The Quotable Bears (Week Fifteen)

First things first….Thanks to #23 for putting up the 2nd half game thread. Roll Call: halfblindcubbiegirl took it down with 171; bs.uf15bosox9bears23 had 142, and aznsensation wound up in third with 126.
Second, the Bears won. Sounds like we won ugly, but we won. The fake punt deal is both good and bad. I’m glad that Lovie decided to think outside the box, but I’m not sure the timing was good.
Third, Danieal Manning deserves to be returning punts and kicks for the rest of the year. End of story.
Fourth, sounds like Orton was iffy tonight. I can’t and won’t comment fully because I didn’t see the game.
Fifth, Devin Hester at WR sounds like he’ll be a good slot WR. Looking forward to seeing him once we get a true #1.
Finally, a personal rant is about to commence. This statement does not reflect the opinion of Windy City Gridiron nor its constituents:
Williams wall = Absolutely amazing. There is no such thing as responsibility in this country anymore. We see Martha Stewart go to jail because of insider trading that netted her $60,000. As I remember it (and I may be wrong, please correct me if I am), the Williams boys have a $400,000 weight loss clause in their contract. Did they really need the money that badly? I’m sorry, if you’re a professional athlete, EAT HEALTHIER. Why take a diuretic? If you legitimately need said supplement to live, it’s understandable. I doubt that’s the case. The whole thing is ridiculous.
Before you start attacking me, yes, I’d be just as pissed off if one of our Bears took a banned supplement, regardless of whether or not they knew. Ignorance of the law IS NOT AN EXCUSE. One does not need to be an attorney to know that.
Let’s get on with it before I alienate myself from everyone.
Lovie on the game:
“Offensively, we stalled there for a while. But at the end we needed to put together a couple drives, and our offense answered the call.”
Lovie on Devin being a WR:
“As a receiver, [Hester’s] gotten better and better. He’s still hard to cover when he’s in a one-on-one situation. We’ve had him open a few times and haven’t been able to get him the ball. But in the end he came through as an offensive weapon and put us in position to win.”
Love on Danieal’s return:
“He’s been showing signs of being able to break one all the way for a while. We want him to celebrate when he gets in the end zone, but we’ll work with that.”
Orton on the game:
“It just feels great. I thought we might have let one slip away and then to come back and get a big win in overtime ... We've been in the playoffs now for us basically the last two weeks and are 2-0, so it's win or go home basically. We lived to fight another day.”
Orton on the D:
“This is the best game they played all year. They really just played outstanding. [They] put pressure on the quarterback and got some turnovers for us.”
Hester on the PI call:
“It was a stutter-and-go. I froze the safety, and he bit on it. Then I just ran right past him. I was hoping [a penalty] was going to happen.”
Danieal Manning on his return TD:
“There was great blocking and I just ran. I don’t think I was touched. Honestly, I wasn’t expecting that. I was expecting good field position, but not a touchdown. I really wasn’t. But I’m happy about it and I’m going to keep improving.”
Briggs on the playoff picture:
“Huge. Absolutely huge. We can't lose. I never thought things looked bleak for us. Why? Because I believe.”
Wale on the D’s performance:
“I’m really happy with the way we showed up on defense. Things looked bleak at times, but we showed up and we played magnificent. We got some turnovers when we needed. We were getting pressure. We were stopping the run. Guys were running to the ball and I’m excited the way we came out and played. It was a game where everybody knew what we had coming in. They knew the caliber of the quarterback we had coming in and I think people were looking to see if we were for real or we were not, and I think we were looking for the same thing because we haven’t had this consistency where we were able to show up two weeks in a row.”
Wale on the William’s ruling:
“I think it's funny that a
Robbie Gould on the game:
“It's a great opportunity to get a field goal to win the game, but at the same time it's a total team effort. The offense battled back. And the coin toss went our way. The offense played well just to get the ball down in range.”
0 recs |
17 comments
|
Comments
i actually defend the williams boys and the others who tested positive
the fact of the matter is…the banned substance wasn’t listed on the bottle and the NFL knew that these supplements contained the banned substance and never informed the players or the players union, they just decided to wait and see if anyone tested positive to suspend them, that is a bullshit move and the nfl knows it.
by lopey986 on Dec 12, 2008 11:58 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
The NFL claims they did let the union know
I think that’s the crux of the case.
by Arbusto on Dec 12, 2008 12:49 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
So far all a judge has said is that there's enough evidence he can't dismiss it outright.
by Arbusto on Dec 12, 2008 12:50 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
there was too much evidence for a federal judge
with a full docket to parse through in such a short time. THATS why it got an extension.
by halfblindcubbiegirl on Dec 12, 2008 1:56 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm sure the Bears will be watching the game in Arizona this weekend...
"Charles Tillman is one of the best strippers in the NFL" - John Madden 11/30/08 Chicago Bears vs. Minnesota Vikings game
by Chanman25 on Dec 12, 2008 12:38 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I just saw your sig
maybe you should add another Madden one from this year.
Kyle Orton really likes tight ends.
Being Who You Thought We Were Since 2005!
by Adam T on Dec 12, 2008 7:53 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
hah!
I just love Al Michaels’ comment afterward: “you do mean as in he likes to fumble…right?” haha and Madden just kind of rambles and laughs at the same time
"Charles Tillman is one of the best strippers in the NFL" - John Madden 11/30/08 Chicago Bears vs. Minnesota Vikings game
by Chanman25 on Dec 12, 2008 9:41 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Mn judge ruling on MN players
It’s not a MN judge. It’s a federal judge appointed by Reagan. The district is in MN and he’s not just ruling on MN players but all of them.
I’m sure this judge has a lot to gain by allowing the Vikings players to play 4 weeks in place of his life tenure on the bench…gains are so much greater than the risk here, i suppose.
by Arbusto on Dec 12, 2008 12:51 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
lol....A+ Wale
Thanks for clarifying.
I'M A MAN! I'M 22!
by ChiFan13 on Dec 12, 2008 12:53 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
on wales quote about d:
hes right on. this was a good defensive performance, given how much time they were on the field against a good offense. I think its even more impressive being it was a short week, with little time to prepare or rest.
on ortons quote:“We’ve been in the playoffs now for us basically the last two weeks and are 2-0.”
wait a second… according to lovie I thought we had a 6 game season that started 4 weeks ago. so i guess hes really trying to forget the egg he laid in a crucial game against minnesota….
heres a question/debate for anyone: I believe that final game in houston is going to be tough if its a must win. Houston is playing inspired ball right now, and trying to play for Kubiaks job… i think its winnable, but like wale, i’ll be rooting for minnesota to loose some games coming up.
by rahulsriram on Dec 12, 2008 3:46 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Doesn't MN have to lose two games?
Even if they lose one, they’ll still have the tie – breaker, correct?
by Waylon on Dec 12, 2008 5:31 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I think so.
I haven’t done the math, and we may have matching records against common opponents if they lose to Atlanta. But two losses is definitely the better deal for us. Root against New York these next two weeks!
—d
by itsugly on Dec 12, 2008 5:50 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
yes
Bringing moderation to a place I don't moderate.
visit the mindful mission
by big_lowitzki on Dec 12, 2008 7:35 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Approved List?
Doesn’t the NFL have a list of approved substances? It appears a players is putting themselves in jeopardy unless they use substance approved by the NFL.
"The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the intelligent are full of doubt." - Bertrand Russell
by phastphil on Dec 12, 2008 10:57 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
There is no way
the league could keep an up to date list of all drugs. Some might be harmless, but the league has not been able to test them. New drugs and/or steroid concealers are always coming out. I think that would be the purpose of the making it the players responsibility. Make them call the trainer or the hotline, but the flip side is if the NFL is going to go that route that hot line must be responsive.
Being Who You Thought We Were Since 2005!
by Adam T on Dec 12, 2008 11:23 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
My Point is...........
Why risk your career with some some substance a trainer “thinks may be legal”. For the kind of money these guys are making and keeping in mind the consequences for screwing-up – the risks are too great to take a chance with any of this stuff.
"The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the intelligent are full of doubt." - Bertrand Russell
by phastphil on Dec 13, 2008 8:41 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs

by 























