Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Explaining Jeremy Lin's Early, Surprising Success

The Season in Quarters: Green Bay Packers

Packers-bikini-girls_medium

Since the NFL realigned the divisions prior to the 2002 season, no team in the NFC North has needed more than 10 wins to take the division title.  Of course, there have been years when the division winner ended up with more than 10 wins (2007, '06, '05, '02), but in each of those years, the North could have been won with just 10.

Something tells me though that 2009 will be a different story.  During this past offseason, most people thought that the North would be a battle between the Bears and the Vikings, with few folks considering the Packers into the equation.  After all, last season they only tallied 6 wins, and this season they are undergoing a defensive overhaul, bringing in Dom Capers and his 3-4 scheme.

Star-divide

But, the Packers are showing that they are at least going to ruffle some feathers in the North, having a dangerous offense (if they can protect Aaron Rodgers), and a defense that is doing quite well, despite being in its first year.  With that being said, and with the potential number of wins from the Vikings and Bears, the North is likely to see 3 teams with 9+ wins.  I figure a 12 win season is what it will take for the division winner.

Yesterday, we looked at the Bears season broken into quarters, and how we are on pace after the first quarter to get to that 12 win mark.  Now, let's take a look at the Packers, and see what type of football lies in front of them over the next three quarters of the schedule.

Q1

vs. Chicago

vs. Cincinnati

@ St. Louis

@ Minnesota

Notes: Green Bay finished this quarter at 2-2.  They are scoring plenty of points offensively, but gave up 30+ points in each of their losses.

Q2

vs. Detroit

@ Cleveland

vs. Minnesota

@ Tampa Bay

Notes:  They will get a Bye week before hosting the Lions in week 6.  Having played the Vikings tough in the first meeting, it is a possibility that they pack ends this quarter of play at 4-0.

Q3

vs. Dallas

vs. San Francisco

@ Detroit

vs. Baltimore

Notes:  Three home games in this stretch, GB could end up posting a 3-1 record in this quarter.

Q4

@ Chicago

@ Pittsburgh

vs. Seattle

@ Arizona

Notes:  The Packers will have three tough away games, and their ability to protect Rodgers will likely determine their success through this stretch.  Their defense should be completely jelled at this point, and a 2-2 record would be considered positive through the final quarter of the schedule.

Of course, I am not predicting this from too much certainty, but it is not altogether unlikely either.  If the Packers are able to post these quarterly records, they will end up at 11-5.  Maybe not enough to win the North, but certainly enough to contend.

Tomorrow, Minnesota Vikings season in quarters.  Yesterday, the Bears season.

Comment 14 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I think the Vikes can be taken

…by either club. If memory serves, Favre went on just this type of tear in the 1st quarter last season, only to start heaving it into triple – coverage soon thereafter. Granted he’s with a better team with a great RB, but they didn’t show anything last night that says they’re world beaters.

by Waylon on Oct 6, 2009 10:15 AM CDT reply actions  

Greenbay's defense looked pathetic yesterday...

They made the vikings look like they had already won the superbowl. They put absolutely no pressure on Favre whatsoever. It was disgusting having to hear how great Favre was last night.

by aznsensation on Oct 6, 2009 10:56 AM CDT reply actions  

i agree

i hate nothing more than an espn/favre love fest.

well, maybe an espn/brady love fest

"This one means 'Kill Kirk!!!!'... And also, 'hallelujah'... Depending on the context."

by trippingandy on Oct 6, 2009 7:54 PM CDT up reply actions  

Q2 - Q3

I see 2 or 3 losses in that middle stretch (vs. post prediction of 1). Minnesota, Dallas San Fran, and Baltimore = at least 2 losses.

by MakeHalasProud on Oct 6, 2009 10:57 AM CDT reply actions  

I agree

I kinda see the Packs ending up 9-7 this year with their horrible offensive line and injured secondary. Their new defensive scheme hasn’t looked too stellar this year and in all honesty, the Bears beat themselves in game 1. We should be 4-0

by Stellarpete22 on Oct 6, 2009 11:25 AM CDT up reply actions  

Don't forget!!!

Our division is very strong this year and honestly the Bears just need to focus week to week on their own game. Don’t forget there are two teams that make the wild card so we can’t get let down after any losses because we are strong enough for at least 10 wins!

by Stellarpete22 on Oct 6, 2009 11:23 AM CDT reply actions  

Q2.

I think Q2 is their only winning quarter. I don’t think they’re a particularly good team. I could see them losing 6 games between Q3 and Q4.

—d

by itsugly on Oct 6, 2009 11:24 AM CDT reply actions  

Their schedule is set up nice for a decent run.

Besides the possibility of Minny (which they get at home), I don’t see them losing in Q2. Aaron Rodgers is an extremely good QB – how did the Packers strike gold twice in a row at the same position? Not to mention some of their backups while Favre was there!

-------
"Newbie, if the next two words out of your mouth aren't 'See ya' then the third word will be 'Oh my god. My crotch. You've punched me in my crotch." - Dr. Percival Ulysses Cox

by David Taylor on Oct 6, 2009 11:48 AM CDT reply actions  

We cannot underestimate the play of Rodgers

the guy through for nearly 400 yrds last night and was constantly hounded. He is a very good QB. That will always be a concern. But I think the vikes got burned on some big plays when they blitzed, if team sit back in the zone and can get pressure on that poor Oline it could cause him problems. I dare say that the GB safeties are no better than ours. They were brutal. They can still win 10 games though..

Roachy love the run stuffin', but don't forget about the TE over the middle!!

by tfrabotta on Oct 6, 2009 12:02 PM CDT reply actions  

The gb oline is terrible but...

Rogers is somewhat to blame for the massive sack numbers. He is terrible at feeling the rush and getting rid of the ball. His big weakness is being one of the easiest qbs to sack and no one seems to talk about it. Pressure the packers and you will win.

by BoxingHideout on Oct 6, 2009 2:23 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

good series

it’s nice to see the season broke out like this

by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Oct 6, 2009 12:34 PM CDT reply actions  

seriously

some Chicago ladies need to step up, since don’t have cheerleaders, we don’t have to rely on Packer girls for this stuff.

Being Who You Thought We Were Since 2005!

by Adam T on Oct 6, 2009 6:07 PM CDT reply actions  

Get a girl with class,

then you won’t have to ‘rely’ on Packer girls for “this stuff” – it won’t matter. ;) Lol

"A lot of fans were drawn to me because they knew that whatever the score was, I was going to run as hard as I could on every play. You don't have that now, you have guys waiting for next week or even next year." - Walter Payton

by Ashley Czuba on Oct 6, 2009 6:35 PM CDT up reply actions  

I was wondering where they imported those girls from...

they can’t be native Cheeseheads. Their combined weight has to be about the same as one regular female Packer fan.

Stephanie from Wisconsin being the obvious exeption to that rule.

by BearFan611 on Oct 7, 2009 3:07 PM CDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Windy City Gridiron is the best independent site on the internet for breaking news, in-depth analysis, and hardcore discussion about the Chicago Bears

Community Guidelines

Managers

Windycity_small Adam T

189886_210123485665309_100000029768895_888721_5830650_n__1__small Dane Noble

Editors

Sackwatchcutler_small Lester A. Wiltfong Jr.

Orange_shy_guy_small Steven Schweickert

Capture_small Kev H

Contributing Writers

Lincoln_small Sam Householder

Leprechaun_small Spongie

Polishsausage_small Steve Ronkowski

Cat_bonnet_small Pete Dixon

Icothgmts_small T.J. Shouse