Darrell Jackson???

by diehardbearfan on Mar 17, 2008 9:33 AM CDT

Well fellas there is another free agent WR out there now since he was cut by the 49ers, just wondering if any of you are interested in the bears taking a look at him. I think they should bring him in and give him a chance personally. I don't think there are any WR's out there that could be successful with the 49ers, so maybe he wouldn't be all that bad. I don't know. I am just looking for anything to post about since free agency has slowed down now and the bears aren't doing too much for us fans to talk about. Plus, since the bears apparently are in the mood to save money, I think that he would come pretty cheap, maybe he would take a one year deal or something. Obviously though it doesn't matter how many good or bad receivers the bears bring in until they fix the O-line and RB situation, but at least WR would be one less thing the bears have to worry about drafting on the first day.

Tweet Comment 4 comments | 0 recs |

Do you like this story?

Comments

No hands!

I think Moose has better hands than Jackson and that's terrible.

GO BEARS!!!!!

by McRipper on Mar 17, 2008 10:21 AM CDT reply actions

Depends on the money.

Has the dropsies and is injury-prone, but I took a chance on him in 2006, and he performed like a No. 1 WR (fantasy-wise). If he's cheap enough*, why not?

*I have no idea what "cheap enough" would actually mean in dollars.

by tyger1147 on Mar 17, 2008 12:32 PM CDT reply actions

Noooooooooooo!

Jackson is D-O-N-E. Better off signing Wayne Chrebet.

by Doctor Chicago on Mar 17, 2008 2:38 PM CDT reply actions

why o why

do we get rid of not exceptional, but decent talent at the WR position, weird. Welker would be a nice anchor scince Moose sank and B Twice jumped ship. Even Proel won a superbowl and wasent all that bad in carolina. Dont get me wrong not saying that they are #1 reciever caliber but 120 catches isint bad (Welker behind Moss and Stallworth).

by SuperBowlXX on Mar 17, 2008 4:03 PM CDT reply actions