Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Miikka Kiprusoff Wins 300th Game, Buffalo Crushes Boston

Looking for the Bright Side: Week 12 Chicago Bears

Every week, win or lose, there are some things to improve upon for the next game. The opposite of this is equally true, and no matter how soul crushing a loss is there are always a few good things to take from the game as signs of some kind of improvement or life.

So follow me below the jump and lets look at the few pinpoints of light in the loss to the Minnesota Vikings.

Star-divide

Johnny Knox is looking more like a top flight WR every game.

This goes beyond Fort Knox scoring our only touchdown of the game, which was a combination of being a good WR and a picture perfect pass. This is looking specifically at the play in the end zone where Cutler threw a bad ball that instead of going in front of Knox, it went straight behind him right into the man in coverage. How does this make Knox a good receiver you may ask? He didn't come up with the ball, but what he did when he realized he didn't have a play on the ball is something we have been missing for a long time. He immediately went into "CB" mode and attempted to punch the ball loose to save the INT. That's a veteran move from a rookie player, and this isn't the first time Knox has played beyond his years.

If you remember back a few games where Knox drew the unsportsmanlike conduct call by not letting them walk all over him, but then stopping when punches started to get thrown. Great call. Knox consistently impresses me when he's on the field, both as wide receiver and in the return game, and if he's this good as a true rookie we may have the steal of the 2009 draft playing as WR for a long time.

We have an embarrasment of riches in the return game.

Speaking of Fort Knox in the return game, sure he fumbled one against the Vikings but it wasn't your normal guy attacking the ball and knocking it loose fumble. It was one of those spinneroonis on top of the back of an opposing player fumbles that happens once in a blue moon. If you run that play one hundred more times it's likely that Knox is downed and no fumble occurs. He also showed great heart and ability to dust himself off by giving us a fantastic return later in the game that was very close to being a touchdown.

Knox leverages his speed in a different way than Hester tends to, going more straight up field than side to side looking for the home run. Both methods have their place, but when Hester starts dancing too much it spells problems at times. Also back returning we've got Daniel Manning who returns very much in the mold of Joshua Cribbs, less of a finesse runner and more of a bruising return man, he'll make a few shifts but he's heading up field no matter what is in his way. He may not hit the home run ball, but he's going to grab every single yard that he can take from the opposing team on his returns.

If you said two years ago that we'd have two good returners, and neither would be named Hester most people would have called you crazy. Add both of them, and a Hester that could emerge again at any moment and you've got a return game that has to respected even if the rest of the team doesn't earn it.

Al Afalava has a great shot at developing into a quality safety for us.

I'm a guy that likes to admit when he was wrong, and I was wrong about Afalava. I really was against the pick of Afalava due to his off the field issues, since at least the descriptions of the incident showed a real lack of maturity and responsibility. However he's been nothing but a model citizen since coming to the NFL and has had zero negative reports about any of his activities on the field, or off. Boy am I glad I was wrong.

Afalava has really burst onto the scene as one of the only Safeties that I don't cringe when I see him on the field. After watching as much of the game as I could looking for him you could see him dutifully covering his man in the flat at times, and laying absolutely vicious hits at others.

One specific instance of Afalava stepping up would be the pass at the front of the end zone. If you watch the play, HH is the closest man to the play, but doesn't even move more than a couple of inches towards the ball even when he sees it coming in his direction. Meanwhile, Afalava coming back towards the ball makes a really hard hit on the receiver in the end zone. What does this matter? It was still a TD? Yeah, the coverage failed, but at that point the only shot you have is to knock that ball loose and break up the reception which is a duty that Hillenmeyer apparently wanted no part of.

As long as Afalava continues to get better in his understanding of coverages and work a bit more on his mobility, and you could be looking at another hard hitting safety in the mold of Mike Brown in the years to come.

Lance Briggs is getting an opportunity to show himself as a monster with Urlacher's absence.

If you look at the way Lance was talked about during the years of his contract dispute there were definitely two factions. There were the people that wanted to trade him for whatever we could get, and there were people that wanted him to stay. Everyone knew he was a good player, but there was a real undercurrent of thought that Briggs only looked good because teams had Brian Urlacher to deal with. We can put that argument to rest right now.

Sadly Briggs was apparently hurt in this game which is blow I'd rather not have dealt to the team, or to Lance, but while he was on the field he was showing, like he has shown every week, that he is a star in his own right. If you look at the little swing pass to the outside right before Favre got nailed to Chester Taylor you see Briggs literally throw Taylor to the ground with what amounted to one hand. A bit earlier when Hillenmeyer got his first FF, it was HH that caused the fumble, but it was Briggs who launched into the backfield to slow AP down enough to let HH make solid contact and get that fumble.

Lance Briggs has been one of the few bright spots on the defensive side of the ball all year, and he has shown himself in Urlacher's absence as being perfectly capable of being the anchor for our linebackers even once Brian is done with the game.

Rob Gould is rock solid, and may in fact be the real concrete cyanide.

Robbie Gould is a monster with a genetically enhanced kicking leg, woven with dark magick and the tendons of a gorilla. Seriously, Rob Gould is one of the few players on the Bears team that doesn't induce heart attacks when he's on the field. He's one of those few kickers in the league that has earned a trust from the fans and his team, and speaking for myself at least, in Gould we trust. If it's anything less than a 50 yard kick I assume that it's three points on the board and that's that. If you tell me that the Bears missed out on a field goal, I immediately assume there was some kind of blocked kick, and that's how good Gould really is.

Brad Maynard is still looking great, even at age 35.

It's hard to really fathom that Maynard has been in the league for almost fifteen years, but then again the way this guy punts someone may have doctored his birth certificate. He's right there with Gould in the lack of stress factor of this team, whatever you ask of Maynard he does. If you want a high pop fly, it happens. You want them pinned deep with a corner kick, it happens. This year with his new strength program he's even regained some of that pop that had started to diminish the last few years. When you go three and out as much as we have been lately, it really pays off to have a monster like Maynard back punting.

Comment 30 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Another reason why Maynard is so great?

He’s a Ball State grad! Chirp! Chirp! Haha.

Nice write-up and very informative on the team without a bunch of confusing football jargon. Keep up the good work! :]

"A lot of fans were drawn to me because they knew that whatever the score was, I was going to run as hard as I could on every play. You don't have that now, you have guys waiting for next week or even next year." - Walter Payton

by Ashley Czuba on Dec 2, 2009 6:29 PM CST reply actions  

One of our few positives:

We have great special teams; there’s no denying that. We have the best kicker in the NFL, a very good punter, and several great return men.

by GouldisGold on Dec 2, 2009 7:01 PM CST reply actions  

There is a lot of talent on this team...

being wasted and misused. I would love to see Hester and Olsen as trade bait this offseason. IMO, Hester and Knox are the same guy, so why not get something we need for one of ‘em. Olsen is such a disappointment, I don’t see him having the “elite” TE status anymore. Hopefully some team will see his potential and trade for it, but I think the Bears should look to move him. The Bears need a DE, DT, FS, and one more CB. I think Graham can be a great nickel corner and emergency starter. I still want to see DJ Moore and Gilbert get some reps. I worry about G Adams, he’s just not very good, nor is he big.
On offense, the Bears need a LG, a true#1WR and a RT. I see Forte and Bell as a great tandem and Wolfe and/or Peterson can be a 3rd/4th RB. I see 6-8 player/position upgrades that could make this a playoff team.
Mostly, however, all of the coaches have to go away ASAP. They have taken much of this talent and abused it horribly. FIRE LOVIE NOW!

When you find yourself in a hole, STOP DIGGING!!!

by LostInSTL on Dec 2, 2009 8:38 PM CST reply actions  

Typical Moronic Sports Fan Comment

State the obvious, propose selling low on some of our most talented players, and last but not least, include a generic “fire _______” comment.

by Poloplaya14 on Dec 2, 2009 11:08 PM CST up reply actions  

Would it be Typical moronic sports fannish

to just say fire lovie? cause if it is ok, i just want to lay that out there…

But im with you on not understanding why everyone wants to trade hester. I am not liking Olsen this year, but he is young. Coach the kid up ya know? which brings me back to the fire lovie thing…

by GtM on Dec 3, 2009 1:41 AM CST up reply actions  

Have to disagree

LostinSTL’s contributions have never struck me as typical Chicago meathead – he’s given solid reasons for his ideas on trading Hester and Olsen, even if you don’t agree with them. A Typical Moronic Sports Fan Comment would be more like what you see in the game threads from the people who only turn up to whine, bitch and moan at the team.

As for the generic “fire Lovie” comment, who doesn’t want that?

"The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the intelligent are full of doubt." - Bertrand Russell
"F*** everybody outside of Halas Hall. BEARDOWN" - WavyGravy

by Spongie on Dec 3, 2009 3:36 AM CST up reply actions  

I don't agree with you at all

It’s more of a “typical moronic sports fan comment” when people want to get good players here or draft better players(when you don’t have picks until day2) without giving up any value. LostinSTL’s point is that to make up for the lack of draft choices that JA has traded away and to shore up areas of need, you need to look at what you have that might be attractive to other teams and weigh in whether you have enough depth at the positions your trading. WR/KR with the emergence of Knox and the failings the last 2 years of Hester’s KR results would make sense, Olsen has not lived up to his hype and Kellen Davis seems to be a decent fallback.

I’ve stated before that I’m not a advocate of just trading Hester for the sake of trading him, but if you can get value for him or Olsen, this team has too many needs not to entertain the thought.

by BearFan611 on Dec 3, 2009 7:18 AM CST up reply actions  

I've been called lots of things...

over the years. But Typical Moronic Sports Fan Commentator is a first for me. I’m touched.

I would like to thank the academy, my fellow WCG fans, and all those little people who paved my way to the top. (sheds a tear) And finally…this is for you mom and dad; YOU ALWAYS BELIEVED IN ME! (Runs off stage left).

When you find yourself in a hole, STOP DIGGING!!!

by LostInSTL on Dec 3, 2009 7:31 AM CST up reply actions  

Well played.

Golf clap….

If you can't laugh at yourself you must not be very funny.

by Just Dave on Dec 3, 2009 10:01 AM CST up reply actions  

Ick...

Here is the problem, I really like Kellen Davis, but he needs a lot more time to develop. We have built an offensive play book that really likes the two TE set. So, if we trade Olsen that leaves us with with an ailing and aging Clark and Davis. Not really what I’d like to see. Also, if you listen to the reports and watch the games Olsen gets double covered a good portion of the time because opposing teams know he doesn’t have the time to throw a deep ball. If a tight end is demanding double coverage I think he’s doing a fine job.

As far as Hester goes, his value to us greatly exceeds his trade value. Even when he was taking every other kick to the house he would have fetched at best a second round pick. Now he’s a second year WR who shows promise, there are tons of second year WR that show promise that you can grab in the draft in the second round pay less that you’re going to pay Hester. No team is biting on that deal.

I won’t repeat myself on the WR issue, I just think we have much bigger fish to fry including the rest that you mentioned.

by Jacob Hayes on Dec 3, 2009 12:19 PM CST up reply actions  

I was just trying to figure out...

what players the Bears have that would have any trade value at all. Those 2 are the only ones outside of Urlacher. Don’t see too many trades anyway in the NFL, so you’re right. Now I’m just clutching at straws to see if there is any way to upgrade the talent assuming the Bears aren’t getting more than a few late round selections in the next draft. Hopefully it’s FA bonanza time next year.

When you find yourself in a hole, STOP DIGGING!!!

by LostInSTL on Dec 3, 2009 2:23 PM CST up reply actions  

Well...

I’d say Briggs has the most trade value out of anyone on the team, but I’d really not want to see that happen.

by Jacob Hayes on Dec 3, 2009 3:02 PM CST up reply actions  

can't argue with those..

Now we just need a #1 WR, a shutdown CB, a beast DE and/or DT, and a completely retooled o-line, with no picks in rounds 1 or 2..and a FA market that is looking quite dull if half of it winds up stuck with their team due to the lack of CBA.

by Pretender85 on Dec 3, 2009 1:36 AM CST reply actions  

I think you're right except for the WR part.

We have four good and young WR, and I really am not a fan of bringing in another veteran “#1” WR that is going to take a lot of playing time from their development.

Both Hester and Knox have legitimate opportunity to develop into number one wide receivers, and even if they don’t and they are high level #2, if you have two high level #2 on the field with a really good possession guy like we’re hoping Bennett is, that’s enough.

Basically, the reason you worry about no having a #1 is because they are going to stick their best CB on your best WR a lot of the time, and if he’s getting dominated then your lesser WR may be getting dominated as well killing your passing game.

Neither Knox or Hester due to their speed are the types to be able to be completely taken out of a game by CB play alone, and certainly not both of them at the same time without drastically opening up the middle for Olson and Bennett

by Jacob Hayes on Dec 3, 2009 10:44 AM CST up reply actions  

You're exactly right on Knox

I’ve said this since they drafted him, that he would be the steal of the draft. Despite some rookie mistakes, he has shown that he is a much more polished receiver, at this stage of his career, than anyone else on the roster. When you take his speed into consideration and if he can ever get some decent coaching at the pro level, he could be a star in this league for many years.

by BearFan611 on Dec 3, 2009 6:45 AM CST reply actions  

if he can ever get some decent coaching at the pro level, he could be a star in this league for many years.

+1

I see him as a strong #3 or with the right strength conditioning and route/ ball fighting coaching
a good #2. He probably does not have the physical attributes to be an opposing #1, we will need to address that. Which leaves Hester, where does he fit in if we get that true #1? He will probably demand the salary of a #1 yet be nothing more than a 2 or 3.

by TheMan1 on Dec 3, 2009 12:05 PM CST up reply actions  

He has Miles Austin written all over him.

He needs to bulk up a few pounds in the offseason to work on fighting for the ball. That and some coaching and experience, and watch out!

by ChiLobo#23 on Dec 3, 2009 2:14 PM CST up reply actions  

Question?

You say Knox played CB on a play and attempted to punch the ball to save an INT? Are you talking about the INT play when Cutler underthew him in the endzone and got picked or a different play? You have to be talking about a different play because Knox didn’t do anything to save that pick. He could have easily came back on the ball and scored, but didn’t and the defender made a great play on an underthrown ball. I disagree completely about Knox. Yes he’s fast, and he has OK hands, but he is not a very good route runner and he never fights for the ball!! In time, yes, I think he will be a good WR, but right now, he’s playing out of necessity! I don’t remember the play you’re talking about so I’ll take your word for it, but he defintely didn’t fight for the ball on the INT play!!

by McRipper on Dec 3, 2009 9:20 AM CST reply actions  

If you go back and watch that play...

It’s essentially the same route as the touchdown pass was, that throw should by all rights been in front of Knox. That’s not a play/route where the WR if he did his job in the first place can come back and make a play for catching a very under thrown ball. You always hear about a QB throwing a ball so that only the WR has a shot at it, that ball was the exact opposite. Due to the seperation Knox had created he just wasn’t in position for the catch. However, if you watch the initial, and the replay, Knox realizes this and as Griffin gets two hands on the ball he takes a big swipe directly at the ball to attempt to break up the pass.

by Jacob Hayes on Dec 3, 2009 10:37 AM CST up reply actions  

Sorry dude

but his effort on that pass was piss poor!! Yeah he swiped at it, but it wasn’t until after the guy INT it!! I’m saying, put yourself in position to make the play. It was an underthrown ball, come back on the ball and make the play. Don’t let the ball come to you in that situation. It wasn’t a bullett!! He had enough time to slow down and at least be in better position to if not catch it, at least make sure the defender doesn’t catch it either!!

http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-game-highlights/09000d5d814990dc/NFL-GameDay-Bears-vs-Vikings-highlights

At about the 1:25 mark.

by McRipper on Dec 3, 2009 11:27 AM CST up reply actions  

I'm watching the replay on NFL replay as we speak...

I hate to repeat myself, but the route he was running did not allow him to come back to the ball like that. The only way he could have even attempted to get to that ball before the CB would have been blatant offensive pass interference, and he still wouldn’t have had much of a shot at it. When you’re running a route that goes to the back corner of the end zone and the ball ends up about two yards inside and at the goal line there just isn’t a way to make a play on that ball short of trying to knock the ball loose.

Griffin made a diving grab for the ball, so the first time Knox was in range to do anything to the ball was when he took a swipe at it and almost knocked it loose.

If you don’t think that’s showing an effort to break up an int, then please refer to every single INT Grossman threw to Bernard Berrian for an ample display of showing zero effort.

by Jacob Hayes on Dec 3, 2009 12:25 PM CST up reply actions  

+1

NO WAY he could have stopped a dead sprint and come back 2 yards to make that play.

McRipper, with all due respect, you are wrong on this one.

by BearFan611 on Dec 3, 2009 1:36 PM CST up reply actions  

He couldn't have?

He wasn’t dead sprint, he was looking back for the ball and was already starting to slow down. After watching that extra close, it’s hard because you can’t do slo-mo on it, it looks like he looks back too late and was late to react to the ball. I like Knox. I like him a lot actually. But he is very unpolished. I question his effort on that play not because he lacks heart, but because he lacks the skill at this point in his career!! It’s easy for me to say he should have made a better effort but this guy is a world class athlete. I’ve seen countless WRs make plays on balls that are underthrown.

by McRipper on Dec 3, 2009 2:23 PM CST up reply actions  

He's a rookie

and he’s playing like a rookie. Just like Al Afalava, Knox has big-play ability, coupled with rookie mistakes. And I’m not focusing on the one play y’all are arguing about… just a very generalized perspective.

Lucky for us, both are only going to get better as they get more games under their belts!

Oh, and someone mentioned earlier that Knox and Hester are virtually the same WR… i disagree because there is one gleaning difference in the two: Hester was a DB, and Knox has always been a pure WR.

You are all gentlemen (and ladies) and good judges of cheap whiskey.

by Dane Noble on Dec 3, 2009 2:29 PM CST up reply actions  

Agreed

Like I said, I like Knox a lot. But if the Bears had better WRs, he probably doesn’t get the playing time he has been. He’s definitely going to be better and that’s going to be good for the Bears, but he needs time to develop.

by McRipper on Dec 3, 2009 2:38 PM CST up reply actions  

Yeah, with that I can agree.

That’s why I’m pretty steadfastly against picking up a veteran #1. I think all of our WR are progressing pretty rapidly and as long as we have so many holes on both lines I hate to take away time from them.

by Jacob Hayes on Dec 3, 2009 3:04 PM CST up reply actions  

OK, I'll put in my 2 cents on this one...

Regardless of how the route was drawn up, the receiver should always play the ball when it’s up in the air. It was not a laser where he didn’t have the time to come back to it, it was a rainbow. He should’ve made a sight adjustment, come back to it, and at least make sure it’s an imcomplete instead of an INT.

I don’t blame Johnny too much, I mean the guy is a very unpolished rookie and his contributions, raw talent, and attitude make him a great find. But I’m hoping that with one or two more years of experience and coaching, he’ll learn to adjust to the ball better.

Which is another reason that we need DA on the field more, or to get someone we can deem a #1. It’s for that reason that I agree with McRipper. I don’t think it was a lack of effort on Knox’s part, but a lack of experience.

by ChiLobo#23 on Dec 3, 2009 2:20 PM CST up reply actions  

Agreed

That’s what I’m saying. If he would have made the catch, I would have shit my pants. That would have been a very difficult catch. All I was saying is that he should have at least made a better effort to break that pass up. Some people don’t think it was possible for him to do it but I disagree. That play wasn’t as bang bang as some are saying. That ball had more trajectory than velocity and it hung up there long enough for the defender to make a very good play on the ball. All I’m saying is that his effort, to me, wasn’t very good.

by McRipper on Dec 3, 2009 2:28 PM CST up reply actions  

I agree that it was more trajectory than velocity, but that's the problem...

That ball would have been easier to adjust to had it been a laser, the problem with a rainbow pass when you’re running full sprint to the corner is that you really can’t get an eye for the exact spot until it’s already well on it’s downward arc, whereas a straight pass you can easily just look where it’s headed at this second to figure out where it’s going to be the next two.

If that pass was so easy to adjust to, then Griffin who was in a better position to get the ball in the first place wouldn’t have needed to making a diving catch for it. I’m not trying to bag on you guys at all, but that pass on that route has to go where it is drawn to go to give the WR any kind of chance, it was almost the exact same route as the TD pass so you can watch that one to give a better idea of what it’s supposed to look like when thrown properly.

Basically, you guys are really underestimating the difficulty of projecting the trajectory of a thirty yard rainbow arced pass to the corner. You just can’t tell that it’s under thrown by two or three yards until it’s much too late. That’s also why you hear people coach that pass to either go to the WR or go out of bounds.

With all of that said, Knox really came close to knocking it loose even though he wasn’t in position.

by Jacob Hayes on Dec 3, 2009 3:01 PM CST up reply actions  

Agreed

the throw was terrible. That’s a given. Knox burned Griffin. That’s a given. Griffin made the play because he was so badly burned. If he would have stayed with Knox, it’s probably a jump ball and they both have to fight for it.

If Knox was in Griffin’s position, it would have been a perfect pass!!! haha

by McRipper on Dec 3, 2009 3:11 PM CST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Windy City Gridiron is the best independent site on the internet for breaking news, in-depth analysis, and hardcore discussion about the Chicago Bears

Community Guidelines

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Windycity_small Adam T

189886_210123485665309_100000029768895_888721_5830650_n__1__small Dane Noble

Editors

Sackwatchcutler_small Lester A. Wiltfong Jr.

Orange_shy_guy_small Steven Schweickert

Capture_small Kev H

Contributing Writers

Lincoln_small Sam Householder

Leprechaun_small Spongie

Polishsausage_small Steve Ronkowski

Cat_bonnet_small Pete Dixon

Icothgmts_small T.J. Shouse