Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Kobe Bryant Isn't Up To Speed On Jeremy Lin, 'Linning'

An Open Letter to the Bears and Chicago Parks: FieldTurf in 2010

Soldier-field--chicago-bears_medium Dear Chicago Bears/Wonderful City of Chicago,

For many years now, we've watched the Chicago Bears play at the magnificent stadium known as Soldier Field. A testament to old-school football, it's served as a pilgrimage to many fans. It epitomizes everything about what is loved about the historic NFL franchises: classic styling(with a modern touch), and a throwback to the fields of old. The weathered grass of Soldier Field, cold and brown and dying by October, often serves as an analogy to the happenings on the field. Mr. Dan Pompei of the tribune writes that you're maybe leaning towards considering a new surface.

It's something that needs to change. As soon as possible. Let's look at some reasons why below....

Star-divide

The ever changing NFL landscape

There are currently 11 NFL Stadiums that are using the FieldTurf system. Those are as follows:

Paul Brown Stadium -- Cincinnati Bengals
Edward Jones Dome-- St. Louis Rams
Ford Field-- Detroit Lions
Georgia Dome-- Atlanta Falcons
Giants Stadium-- New York Giants/New York Jets
Gillette Stadium-- New England Patriots
Hubert H. Humphrey Metrodome-- Minnesota Vikings
Louisiana Superdome-- New Orleans Saints
Lucas Oil Stadium-- Indianapolis Colts
Qwest Field-- Seattle Seahawks
Rogers Centre-- Toronto (for the Bills Games in Toronto)

(note: this list doesn't include all of the teams that practice on FieldTurf. That's about 15, if you're counting)

Now let's analyze this list a bit. For starters, you're looking at several of the consistently tops teams in the NFL (Giants, Patriots, Colts) are using the surface. It's a fast playing surface, designed for high power, quick teams. You know, like the team you're consistently trying to build with undersized, quick defensive players, and speedy, undersized wide receivers.

Secondly, there are not one, but
two
 teams in your division who have made the switch. One of those teams has put together quite the package that fits really well into the stadium conditions, with big quick guys who can make plays. The other team is the Lions. If it's good for your most direct competitors, surely it wouldn't hurt to give it a try for the Bears.

Just today we watched a running back slip, at his own goalline, while trying to plant and run for a running play. Why is this? Because the newly laid sod had no chance to take hold, and came up in a big chunk off of his shoe. Little plays like this could easily be the difference between a positive play, or a terribly negative one. I'd hate to think what the reaction ofthe fans would have been if that slip had caused a safety, or even worse, a fumble and touchdown for the woeful St. Louis Rams. Slipping and unsure footing issues like this lead us to....

Player Safety

Inherently, injury rates between natural grass and field turf are about the same. However, the types of injuries are radically different. The American Journal of Sports Medicine did a study showing that while injury rates were generally the same, the most common types of field turf injuries were skin injuries and muscles strains. Playing on grass causes players to be more susceptible to things like concussions, and ligament tears. These kinds of injuries are much more serious, and a stronger cause for concern, as they can directly affect player productivity and future health. (Source)

Players love it, too.They say that it tends to feel softer, providing cushion for falls, and has stronger footing, but without gripping the foot. This helps ease the stress on the knees of those making quick cuts or big time plays. Don't just believe me though. USA Today was kind enough to do a story on the subject.

 I'd also like to address something that I know is near and dear to both the team and the city's heart....

Cost

I realize that this isn't a cheap endeavor. Estimates that I've seen suggest that you're looking at a million, million and a half dollars to redo Soldier Field in FieldTurf. That's a lot, I know, I mean, we do have to give that to players who aren't playing. 

Still, the field has had to be resodded twice, just in the 2009 season. The first time, after U2 was in the stadium tearing the field up RIGHT BEFORE THE SEASON OPENER, and again over these past two weeks, as the old, hard ground just wasn't growing grass anymore.  This has cost roughly $500,000. Had the investment been made before the season started, you'd be over 30% of the way towards paying for it, instead of the sunk expensive cost of replacing and recycling sod all the time.

And finally....

Potential

If 33 of 49 Bears (source) think the field is absolutely terrible, what about players from other teams? As the team will need to heavily build through free agency for the next couple of years, why would other players want to come to an injury-inducing, uncomfortable field?  Luring players to your team isn't just about throwing money at them, or convincing them that they'll be your pretty little princess--you have to show them they'll have the tools to succeed. While there are some chasing the the all powerful coin, there are plenty who believe in playing for tradition, respect, and the ring. Show them a reason to think that will happen in Chicago>

An investment in FieldTurf is an investment in the vitality and future of the Chicago Bears, and the City of Chicago. Please make this a top-10 priority for the organization.

Sincerely,

Kev H

Comment 19 comments  |  2 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Throw in a new field, along with a new D, new O-line, new OC, and heck while we are at it, throw in a new HC, just for good measure.

I like that idea, and it would probably help out, but you cant start suturing a torn bicep before attending to your liver and spleen that are hanging out of your colon. Great post, nonetheless

"All they do is mock me, just like they did the fat fellow. All the time mocking, mocking, mocking, mocking all the time! Now, it is Babu's turn to mock "---Babu Bhatt in the Seinfeld Finale Part 2

P.S.
"The fact of the matter is the chicago bulls have never been a contender since I left..."----Johnny Kilroy

by chi_till_eye_die on Dec 7, 2009 7:29 PM CST reply actions  

Well, realistically speaking...

…you can in this case. You’re looking at a million, million and a half dollar expenditure that will save you money long term.

I'm a firm believer in the philosophy of a ruling class. Especially since I rule. -Randal Graves

by Kev H on Dec 7, 2009 7:32 PM CST up reply actions  

And a new GM while your at it.

I hear Bill Parcells likes good Italian food…hey it’s a start.

by MetalGearPeaceWalker on Dec 7, 2009 7:48 PM CST up reply actions  

I hear Bill Parcells likes good Italian food

Though, who doesn’t?

"The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the intelligent are full of doubt." - Bertrand Russell
"F*** everybody outside of Halas Hall. BEARDOWN" - WavyGravy

by Spongie on Dec 8, 2009 7:10 AM CST up reply actions  

...

I don’t know. I am old-fashioned and am proud that we have a natural field. I hate dome stadiums and artificial turf. It just doesn’t seem right.

by jeepdays on Dec 7, 2009 8:16 PM CST reply actions   1 recs

I would prefer a natural field....

….if we could grow it for half of the season. But we can’t, so they end up playing in mud or dirt, and then on loose sod. it’s dangerous and counter-productive to the team design.

I'm a firm believer in the philosophy of a ruling class. Especially since I rule. -Randal Graves

by Kev H on Dec 7, 2009 8:20 PM CST up reply actions   1 recs

Old-fashioned?
I am old-fashioned and am proud that we have a natural field.

Well, you can’t be that ‘old-fashioned’, or you’d remember that Soldier Field had artificial turf from 1970-1987. Walter Payton played his entire career on green cement, and the park district put in natural turf for the 1988 season, the year after he retired.

Now, if by ‘old-fashioned’ you mean you harken back to the days of the Bears in Wrigley Field, well, then that’s another thing. But so many Bears fans forget that Soldier Field originally had artificial turf, and that natural grass is a ‘newer’ phenomenon.

by Sweetness Lives On on Dec 8, 2009 4:19 AM CST up reply actions  

(rolling eyes)

I’m old school too I want a brick wall right next to the end zone.

We are the worlds dumbest city!- Dan Bernstein

by SoulEater7 on Dec 8, 2009 9:13 AM CST up reply actions  

I wouldn't be so sure about the players' preference.

http://www.athleticturf.net/athleticturf/article/articleDetail.jsp?id=148868
Survey during 2004 season showing players preferred a natural surface.

http://www.synturf.org/images/2008_NFLPA_Surface_Survey.pdf
Survey during 2008 season showing players preferred a natural surface.

I would like to see a quality natural surface and drainage system put in since Soldier Field obviously doesn’t have one. Something like the Desso (or DD) GrassMaster surface, which is still grass but prevents chunks of sod coming out.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Desso_GrassMaster
http://www.surfacesolutionsna.com/ddgrassmaster_faq.asp

It is in use at 4 NFL fields, two of which are liked (Denver and Green Bay) and two of which are hated (Pittsburgh and Philadelphia). The two hated fields’ problems likely stem from overuse, sound familiar? Denver was the highest rated cold weather grass surface. Whatever surface is used, it won’t matter of bit if it isn’t properly maintained and overused.

by Spotacus on Dec 7, 2009 9:46 PM CST reply actions  

The 2004 survey--

—doesn’t include the fieldturf surfaces in most of the stadiums I listed, as they were installed after that. Specifically, the article you linked talks about Astroturf as being one of the most hated. I couldn’t seem to get the 2004 survey to actually come up, so I couldn’t read it’s results.

The 2008 survey is interesting, thanks for the link, but i wonder how it gels with the Journal of Sports Medicine study I linked. Players may think it, but is it true?

My response to player preference is between the difference of playing on the current field, or a reasonably cheap alternative. As I responded to jeepdays, I would prefer a natural field myself, if we could grow one. But they way they use the stadium and the way weather goes in Chicago, I think it would be a better alternative to go with a widely used (between practice fields and stadiums) surface in the league.

I'm a firm believer in the philosophy of a ruling class. Especially since I rule. -Randal Graves

by Kev H on Dec 7, 2009 10:22 PM CST up reply actions  

If the park district could do a better job with the grass like GB does I would say keep it.

But they don ‘t and I’m sick of watching players slipping and constant complaints about the poor quality. So just bring in field turf in, if you ever walked on field turf you’d realize it’s just smarter grass. You can’t tell the difference and it looks better than real grass.

Or you could go the meat head route bring lovie, Jerry and the grass back. We can just continue to complain all next season.

We are the worlds dumbest city!- Dan Bernstein

by SoulEater7 on Dec 7, 2009 11:08 PM CST reply actions  

Don't forget dropping over half a mil

as we go through the situation.

I'm a firm believer in the philosophy of a ruling class. Especially since I rule. -Randal Graves

by Kev H on Dec 7, 2009 11:36 PM CST up reply actions  

I'd vote for the Grassmaster with heating

It’s mostly natural with artificial fibers for reinforcing. We’d have to have it heated to keep the natural grass alive during the cold. Not sure how the surface would hold up for all the concerts they like to schedule during the season.

by SaintCee on Dec 8, 2009 2:16 AM CST reply actions  

I think that under the reconstruction of the field

that they have new underground heating and draining systems in place.

"You win because of the quarterback. We have to get that position stabilized. We're fixated on that." -- Jerry Angelo (12.30.2008)

Jerry Angelo trades for Jay Cutler! (4.2.2009)
.

by SackMan on Dec 8, 2009 10:37 AM CST up reply actions  

I used to be for real grass

but have since changed. The old Astroturf was TERRIBLE, the new stuff is 100 times better. Fieldturf is the way to go.

by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Dec 8, 2009 9:32 AM CST reply actions  

The Chicago Park is absolutely horrible at maintaining the playing surfaces

not only at Soldier Field… but also at all of the parks throughout the city. I play softball downtown in Grant Park in Spring and Summer, and I can’t tell you many times we’ve had games canceled, because the fields are still not in playable condition 2 or 3 days after a rainfall.

The issue is not the type of playing surface. The issue is the Park District.

And, to make matters worse, if your ripped it all up, and placed artificial turf there… they’d probably paint the turf incorrectly. Ha.

"You win because of the quarterback. We have to get that position stabilized. We're fixated on that." -- Jerry Angelo (12.30.2008)

Jerry Angelo trades for Jay Cutler! (4.2.2009)
.

by SackMan on Dec 8, 2009 10:42 AM CST reply actions  

Field Turf Right Decision

I live in Oregon where grass seed is one of the top agriculture products of our state. Even so, both the University of Oregon and Oregon State have field turf. Natural grass just doesn’t hold up in our wet Northwest Novembers. Both the Bears and the Steelers need to make the move to Field Turf. As long as there are other users of the surface natural grass will continue to be a problem.

"Sometimes I wonder whether the world is being run by smart people who are putting us on or by imbeciles who really mean it." - Mark Twain

by phastphil on Dec 8, 2009 11:51 AM CST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Windy City Gridiron is the best independent site on the internet for breaking news, in-depth analysis, and hardcore discussion about the Chicago Bears

Community Guidelines

Managers

Windycity_small Adam T

189886_210123485665309_100000029768895_888721_5830650_n__1__small Dane Noble

Editors

Sackwatchcutler_small Lester A. Wiltfong Jr.

Orange_shy_guy_small Steven Schweickert

Capture_small Kev H

Contributing Writers

Lincoln_small Sam Householder

Leprechaun_small Spongie

Polishsausage_small Steve Ronkowski

Cat_bonnet_small Pete Dixon

Icothgmts_small T.J. Shouse