Windy City Gridiron: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Spencer Hall's Sports Meme Power Rankings

Darren Sharper On His Way To Chicago

 

Sharper_medium 

 After a meeting in which both parties say they remain "very interested" S Darren Sharper has left New Orleans without a contract in place.  One source says that  Sharper is on his way to Chicago.

Firstly, we have to get past the "if they were going to give a contract to an old and sometimes broke down safety, why not just resign Brown?"  That ship has sailed.  This is a very Jerry Angelo move.  Bring in the older experienced guy for 2-3 years.

Is it just me or does this move seem like it was going to happen all along?  It is almost like Sharper has already decided that he wants to play in Chicago, so he visits a few other teams to try to leverage the best possible deal.  Now he goes to Halas Hall and all the Bears have to do is not low ball him.  I mean, who else are the Bears going to spend all their free agent money on?

Now the only thing we have to worry about is that he leaves us after 2 years, so he can sign with Detroit and finish his career Grand Slam of NFC North teams before he retires.

0 recs  |  Comment 42 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

it angers me that this is the most exciting thing we have to talk about

(no disrespect to Frank the tank Omiyale)

i can’t stand this gm any longer, we need a gm who will pull off the move that gets us better

the Chiefs needed a qb as badly as we did, and what did Scott Peoli do?
brought in the qb that many of us wanted

the only thing JA has done this off season is use the coaches as a scapegoat for why the team did poorly the past couple seasons

we are 30 million under the cap and have more holes than the iraqi navy, why won’t this joker bring in some real talent, we are going to be awful last year

by SamuraiMike50 on Mar 3, 2009 11:37 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

I'm hoping

Frank “the Tank” sticks for his nickname.

If things came easy, then everybody would be great at what they did, let's face it.
Mike Ditka
Catch Phrase of the day: YAAAAAAAY! <---- Courtesy of ChiFan13.

by Ditkavsworld on Mar 4, 2009 1:41 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Thanks WCG

Ive been waiting to hear about this move and if it was for real or not. Sharper is not in his prime but he will help. Similar to when the Pats brought in Harrison. Sharper has always been a smart player and he can help our young guys like Payne and Steltz. It also would help with the field general in the secondary we lost in Brown. He shows up every Sunday and truely loves the game. Even though he played for the packers ( throws up in mouth) and the vikes I have always appreciated his passion and skills for this game.

by Hubstorm22Xxx23 on Mar 3, 2009 11:50 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Touche'

As you said I’ve always liked the guy. Hopefully he can be a mentor for Steltz and Payne, and he is smart.“This is a very Jerry Angelo move”, lol indeed.

"URLACHER IS GOD"

by Acreman20 on Mar 3, 2009 11:59 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Know all they need to do...

is sign a Ronald Curry type guy, so he can mentor Hester and Bennett. That would be a Jerry Angelo move. LOL!

by chase17 on Mar 4, 2009 6:42 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Good move

I imagine he will be signed relatively soon. Not a bad move, but a very JA move. And I believe I called it when I said now that all the high-priced guys are gone JA will get involved. I hate it when I am right in this instance.

by GallopingGhost on Mar 4, 2009 7:33 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

I don't mind

these small signings that save us money but come on bring in one big time free agent. Then go cheap on the rest.

"I guess I can’t do anything if you’re just irrational, but to point it out and move on."

- fundamentallysound

by J Theory on Mar 4, 2009 7:49 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

if it keeps steltz off the field

i guess it’s a good thing.

by mike b on Mar 4, 2009 8:44 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Difficult to compare Sharper and Brown

Yes the latter is younger by two years, but less healthy than the former. It’s hard to quantify who has better range in coverage at FS, but at this point in their careers I’d bet on Sharper. I’ve always admired MB since coming into the league, but there’s a reason why he hasn’t been heard of in free-agency and DS has.

"I'm not so mean. I wouldn't ever go out to hurt anybody deliberately - unless it was, you know, important, like a league game or something." - Dick Butkus

by propheteer on Mar 4, 2009 9:41 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Bad Idea

Too Old! Period.
OK – I guess – if they sign him for a one or two year deal at the NFL minimum.

"The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the intelligent are full of doubt." - Bertrand Russell

by phastphil on Mar 4, 2009 9:46 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

I'd like to say I'm shocked

by this move but then I’d be lying. I don’t hate it, I don’t love it either. JA is just being JA so I’m not going to get all upset because he won’t go after anyone if he has to spend some cash. Give me the checkbook I can spend the money better than he can.

If things came easy, then everybody would be great at what they did, let's face it.
Mike Ditka
Catch Phrase of the day: YAAAAAAAY! <---- Courtesy of ChiFan13.

by Ditkavsworld on Mar 4, 2009 9:59 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Sharper is only 33 years old.

He ain’t no spring chicken by any means, but he also just made the Pro Bowl in 2007. With our schedule in 2009, we will only face a few QB/WR tandems that could cause problems for our DBs. I definitely think Sharper can still hold his own for a couple more seasons.

Question is, will he play FS?

Things will get better as they improve...

by Dane Noble on Mar 4, 2009 10:18 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

I am not sure...

… that the Pro Bowl is necessarily indicative of a player’s ability.

Bringing moderation to a place I don't moderate.

visit the mindful mission

by big_lowitzki on Mar 4, 2009 12:20 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Not always,

but in Sharper’s case, he had the stats and team-impact to justify his selection.

Things will get better as they improve...

by Dane Noble on Mar 4, 2009 12:32 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

maybe...

In 2007, Sharper was 22nd in tackles among NFC safeties, he had zero sacks, he was 7th in int’s (tied with 3 others), 10th in PD’s, he had zero force fumbles and zero fumble recoveries, etc.

The Vikings were 5th in pts/game, 10th in yards per game.

I am not sure those stats justify a Pro Bowl.

Bringing moderation to a place I don't moderate.

visit the mindful mission

by big_lowitzki on Mar 4, 2009 1:03 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Sharper had 63 thackles that season,

and it is hard to compare just total numbers against other safeties. Minnesota had a much better set of DLinemen and LBs than a lot of other squads who may have had safeties making more tackles.

But also remember, stats are not the only thing that can justify Pro Bowl selections… he was a big-impact player for the Vikes that year… he came up big on 3rd down situations and rarely got beat. He was incredibly valuable for that team… and certainly deserved to go to the Pro Bowl.

Things will get better as they improve...

by Dane Noble on Mar 4, 2009 1:19 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

And don't forget that "thackles" are better than tackles. : )

Passion For The Game, Loyal To The Name, Chicago Bears, I Trust In Thee, Standing Strong Since 1983.

by Haightminow on Mar 4, 2009 1:23 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Bite me.

I get a mulligan a week, don’t I?

Things will get better as they improve...

by Dane Noble on Mar 4, 2009 2:03 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

You should

if Haight can still post on here he should let you slide.

If things came easy, then everybody would be great at what they did, let's face it.
Mike Ditka
Catch Phrase of the day: YAAAAAAAY! <---- Courtesy of ChiFan13.

by Ditkavsworld on Mar 4, 2009 2:18 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

fair enough...

But you said that his stats justify the inclusion, and I posted his stats showing that they didn’t really do so.

Don’t get me wrong – I still think that Sharper can be a relevant and productive player in this league, maybe even for the Bears. I just don’t think that the fact that he made the Pro Bowl in 2007 is very relevant.

Pro Bowls often have nothing, if anything, to do with actual performance. They are a popularity contest.

Bringing moderation to a place I don't moderate.

visit the mindful mission

by big_lowitzki on Mar 4, 2009 3:48 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I said he had the stats and team impact to jusify it...

and he did.

Things will get better as they improve...

by Dane Noble on Mar 4, 2009 3:57 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Not the stats part

his stats suggest he was a middle of the pack safety that year.

Not sure about the team impact part. Do we have to just take your word for it? Did you break down Vikings tape?

DEJESUS!!!

by tomas21 on Mar 4, 2009 4:21 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Don't have to break down film...

to see a player’s impact. But I did see a ton of Minny games, and his influence on that team was pretty obvious.

I’m not saying that we should definitely sign the guy… but with us not really doing anything in FA, the idea of bringing in someone, anyone, sounds good to me. :)

Things will get better as they improve...

by Dane Noble on Mar 4, 2009 4:24 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Eh

I’m fine with Omiyale. That move reminded me of Thomas Jones. A guy who never really had a chance where he was, who comes in and performs. Sharper has lost several steps, and if he really was that good, he wouldn’t keep getting released.

Nervous fan is nervous.

by tacologic on Mar 4, 2009 10:38 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Remember

The Vikes signed Madieu Williams last year to some pretty big money, so they couldn’t rationalize keeping an aging veteran.

"I'm not so mean. I wouldn't ever go out to hurt anybody deliberately - unless it was, you know, important, like a league game or something." - Dick Butkus

by propheteer on Mar 4, 2009 10:48 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Hey nervous fan who is nervous,

Sharper has only been cut once, and it was after the 2004 season with the Pack. That season, he had 70 tackles, 4 INTs, and 2 TDs.

In his 3 seasons with the Vikes, he earned 2 trips to the Pro Bowl. We could definitely do a lot worse than signing Sharper.

Things will get better as they improve...

by Dane Noble on Mar 4, 2009 10:49 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Except TJ

was a high first round pick, so presumably he had the talent, he just was in a bad situation. Omiyale was a 5th round pick, so he wasn’t highly regarded coming into the league, and hasn’t done anything so far to change that. Again, if the Panthers were so high on him, why did they trade up for Otah? If he is a great guard in the making, why didn’t the Panthers play him there?

Maybe he’ll be good, but I’m not getting my hopes up.

DEJESUS!!!

by tomas21 on Mar 4, 2009 12:15 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

we could do alot better as well

if we traded for Matt Giordano. AKA Littlte Lynch.

OH! STEWIE!! GET OUT THE WAY BOY! GET OUT THE WAY!
-Stacey King

by ifuwannacrownem on Mar 4, 2009 10:56 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

He is an UFA,

 
so no trades…

Just another player we won’t look at…

But good call, though… the dude had a serious motor on him.

Things will get better as they improve...

by Dane Noble on Mar 4, 2009 11:08 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I don't understand why

 they aren’t looking at Jermaine Phillips. he’s younger and is familiar with our system.

DEJESUS!!!

by tomas21 on Mar 4, 2009 12:15 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Angelo makes my stomach hurt.

Adam Archuleta anyone?? There were so many good safeties out there this free agency period…we get Sharper??

by Oblong Biscuits on Mar 4, 2009 2:21 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

sharper and archuleta...

… have little in common, other than they both are safeties.

Bringing moderation to a place I don't moderate.

visit the mindful mission

by big_lowitzki on Mar 4, 2009 3:49 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I also would

take Sean Jones over sharper

DEJESUS!!!

by tomas21 on Mar 4, 2009 3:18 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Didn't he blow out his knee?

Things will get better as they improve...

by Dane Noble on Mar 4, 2009 3:22 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

He hurt it

but didn’t blow it out. He played the last 2/3 of last year iirc. If it wasn’t for the injury he would’ve scored a major contract this year. He could be a serious steal, if the Bears wanted him.

DEJESUS!!!

by tomas21 on Mar 4, 2009 4:24 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Gotcha.

Well, the telling part of your statement is quickly becoming the mantra of this blog:

if the Bears wanted him

Things will get better as they improve...

by Dane Noble on Mar 4, 2009 4:26 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Maybe a mark against Sharper

This throws a new light on Sharper’s potential move, if true:

"Sharper spoke about the reasons why he’ll sign with the team he chooses essentially looking to land with a team in the hunt for a title therefore giving himself the best chance to kiss the trophy before he retires.

…If the Bears land Sharper the money will obviously be Sharper’s first motivation because the title aspirations are far fetched. The question then is what will his motivation to contribute be? I would guess two years of decent production and then retirement, not exactly something the Bears need at free-safety."

Have to agree with the blogger, Stetz didn’t impressing against the run and he’s meant to be a strong safety, so…..

by Spongie on Mar 5, 2009 1:48 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

UGH

Why do the Bears keep doing this? They sign guys that have lost a leg or are on their last leg and think it will help our team. We need FRESH guys with talent, and i hope JA will find some in the draft. Not saying Sharper is bad, he’s just at the end of his career. If some of our guys hadn’t “mailed it in” after they were paid their millions, I wouldn’t be as worried, but some did and here we are. Get some OFFENSE first, or defense used to win games for us before, but they can’t do it anymore.

by Bearsguy34 on Mar 5, 2009 4:34 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

+1

Amen on the offense sir. Marinelli will (hopefully) be able to get our front 7 into shape, but our OLine needs some help if we are going to be competitive for the next few years.

Welcome aboard, btw!

Ryan Perilloux in 2010!!

by Dane Noble on Mar 5, 2009 6:18 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

because young and fresh

equals money.

Being Who You Thought We Were Since 2005!

by Adam T on Mar 5, 2009 7:32 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Thanks Geaux

I have been a Bears fan all my life (even though I live in Minnesota and surround by obnoxious, ignorant Viking fans), and sometime I wonder which team is going to show up on the field any given Sunday. One observation I have had with JA is that he was KING OF THE WORLD when we went to the SB a few (sad) years ago. Everyone loved him then (cause we were, ahem, WINNING). Now, everyone hates him because we are, well, not. That happens a lot in sports. People hate people when they aren’t winning, and LOVE Lovie and JA when we’re winning. I hate to say it, but JA did a fairly decent job getting the Bears at least the opportunity to get to the SB. I also have to admit that sometimes when people throw money at big, dumb, arrogant athletes, it doesn’t always work out. I LOVED Nate Vasher as few years ago, but since he god PAID, he hasn’t been himself. Cause he got PAID. Real football players make money and try harder because they love the game. It’s hard to find those players theses days, and it seems like JA feels the same way. I agree that we need some better players on our squad (God love em), but we have a lot of money to hopefully pay #22 (he’s Paytonlike), and hopefully a stud WR or OT from the draft. We don’t need washed up players looking for a two year contract to finish their career, even though TJ would have been awesome. We need guys who want to play Bear football, not a T.O or even a Dawkins.
We need a GM who will get players that want to play in Chicago, but the only way that will happen, is if we have a happy family for them to join, AND we loosen our purse strings. And from the sounds of it, not too many FA seem to think that we are. Sad but true.

by Bearsguy34 on Mar 5, 2009 8:43 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome Grabowskis, to SB Nation's blog about everything Chicago Bears.

Community Guidelines
Start posting about the Bears »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Chicago-bears-logo_small
I Got this Backer's Back
Dsc01037_small
PhotoShop Contest: Pat Mannelly
Dsc01037_small
WCG Community Updates (Updated again)

Recent FanPosts

Mug_adebisi_small
"Arc"
Ditkaworld_small
I'm 3D- Disgusted, Dejected and Disappointed
Blake_again_small
I Predict............Week 11 Philadelphia @ Bears.
Bears_small
When you go to the flea market, it's all about planning.
Mug_adebisi_small
This has been the plan all along.
N506182155_6296_small
Bears 2010 schedule released.
Blake_again_small
Garrett Wolfe Out For the Year (Updated)
Bears2_small
Key Player to keep an eye on: LeSean McCoy
Bears2_small
Years of neglecting the Offensive Line finally catching up with Angelo

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

SPONSORS


General Manager/ Head Coach

Windycity_small Adam T

Dsc01037_small Dane Noble

Position Coaches

Evalltheway_small SackMan

Briggsie_small ChiFan13

Leelee_n_laylor_bff wiltfongjr