Windy City Gridiron: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: Sounder At Heart for Seattle Sounders Fans!

Bears Holiday Wishlist: Players from around the league you'd like to have in '09

Ok... as the season winds down... we all naturally start to think about free agents, the draft, and next year. However, when making our wishlists for the Bears, we often neglect to add "sleeper" players from other teams... and quite frankly, so do the Bears.

It's so typical to say "I want Alan Faneca ('08)", or "I want Anquan Boldin ('09). So, I propose a challenge to you guys:

Gimme a player who's under the radar.... a guy  who's stuck behind a top draft pick or pro-bowler on somebody else's roster (kinda like Michael Turner, although he's not the best example since we all knew he was a pro-bowl caliber player).  Maybe a 3rd year WR who's due for a breakout? Or a guy who's being neglected or mis-used on his current team? 

Last off-season, the Bears were in desperate need of WRs. All we added were Brandon "Friggin" Lloyd and "Old" Marty Booker. We could've signed Antonio Bryant... but apparently had zero interest. Wow.

I'll start it off: aquire Michael Bush from Oakland in a trade to compliment Matt Forte and give us some Thunder in the backfield.

If you need some help with Free Agents, here's a link: FREE AGENTS 2009

 

3 recs  |  Comment 84 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

We'll trade you back Berrian

If you tell us the secret to Orton’s neck beard.

by Jepp The Viking on Dec 15, 2008 1:50 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

It is a combo

of Chi Pet mix and Miracle Gro.

Being Who You Thought We Were Since 2005!

by Adam T on Dec 15, 2008 1:52 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Naw, that's ok.

We’ll keep Briggs.

I'M A MAN! I'M 22!

by ChiFan13 on Dec 15, 2008 1:57 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Thanks, good post idea

I like the thought process with Bush. Bush was a draft pick just two years ago, correct? I don’t know how easily it would be to get away from Oakland.

I’ll give the topic a think and see if I can come up with anyone.

Being Who You Thought We Were Since 2005!

by Adam T on Dec 15, 2008 1:55 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Actually

he was going to be traded to the Chargers at the deadline this year for like a 5th and a 6th (I don’t really know how that deal broke up). The Raiders were even talking about moving him to FB, shows how much they value him (cough sarcasm cough). I think he would be a great power type back to pair up with Forte, and maybe the short yardage back we need.

I am like your Dan Aykroyd and biglow would be Jane, the ignorant slut. -Chad

by thecoolest on Dec 15, 2008 10:34 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

In which case

if he fits go for it.

Being Who You Thought We Were Since 2005!

by Adam T on Dec 15, 2008 11:41 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Yep.

Don’t know why the deal fell through…

I'm not going to even bother trying to update this sig everyday anymore... that's what the standings column on ESPN is for.
Updated on May 25, 2008

by SackMan on Dec 16, 2008 12:25 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Give me one of the Giants Dlineman

WIth Osi coming back next year, they will have an extra player. That whole Dline is crazy good.

by McRipper on Dec 15, 2008 2:49 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Okay with Bush

I don’t know much about him but if he is thunder like you say he must be a big guy. Forte is awesome but he does seem to have a hard time on the goal line. So someone like a Lendale White would be nice.

I still say they look at Matt Cassell, Orton’s been fine but it would be nice to have a play making quarterback only if he is not asking for too much

If they can’t get Boldin, possibly Steve Breaston from Arizona also he was good when filling in for Boldin earlier this year

by chase17 on Dec 15, 2008 4:11 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Bush was a Heisman candidate 2 years ago, but broke his leg mid-way through the year.

The Raiders drafted him with the first overall pick on day two of the 2007 draft (4th round), and red-shirted him last year. This year, he’s gotten some playing time and looked good, but the Raiders drafted McFadden and also re-signed Fargas. So, there’s a crowd in the backfield.

I'm not going to even bother trying to update this sig everyday anymore... that's what the standings column on ESPN is for.
Updated on May 25, 2008

by SackMan on Dec 15, 2008 5:02 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Can I also say that

Forte isn’t exactly lightning. He is a complete 3 down back. He isn’t a speedster.

Being Who You Thought We Were Since 2005!

by Adam T on Dec 15, 2008 11:42 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I want a power back who can complement him.

Bush is 245lbs… but can bust a move, unlike Ron Dayne, or Lendale White.

1. We suck at short yardage… more a testament of how bad our line is.
2. When Forte gets a breather, we can pound Bush (ha ha, I just said pound Bush)… and soften up the D.

I'm not going to even bother trying to update this sig everyday anymore... that's what the standings column on ESPN is for.
Updated on May 25, 2008

by SackMan on Dec 16, 2008 12:22 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Oh... BTW

Bush is also a pretty good receiver out of the backfield… so our offense wouldn’t be predictable with him in the game.

I'm not going to even bother trying to update this sig everyday anymore... that's what the standings column on ESPN is for.
Updated on May 25, 2008

by SackMan on Dec 16, 2008 12:26 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

good topic, hard to answer though

because it assumes he’s being neglected in another system but would shine in ours…. we seem to do things the other way around here (neglect guys that end up shining in other systems)

by DartmouthCubsFan on Dec 15, 2008 4:55 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

We pretty much need to win now.

The D is getting old. I say draft USC safety Taylor Mays. He’s an Adrian Wilson clone. It’s time to say bye bye to Brown. I love the guy, but it’s time.

Bolster the O Line somehow, and get a legit WR, whether it’s Boldin, Houzh, or Bryant.

Get a young, creative D Cordinator, preferably a former Bear. Hampton? Dent?

Devin Hester, you are ridiculous! -Jeff Joniak

by ARAM FOR MVP on Dec 15, 2008 6:59 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Just for the record

lets seperate Boldin, TJ and then Bryant. One is nowhere near like the others. Boldin, TJ or for some of you Burress are the guys to start. If we can’t nab one of them then maybe we look at Bryant.

Being Who You Thought We Were Since 2005!

by Adam T on Dec 15, 2008 11:43 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

BTW... some offensive lineman out there:

Vernon Carey, RT/G, Miami = Former 1st round pick… a big 350lb+ bully, played guard at the “U”, and has been starting at RT for Miami. Would definitely be a huge boost to our running game. Carey should be our TOP FA PRIORITY.

Jon Stinchcomb, RT, New Orleans = Bye-bye John St.Clair Tait, hello Mr. Stinchomb.

Harvey Dahl, RG, Atlanta = The starting RG for one of the best running teams in the NFL.

I'm not going to even bother trying to update this sig everyday anymore... that's what the standings column on ESPN is for.
Updated on May 25, 2008

by SackMan on Dec 15, 2008 7:23 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

No problem with any of them

but can we start on the left side and work our way over?

Being Who You Thought We Were Since 2005!

by Adam T on Dec 15, 2008 11:43 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

If you can find guys on the left side who are available...

We just drafted a LT… I’m assuming he’s going to play LT for us.

I'm not going to even bother trying to update this sig everyday anymore... that's what the standings column on ESPN is for.
Updated on May 25, 2008

by SackMan on Dec 16, 2008 12:18 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

BTW... this should come as no surprise to you

but, according to Football Outsiders, the Bears O-line ranks #30 out of 32 in getting stuffed in run blocking. Only Detroit and Cinci are worse in that department.

I'm not going to even bother trying to update this sig everyday anymore... that's what the standings column on ESPN is for.
Updated on May 25, 2008

by SackMan on Dec 15, 2008 7:27 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Ced... and his 3.1 YPC for 2008....

LOL.

I'm not going to even bother trying to update this sig everyday anymore... that's what the standings column on ESPN is for.
Updated on May 25, 2008

by SackMan on Dec 16, 2008 9:34 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

A couple guys I wouldn't mind seeing the Bears bring in:

RB Correll Buckhalter (sp?) – very good back when healthy, would still be pretty tough to pry away from the Igglez though

S Michael Johnson – young, versatile safety on the Giants. They probably won’t want to deal him, but they have a good deal of depth at the position

WR Maurice Stovall – ton of potential, but hasn’t been able to do anything so far. Big bodied WR might just need a change of scenery

WR Dwayne Jarrett – kind of the same story as Stovall, ton of potential, but it seems as if the Panthers might have soured on him

Those are just off the top of my head, I might come back if I could think of more.

I am like your Dan Aykroyd and biglow would be Jane, the ignorant slut. -Chad

by thecoolest on Dec 15, 2008 10:43 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

I like

Buckhalter, but his injury concerns are not worth the risk.

Stovall and Jarrett, no thanks. Nothing against them, but I want an established guy or at least one who has been productive in the league. We have plenty of could be good some day receivers.

Being Who You Thought We Were Since 2005!

by Adam T on Dec 15, 2008 11:45 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

We really don't have any "could be good someday" WRs...

Unless you count the absolute unknown: Bennett.

For that reason, I like the suggestions of Stovall and Jarrett, although I haven’t seen much of them. They’re the type of guys I want to discuss in this thread.

I'm not going to even bother trying to update this sig everyday anymore... that's what the standings column on ESPN is for.
Updated on May 25, 2008

by SackMan on Dec 16, 2008 12:16 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Fair enough

but I still want at least one established receiver.

Being Who You Thought We Were Since 2005!

by Adam T on Dec 16, 2008 9:44 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

We told Moose to take a hike this year...

And he caught more passes (54), for more yards (764), than any WR on our team. Plus… he actually blocks people downfield in the running game… something NONE of our current WRs do at all aside from Booker.

I'm not going to even bother trying to update this sig everyday anymore... that's what the standings column on ESPN is for.
Updated on May 25, 2008

by SackMan on Dec 16, 2008 9:55 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

True

I was aiming for more of a #1 receiver. Moose also had some issues holding onto the ball while here.

Being Who You Thought We Were Since 2005!

by Adam T on Dec 16, 2008 11:08 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

consistant players

I dont think it would take very much to get Tory Holt from fhe Rams. He is in the last year of his contract and you could get rid of Booker,Loyd and Davis. Lorenzo Neil would be a great addition at FB.

by luckie815 on Dec 24, 2008 6:16 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I think Buckhalter is a FA after the season

I'm not going to even bother trying to update this sig everyday anymore... that's what the standings column on ESPN is for.
Updated on May 25, 2008

by SackMan on Dec 16, 2008 12:17 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

FA v. Draft?

I wish for the bears to draft both Taylor Mays and Percy Harvin in the upcoming NFL draft. I’d be thrilled with either one of the tho… are harvin and hester too similar? do we need more of a crabtree type wr (who doesn’t)?

in neither FA nor the Draft do i have a great deal of faith in the bears… i just don’t see the bears spending the $ to land a big time FA, i just don’t see it… (not like my wish for 2 1st rounders is ever gonna happen either)

re: sleepers I like jeriuos norwood. spell rb is 1 of several areas of concern. Garrett Wolfe still intrigues me tho. percy harvin in that role…

Re the draft:
1. until the Vikings lose, i’ve given up hope for this season. it is what it is…
2. typical bears, lose so many games and not make the playoffs, but win enough games to not get a good 1st round draft pick… without which the same scenario is bound to repeat. What I’m thinking is the Lions draft Tebow if he enters the draft, altering the balance of power in the division… while the bears use their middle of the pack 1st round pick on a bust offensive lineman… matt ryan to the falcons v. chris williams to the bears

by No It All on Dec 16, 2008 9:12 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

If we can't get a top flight WR in a trade or otherwise....

I would love for us to trade up and try and get Crabtree if he comes out. If we trade up and miss on Crabtree, then we can always take the best OT, or trade down again. Percy Harvin, while great, is too small for WR for us, only because we have a stable of sub 6’ WRs that can’t break press coverage. How Hester is still strictly playing as an outside WR is ridiculous…move him all over the place and make the defense account for him AND Olsen (who already moves all over the place). Imagine adding those two wrinkles to the offense, moving Olsen AND Hester all over the formation all the time.

by escolio on Dec 16, 2008 9:34 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

If we decide to trade up in the 1st round to take a WR

I’d rather just trade our 1st round pick for Boldin. Removes the potential of a bust from the equation… and I’d rather spend the money on Boldin, instead of giving some huge signing bonus to a rookie.

If I were a GM in this league… this would pretty much be my standard 1st round draft policy…. with exceptions of course.

I'm not going to even bother trying to update this sig everyday anymore... that's what the standings column on ESPN is for.
Updated on May 25, 2008

by SackMan on Dec 16, 2008 9:38 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Maybe I just have a man crush on Crabtree, but

all I see when I look at him is Larry Ftizgerald

by escolio on Dec 16, 2008 9:40 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

So you maybe

you have a man crush on Fitz not Crabtree.

Being Who You Thought We Were Since 2005!

by Adam T on Dec 16, 2008 9:46 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I don't think

we can approach this as lets not take Harvin because he is small and we have small. Everybody on our receiver roster should not be considered when bringing in receivers. If Harvin is the best option that we can get, than get him and bring in receivers around him who are different.

Being Who You Thought We Were Since 2005!

by Adam T on Dec 16, 2008 9:47 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

current wrs (not #23)

may be 6 ft or under but other than that are not like Harvin who is a game breaker/impact player whatever u wanna call it. with Hester and Harvin on each side of the offense dfenses would not be able to play the umbrella coverage against hester (not on both sides of the field). Imagine the number of 20+ yd pass interference calls we’d get in our favor with hester and harvin….

according to most mock drafts harvin gets drafted in the late 1st round, making him easier to get than crabtree who is projected top 5

“If Harvin is the best option that we can get, than get him and bring in receivers around him who are different.” isn’t this the strategy they should be using re: hester, now? i guess my ? is would harvin be different enough to compliment hester or are they too similar?

by No It All on Dec 16, 2008 10:06 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Just gonna throw this out there...

Orton isn’t exactly known for his superb accuracy in the mid-to-long range.
If he’s our QB for the long-term… it would be nice to have a tall target who can go up and get some bad throws.

I'm not going to even bother trying to update this sig everyday anymore... that's what the standings column on ESPN is for.
Updated on May 25, 2008

by SackMan on Dec 16, 2008 10:11 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I can't argue that

I just don’t want to pass over a better receiver to get one that matches Orton. If Orton can’t make the throw, than we need to find somebody who can.

Being Who You Thought We Were Since 2005!

by Adam T on Dec 16, 2008 11:09 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Bottom line is

We need someone that can create some separation from a defender who can catch (unlike #23). I still say go for Boldin even though he may be expensive. Get him and mix in the Lloyds, Hesters, Bennetts, etc.. and it will be a huge upgrade with our TE mix. Then bolster the Oline and you have something.

by tfrabotta on Dec 16, 2008 4:23 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I don't care so much about price

We end up wasting money on receivers who aren’t any good. Might as well spend it on one who is. The only two positions, barring a decision at QB, that I want to see the Bears spend money on is OL and WR.

We can address D through the draft and if any money is left some mid range pick ups.

Being Who You Thought We Were Since 2005!

by Adam T on Dec 17, 2008 11:12 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

That's exactly what needs to happen..

Bears trade their first pick for Boldin…however, who would throw him the ball? and who would block for the man throwing him the ball?? We have so many holes on this team that as much as I’d love Boldin I’d rather trade our pick for multiple picks…kind of like we did the year we got Hester.

by Glen Bishop on Dec 16, 2008 10:56 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I'm tired of multiple picks

all it seems to be getting us is special teams players and depth. I want to start bringing in some top notch talent.

Get Boldin if you can, then build around him. If you only spend FA money on Boldin and offensive line, the offense gets significantly better.

We have everybody on the D signed, so the money should be there. Use what is left of the draft to get D.

Being Who You Thought We Were Since 2005!

by Adam T on Dec 16, 2008 11:11 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Think about

having Boldin, Forte, Olsen On offense. Pretty damn good. You can put anybody on the other side. Williams with a years experience at LT, new guard and we may have something. Not that worried about Orton, I have seen enough of a spark to see if the team around him improves he will improve with it.

by tfrabotta on Dec 16, 2008 4:27 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I'm cool with that

I still want to see them address the line though.

Olsen gets better automatically by giving him better receivers and a line. Whether he can take the next step on his own, I don’t know.

Being Who You Thought We Were Since 2005!

by Adam T on Dec 17, 2008 11:13 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Also, KERRY RHODES!!!!!! How great would that be...

then we wouldn’t have to draft a safety with a high pick, and Payne and Brown could split time at SS.

by escolio on Dec 16, 2008 9:38 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

I think it might be time to

offer Brown a coaching job.

Being Who You Thought We Were Since 2005!

by Adam T on Dec 16, 2008 9:48 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I think we already have Darren Sproles on our team...

Are coaches just don’t know it.

I'm not going to even bother trying to update this sig everyday anymore... that's what the standings column on ESPN is for.
Updated on May 25, 2008

by SackMan on Dec 16, 2008 9:42 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Love the Idea but....

I saw marques Colston on the list as a restricted free agent and damn near had a heart attack but then i realized that it is not updated as to signings but to the best of my knowledge Tackles:Jordan Black,Vernon Carey,Marvel Smith,Tra Thomas all havent been signed and Guards:Jahri Evans is an RFA and would be a significant upgrade over beekman although I’d sign Carey or Smith and move St Clair over to guard to help tutor Williams next year. The Cards are supposedly looking for at least a 1,3 and a 5 for
boldin which is col with me…. Patrick Chung from Oregon is another guy that the bears should look at to team with Payne and Steltz and Mcgowan.

by scespy12 on Dec 16, 2008 12:58 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Boldin, Boldin, Boldin, Boldin, Boldin

Did I say that enough? Give em a 2010 first round and whatever to get that guy in house. Does it all catch , run, block..awesome. The problem with some of those Olineman is that I am not sure they are any better than Garza or an up and coming Beekman. 2009 first round pick is a stud off guard to drop right in at either spot. We an get a back up rb anywhere late in draft or FA pickup. But someone with speed. Derrick Ward unrestricted FA??

by tfrabotta on Dec 16, 2008 1:39 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

They would probably want this year's first rounder

They will assume with Boldin and another year experience for Forte will make the pick too low. Get it now while it is middle of the pack.

Being Who You Thought We Were Since 2005!

by Adam T on Dec 17, 2008 11:15 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

except

They may not be able to afford to pay 2 first rounders this year.

by tfrabotta on Dec 18, 2008 1:59 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

maybe, I am not familiar

with their cap situation. Though with 2 Firsts they can package them and trade up if they want or move back down and pick up more picks later. Still more valuable.

Being Who You Thought We Were Since 2005!

by Adam T on Dec 18, 2008 2:45 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Not to bad of an idea

But Beekman got his job by default and grarza isnt going aywhere but any of the guys on that list are better than john tait at this point and this yar seems like a weak guard draft a good tackle draft with about 5 teams that will draft below us that have already got the left tackle or right tackle spot filled so we my get a great deal on one of the tackles out there so we would have a good tackle tandem then we need to get some sort of reciever that can catch the damn ball!

And Seriously lay off KO… Tony Romo came in a couple of years ago and was less accurate and threw way more interceptions than kyle, yeah kyle has had some bad games lately but he has shown the ability to be great! if he gets blocking on a consistent basis and a half decent reciever he will be a pro bowler for sure!

by scespy12 on Dec 16, 2008 2:12 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

I could care less about Kyle's numbers...

all that matters is the “C” on his uniform (something Rex NEVER got) and the number of W’s

by escolio on Dec 16, 2008 6:45 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

if we want a top WR, the draft probably isn't our friend

it usually takes WRs a few years to develop. a few do it very quickly (boldin, fitzgerald, colston, etc.), but its really risky. better to spend the money and buy a proven one. boldin is worth a #1 and something, but we need to hold on to a few first day picks because we have some needs. like an athletic FS. either we move tillman back there and draft a DB early (1st/2nd round), or draft a FS early. we also need more help on the O-line. either draft or sign a RT – tait is near the end of his run. hopefully williams will be good on the left side next year. finally, our d-line needs work. wale is done as a very good end. either restructure his deal or cut him, then either draft or buy a top edge rusher. OR, get a big DT that can play the run and create pressure. i’m talking about a pat williams-like DT. that would help free up tommie harris, and everyone else on the d-line. and finally…it is painfully obvious this year that our coaches are not up to par. at the very least, babich needs to go. we have stubbornly stuck to a defense that doesn’t work with our players most of the time. we should have had our DBs playing more physical during the TB game and onwards, when it became obvious our DL couldn’t get pressure on short drops. we have the worst blitzes in the league. and turner is so damn inconsistent. he has great games, terrible games, and great and terrible parts of games. lovie should be on thin ice, too. he stays because the organization won’t eat his contract. but the others need to go. and lovie has lost the right to pick whoever he wants as coaches.

by guy incognito on Dec 16, 2008 7:29 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Statistically very few

rookie WRs make a big impact. I’m not interested in sitting through and another guy gets used to the position at this level. We are already waiting on Hester. I want a guy who we can plug in now, somewhere near his prime and lets move forward.

Boldin by default makes the rest of our receivers better. Not saying that is the only move we should make at receiver, but it does lessen the coverage and attention they get.

Being Who You Thought We Were Since 2005!

by Adam T on Dec 17, 2008 11:17 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Housh

I know he’s not under the radar really, but I can’t think of anyone who’ll be a FA next year that’s behind someone else more prominent. Boldin of course would be my first choice. But I think Housh is worth every penny he’d ask for as well. He is big, can separate, and can catch. Exactly what we need. We need a receiver that get off press coverage and catch a pass that might not be exactly where it should be on a consistent basis. My god, if the guy can catch 90+ balls from Ryan Fitzpatrick and no running game, imagine what he could do here.

The Michael Bush suggestion is great. I think that guy would be awesome splitting carries with Forte.

On another note. Would you want Chicago picking up Plaxico Burress (for cheap)?

by Subotai on Dec 18, 2008 8:12 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Yes

Kick it to me... I'm open!

by #23 on Dec 18, 2008 9:44 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Absolutely NO Burress!?

If we get Burress, we might as well pick up Antonio Bryant, Chris Henry, and trade for Pacman Jones and Tank Johnson from the Cowboys. We absolutely do not need to combine players with a history of problems with the law that also have problems listening to their coaches with a player’s coach such as Lovie Smith. Lovie would get walked all over by Plax, or anyone else who is crazy (such as the aforementioned players).

Also, we need another RB besides Micheal Bush. And if we were to get Bush, he would absolutely need to turned into an H-back to maximize his pass catching and speed in combination with his size, and then we would need another back too. Darren Sproles!!! Could you imagine being able to chose between Manning, Hester, and Sproles to return kicks?!! It would allow us to rotate them through and prevent teams from game planning for 1 returner, and instead plan for 3!!

by escolio on Dec 18, 2008 9:44 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

How many RBs do you plan on carrying on your roster?

Forte’s our #1
Bush is our discussed addition
Peterson is our special teams ace and adequate back-up
Wolfe is already on the fringe

So… where’s room fir another?

I'm not going to even bother trying to update this sig everyday anymore... that's what the standings column on ESPN is for.
Updated on May 25, 2008

by SackMan on Dec 18, 2008 12:43 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Wolfe

is nothing more than a good ST player. He is not going to be a feature back or used for more than situational play. The Bears kept Kevin Jones off the roster, so they can help the ST and Wolfe still saw not more playing time than before.

If the Bears don’t resign Jones and they have an opportunity to bring in Bush and actually use him then Wolfe get sacrificed.

The Bears can and should carry 4 RBs if two of them are primary players on ST.

Being Who You Thought We Were Since 2005!

by Adam T on Dec 18, 2008 1:29 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Sacrifice Peterson not Wolfe

Peterson is getting older, Wolfe is making plays all game long on special teams. At this point I think he is more valuable. He is one of the backs on punts and can be used for a fake when necessary. He has been lightning down the field covering kicks and making tackles, and he can be a back up returner. Although Peterson use to be a special teams ace, I would say that Wolfe is contributing more and he is cheaper. Either one of them would end up being the third back on that roster.

Kick it to me... I'm open!

by #23 on Dec 20, 2008 10:10 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Housh will be 32 years old next September

Boldin will be 29 next October…

I'm not going to even bother trying to update this sig everyday anymore... that's what the standings column on ESPN is for.
Updated on May 25, 2008

by SackMan on Dec 18, 2008 12:47 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Break the bank for Boldin.

I like Housh, but I’d rather have Boldin. Boldin is worth breaking the bank for. Do whatever, pay whatever for that man. I didn’t take in to account how old Housh will be. He is a bit old to drop a boatload of money on. Too similar to Moose. He’s awesome. but for how much longer.

All this talk about Boldin. He might not want to come to CHI. It’s cold. He’s from Florida, played at FSU, and then is playing in Arizona, all warm weather/Dome. Wonder how he’d like that Chicago weather?

by Subotai on Dec 18, 2008 6:40 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

is boldin worth the price?

i’ve got to imagine the cards will want 2 #1’a, and will probably settle for a 1st and 2nd, or a 1st, 3rd, and 4th. that is a HELL of a lot to give up for a team with as many needs to fill (RT, DE, DT, FS, CB, WR) as us, any of which we could conceivably get in the early rounds of the draft. boldin is a beast, definitely, but i think it’d be too much if it was more than a 1st and 3rd.

by guy incognito on Dec 18, 2008 6:56 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Boldin is absolutely worth the price

He has speed and size.

To follow your point, does his value or ability go down if he isn’t playing next to Fitz? Fair question. I think he can. If we get Boldin we either need Hester to develop into or get a guy like a Welker or Stokley. A fast guy who knows how to take advantage of the holes Boldin has created.

Being Who You Thought We Were Since 2005!

by Adam T on Dec 19, 2008 7:38 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

i think boldin is awesome anywhere

fitz or no fitz, he’s going to get his. again, i think 2 first day picks is a fair price for him, but i just don’t know if we can afford it, considering our many holes.

by guy incognito on Dec 19, 2008 11:44 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Good points.

I think realistically we need to get the OL moving as #1 priority. WR and DE as #2 priority.

Sometimes you can’t do it all in one year. Last year we took a good step. OL, Safety, DT, & RB positions got at minimum good depth and likely starters. We still may have a shot at a WR & CB in Bennet and Bowman as well from that draft. That is not counting Hanie, depending on if you feel the guy has any potential to help the team win in the future.

This season hopefully we can do the same and add 3-4 good fixes and 2 more with some good potential.

Kick it to me... I'm open!

by #23 on Dec 20, 2008 10:16 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

value vs. talent

I got 2 words for you ………..JON KITNA i know it sounds lame at first but think. we can give him the running game and time to pass detroit could not. Hes gonna be cheaper than cassell. he knows our divisional opponents defenses. point 2) trade draft picks for boldin and michael bush. (1,5,6) bring in stichcomb from saints, fire babich, fire turner, put lovie on notice and make our overpriced defense play for lovies job. see you in the 09-10 superbowl my friends

by WavyGravy on Dec 19, 2008 9:40 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

That is a horrible idea

I don’t mean to diss anyone trying.

- Ron Turner will stay and should stay. The worst thing we could do to Orton’s development is make him learn a new offense. Turner has had some bright moments this year and is much more creative than we have seen in past seasons. He is actually using the strength of most players on the team like moving Olsen around and giving him jump balls, using Forte out of the backfield as an extension of the running game, and mixing up the play calling on first down. Some games we actually pass more than run. Sometimes we should have ran, but at least he is a little less predictable. If he would can the full back dive, he is doing a solid job this year.

- Babich can go and that may happen. It is obvious to me though that the players aren’t getting the job done though, so it is hard to pin it all on him. With that said, the guy still doesn’t seem to be very good. I love the Marinelli idea and thought the same thing myself a few years ago. Love and Marinelli coached together in Tampa and have a relationship and Marinelli got to be a head coach because he was a good defensive coordinator. That sounds like a good marriage.

- Jon Kitna is a joke. You might as well keep Rex. That guy turns the ball over all the time. And you can point to Mike Martz, but the guy had Roy Williams, Calvin Johnson, and Looker at WR which is a good group and had Kevin Jones in the backfield last season. He is a turnover machine and that goes against our coaching philosophy. Also, Mike Martz made Kitna look better than he is. He does that with all his QB’s. Look at Bulger and Kitna’s drop off after he left. They plummeted into nothingness. Yeah he is cheaper than Cassell and he is also never going to be better. We have seen the best of Kitna and it isn’t that good. Cassell is still progressing.

- I agree that Stinchcomb is very good lineman and worth having, but isn’t Guard the position on the line we need the most help? We get no push up the middle on good defenses. That keeps us out of the endzone and makes third and short very tough. With that said it is still hard to pass up a good player on a line that needs to improve.

- I think for Boldin you are talking 3 draft picks, probably a 1, 3 & 4 or a 1 & 2 & 6. For Bush you are probably talking a 2 or 3. I would be fine with 3 picks for Boldin or one pick for Bush, but not both players and using 4. Now if you used 4 picks and got Boldin and a OL or DE, I would be fine with that. Backup running back is more of a luxury considering our other more pressing needs.

Kick it to me... I'm open!

by #23 on Dec 20, 2008 10:36 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

So some FA's I would like to see

QB – Cassell, Garcia, Warner, and Rex – Ok, so that is a handful and a great place to start debates. We all know why on Cassell. For Garcia and Warner it would be about wining it all now which I believe both could do. It would hurt our chances to keep Orton though but it could mean a Superbowl if we made other good moves this offseason. Both would need a #1 receiver brought in. Now for Rex. He makes a great backup. For real he does. He knows are system and isn’t as bad as you all think. He isn’t the fumble monster, his receivers have sucked, and the running game and OL last season was abysmal. With Forte, the good pass blocking we’ve seen this year, and adding a #1 receiver, Rex would be a huge plus at backup QB. He could even push to take the job from Orton if his accuracy doesn’t get better. Rex would put up a lot of points with that team.

RB – Fred Taylor – the guy would be a great backup and might be cheep considering that Shaun Alexander and Kevin Jones and Cedric Benson and Rudi Johnson had hard times finding jobs last season

RB – Correll Buckhalter – He has about 3 years left in him and is a great backup. He can catch which is a plus.

FB – Lorenzon Neal – Um, can you say LT. Yeah this guy helped make LT a monster. LT is good on his own, but a guy like Neal is super valuable. I would take him over any other running back. You could probably add at least .5 yards per rush onto any running back he block for, maybe more.

Kick it to me... I'm open!

by #23 on Dec 20, 2008 10:55 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

I also like

WR – Antonio Bryant

Kick it to me... I'm open!

by #23 on Dec 20, 2008 11:00 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

I have a feeling

that he’s gonna get locked up on a long term deal w/ TB. If he does somehow manage to get to FA, I wouldn’t mind the Bears pursuing him. I’m not sure if this year was a fluke year. He has a lot of talent, but always seems to get in trouble.

I am like your Dan Aykroyd and biglow would be Jane, the ignorant slut. -Chad

by thecoolest on Dec 21, 2008 6:55 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Braylon Edwards?

He recently suggested he would like a change of scenery, the Browns have a lot of needs so there are probably a few ways we could match up.

Derrick Rose-2009 ROTY Tyrus Thomas-2009 MIP...hope I'm at least half right

by CHCOWNTHECENTRAL on Dec 21, 2008 7:21 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

I'd love to have him

But if he’s whining about being in Cleveland, wouldn’t he hate it here more?

And besides, all those drops scare me a little.

I am like your Dan Aykroyd and biglow would be Jane, the ignorant slut. -Chad

by thecoolest on Dec 21, 2008 6:53 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, but the guy is huge. A big receiver is so valuable.

I can’t explain all the drops this year, but he caught everything last season. He must have the Moose “I don’t feel like playing today” Blues

Kick it to me... I'm open!

by #23 on Dec 21, 2008 7:48 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

He doesn't like being in Cleveland because

he feels that he isn’t appreciated because he is a Michigan Alum and most Browns fans are Ohio State fans…I’m sure the losing is starting to get to him too but hopefully we finally have our qb

Derrick Rose-2009 ROTY Tyrus Thomas-2009 MIP...hope I'm at least half right

by CHCOWNTHECENTRAL on Dec 22, 2008 5:38 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Edwards

might have the worst hands in the league. We already have a bunch of WRs that can’t catch. Why add another?

by McRipper on Dec 22, 2008 8:46 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome Grabowskis, to SB Nation's blog about everything Chicago Bears.

Community Guidelines
Start posting about the Bears »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Did they miss the bus?
Windycity_small
WCG Survey
Windycity_small
Big Doings at WCG
Small
Lovie Smith iz Stoopid and Fire Him We Should
Blake_again_small
Let's Face The Facts............All Day Long.....................
610x_small
My keys to victory over Cardinals
Small
2010 O-Line Help in Draft? Unlikely
Medium_matt-forte_small
An interesting video!
Jimmcmahon_small
Olin Kreutz is one of the dirtiest players in the NFL
Andrew602_avatar_small
Ask Revenge of the Birds

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

Behind the Steel Curtain
BTSC Weekly NFL Musings - Week 9 Edition
Blogging The Boys
Understudy Sunday: the Cowboys Outslug the Eagles 20-16
Blogging The Boys
Cowboys First In East, Beat Philly 20-16

SPONSORS


General Manager/ Head Coach

Windycity_small Adam T

Les-miles-bears-2_small Dane Noble

Assistant Head Coach

Briggsie_small ChiFan13

Position Coaches

Evalltheway_small SackMan

Leelee_n_laylor_bff wiltfongjr