Chicago Bears Position Breakdowns: Wide Receiver
The Chicago Bears' second Achilles' heel this season has been the wide receiver position, as they have had few strong receivers over the past few years.
Last season, they had brought back Marty Booker (now gone) and tried their hand with Brandon Lloyd (unrightfully gone).
The Bears still held on to Devin Hester, Earl Bennett and Rashied Davis as those who will likely be the main receivers if they decide to keep their current roster through to next season.
However, most who look at the Bears see them as a team that needs to make a move and add a receiver to become contenders next season.
So what does a look at the Bears receiving core reveal?
How are we looking now?
Devin Hester was a player who got better and better as the season progressed and as he was able to learn his position, which hurt his returning ability and, some say, his chances of ever becoming a star.
However, with the number of catches that he had, he actually had a good year. He had over 600 yards and averaged 13 yards per catch.
Although he never had one great, breakthrough game, he consistently had between 50-80 yards and was a constant threat to take a catch all the way for a touchdown, even though he only had three on the year.
Rashied Davis has been an average receiver throughout his entire time as a Bear. Although he was never great, he was never bad and he was somewhat reliable in big situations, just like his game winning catch against the Vikings a few years back.
Davis had 445 yards receiving last year despite having either one or no catches in seven games last year. He averaged just under 13 yards per catch and didn't do anything special.
Earl Bennett was looked at as a rookie who could develop into a strong receiver, but was buried under failed attempts to revive the careers of both Marty Booker and Brandon Lloyd, so Bennett had no catches last season.
Possible Free Agent Acquisitions
T.J Housmandzadeh: Although I think it is unlikely that he will ultimately choose Chicago as his home, he is available and the Bears should get into the bidding.
Shaun McDonald: This is a player I like because he has been a back up his entire career to some great players (eg: Tory Holt) and could be a diamond in the rough, only a lot cheaper.
If the Bears don't get their receiver position fixed soon, they could be stuck on another season where the passing game is average at best and their offense goes nowhere, expect a move, and it could be for one of these two.
39 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Not sure
how we are going to fix it. The only decent FA is Housh and I’m not crazy about giving big money to a 32 yr old (See Moose..). Unless they could pull off a deal for Chad Johnson or Boldin or trade up in the draft to get Maclin. Otherwise we are going to get a second round guy that probably won’t contribute right away (maybe we get lucky with Nicks – rd 2).
Housh
is 31, doesn’t depend on speed, has less years on his body than Moose, and has way better hands than Moose. Not saying I think it will or should happen, but the Moose comparison isn’t accurate.
DEJESUS!!!
Birthday
Birth Date September 26, 1977 . He will be 32 at start of season. Moose had good hands before he got here as well. I don’t want to pay $6-8mm per year for an aging wr. It is completely accurate comparison. He also doesn’t have Carson Palmer throwing to him anymore..
Housh
caught 92 balls last year with the worst qb in football throwing to him. He consistently gets open and makes catches, something that Moose never did. Moose had one good season, otherwise he was a very mediocre, 60 catch a season guy. Housh has been consistently catching 90-100 balls a year, and he has less mileage on him than Moose did at this point in his career. The only real comparison between the two is their age, and even that isn’t an equitable comparison because Moose had played significantly more years in the league by that time. Moose is more of a deep threat who depends in speed and quickness to get open after 10 yards. Housh relies on precise routes and body control, something that is much more likely to hold up into his mid 30s.
DEJESUS!!!
Moose
is a speed guy?? since when? Are you reviewing 1999 game film? He has been a possession receiver for a long time. Here is another little nugget on Housh, his receiving partner is CHAD JOHNSON. Do you see anyone like that on the Bears? So how is it that Housh who we will be paying $7mm per year, will get free of double teams on a consistent basis?? By the way, a 32 yr old man is still a 32 yr old man and his physical abilities are still deteriorating. He is a wr not a rb, the mileage doesn’t really work. Was housh not running all those years?? Look I like housh but he will not be worth the money at his age when we can spend it in other areas. If he would take say $5mm then maybe..
The 2 years
before the Bears got him, he averaged 15 yards per catch. That’s not possession receiver.
Chad Johnson was not effective last year the Bengals had a terrible QB, and Housh still caught 90 balls. I am not making the argument that it makes financial or even good football sense to sign him (it may, but that’s not what I am saying). I am saying that he’s not Moose. If Moose had been signed by the 49ers that year, nobody would be making the comparison. It’s only because a FA receiver about the same age as Moose is available.
Not need to get hostile.
DEJESUS!!!
See Moose?
Umm…
2008: 65 grabs, 14.2 Average with 5 TD’s.
Moose had a big problem in Chicago all right…
Rex.
I am really hoping that we
address WR in the second round (1st being OLine).
Second rounders are far more productive typically than 3rd rounders and beyond…
i before e, except after c, when c makes a soft sound....
What about Branden Rideau?
He looked great in the preseason and didn’t ever really get much of a shot. Also, what bringing in Kellen Davis a good portion of the time and kick Olsen out to WR? He’s huge and not super fast, but I think we all remember the circus catches in preseason last year. He wouldn’t be a deep threat, but if you had him, Hester, Clark and Olsen all on the field at the same time it could be scary to try to defend.
Not that this is completely related
but just saying: Kellen Davis is the primary reason we couldn’t convert 4th and 1 on the fullback dive this year. He got manhandled at the LOS.
"You win because of the quarterback. We have to get that position stabilized. We're fixated on that.
We know it's the most valuable position on the football team. We've gone through so many scenarios at that position we can write a book, moreso on what not do."
-- Jerry Angelo (12.30.2008)
.
No question about it-
He’s a major downgrade from Gilmore from a blocking standpoint, but as a receiver he looked good. Hell, send him out as a WR and keep Olsen (slightly better blocker) in tight, either way-
I was waiting all year for a 3 TE package on short yardage
That Orton could go play-action on and pass to Davis.
"You win because of the quarterback. We have to get that position stabilized. We're fixated on that.
We know it's the most valuable position on the football team. We've gone through so many scenarios at that position we can write a book, moreso on what not do."
-- Jerry Angelo (12.30.2008)
.
problem is...
… we already have to receiver-first tight ends. We don’t really have a very good blocking tight end.
Bringing moderation to a place I don't moderate.
visit the mindful mission
by big_lowitzki on Feb 19, 2009 5:20 PM CST up reply actions
keep in mind too...
it was the infamous fullback dive too, not like it was a play that worked out well for us much this season.
Yep.
The Panthers KNEW it was coming the second time we ran it. But, Davis always got blown up on it anyway.
"You win because of the quarterback. We have to get that position stabilized. We're fixated on that.
We know it's the most valuable position on the football team. We've gone through so many scenarios at that position we can write a book, moreso on what not do."
-- Jerry Angelo (12.30.2008)
.
Your Right...
Tim Tebow converts that 4th down.
Just checked his combine stats,
http://www.nfldraftscout.com/ratings/dsprofile.php?pyid=61174&draftyear=2008&genpos=TE
looked pretty quick for a guy that big, he may be giant version of Randy Moss, who knows…
He's a beast
He didn’t block as well as expected, but he has the ability to do anything the Bears ask from him. He’ll get better at the POA and be a huge target for Orton in the middle of the field. I still believe the ‘08 draft will be great when it’s all said and done.
"I'm not so mean. I wouldn't ever go out to hurt anybody deliberately - unless it was, you know, important, like a league game or something." - Dick Butkus
TEs mask some WR problems
I’m not saying that the current WR corps is fine. I’d definitely like to see something added. But the thing is, you can’t look at only WRs. You have a receiving corps, which includes your WRs AND your TEs. And out TEs are good enough that they can make up for some of the problems at WR.
People seem to have this view that our receivers are Hester and nothing. Not true. Our receivers are Hester, Olsen, Clark and nothing (small joke). Now, that may not be what you want, but it’s not far from a respectable set. Adding a good #1.5 receiver (think Eddie Kennison in his KC days) would make me comfortable.
Also…Brandon Lloyd was unrightfully let go? Dude had one good game? What makes you think we should have kept him?
He had one good game
as well as some great catches. The reason he only had one good game is because he got hurt then was put too far down on the depth chart to make any noise. When he played he played well and I would have liked to see more of him.
Make every play lead the way to victory
I think we need to add
one FA WR and one through the draft. I’d like to see maybe Bryant Johnson in FA and Iglesias through the draft.
DEJESUS!!!
Can they fix their woes? yes.
However I don’t think one off season is going to be able to accomplish the feat. The position is so awful and it needs to be majorly overhauled. Unless Jerry decides to go all out for that position, it will not be fixed this off season..
#34: You'll be missed!
Idealistically
the Lions could win the Super Bowl next year.
but my gut feeling is also no.
Make every play lead the way to victory
Think about it
Right now, the steelers have the same record as the lions. scary, huh?
"blah, blah, blah, yadda, yadda, yadda and we'll go from there"
-Lovie Smith
by ifuwannacrownem on Feb 19, 2009 10:41 PM CST up reply actions
53% of you so far say, no, we can't fix our WR woes.
I get the feeling that some of you enjoy pouting and sulking in your sorrows.
Passion For The Game, Loyal To The Name, Chicago Bears, I Trust In Thee, Standing Strong Since 1983.
I was actually assuming that
the poll would be more heavily in favor of no, something more like 60%. However, if Hester lives up to his potential, the Bears could have a big part of the WR problem fixed without having to go and find anybody.
Make every play lead the way to victory
WR woes up the ying-yang
I wouldn’t mind McDonald coming in to compete for a starting job. Add him and a rookie within the first two rounds of the draft. JA is too snake-bitten from Moose to pursue Housh.
"I'm not so mean. I wouldn't ever go out to hurt anybody deliberately - unless it was, you know, important, like a league game or something." - Dick Butkus
Wow...
Not that I am interpreting it to mean anything… but at the moment, the poll is 155-156.
Never seen a poll with that many votes be so close.
Things will get better as they improve...

by 














