Windy City Gridiron: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
New Blog: Once A Metro covering Red Bull New York!

Darrell Jackson???

Well fellas there is another free agent WR out there now since he was cut by the 49ers, just wondering if any of you are interested in the bears taking a look at him.  I think they should bring him in and give him a chance personally.  I don't think there are any WR's out there that could be successful with the 49ers, so maybe he wouldn't be all that bad.  I don't know.  I am just looking for anything to post about since free agency has slowed down now and the bears aren't doing too much for us fans to talk about.  Plus, since the bears apparently are in the mood to save money, I think that he would come pretty cheap, maybe he would take a one year deal or something.  Obviously though it doesn't matter how many good or bad receivers the bears bring in until they fix the O-line and RB situation, but at least WR would be one less thing the bears have to worry about drafting on the first day.

0 recs  |  Comment 4 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

No hands!
I think Moose has better hands than Jackson and that's terrible.
GO BEARS!!!!!

by McRipper on Mar 17, 2008 10:21 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Depends on the money.
Has the dropsies and is injury-prone, but I took a chance on him in 2006, and he performed like a No. 1 WR (fantasy-wise). If he's cheap enough*, why not?

*I have no idea what "cheap enough" would actually mean in dollars.

by tyger1147 on Mar 17, 2008 12:32 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Noooooooooooo!
Jackson is D-O-N-E. Better off signing Wayne Chrebet.

by Doctor Chicago on Mar 17, 2008 2:38 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

why o why
do we get rid of not exceptional, but decent talent at the WR position, weird. Welker would be a nice anchor scince Moose sank and B Twice jumped ship. Even Proel won a superbowl and wasent all that bad in carolina. Dont get me wrong not saying that they are #1 reciever caliber but 120 catches isint bad (Welker behind Moss and Stallworth).

by SuperBowlXX on Mar 17, 2008 4:03 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Windy City Gridiron is the best independent site on the internet for breaking news, in-depth analysis, and hardcore discussion about the Chicago Bears

Community Guidelines
Start posting about the Bears »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

Comcast NFL RedZone Moments from SB Nation

FanPosts

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

SPONSORS

SBNation.com Recent Stories

Photo link

A Deeper Look At The 2009 Cowboys Running Game

Photo +1 updates

Rams, Redskins Showing Interest In QB Sam Bradford

Photo +2 updates

Scot McCloughan Confirms He Is Out At 49ers GM

More from SBNation.com >


Managers

Windycity_small Adam T

Photo_small Dane Noble

Editor

19554_711053815498_20723723_41499369_7695586_n_small HoneyBear

Contributing Writers

19936057_m_medium_small MuleTrain

Evalltheway_small SackMan

Bears_small Sklz711

Attachment27_small Lester A. Wiltfong Jr.

Bow-icon_small smudgers

Chicago-bears-logo_small Mark Saade

N506182155_130313_2606_small Kev H