Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Animated GIFs Of January

1st Round Mock Draft v.1.0

Courtesy of ChiFan13:

 

Bearspick1_medium

 

Star-divide

1. Detroit Lions
Matthew Stafford, QB, Georgia
2. St. Louis Rams
Andre Smith, OT, Alabama
3. Kansas City Chiefs
Michael Crabtree, WR, Texas Tech
4. Seattle Seahawks
Aaron Curry, LB, Wake Forest
5. Cleveland Browns
Knowshon Moreno, RB, Georgia
6. Cincinnati Bengals
Brian Orakpo, DE/OLB, Texas
7. Oakland Raiders
Jeremy Maclin, WR, Missouri
8. Jacksonville Jaguars
Jason Smith, OT, Baylor
9. Green Bay Packers
Malcolm Jenkins, CB, Ohio State
10. San Francisco 49ers
B.J. Raji, DT, Boston College
11. Buffalo Bills
Brandon Pettigrew, TE, Oklahoma State
12. Denver Broncos
Brian Cushing, LB, USC
13. Washington Redskins
Eugene Monroe, OT, Virginia
14. New Orleans Saints
Everett Brown, DE/OLB, Florida State
15. Houston Texans
Vontae Davis, CB, Illinois
16. San Diego Chargers
Aaron Maybin, DE/OLB, Penn State
17. New York Jets
Rey Maualuga, LB, USC
18. Chicago Bears
Michael Oher, OT, Ole Miss
19. Tampa Bay Buccaneers
Chris Wells, RB, Ohio State
20. Detroit Lions
Larry English, DE/OLB, Northern Illinois
21. Philadelphia Eagles
Percy Harvin, WR, Florida
22. Minnesota Vikings
Alex Mack, C, California
23. New England Patriots
NFL TEAM
James Laurinaitis, LB, Ohio State
24. Atlanta Falcons
Hakeem Nicks, WR, North Carolina
25. Miami Dolphins
NFL TEAM
Darrius Heyward-Bey, WR, Maryland
26. Baltimore Ravens
D.J. Moore, CB, Vanderbilt
27. Indianapolis Colts
LeSean McCoy, RB, Pittsburgh
28. Philadelphia Eagles (from Carolina Panthers)
Peria Jerry, DT, Ole Miss
29. New York Giants
Michael Johnson, DE, Georgia Tech
30. Tennessee Titans
Alphonso Smith, CB, Wake Forest
31. Arizona Cardinals
NFL TEAM
Tyson Jackson, DE, LSU
32. Pittsburgh Steelers
Eben Britton, OT, Arizona

Comment 71 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

A quick note

before everyone starts:

I really believe that Sanchez won’t be as impressive at the combine, thus his absence from this list. Someone may bite on Sanchez out of desperate need, but we’ll see how the rest of the pre-draft festivities go.

Second, Freeman definitely isn’t worthy of a 1st round selection.

I'M A MAN! I'M 22!

by ChiFan13 on Feb 6, 2009 2:32 PM CST reply actions  

Bad year for 1st round QB's

Other than Crabtree, there’s no other players worth trading up to get.

Old Style is the nectar of life.
http://www.windycitygridiron.com

by Mordecai on Feb 6, 2009 2:35 PM CST reply actions  

I'm for that

That guy is the real deal.

Having said that, I really would be quite happy with Oher.

by sabbath999 on Feb 6, 2009 8:31 PM CST up reply actions  

i like that pick of Oher

gotta get the oline in place

---AC 00 00 00 - Believe

by mjk83 on Feb 6, 2009 2:53 PM CST reply actions  

Totally agree...

But no chance Oher is on the board at 18.

Things will get better as they improve...

by Dane Noble on Feb 6, 2009 3:09 PM CST up reply actions  

I don't know about that

All we need are a couple strong showings at the combine and Oher could fall.

For instance, take Sanchez. IF (and real big if) he has a strong combine and jumps to top 15, Oher keeps dropping.

I realize that Oher probably won’t fall to us, but it realistically could happen.

I'M A MAN! I'M 22!

by ChiFan13 on Feb 6, 2009 3:14 PM CST up reply actions  

Wanna bet?

Oher will go top 5, IMHO.

Things will get better as they improve...

by Dane Noble on Feb 6, 2009 3:16 PM CST up reply actions  

Check your email on draft day

I’ll send you my mailing address and you can send me that peppermint you were tellin me about in December.

I will absolutely bet Oher doesn’t go top 5. Top 10? Maybe.

I'M A MAN! I'M 22!

by ChiFan13 on Feb 6, 2009 3:19 PM CST up reply actions  

I can't wait to have it...

It should be arriving at my door around finals time. No better time for a peppermint!

I'M A MAN! I'M 22!

by ChiFan13 on Feb 6, 2009 3:29 PM CST up reply actions  

Yeah I would be fine w/ another OT

It all starts up front. Also glad you explained the Sanchez leave out. I have a feeling even if he did bad someone would take him in the first and Kiper and all those guys would be stressing things like “Well he has the strongest arm!” and “He has the most upside!” maybe a team with a veteran that isn’t sure about the long term stability (i.e. Jets if Farve were back or Bucs or Seahawks or even the Rams (Most likely second round for the last two there…)

by Sam Householder on Feb 6, 2009 2:59 PM CST reply actions  

Hmmm..

I think the Packers would draft a lineman or LB to play in Dom Capers’ 3-4.

I'm not going to even bother trying to update this sig everyday anymore... that's what the standings column on ESPN is for.
Updated on May 25, 2008

by SackMan on Feb 6, 2009 3:04 PM CST reply actions  

They definitely need a CB tho

and Malcolm Jenkins fits their need nicely.

Otherwise, I think Orakpo might fall enough for the Packers to get him. That would be really bad.

I'M A MAN! I'M 22!

by ChiFan13 on Feb 6, 2009 3:06 PM CST up reply actions  

Are you thinking they

play Woodson at safety?

Being Who You Thought We Were Since 2005!

by Adam T on Feb 6, 2009 3:11 PM CST up reply actions  

They have already

said that was not their plan. Granted that means squat.

Being Who You Thought We Were Since 2005!

by Adam T on Feb 6, 2009 3:38 PM CST up reply actions  

Yeah, but if they want their 3-4 to truly succeed

they’ll need Woodson there. Like I said, if Brian Orakpo falls, I bet the Packers will take him over Jenkins.

I'M A MAN! I'M 22!

by ChiFan13 on Feb 6, 2009 3:40 PM CST up reply actions  

I know it had to be done, but seems anti productive

to take your best pass rusher and make him a linebacker.

Being Who You Thought We Were Since 2005!

by Adam T on Feb 6, 2009 3:51 PM CST up reply actions  

agreed...

You’re basically removing Kampman from putting pressure into the backfield by at least 25%, minimum… doesn’t seem ideal…

-Jmac

by isuarch80 on Feb 6, 2009 4:04 PM CST up reply actions  

on second thought

FANTASTIC move!!!!

Being Who You Thought We Were Since 2005!

by Adam T on Feb 6, 2009 11:39 PM CST up reply actions  

um

might as well have have the bears drafting stafford, crabtree or tebow…. oher will not be on the board at 18.

at 18 i think Harvin, duke robinson or rey mualaga are possibilities and i want them in that order.

i doubt mualaga falls to 18, but if he does hes too good to pass up. dude would start over nic roach or HH in the 4-3 which gives us an instant starter and possible stud/gamechanger for a good % of snaps on defense. He reminds me of troy polamalu for obvious reasons, but mainly the way he tackles. Could he play SS? Even if not our SLB position is wide open and we play a base 4-3 d…

by No It All on Feb 6, 2009 5:33 PM CST reply actions  

Lol...

I would be shocked if you posted without mentioning Tebow. April of 2010, huh?

Things will get better as they improve...

by Dane Noble on Feb 6, 2009 5:42 PM CST up reply actions  

What?

Why Harvin? We wouldn’t be upgrading our WR corps.

Robinson? Mr. Yellow Flag himself.

Maualuga? Seriously? A LB? Yeah, that’s just what we need.

I'M A MAN! I'M 22!

by ChiFan13 on Feb 6, 2009 5:46 PM CST up reply actions  

Harvin instantly upgrades our WR corps. rashied davis and earl bennett v. harvin = harvin wins

“Mr. Yellow Flag himself”… u wanna pass on DR (6-5 330) because he got called for penalties IN COLLEGE! that is very stupid if he is any good.

Nic Roach + Hunter Hillenmeyer= we need a strong side LineBacker
      maybe OL is the greater need, but the OL talent will not be as premium at 18 as the LB talent. best player avail. at a position of need, not best OT on the board.

by No It All on Feb 6, 2009 6:16 PM CST up reply actions  

Here we go again

Harvin is Devin Hester part deux. We need a tall, physical wide receiver, not a small quick one. And by the way, don’t use Rashied Davis or EB in a comparison.

Robinson? No, I’m not that big of a fan. He doesn’t really “wow” me.

The Sam backer is NOT an area of need. You know what is a real need? Safety. Offensive Line. Wide Receiver (anyone that’s not named Harvin). Quarterback.

We do not need to waste a first round pick on a linebacker.

I'M A MAN! I'M 22!

by ChiFan13 on Feb 6, 2009 6:25 PM CST up reply actions  

“And by the way, don’t use Rashied Davis or EB in a comparison.” 1st i’ll compare whatever i want. 2nd those are the bears wrs not hester. you said adding harvin “wouldn’t be upgrading our WR corps.” comparing harvin to our current wrs [Rashied Davis or EB!!] proves that harvin would be an upgrade and makes perfect sense. sorry your mock draft blows and all….

by No It All on Feb 6, 2009 6:31 PM CST up reply actions  

Do your own, then talk

And coming from the guy who wants Tim Tebow as our draft choice next year, I’m feeling ok.

I'M A MAN! I'M 22!

by ChiFan13 on Feb 6, 2009 7:40 PM CST up reply actions  

Chifan I couldn't agree with you more

though I personally want Maclin, I doubt he’ll be there but if Oher falls to us you gotta take him. And it is just as likely he falls as Maualuga, and Maualuga plays inside. I would actually take both outside lb’s from USC before moving Maualuga. While he may be great inside, he often gets flustered and just blows up the line of scrimmage, Good for inside, not in pass protection though. And Harvin?! He is a poor mans Reggie Bush, jack of all trades, master of none, and probably won’t make it through camp without getting hurt. Cant improve the receiving core from the trainers room. He doesn’t deserve the 18th pick nor does Robinson. Having said that, I say we reach for Darius Heyward-Bey. Now I don’t think it will be as far a reach after the combine but if we go wide-receiver in the first round, I want a guy who can go up and get a ball AND run by somebody AND knows he’s a wide receiver. I think there will be quality right tackles in the second round, i.e. Loadholt, Tupou, Boone, maybe Britton, and plenty of quality guards and centers. But to be honest I would be happy with a lot of picks but not Harvin. He’s gonna have a rude awakening when he realizes every ones just as fast as he is in the NFL.

by Hurricanes becoming Bears on Feb 6, 2009 8:15 PM CST up reply actions  

If the Bears did select a WR with the 1st round pick

I definitely agree with you; Heyward-Bey is the receiver to go after.

If Oher or any of the elite OT’s fall to us, I think we have to go after him. I doubt one of them would fall to us, but one can hope….

I'M A MAN! I'M 22!

by ChiFan13 on Feb 6, 2009 8:34 PM CST up reply actions  

adding Harvin would be an upgrade

but and upgrade to what? Two really fast guys who Orton can’t get the ball to?

Get a big, possession receiver with a long wing span. That is what Orton needs.

Being Who You Thought We Were Since 2005!

by Adam T on Feb 6, 2009 11:42 PM CST up reply actions  

How does Robinson not "wow" you...

What OG does “wow” you anytime. I mean he only opened up holes for two 1000 yard rushers, they ran behind him pretty much the entire year. He also is good in pass protection, seenhow he was the leader of the line that was the NCAA equivalent of the 2007 Patriots line, giving Bradford all day in the pocket.

by chase17 on Feb 6, 2009 9:36 PM CST up reply actions  

That is why

you get paid the big bu…oh wait.

Being Who You Thought We Were Since 2005!

by Adam T on Feb 7, 2009 12:09 PM CST up reply actions  

What...

I watched every Oklahoma game this year, I could probably count the number of penalties he got called for on one hand. It was Phil Loadholt the LT that got called for about 3 penalties a game.

by chase17 on Feb 6, 2009 9:29 PM CST up reply actions  

I know that can't be true

because he had, what, three penalties in the NC? So you’re saying he only had one other penalty prior to that?

I'M A MAN! I'M 22!

by ChiFan13 on Feb 6, 2009 9:33 PM CST up reply actions  

3+1=4,

And if i am not mistaking you have 5 fingers on a hand.

To get to the point I was over-exagerating on the fewness of penalties called against him. But I don’t think you can call Robinson, “Mr. Yellow Flag,” when I don’t remember him getting an excessive amount of penalties called against him for the past two seasons. If you are calling Robinson that I have to assume you don’t watch as much college football as you say, because he only had that bad game in the NC all year. And one of those penalties was crap, he got hit by a D-Lineman after the whistle and then knocked him on his ass, and got called for that. Retaliation is bad, but wouldn’t you want someone who brings intensity and ferocity back to a Bears O-Line that lacked any of it last year. Kreutz was our last O-Lineman to play like that and he was a beast until he calmed down, maybe Robinson could re-ignite Kreutz fire by rubbing some intensity off on him. Which is what a good run-blocking O-Line needs, did you not see the NY Giants O-Line knocking people around last year, that is in my opinion what Robinson brings, and is why I want they Bears to draft him at 18.

by chase17 on Feb 6, 2009 9:49 PM CST up reply actions  

Alright
If you are calling Robinson that I have to assume you don’t watch as much college football as you say, because he only had that bad game in the NC all year.

Saw blOU a lot this year…yes, he wasn’t overly penalized, but he wasn’t an angel on the field either.

And one of those penalties was crap, he got hit by a D-Lineman after the whistle and then knocked him on his ass, and got called for that

Don’t care, stupid penalty regardless of who it is. I’ve said it before when my Horns have done it.

Which is what a good run-blocking O-Line needs, did you not see the NY Giants O-Line knocking people around last year, that is in my opinion what Robinson brings, and is why I want they Bears to draft him at 18.

Ok, this is the part that makes me laugh. You say that I must not watch as much college football as I say I do, yet you want us to draft Robinson at #18? Good God dude….that’s a huge reach. If you truly believe that, you are a complete homer.

I'M A MAN! I'M 22!

by ChiFan13 on Feb 6, 2009 9:55 PM CST up reply actions  

How...

Most people have him in the early 20s, 5 or so spots is not a reach.

I would fully endorse trading down in the first round to get him, but I don’t think Angelo will be able to trade down because there really isn’t anybody intensely good around at that spot. The only possibility of this happening is if the Vikings are afraid that the Bucs will draft Freeman, which a lot of people have them doing, so they trade up to steal him because they are tired of Jackson.

Since, Oher is most likely not going to be around at 18 who do you want the Bears to get, if he is not there? You seem to have a fine time bashing everyone elses ideas, but in my opinion in this draft class everyone available at 18 in a position of need is a reach so you go with someone who helps your team the most and since all the elite tackles will be gone by then and Robinson is by far the best guard available, Herman Johnson at #2, but everyone I have read says that he got dominated in the Senior Bowl.

I am a homer for OU, despite the fact that I don’t live there, but if you look at the history of Oklahoma guards under Stoops, they usually do good in the NFL.

by chase17 on Feb 6, 2009 10:11 PM CST up reply actions  

I somehow skipped this but...

I feel that an upgraded O-Line will help the Bears more than any other position, especially since they are a running team and seem to have found a running back.

by chase17 on Feb 6, 2009 10:19 PM CST up reply actions  

Ok,

not to be a dick or anything, but could you link some of those? Because most have him not being drafted in the 1st round.

About the Vikings….I really hope they do draft Freeman, because he’s not worth a 1st round pick. The QB shortage is really bumping up the lesser players (Freeman and Sanchez). If they don’t go QB, they need a C to replace Matt Birk.

If Oher isn’t available at #18 along with any of the elite OT’s, then I would be more inclined to do one of two things: trade down (like you said) or draft Heyward-Bey. If we trade down, then yes, get Robinson. Otherwise, he’s not worth a #18 selection. I totally agree on your OL point; I’d love to get some more good prospects on the Bears. I just want to get value out of the picks.

I'M A MAN! I'M 22!

by ChiFan13 on Feb 6, 2009 10:20 PM CST up reply actions  

Nevermind,

They linked for me, did not know that happened

by chase17 on Feb 6, 2009 10:31 PM CST up reply actions  

Well, just so you know

when you hit reply to someone, it’s the second button from the right. Then just paste the links and you can imbed them in your text if you wish. (sorry about the pic, I had to)

We must have been looking at different drafts, because more than a few showed Robinson out of the first and in the second. Again, even my mock draft is completely useless at this point. The combine and each prospect’s school workouts will tell us more. Maybe Robinson will shoot up. Right now I don’t believe he’s worth an #18 slot. To me, he’s on the fringe of 1st and 2nd round.

But then again, that’s what makes all of this beautiful: we all look like idiots on draft day :)

I'M A MAN! I'M 22!

by ChiFan13 on Feb 6, 2009 10:44 PM CST up reply actions  

I just Google "2009 NFL mock drafts"...

not very creative, I know.

I agree that we will all look like idiots on draft day, especially when we are talking about the Bears.

by chase17 on Feb 6, 2009 10:51 PM CST up reply actions  

you might wanna try this

i totally did the google search forever. try this nfl mocks, easy way to keep track of them and not read a draft that hasn’t been updated in a month ten times. its not getting updated every day right now but usually gets alot better closer to the draft

http://nflmocks.com/nfl-mock-draft-database/

by Hurricanes becoming Bears on Feb 7, 2009 3:27 PM CST up reply actions  

wake up

oher will not be at 18, the bears will not trade down and they will not draft Heyward-Bey. thank you try again…

by No It All on Feb 6, 2009 10:48 PM CST up reply actions  

Oh, that's right

we’re going to draft a worse WR. Works for me.

I'M A MAN! I'M 22!

by ChiFan13 on Feb 6, 2009 10:55 PM CST up reply actions  

He might be blunt

about it, but he’s probably right. How many times since Angelo started drafting has he drafted anyone the fans wanted? Once, in Greg Olsen. Otherwise, he trades down, or takes someone not on our collective radar. Most of the time he’d be better off listening to the fans, though in some cases (like when most fans wanted Mike Williams over Benson), the fans were wrong too.

DEJESUS!!!

by tomas21 on Feb 7, 2009 5:44 PM CST up reply actions  

What?

Angelo didn’t draft down for Olsen…..

And regardless, Angelo won’t draft Harvin.

I'M A MAN! I'M 22!

by ChiFan13 on Feb 7, 2009 5:52 PM CST up reply actions  

I didn't

say he “drafted down” for Olsen, whatever that means.

DEJESUS!!!

by tomas21 on Feb 8, 2009 6:31 PM CST up reply actions  

oher to the bears is the biggest reach so far...

talk about a homer pick from imagination land. and all you gotta say is that you hope he falls…

by No It All on Feb 6, 2009 10:46 PM CST up reply actions  

And speaking of homer things

Could you try really hard and NOT pick someone from Florida? I mean, I love the Longhorns, chase loves Oklahoma, and GeauxBears loves LSU; we’re still not delusional.

I'M A MAN! I'M 22!

by ChiFan13 on Feb 6, 2009 11:01 PM CST up reply actions  

Witht the eighteenth pick in the 2009 NFL Draft the Chicago Bears select...

JIMMMYYYY CLLAUUSSSEENNN!!!

If John Paxson were a Greek hero he would be known as Sans Testicles

by wennington4 on Feb 8, 2009 10:52 PM CST up reply actions  

SLB

The strong side backer in the cover-2 scheme is meant to take the lead block and allow the others to flow to the ball. Hence hillenmeyer not having a whole lot of tackles. the problem with hillenmeyer is his inability in pass coverage because his first step is always forward. the right step but he lacks makeup speed to recover from that.

I dont believe that SLB is a first day problem… if you find someone like harrison was a good player with issues ( Character issues or whatever) then maybe worth a fourth or fifth round

by scespy12 on Feb 7, 2009 5:59 PM CST up reply actions  

here are my problems

- Knowshon would be a huge reach at #5, especially considering they need help on defense. They could probably get better value at RB later on in the draft.

- there’s no way the Packers should even think about drafting outside of d-line and LB in the first a) they have no true OLB pass rusher and b) they pretty much only have three players that could be true a 3-4 fit. Brown, Maybin or Tyson Jackson would all be better fits (besides, a secondary of Tramon, Woodson, Collins and Rouse isn’t too shabby either)

- Pettigrew to the Bills has been so overplayed that I have a feeling they’ll probably just end up picking someone else to fix one of their needs (ie: Bears and Leonard Pope a few years ago)

- do the Chargers really need another 3-4 pass rusher when they already have Phillips and Merrimen?

- Wells would be a fine pick for the Bucs, but I don’t see RB as one of their biggest needs at all

- the Falcons have absolutely no need for a WR, especially this high in the draft. they’d be much better off reaching for LB or a CB

- Do the Colts really even need a RB?

- the Eagles have spent three first day picks in the past few years on DT (Patterson, Bunkley, Laws), do they really need another one?

- unless the Giants plan on moving to a 3-4 scheme to move him to OLB, i don’t see any reason to take Johnson. they have a ton of depth on the d-line and have needs at other positions that they could better address with that pick

That’s pretty much it.

I am like your Dan Aykroyd and biglow would be Jane, the ignorant slut. -Chad

by thecoolest on Feb 6, 2009 7:22 PM CST reply actions  

Here's my logic behind the madness

1) Yes, Moreno’s a reach at this point. But if he impresses at the combine (which I believe he will), #5 could be an OK spot to draft him.

2) Jenkins wouldn’t be a bad fit. If they don’t select Jenkins, however, they better find a way to get Orakpo. Maybin and especially Jackson would be huge reaches so early in the draft.

3) Pettigrew….I found that same pattern too, but they need a TE.

4) Maualuga would go well with the Chargers too. Maybin…yeah, I see your point.

5) I heard some rumblings at the end of last season about Roddy White. I picked Nicks because of the uncertainty it seemed like they had with him.

6) If they want DL, Johnson would work. Otherwise McCoy’s falling off the chart.

7) Depends on how the Eagles feel about those choices.

8) That along with the Packers pick were the two “why in the *(&# did I put them there” once WCG posted it. I wholeheartedly agree with your assessment.

I'M A MAN! I'M 22!

by ChiFan13 on Feb 6, 2009 7:38 PM CST up reply actions  

Here is the problem with mock drafts

they don’t take into consideration drafting philosophies. You say there is no way ATL takes a receiver that high. The Lions did. If the GM is a best athlete guy or like Al Davis and always wants the big name supposed play maker they might.

Without knowing who is pulling the strings in the war rooms and how they draft, you cannot say a team won’t draft a spot.

Being Who You Thought We Were Since 2005!

by Adam T on Feb 6, 2009 11:47 PM CST up reply actions  

Just one switch

I do think you have to switch the Colts and Eagles picks. It’s an easy fix and everybodies needs get addressed. Colts need a DT, Eagles need a RB of the future. Persoanlly though I tries to put together a mock last year, and it is alot tougher than you think. And as soon as you get it done, it needs to be updated. Thats why I read other peoples.

by Hurricanes becoming Bears on Feb 6, 2009 8:19 PM CST reply actions  

hahaha

It was real easy for me to read Mel Kiper’s mock draft and scoff at his picks until I did mine. Unfortunately, I know WCG will want me to continue to put up mock drafts.

I agree with what you said about the Eagles and Colts. I’ll make sure to make those changes next time.

I'M A MAN! I'M 22!

by ChiFan13 on Feb 6, 2009 8:43 PM CST up reply actions  

yes

I tried to do it, but I always manage to leave somebody who should be in the top 10 out. Then I have to go back and redo it only to leave another guy out who should be in the 1st round. I’ll let Chifan deal with that.

Being Who You Thought We Were Since 2005!

by Adam T on Feb 6, 2009 11:49 PM CST up reply actions  

The golden rule

you can never have enough linebackers.

by ifuwannacrownem on Feb 6, 2009 11:33 PM CST reply actions  

Amen

Even if they don’t need to start right away, good LB play is huge for the Bears, and Urlacher is declining. I am not sold on Nick Roach, but I’m not ready to spend a first round pick on what is not a huge concern at this point.That being said, Brian Cushing would add some much needed intimidation to the D, even though what it needs is a pass rush that doesn’t rely on blitzing all 3 LB’s.

by isrealidonije on Feb 7, 2009 10:48 PM CST up reply actions  

Oher discrepency

If any one has read Blind Side, which I suggest, they build the physical traits of Oher up to an unbelievable scale, yet some scouting reports have questioned his athleticism (not his strength). Personally, I would be fine with them drafting him if he was available, but I am not convinced that they need another LT prospect. I know that the tackles are relatively interchangeable, but I would rather have them draft a RT in the Jeff Otah mold, like Phil Loadholt, later on. I don’t really know what to think about Beekman, except that he could possibly replace Kreutz at center later on. For a team like the Bears that wants to run the ball, they should draft size, which is why I did not like the CW pick last year.

by isrealidonije on Feb 7, 2009 10:45 PM CST reply actions  

Forgot to mention

Herman Johnson. Who cares if he can’t move his feet that well or if guard is not a huge need? The Bears resident Cajun RB needs the biggest baby ever born in the state of LA to be opening holes, and at 6-7.5 380, Johnson would do just that.

by isrealidonije on Feb 7, 2009 10:50 PM CST up reply actions  

No defense in the 1st

With the coaching changes made it’s time for our over paid guys to step up and earn their money. We have spent more on the D than the O. If they don’t get rid of them or take a pay cut. Our most glaring need is WR. If Maclin is gone I like Nicks more than Bey because he has better hands. In the second get Phil Loadholt 6’8" 343# for RT and move Metcalf back inside. In the third go D with Jarius Byrd. He is considered the best cover 2 back on the board. We might get a second pick in the third for the loss of Berrian and that would be a good time to get some help for Forte. Rashad Jennings 6’1" 235# and likes to run over tacklers. Great for short yardage.

by luckie815 on Feb 8, 2009 9:31 AM CST reply actions  

Do you mean St. Clair?

I didn’t think that Metcalf was ever officially moved to tackle. His problem is that he is a 30-something rookie, essentially, as he has never gotten great playing time. In another connection to “Blind Side,” they mention how Oher is the best high school O-Lineman since Terrance, which was interesting. I wonder if he still has potential.

by isrealidonije on Feb 8, 2009 7:47 PM CST up reply actions  

Your Right

I meant St. Clair. They should also resign Tait because he can back up the L or R position.

by luckie815 on Feb 9, 2009 4:40 AM CST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Windy City Gridiron is the best independent site on the internet for breaking news, in-depth analysis, and hardcore discussion about the Chicago Bears

Community Guidelines

Managers

Windycity_small Adam T

189886_210123485665309_100000029768895_888721_5830650_n__1__small Dane Noble

Editors

Sackwatchcutler_small Lester A. Wiltfong Jr.

Orange_shy_guy_small Steven Schweickert

Capture_small Kev H

Contributing Writers

Lincoln_small Sam Householder

Leprechaun_small Spongie

Polishsausage_small Steve Ronkowski

Cat_bonnet_small Pete Dixon

Icothgmts_small T.J. Shouse