Uncapped Season
The honorable John over at Mile High Report sent out an email with some details of what would happen if the NFL went into 2010 with no salary cap.
I though some of you may like to read this:
1. Free Agency Requirements Raised From 4 to 6 years -- Currently, players who are unsigned and have finished at least four NFL seasons are free. In the 2010 market, players will be free if they are unsigned after at least their sixth NFL season. In other words, 2009 would have to be a player's sixth season, and he would have to enter 2010 unsigned. Let's use Cleveland wide receiverBraylon Edwards as an example. In his original rookie contract, signed in 2005, the final year is 2009, which would be his fifth NFL season. Ordinarily, he'd be a free-agent in 2010 -- if the team didn't sign him before then or place a franchise tag on him. But under the 2010 rules, he won't be a free-agent.
2. Three 'Franchise'-type Tags Instead Of One -- Right now teams can designate one player each year as a "Franchise" player(average of top-5 salaries at position) or "Transition" player(average of top-10 salaries at position), restricting his ability to negotiate with other teams. Should the League go uncapped in 2010 and 2011 each team would have access to 1-Franchise Tag and 2-Transition Tags. Not only would a player have to wait 6 years just to get to Free Agency, they would have a much greater likelihood of getting restricted even further with one of these tags.
3. Top 8 Teams Will Be Restricted -- If the uncapped year is reached, the teams with the best eight records in football in 2009 will be severely restricted from jumping into the pool. It's still not precisely determined how the system would work, but let's say the Patriots are one of the top eight and want to sign a free-agent to a five-year, $20-million contract. They'd have to lose their own player or players to contracts totaling $20 million before they could sign the free-agent they want. Conceptually, that's how this clause in the deal is going to work, but the exact mechanics of it are not clear yet. The purpose is very clear: The best teams are going to have tight leashes in free agency. And I can tell you from talking to a few traditionally good teams at the league meetings last week, they're not happy about it.
0 recs |
2 comments
Comments
Good Stuff...
But I’d play for 50k a year.
Residence: Portland, Oregon Pro Team: Da Bears NCAA Football: LSU Baby!! Make sense?
by GeauxBears on
Jan 9, 2009 4:03 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
Correct me if I'm wrong but this means that. . .
. . . we should be rooting for a terrible 2009 season (or at best, SuperBowl, not runner up, the actual damn trophy this time) so we aren’t adversely affected by the CBA? It would suck for us to have won the NFC North in ’09, only to have the CBA restrictions stifle our potential growth. . .
by ChiCity85 on
Jan 9, 2009 6:18 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs









