All Favre, All The Time
Why is it the Chicago Bears are in the middle of training camp yet the only thing anyboyd wants to talk to them about is Brett Favre. Let's run through this.
"Nothing surprises me at this point. They're probably just trying to get rid of him," Urlacher said. "They don't want him there, obviously. So I think they'll take whatever's the best offer.
"Too much has to happen for him to come here. I don't see it ever happening. If it does, we have a Hall-of-Fame quarterback playing for us. If not, we have two good quarterbacks as it is."
"No reaction, doesn't affect us," Smith said. "We have our quarterbacks. I'm not going to talk about somebody else's players. … If you want to talk about our quarterbacks, I can talk about them. But that's about it."
Kyle Orton on Favre:
"I haven't paid attention to it one bit because I have enough to worry about," Orton said.
"Every organization makes moves to try and better the team. If [Favre] happens, I guess it happens."
Rex Grossman on Favre:
"It's hard to escape because you hear [Brett] Favre this, Favre that," the Bears quarterback said Thursday afternoon. "I try not to pay attention because I don't really care. ... Ever since I got pulled last year, I've tried to worry about everything I can control and nothing else."
''Not right now,'' Turner said when asked if he could envision the future Hall of Famer in a Bears uniform this season. ''Not with what we have. I like our quarterbacks. That's not to say he's not a great player. He's one of the greatest players of all time. I love watching him.
''Not at this time and in this situation. We've got two good quarterbacks.''
And of course the media telling everybody the Bears are stupid for not wanting Favre:
It's incomprehensible to think the Bears couldn't use Favre. They've needed a guy like Favre since Sid Luckman retired 58 years ago. They'd need Favre if he were 58. How absurd to suggest the only thing wrong with Favre is his timing. Pity he wasn't available five or six years ago instead of Kordell Stewart or Chris Chandler.
0 recs |
3 comments
Comments
well
And of course the media telling everybody the Bears are stupid for not wanting Favre:
if i had any thought we were going to be able to run the ball i would be all over getting favre. i think this team is going to blow either way, but if they did have a running game and you assumed favre would be putting up the numbers he was last year the tema would be stupid not to at least ask.
even still, a team that can’t run the ball real well but has a defense could still use a competent quarterback, especially one that can throw you out of trouble. that running game looks a whole lot better when you are doing it against the nickel or a defense looking pass.
by mike b on Aug 1, 2008 8:53 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Goodell and the Pack in Cahoots?
Are the Pack and Goodell trying to strong-arm Favre into staying retired? It sure looks that way with Goodell putting off Favre’s reinstatement and Green Bay then offering him money to sit out. It sounds like the league and the Packers desire for Favre to remain retired is greater than Favre’s desire to play next year.
by escolio on Aug 1, 2008 3:34 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Not a surprise at all.
Lovie, Turner, Jerry, and the whole crew would never admit to wanting Favre. Deep down inside they want to scream YES i want him!!! If Favre takes this marketing deal I’ll lose all respect for him since everyone is saying he loves to play the game and it’s not about the money. BS.
"I'm not so mean. I wouldn't ever go out to hurt anybody deliberately - unless it was, you know, important, like a league game or something." - Dick Butkus
by propheteer on Aug 1, 2008 10:19 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs

by 

















