Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Knicks Beat Lakers With Familiar Strategy

The case for changing the modern football helmet.

Wcg_thumb_notes_medium
It may sound crazy, but it's an idea that's received a small amount of attention with the recent focus on concussions and how to prevent them. The hard shelled helmet that we're familiar with came around in the early 80's, but hard shelled helmets in general have been around since the 50's.

The helmet was originally added to the game in order to prevent terrible injuries such as skull fractures that could literally cause sudden death if severe and unlucky enough, but people point both to the old style hard leather helmets and to the new style rugby helmets as protective equipment that both does the job it was designed for, and doesn't turn the players into human missiles.

Star-divide

All protective devices have a core purpose of preventing injuries, and sadly the modern football helmet is failing miserably at this task. We don't see skull fractures or anything like that, but instead due to the invulnerable nature they appear to provide generations of football players have been essentially taught to lead with the helmet on all possible tackles. Granted, it should be helmet to chest, but as that's only a few inches from helmet to helmet, and it's rare that a tackle is straight on in a game predicated on evading tackles.

So what does that give us? It gives us players leading with their helmet as they've been taught since peewee leagues, and it gives us lots of really terrible injuries of various kinds. The Tillman injury this week versus the Vikings is a prime example of the kind of injuries this helmet can cause. Since it turns the players into head first missiles they are literally bringing a massive blow with an extremely hard and unforgiving object into either pads that are forced to protect in some way against the blow, or into very vulnerable flesh and bone that can withstand the blow about as well as a person can withstand the blow from an aluminum bat.

That's only on the receiving end of the equation, and as we know every action has an equal and opposite reaction. We've seen tons of injuries stemming from leading with the helmet and they are usually of the worst kind being life threatening and sometimes altering or taking neck injuries. The neck simply isn't built to be a stabilizer for a spear head, it can be assisted with the collars you see a lot of players wisely wear, but it's still a game of roulette when you're laying down the lumber on an opposing player when you're going to come up on the losing end of the impact.

Now then, I'm going to stop short of advocating this change simply because I've not done near enough research or thought to put a stamp of approval on the idea. However, we've made many changes to the game for the protection of the players for much more dubious reasons such as the elimination of the "horse collar" tackle. The problem is as long as players wear such tank like helmets, they are going to continue to use them and themselves as human battering rams. While it's extremely fun to watch, something has to be done to not only help eliminate the debilitating effects of concussions on players that aren't QB, and the horrible injuries we see to players like Tillman coming from the practice.

As far as possible solutions, there are more than a few and thousands more waiting to be thought of. One such idea I've seen floated around is a modified procap type apparatus for a new helmet design. For those who haven't seen a procap in action, I'll provide a little bit of a visual aid.

Procapshell400_medium

Essentially it adds a somewhat crushable softer outer shell to the existing hard shell helmets. The upside of these are that they can be put on to any helmets you have out there today, and they supposedly do help lessen the impact  the so called cumulative smaller blows that many lineman and defensive players receive. The downside is that they do nothing to stop the neck injuries that occur from leading with the helmet, and don't do a lot to lessen the damage of a helmet to body hit.

Another option would be to roll the clock back, and then roll it forward again by going back to the soft helmet, but upgrading the technology into something akin to a modified rugby helmet.

15_medium

As you can see, these are very reminiscent of the late 40's hard leather helmets, however with much improved shock absorption technology. They apparently still aren't fantastic at completely preventing concussions, however they do their primary job of preventing fractures and other such damage quite well. Also, due to the lack of a hard shell they tend to discourage reckless leading with the helmet during tackles. These aren't bad, but I personally don't think they are ready for prime time in the slightest.

Also another currently available "option" is something akin to the modern hockey helmet. An example would be the m11 from Cascade.

Gallery-7-full_medium

As you can tell from the design it's very much reminiscent of a lacrosse helmet, minus the cage. In fact, if you took the technology from this helmet, and added to it a modified lacrosse cage, you'd come up with what I think might be the best option for future development if the NFL actually decides to go down the path of eliminating leading with the helmet altogether. Whatever they are doing in this helmet, apparently it's above average in reducing the G forces applied to the head to start with, but where it really shines is reducing the damage of repeated impacts in their test, exactly the kind of thing we're now seeing warnings about in the trenches of NFL O v D Line.

There are people still making the case for going helmet less, but I think that's a recipe for disaster and honestly something I don't want to see. I love the game of football, and I love seeing it played hard and fast like it should be, but when you're playing it like this accidental head contact is going to happens so some sort of protection will always be required. The question is do we keep going in the direction we are now, trying to make an invulnerable cage for the head and neck of the players, or do we solve the underlying issue that was caused by the helmets in the first place.

As an added bonus, I figure I'd add a link to the story I read about the history of the football helmet that inspired me to write this small piece.

Popular Mechanics 

Poll
Would you be open to a radical change in helmets and the game for the sake of safety?
Yes.
178 votes
No.
46 votes
Other(Please elaborate in the comments)
3 votes

227 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 9 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I'm all for it

I’m sure someone will come around and say “but football is football and you need a football helmet cuz that’s what they’ve always had duuuuuuur”

The reply to that kind of argument is that yes, football is football, but it’s evolved from no helmet at all to the point that it’s at now.

It would undoubtedly take some getting used to, I’m sure, but players are only getting BIGGER and hits are only getting HARDER. The leauge has to evolve with the players, or there are going to be more and more injuries.

by Virto on Dec 31, 2009 5:41 PM CST reply actions  

helmet logo

know ive posted this before but would like the bears to put a bear logo on their helmet and move on from that pinched C!!! every team has a cool logo on their helmets except a few maybe it will change the landscape!!

by achilles10 on Dec 31, 2009 7:40 PM CST reply actions  

Preposterous, the wishbone C is the best logo in sports, bar none.

I’m all for new helmets that lessen the risk of concussion, but I’m also one for not calling flags for “breathing on the quarterback” – so I’m kind of at a crossroad.

Is Jerry Angelo fired yet?
Is Vinny Del Negro fired yet?

by ES46NE10 on Jan 1, 2010 12:37 AM CST up reply actions  

I kind of thing the two go together...

You’d have much less diving head first at the QB’s knees if you didn’t have a tank helmet on the players, which would in turn lessen the need for breathing on the QB calls. At least in a perfect world anyway.

Associate Writer - WindyCityGridiron.com

by Jacob Hayes on Jan 1, 2010 9:42 AM CST up reply actions  

I think all options and technologies should be up for consideration

However, it’s hard to imagine how they’d go about phasing in a radical change such as a soft helmet or one with no face mask. Players would have to unlearn what they’ve learned, and there’d be a mix of timidity and broken noses for a while.

And this isn’t really a serious reason to nix the face mask-less models, but we had one attempted eye-poke thwarted last year and one thwarted this year thanks to the facemask slowing down or preventing the reach in. Wouldn’t want to see those out-of-control guys actually getting to other players’ faces.

I dunno. I like the idea of making helmets safer, but I don’t really want to do it by signficantly changing the way the game is played. Time for science to lead the way!

May the wind be always at your back, and may your placekicker have icewater in his veins.

by juperee on Dec 31, 2009 8:56 PM CST reply actions  

Just a quick note and additional info...

Lacrosse helmets are a lot like hockey helmets, but with face masks.

Associate Writer - WindyCityGridiron.com

by Jacob Hayes on Dec 31, 2009 10:09 PM CST reply actions  

1st 4

The first 4 words of this article says it all, CRAZY

by Brett Bear on Dec 31, 2009 10:30 PM CST reply actions  

hey

Play the game using avatars. If you haven’t seen the movie you won’t know what I am talking about.
My point is that there is a solution but it would also involve penalizing using the helmet as a weapon. Not just the helmet to helmet hit.
As I’ve posted elsewhere, the game is evolving away from a contact sport for better or worse.

"I am not an animal!" - Merrick

by Maelvampyre on Jan 1, 2010 10:37 AM CST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Windy City Gridiron is the best independent site on the internet for breaking news, in-depth analysis, and hardcore discussion about the Chicago Bears

Community Guidelines

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Parliament_small
What about Eddie Royal?
Burlacher2_small
Super Bowl Shuffle: 2012 REMIX
Jay_cutler_small
The 2012 WCG Bears Super Bowl Shuffle!
Images_small
Why Phil Emery has his work cut out for him.
Jay_cutler_small
Is a Trade for Brandon Marshall In the Works?
Jay_cutler_small
Free Agency Extravaganza!
Smoked_meat_066_small
Pro-Bowl is a joke, and needs to go
Small
Decisions Await New Bears GM on Draft Day
Bears_small
Senior Bowl Recap
Jay_cutler_small
Why Phil Emery Was the Right Choice For GM

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Windycity_small Adam T

189886_210123485665309_100000029768895_888721_5830650_n__1__small Dane Noble

Editors

Sackwatchcutler_small Lester A. Wiltfong Jr.

Orange_shy_guy_small Steven Schweickert

Capture_small Kev H

Contributing Writers

Lincoln_small Sam Householder

Leprechaun_small Spongie

Polishsausage_small Steve Ronkowski

Cat_bonnet_small Pete Dixon

Icothgmts_small T.J. Shouse