The Bears Blitz
The last couple years the Bears have been near the top in blitzing. Not necessarily in blitzing effectiveness, just near the top in number of times blitzed. They'll bring the linebackers, safeties, and nickleback at most any time. They'll "mug" their LB's up close to the line of scrimmage, they'll line their defensive backs up on the edge, and they'll occasionally run a delay blitz up the middle. They show a lot of different looks in their various blitz packages, but I know an appropriate saying that applies to this;
"Don't confuse activity with accomplishment." The Bears are very active in their blitzing, but is anything really getting done?
In the Bears 4-3 scheme, their 4-3 one gap scheme, each defender is usually assigned a gap. The four down linemen are asked to penetrate and control their gap, and depending on where the defensive linemen line up the linebackers are asked to cover the remaining gaps. When the Bears blitz when it's not an obvious passing situation, they are blitzing to thwart the run. Either because through scouting and game-planning they spotted a tendency depending on offensive formation, or they are simply clogging up their gaps at the snap.
When run blitzing it's important not to tip your hand too early, as you're vulnerable to an audible to a quick pass play. If an offense sniffs a run blitz before the snap, and senses it's blitzing into the attack point of the run, you can bet the quarterback will try and change the play. Many times we'll see a QB check out of a play, then we see the MLB audibling out of his defensive play to counter the QB's move. This is the game within a game that I love, and something the Bears miss with Brian Urlacher not in there. Say what you want about him not being physically the player he was at 26, the Bears miss his intelligence on the field.
The Bears are solid with their run blitzes, it's their blitzing to get after the QB where the Bears struggle.
Lance Briggs, he of the four straight pro bowls, has a career high of 2 sacks in a season. Brian Urlacher has a career high of 8 all the way back in his rookie year. The Bears linebackers are not good pass rushers. The last good pass rushing linebacker the Bears had was Rosevelt Colvin in 2002, when he had 10.5 sacks. I guess I could channel my inner Greg Blache and claim that sacks aren't as important as simply getting pressure on the QB, but in my opinion, if you're gonna be a team that blitzes, that blitzes on passing downs, you need to get sacks.
Danieal Manning has shown to be a quick blitzer off the edge. I'd like to see Al Afalava delay blitz up the gut on occasion, I think he's physical enough to get in there. And while I'm mentioning the delay blitz, I'd like to see the Bears use this strategy more often. By delay blitz, I'm referring to the blitz when the blitzer isn't just standing on the line of scrimmage, instead he'll blitz from his regular defensive position, or he'll loop around to the opposite side. Just something to disguise the blitz angle. Too many times the Bears show blitz and simply come from there.
There is a positive to showing blitz early. When a defense lines up as if to blitz it changes blocking assignments. The offensive line has to slide protection and the backs have to adjust assignments. Sometimes the QB will audible to a max protection just to cover his own tail, thus taking prospective pass receivers out of the play. Many times we'll see the Bears show blitz then back out of it at the snap. When doing this the Bears are hoping to get the offense to audible to a max protection scheme, then rely on their front 4 to get pressure all while the offense has fewer options running pass routes. Obviously getting a good push out of your D-Line is an important part of this any defensive strategy.
With the Bears not getting many sacks from blitzers, one would assume the blitzers are getting picked up, so one would also assume the D-Line is picking up the slack. This ain't happening (the last 2 weeks anyway) and in order for the Bears defense (or any other teams D for that matter) to be productive against the pass they need pressure.
With all the blitzing going on in Chicago the run defense has been solid the last few years (except for the occasional Cedric The Dominator type performance), but the sacks just aren't there. To paraphrase another favorite saying of mine; "Either blitz (effectively) or get off the pot."
* If anyone has any thing specifically they'd like me to touch on in an X's and O's type post, just shoot me an email, and I'll do my best.
22 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
They are one of the worst defenses in the league to me.
When they do blitz they get stood up at the line. It’s almost like they don’t know who to blitz and when to.
The defense has gone from being a fast gang tackling turnover machine into a preventive poor tackling confused and unprepared wet bag.
I've got this thing and it's fucking golden!
The blitz
What happened to it on Sunday? Lovie allowed Palmer all the time in the world to destroy the Bears defense all over the field. Their blitzes up to the Cincy game were quite effective, even in the Falcons game (no sacks, but plenty of hurried inaccurate throws from Ryan). To me, this was a grevious error and showed his over-confidence in his D-line/Hot Rod. Plus, I haven’t really seen D. Manning or AA blitz since the first couple of weeks. Have you?
"Repetition is only good when you've been winning." - Valet
No need for me to post my thoughts.
You just said everything I would’ve…
No, they seemed to abandon the blitz against Cincy
And when the front 4 couldn’t get to Palmer, he ate us alive…
I've got a question for you Wilt.
With our new guru Marinelli guiding our defensive line this year, have we shown any statistical improvement from a year ago or is this just more sunshine the Bears management/coaches are trying to blow up our backsides?
If you can't laugh at yourself you must not be very funny.
Sacks were up, the last 2 weeks were bad though… time will tell
by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Oct 27, 2009 12:32 PM CDT up reply actions
ie when we played decent o-lines
whenever our defense runs into a decent o-line, we seem to get dominated at the line of scrimmage. i don’t think its rod so much as its our d-line just isn’t that good. if harris was right, it’d be one thing, since he would command a double team and still get pressure, allowing brown or wale to occasionally beat the single blocking they face. but harris ’ain’t that dude anymore, and our line just isn’t that good. brown’s a decent pass/run end, but wale’s garbage when he’s not playing against a scrub. and, yeah, we are terrible at blitzing – we rarely get a sack or an errant throw, and it exposes our secondary even more.
by guy incognito on Oct 27, 2009 3:21 PM CDT up reply actions
Nice jorb coach wilt!
It’s good to see the difference in run-blitzing and pass-blitzing.
What I am curious about, is not only how often the Bears use a run-blitz (and they seem to show the run-blitz early), but why they do it so often.
I wonder if that is not having enough confidence in the front four, or if they are just trying to get our LBs closer to be in better position. I do know one thing though… bringing the LBs up so close allows the RB to make one quick cut, and he’s already into our secondary.
If the LBs are gonna play close and run-blitz, they need to be better at shedding blocks or else RBs are going to get 5-7 yards per clip every time.
Be nice. Flag comments that you think are offensive. Use the "reply" button. Drink plenty of water. Compliment others. Rec (wreck) comments and posts you like. Don't call people names. If you don't like someone's comment, attack the comment and not the commentor. Learn the difference in your/you're, then/than, to/too. Exercise. Relax. Stretch often. Find good in the world.
Just because it can be done on Madden NFL does not automatically make it a viable option in real life.
Late-hanging o-line holds
Don’t help our linebacker’s either. In a game of speed at the NFL level, just that little grip at the last second can mean the difference between Briggs releasing well and the running back making it around him. We have to have more effective release technique from our linebackers than what was shown this last weekend.
We need some maulers back on the line with some size. D-lines that downsize for speed and mobility were effective against big, slow O’s. O-lines are moving to sizable, strong and quick players with outstanding technique. Our D-line is matched for speed and technique and is outlplayed on size to be sure. It’s like watching a JV v. Varsity game sometimes. It’s the direction the NFL O-line model is moving to, and we’re behind the curve on this. I’m not talking about putting twin buddhas (as much as I loved Traylor and Washington) back in, but rather twin Abrams tanks, with lotsa grunt and firepower.
You said it perfectly;
If the LBs are gonna play close and run-blitz, they need to be better at shedding blocks or else RBs are going to get 5-7 yards per clip every time.
getting your arms extended and having the strength to shed blocks otherwise your LB’s are tackling from behind as the backs run by
by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Oct 27, 2009 12:35 PM CDT up reply actions
Our DB's refuse (or can't) jam WR's on the line of scrimmage
So even if the Bears were blitzing more effectively, a competent QB will usually find the open receiver. For some reason, our DB’s cannot (or will not) jam opposing wide – outs, then our safeties usually play about 7 yards off the line of scrimmage. The Bears actually had their safeties playing this way, even when they were in the end zone of a close – yardage play for the Bengals. WTF?
"Mug" look sucks
We use/show the “mug” look way way too much. It may be OK at stopping the run, but it kills us on passing plays.
Why we continue to run our LBs straight into 330 lb O-linemen is beyond me! Worst yet, we show the other team that we’re gonna do it well before the snap.
Bring some friggin pressure from the sides already! It’s been effective when we’ve done if over the last couple years, we just haven’t been doing it very often.
Also, we don’t need 2 safeties deep if we’re gonna play our CBs 8 yards off the line of scrimmage! Pick one: press coverage OR 2 deep safeties!
If we line-up our CBs that far off the WRs, then we can afford to bring the SS on a safety blitz.
by MakeHalasProud on Oct 27, 2009 11:40 AM CDT reply actions
typo
correction: “Pick one: soft CB coverage OR 2 deep safeties!”
-———————————
2 deep safeties makes sense if you’re gonna have the CBs press the WRs at the line. In fact it makes a lot of sense. If you line your CBs 8 yards off the line of scrimmage every play, then it doesn’t even matter if you’re getting pressure on the QB — he’ll always have 2 WRs open to unload to.
The “soft coverage everywhere in the secondary” approach that we use is like a watered-down version of the prevent defense (& we all know how effective “prevent” defense is). Except we use it all game!
by MakeHalasProud on Oct 27, 2009 12:11 PM CDT up reply actions
the bears
have been terrible on their blitzes as long as i can remember, its like the linebackers are told “hey just run really fast into that fat guy with the other team’s jersey.”
D line
It all starts with the D line, and if the line isn’t getting sack/pressure on the QB, ain’t nothing gonna work right in any defense.
"Chance favors the prepared mind." - Pasteur
Well done
Nice breakdown wilt…..almost as good a breakdown as the subjects of your discussion!
by Sweetness Never Dies on Oct 27, 2009 2:28 PM CDT reply actions
It's The O Line Not The Blitz
Everyone knew we had issues with our O line coming in to the season we had the same conversation last year, we didnt fix it, cutler is allways getting crashed he’s takin 5,6,7 step drops just to get some distance and gets hit and knocked down constantlly, yea we blitz alot be cause our corners suck, but if we had a better O line youd see Forte run better that would free up the play action and cutler would stop hearing them damn foot steps. QB’s that are acurate will continue to eat our corners for lunch we dont jam and we allways let them catch first so we can hope to make a tackel insted of challenge the reciever, we just are not that good
Bears blitzing
The Bears are the worst blitzing team in the entire league! Over the last 2 seasons no team has blitzed with more frequency and less success than the Bears. The “mug up” concept is worthless. It fools no one. with absolutely zero pass rush that they have come to possess since the middle of the Super Bowl season even the cover two they play is useless. Everything they want to do is keyed by pressure from the front four. How many top tier teams sack leaders throw out numbers like six sacks for a season? The whole front four is either overrated (Ogunlye) injured or uninterested (Harris) or overpaid (Brown, Harris and Ogunlye). Tommie Harris is the key to all the defense playing better, but he just does not have it anymore. Without being able to push the pocket, all the defensive concepts the Bears like to run ( cover two, mug up, the horrible blitzing) are failing miserably. Lovie is going to have to retool the defense and the defensive philosophies. Every great defensive idea eventually gets exposed. The Bears no longer have the personal to run any of these wonderful defense plans anymore. That ship sailed three seasons ago. It is a shame that we finally have a talented QB and we can,t block for him and we can,t play defense either.
Since the Super Bowl...
We really haven’t gotten any impact players in the draft, via trade or free agency, with the exception of Cutler. Vast potential aside – Olsen is playing about average as of now, and Chris Williams is basically a year behind. I guess Williams is doing okay, but the jury’s still out on him. In the mean-time, both lines have gotten older and we simply haven’t brought in anyone better to replace marginal talent.

by 





















