Bears Analogy....
This is from a Bill Simmons Article on ESPN.com, here is the link but I pasted the part about the Bears. Nothing none of us don't already know but a funny way of stating it.
http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?page=simmons/080904
Prediction No. 3: Everyone will hail Chicago's yearly attempt to breathe life into a passing game that hasn't shown life since the Willie Gault Era.
"Wait a second," you're saying, "didn't they let Bernard Berrian and Muhsin Muhammad leave? And didn't they just have a Kyle Orton/Rex Grossman battle for the starting QB spot? And didn't they just make a kick returner their No. 1 receiver? How are these good things?"
OK, let's say you just bought a new house, only you got soaked on your mortgage and had to go with a 75-25 instead of an 80-20. You're short on funds, so you decide, "We're going to spend most of our time in the kitchen, TV room and bedroom" and spend all your remaining funds to make those rooms nice: Maybe a 52-inch plasma, comfy sofa, kitchen table, king-sized bed, a few framed pictures, some homey knick-knacks and so on. By the time you're done, every room in the house looks great except for the dining room. Instead of half-assing it and putting a cheap-looking table and chairs in there, or even worse, splurging on a nice table and crappy chairs, you decided to sacrifice that room for 12 months, leave it empty and use that extra money on the rest of the house. It's the right move. And when friends visit and see an empty dining room, you just explain, "Yeah, we haven't gotten around to that room yet." They will understand, especially when they see the rest of your kick-ass house.
Well, that's exactly what the Bears did. Last year's passing game sucked because their quarterbacks sucked. Instead of spending money to patch together another inevitably disappointing passing game, they basically said, "Screw it, we'll leave the dining room empty and spend money everywhere else!" What's the point of spending 10-15 percent of your cap to upgrade your passing game from an "F" to a "D?" If Chicago's defense, running game and special teams can carry them like in 2006, maybe the Bears could play four straight months of ugly, low-scoring games and eke out a 10-6 record or something.
(Would I bet on this? Of course not! Not in a million years! But splurging on the likes of Chad Pennington, Berrian and Donte' Stallworth wouldn't have changed anything other than hurting their cap in 2010. You have to admit.)
0 recs |
6 comments
Comments
“Well, that’s exactly what the Bears did. Last year’s passing game sucked because their quarterbacks sucked.”
the passing game suffered because of lack of production from the oline and no running game. again this a run based offense that couldnt run. they pass of play action waiting for the safties to bite, except last year they didnt bite at all.
by rahulsriram on Sep 4, 2008 9:06 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Mike B, please show me a QB who succeeds with a horrible line.
I know you feel that both these guys suck, but in my opinion both of these guys could have succeeded if they were put in a position where they had an opportunity to succeed. Their was no opportunity to succeed with that line and we all know that.
Kick it to me... I'm open!
by #23 on Sep 9, 2008 11:56 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
please show me a qb
that was bad with a good line.
there are hundreds, and they no longer play.
you can’t sday that the qbs only played badly becasue the line was bad. it is untrue. if you are going to say why the passing game sucked you can’t leave out the bad qb play.
GROSSMAN HAD A CHANcE TO SUCCED IN 06 WITH A GOOD LINE. for the 100th time.
by mike b on Sep 9, 2008 12:58 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
"...the Bears could play four straight months of ugly, low-scoring games and eke out a 10-6 record..."
I remember in ‘05-’06 the Bears had a very visible stretch of going 7 wins in a row after going 1-3 with the Cleveland loss, and they reeled off 8 in a row after beating Green Bay because of the favorable schedule and the teams they played in that stretch weren’t very good that season. So we have to ask ourselves if there’s a stretch in their schedule where they can pull off another 8 wins in a row with some 13-10 victories?
by PaulieK14 on Sep 5, 2008 11:32 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
tough to say....
I know one thing about the schedule this year that can be good and bad is that it is full of streaks (away for 2, home for 2, away for 3, home for 3, etc). Obviously when we are on a home streak it could be great and get some momentum going, but winning streaks on those strings of road games could be tough.
by Ando on Sep 5, 2008 12:00 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs

by 




















