Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Dissecting Nick Diaz's Positive Drug Test

The Zone Blitz

Most typically seen out of a 3-4 defense the zone blitz is a pressure package that employs a zone coverage with a covered blitz. The most famous example of zone blitz base teams are the Steelers and the Chargers.

Come inside; let's learn more:

Star-divide

Defensive Backs:

The Defensive backs are utilizing a zone coverage, but unlike the Cover-2 we are all so familiar with, they are responsible for only the third of the field that they are on (i.e. the strong side corner is responsible for the strong side third of the field). The safeties split the middle of the field; one shallower and one as a true safety. They do not always employ bump and run tactics, that is at the discretion of the DC. They do this because they will most likely not have the safety help over the top.

Linebackers:

This is where the scheme gets tricky…. The linebackers are responsible for their own zone, the two outside backers the flats and the two inside backers split the middle. But the blitz package is such that the non-blitzing linebackers are required to fill the zone vacated by the blitzing backer. The safety then has to fill the remaining hole in the zone leaving the other safety with the deep middle of the field. From the 3-4 there is usually a designated linebacker for blitzing (Harrison on the Steelers and Merriman on the Chargers). That makes the blitz fairly predictable and teams will line up a chip against them.

Defensive Linemen:

Space Fillers; that is all that these guys are. They are there to force double teams, they will prototypically be big and strong. More than one lineman can handle by themselves, they are responsible for keeping O-lineman off the linebackers.

Against the run:

The zone blitz is fairly stout; the hoss D-lineman force double teams, which allows the linebackers to scrape and flow to the play. It also forces the SS into the box to assist the linebackers.

Against the pass:

This defense is marginal. The defense is focused on pressure created by the blitz but if the blitz is picked up effectively the zone has holes the most common is the fly pattern from the Z wideout combined with a out pattern by the slot receiver, the corner can only cover one the wideouts so if he steps up to the out pattern he gives up the fly, and if he stays with the fly he will give up the out pattern with a blocker next to him and almost no safety help.

Final thought:

I know that a lot of people are screaming to move to this type of defense because it is “sexy”, but we do not have the personnel to employ the switch over; the only players on our D that could handle it are Harris, Urlacher and Briggs. Harris moves to End and Briggs to middle and Urlacher over to rush linebacker. None of the others in our front seven have the necessary build to make the switch over.

Yes, we already do some sort of zone blitz from our base D. The difference is that we blitz from a Cover-2 man, which is the two deep safeties but man-to-man everywhere else. We also employ the zone blitz in nickel situations with Manning acting as the Rush linebacker.

Overall the zone blitz is useful provided you have the personnel (which the Bears don’t) but it is definitely not worth switching over unless we are long-term rebuilding

Poll
Is it worth the long transition to the 3-4 Zone Blitz?
YES!
50 votes
Absolutely not!
64 votes
Only if or when Lovie gets fired.
72 votes

186 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 50 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Thanks....

I like being on the front page!

by scespy12 on Mar 3, 2009 11:39 AM CST reply actions  

Good post!

I think the Bears LBs don’t have the right skill set to succeed on the outside, but I don’t believe it has anything to do with their size (maybe a tad undersized).

"I'm not so mean. I wouldn't ever go out to hurt anybody deliberately - unless it was, you know, important, like a league game or something." - Dick Butkus

by propheteer on Mar 3, 2009 11:44 AM CST reply actions  

Great post...

thanks scep!

But as SackMan would say, No thanks… next subject.

Things will get better as they improve...

by Dane Noble on Mar 3, 2009 12:10 PM CST reply actions  

Next topic... LOL.

Cool discussion, but we have a system in place. That system isn’t going to drastically change… unless the people in charge are gone.

"You win because of the quarterback. We have to get that position stabilized. We're fixated on that.

We know it's the most valuable position on the football team. We've gone through so many scenarios at that position we can write a book, moreso on what not do."

-- Jerry Angelo (12.30.2008)
.

by SackMan on Mar 3, 2009 5:10 PM CST up reply actions  

I hate conformity

So no thank you

OH! STEWIE!! GET OUT THE WAY BOY! GET OUT THE WAY!
-Stacey King

by ifuwannacrownem on Mar 3, 2009 12:16 PM CST reply actions  

Picture?

Anyone find a picture for this?

by scespy12 on Mar 3, 2009 12:24 PM CST reply actions  

I found a bunch of pics that other sites used to go over similar topics.

I didn’t want to rip them, so unless somebody creates on on their own, it will probably on its own.

Being Who You Thought We Were Since 2005!

by Adam T on Mar 3, 2009 1:07 PM CST up reply actions  

I thought in a zone blitz...

The defensive lineman often drop back in cover, and more linebackers are sent on a blitz. Or is that a team-specific (Pittsburgh?) wrinkle?

by TCBullfrog on Mar 3, 2009 12:26 PM CST reply actions  

Not that uncommon

But yes it is a almost pittsburgh wrinkle.

they will occasionally do that to confuse the offense but it is not a pat of the base D

by scespy12 on Mar 3, 2009 12:43 PM CST up reply actions  

mark anderson

i don’t now why, but when they drafted him i felt like he was a guy that could play down or stand up off the line. if the odds were overcame and this got employed, or he went somewhere else, i would be curious to see what he could do.

by mike b on Mar 3, 2009 12:34 PM CST reply actions  

I am interested in seeing what

Marinelli is able to do with the guy. Anderson isn’t the most versitile player around, but he also isn’t the most restricted.

Gawd… the word “potential” can be thrown around Soldier Field all too often…

Things will get better as they improve...

by Dane Noble on Mar 3, 2009 12:36 PM CST up reply actions  

that word and "Special"

OH! STEWIE!! GET OUT THE WAY BOY! GET OUT THE WAY!
-Stacey King

by ifuwannacrownem on Mar 3, 2009 12:39 PM CST up reply actions  

Ah, but if we didn't see potential...

…then we wouldn’t think to move defensive backs to wide receiver, would we?

facepalm

by Spongie on Mar 3, 2009 8:18 PM CST up reply actions  

The Bears and Redskins

Are the only NFL teams to have never used a base 3-4 defense. That shouldn’t change until we get a new coach and need to rebuild.

by Sam Householder on Mar 3, 2009 12:44 PM CST reply actions  

Bring back

the 46. :)

If things came easy, then everybody would be great at what they did, let's face it.
Mike Ditka
Catch Phrase of the day: YAAAAAAAY! <---- Courtesy of ChiFan13.

by Ditkavsworld on Mar 3, 2009 12:48 PM CST reply actions  

*Golfclap...

Was thinking it, but wasn’t brave enough to post it.

Good on you, sir….

Things will get better as they improve...

by Dane Noble on Mar 3, 2009 12:51 PM CST up reply actions  

If you want it I got it!

Give me a week and you’ll see your 46

by scespy12 on Mar 3, 2009 12:52 PM CST up reply actions  

For the purpose of your posts...

It’s best to stick with viable scenarios for the Bears. But… for nostalgic purposes, hey it’s the offseason… why not??

Things will get better as they improve...

by Dane Noble on Mar 3, 2009 12:55 PM CST up reply actions  

Looking forward

to the indepth post on the 46, I know it’s not really realistic but I just love the D.

If things came easy, then everybody would be great at what they did, let's face it.
Mike Ditka
Catch Phrase of the day: YAAAAAAAY! <---- Courtesy of ChiFan13.

by Ditkavsworld on Mar 3, 2009 12:58 PM CST up reply actions  

Yeah a little out of date...

Although i have seen the ryan brothers use it recently….

Go figure!

by scespy12 on Mar 3, 2009 1:42 PM CST up reply actions  

Titans

Jeff Fisher also sometimes, but very rarely now, runs a few 46 plays on the Titans. Considering who his mentor was, no big surprise.

by scy3000 on Mar 3, 2009 2:41 PM CST up reply actions  

Jeff Fisher

Yeah I was about to mention that.

by scespy12 on Mar 3, 2009 3:04 PM CST up reply actions  

Yeah, because Lord knows we should forever live in history as Chicago Bear fans

The 4-6 is extinct. For very good reason. If you dont’ believe me, then go ask Rex Ryan in New York who happens to be son of Buddy Ryan. Or Jeff Fisher in Tennessee who was once a big proponent of and ran the 4-6.

by BLou on Mar 3, 2009 2:22 PM CST up reply actions  

The 4-6 is extinct

Not true. the base scheme may be obsolete, but many teams run various formations of it Used for key third down situations and on plays most likely to stop the run.

OH! STEWIE!! GET OUT THE WAY BOY! GET OUT THE WAY!
-Stacey King

by ifuwannacrownem on Mar 3, 2009 2:29 PM CST up reply actions  

Dont know about third downs

Most third downs are passing downs in todays NFL and I only know of one team that repeatedly runs a full back dive on third down.

I could see it on a first with a short field though. Which is were the ravens employ it most often.

by scespy12 on Mar 3, 2009 3:06 PM CST up reply actions   1 recs

A gem!

“I only know of one team that repeatedly runs a full back dive on third down.”

+1 to you, good sir.

by Spongie on Mar 3, 2009 8:20 PM CST up reply actions  

I don't remember

getting up this moring and pissing in your cheerios. If there is no history there is no present or future. So if I want to talk about a scheme I liked back when it was used I’m allowed. I seem to recall that the wildcat was used this season I’m pretty sure that was extinct not so long ago. By the way I don’t have Rex Ryan’s number in New York so if you could get it to me I’d like to give him a call.

If things came easy, then everybody would be great at what they did, let's face it.
Mike Ditka
Catch Phrase of the day: YAAAAAAAY! <---- Courtesy of ChiFan13.

by Ditkavsworld on Mar 3, 2009 3:00 PM CST up reply actions  

No it doesn't

but hey at least you caught it before someone else.

If things came easy, then everybody would be great at what they did, let's face it.
Mike Ditka
Catch Phrase of the day: YAAAAAAAY! <---- Courtesy of ChiFan13.

by Ditkavsworld on Mar 3, 2009 1:00 PM CST up reply actions  

Lmao...

That was awesome…

Things will get better as they improve...

by Dane Noble on Mar 3, 2009 1:00 PM CST up reply actions  

If you ever compile a “greatest ever WCG user comments” post, those two by escolio have got to be on it.

by Spongie on Mar 3, 2009 8:23 PM CST up reply actions  

That's a good idea...

Start digging around, see what you can come up with, and let me know. I’d be all for it! :)

Things will get better as they improve...

by Dane Noble on Mar 3, 2009 8:26 PM CST up reply actions  

Does that make me

retarded because I understood it?

by McRipper on Mar 3, 2009 1:12 PM CST up reply actions  

Williams Wall = the Vikings’ pro bowl DE duo.

by Spongie on Mar 3, 2009 8:22 PM CST up reply actions  

D'oh

It makes me retarded because I mentally inserted a “don’t” into what you said.

by Spongie on Mar 3, 2009 8:34 PM CST up reply actions  

Hahahaha

this just keeps getting better… :)

Things will get better as they improve...

by Dane Noble on Mar 3, 2009 9:35 PM CST up reply actions  

not mutually exclusive

i don’t see why the Bears can’t throw in a 3-4 D when it suits their needs or even just to confuse the opposing offense. Only playing the 4-3 makes a D predictable. It’s not like a defensive scheme will get jealous if you switch to a 3-4 for a series just to give a different look. this would take a dash of ingenuity which has long been absent from the bears play calling. maybe with lovie calling the plays we will see new or different looks maximizing our defensive talent. one thing i did like about last year was the frequent blitzing.

by No It All on Mar 3, 2009 1:07 PM CST reply actions  

It's because Lovie is too stubborn

He has such a grand, steadfast belief that his philosophy should work in every situation. It’s obvious the defense sometimes suffers from predictability on third downs.

"I'm not so mean. I wouldn't ever go out to hurt anybody deliberately - unless it was, you know, important, like a league game or something." - Dick Butkus

by propheteer on Mar 3, 2009 1:13 PM CST up reply actions  

in both the military and football

the ability to adapt to situations and adjust accordingly is imperative. in this case lovie need not even devise a new strategy, but only to occasionally implement a proven one. if our coach refuses to do so solely out of “loyalty” to the 4-3 defensive scheme we in trouble, as it’s only a matter of time before decent qbs pick us apart.

by No It All on Mar 3, 2009 1:22 PM CST up reply actions  

The team doesn't have the personnel to employ the 3--4

There’s nothing wrong with Lovie’s defensive philosophy. Smaller, attacking defensive linemen in front of speedy, ball hawking backers and defensive backs have been the basis for some of the most impressive defensive units in NFL history including the Steel Curtain and Dungy’s Bucs. Like any defensive system, it’s only as good as the players who are on the field. The last couple seasons, the defensive line has fallen dramatically from where it was pre Super Bowl run and hasn’t produced the constant penetration necessary to disrupt both the run and pass. If Lovie, Jerry, and Rod can find a way to fix that, this team will be back to the top of the defensive rankings.

We have every right to dream heroic dreams. Those who say that we're in a time when there are no heroes, they just don't know where to look.
Ronald Reagan

by snley on Mar 3, 2009 5:03 PM CST up reply actions  

The Cover-2/4-3 is dying a slow death. . .

With Dungy’s retirement, Monte Kiffin leaving for UTenn, & the Bucs blowing up their defense, the message is clear: The Cover-2 is losing its effectiveness. Case in point: look at the last 2 NFC reps to reach the SuperBowl – Cards/Giants. The Cardinals playoff surge was mostly credited to Larry Fitzgerald & the super powers his ever flowing dreadlocks provided him. What people continue to overlook is the changes they made defensively. They basically switched to a hybrid defense, employing variations of 3-4 blitz schemes. The 2008 SuperBowl was also a great example. The Giants D-Linemen’s ability to play in space, & the precise pass rushing abilities of the LB core rocked the foundations of NFL history. Seriously, go back & relive the 2007 from the Pats point of view. I’m sure they tasted 19-0. That is until they were outschemed on the defensive side of the ball in the game that mattered the most. . .

with all that being said, the Bears would do themselves a huge favor by tapping into the natural nastiness of both Brian Urlacher & Lance Briggs & set them lose on opposing QBs

by ChiCity85 on Mar 3, 2009 1:42 PM CST reply actions  

I'm not ready to give up on the cover 2 just yet.

Well see what happens this season.

Passion For The Game, Loyal To The Name, Chicago Bears, I Trust In Thee, Standing Strong Since 1983.

by Haightminow on Mar 3, 2009 1:49 PM CST reply actions  

This is pointless discussion

Bears are committed to running the Cover-2 so long as Lovie Smith is head coach. Therefore this poll has no value other than inciting anti-Lovie sentiment.

The PROBLEM with the Bear defense isn’t so much the scheme (though I am not a big fan of the Cover-2) in that it is about the declining talent level on defense. Bears rank as a below average defense for a reason, and that reason is because Tommie Harris vaporized, the defensive line can’t get the job done, Brian Urlacher is in signficant decline phase, and the secondary is one big fat question mark once you get past Peanut Tillman. THAT’S the problem folks.

by BLou on Mar 3, 2009 2:20 PM CST reply actions  

Yikes

I think this was more of an informative post for those who don’t know.

I'M A MAN! I'M 22!

by ChiFan13 on Mar 3, 2009 2:41 PM CST up reply actions  

100% in agreement

I think Marinelli will help quite a bit. While these players you mentioned are declining and/or injured, they should improve with a little more coaching/motivation and less coddling.

"I'm not so mean. I wouldn't ever go out to hurt anybody deliberately - unless it was, you know, important, like a league game or something." - Dick Butkus

by propheteer on Mar 3, 2009 4:51 PM CST up reply actions  

with hiring marinelli to coach the line the bears are def committed to tampa 2

they seem to think that since they now have a tampa 2 expert that the d-line will start supplying the qb pressure needed for any tampa 2 system to work

by SamuraiMike50 on Mar 3, 2009 2:37 PM CST reply actions  

That's the thing

Just about every defense is predicated on the line getting pressure on the QB. No team wants to blitz with their LBs or safeties, exposing themselves to the big play.

"I'm not so mean. I wouldn't ever go out to hurt anybody deliberately - unless it was, you know, important, like a league game or something." - Dick Butkus

by propheteer on Mar 3, 2009 4:44 PM CST up reply actions  

Oops!

I’m sorry, I meant every 4-3 defense is predicated on getting pressure with the front four.

"I'm not so mean. I wouldn't ever go out to hurt anybody deliberately - unless it was, you know, important, like a league game or something." - Dick Butkus

by propheteer on Mar 3, 2009 5:05 PM CST up reply actions  

Nice post

Especially the evaluation of strengths and weaknesses. Looking forward to more.

by Spongie on Mar 3, 2009 8:37 PM CST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Windy City Gridiron is the best independent site on the internet for breaking news, in-depth analysis, and hardcore discussion about the Chicago Bears

Community Guidelines

Managers

Windycity_small Adam T

189886_210123485665309_100000029768895_888721_5830650_n__1__small Dane Noble

Editors

Sackwatchcutler_small Lester A. Wiltfong Jr.

Orange_shy_guy_small Steven Schweickert

Capture_small Kev H

Contributing Writers

Lincoln_small Sam Householder

Leprechaun_small Spongie

Polishsausage_small Steve Ronkowski

Cat_bonnet_small Pete Dixon

Icothgmts_small T.J. Shouse