Corey Graham Improves, Robbie Gould Goes for Distance and More Favre
With Charles Tillman out for personal reasons Corey Graham has seen a lot more quality playing time and has been the most impressive player at camp so far.
Training camp always includes a small group of players considered pleasant surprises. This summer Graham tops that list for the Bears. The fifth-round pick from 2007 has been playing left cornerback with the No. 1 defense, replacing starter Charles Tillman as the Bears allow Tillman time and space to address personal issues.
At 6 feet and 193 pounds, Graham fits the prototype of the ideal Cover-2 cornerback and has improved the way he uses his hands to impede a wide receiver's release. Graham is over the ankle injury that nagged him last year and his speed has been obvious as he stays in step with speedy receivers on deep patterns. His field awareness no longer looks like a weakness. And he has good hands
This camp coaches and kicker Robbie Gould have been working on the one thing that he has never been able to do...consistenly kick for touchbacks.
He had three touchbacks last season after recording 11 in 2006, but the Bears were still tops in the NFL in kickoff coverage at 19.3 yards per return. Gould's hang time always has been good -- at or just above four seconds -- and the Bears hope a change in mechanics will allow him to keep that while driving the ball farther. Special-teams coordinator Dave Toub and assistant Chris Tabor worked with Gould this spring on lining up a little deeper and wider. So far, it has worked well. ''You are always looking to improve,'' said Gould, who cashed in with a $15.5 million contract extension in the offseason. ''You're kicking in Chicago. You're not going to have 27 touchbacks. It's just not going to happen. ''Would you like to see more? Absolutely. But at the same time, when you're kicking the ball over 4.0 [seconds] inside the 5 or deeper, and your guys are covering the ball inside the 20, that's just as good as a touchback. ''We changed up my approach, and we think it's going to help at least have more hang time and/or hit it a little deeper. I'm just trying to get more consistent with it.'' Seems the Packers are getting a bit desperate and may consider trading Brett Favre inside the division. A source close to the situation told the Journal Sentinel on Wednesday that the Packers were considering seeking a deal with one of their division rivals, most probably the Minnesota Vikings or Chicago Bears, if backed into a corner by the National Football League and public sentiment. Of course their management denies that, so take it for what it is. But if the Packers did make that decision I'd have to think they would opt for the Bears first. Do you want to put Favre on a team that has a defense, a top 2 running back and a brand new deep threat?
0 recs |
9 comments
Comments
Favre as a Bear.
I’ve come to terms with the idea. My love of weirdness has outweighed the fact that I’ve felt it necessary to hate the guy for years. I just want to see the Packers fans’ heads explode now.
—d
by itsugly on Jul 31, 2008 8:33 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I'm all for exploding cheeseheads
but not at the expense of putting the antichrist in our backfield.
--Torch
by torch on Jul 31, 2008 9:32 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
bears should get him
just to make sure the vikings don’t, in fact that may work in their favor as I am sure the packers think they could beat the bears either way, but wouldn’t have a chance against the vikings with favre.
by mike b on Jul 31, 2008 9:54 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I'm with torch
I hate the idea of seeing Favre in a Bears uni. But, I do like what you said about keeping him from the Vikings. Maybe we could get him and just let him rot on the bench? I’d be ok with that….
I'M A MAN! I'M 22!
by ChiFan13 on Jul 31, 2008 12:28 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
don't forget....
favre’s on the cover of Madden 08. He’s doomed. Likely to have a major injury a few weeks into the season.
Considering he’s 39 and had one good year out of the last 3. True it was a very good year, and it was the last one, but favre’s best comes from knowing his receivers Id seriously bet he has a poor year with aNybody except Green Bay.
by The Ghost of Rusty Lisch on Jul 31, 2008 4:44 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
don't like him, don't want him
but my personal feelings aside, can we even afford him? Seems to me that keeping the cheap QB’s was part of the plan of resigning everyone else and Favre has a pretty big contract to throw into the mix.
by Ando on Jul 31, 2008 10:58 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Whats with Tillman
He has hardly practiced since camp started I hope everything is OK with him personally.
Bold Prediction: Orton will be the starter in week 1.
by GallopingGhost on Jul 31, 2008 3:57 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Brett Favreraaaa!
I would welcome him with open arms. Even if the Bears didn’t make the playoffs, it would be priceless to see the cheeseheads squirm when we played the Pack.
I’m glad Graham is playing well, but he doesn’t currently have a position to play. Here’s a novel concept, let’s develop an offensive player!?
by propheteer on Jul 31, 2008 7:04 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
In order to develop an offensive player
You need better coaches and scouting on that side of the ball.
I'm not going to even bother trying to update this sig everyday anymore... that's what the standings column on ESPN is for.
Updated on May 25, 2008
by SackMan on Jul 31, 2008 7:10 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 

















