Bears Run Over Colts, Win 29-13
In a game that nobody outside of Bears fans thought Chicago had a realistic chance of winning the Bears went into Lucas Oil St The Big Spaghetti Warehouse and manhandled the Indianapolis Colts.
Can I have some breadsticks?
This was an all around good job by the Bears. Every aspect of the team contributed one way or another. Let's go through the numbers and see what all went right and what might not have.

OFFENSE
Quarterback:
Kyle Orton came out in his first game as the new Bears starter and played the perfect game for what the Bears planned on. He was efficient, smart, he moved well and didn't turn the ball over, but let’s not sell Orton short. While his numbers weren't anything special totaling 150 yards on 13/21 passing, he made a number of big throws. The two most obvious were the ones to Greg Olsen and Desmond Clark to setup scores.
Orton used the time he had well, he got out of the pocket when he needed, threw the ball away when called for and did not force his throws.
B+ - The game will come when Orton is called on to do more, but the game plan for this game only called for certain things from Orton and he achieved them.
Running Back:
Matt Forte made old what's his name, a distant memory real quick like. Forte ran hard, he ran smart and he made some really good moves. Forte had 123 yards on 23 carries for a 5.3 average including the big one for a 50 yard TD. There were a number of other carries where had he not be brought down by a last second shoestring tackle he would have gone for more.
Forte also proved to be a big weapon in the receiving game. His numbers aren't spectacular only gaining 18 yards on 3 catches. This was more about the timing of the catches. He picked up first downs and proved a safe place for Orton to dump the ball.
Kevin Jones had 35 yards on 13 rushes.
A - There was some yardage left on the field, but Forte kept the chains moving, something we haven't seen a lot of recently. Jones had some quality runs, but showed a lack of vision at times. He made some bad decisions in his running.
Wide Receivers:
Seven receivers tallied 150 yards. These guys were not called on to make many plays or go very far. Olsen's longest pass play was for 29 yards, but really given the field position they had that was all that was needed.
B - They had a few drops, but also came through with some key catches. Aside from Olsen and Clark's catches, Lloyd, Booker, Hester and Davis all had catches to keep drives moving.
Game Plan:
The game plan against the Colts is the same for most teams. It is to keep their offense off the field and limit their chances. The Colts did have some chances and they missed some opportunities, but with an effective run game and some timely catches the Bears tallied very few 3 and outs. At one point they were 8/13 on 3rd down conversions. They ate up clock when needed.
A - Against the Colts you cannot expect to shut them down. They have the best QB in the league (Brady's out, so he no longer counts) and too many talented players at skill positions to shut out, but the Bears offense took advantage of their opportunities and grinded down the clock.
DEFENSE
The defense worked the bend; don't break theory almost to perfection. The Colts moved the ball a lot between the 20s, but their offense bogged down in the Red Zone. The Bears kept the Colts receivers in front of them and did not give up many yards after the catch. The longest Colts completion was for 20 yards.
After signs of potential early the Bears stuffed the Colts run game. The Colts tallied 53 total yards. They stopped Colts runners on more than one big 3rd or 4th downs.
Everything the Bears weren't in the pre season they were here. In a 5 questions session with the Colts blog, I said this when asked what the Bears need to do to win:
The Bears need to come hard and often. We have the horses to do it. We have big time speed and power on our defense. I don't know how easy it is to rattle Manning, but I have seen him get a little flustered when he is consistently pressured. I hate to say go man to man in the secondary, because that could be scary with your receivers, but bring the lumber early. Corner blitzes, linebackers, safeties whatever you have bring it, get in his face.
Oh yea and we need to learn to tackle.
I'm not saying I knew something that anybody else didn't, but the Bears sure made me look good here. The Bears were coming hard on almost every play. I haven't seen the Bears defense this creative in some time. Almost every play somebody non defensive line player was on the line showing blitz. Sometimes they came, others they didn’t', but somebody always come. The Bears sacked Manning twice, but they were in his face all night. The Bears controlled both lines all night long. I haven't seen frustrating in Manning's eyes like that since come games with the Patriots years back.
The Bears proved to be opportunistic as ever. Not so much as in turnovers, though Tillman did strip the ball from Harrison and Briggs ran it in for the TD, but the Bears took advantage of what was put before them. When the Colts went for an ill advised 4th down the Bears stuffed them. When the Colts were deep in their own territory the Bears sacked Manning on the 1 and then got the safety the next play. Tackling was also much improved.
B - Despite the good play all around there was some missed tackles and Nathan Vashar got used a number of plays. He was juked by the Colts run game a couple of times and looked lost and slow on a few shots the Colts missed downfield.
Game Plan:
A - Again, bend, don't break. Give Manning all the 5-10 yard plays he wants. It kills the clock; he gets frustrated and gives our guys more opportunities to get after them.
SPECIAL TEAMS
Let's get the biggie out of the way first. Devin Hester is either getting too big of a head or is getting restless not getting kicked to. When he brought the ball out of the end zone after stalling the Colts special teams were still coming hard and still heading toward him. He must not have even checked the whole field, because he didn't even see the guy who tackled him. Gould went 2/2 and Maynard had 5 punts for an average of 35.6.
C- - Gould was solid as usual, and the Bears coverage was very good, but Hester's bone headed play and a few not so great punts from Maynard bring the overall performance down.
OVERALL
When was the last time you felt the Bears knew what they need to do and knew how to do it on both sides of the ball? Outside of a few points where it looked like the Colts were coming around the Bears dominated the game. The Bears only had one obvious miscue or moment of confusion when instead of burning a time out they let the clock run down and ended up with a FG when a TD was a possibility.
We can't get ahead of ourselves. We played very well, but the Colts did shoot themselves in their foot on a number of occasions. They completely misused their timeouts. They challenged plays that they shouldn't have.
But we could not have asked for more. A number of people thought a 0-4 start was a very real possibility. The Bears have gotten off to a great start. There are not many more teams on their schedule who can match the combination of the Colts offense and defense. The Bears need to keep their noses down and continue to improve.
0 recs |
49 comments
Comments
True Dat
The Bears did not play a spectacular game, it was rather sloppy at times, but when execution needed to happen, they did it. Especially Orton and Forte, looking more mature and more developed as offensive leaders than was predicted. Forte was sharp up the middle, and guards Garza and Beekman should be credited for their blocking along with Olin K. I gotta say I really like Forte, Devin Hester, Greg Olson, and Des Clark as go to guys for Orton. the tight end formations from the backfield showed some offensive movement with the running backs I hadn’t seen before in the regular season. It made Forte, Clark, and Olsen very effective. I like the new look and the new leader, Orton. Mainly though, WHAT A RACEHORSE FOR A RUNNING BACK. Forte juked Bob Sanders so smoothly and left him in the dirt. On defense, all I gotta say is good job for looking like what you are paid to look like, a takeaway ball hungry defense with talent at every corner. If the Bears keep this steady and improve along the way, look out. NFC North is very up in the air.
by Chicagoso on
Sep 8, 2008 1:33 AM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I was not sure about the Bears before this game
but if Orton, the running game and the defense plays this way every week then I also believe that the NFC North is up in the air and we have a good chance of grabbing it.
I wish it were winter so we could freeze it into ice blocks and skate on it and melt it in the spring time and drink it!
by brownbuddha on
Sep 8, 2008 2:20 AM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
If the bears stay like that
It could actually be a contest all year along. And here I was looking forward to the Vikes walking away with the North.
by Robert Rence on
Sep 8, 2008 7:17 AM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Orton...
… played well?
visit the mindful mission
by big_lowitzki on
Sep 8, 2008 8:31 AM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
He played his role the way he was asked too.
Yes he played well. Early Orton did look frustrated and wasn’t sharp, but he didn’t get rattled. He still was able to make the throw needed to get us points in the end. He also looked better as the game continued. His role was to hand off the ball and make a few timely throws and have no turnovers. Yes he played that role well. He was not asked to throw for 250+ yards and a pair of TD’s. He did complete in the 60% range which is a good start to the year.
No Orton was not a superstar in the game. He was an effective game manager who made enough throws to get us points.
Kick it to me... I'm open!
by #23 on
Sep 8, 2008 10:02 AM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
the bears...
… won’t win a lot of games with Orton going 13 for 21 for 150 yards.
visit the mindful mission
by big_lowitzki on
Sep 8, 2008 12:04 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
ok...
i love when people make comments like that. who says he’s going to throw 13 for 21 for 150 yards every game? if you want to generalize on one game then i’ll go one step further. if we run for 180 yards, force a turnover for a TD, get a safety, and hold a great offense to 13 points then the Bears WILL win a lot of games.
Orton played solid, did what was needed to be done, and the Bears won. Let’s leave it at that.
by Ando on
Sep 8, 2008 12:32 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
ugh
Here is the thing.
All of those things will not happen every game. And those things will not happen in MOST games.
That is the problem.
This team will need more from Kyle Orton, BECAUSE all of those things will not happen every week.
Thanks for proving my point.
visit the mindful mission
by big_lowitzki on
Sep 8, 2008 12:41 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
well no kidding, i was being sarcastic
that was exactly my point. wait for a game that those things don’t happen, then we’ll see what his stat line looks like and if he got the job done or not. in THIS game however, those things did happen and he had a solid game doing what needed to be done. if you’re just saying to hold off on calling him the second coming then i totally agree, but it seemed to me like you were criticizing him for his less than stellar stats.
by Ando on
Sep 8, 2008 2:34 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
big_low
What would you have them do? Do you see a better option than Orton?
Being Who You Thought We Were Since 2005!
by WCG on
Sep 8, 2008 3:56 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
yea.
I think that Rex Grossman is and was a better option. I have said that for a while.
But is beside the point. The point is that Orton did not have a great, or even a good, game yesterday. He was mediocre. Or average. At best.
visit the mindful mission
by big_lowitzki on
Sep 8, 2008 4:38 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
grossman
I have always been a fan of Rex’s talent and there is little doubt in my mind that he is a better QB than Orton, skillwise. He can make any throw and is much more capable of carrying an offense when needed.
That being said, I am buying into the Orton decision because I don’t think our line is capable of handling the blitzes that teams inevitably throw at Rex to prevent him from using his arm skills and instead forcing him to make decisions, which is not his strong point.
by Ando on
Sep 8, 2008 5:07 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I feel the same way.
I think Rex could be great if he had a team that could protect him. None of us is confident yet that this line will protect.
Orton on the other hand didn’t put up great numbers because he didn’t pass often. The question you have to ask is why not? Well because we were winning. His stats were lower because he didn’t have to throw to keep us in the game. Other games he’ll have to throw more, but he did his job last night. No turnovers, helped convert 3rd downs when needed, helped get into scoring range. That is all they asked of him. Good job Kyle in week 1. Keep up the good work!
Kick it to me... I'm open!
by #23 on
Sep 8, 2008 5:29 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I would take Ortons medicre stats and a win
then good stats and a lose every day of the week
The following are stats for losing QB’s, 30-49 257 yds and 1 TD or 17-27 217 yds and 3 TDs, both of those players teams lost there game.
Orton did what he was asked dont turn the ball over thats it, give us a chance to win.
I wish it were winter so we could freeze it into ice blocks and skate on it and melt it in the spring time and drink it!
by brownbuddha on
Sep 9, 2008 1:51 AM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
of course
I would always rather have a win than a good numbers from a quarterback.
But that is not the point, and you know it.
visit the mindful mission
by big_lowitzki on
Sep 9, 2008 10:32 AM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Well... that line is going to be the norm
I’m guessing Orton won’t average over 200 yards/game.
We know what the plan is here: it’s pretty much 2005 all over again. Win the field position battle, try to control the clock (even on your 3 and outs), and take care of the football. Let the defense and special teams create the big scoring opportunities.
I'm not going to even bother trying to update this sig everyday anymore... that's what the standings column on ESPN is for.
Updated on May 25, 2008
by SackMan on
Sep 8, 2008 1:12 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
We had lots of 3 and outs in 2005.
I think this season can be different because Kyle can actually throw the ball over 5 yards without looking like a drunk QB. It may be 05 all over again, but the good news is Kyle has improved a ton since 2005. It could be a better year, if the defense keeps putting up those type games.
Kick it to me... I'm open!
by #23 on
Sep 8, 2008 5:32 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
dave, you're wrong here
http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/O/OrtoKy00_games.htm
Check out 2005 10 – 6 with numbers like that. And that defense was great, of course, but this is basically the same defense. Only now, we have devin hester.
by tempchad on
Sep 8, 2008 5:10 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Maybe...
this will shut up all the Bears bashers on this site(at least for another week) who go in every post and bitch ab. what the front office hasn’t done this offseason or how they can’t wait till Lovie is on his way out of Chicago. I’ll admit, a veteran fa offensive lineman would have been very nice this offseason but it didn’t happen. No need to cry about it, bash the team u claim to love, or write this season off before it’s began. Everybody has an opinion but it gets old coming to a Chicago Bears website and seein so many people hate, plain and simple. Now, as far as the game went last night, I can say i was surprised, but not surprised at the same time. I was confident the D would show up, regardless of how poorly they played last yr. and this pre-season and man did they show up. W/ Saturday and D. Clark both being out and Peyton Manning playin his first snaps since last year I’m sure many will use that as an excuse to put us down but the way I saw it we controlled the game. The Colts had 45 yds. rushing halfway through the 4th quarter if I remember correctly, which I’m sure nobody thought would happen, myself included, but the way we pressured Manning and shut down the deep ball was beautiful. What surprised me was Matt Forte and the way he left Bob Sanders in the dust.I thought he looked nice in OTA’s and the pre-season, but after running all over that Indy D he looks like he could be a stud. Orton did his job and played very efficiently(the lob to Olsen on the sideline was NICE). w/ St. Clair, Beekman, Kreutz, Garza, and Tait controlling the line of scrimmage, not signing a FA lineman doesn’t look that bad after all huh?
"URLACHER IS GOD"....."PLAY-MAKERS STAND UP!!!!!"
by Acreman20 on
Sep 8, 2008 2:33 AM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Wow, you make critics look so bad with these crying remarks. Good one.
Kick it to me... I'm open!
by #23 on
Sep 8, 2008 10:03 AM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I'll take a FA lineman signing any day, you are dead wrong. I love how you try to say the line is good after they have a good game.
Wow. I’m going to predict Bush to beat Al Gore and the Giants to win 5 straight road games and knock off the unbeaten Patriots in the Super Bowl. I’m so smart aren’t I.
Kick it to me... I'm open!
by #23 on
Sep 8, 2008 10:05 AM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Great game
Solid run defense, fairly impressive play calling and execution, and very strong running from Forte and even Jones at the end of the game. It could have been an even broader final margin if one considers that b/s call against Urlacher at the end of that one Colts drive.
Anyone know why Manning seemed to be arguing with his offensive coordinator on occasion? Seemed like he was upset with the plays or something.
Bear Down! 1-0!
I'm not so mean. I wouldn't ever go out to hurt anybody deliberately - unless it was, you know, important, like a league game or something. - Dick Butkus
by iowaBear on
Sep 8, 2008 6:32 AM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Yeah what about the ST's fumble we should have had in field goal range?!
Kick it to me... I'm open!
by #23 on
Sep 8, 2008 10:06 AM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Forgot about that ...
good catch and so true. That’s one more ‘game changer’ that we got the shaft on.
I'm not so mean. I wouldn't ever go out to hurt anybody deliberately - unless it was, you know, important, like a league game or something. - Dick Butkus
by iowaBear on
Sep 8, 2008 12:47 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
That would have been 3-7 points added in our favor, plus the minus of a possible 3 from the Colts on the roughing the passer call.
Kick it to me... I'm open!
by #23 on
Sep 8, 2008 5:33 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
sure it was gonna be sloppy since it was against the Colts
I look forward to seeing how this team performs against Carolina next week
2008 Cubs: Who needs nine innings, when you only need a 7th?
by Chanman25 on
Sep 8, 2008 6:43 AM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Wow. Just... wow!
I don’t even know what to say… I’m so shocked. We looked like our old selves again!
I have to give credit to the defense and Bob Babich. Babich finally did something that I’ve been ranting about for a while: he set the tempo of the game on the defensive side of the ball. Babich was stacking the box and playing aggressive defensive football, mixing up his coverages, dropping back different LBs, and sending different blitzers.. keeping Peyton Manning on his toes guessing.
The strategy worked as well on the field as it does in theory. They confused Peyton just enough to force errant throws, disrupt timing, and apply enough pressure to create errors.
Then, Babich also made an early adjustment in the first half which was great to see. After Peyton kept taking advantage of our soft coverage at the line, Babich quickly made a change, and had our DBs playing tight at the line… forcing the Colts to adjust.
I'm not going to even bother trying to update this sig everyday anymore... that's what the standings column on ESPN is for.
Updated on May 25, 2008
by SackMan on
Sep 8, 2008 8:04 AM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
looked like an actual
defensive coordinater.
big question they have to ask now assuming two things:
1) manning is the best pick you apart qb in the league
2) that was not the best offensive blocking effort you will see this this year
how much blitzing do they continue to do? a case could be made that many of our next opponents will bick up the blitz better but with worse quarterbacks. hopefully they can find a good balance and not take themselves out of the game.
would have liked to see better play from the secondary on the deep throws, good thing the colts had a case of the dropsies
by mike b on
Sep 8, 2008 9:06 AM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
WELCOME BACK
our defensive problems started with the colts in SB XLI and it ended with the colts in Lucas Oil. It’s been a bizzare journey but we made it home. The cycle has been complete and we can close that chapter. It shall never be spoken of again. Idenity crisis over! We are NFC heavyweights once again my friends. BEAR DOWN!
by WavyGravy on
Sep 8, 2008 8:19 AM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Now... if we could just improve that O-line. Oy.
St. Clair looked horrible. I’d have to say right now he might be the worst starting LT in the league. And, he was soooo slow getting out to the second level to run block. Ughh.
Tait had some lowlights as well.
I'm not going to even bother trying to update this sig everyday anymore... that's what the standings column on ESPN is for.
Updated on May 25, 2008
by SackMan on
Sep 8, 2008 8:30 AM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I thought...
… that the O-line did a good job on the run blocking schemes, but looked pretty awful with their pass blocking.
Forte and Jones both had pretty decent holes to run through, and both were able to hit those holes pretty hard.
visit the mindful mission
by big_lowitzki on
Sep 8, 2008 8:33 AM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
i wouldn't say awful
they kept freeney from having the big game many though he would have.
that oline definately got some help from orton’s poise in the pocket.
by mike b on
Sep 8, 2008 9:01 AM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Well. Our gaurds played well. And Olin was fine as usual.
But, our Tackles had a rough go… it just so happened that it didn’t stand out last night because Orton got rid of the ball pretty quickly, and we played winning football altogether.
But, seriously… Freeney gave St. Clair a workout. We were forced to give St. Clair a lot of help at times. And Tait didn’t look real sharp on obvious pass downs when the DE’s could pin their ears back and rush.
I'm not going to even bother trying to update this sig everyday anymore... that's what the standings column on ESPN is for.
Updated on May 25, 2008
by SackMan on
Sep 8, 2008 9:21 AM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I was happy Freeney didn't cause us more problems then he did,
but I think he’ll be a better DE the longer the season goes. He is coming off of surgery and I’m sure he’s lost some explosion and agility on that knee.
Kick it to me... I'm open!
by #23 on
Sep 8, 2008 10:09 AM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
could be the case
we’ll know how big this game really was in a few weeks, but for now it feels great.
by mike b on
Sep 8, 2008 10:12 AM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
It does feel good.
I really needed the hope that they gave me. I’m pretty optimistic and was starting to get extremely pessimistic. I’m not giving the front office a pass on bad decisions they made, but at least what we have feels better than before.
Kick it to me... I'm open!
by #23 on
Sep 8, 2008 5:35 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
he made a number of big throws
ne needs to watch his throws outside the hashes, he falls in love witht hem and they’re going to start getting picked off. the ball was slow to the outside and it almost happened once already.
of burning a time out they let the clock run down and ended up with a FG when a TD was a possibility.
i was on the phone with the old man, did they really have time outs they didn’t use?
by mike b on
Sep 8, 2008 9:00 AM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Helluva Way to Open the Season!
Great win last night — I was shocked they came out and played with the intensity that they did, but pleasantly suprised. Forte is going to be a stud — we have already improved dramatically in the running game after only one game, Jones did a nice job spelling as well. The defense played great, mixed up soft and agressive coverages, and rattled Manning enough to get him out of synch. And Orton — nothing specatcular but he made the throws when he needed to — it was nice to see them getting Olsen into the mix. The playcalling overall was great in this game — it was nice to see the Bears take some chances down field when they normally would have just run it up the gut (prime example being the 3-and-1 pass to Dez Clark — LOVED that play call to put the game away.
Great win and hopefully they will carry this momentum into Carolina next weekend. BEAR DOWN!!
by NotMyForte on
Sep 8, 2008 9:11 AM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Well, that's me told.
For a game anyway.
I feel like Forte’s going to be broke down by end of Week 8. Quick: Name the last rookie RB to get over 300 carries his rookie year (~19/gm) and not have serious injury issues. LaDainian Tomlinson in 2001? Jamal Lewis in 2000? Hmm…
I say, either continue to run him 20 times per game (because they’ll need him) and expect him to miss a game or two or three but not more… OR…. keep close count of his carries and don’t let him get more than 15 per game.
by tyger1147 on
Sep 8, 2008 9:34 AM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
We definitely have the depth to cut a few carries off his load per game.
Kick it to me... I'm open!
by #23 on
Sep 8, 2008 10:12 AM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
We got hosed on two big calls...
- that fumble we recovered was clearly a fumble after the review. I don’t know how that wasn’t overturned in our favor. #2 The roughing the passer call on Urlacher. Come on. That was BS.
I'm not going to even bother trying to update this sig everyday anymore... that's what the standings column on ESPN is for.
Updated on May 25, 2008
by SackMan on
Sep 8, 2008 10:18 AM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Defense Great, but
safeties still missed tackles and took bad angles. Just constructive criticism, other than that the defense looked terrific and I especially like their aggressive play.
The offense was very efficient and made few mistakes – great start – more Greg Olson please.
"The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the intelligent are full of doubt." - Bertrand Russell
by phastphil on
Sep 8, 2008 10:27 AM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
what i like about Orton is...
he understands his role on the team unlike Rex who was always trying to be a superstar, KO was a good game manager and i am happy for him
by SamuraiMike50 on
Sep 8, 2008 11:06 AM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Orton
Did more than manage the game — no the stats were not incredible — but he made some outstanding throws when he needed to. And throughout the game, he looked comfortable and poised in the pocket. Something we didn’t see from Grossman very often at all.
And again, the playcalling was outstanding. Throwing on 1st down, catching the defense off guard, and going downfield when in the past they would have ran it up the gut. Great game all-around. Not much to complain about this morning…
by NotMyForte on
Sep 8, 2008 11:44 AM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
he made some good throws...
… and he made some really bad throws.
Again, as I said above, the Bears won’t win many games with a starting QB going 13-21 for 150 yards.
visit the mindful mission
by big_lowitzki on
Sep 8, 2008 12:05 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Another good thing from the game last night:
We stayed healthy. I know it’s only one week but it’s a long season and taking it one week at a time is the key and for week one we didn’t get bit by the injury bug, I know we all gasped when Briggs limped off the field in the 1st and then again later when Forte went to the sideline for his shoulder but they came back. Brown is still healthy and so is Dvorcek and Vasher. That’s more than we could say after week 1 last year. I hope it stays this way. I am really hoping for a repeat of the ’05 season. If anyone watched Bears Post Game Live on CSN, Azumah and Jim Miller both said if we continue to play this well we could have a winning record.
Fire Angelo!!
by GallopingGhost on
Sep 8, 2008 2:58 PM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
play like that
and you can do a lot more than have a winning record.
by mike b on
Sep 8, 2008 3:01 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs









