the lineup you run the ball anywhere but up the middle. Run it off tackle. Try to break it outside, just don't put your head down and go at them.
As mentioned despite the Vikings having a great run defense Forte had a very good game. He ended with 96 yards and a 4.4 average. He also had a receiving TD.
After him it is all down hill. Kyle Orton did have 153 yards and 2 TDs, but he sprinkled in 3 INTs at the end.
Hester had 67 yards receiving on 3 receptions. Problem is 65 of them came on 1 catch.
Jared Allen ran over John St. Clair all night long.
The really, really, really great thing about this is that we went from thinking we have our franchise QB, back to not having any clue what we have.
DEFENSE
I'll give these guys some credit. They did play hard. They were put into some really bad spots, but the offense. They were moving around, making some plays and generally hustling out there. Tillman had a bad night. He screwed the pooch on the play to Berrian for a 99 yd TD and then followed that up with a horse collar tackle to extend a Vikings play.
The Bears looked good early and were getting good pressure on Ferrotte, but that lasted about 8 minutes and they went back to the same old overpaid and non-producing defensive front we have come to know.
OVERALL
Right about now I am going to stop and open it up to you. I am at a loss to figure out where we are. We still can make the playoffs. We have a lead on the Packers and the Vikings have a much harder schedule and I am also not endorsing the lose for a better draft pick theory, but really what is this team and what can they do in the playoffs when they can't even get out of their own way?
172 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
by the way
there was no mckie up the middle tonight as he was inactive, instead it was J Davis who i’m inclined to think is Jason Davis who played fullback for u of i a year or two ago.
that must be a joke
the play doesn’t work with the starter, so they run it with his backup?
Being Who You Thought We Were Since 2005!
Why does Turner and this play.......
…..remind me of that golfer in the movie Tin Cup who keeps trying to make a shot at the expense of winning the tournament.
The opponents know the play is coming, Turner isn’t fooling anyone with it but yet he keeps running the stupid thing anyways. I swear every time the Bear’s run that fullback dive at the goal line it goes over like a fart in church!
hopefully
the start running fake fullback dives since everyone knows they run it so much
orton...
So… do people still want to give Orton a big contract extension?
Bringing moderation to a place I don't moderate.
visit the mindful mission
you give him an extension
to reward a body of work…. there is no body, just losses.
he has still not proven that he can put a complete game together against a top tier defense.
i dont trust this team anymore, including orton.
by rahulsriram on Nov 30, 2008 11:40 PM CST up reply actions
interesting...
So you would rather lock in mediocrity (at best), then find a good quarterback?
Bringing moderation to a place I don't moderate.
visit the mindful mission
by big_lowitzki on Nov 30, 2008 11:43 PM CST up reply actions
Who would you like to see otherwise?
McNabb?
I"m not giving Orton my vote of confidence, but I am curious who we can get that will be better for next year.
Being Who You Thought We Were Since 2005!
i would...
…. rather see this team rebuild with a (potentially) good quarterback than reward a mediocre QB with a big contract.
Orton has not shown an ability against good defenses that would warrant a contract extension.
Bringing moderation to a place I don't moderate.
visit the mindful mission
by big_lowitzki on Nov 30, 2008 11:51 PM CST up reply actions
I don't know...
I am not sure which QB the Bears should go after, but I have no idea how you believe that Kyle Orton deserves a contract extension at this point.
He had a couple of good games, against pretty bad teams. And you want to reward him for that?
Bringing moderation to a place I don't moderate.
visit the mindful mission
by big_lowitzki on Nov 30, 2008 11:55 PM CST up reply actions
I'm not advocating a huge dollar amount with a 10-year contract
But sign him to a 2-3 year deal. Draft a QB, then pull a Packers. Sit him, let him understand the system, then when Orton goes away, the backup is set to go.
I know Orton made bad decisions tonight, but how many dropped passes did we have tonight?
I'M A MAN! I'M 22!
dropped passes
only count for grossman. just like how tipped pass interceptions aren’t grossman’s fault. keep up.
Oh, that's right
I should’ve known better. Grossman gets his own circumstances, but Orton doesn’t.
I'M A MAN! I'M 22!
umm...
Orton playing badly (and he DID play badly), has nothing to do with Rex Grossman.
Good try though.
Bringing moderation to a place I don't moderate.
visit the mindful mission
try for what?
to say people only look at certain things for certain players?
Look, I'm an Orton defender. I know that
but when you have zero recievers who can get open against good defenses, your QB is going to have problems looking good against good defenses.
And who is your potentially good hypothetical qb? McNabb? I hate Donovan McNabb. Take that back, I hate watching him ever run a 2 minute drill. When the games not on the line, he’s pretty good. And why would he ever come here? Different system, similar talent? That makes zero sense to me.
Boiler up!
by halfblindcubbiegirl on Dec 1, 2008 7:34 AM CST up reply actions
I would....
… rather draft a QB and let them develop than reward Orton with a big contract.
Bringing moderation to a place I don't moderate.
visit the mindful mission
So you want to start over again?
I like the progression Orton’s shown this year and think he’s the guy.
But really. I don’t want to start over again. Unless we’re going for a gutting of the coaching staff (which I don’t see reasonably happening. as much as we’d all like to see SOMEONE get canned).
Boiler up!
by halfblindcubbiegirl on Dec 1, 2008 3:01 PM CST up reply actions
Yes.
Yes, I want to start over.
I do not want to settle for mediocrity, and that is what we have with Kyle Orton.
Bringing moderation to a place I don't moderate.
visit the mindful mission
You do understand that this team, as built, is mediocre at best?
They have to “start over” somewhere? O-line? WR’s? DE’s? LB’s?
They can do more than one at once…
Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!
Something about Mark Sanchez
Makes me water at the mouth (no homo).
Very athletic guy, good arm, he’s got all the physical attributes. Either he’ll be a huge success in the NFL or be a disappointing bust.
I am like your Dan Aykroyd and biglow would be Jane, the ignorant slut. -Chad
Your not serious are you?
Thank you,
these bumblefucks think the Sox are going to trade Dye. I said I would cancel my membership on here in martyrdom of Dye being traded.
Yeah, I am.
Rex isn’t the answer, but Orton is more of the answer than Rex is. Again, who else would you get? Rebuild yet again? We’d get to the Super Bowl in 10 years again….woohoo!
I'M A MAN! I'M 22!
We...
… don’t want “more of the answer.” You are settling for mediocrity, at best.
And yea… rebuild again. This team needs to rebuild anyway. They have an old offensive line. They have a bad defense. They don’t have any wide receivers. But yea… lets reward a mediocre QB because we don’t want to rebuild again.
Bringing moderation to a place I don't moderate.
visit the mindful mission
by big_lowitzki on Nov 30, 2008 11:56 PM CST up reply actions
See, we disagree
I think we have the talent on defense. We just don’t have the coaching in place to put them in a position to win.
I'M A MAN! I'M 22!
You start rebuilding by HAVING a quarterback
I think KO could be the qb for the future. Give him a deal and then build around him and Forte. Fill in talent AROUND their strengths.
Boiler up!
by halfblindcubbiegirl on Dec 1, 2008 7:35 AM CST up reply actions
I agree...
… with this:
You start rebuilding by HAVING a quarterback
But Kyle Orton is not that quarterback.
Bringing moderation to a place I don't moderate.
visit the mindful mission
why is resigning him now an option in the first place?
technically, he’s under contract for another season. truthfully, with his injury, and his sometimes poor play (especially against good teams), and god-awful play-calling of turner, and his mediocre WRs, its hard to know what we have in orton. i say we let him go into next year (unless he plays insanely good down the stretch and leads us into the postseason) with his contract. if he does well, we extend him during the season. but in no way, shape, or form, should we extend him before next year.
by guy incognito on Dec 1, 2008 11:26 AM CST up reply actions
no we should go get matt cassel
he’s terrific.
I am a huge bears fan
but this team just makes me sick to watch, they have no enthisuim from lovie down they down get excited r even act like they are giving it full effort
Not to be an ass or anything
but anyone who thought Orton was going to be our franchise QB was more than a litte bit in over his or her head per se.
Thank you,
these bumblefucks think the Sox are going to trade Dye. I said I would cancel my membership on here in martyrdom of Dye being traded.
And anyone who overreacts too much
is someone you don’t want pulling the trigger.
Not to be an ass or anything, but thank Jesus, Mary, and Joseph you’re not pullin the trigger.
I'M A MAN! I'M 22!
I don't even think Grossman has thrown 3 interceptions in a 7 pass span....
Thank you,
these bumblefucks think the Sox are going to trade Dye. I said I would cancel my membership on here in martyrdom of Dye being traded.
and what am i overreacting to?
Its Week 13 already and Orton has had maybe 2-3 good games from finish to start.
Thank you,
these bumblefucks think the Sox are going to trade Dye. I said I would cancel my membership on here in martyrdom of Dye being traded.
Uh huh
and name me a young quarterback who HASN’T had issues, other than Matt Ryan who has a killer running game to rely on and a good coach staff to back him up and a stud wr in roddy white? Hm?
Boiler up!
by halfblindcubbiegirl on Dec 1, 2008 7:38 AM CST up reply actions
Is...
… Kyle Orton young?
Bringing moderation to a place I don't moderate.
visit the mindful mission
Since 2005.
That’s, what, one year longer than Brady Quinn? It’s hilarious that you think one bad game is a reason to dump a quarterback who’d been playing well until an injury, but you’re convinced that the next one is going to be the man of your dreams. If he blows it again next week, you may have a point- right now, though, you’re doing that QB-eating thing again us Bears’ fans are known for.
—d
Who said it was one bad game?
He’s in his fourth season? Started all of 2005.
He’s gotten a lot of playtime by now. He’s got experience. He should be making better decisions than he did last night. That’s exactly why Rex was benched.
However, right now he’s looking bad. If you read some of my other comments I don’t think he’s a great QB but he’s alright but right now he’s still too injured. He shouldn’t be in because the bears have somebody better but because if they want to keep him around, he’s going to get more hurt.
And nobody said the “next one is the going to be the man of your dreams.”
one bad game?
really?
Bringing moderation to a place I don't moderate.
visit the mindful mission
by big_lowitzki on Dec 1, 2008 12:36 PM CST up reply actions
too bad the bears have 5 dollar receivers
if not, maybe then some catches would be made
Did anyone watch the same game as me?
I don’t know why you are all freaking about orton… He looked off sharper and tried to hit llyod in stride but sharper didnt bite like most safeties would have… A great play on his part. Hester hitched in the wrong direction and the ball was out of his hand after it was too late. And Rashied Davis can’t catch for his life he dropped what 4 balls tonight… But then again so did everyone but forte. IMO it was a poorly called game on turners part in the red zone and the recievers didnt execute at all. I think that our AP should play fullback at this point rather than so random guy the spent part of the year on the raiders. We have to win three of the last games and the packers is a must win!
AP
Is he big enough to play fullback? I know he’s a physical player, but he still looks like a little dude.
If we were really going to do a fullback dive on the goal line stand in the second quarter, we should have just said fuck it and put Tommie Harris in.
—d
A WR is what we need
Orton doesn’t appear to be anything more than a mediocre QB. But what would really help a Mediocre QB, is a good WR, which we don’t have. The dropped passes were killing Kyle last night. Yeah, he threw some terrible ones, but he also threw some good ones that would have extended some drives had the WRs caught them. At best Hester is a #2 WRs. On one of the plays he ran an in, and Orton threw it to him on the outside. I’m more willing to believe that Hester ran the wrong route than the QB not knowing where it was going.
I want Greg Olsen to be an elite receiving TE, but he’s not. He’s a non factor. It’s pretty bad when teams can shut him down by playing nickel and putting a corner on him. The only thing he’s really done is catch fade routes in the endzone. That or Ron Turner doesn’t know how to use him. I mean c’mon old-ass Tony Gonzales crushes teams still, and with Nobody Thigpen throwing him the ball, and with the Defense knowing he’s their #1 threat.
sigh……
Nobody Thigpen
has actually looked pretty good, hell he has probably had as many good games as kyle orton at this point and orton has way more experience.
Briggs
On the vikings two late TD drives, I saw Briggs wiff on 3 times trying to tackle Adrian Peterson.
Briggs was hurt late
He kicked his leg out on a play to try to stop AP and I think he got hurt on that play. From that point on during timeouts and the such, he was slow movingand often favoring that leg.
Orton - these are the same stats who should have had last week
Last week he got lucky that Rams defenders couldn’t hand on to balls that hit them in the hands. The vikings have better hands than that.
I’m not going to argue Orton is or isn’t a mediocre QB or better/worse than Rex. But he shouldn’t be in the games yet. He’s clearly not healthy enough. He still can’t plant and throw. He’s got to rely too much on arm strength rather than getting his body into it. He doesn’t have any mobility or ability to avoid sacks. If they want to keep Orton long term, they need to give him time to heal. One of these games he’s going to pop that ankle even worse than it is now.
he actually was mobile in this game though...
the problem was he had 0.5 seconds to throw before the entire d-line was crushing him.
Orton's real problem
was that the WRs and St. Clair had a bad game. Would Rex have stepped up in the pocket as it was collapsing? No, because Rex would have ran straight backwards like he STILL does and probably gotten stripped. Instead Orton stepped up in the pocket, moved around, and threw INTs instead. It was pretty obvious that Orton lost confidence in the WRs and started gambling in the 2nd half. I couldn’t believe the pass that actually hit Hester in the arm, or all the passes that hit Davis in the hands. How horrible was it to watch Jared Allen straight play games with St. Clair in slow motion, with Madden diagramming it? It reminded me of when he would do that with Favre on the Packers after Favre had p’owned us…it made me throw up in my mouth a bit.
no
Orton’s real problem was that the WRs and St. Clair had a bad game.
This is simply not true.
Don’t get me wrong – the WR’s didn’t help, but I am not that worried about dropped passes or incompletions in looking at Orton’s play. It is an issue, but it isn’t why I am frustrated with him.
He made several really bad reads, and several bad throws. Interesting that no one is talking about the first down play on the goal line stand – Olsen was open in the end zone, and Orton decided to throw it into the stands, well over Olsen’s head.
Bringing moderation to a place I don't moderate.
visit the mindful mission
WOW
Remember that conversation we had about stats and perceptions? You said that perceptions are usually skewered. Greg Olsen was not open in the end zone. Don’t quote me, but I’m also fairly positive that he was double covered.
Next time Orton doesn’t have a read, I’ll tell him to just force it in there. What’s the worst that could happen?
Answer: He’d look like Rex.
I'M A MAN! I'M 22!
I have watched...
… the replay a couple of times this morning. He was open, and a good throw would have been a touchdown.
Bringing moderation to a place I don't moderate.
visit the mindful mission
A good throw would have had it
but it would have to have been perfect. He was doubled covered but an over the shoulder throw would have gotten it. Unfortunately that (touch)is not KO’s strength.
How about focusing on Forte...
our ONLY bright spot. How awesome is the guy? He basically is a more subtle, less flashy, more durable Adrian Peterson, except he fumbles less and can be a factor in the pass game. Do we sign him to a long extension now, because he is only going to get better. I’d rather have him than AP any day of the week. There is no more complete back in the NFL right now…if so name one. I love that Forte picks his spots to dole out punishment as well as take it; his running style is the opposite of AP’s in the good way, in way that will allow for him to have a longer career. I LOVE MATT FORTE!!!
I love me some Matt Forte
But I’m not sure I’d take him over AP. Matt Forte may be the most complete running back in the NFL right now. But for me I like AP’s running style a lot. I like a RB that wants to punish defenders. It’s awesome. It’s not conducive to a long career, but it’s great while it lasts. Comparing Forte and Peterson is like comparing Apple’s and Oranges. They’re both great, and bring different things to the table.
I I think Forte should go to the Pro Bowl this year. Him, AP and Portis should go for the NFC. But Matt won’t make it. Barber will get it ahead of him.
You mean like
pushing a pile of bears 10 yards? Or the way he bounces off defenders? Peterson is a great back.
I love Forte...
But it’s pretty hard to argue with Peterson/Portis/Turner. If we were in the AFC, Forte’d be going.
—d
Who Cares?
Even if we get in to the playoffs, we wouldn’t deserve it with so many better teams in the East and South. And, we’d flame out in the first round anyways. I wouldn’t be overly disappointed with a better draft position.
I like Orton. But, he’s no where close to having “franchise QB” locked up. If a quality QB were available to us in the off-season, we sure as hell better not pass him up because of what we MIGHT have in Orton.
If we get to the playoffs, it's more football to watch!
I get to see so few games, the more on national tv, the better.
There will be options
I’m not talking about Pro-Bowl caliber players.
I’m talking about the Matt Cassel’s, Charlie Batch’s, David Garrard’s, Kurt Warner’s, and McNabb’s of the league. I don’t care to get into a discussion about why all of these guys suck or will be signed prior to FA (Warner). Just saying, there will likely be options.
Fair enough.
I very much suspect that every one of those guys would struggle similarly to Orton if they were inserted into our offense. None of them suck, but neither can they strap a whole team on their back and win through force of will. I don’t think any of those guys would present an upgrade from Orton.
—d
Face It - "The Bears Stink!"
Fire everyone!
Mr. Orton when the guy in the white jersey is surrounded by guys in purple jerseys don’t throw the ball to them.
Mr. Turner three time right up the middle when the defense has the biggest MoF*&^ers in the whole league line up against you – Sheeesh!
"The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the intelligent are full of doubt." - Bertrand Russell
Decent Next Year
I think we’ll be a lot better on offense next year. Chris Williams will be ready to take over for St. Clair, who’s been ok, but can’t handle the elite guys. Maybe Williams will be as good as advertised.
Hopefully we’ll be smart and pick up a #1 WR in free agency if there is one. Can you image the damage the offense would be able to do if we had say…Boldin at WR? even with Orton, we’d be dangerous.
painful
hester gives us a 7 point lead to start with and we mess it up, reminds me of the super bowl all over again.
The give to the fullback wasnt actually that bad a call.
1st down: bad play to olsen,
2nd: run to the outside with forte (dont like it, more lateral running than vertical)
3rd: fb
4th: forte (did he get the ball across the plane btw?)
4th down play shoulda been called on the 1st 2 downs. williams wall or not forte can get a yard up the middle on 4 downs if thats what it is gonna take (which is obviously the case)
The O/Turner needed to call more short passes to forte. and what happened to Hester lets see more of the canes formation or reverses or screen (has anybody suggested that b4?)
What to do with Orton? he is the captain and the team is behind him. best qb ive seen 4 the bears in awhile. definitely resign him…. However I think the Bears should keep their eyes on a qb in what i think will be a qb rich draft (past tell me the odds not good tho) Is detroit making sure they get tebow?
Forte wasn't even close to crossing
That was the endzone where I was sitting. They weren’t even close on any of those plays.
so
when you draft this qb of the future, and he’s not lighting it up by his second full year are you going to be suprised?
orton has showed improvement from year 1 to year 2. I’m not sure what else people expect.
if you’re worried about him getiting a big deal, well he’s playing his way out of that.
also
you need to draft a qb this year anyway, grossman will gone and hanie is only an option to people who think every late pick is a brady or romo waiting to happen.
Inconsistent = not that good
More consistently good = a good player/team
Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!
Anyone who thought Orton was a franchise QB is an idiot.
The guy is a classic placeholder. For the most part, he won’t kill ya. Had they drafted a QB this year or last, he’d have a year or two on the sidelines while Orton provided adequate production for a rebuilding team.
instead, the Bears needed to draft: Michael Okwo, Garrett Wolfe, Chris Williams, Matt Forte, Earl Bennett and marcus Harrison.
Okay, okay. One of those was a great pick, one was a good pick and is still in question. The others were horrible.
Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!
Which one?
Forte’s the great pick, obviously, but Harrison’s been delivering solidly every time he’s been on the field. Williams hasn’t seen enough action to be “horrible”, and Wolfe is one of the true bright spots on the team. Okwo was a bust, obviously, and Bennett seems to be crappy in practice, but I think you’re overreacting a tad.
—d
Thank you
I appreciate all of mighty mites efforts but the guy is useless. Can’t block, can’t run unless no one around him and even on special teams he can’t block anyone or beat a block. What a waste of a third round pick. Nice guy but try selling real estate instead..
I'm not Wolfe advocate
but it seems like he’s been in on every special teams tackle the past few weeks…
--Torch
He does have 15, which is quite a bit for a special teamer.
But for a third-round pick? It’s busty.
Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!
Are you watching the same games I am?
He’s usually the first guy to the ball on every special teams play and the last guy to give chase and save the touchdown if someone breaks away. He’s been nothing as a running back for us, sure, but there’s no way “can’t block anyone or beat a block” applies. He’s been a major factor this year.
—d
Focus on the Coaching
Once again, horrible coaching, non adjustments, and just flat out bad coaching:
1. On the goal line.. first, obviously bad play calling then on 4th and goal, when your line has not moved any viking off the line of scrimmage, you run it into the pile again? Take the three! I know this is an easy second guess, but trust me, I was screaming at the TV for Lovie to take the three in that situation. Coaching.
2. Team tackling – horrible!!! – that is coaching. I know AP is an incredible back. Probably best pure RB in the NFL but only reason why he broke that run for 59yards was poor technique. I was reminded of how the Bears used to tackle Barry Sanders on that play. Coaching.
3. Route running. I am certain that at least one of the interceptions thrown by Orton was due to an incorrectly run route. I cannot recall a group of receivers that go into their cut then start to shuffle sideways instead of continuing the crossing pattern (or out) as much as the Bears do. On simple hook patterns, they don’t come back to the ball, they hook and wait. Coaching.
4. Unless your name says “Forte” on the back of the uniform, you can’t catch a cold. Rashied Davis needs to be cut today. Routine passes right through the hands. Additionally, over the course of the year I have seen Bears receivers and DB’s allow the ball to get into their bodies for the catch instead of catching with the hands leading to frequent drops on both sides of the ball. RECEIVER AND DB 101 – YOU CATCH THE BALL WITH THE HANDS AND AT ITS HIGHEST POINT!!! It is seldom that ours do this. Coaching.
5. Vikings on the 1 yard line. Our defensive “scheme” has us leave a 1.5-2 yard gap over the Vikings left side “A” gap (gap between the center and left guard). Absolute no brainer QB sneak for an easy Frerotte score. The Vikings saw that on film guaranteed. That was just too freakin easy. Horrible design. Horrible coaching.
6. Is it me or does every time the camera focuses on Lovie, he appears to spending his time watching the replay on the big screen instead of… coaching… If he wants to watch the game, get your ass on the couch.
7. It was obvious very early that Jared Allen was going to eat St. Clairs lunch all day long. Yet Turner never seemed to help him out with a chip or setting up Clark or Olsen at the wing just to slow him down. If he did, he didn’t do it nearly enough. He was just left out there to blow by St Clair all day. And trust me, Allen knows that. His adrenaline kept creeping higher and higher as no one adjusted to his rush. Coaching.
8. Horse collar tackles – they all know its against the rules, yet Tillman went straight for that part of his uniform. Either he is just too stupid for words OR his coaches haven’t stressed it enough. I prefer the latter – Coaching.
9. Brad Maynard – I will give the coaches a break on this one. Time for a new punter.
10. Devin Hester – This point has been beaten to death on this blog. Devin was successful when he took the ball up the field and not sideways. I am hopeful someone on the staff has pointed this out to him right? Sadly, I just don’t know.
I have more, but I’m tired, frustrated, irritated and don’t want to think about it anymore. Players certainly have responsibility in this debacle (I’m looking at you Tillman, St Clair, Davis, Hester, Orton, D-Line) but it is the coaching staff and the lack of basic fundamentals that stem from a solid coaching staff that has this team so inconsistent. To me, the incosistent teams are the ones most poorly coached.
I’m done.
by Cards67 on Dec 1, 2008 9:28 AM CST reply actions 1 recs
Point 7 may have cost us the game...
Jared Allen owned St. Clair, and we NEVER had a TE line-up on on Allen to help out St. Clair.
Points 3 and 4...
add this to points 3 and 4: the word is out on our undersized WRs that if you jam them or play them close they can’t get any separation, and they are intimidated and drop easy catches.
In terms of receivers...and to your point...
I think it is time to give Earl Bennett some reps. He certainly could not be any worse that the motley crew we run out there every Sunday. Earl has more size that Davis and Lloyd… and is a Vanderbilt grad, hopefully making him smart and run his routes correctly… ahhhh who am I kidding… Worth a shot anyway.
Tillman's horse collar...
…probably saved a touchdown there. It looked to me like he just didn’t want to get burned by Berrian again.
—d
I thought of that but
I watched the replay and there were at least two Bears, over the top that could have made the tackle shortly behind the horse collar. Another couple yards, at the most, was all Berrian was going to get. Of course, Tillman doesn’t know this at the time but still, grab a shirt tail, an arm, an ankle, or better yet, DONT LET BERRIAN FREE IN SPACE… (Is it just me or does it seem that our receivers are the only ones in the NFL that cannot get free from coverage on a consistent basis?)
I am absolutely in awe
I’ve noticed a trend around here after games this year. There are two obvious sides, Orton supporters and previous/current Rex supporters.
Whenever Orton has a good game, Orton supporters tell it how it is. Previous/current Rex supporters usually point to one bad decision, a mediocre stat line, or the opposing team’s defense to show how Orton “didn’t have THAT good of a game.” Whenever Orton makes bad plays/decisions, or is bad over any length of time, previous/current Rex supporters cry wolf and declare that Orton isn’t the guy.
I agree that we need to draft another QB because Rex will be gone after this year. I’m sorry, but Matt Cassel, Tom Brady, Peyton Manning, Henry Burris, Caleb Hanie, Kordell Stewart, or Drew Brees would all end up the same as Orton. WE HAVE NO OFFENSIVE PLAYMAKERS BESIDES FORTE! We have a bad OL crew and a worse receiving corps. Until we fix those, no QB will do anything of note in Chicago.
In summation: Stop whining and be realistic.
I'M A MAN! I'M 22!
Isn't that the same for every argument?
The supporters blow everything positive out of proportion and the detractors blow everything negative out of proportion?
There is no “telling it how it is.” It’s all arguing about the stats and trying to make the team better because clearly they’re not that good.
In sum: stop whining and be realistic.
You would make a good point
except I also have one that no one has quite responded to yet:
No offensive playmakers minus Forte. Bad OL. Worse WR’s.
Your witness.
I'M A MAN! I'M 22!
You're correct
Only Forte looked good last night.
But the OL wasn’t bad (wasn’t good either). Orton had some time most of the night. There was pressure but he didn’t spend all night on his back like Mn did to Rodgers.
Dropped balls hurt. Those did like bad.
HOWEVER, bad decisions and also throwing directly to defenders hurts worse. The receiver doesn’t get a chance to drop it in those cases. As I’ve said several times, Orton is playing hurt and it’s hurting his play.
.
I wouldn't say our OLine
was bad last night. Forte nearly had a hundo on them last night. I have to blame Turner because there is a way to slow down a pass rush and we didn’t do it. 3 step drops, dump offs to the te, rbs. We only attempted one screen pass last night?? You have to slow that down. I can’t blame St Clair, the guy was blocking maybe the best DE in the league and we gave him no help. The Offensive game plan stunk last night because Turner designed it like we were playing the rams again.
wait...
… so you mean that there are differing opinions around here?
shocking.
once again… as the ortion supporters don’t seem to get it. this is not about rex grossman. this is about kyle orton. stop justifying orton’s mediocre/bad play by pointing to grossman.
as i said in the previous thread, i wanted grossman over orton. and i think that i was wrong in that. but that doesn’t mean that orton is a good option moving forward.
Bringing moderation to a place I don't moderate.
visit the mindful mission
by big_lowitzki on Dec 1, 2008 12:39 PM CST up reply actions
lol
Oh big…
There is no good in your world, is it?
Once again, please name your “option” then. Sorry, I don’t want to go through 4 years of being horrible just so we can have a “good option.”
I'M A MAN! I'M 22!
i would rather...
… go through a couple of “horrible” years in order to be good rather than go through a bunch of mediocre years.
Bringing moderation to a place I don't moderate.
visit the mindful mission
lol
Again, assuming that we pick a good QB. What if we don’t? Then we’re set back more than a couple years.
I'M A MAN! I'M 22!
sure...
But that is a risk that NEEDS to be taken.
Mediocrity will never win anything.
Bringing moderation to a place I don't moderate.
visit the mindful mission
What about going out and getting a good WR?
Why can’t we do that and at least trying to see if it’ll work instead of starting over?
I'M A MAN! I'M 22!
please tell me...
… how Orton’s bad reads, that have become somewhat of a pattern, are the fault of his receivers.
Bringing moderation to a place I don't moderate.
visit the mindful mission
have you read...
… what I have written?
I have already said, very clearly, that I am not nearly as concerned with dropped passes/incompletions than bad decisions.
QBss throw incompletions, WRs drop passes. Unfortunately the Bears’ WRs drop more than their share.
But that doesn’t justify the bad decisions. At all.
Bringing moderation to a place I don't moderate.
visit the mindful mission
still waiting...
… for an answer on this one.
Bringing moderation to a place I don't moderate.
visit the mindful mission
you...
… never said what? that bad reads were the receivers fault?
No… you never said that, but you DO continue to blame all of Orton’s struggles on the lack of tools around him.
And where did I say that you said Orton was a worldbeater. Huh?
Bringing moderation to a place I don't moderate.
visit the mindful mission
Why, because I never brought it up?
Oh. My fault. Here’s my official statement:
Kyle Orton is responsible for his bad reads, but his receivers are responsible for their dropped passes.
I'M A MAN! I'M 22!
neither did anyone else
Visit The Cub Reporter (thecubreporter.com)
by thecubreporter on Dec 1, 2008 3:45 PM CST up reply actions
and...
There is no good in your world, is it?
If we are talking about Grossman or Orton, then no, there really isn’t much good in that.
Further… I would argue that if the Bears drafted a QB in the top 15-20 picks, there would be a very decent chance that the QB would at least be as good as Kyle Orton sooner than later.
Bringing moderation to a place I don't moderate.
visit the mindful mission
I have already answered...
… more than once.
Bringing moderation to a place I don't moderate.
visit the mindful mission
Not sure...
… why you are so stuck on my naming a name.
Orton is a mediocre quarterback, at best. That is simply not a player you want to build around.
I would rather take a risk with a rookie QB with higher potential.
Bringing moderation to a place I don't moderate.
visit the mindful mission
Ravens did
Visit The Cub Reporter (thecubreporter.com)
by thecubreporter on Dec 1, 2008 2:49 PM CST up reply actions
you mean...
… picks like Brady Quinn? Or Joe Flacco?
Of course, Orton was taken in the 4th round, but somehow you don’t think that the Bears can find a better QB before that?
And this draft could be pretty deep with QB’s…
Bringing moderation to a place I don't moderate.
visit the mindful mission
I have already...
… responded to this silly argument.
Question for you: Should the Bears never draft a QB high again, because Rex Grossman didn’t mean up to expectations.
And, since you continue to want to bring Rex Grossman up as if it is relevant, lets do that:
Rex, career QB rating: 70.2
Orton, career QB rating: 71.1
Rex, career %: 54.2
Orton, career %: 54.8
Rex, career yds/att: 6.41
Orton, career yds/att: 5.86
I know… you don’t like stats. They are too objective for you. But if you really want to continue to bring up Rex, maybe you will begin to realize that they are both equally mediocre.
Bringing moderation to a place I don't moderate.
visit the mindful mission
lol
You are truly a piece of work, big. I’ve never met someone so hardheaded as you. Ever. But, that’s ok, because in your little world, you’re always right.
Keep on keepin on.
I'M A MAN! I'M 22!
piece of work?
Nice… it is funny how often you resort to personal attacks when you argue.
It is funny, because you seem pretty convinced that you are right also. Is that somehow different?
Bringing moderation to a place I don't moderate.
visit the mindful mission
I'm sorry, did you seriously take offense at me calling you a "piece of work?"
In that case, I’m sorry.
I’ve admitted mistakes before on here. If someone proves that I’m wrong, I admit I screwed up. Today was the first time I’ve seen you do that. I believe there is a difference there.
I'M A MAN! I'M 22!
offense?
I didn’t take offense. I just think that it is funny that instead of actually dealing with the discussion, you resort to personal attacks.
And I am more than willing to admit when I am wrong.
But disagreeing with you doesn’t mean that I am wrong.
Bringing moderation to a place I don't moderate.
visit the mindful mission
Easy on the bully pulpit, Mother Teresa
Remember when we had that run-in with PopeFlick? You didn’t exactly avoid personal attacks either.
I'M A MAN! I'M 22!
Mother Teresa?
There are worse people to be compared to.
And what personal attacks did I make about PopeFlick?
Bringing moderation to a place I don't moderate.
visit the mindful mission
Grossman shouldn't have been picked.
I looked at his college stats recently, and he had all the warning signs of his sophomore year being a fluke.
I agree that the Bears can’t draft a good QB to save their lives. But as the drafting of Mark Bradley, Earl Bennett and letting Bernard Berrian go (along w/ Muhammed, bringing back Booker, paying Hester like a Top-tier No. 2 WR, etc.) they aren’t any better at evaluating WR talent.
Since the QB position, I guess I’d rather they take a chance on that.
Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!
Well yeah....
I mean, we need to draft one. I’m not advocating that we not…..if we lived in a much better world, Jerry would hire someone to pick the next Bears QB for him.
I'M A MAN! I'M 22!
I can't be the only one who noticed this
In summation: Stop whining and be realistic.
which followed…
I’m sorry, but Matt Cassel, Tom Brady, Peyton Manning, Henry Burris, Caleb Hanie, Kordell Stewart, or Drew Brees would all end up the same as Orton
yeah, that’s being realistic that Orton is in the same class as Brady, Manning and Brees if he just had better talent around him.
QB’s make the talent around them better. Brady went to 3 super bowl’s before last year with Givens and Branch. Pats still don’t have a decent RB. Brees and the Saints have shuttled through about 10 receivers this year. Put the Colts players on other teams and they’re not as good (Stokley and James for example)….McNabb made 3 conference championships and a Super Bowl w/o a decent receiver. Packs shuttled through shit receivers for years with Favre.
Orton isn’t good, he’s barely mediocre and if we did have great receivers and a great O-line and a great defense, he would be passable. It seems easier to try and find one QB then 10 other guys to make the other parts of the game great.
Visit The Cub Reporter (thecubreporter.com)
by thecubreporter on Dec 1, 2008 12:53 PM CST up reply actions
TO
didn’t play in the playoffs that year until the Super Bowl
Visit The Cub Reporter (thecubreporter.com)
by thecubreporter on Dec 1, 2008 1:31 PM CST up reply actions
Umm...
Great points if we lived in Wonderland.
1) Patriots have the majority of their SB team back. No wonder Cassel has been so good.
2) The Saints? Yeah, they’ve shuffled through 10 receivers, and three of their names are Moore, Colston, and Shockey. Just a ship-shop corps.
3) Put the Colts players on other teams and they’re not as good…..please prove it. You can’t.
4) Packers shuffled through shit receivers….yeah, they were just terrible. You’re right.
So, you make a bunch of points that are false and irrelevant.
I'M A MAN! I'M 22!
oh dear lord...
So, you make a bunch of points that are false and irrelevant.
yes, compared to you’re fantastic points that ignore what I wrote.
1) Pats went to 3 Super Bowl’s before last year, when Brady got real talent he had possibly the greatest QB season ever. Tell me what any Pats receiver or RB from those first 3 teams did since leaving NE?
2) Moore’s been healthy, but Colston and Shockey have missed time. Saints offense hasn’t missed a beat because Brees is a good QB in a good system.
3) Stokley and James…I can’t think of anyone else, but Harrison and Wayne are where they’re at because of Manning, not the other way around.
4) They’re nothing special, never have been…Favre made them all better. I can’t think of one WR from Green Bay that ever did anything after leaving GB.
Good QB’s make everyone better, they make marginal WR’s into All-Pro’s and help open up the running game. Yes you need a good O-line and doesn’t mean you can throw complete shit out there (like the Bears), but Orton is not the answer to any type of sustained success.
That being said, he’s signed for cheap next year, I doubt the Bears will do anything there next year.
Visit The Cub Reporter (thecubreporter.com)
by thecubreporter on Dec 1, 2008 1:47 PM CST up reply actions
Ooook...
What about Kurt Warner? You think he’s a world beater? Or is it the fact that he has Anquan Boldin and Fitzgerald?
Mediocre QB’s can look great when they have an outstanding support staff.
I'M A MAN! I'M 22!
except that
Kurt Warner has never had a season where he threw for less than a 60% completion percentage.
He’s old, but not mediocre. He will get killed with a bad O-line though because he’s has no mobility, hence the Giant years.
but Warner is a lot better than Kyle Orton….
Visit The Cub Reporter (thecubreporter.com)
by thecubreporter on Dec 1, 2008 1:59 PM CST up reply actions
not sure...
… that i would call Warner a “world beater,” but I would say that he is definitely better than Orton.
Bringing moderation to a place I don't moderate.
visit the mindful mission
Regarding Point 3
Harrison looked pretty good in the two years he was catching passes from Jim Harbaugh(!), too. He may not have been HOF material, but he was young- he certainly benefited from having a QB like Manning, but Manning also was able to develop the way that he did because he had steadiness at the position.
—d
I have a new
name for the Williams Wall. Try this out:
The “took a diaretic substance that nobody told them they couldn’t, even though the substance has been known about for 3 years, and the only reason we are taking it is to cover up our steroid use, but if we get suspended will just appeal so we can play the Bears eventhough we are cheaters and we have good lawyers” wall.
If things came easy, then everybody would be great at what they did, let's face it.
Mike Ditka
Here is my issue with all of these arguements
Offer me a solution. If I talk about our WRs, somebody will bring up Boldin or TJ or something. Prior to the season these threads listed 6 different olinement that we could go after.
But when we bring up QB nobody has a solution they just want something different. If you don’t like Orton that is great, but who is it you want us to go get? We aren’t going to have a top 10 draft pick, so we’d have to ransom our picks or players to get the big QBs or settle for the second half of the bunch. You don’t want McNabb, you didn’t want Anderson last year. Who exactly is the best guy for this team if not Orton?
If we decided to rebuild, fine. Which guy in the draft that we can reasonably get at or what FA is the guy to rebuild around?
We can’t sell a top FA receiver on a rookie QB. We can sell them on Orton did decent with no receivers and a crappy oline. Sign some line and go after a receiver. If we get a top flight WR that gives us our #1 receiver, a #1 back and our QB, that isn’t rebuilding anymore, that is taking a shot.
Being Who You Thought We Were Since 2005!
I don't think it matters
The Bears will never be a passing team. Everybody’s dreams of having a Manning or Brady will never happen. The Bears will be and always have been a defense and running team. They consistently hire coaches with defensive mentalities who love to run the ball.
Even when Grossman was playing MVP caliber QB in early 06, it was based off the play-action. It wasn’t like we turned into a passing offense. I think McNabb would be pretty good for the Bears. The Eagles throw the ball 50 times a game it seems. If you cut that in half and give McNabb a good run game, I think he excels in Chicago. I know the Eagles have Westbrook, but they don’t run him enough and I personally think that’s why the Eagles offense has struggled this year.
Just my 2 cents.
We did have a passing team at one point..
Didn’t Eric Kramer put up some monster numbers for one or two years? It can be done.
He had 1 very good season
but I don’t know about “Monster”. 3800 yds 29td 98 rating.
That being said, I don’t think 1 great season can classify the Bears as a passing team.
I can live with this
but if we are only asking for a decent QB, don’t we have that?
In the off season beef up the line, bring in somebody to be our #1 receiver, and then rebuild or retool our defense.
Being Who You Thought We Were Since 2005!
Depends
on your definition of decent. To me, a decent QB is someone who does what you ask them to do and not make mistakes. I’m not an expert at all but watching the Bears offense, it doesn’t look like it’s all that complicated. Orton’s good games aside, he hasn’t looked very good against good defenses. I guess you could say he’s decent but if that’s what we have to look forward to the next 5-10 years, then count me out.
I agree with your off-season plan. Priority #1 is solidfying the line. It is the single most important part of an offense. Not the QB, RB, TE, or WR. Cut ties with Vasher to clear up some space and get an upgrade to that line.
I think we should make a play for Boldin. I don’t know if he’s going to be a FA but if he isn’t see what it’ll take to get him. Maybe they’ll take Hester for him. If only it was that easy.
Keep the defense but upgrade the D coordinator. This is pratically the same defense from 06. I don’t think it’s a stretch to say it’s Babich.
Prior to his injury hadn't we
been in position to win every game? We had numerous 4th quarter leads, but our D couldn’t hold anybody. Is it realistic to ask that an offense put up 35 every game? I think it is realistic to ask the D to stop somebody every now and again. And the last time I checked prior to yesterday Orton just set a Bears record for INTs to pass attempts. I think that qualifies as no mistakes.
The only knock we ever really had on Orton (again prior to his injury) was that he can’t throw a deep ball.
Being Who You Thought We Were Since 2005!
Sure
that’s a very fair question. The Bears were definitely in the position to win a lot of those games thanks to Orton. But they were also in the position to either take the lead or make a comeback and couldn’t because the offense couldn’t pick up a first down. I guess I didn’t clarify that about the mistakes. I didn’t mean to imply that Orton made mistakes by throwing ints. Because on the contrary, he didn’t for a good string of games. But he also didn’t look good at all. Just because you don’t throw picks, doesn’t mean you are not making mistakes.
I concede that he has made mistakes
I’m just trying to be realistic. We are drafting in the second half of the draft, so the top QBs are not available to us. If nobody wants McNabb or whoever else is there, than Orton may still be our best option.
If I am not mistaken prior to his injury plagued season in college Orton was considered to be top 5 pick status. Wasn’t he the #1 ranked QB in preseason before the injury? That is a bit off the subject and I think I am merging another thread in this section, but just putting it out there.
Being Who You Thought We Were Since 2005!
FWIW...
The Bears would currently draft between 13 and 15 right now, if the season ended today.
And Orton was a leading Heiseman candidate before his injury, which, as Tim Tebow, Charlie Ward, Troy Smith, Jason White, Eric Crouch, and numerous others would tell you, means little for NFL success.
Bringing moderation to a place I don't moderate.
visit the mindful mission
When?
I remember he orchestrated a pretty stellar two-minute drill drive against the Falcons. The Bucs game was blown because Davis (again) dropped a pass, and the defense gave up a zillion points. Carolina might have been Orton’s fault, I don’t remember that one. He definitely choked last night, and we were out of the running in Green Bay for a lot of reasons. But the only real failed comeback I remember was the one against Tennessee, when Grossman blew it when we were down by seven.
I think when Orton had to come back so quickly after playing hurt that it changed things. He looked very good up until that point.
—d
'97 wasn't too bad either
3000 yards but 14/14 TD/INT
wasn’t Ron Turner the OC back then as well?
and yeah, I’d take McNabb
Visit The Cub Reporter (thecubreporter.com)
by thecubreporter on Dec 1, 2008 1:18 PM CST up reply actions
Agreed..
You take a look around the NFL, and with our rag tag O-Line (John St. Clair starting left OT really?), and marginal receiving corps, Tom Brady (or any other highly regarded, successful QB) would not be as highly regarded had he been drafted and played with this group instead of the Pats. I think that either Orton or Grossman could be quality long term QB’s for this franchise if they had a stud O-Line, one high end WR, and a couple other Brandon Stokely, Wes Welker types. I know that is a pipe dream but its the truth. I am not giving Orton a pass here as he made some bad decisions but just dumping a bunch of money on a free agent QB or draft… without fixing the root cause of a majority of your problems, is not sound management.
Generally speaking
Grossman’s issues for mental and mechanical mistakes, so it is hard to put him as successful until I see that he has gotten past those. Last night it got so bad, Madden was defending Orton. The Vikes were getting pressure so easily with jut 4 that they kept the entire rest of the D back in coverage. I dare say any Qb throws some INTs and doesn’t look that great if they have 8 guys in coverge to your 3 receivers and 2 TEs. If our line could stop anything, they would have to blitz just like everybody else and that leaves holes and good match ups.
Being Who You Thought We Were Since 2005!
Funny you'd mention that the Vikes were only rushing four.
Isn’t that was our “stellar” defensive line is supposed to be doing? I saw a couple flashes of it during the game but for the season we haven’t been doing that. We all know this so I’m not going to beat a dead horse. While Orton was horrible for most of the night I can’t place all that blame on him, yes he made bad throws, but the oline didn’t protect him very long to get through his reads. Everyone has made valid points on what we should do, but that fact is this Orton = Jim Miller, not a great QB but a decent one. Give him something to work with (spend some money Angelo) and then maybe we’ll be able to see what we have. I’ve had enough of the QB’s coming and going. We have a great back with tons of poetential so lets keep building from there. And for god’s sake let’s accept that Devin Hester is a kick returner and put him there, we already paid him, suck it up it is what it is. Madden said it last night this year kickers are not afraid of our return game anymore.
If things came easy, then everybody would be great at what they did, let's face it.
Mike Ditka
by Ditkavsworld on Dec 1, 2008 12:30 PM CST up reply actions
No doubt
Tommie Harris is supposed to be a world beater.
Ogunleye may have ended up being a bit overrated when we got him, but we have seen him capable of getting after the QB. Same with Brown.
I don’t know why they can’t any longer.
Being Who You Thought We Were Since 2005!
Glaring defensive hole...
is at free safety. We desperately need an athletic safety in the Sean Taylor, Leron Landry, Ed Reed, Bob Sanders, Troy Polamolu type. Should we just draft every safety from USC and Miami every year until we find one? I say yes. I’m tired of seeing Peanut hung out to dry game after game after game, and not being able to play his style of football because we now play these ridiculously soft zones, where every player in coverage has 2 respectabilities…arrghhh
Forget it..
I have been beating this drum for a month but we have a love fest for Kevin Payne. Even last night he gets the pick but real play was made by Manning breaking it up. Although he was in position to get the deflection so I will give him credit for that.
If Peanut is being hung out to dry because
of our scheme that is hardly the safety’s fault is it? Unless you are saying we have to play soft zones because of our safeties.
Being Who You Thought We Were Since 2005!
Peanut was out there because
both of our safeties are strong safeties, and can’t cover deep. They are basically smaller faster linebackers that are at a mismatch against WRs. I guess I’m saying Peanut was hung out to dry by the play that was called (forcing him to act as a free safety) and by the fact that we had no one else that was good enough at deep cover to take that role on our team.
Are you referring to the 99 yard TD play?
If so, wasn’t that one his fault? He should know if he has deep help or not, in that case he did not and broke coverage before realizing it.
Speaking of that, why isn’t Tillman hammering guys at the line. Berrian is a push over if you get your hands on him. Granted you wouldn’t do that if you didn’t have help over the top, but still. Tillman and Graham are both big corners. Shouldn’t they be trying to jam some guys?
Being Who You Thought We Were Since 2005!
Yeah I am....
I know Tillman is a vet, and he owned up to the 99 yarder, but why was that coverage ever called?? Since when have we been turning our corners into glorified free safeties?
I completely agree that they should be jamming at the line. I thought thats what they did the years that Tillman and Vasher would shut teams down; now its so bad I’m second guessing what I remember…it’s like Lovie has convinced me that they are calling plays and running the exact same defense the whole time he has been there, even though the past two years the defense has looked and played completely different.
I always thought we were supposed to give up the run some, but most importantly stop the pass…
Do we have to turn Peanut into a FS for next year?
Because if we don’t try to get the guy from USC, Oregon, or Missouri we should probably change Tillman and save ourselves the heartache. I
I just had an epiphany...
Teams have said we play a Cover 3, meaning our corners and 1 safety are responsable for deep cover, splitting the field into thirds. The safety (payne or Brown) would end up covering the middle, or blitzing in run support. THIS IS WHY OUR TEAM GETS SMOKED IN THE PASSING GAME!!! We only have 3 guys to cover 8+ yard pass patterns, the rest are underneath or blitzing!!! No wonder our pass defense is f-ed!!

by 



















