Assessing the First Mini-camp
As you all know, the Bears already held their first mini-camp this past week. It was an unusual time to schedule, as most teams wait till after the draft, but it helped the Bears get a jump start on the season. They've forced their players to start preparing earlier and stay in shape. They let new coaches become familiar with the roster to start forming some chemistry, and it gave management a chance to re-evalute talent prior to the draft.
The re-evaluation of the roster was perhaps the most significant part of the mini-camp, as the Bears will be relying very heavily on this years draft to find immediate starters at several positions.
So, what did we learn about this team after the mini-camp?
1. Offensive line is a major work in progress
New acqusition Frank Omiyale started the mini-camp lined up at LG with the 1st team. When the Bears signed Omiyale, Jerry Angelo said they, "wanted to look at him at guard first."
However, after John St. Clair signed with the Browns this week, Omiyale quickly moved from LG to RT, and Josh Beekman returned to his 1st team spot at LG.
Beekman started all 16 games last year at LG, but I wasn't sold him. Apparently, neither were the Bears, as they are trying to provide serious competition for him at LG.
On the other side, incumbent starter, Roberto Garza, will compete with Dan Buenning at RG. Buenning also lined up as backup Center, when Omiyale shifted to RT, and Beekman resumed his spot at LG. Last year's #1 pick, Chris Williams, will man the LT... whether he's ready or not.
Draft take: It's no secret that the Bears will likely be focusing on RT with one of their top picks. But, don't be surprised if they draft a guard on the first day as well to compete at both spots.
2. Searching for safeties under every rock.
The depth chart is set... but it's certainly not in stone. Kevin Payne and Craig Steltz appear to be the starters at safety.... for now. Of the two, it looks like Payne's job is more secure. After saying good-bye to Mike Brown and Brandon McGowan, and ending the Danieal Manning experiment... the Bears are looking everywhere for replacements.
They signed former Saints starter, Josh Bullocks.... asked last year's 5th round pick Zack Bowman to switch positions... and invited former Texan, Glenn Earl, to mini-camp on a try-out basis, and signed him afterward.
That fact that they're trying so hard to resolve the issues at this position is an alarming sign that the talent level is unacceptable.
Draft take: FS is among the top draft priorities for a team that runs the Cover 2, and it should be addressed very early in a weak draft class.
3. Devin Hester and Earl Bennett will likely be next year's top 2 WRs
The Bears propaganda machine is at it again... last year they spread the word that Earl Bennett was having a very impressive training-camp. Now, this year, they're telling us he's having a nice mini-camp, and Bennett admitted himself, that he struggled last year with the playbook.
With the Bears passiveness on the free agent market, and Jerry Angelo's attitude that the QB play is more important than the WRs... it seems Hester and Bennett will have to make big contributions.
The Bears are still trying to replace the production of Bernard Berrian and Mushin Muhammad, as last year's replacements, Marty Booker and Brandon Lloyd, will not be back for a second season. With very little experience on the roster at WR outside of slot man Rashied Davis, it's hard to imagine where the production is going to come from.
The rest of the depth chart is currently filled out by practice squadders Devin Aromashodu, John Broussard, and Brandon Rideau.
Draft take: WR has to be another high priority for the Bears. But, at this point... experience is just as important as talent. Jerry Angelo traditionally hasn't selected WRs in the first round (Reidel Anthony in '97 was the last one). But look for the Bears to select a WR on the first day, (possibly in the 3rd round where they might receive an extra comp pick for the free agent loss of Berrian). Also look for the Bears to sign a veteran after the post-draft roster cuts, as Angelo often refers to...
2 recs |
49 comments
Comments
If we sign a FA
tackle I would like them to consider Alex Mack. He could take Garza’s spot while waiting for Krutz to move on.
by luckie815 on Mar 22, 2009 1:32 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
so you'd find an FA tackle
and make him play guard?
i’m confused.
The shortest distance between two points is under construction.
by halfblindcubbiegirl on Mar 23, 2009 7:23 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ugh We Have Too Many needs
To take a game-changing receiver at 18 like DHB or Maclin or Nicks. I understand G and T are very pressing needs but had we addressed them in FA then we could get an awesome WR in round 1.
by GallopingGhost on Mar 22, 2009 1:49 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
So awesome that he's not likely to make an impact.
WR is very tough position to make an impact right away, even for top picks. Crabtree is the only prospect capable of being at least average in his first year. I’d rather JA concentrate on RT with the first pick.
"I'm not so mean. I wouldn't ever go out to hurt anybody deliberately - unless it was, you know, important, like a league game or something." - Dick Butkus
by propheteer on Mar 22, 2009 10:21 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agree with both your points and GG's
Your first point, though, is vastly under-stated. Our OL is a federal disaster zone.
We do have too many needs and not enough draft picks. Even if we traded away our 1st round pick next year to grab someone else in the 1st, we would still need to pick the right players. And there is little hope for the last part.
I'M A MAN! I'M 22!
by ChiFan13 on Mar 22, 2009 2:25 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
The first Bennet link
is a year old. Bennet isn’t a rookie anymore, so that’s kind of misleading… Just sayin.
by DieHardBearsCubs on Mar 22, 2009 2:31 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Thanks... I edited the paragraph.
"You win because of the quarterback. We have to get that position stabilized. We're fixated on that.
We know it's the most valuable position on the football team. We've gone through so many scenarios at that position we can write a book, moreso on what not do."
-- Jerry Angelo (12.30.2008)
.
by SackMan on Mar 22, 2009 3:14 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
No Problem
Just trying to help out
by DieHardBearsCubs on Mar 22, 2009 4:37 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Great post as usual.
However the jury’s still out on Hester and Bennett. After Angelo told the media he’s looking for potential starting receivers, I can only hope he stays true to his word. I do believe we should spend a high pick on a guard rather than a tackle.
OH! STEWIE!! GET OUT THE WAY BOY! GET OUT THE WAY!
-Stacey King
by ifuwannacrownem on Mar 22, 2009 5:54 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Maybe.
The best guard in the draft in a second rounder though, and a late one at that according to numerous mock drafts.
by Sklz711 on Mar 22, 2009 6:08 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
yeah.
when i said high pick, I didn’t necessarily mean first round. i consider a third rounder a high pick.
OH! STEWIE!! GET OUT THE WAY BOY! GET OUT THE WAY!
-Stacey King
by ifuwannacrownem on Mar 22, 2009 6:30 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You know...
It’s getting to the point where I wouldn’t mind seeing Eben Britton in the first followed by Duke Robinson in the Second.
The more I hear about DHB and Nicks the more disappointed I am, and with the word being the Giants are going to pick up Britt at the end of the 1st.
I really like Loadholt, but what I hear about Britton is really good. Great RT, and could be LT if needed.
by Sklz711 on Mar 22, 2009 7:23 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
True
I’m starting to change my stance on drafting a WR in the first. I think the only way we’re going to have our rookies contribute for 2009 is if they’re linemen.
OH! STEWIE!! GET OUT THE WAY BOY! GET OUT THE WAY!
-Stacey King
by ifuwannacrownem on Mar 22, 2009 7:39 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Another point to mention
We don’t run a lot of three WR formations, so if Hester and Bennett actually contribute well this year our first round pick would likely only be used sparingly. Two TE is going to be seeing the field quite a bit.
With our TE/RB and if we pick up a new FB I just don’t see WR as such a huge need under the caveat of Hester continuing to develop, and Bennett being on the field and pulling down balls.
by Sklz711 on Mar 22, 2009 9:01 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I just can't trust Bennett
Nor Williams. i can’t see them being a solid starter if they couldn’t get on the field at all in 08
OH! STEWIE!! GET OUT THE WAY BOY! GET OUT THE WAY!
-Stacey King
by ifuwannacrownem on Mar 22, 2009 9:24 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Williams did get on the field.
Berrian was another 3rd round pick, and I don’t remember him being on the field at all his first season. He turned out pretty good.
by chase17 on Mar 23, 2009 6:35 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Never mention that man's name ever again.
he did make it onto the field his rookie season, and was also used as a kick returner. bennett however, nada.
OH! STEWIE!! GET OUT THE WAY BOY! GET OUT THE WAY!
-Stacey King
by ifuwannacrownem on Mar 23, 2009 7:28 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
If we actually select good players, instead of busts...
they’ll be able to contribute as starters right away at all of the positions discussed in this post.
"You win because of the quarterback. We have to get that position stabilized. We're fixated on that.
We know it's the most valuable position on the football team. We've gone through so many scenarios at that position we can write a book, moreso on what not do."
-- Jerry Angelo (12.30.2008)
.
by SackMan on Mar 22, 2009 9:19 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
A trade to move down in the 1st and pick up another 1st day pick
Is probably our best move. Then, we can address multiple needs.
We’re in a non-enviable situation: we need to find 3 immediate starters in this draft.
"You win because of the quarterback. We have to get that position stabilized. We're fixated on that.
We know it's the most valuable position on the football team. We've gone through so many scenarios at that position we can write a book, moreso on what not do."
-- Jerry Angelo (12.30.2008)
.
by SackMan on Mar 22, 2009 9:22 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree
This is the most likely scenario because there will be a run at tackle early in the draft, thus making the #18 pick low value for the Bears. JA loves to trade down and would position himself to get a good RT and G with his first two picks.
Problem solved- not only would he instantly revamp the Bears O-line, but it would be a very young, solid nucleus for years to come.
"I'm not so mean. I wouldn't ever go out to hurt anybody deliberately - unless it was, you know, important, like a league game or something." - Dick Butkus
by propheteer on Mar 22, 2009 10:27 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The Bears may even need 4 starters
OT, OG, WR, and FS could all use a talent infusion at the top. The Bears should have 4 picks in the first 3 rounds, and chances are one of them won’t be ready to be a starter. By trading down(or out) of the 1stround, we would greatly improve our odds. And if the Draft follows talent evaluation of ranked players, the Bears would get better value by trading down to pick up these positions.
by gillrowdy on Mar 22, 2009 11:31 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I love that draft,
Britton and Robinson in the first two rounds, that would give us a solid right side for the next 10 years. Plus we could move Omiyale back to LG. Giving us.
LT-Williams
LG-Omiyale
C-Kruetz
RG-Robinson
RT-Britton
I would be decently happy with that O-Line going into next season.
by chase17 on Mar 23, 2009 6:40 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
i like this
then possibly draft Brian Robiskie in the 3rd
by No It All on Mar 23, 2009 9:03 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think he will last until the 3rd.
Being Who You Thought We Were Since 2005!
by Adam T on Mar 23, 2009 9:11 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Barden
would be good in the 3rd. He would be great crossing the middle and in the red zone. At 6’6" 227# and 10 3/4" hands he would be Ortons favorite target.
by luckie815 on Mar 23, 2009 9:18 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I like Barden
that guy’s a thug.
OH! STEWIE!! GET OUT THE WAY BOY! GET OUT THE WAY!
-Stacey King
by ifuwannacrownem on Mar 23, 2009 9:20 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Weren't...
you the guy who called me a whippersnapper for saying that Dez Bryant was a thug.
by chase17 on Mar 23, 2009 3:13 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hehe
yeah. seemed like a good time to bring it back :)
OH! STEWIE!! GET OUT THE WAY BOY! GET OUT THE WAY!
-Stacey King
by ifuwannacrownem on Mar 23, 2009 5:19 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's cool...
I think Barden can be a thug also.
by chase17 on Mar 23, 2009 10:00 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why is everybody so down on Garza?
I keep hearing that his play was unsatisfying in 2008. i also heard that he was the Bears best lineman in 08 as well. I like the idea drafting a guard. if i had it my way guess what? Frank Omiyale would be LT and Chris Williams would be RT.
OH! STEWIE!! GET OUT THE WAY BOY! GET OUT THE WAY!
-Stacey King
by ifuwannacrownem on Mar 23, 2009 9:20 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Garza
just dosen’t get enough push for the running game. We need bigger bodies like Herman Johnson and Loadholt. Forte is probabley wishing for a right side like that.
by luckie815 on Mar 23, 2009 9:33 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
We're gonna need Garza's veteran presence next year...
But, we should be trying to develop a future replacement/upgrade.
"You win because of the quarterback. We have to get that position stabilized. We're fixated on that.
We know it's the most valuable position on the football team. We've gone through so many scenarios at that position we can write a book, moreso on what not do."
-- Jerry Angelo (12.30.2008)
.
by SackMan on Mar 23, 2009 10:51 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
More bulk/muscle at guard is needed...
to go against the “Williams’ wall.” I’m tired of seeing the middle of the Bears line get blown up by them in short yardage situations.
"I'm not so mean. I wouldn't ever go out to hurt anybody deliberately - unless it was, you know, important, like a league game or something." - Dick Butkus
by propheteer on Mar 23, 2009 11:06 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Exactly...
in the second game against the Vikings our O-Line got totally manhandled by the Vikings. You can’t expect any RB or QB to perform good in those circumstances.
by chase17 on Mar 23, 2009 3:16 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I want more bulk across the entire line.
I’m sick and tired of Lovie and Jerry proclaiming we’re a “running” team, when we don’t even have a line built to run the football.
You wanna run the ball? Then get some maulers up there. 4th and 1 won’t be a problem any longer.
"You win because of the quarterback. We have to get that position stabilized. We're fixated on that.
We know it's the most valuable position on the football team. We've gone through so many scenarios at that position we can write a book, moreso on what not do."
-- Jerry Angelo (12.30.2008)
.
by SackMan on Mar 23, 2009 5:03 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
+1
Exactly. Hard to move a pile with midgets doing the pushing.
what they you use lame AOL speak
by Dane Noble on Mar 23, 2009 5:04 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
B-b-b-ut
he was on the cover of Spanish Madden 09!
that obviously makes him a great player, him and brittfarr
by wennington4 on Mar 24, 2009 1:37 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thats 4 out of 5 OLinemen
LT-Williams
LG-Omiyale
C-Kruetz
RG-Robinson
RT-Britton
that have never started an NFL game at their position before!!!
Orton would soil himself walking up to the line for the first game with that group. I would guess thats the most inexperienced OL in the history of professional football.
by gillrowdy on Mar 24, 2009 9:26 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Great overview
Nice job sorting through the Bears’ off-season thus far.
But look for the Bears to select a WR on the first day, (possibly in the 3rd round where they might receive an extra comp pick for the free agent loss of Berrian).
Doesn’t the first day include just the first two rounds?
"I'm not so mean. I wouldn't ever go out to hurt anybody deliberately - unless it was, you know, important, like a league game or something." - Dick Butkus
by propheteer on Mar 22, 2009 10:34 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
1st three rounds
"You win because of the quarterback. We have to get that position stabilized. We're fixated on that.
We know it's the most valuable position on the football team. We've gone through so many scenarios at that position we can write a book, moreso on what not do."
-- Jerry Angelo (12.30.2008)
.
by SackMan on Mar 22, 2009 10:56 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
last year was the first year they changed it to 2 rounds
Maybe they changed it back, but I haven’t read anything confirming that. Not that it really matters; but as a draft watcher, I liked last years setup. It gives a little edge to seeing possible starters for your team selected on Day2.
by gillrowdy on Mar 22, 2009 11:14 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wow...I didn't even recall that they changed it.
"You win because of the quarterback. We have to get that position stabilized. We're fixated on that.
We know it's the most valuable position on the football team. We've gone through so many scenarios at that position we can write a book, moreso on what not do."
-- Jerry Angelo (12.30.2008)
.
by SackMan on Mar 23, 2009 5:13 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
It did make day 2 a little more interesting
The shortest distance between two points is under construction.
by halfblindcubbiegirl on Mar 23, 2009 7:25 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I totally forgot
I enjoyed last year’s draft a lot more than previous years because of it.
"I'm not so mean. I wouldn't ever go out to hurt anybody deliberately - unless it was, you know, important, like a league game or something." - Dick Butkus
by propheteer on Mar 23, 2009 11:07 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Everyone wants to forget the exploits of
David Terrell(2001)
Jerry Angelo traditionally hasn’t selected WRs in the first round (Reidel Anthony in ’97 was the last one).
Sorry, I didnt think that seemed right. I knew we had some other more recent first round receiver who sucked.
"Nobody who ever gave his best regretted it. "---George S. Halas
by Halas is God!!!!! on Mar 23, 2009 10:30 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Angelo didn't draft Terrell...
"You win because of the quarterback. We have to get that position stabilized. We're fixated on that.
We know it's the most valuable position on the football team. We've gone through so many scenarios at that position we can write a book, moreso on what not do."
-- Jerry Angelo (12.30.2008)
.
by SackMan on Mar 23, 2009 10:46 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hatley's last draft?
I think JA came in just after the draft took place.
This is interesting look at the Bears past drafts. Take a look at all the crappy drafts in the mid-late 90’s. Wannstedt blows!
http://www.nfl.com/draft/history/fulldraft?teamId=0810&type=team
"I'm not so mean. I wouldn't ever go out to hurt anybody deliberately - unless it was, you know, important, like a league game or something." - Dick Butkus
by propheteer on Mar 23, 2009 11:15 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah. Angelo came in after Hatley's draft... in June or early July.
What a stupid move by the MCs. Let someone run the draft, when you know he’s leaving and you’re gonna restructure the organization with a new GM.
"You win because of the quarterback. We have to get that position stabilized. We're fixated on that.
We know it's the most valuable position on the football team. We've gone through so many scenarios at that position we can write a book, moreso on what not do."
-- Jerry Angelo (12.30.2008)
.
by SackMan on Mar 23, 2009 5:01 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 

























