NFL Owners Opt Out Of CBA
The NFL owners have voted to opt of the current Collective Bargianing Agreement .
I'm going to let somebody else explain this one .
What happened?
The current CBA, initially negotiated in 1993, was most recently extended in March 2006. The 2006 extension could have continued through the 2012 season, but included an option to shorten the deal by one or two years. NFL clubs voted unanimously today to exercise the option, and to continue negotiating a new agreement for the 2011 season.What does this mean to fans and games on the field?
Regardless of whether a new agreement is reached, NFL football will be played without threat of interruption for at least the next three seasons. The 2008 and 2009 seasons will be played with a salary cap. If there is no new agreement before the 2010 season, the 2010 season will be played without a salary cap under rules that also limit the free agency rights of players. If not extended, the agreement would expire at the end of the 2010 league year.What are the key issues?
The NFL states that clubs are obligated by the CBA to spend substantially more than half their revenues -- about $4.5 billion this year -- on player costs. There are also growing costs for stadium construction, operations and improvements. The NFL feels the current labor agreement does not adequately recognize the costs of generating the revenues of which the players receive the largest share, nor does the agreement recognize that those costs have increased substantially in recent years due to difficult economic times. Owners also have concerns about the inability to recoup bonuses paid to players who subsequently breach their contracts or refuse to perform, as well as the current system that allows some rookies to secure contracts paying them more than top proven veterans.
I'd like to think with 3 years still to play the owners and the player's union can hammer out a new deal.
0 recs |
6
comments
Comments
First let me start off by saying
Man WCG you added a lot of stuff today and its only 11:30 AM CST.
Now yes, with 3 years you think they could hammer something out. Now I don’t know but everyone seemed to think this would lead to a sure lock out in 2011 but sports writers are all think everything is the end all be all. I hope they can work something out but man I think the Players Union is going to bust some balls to try to get as much money as they can. I just hope they work out a better rookie system.
Let us not all forget that in 2006 they delayed the start of FA by about a week to get something done, so I am not sure that 2 years will be enough for two groups who seem to like to wait until the 11th hour.
Lovie Smith-isms:
"We get off the bus running"
"Rex Grossman is our quarterback."
"...and we'll go from there."
by GallopingGhost on May 20, 2008 11:24 AM CDT 0 recs
I'd love to have
at least 5 posts a day, but sometimes news just doesn’t allow that.
Being Who You Thought We Were Since 2005!
by WCG on
May 20, 2008 1:51 PM CDT
up
0 recs
This time of year
is pretty dead as far as football news goes. Most stories lately are just, “[INSERT ROOKIE’S NAME HERE] Looks Good in Practice.”
GG brings up a great point, a huge sticking point for a new CBA could be the restructuring of rookie contracts for first round picks, which has grown completely out of hand.
Official Windy City Gridiron Contributor
by Doctor Chicago on
May 20, 2008 2:26 PM CDT
up
0 recs
If they think they have gotten underhanded
wait until they go through an uncapped year.
Being Who You Thought We Were Since 2005!
by WCG on
May 20, 2008 3:07 PM CDT
up
0 recs
i think the owners messed up
they had a cba in place that did not include guaranteed contracts in the one sport where there should be guaranteed contracts, a guys career can end in one hit. if the player’s union cannot get a deal in place with some type of better guaranteed deals then that union has no power what-so-ever and might as well get used to laying down to whatever the owners want.
by lopey986 on
May 21, 2008 1:18 AM CDT
up
0 recs
I think...
If I remember correctly, Upshaw isn’t interested in seeking guaranteed contracts, and thinks the current system works out better for the players in the long run. I may have him confused with someone else, but it’s definitely one of the big guns on the NFLPA who is against them. So they may not be worried about that.
—d
by itsugly on
May 21, 2008 5:23 AM CDT
up
0 recs









