Windy City Gridiron: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
New Blog: Cottagers Confidential for Fulham FC Fans!

Orton's Job In Jeopardy

ESPN's First Take reported today that Denver is actively pursuing Cleveland's Brady Quinn.

You would think a Franchise would learn about trade rumors after the debacle in Denver.

I'd hate to see Orton's job being taken away in a situation like this,I'm curious as to who the Bronco's would like starting at QB this season.It's a good time to be a Bears fan,but a Bronco's fan I'm not so sure of.

0 recs  |  Comment 62 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

This could end up being very interesting.

If you can find a link, post it up. But definitely a story worth following…

Be nice. Flag comments that you think are offensive. Use the "reply" button. Drink plenty of water. Compliment others. Rec comments and posts you like. Don't call people names. If you don't like someone's comment, attack the comment and not the commentor. Learn the difference in your/you're, then/than, to/too. Exercise. Relax. Stretch often. Find good in the world.

by Dane Noble on May 13, 2009 11:26 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Orton was already in a competition with Simms.

And I’m sure that the Broncos have become concerned after seeing his deep ball woes for themselves. Plus his inability to scramble outside the pocket. Remember, they are used to seeing Cutler do these with ease on a regular basis. Orton or any other QB has some very big shoes to fill in Denver.

Passion For The Game, Loyal To The Name, Chicago Bears, I Trust In Thee, Standing Strong Since 1983.

by Haightminow on May 13, 2009 11:30 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

That

Is so ridiculous. I love the Broncos but (prior to this as well) I think if I saw McDaniels I would try to tear his heart out and throw him in a pit of lava, Temple of Doom style. Lets do an analogy shall we? If Chicago:Where receivers go to die, then Denver:______.

!

by Qgee on May 13, 2009 11:37 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Lets do an a analogy conditional statement shall we?

If Chicago:Where receivers go to die, then Denver: Where their coach is their worst enemy.

Be nice. Flag comments that you think are offensive. Use the "reply" button. Drink plenty of water. Compliment others. Rec comments and posts you like. Don't call people names. If you don't like someone's comment, attack the comment and not the commentor. Learn the difference in your/you're, then/than, to/too. Exercise. Relax. Stretch often. Find good in the world.

by Dane Noble on May 13, 2009 11:46 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Acceptable

I was more going for Denver:Where Quarterbacks go to get shanked in the spine by their HC, but your answer is ok.

!

by Qgee on May 13, 2009 12:07 PM CDT up reply actions   2 recs

Lol

6 of one, 1/2 dozen of the other I reckon.

Be nice. Flag comments that you think are offensive. Use the "reply" button. Drink plenty of water. Compliment others. Rec comments and posts you like. Don't call people names. If you don't like someone's comment, attack the comment and not the commentor. Learn the difference in your/you're, then/than, to/too. Exercise. Relax. Stretch often. Find good in the world.

by Dane Noble on May 13, 2009 12:08 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Denver:

Where QBs go to have temper tantrums?

"I'm not so mean. I wouldn't ever go out to hurt anybody deliberately - unless it was, you know, important, like a league game or something." - Dick Butkus

by propheteer on May 13, 2009 1:23 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thanks GB

I was trying to be PC by not uttering something else, but obviously the word I chose didn’t help that cause.

"I'm not so mean. I wouldn't ever go out to hurt anybody deliberately - unless it was, you know, important, like a league game or something." - Dick Butkus

by propheteer on May 13, 2009 1:24 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

No worries sir.

It’s always good to see our members trying to keep things as productive as possible.

Be nice. Flag comments that you think are offensive. Use the "reply" button. Drink plenty of water. Compliment others. Rec comments and posts you like. Don't call people names. If you don't like someone's comment, attack the comment and not the commentor. Learn the difference in your/you're, then/than, to/too. Exercise. Relax. Stretch often. Find good in the world.

by Dane Noble on May 13, 2009 1:54 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Kyle Orton is not a NFL starting quarterback

At best he is a serviceable backup quarterback. It hasnt’ taken Denver to realize that, though I suspect they already knew this about Orton before he was included in the Cutler deal.

by BLou on May 13, 2009 12:00 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

RE: Kyle Orton is not a NFL starting quarterback

Please. Look at his record, what he’s faced in his career, and don’t say stupid things like that.

by Irish Bears Fan on May 15, 2009 4:21 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hmm on ESPN (NFL rumors section)

it says that Quinn is likely to be the opening day starter for the browns and that they received two substantial offers for him (including first round picks) that they rejected. It’s on ESPN Insider so I’ll just post the article:

A source has told Tony Grossi of The Cleveland Plain Dealer that Brady Quinn will be the starting quarterback for the Cleveland Browns in Week 1 of the 2009 NFL season. Although the source does admit that there will be an “open competition” between Quinn and Derek Anderson, Quinn will emerge as the victor. The source also stated that there were two “very substantial” trade offers for Quinn that the team rejected, both of which involved a first-round draft pick.

Grossi decided to have a little fun with everyone, too, describing his source as follows: “I recently spoke with someone I will identify as a league source. This person does not work for an NFL team but works with NFL teams and has a prominent name.” Based on the information this person provided, it would seem that they must have pretty high level access – especially considering the general impenetrability of the Browns’ organization under the Eric Mangini-George Kokinis regime – but their identity will remain a mystery unless Grossi wishes to divulge this secret sometime in the future.
Quinn played in three games in 2008, completing 50.6 percent of his passes for 518 yards, throwing two touchdowns against two interceptions, earning a 66.6 QB rating. This rating falls in the “poor” range, but is actually better than the 66.5 rating Anderson put up over the course of a 10-game campaign.

That’s all from the same article, couldn’t make it stay in the same quote box…

"One time I went to a social gathering, I brought a bottle of Tanqueray and a shotgun and showed those motherf&#@ers the best time they ever had!"- Kenny Powers (Eastbound and Down)

"Why give 100% when 35 can still get you paid and laid."- Kenny Powers

by gridiron_assassin on May 13, 2009 12:01 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I'm going to let this one roll

but in the future we are not allowed to publish anything that is on a pay site, unless it is in a free section. You also need to provide a link to the story even if it goes to the page that has two lines of the story and asks you to sign up.

Being Who You Thought We Were Since 2005!

by Adam T on May 13, 2009 12:06 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oh my bad,

didn’t know that. But technically I didn’t have to pay for Insider because it came free with my ESPN mag subscription (which was also free) :) I know what you mean though

"One time I went to a social gathering, I brought a bottle of Tanqueray and a shotgun and showed those motherf&#@ers the best time they ever had!"- Kenny Powers (Eastbound and Down)

"Why give 100% when 35 can still get you paid and laid."- Kenny Powers

by gridiron_assassin on May 13, 2009 11:30 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Eric Mangini isn't a fan of Brady Quinn

That much is clear. Quinn strikes me as a cross between Rex Grossman and Cade McNown. So does Matt Leinert.

by BLou on May 13, 2009 12:09 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I have to admit

This McDaniels-Belichick-Mangini quarterback love triangle is working out strangely in the NFL, no? Odd coincidence or evil master plan by the Hoodie?

!

by Qgee on May 13, 2009 12:13 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Be nice. Flag comments that you think are offensive. Use the "reply" button. Drink plenty of water. Compliment others. Rec comments and posts you like. Don't call people names. If you don't like someone's comment, attack the comment and not the commentor. Learn the difference in your/you're, then/than, to/too. Exercise. Relax. Stretch often. Find good in the world.

by Dane Noble on May 13, 2009 12:18 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I get what you are saying

But does that mean that Mangini and McDaniels are actually his twin children destined to face him? I would love to see one of those teams get to the AFC Championship against the Hoodie only for him to reveal that he is their father (in order to gain an advantage in the game). Oh the drama!

!

by Qgee on May 13, 2009 12:36 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Have you checked your email?

Be nice. Flag comments that you think are offensive. Use the "reply" button. Drink plenty of water. Compliment others. Rec comments and posts you like. Don't call people names. If you don't like someone's comment, attack the comment and not the commentor. Learn the difference in your/you're, then/than, to/too. Exercise. Relax. Stretch often. Find good in the world.

by Dane Noble on May 13, 2009 1:17 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think what McDaniels has been doing in Denver PR wise is unbelieveable

If you go to their blog site, they are so sure about Orton being great that they are saying they would take him over Cutler. Some of that is trying to come to grips with the trade but some of it is what McDaniels has done.

Telling his fans that it’s Orton is the guy that made the deal and that Orton will fit perfectly in what his system calls is a bunch of crap. He know what he gave up. To market a guy who technically couldn’t beat out Rex Grossman for a job last pre-season as the next Ben Rothlisberger or even Matt Cassell is ridiculous. I mean those fans are really drinking the kool-aid because of this guy McDaniels. He’s seen Orton and he knows darn well that if Denver had Randy Moss, Orton couldn’t hit him on a fly pattern like Cassell or Brady did in New England. He knew this about Orton then. So I think the rumors may be true that he’s going for Quinn.

by Dils on May 13, 2009 12:54 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

To market a guy who technically couldn’t beat out Rex Grossman

Because the Bears didn’t give Grossman far more chances than any sane organisation should have, simply because of his first round status? As if we didn’t have form in that regard (c.f. nearly all first round picks in recent seasons).

by Spongie on May 13, 2009 2:14 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm not trying to rehash the old argument

They both are gone but those are just the facts. Orton didn’t beat about Rex and there’s no denying it. Thanks to a few great catches by Lloyd in a pre-season 2 minute drill he was given that job last year. Lovie didn’t feel like dealing with the media and fans about the controversy so he just ended it. True Rex was given plenty chances and as of a result he has a NFC championship ring and a SuperBowl appearance. Orton was and we were 9-7 last year. Different teams? Yes. But it is what it is. By the way if Orton was and is so good, then why did Brian Griese start and play ahead of him in ’07. I never hear anyone bring up that point.

by Dils on May 13, 2009 4:33 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Griese? You mean one of the four QBs the Broncos put in the Pro Bowl in roughly a decade?

"C" is for Championship...that's good enough for meeeee!!!

by PosterNutbag on May 14, 2009 10:36 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, they will chase him out of there with torches

if their season goes like I think it will. As far as Orton goes, he may not be the most talented qb in the NFL but he is better than Simms hands down. Finally, Daniels might just be the next Jim Jones…cool aid for everyone.

Hear about the blind hooker, you gotta hand it to her.

by Bears fan 4-ever!!! on May 13, 2009 3:12 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

wtf is going on in denver

between the qb situation and the fact that they r trying to stack up rbs left and right is making my head spin. i couldnt understand in the draft why they picked a rb so high when they signed like a million of them already. i think that denver is gonna flop because they have no idea what the hell they are doing.

by rcbrach on May 13, 2009 1:00 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

This is the worst start to a coaches career ever.

Either McDaniels is trying to be the Bucs of the West and gather as many QBs as possible and not like any of them or he just does not know what he wants. They should have traded Cutler to the Browns if he likes Quinn over Orton, you had the chance man.

by GallopingGhost on May 13, 2009 4:58 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

WTF are they smoking at Mile high (maybe the name has something to do with it???)

Let’s not toss the baby with the bathwater – the no huddle has its place, as everyone seems to agree. But the reason that Orton excelled with it was that he is superb at calling audibles. His ability to read defenses and come up with alternative plays is apparently a game changer. McDaniels has already commented that this is one of the strengths that he will require from his offense, so Orton seems to continue to fit it well.

Jeez, I didn’t realize we already had Tom Brady/Peyton Manning on our roster, why the hell did we let him go for that bum Cutler?? (sarcasm….). That is the kool aid capital of the world..(although most of them are pretty good guys)

This broncobear guy is constantly spewing about how he knows the bears better than any bear fan alive, he breaks down film to get the inside scoop. He should tell Lovie and Ron Turner hello from all of us and let him know some of our ideas..

by tfrabotta on May 14, 2009 8:29 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

wtf is going on in denver

I’m a lifelong Bears fan living in Aurora, Colorado (you’d recognize me as the only guy wearing a Cutler jersey) and I have a few observations concerning the Broncos; J Mac is in wayyyyyyyyyyy over his head! To me, the dude has the Hoodie swagger without the Hoodie genius. Man-gina is in the same mold. They inheritted all of daddy’s bad traits (parnoid, cocky, inderrent to player morale) without his unique ability to “think outta the box” competitively. BTW; Man-gina is collecting WR’s like J Mac is gobbling up RB’s. Weird. I had a PC game called Mike Ditka Football in the early 90’s and the Broncos would stack RB’s like cord-wood in that game. How ironical!

by Fly1965 on May 14, 2009 9:06 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

If McD has shown anything at this point it’s that he’s perfectly willing to “think outta the box”.

"C" is for Championship...that's good enough for meeeee!!!

by PosterNutbag on May 14, 2009 10:44 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think you guys should probably give the teams the chance to play a game before you jump to conclusions.

It’s quite possible that Cutler isn’t half the QB that you guys think he is and McD knows exactly what he’s doing. We’ll just have to wait and see.

"C" is for Championship...that's good enough for meeeee!!!

by PosterNutbag on May 14, 2009 10:46 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Sounds like a Raiders/Lions Argument to me.

Well unfortunately the season won’t start up for awhile, so if you expect people not to judge your team for the moves it has made then I am guessing you still put out milk and cookies for Santa in December. That being said, with the style of “out-of-the-box” thinking that McDaniels brings (that non-Broncos fans (and 50% of Broncos fans) think is retarded) I’ll give my “out-of-the-box” prediction that the Broncos will fight their hardest to tie the Lions for the incredible record they broke last season.

!

by Qgee on May 14, 2009 11:11 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I just think you guys are a little too excited about easily the most overrated QB in the NFL in terms of actual achievement to public perception. You’re putting all your eggs into the ‘potential’ basket which doesn’t always pan out in the NFL. Cutler may be great. He may be mediocre. He could be a bust for the Bears. Nothing in his past has made me think that he’s guaranteed to be the next great QB. I just think you guys should tone down your expectations or you’re likely to be disappointed (see…I’m just looking out for you guys here ;-D) I also think it’s funny the nearly every Bears fan I know (which is for some reason quite a few of them…Denver seems to be a popular destination for Bears fans) was singing the Orton gospel until this trade happened and then all of a sudden he’s a ‘backup at best’. I’ve watched 3 or 4 NFLN Replays of Bears games from the past season and in two of those games Orton played as good of a game as I’ve ever seen from Cutler. He didn’t have as much fireworks but he didn’t have nearly as many dumb mistakes either.

"C" is for Championship...that's good enough for meeeee!!!

by PosterNutbag on May 14, 2009 11:26 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

A couple of things to consider:

Cutler has only played in 2 NFL seasons. This is important because
1- He has proven that he can excel in the NFL, and
2- He is still young enough to continue improving.

Another thing is that I would say more people think that Orton could be a serviceable starter. While he isn’t all-world, I would think that there are fewer people who thinks his is only a backup versus the number of people who thinks he is a bonafide starter.

Be nice. Flag comments that you think are offensive. Use the "reply" button. Drink plenty of water. Compliment others. Rec comments and posts you like. Don't call people names. If you don't like someone's comment, attack the comment and not the commentor. Learn the difference in your/you're, then/than, to/too. Exercise. Relax. Stretch often. Find good in the world.

by Dane Noble on May 14, 2009 11:36 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Completely agree with all the points except for point one which I only partially agree with. Cutler has shown he can put up big numbers and get some wins but hasn’t shown the ability to get the big win when it matter most. Don’t get me wrong, I’m not trying to bash your QB…just trying to instill some balance to the discussion.

"C" is for Championship...that's good enough for meeeee!!!

by PosterNutbag on May 14, 2009 12:11 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Very true, he hasn't won that many big games,

but he has only been in the league 3 years. Plus, the Broncs sent 72 RBs to the IR last year, and that screwed their entire offense up.

Be nice. Flag comments that you think are offensive. Use the "reply" button. Drink plenty of water. Compliment others. Rec comments and posts you like. Don't call people names. If you don't like someone's comment, attack the comment and not the commentor. Learn the difference in your/you're, then/than, to/too. Exercise. Relax. Stretch often. Find good in the world.

by Dane Noble on May 14, 2009 12:12 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Was it 72? That seems a little high. ;-)

I agree that the RB injuries hurt the Broncos offense, but not as bad as most would think. Of the seven RBs they played last year the lowest ypc of all of them was 4.1. Also, the no RB broke 400 yards last year so they never really settled on a single back. Even Tater was getting yards towards the end of the season. I’ve always maintained that Shanahan’s system allowed pretty much anybody to be successful running the ball and I think last year was maybe the greatest evidence of that theory. Hell…our best RB was a converted FB.

"C" is for Championship...that's good enough for meeeee!!!

by PosterNutbag on May 14, 2009 12:20 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I am always amazed after Cutler left Denver

that his 17-20 record is soley on his shoulders. They guy puts up mega points only to lose games. Maybe if his defense was not one fo the worst of all time, he wouldn’t have to try and score more points and force throws and such. It had to be a lot of pressure on him knowing that his defense was going to give up a boat load of points and yards and knowing he has to out do that game in and game out. the guy was doing his job – 94% Qb rating in the 4th qtr, 3rd in the NFL in 3rd down conversion what else can he do except suit up and play safety.

by tfrabotta on May 14, 2009 12:34 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think that very few people put the 17-20 record solely on Cutler. However, I don’t think it should be ignore either. Particularly considering the fact that Jake Plummer led the Broncos to a 13-3 record the year prior to Cutler taking the realms (obviously there are numerous mitigating factors).

As much as he shouldn’t be held entirely responsible for his record, he also shouldn’t receive all of the credit for his success. As I’ve previously pointed out, Denver had a very QB friendly system. In roughly a decade they send four different QBs to the Pro Bowl (Elway, Griese, Plummer, and Cutler). And I’ve know you’ve heard about the talent surrounding Cutler in Denver ad nauseum so I’ll spare you that lecture.

As I said originally, there are so many complicating variable in Cutler’s successes and failures that I think the only reasonable approach is to wait and see how he fairs in Chicago. Again, I’m not trying to bash Cutler. I’m just trying to instill a little balance into the discussion.

"C" is for Championship...that's good enough for meeeee!!!

by PosterNutbag on May 14, 2009 12:46 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

wow…I must have really misspelled ‘reins’ for spellcheck to change it to ‘realms’. Obviously, I meant ’"prior to Cutler taking the reins".

"C" is for Championship...that's good enough for meeeee!!!

by PosterNutbag on May 14, 2009 12:50 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

man…I really need to start proofreading. ;-)

"C" is for Championship...that's good enough for meeeee!!!

by PosterNutbag on May 14, 2009 12:51 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I am with you

as I have tried to stem the “Orton for Hall of Fame” talk at MHR. We are simply excited because we have not had a QB with the physical talents that Cutler has which will make everyone around him better including Ron Turner. Does that mean we will be 13-3?? No, I don’t think so. But it should get us at least one more win and be at 10-6. We apprciate KO and his leadership abilities but I think most would tell you that he was never going to lead us deep in the playoffs and that we had tpo do whatever we could to land a star QB with abilities. The thing I will look for the most is will Cutler make those average wr’s better than they are. I think we have improved our OL with FA to be at least average or better and RB will make them even better which will help Jay out. We shall see.

by tfrabotta on May 14, 2009 12:53 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed.

One thing that might help you understand the mentality of MHR, and their inability/unwillingness to see your side of the argument, is the concept of ‘LaLa Land’. LaLa land is a philosophy that began prior to last season that implies a sort of willful uninhibited optimism and support for all things Broncos. The LaLa land motto is “13-3 Baby”. Typically LaLa land is a philosophy that is only heavily endorsed in the offseason and preseason. I think that the basis of this outlook is rooted in the fact that almost everything can be seen through at least two different lenses (as perhaps evidenced by this discussion) and, therefore, LaLa land advocates choose to see everything through a ‘glass is half full’ lens…or maybe in their case, a ‘glass is completely full’ lens.

Many visitors to MHR are understandably confused by the LaLa Landers and are almost offended by there unbridled optimism. Nevertheless, the residents of LaLa land do provide a nice refuge from the perpetually negativity of the MSM and the horrid faders and chefs fans that inevitably infest our fine site.

I hope that clears up any confusion. ;-)

"C" is for Championship...that's good enough for meeeee!!!

by PosterNutbag on May 14, 2009 1:09 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I kind of got that

and that’s okay. I never got offended but just wanted to have some good rationale discussions on the subject but it never got off the ground. Almost all of guys over there are good eggs, fun to discuss things. Just not broncobear who tells everyone that is a bear fan that they are dumb and don’t know what they are talking about with their own team..

by tfrabotta on May 14, 2009 1:36 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Although most of the posts at MHR seem to

have the tone that Jay wasn’t a winner and that Orton is. I think they are both winners and their supporting casts help to make the difference (defense, rb, wr, special teams). 11 of KO’s wins were in 2005 when our defense was arguable the best in the league and our special teams seemed to score weekly. That sure helps out your W-L %. I am sure JC Oline and wr helped out his success as well but the ST and Defense was not doing him any favors.

by tfrabotta on May 14, 2009 12:57 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Just about every bear fan you know was “singing Orton’s praises?” What kind of dopes do you hang out with?

by The Kaiser on May 14, 2009 11:37 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well…I’m pretty sure you could look at the fanposts at WCG from this past season and find some pretty positive feedback on Orton. I don’t know why you’d want to insult your WCG brethren like that.

"C" is for Championship...that's good enough for meeeee!!!

by PosterNutbag on May 14, 2009 12:08 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Here is one FanPost, right in the middle of the Cutler sweepstakes.

Link pops.

Be nice. Flag comments that you think are offensive. Use the "reply" button. Drink plenty of water. Compliment others. Rec comments and posts you like. Don't call people names. If you don't like someone's comment, attack the comment and not the commentor. Learn the difference in your/you're, then/than, to/too. Exercise. Relax. Stretch often. Find good in the world.

by Dane Noble on May 14, 2009 12:11 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

That’s encouraging! Thanks. ;-)

"C" is for Championship...that's good enough for meeeee!!!

by PosterNutbag on May 14, 2009 12:13 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah well I've seen comments from Broncos fans

where Orton is the second coming of Brady or Rothlisberger. And Somehow McDaniels is the evil genius who’s planned this out all along.

I think Broncos fans are some of the best in the league and the way you guys support your team is the way us Bears fans support ours. But it really amazes me that a 32yr old unproven coach who comes from a coaching tree of unsuccessful coaches, with the exception of Belichek himself can walk into Denver and trade away a 25 yr old probowl QB because he’s too stupid not to hangup the phone when some other team calls about his QB, is given the benefit of the doubt. Are you guys aware of what this guy did?? Do you know how hard it is to find a good QB let alone someone with the potential to be great? Maybe you dont because you guys had Elway. Well welcome to the real NFL world my friend. You’re now officially in QB Hell.
 
So sure as Bears fans excuse us for being excited to have a QB darn near did in one season what Orton has in his whole career.

 

by Dils on May 14, 2009 9:23 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Posternutbag,
  Per your own criteria, “I’ve watched 3 or 4 NFLN Replays of Bears games…” Rex Grossman qualifies as a starter. Kyle Orton is definately a “decent” QB, but he is not and probably never will be (in my humble opinion) a probowler. Didn’t the Broncos have “all of their eggs in one basket” when they had Elway? CUtler is an upgrade over Orton by just about anybody’s standards. Besides all of that, the point remains that it is believed that JMac was trying to get Cassel (all eggs in one basket?) and Quinn. This is very puzzling, considering the offense was their strength last year.

by Fly1965 on May 14, 2009 11:56 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I agree it’s puzzling. It also indicates to me that McD saw something he didn’t like about Culter…or at least thought wouldn’t be a great fit for his system.

"C" is for Championship...that's good enough for meeeee!!!

by PosterNutbag on May 14, 2009 12:03 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I look at it like this...

McDaniels wanted his guy. He developed Matt Cassell, and wanted him. I don’t think it is necessarily a knock against Cutler, but he is a new coach, and trying to surround himself with his people.

Look at what Parcells did when he went to Miami… he brought in as many of his former people from Dallas that he could. I know that is a little different, but it sort of helps explain my point.

Be nice. Flag comments that you think are offensive. Use the "reply" button. Drink plenty of water. Compliment others. Rec comments and posts you like. Don't call people names. If you don't like someone's comment, attack the comment and not the commentor. Learn the difference in your/you're, then/than, to/too. Exercise. Relax. Stretch often. Find good in the world.

by Dane Noble on May 14, 2009 12:09 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think some of that was going on. But there are other things that were a little questionable too. For example, who pays a backup QB 6 million (Simms). Also, there is some speculation that McD was interested in Quinn before a trade ever happened. Finally, the bottom line is that McD and the Broncos had all the power and if they were 100% committed to keeping Cutler then he’d still be a Bronco. I realize Cutler was intent on making that difficult for them; however, other teams have been in a similar situation and didn’t budge with relatively successful outcomes.

"C" is for Championship...that's good enough for meeeee!!!

by PosterNutbag on May 14, 2009 12:16 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

As far as Simms' contract,

It was 2 years worth 6mil. And 1.5mil was a signing bonus… so his salary is 2mil for this year, and 2.5 for 2010. Not a bad price to pay for what could potentially be a great back-up QB.

As far as the Broncs being able to keep Cutler had they wanted to, I disagree. I think once Cutler made up his mind, there was nothing that they could do. He forced their hand.

Be nice. Flag comments that you think are offensive. Use the "reply" button. Drink plenty of water. Compliment others. Rec comments and posts you like. Don't call people names. If you don't like someone's comment, attack the comment and not the commentor. Learn the difference in your/you're, then/than, to/too. Exercise. Relax. Stretch often. Find good in the world.

by Dane Noble on May 14, 2009 12:22 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don’t know. He had always maintained that he would be there for any mandatory OTAs. And also his whole “I didn’t expect to be traded” routine…whatever you care to make of that. Frankly, I’ve sort of given up trying to figure out exactly what happened there. It’s over and done and everybody has moved on…so I followed their lead.

"C" is for Championship...that's good enough for meeeee!!!

by PosterNutbag on May 14, 2009 12:25 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm sure a lot of the dialogue that was coming form both sides

was just posturing for media perception. And you are right, no one will ever truly know what really went on behind closed doors. I do know that Bus Cook is an arse though.

But you are right again… what’s done is done… and only time will tell if Cutler can make things happen in Chicago.

Be nice. Flag comments that you think are offensive. Use the "reply" button. Drink plenty of water. Compliment others. Rec comments and posts you like. Don't call people names. If you don't like someone's comment, attack the comment and not the commentor. Learn the difference in your/you're, then/than, to/too. Exercise. Relax. Stretch often. Find good in the world.

by Dane Noble on May 14, 2009 12:31 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

On that we can most certainly agree…Bus Cook is definitely an arse.

"C" is for Championship...that's good enough for meeeee!!!

by PosterNutbag on May 14, 2009 12:38 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

McDaniels didn't get rid of Cutler .......

What kind of a douche would think that Josh McDaniels went to Denver with a brief to get rid of their franchise QB ? Cutler saw his situation in Denver was not good. If a QB as good as he is can get 8-8 out of them then who’s to say they wouldn’t have gone 0-16 without him. No running game, defense sucked. Cutler is where Cutler wants to be, where he always wanted to be …. home.

by Irish Bears Fan on May 15, 2009 4:37 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Consider this...

As a Bear Fan living in Colorado, I obviously followed this closely. And I learned ALOT from a Radio Host named Dave Logan (an ex-Bronco with “sources” within the organization). He was extremely upset about the trade and didn’t try to hide it. During JMac’s interview after the trade, Logan seemed to hint that, according to his sources, JMac was less than forthright with his statements. After Shanny was chopped, Bowlen did, in fact, tell Sir J that his offensive coaches would be kept in place. After all, the offense wasn’t the weakness. Bowlen must have planned on hiring a defensive-minded coach. After JMac was hired, that went out the window and the previous offensive staff was chopped. (Bowlen later said he didn’t remember the conversation with Jay but it probably happened) Anyway, after that, Jay did sit down with JMac and was told that he (Jay) was a perfect “fit” for JMac’s system and would thrive in it. Shortly afterwards, news surfaced that JMac was actively pursuing Cassel. Jmac told Cutler and the media that the Broncos had received a few calls and simply listened to them. Here, Logan hints that JMac initiated the calls and was bent on trading for Cassel. After this, Jay and JMac again sat down and Jmac went all Hoodie on Jay, stating that, although Jay’s their QB, ANYBODY can and will be traded if it will improve the team. Here, Jay stated that he came from the meeting believing he was still on the trading block. I believe that, after being lied to by both the owner AND the new coach (twice), Jay he now refused to sit down and listen to either of them again. At this point, I still think Jay thought this would all blow over, since the mandatory stuff was months away. I honestly believe Jay was stunned that the Broncos traded him, since he really had no leverage to force a trade. Per Dave Logan, JMac never wanted Jay and did what he had to do to get rid of him. Here’s what I think: Had JMac instantly returned the Broncos to the playoffs, people would have felt that it was partly because Shanny drafted a great QB. Who knows? However, Washington just went threw a similiar situation but were upfront with their QB throughout the entire process. THey seem to be in much better shape then Denver. Hmmmm…

by Fly1965 on May 15, 2009 9:17 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Windy City Gridiron is the best independent site on the internet for breaking news, in-depth analysis, and hardcore discussion about the Chicago Bears

Community Guidelines
Start posting about the Bears »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

Comcast NFL RedZone Moments from SB Nation

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Twitter-kevin-payne-right_small
There Are Two Too Many NFL Preseason Games - @Kevin_Payne
Chris_harris_headshot_2_small
Julius Peppers: The Bears' New Beast - @ChrisHarrisNFL
Urlacher_small
Chicago should draft (insert player)!!!!!!!!
Twitter-kevin-payne-right_small
How 'Bout Those Moves the Bears Made!?! - @Kevin_Payne
Brule2_small
The Poison Pill Strategy: Should the Bears Use It?

Recent FanPosts

Bears-tunnel_small
Could Kevin Curtis be Chicago bound ?
19936057_m_medium_small
Bears' Madness: Midwest (7) McMichael vs (10) Booker
19936057_m_medium_small
Bears' Madness: Midwest (6) Blanda vs (11) Duerson
19936057_m_medium_small
Bears' Madness: West (5) Doug Plank vs (12) Doug Buffone
19936057_m_medium_small
Bears' Madness: West (4) Olin Kreutz vs (13) Mark Carrier
19936057_m_medium_small
Bears' Madness: South (8) Devin Hester vs (9) Neal Anderson
19936057_m_medium_small
Bears' Madness: East (6) Richie Petitbon vs (11) Tom Thayer
Zoo_080_small
j-man needs your help
Bears2_small
NiqueBears Mock Draft for the Bears Updated 3/17
19936057_m_medium_small
Bears' Madness: West (8) James Williams vs (9) Rick Casares

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

Music City Miracles
Alge Crumpler Agrees to Terms with the New England Patriots
Pats Pulpit
TE Alge Crumpler has Agreed to Terms with the New England Patriots
Mocking The Draft
Perrish Cox NFL Draft scouting report

SPONSORS

SBNation.com Recent Stories

Photo link

A Deeper Look At The 2009 Cowboys Running Game

Photo

Redskins Hosting Private Workout For Oklahoma QB Sam Bradford

Photo

Conflicting Reports On The Future Of 49ers GM Scot McCloughan

More from SBNation.com >


Managers

Windycity_small Adam T

Photo_small Dane Noble

Editor

19554_711053815498_20723723_41499369_7695586_n_small HoneyBear

Contributing Writers

19936057_m_medium_small MuleTrain

Evalltheway_small SackMan

Bears_small Sklz711

Attachment27_small Lester A. Wiltfong Jr.

Bow-icon_small smudgers

Chicago-bears-logo_small Mark Saade

N506182155_130313_2606_small Kev H