Windy City Gridiron: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:





2008 NFL Draft - Day 1

 

Welcome to day one of the draft!

 

The Chicago Bears select Chris Williams, Offensive Tackle, Vanderbilt!


The Chicago Bears select Matt Forte, Running Back, Tulane

 

 

2008 NFL Draft- Bears Selections
Round Pick Player Pos. College
1 14 Chris Williams OT Vaderbilt
2 44 Matt Forte RB Tulane
3 70 -- -- --
3 90 -- -- --
4 110 -- -- --
5 142 -- -- --
6 175 -- -- --
7 222 -- -- --
7 243 -- -- --
7 247 -- -- --
7 248 -- -- --

 

2008 NFL Draft - Round 1
Pick Team Player Pos. College
1 Miami Dolphins Jake Long OT Michigan
2 St. Louis Rams Chris Long DE UVA
3 Atlanta Falcons Matt Ryan QB Boston College
4 Oakland Raiders Darren McFadden RB Arkansas
5 Kansas City Cheifs Glenn Dorsey DT LSU
6 New York Jets Vernon Gholston DE Ohio State
7 New Orlens Saints Sedrick Ellis DT USC
8 Jacksonville Jaguars Derrick Harvey DE Florida
9 Cinncinati Bengals Keith Rivers LB USC
10 New England Patriots Jerod Mayo LB Tennessee
11 Buffalo Bills Leodis McKelvin CB Troy
12 Devner Broncos -- -- --
13 Carolina Panthers -- -- --
14 Chicago Bears -- -- --
15 Detroit Lions -- -- --
16 Arizona Cardinals -- -- --
17 Kansas City Chiefs -- -- --
18 Houston Texans -- -- --
19 Philadelpia Eagles -- -- --
20 Tampa Bay Buccaneers -- -- --
21 Washington Redskins -- -- --
22 Dallas Cowboys -- -- --
23 Pittsburgh Steelers -- -- --
24 Tenneessee Titans -- -- --
25 Seattle Seahawks -- -- --
26 Baltimore Ravens -- -- --
27 San Diego Chargers -- -- --
28 Dallas Cowboys -- -- --
29 San Franciso 49ers -- -- --
30 Green Bay Packers -- -- --
31 New York Giants -- -- --

0 recs | Comment 1117 comments

Read Related

Story-email Email | Print |

Comments

Display:

I can’t wait for this to get started. Here is what I think it going to happen today:

1) Jeff Otah
2) Brian Brohm

I looked through several Mock Drafts that were updated as of yesterday, and there are some interesting options. Most of them have the Bears going with Otah, and if they don’t, the other majority was Mendenhall. I think I’d be happy with either since we could use both.

The second round will be interesting. I’d think that if Brohm dropped past the Ravens which is now expected, that he’d fall into the second round at least. If he was there, I’d see no reason not to pick him up unless there is a good RB there.

Some Mock Drafts had the Bears going with Dennis Dixon and John David Booty in the third or fourth round. That’d be interesting.

I think one thing is for sure. The first three rounds will include a O-Line pick, a RB, QB and WR. That would use up all four of our 1-3 round picks.

Okay, enough rambling. Just four more hours…

"Don't take anything for granted, because tomorrow is not promised to any of us."

by Twins Territory on Apr 26, 2008 9:53 AM CDT   0 recs

First Five...

It looks like it’ll be something like this one through five:

1) Jake Long
2) Chris Long
3) Matt Ryan
4) Glen Dorsey
5) Darren McFadden

"Don't take anything for granted, because tomorrow is not promised to any of us."

by Twins Territory on Apr 26, 2008 10:28 AM CDT   0 recs

I really hope we can get Otah or Mendenhall in the first and Brohm in the second. That’d be a nice first day IMO. Then in the third we could get whatever we don’t take in the first (RB or OL) and a WR. I can’t wait to have the weekend over and see what we have. I wish the whole thing was today.

"Don't take anything for granted, because tomorrow is not promised to any of us."

by Twins Territory on Apr 26, 2008 10:29 AM CDT   0 recs

O-line

I might be in the minority here, but I think we need to go Tackle, Guard in rounds 1 and 2. Then in 3+ take the skill guys. We need 2 O-line starters not just one (unless the mysterious, un-used Beekman is any good). A good line makes all the difference. See Cleveland last year vs the many, many years before.

by MuleTrain on Apr 26, 2008 10:36 AM CDT   0 recs

What’s the over-under on SB*Nation going down during the draft – pick four?

Otah / Brohm might be the ideal scenario, but I don’t see Brohm lasting until 44.

Going Tackle/Guard 14/44 wouldn’t be terrible either.

The worst-case scenario is probably Mendenhall (one year wonder) / Henne (always sucked, still sucks), but it wouldn’t surprise me if they went that route either.

Insert clever and witty remark slash pun here!

by ES46NE10 on Apr 26, 2008 10:45 AM CDT   0 recs

whoa whoa whoa

mendenhall a one year wonder? c’mon dude, he didn’t start as a soph but posted an 8.2 ypc which led to him being the starter as a junior.

and henne hardly sucks, just can’t stay healthy. great football iq, but no matter who we pick at QB they probably won’t be ready for 2 years or so.

by lopey986 on Apr 26, 2008 12:37 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

I guess

O-line, RB, WR, O-line in the first 3 rounds….

unless Flacco or Brohm are available in the 2nd round….

Visit The NEW Cub Reporter (thecubreporter.com)

by thecubreporter on Apr 26, 2008 10:51 AM CDT   0 recs

I'm pumped.

I bet it will be O-line in round one but if they pull out a trick and take a Mendenhall, I will be happy. I also am willing to bet $50 that Jake Long goes number 1, hahahaha.

Hey WCG did you get at least 10 entries for the Draft Challenge?

by GallopingGhost on Apr 26, 2008 11:08 AM CDT   0 recs

No

I have about 4 for each. I am still keeping score for bragging rights though.

Being Who You Thought We Were Since 2005!

by WCG on Apr 26, 2008 11:12 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

I think

I’ll have about 4 right in the first round. Counting Jake Long. Which would be on par with most mock drafts.

by Doctor Chicago on Apr 26, 2008 12:08 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

I'll take that bet,

if you bet me $51 that St. Louis takes Chris Long.

"I can accept failure, but I can't accept not trying" - Michael Jordan, the one and only...

by LPLancer23 on Apr 26, 2008 11:20 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Let me rephrase that,

I think St. Louis will take C. Long. I dont think I was clear on that. lol.

"I can accept failure, but I can't accept not trying" - Michael Jordan, the one and only...

by LPLancer23 on Apr 26, 2008 11:21 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

It seems like

the Saints trade involving Jamaal Brown so they can move up to get Glenn Dorsey probably isn’t going to happen, so if the Rams stay at 2 the obvious choice is Chris Long.

by Doctor Chicago on Apr 26, 2008 12:26 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

I think this all BS

Jake Long going first? How unrealistic! I quit!!!! (that is my best impression of Tyger)

by tempchad on Apr 26, 2008 12:20 PM CDT   0 recs

that was tomas21

tyger is super lame too though

“Your wrong and you are stupid for being wrong however, I will not post any counter claims to why you are wrong or why I am right, I will just make curt comments about you”
Thats my best tyger impersonation.

-leopoldjones

by leopoldjones on Apr 26, 2008 12:25 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Whoops

my bad. I take it back

by tempchad on Apr 26, 2008 12:36 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

This is just

a smokescreen from the Dolphins, throwing out false news stories about signing Jake Long. Classic Parcells.

by Doctor Chicago on Apr 26, 2008 12:28 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

How would you all feel

if say Albert fell to 14 for the Bears and they had the chance to get Sam Baker in the 2nd? Would you be willing to bypass RB,QB,WR if we could bolster T and G?

Being Who You Thought We Were Since 2005!

by WCG on Apr 26, 2008 12:24 PM CDT   1 recs

I like that

I think pegleg benson could be good behind a good line

-leopoldjones

by leopoldjones on Apr 26, 2008 12:26 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

If that happened

and Forte was still there at the top of the 3rd, I’d pass out.

by Doctor Chicago on Apr 26, 2008 12:29 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

I wouldn't take

back to back o-lineman. Albert in the first would be ok, but i don’t like baker at all. I’d rather have a running back or trade up to get a big name QB than take Baker in the second.

I am like your Dan Aykroyd and biglow would be Jane, the ignorant slut. -Chad

by thecoolest on Apr 26, 2008 12:32 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Ok, substitue Baker

with the second ol of your choice. Interested?

Being Who You Thought We Were Since 2005!

by WCG on Apr 26, 2008 12:37 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

I don't see franchise

besides Jake Long, I don’t see the can’t miss anchor tackle in this draft. Otah, Clady, Williams, they are not Orlando Pace or Jonathan Ogden. Therefore, get one in the second round!

by tempchad on Apr 26, 2008 12:36 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Ok

is there anybody out there, who isn’t looking for the Bears to take RB or OL?

Being Who You Thought We Were Since 2005!

by WCG on Apr 26, 2008 12:38 PM CDT   0 recs

with angelo

we could go defense.

by lopey986 on Apr 26, 2008 12:39 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

I'm goingt punter all the way

who is this years ray guy

-leopoldjones

by leopoldjones on Apr 26, 2008 12:40 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

I don't see it

unless a stud drops down. He has pretty much said he will go offense.

Being Who You Thought We Were Since 2005!

by WCG on Apr 26, 2008 12:39 PM CDT   0 recs

i know i know

i’m hopin for mendenhall, love to have a u of i stud in our backfield. o-line seems to be the popular vote right now, i just hope if we do go o-line that guy is ready to come in and start from jump, because that is what we need and that is why i was an advocate of us signing a few fa lineman. it is easier to bolster an o-line in the short term through FA…and you can get good long term o-lineman later in the draft therefore you use your early picks on skill position players.

by lopey986 on Apr 26, 2008 12:46 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Its being reported

that St. Louis has decided to take Chris Long, so another pick we can’t anticipate.

Being Who You Thought We Were Since 2005!

by WCG on Apr 26, 2008 12:57 PM CDT   0 recs

Both

whoever has what I am more interested in hearing.

PS- Auto refresh rocks!

Being Who You Thought We Were Since 2005!

by WCG on Apr 26, 2008 12:58 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

McShay

just said he thinks Ryan, Flacco, Henne and Brohm all go in the first round.

And Dikta is talking about the 65 Bears draft, what kind of prediction is that?

Being Who You Thought We Were Since 2005!

by WCG on Apr 26, 2008 1:00 PM CDT   0 recs

maybe he is predicting

we will get two hall of famers in this draft a la ‘65.

by lopey986 on Apr 26, 2008 1:06 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Actually

his prediction is that nobody will have a draft like that. Well, duh! How often is a team going to get players the caliber of Butkus and Sayers? That is once in a lifetime situation.

Being Who You Thought We Were Since 2005!

by WCG on Apr 26, 2008 1:09 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

when is the last time

anyone got 2 hall of famers in the same draft? ‘65 seems like a safe bet…

by lopey986 on Apr 26, 2008 1:10 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Seriously

I have this brand new 47” flat screen. Yet, I am still watching the draft on a 25 with all the crap ESPN has floating around the edges.

Being Who You Thought We Were Since 2005!

by WCG on Apr 26, 2008 1:07 PM CDT   0 recs

exactly.

plus, if you get the HD channel you get an even smaller picture because they have HUGE blue bars on both sides of the friggin picture, it is absurd.

by lopey986 on Apr 26, 2008 1:09 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

I don't have

bars on the side on ESPN just junk.

The NFLN is it even really HD? I have bars on the side for that channel.

Being Who You Thought We Were Since 2005!

by WCG on Apr 26, 2008 1:10 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

They may not be broadcasting the draft in hd

if you see bars on the side you are watching standard def on a HD channel.

And you are right, auto refresh is awesome.

by tempchad on Apr 26, 2008 1:12 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

They took away

NFLN in HD on my cable system.

by Doctor Chicago on Apr 26, 2008 1:16 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Stretch button?

I don’t think I have that and if I did, wouldn’t that just stretch out the existing screen? Not interesting in looking at Mayock with a five foot wide face.

Being Who You Thought We Were Since 2005!

by WCG on Apr 26, 2008 1:12 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Hmmm

i guess i have the shizznit…it does neither for me.

by SuperBowlXX on Apr 26, 2008 1:14 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

well guys

unfortunately i have to work today, so i won’t be around for the festivities.

go for mendenhall!

by lopey986 on Apr 26, 2008 1:12 PM CDT   0 recs

that sucks dude

you here tomorrow?

Being Who You Thought We Were Since 2005!

by WCG on Apr 26, 2008 1:15 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

What a way to ruin my draft day

making me watch Sam A. Smtih.

Being Who You Thought We Were Since 2005!

by WCG on Apr 26, 2008 1:16 PM CDT   0 recs

I meant Steve A. Smith

Being Who You Thought We Were Since 2005!

by WCG on Apr 26, 2008 1:17 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

I just went to NFLN

because ESPN has Smith.

Screwed on both channels.

Being Who You Thought We Were Since 2005!

by WCG on Apr 26, 2008 1:19 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

I think he playing down to his interviewer.

They are going to play the hell out of that Brett Favor clip.

Being Who You Thought We Were Since 2005!

by WCG on Apr 26, 2008 1:21 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs