Windy City Gridiron: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: College Football Rankings - BlogPoll Top 25

Bears Effective With The Screen

Wcg_thumb_xo_medium

The screen pass is an essential weapon in any team's playbook.  It can be used as an extension of the run game or in place of an ineffective run game (in the Bears case).  This year, even with all the offensive problems the Bears seem to have, I've been impressed with their screens.

The Bears will hit defenses with a variety of screen passes.  The traditional running back screen down the line of scrimmage, the bubble screen, the slip screen, and the occasional middle screen have all been run with varying degrees of success.  I'm sure most of you already understand the concept of the screen, but I'll look at these screens passes a bit more in depth.

Star-divide

When a team struggles with the run game, like our Bears, defenses spend a lot of time defending the pass.  In this situation the ineffectiveness of the offensive line actually works to their benefit when running screens.  Defenders get so amped up looking to sack Cutler they sell out to get him. 

 

In the most common screen pass (to a back sneaking out of the backfield and down the line of scrimmage), the play side tackle and guard (and sometimes center) will block for a brief moment (a second or two) then pull to set up blocking for the play.  You want to lure the defense up-field with the thoughts of an easy sack.  With the Bears pass protection performing as it is all Cutler typically gets is a second or two, so the deceptiveness of the screen play, in theory, is perfect.  Most teams run this type of screen to their left side, this is for a few reasons. 

1)  Most defenses have their best pass rushing defensive end to the offenses left (to attack the passers blind side), so he's usually quicker up-field.  Many teams will also blitz from the blind side too.  So as an offense you want the aggressive rush, the more defenders rushing up-field the better.

2)  Most offenses have their more agile tackle on the left side.  So if given a choice on which tackle to pull you want your better athlete out in space blocking. 

3)  Even in the NFL some QB's tend to get away from proper technique when being rushed.  When throwing to the left side a right handed QB is forced to turn the hips, open the shoulders, step and throw.  It's nearly impossible to use poor fundamentals when throwing left (for a righty).  But when throwing right it's easy to just chuck it to evade the rush.  And QB's are always more accurate when they are fundamentally sound.

I'm not saying teams don't run this screen to the right, it's just all about your personnel and field position.  The Bears had a lot of success last week hitting Matt Forte on the screen.  He's a good receiver and the more you can get him the ball the better.  Now if only he had the same burst as last year...  but that is for another blog...

 

*  The bubble screen is usually run to a slot wide receiver, with the player in the slot moving away from the QB.  The hope is you can get the ball to a playmaker in space.  The key block is from the WR or WR's split furthest out.  In a 2 WR set the slot receiver will take the pass while the split end tries to seal the CB inside allowing the slot guy to get around him down the sideline.  I'd like to see the Bears run this play with their TE's split wide.  They trot out that formation quite a bit and teams usually keep a DB on Greg Olsen.  Put Devin Hester in the slot with Olsen split wide and throw the bubble to Hester with Olsen providing the stalk block on the corner. 

The Bears finally ran a fake off this play last game.  Cutler faked the bubble then tried to hit a slanting Johnny Knox.  I liked the variation on the play, but I'd prefer to see the split end run a fade or a go route instead of the slant.  If you catch the defense cheating the bubble or biting on the fake to the bubble they could still get close enough to disrupt the slant, but if you pump fake the slant then look for the split end down the sideline he should be in a one on one situation.

 

On a slip screen teams are looking to create a seam on one side of the field for the split end to run through.  Again you are looking for the WR to get in space to make a play, but the QB is throwing to the furthest split out WR as he comes back to the ball then up the seam.  The play side offensive line (and sometimes center) will pull and look to seal all the flowing defenders inside, while the slot receiver (or two slot receivers in a trips formation) will look to block out towards the sideline creating a seam for the player to run through.  

Hester, Knox, and Earl Bennett are all pretty good at both of these WR screens.  The thing we as fans need to remember is these short throws are an extension of the run game.  We're accustomed to looking for big plays when ever a QB completes a pass, but a 4 or 5 yard gain is perfectly acceptable.  Getting a big gainer from time to time would be nice, but getting those little chunks of positive yardage keeps you in third and manageable situations, and ultimately it's about keeping the chains moving.

 

*  Finally on a middle screen you are looking for your intended receiver to catch the ball behind the offensive line.  The idea is to allow all the defensive linemen to rush up-field then dump the ball over their heads to the awaiting receiver.  Usually this play is to a running back, but I'd love to see the Bears utilize this play to the tight end.  Slipping the back into the flat on the tight end middle screen will cause the linebackers that read screen to flow to the back, thus allowing the TE to slip to the middle for the ball.  Greg Olsen is athletic enough to make a play on the ball and get some good yards after catch.  Chicago has run this screen to Forte and they've tried to get Garrett Wolfe involved at times.  The small stature of Wolfe is ideal for the middle screen as he can get lost among the o-line.

 

The main objective of screen passes (besides gaining yardage) is to slow down the pass rush, but if you run them too often defenders will read the play and slip over to throw off the timing or worse yet jump the route and intercept the pass.  This is why teams don't run screen after screen.  Teams want to catch a defense playing aggressively and hit them with a screen pass.  Then the next time they get a free lane that defender might slow up just a split second allowing the QB to go to his next progression and make a big play.  With the way the Bears are pass blocking any edge they can get the better.

2 recs  |  Comment 15 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

I've been really impressed...

…with their screen running ability lately.

Another slight variation I’ve been hoping to see is setting up the WR screen on the left side, and the short pass to the back on the right. I saw a team (college, but I don’t remember who), use it sparingly, but with great success.

They set the screen play up a couple times in the first half, and the defense overcompensated for it in the second half. This gave them a blocking wide receiver on the right, and a halfback who had some room to work as the linebacker had to double back.

Of course, they also got sacked once or twice, because that back had to leave his blocking scheme. But it kept the defense relatively honest when they showed potential screen.

by KDoggers on Nov 17, 2009 10:39 AM CST reply actions  

That would be nice

Those WR screens are all over college, the NFL is just scratching the surface on those…

I’ve also seen a double screen set up with blockers to both sides

by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Nov 17, 2009 10:42 AM CST up reply actions  

I think I've seen something similar

I’m not 100% on what the formation looks like in my head, but with that, I’d be scared that an average to good rushing team is going to destroy you long before you can get the ball off.

by KDoggers on Nov 17, 2009 10:59 AM CST up reply actions  

as wilt mentioned

Screens are cool, but they can allow for more opportunity by the defense to pick off the pass and return it for a long gain or a TD, as wilt said that is why they should not be employed too often. The key is for the OC to have the sense to know when to use them most effectively.

"Chance favors the prepared mind." - Pasteur

by Maelvampyre on Nov 17, 2009 12:00 PM CST reply actions  

Generally agreed.

They’re great as a supplement to the run game, and a good way to get defenses to “bite” later in games. The WR screens in particular should help with the decoy plays to help open up potential opportunities.

That being said, it’s one of the few plays the Bears run successfully often.

by KDoggers on Nov 17, 2009 12:15 PM CST up reply actions  

Very nice, Wilt

a wondrous and technically-savvy break-down as always.

A couple weeks ago I had the fatalistic epiphany that our run game was unsalvageable, and started calling for more screens, and for more Forte in the passing game in general.
For all the crap and mistakes of the offense last Thursday, I thought their downfield blocking on those plays was very well done.
 
So because of that, and for all the reasons you mentioned, I’ve been beating the screen drum for a while now (along with my Cutler-nneds-to-roll-out-more mantra).

I’m not worried about it’s overuse (YET…until a LB gets a pick six on us…).

If it’s working, moving the chains, stick with it. Stick with it until it STOPS working.

I think the screen will continue to be effective for us, especially against aggressive pass-rush proficient defenses like Philly, Minny, Baltimore.

I also continue to want to see the middle of the field attacked w/ the TEs. My impression is we’ve had very good success with that whenever we’ve gone to it this season.

The downside is you don’t get the other benefits of a legit power run game—the demoralizing, punishing, clock-chewing factor, and obviously you’re hindered in short yardage scenarios (like the red zone) where the field is shrunk and there are more defenders in less space.
Ideally, I’d still always rather be able to run (rather than being the Eagles of the past few years), but short/screen game is the next best thing, as you said.

by Amishbear on Nov 17, 2009 12:18 PM CST reply actions  

Definitely.

I’ve also been impressed by the downfield blocking and the blocks that the lineman pulling over to set up the screen have established.

Unfortunately, they continue to get blown up right off the line. I won’t be surprised if one of the hits that Jay has to take just to get a pass off puts Hanie in for a while.

by KDoggers on Nov 17, 2009 12:32 PM CST up reply actions  

I'm looking for more roll outs too

but, the Turner offense doesn’t have that in it

by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Nov 17, 2009 2:24 PM CST up reply actions  

what aout a roll out screen

risky but if you get the linemen chasing an easy pass may be available, and you don’t have to take the screen, you can go for some of the other routes

by DaHamsta on Nov 17, 2009 3:28 PM CST up reply actions  

about

i’m going to download firefox now

by DaHamsta on Nov 17, 2009 3:29 PM CST up reply actions  

I've seen that before

roll one way with a backside screen set up away from the flow…

it’s usually set up where a middle screen would be (behind the O-line), the key is a QB with a rocket arm, like Jay Sizzle

by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Nov 17, 2009 3:59 PM CST up reply actions  

Is it just me...

How is this not a post from week 3ish. To me common sense says a weak oline = good screens because defense is over pursuing and running over us.

The post should read – GOOD JOB COACHING STAFF, WAY TO PICK UP ON SCREENS 9 WEEKS INTO THE SEASON!!!

Lovie, see ya and take your boyfriends babichand turner with you. Here’s to next season

by stumpo on Nov 17, 2009 2:14 PM CST reply actions  

As stated above

Screens are to be used sparingly as any D-Lineman or Linebacker with any “common sense” starts to pick them up after the first few.If the Bears were more efficient moving the ball then yes, more screens should be called.

You're being very Un-Dude right now.

by IslandBoodler87 on Nov 17, 2009 3:08 PM CST up reply actions  

Screens may work...

but this offense just doesn’t seem to be capable of executing plays of that complexity. They can’t do the easy things well, so moving to the more complex seems to be a recipe for disaster. I agree that the variety of screens you describe so well above are the best substitute for a run game this Bears offense may have, but I believe Turner is more worried that offense’s execution may lead to his execution!
I have stated many times that Forte is best compared to Westbrook. This offense in general needs to run more four wide and spread formations. The 2 TE sets and max protect don’t work anyway, so why not send as many people as possible into the pass patterns? Why not use all of the speed and evasive cuts of Hester/Forte/Knox/Olsen/etc. and move the defense away from Cutler? Wouldn’t it be nice to see a 4-wide draw to Forte where hes slips the tackle of a FS on a blitz and runs for 15-20 yards on 3rd down. Or an outlet pass to Forte when he chips on a DE and gets out in space against a LB running laterally? Max protect is only good if it picks up the pressure, otherwise it makes it too easy to defend by putting most of the offense within 10 feet of the ball.

When you find yourself in a hole, STOP DIGGING!!!

by LostInSTL on Nov 17, 2009 9:46 PM CST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Windy City Gridiron is the best independent site on the internet for breaking news, in-depth analysis, and hardcore discussion about the Chicago Bears

Community Guidelines
Start posting about the Bears »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

Arrowhead Pride
The Return Of NFL Football: Vikings vs. Saints
Mile High Report
Thursday Night Open Thread - Vikings vs Saints
Battle Red Blog
Opening Night Open Thread

SPONSORS

SBNation.com Recent Stories

Photo +4 updates

Saints Are Storming: Brees Hits 29-Yard TD On Opening Drive; Saints Lead Vikings 7-0

EAST RUTHERFORD NJ - AUGUST 27:  Antonio Cromartie #31 of the New York Jets is introduced before the game against the Washington Redskins  during their preseason game on August 27 2010 at the New Meadowlands Stadium  in East Rutherford New Jersey.  (Photo by Al Bello/Getty Images)

NFL Season Preview: Football, Why Do We Love You So?

Dallas Cowboys wide receiver Miles Austin (19) reacts after scoring on a 59-yard touchdown reception in the first half of an NFL football game against the Atlanta Falcons, Sunday, Oct. 25, 2009, in Arlington, Texas. Austin had two touchdowns in the 37-21 Cowboys win. (AP Photo/LM Otero)

Cowboys WR Miles Austin Agrees To Six-Year, $57 Million Extension

More from SBNation.com >


Managers

Windycity_small Adam T

Photo_small Dane Noble

Editors

19554_711053815498_20723723_41499369_7695586_n_small HoneyBear

22636_276583252155_506182155_3148787_7229724_s_small Kev H

Contributing Writers

Extrusion_profile_new_medium_small Mike Mueller

Tn48-1_small Just Dave

Bears_small Jacob Hayes

Attachment30_small Lester A. Wiltfong Jr.

3961055499_e489f15bb2_o_small David Taylor

Cna-building_small NiqueBears

Chicago-bears-logo_small Mark Saade