Matt Cassel Update
by ChiFan13 on Jan 4, 2009 4:17 PM CST
17 comments
Sorry, all you Cassel fans (via ESPN):
The New England Patriots have decided to ensure that quarterback Matt Cassel won't be an unrestricted free agent, as scheduled in March.
Sources told ESPN senior NFL analyst Chris Mortensen that the Patriots will use a franchise tag on Cassel that will give the team two options: Trade him if all goes well with Tom Brady's rehabilitation from a knee injury or keep him because all is not well with Brady.
The Patriots' intention to franchise Cassel was first reported by the National Football Post.
Looks like we have to look elsewhere for another QB.
0 recs |
17 comments
Email
Print
Comments
ok first off
we were never going to get him, he isnt worth the money..hes a matt schaub. and even if he was that good on the pats, belive me that the bears would make him look terrible……you can do alot w/ welker and moss
by DaNate23 on Jan 4, 2009 4:37 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Shaub was pretty decent this year when he actually played.
Kick it to me... I'm open!
by #23 on Jan 4, 2009 4:53 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Schaub when healthy is pretty good
(although Andre Johnson & Slaton don’t hurt).. the problem is, he’ not healthy.
by halfblindcubbiegirl on Jan 4, 2009 8:11 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
You can do alot
with a Olsen and Berrian.
What to do, with Larry Hughe?
by Rudey on Jan 5, 2009 8:03 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
i would...
… take Matt Schaub in a second.
Bringing moderation to a place I don't moderate.
visit the mindful mission
by big_lowitzki on Jan 5, 2009 10:42 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
C'mon guys, focus, back to reality
We are the Chicago Bears, we do not go after big time quarter backs. The only way we will ever have a big time quarter back is if we happen to draft our own 6 round nobody out of college that just happens to become a super star. And that’s just the way it is, that’s reality. The only bad thing Papa Bear did for this team, our beloved Chicago Bears, was to leave the team in the hand’s of people who don’t care about us, the fans. Now I believe that Virginia want’s to see the team win because that’s what dad wanted but these McCaskey’s… Please God, help us.
Passion For The Game, Loyal To The Name, Chicago Bears, I Trust In Thee, Standing Strong Since 1983.
by Haightminow on Jan 4, 2009 10:01 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
It will be humourous to listen to Angelo's
press conference about the importance of the QB, then he goes out and brings in Chris Simms or a 39 year old Jeff Garcia. There you go Jerry. Way to stabilize the position.
Being Who You Thought We Were Since 2005!
by Adam T on Jan 5, 2009 12:22 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
not necessarily
Looks like we have to look elsewhere for another QB.
This isn’t necessarily true. I have read thoughts that the Patriots are franchising him so that they can trade him and get something back in return. If Brady is healthy (and, to be fair, that is a question mark at this point), I cannot see them obligating so much cash to one position.
IF Brady is healthy, both QB’s will not be on the Patriot’s roster next year.
Bringing moderation to a place I don't moderate.
visit the mindful mission
by big_lowitzki on Jan 5, 2009 10:41 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Very true
There is the possibility of a trade. Like you said, there is no way in hell that they will keep two QB’s on their roster for $29 mil. We could in theory get Cassel from the Patriots. If we did though, it would most likely be later in the summer since there are so many conflicting stories about Brady’s rehab.
But we would also have to give up a lot for Cassel.
I'M A MAN! I'M 22!
by ChiFan13 on Jan 5, 2009 3:38 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Not worth it
I’m not opposed to taking a shot at Cassel, but if they franchise him he is due a ton of money. I’m not interested in him at that price.
Being Who You Thought We Were Since 2005!
by Adam T on Jan 5, 2009 3:55 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Not until...
…we shore up our other, more glaring problems.
I'M A MAN! I'M 22!
by ChiFan13 on Jan 5, 2009 4:03 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
That's all I've heard.
It’s not certain Brady will be ready by the new season. He’s behind schedule. The theory i"ve heard is that if he’s ready by training camp, they’ll trade Cassell. At that point, what do they really care what they get back? He could have gone for nothing and the only reason they kept him were injury concerns. I don’t think they’d ask for too much.
Viva la nuance! Reading comprehension rules!!!
by tyger1147 on Jan 6, 2009 10:51 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
they can't...
… ask for too much in return with the salary that Cassell will be receiving.
Bringing moderation to a place I don't moderate.
visit the mindful mission
by big_lowitzki on Jan 6, 2009 12:06 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
If someone really wants Cassell
What they can do is negotiate a salary with Cassell before the trade. Wants he accepts then you sign the contract. How his contract needs to be setup is, the 14 million for season one needs to be viewed as part of the guaranteed contract and part of the signing bonus. Then you can make years 2-4 or however many seasons you want him, back at the range he probably deserves. The Franchise season is more than he is worth currently, but could be negotiated as part of his signing bonus, just deferred throughout the season. Does that make sense? He is tradeable and you could get good return on him.
I doubt his agent will truly believe he has proved he derserves 14 million a year. They will want guaranteed money and years and a nice salary, maybe 8-10 million a season. I don’t even think he’s proved that he deserves that, but his agent will think so.
Kick it to me... I'm open!
by #23 on Jan 6, 2009 2:22 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Comments For This Post Are Closed
Secondary Sidebar
User Tools
Community Guidelines
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
Certain photos copyright © 2010 by Associated Press or Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Associated Press and Getty Images is strictly prohibited.
