Windy City Gridiron: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: RSL Soapbox for Real Salt Lake Fans!

Breaking Down the Play That Ended The Bears' Season

 So I thought that I'd give you guys a looksie into the play that ended our season last year.

Week 17 vs Texans....

Video

The play started with the base Tampa-2 with the responsibilities of the base defense shown.

Tampa2jpg_medium

The offense is running an easy I formation, a very common running formation, as evidenced by the fullback and strong side TE. This formation is a power running formation with the fullback typically leading through the 3 or the 5 hole and engageing the linebacker on the second level. Kyle Shanahan sees the Tampa base and employs what coordinators call a cover -2 beater.

Inside we can take a look at the Play....

Star-divide

Tampa2jpg_medium
 # 1 is the Play-action. The fullback steps to the 5 hole and blocks.  Schuab fakes the hand off to Slaton who delays a flat route.

This is essential to the play because it forces the S to step up to look run.  The only safety that is supposed to do that is Kevin Payne the SS. Danieal Manning makes the Nickel Back read and steps up to play the run as well.

Tampa2jpg_medium

#2 is the #2 reciever, in this case Andre Davis, running a stop route designed to enter and exit the corner's cover responsibilities thus containing the corner for the flat route or the TE post pattern in #4.

Tillman does exactly what he is supposed to do and sits in his coverage and reads Matt Schaub's eyes.  There is nothing else he can do except play his responsibilities.

Tampa2jpg_medium

#3 is the danger of this route combo, the post corner. Andre Johnson is already a excellent route runner combined with the flawless Play- Action the route is designed to slip through the passing of coverage by Corey Graham to Danieal Manning and be wide open.

Graham played his responsibility correctly staying with Johnson until it was time to pass him off to Manning but Manning bit on the Play-Action in #1 and was not there to take Johnson.

Tampa2jpg_medium

#4 is a Safety Net.  It is an easy throw to the TE that is between the coverages and is the second option in the combo.

It was played perfectly by us, in no place was Owen Daniels actually open in this play, Roach passed him to Tillman who stayed with him.

In this Play the reads should look something like #3,#4,#2, #1. With the #2 route opening up the #4 or vice versa. The read on this play is a no-brainer for Schuab because Andre Johnson is easily wide open by 5 yds. Which leads to a TD and seals our fate for 2008.

But as many of you are asking now. Haven't we seen this play before?

February 2007, Receiver: Reggie  Wayne, Result: TD.  Same Base D, slightly different O.

Tampa2jpg_medium

The only difference is #2, a skinny post pattern, that was run to confuse the corner and get between the coverages.   Same bite, same Result.

I am going to hearsay this but I know Riveras Brother in Law so...

Apparently, Lovie told Ron he needed to be more aggressive with the safeties. That may have been part of the reason that Manning bit on the play action or maybe it was the Skinny post the was run inside the coverage that made him bite.

 

5 recs  |  Comment 78 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Wrecked

Great post. Very informative.

by tripsevens on May 7, 2009 1:02 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Great Post

A bit beyond what I can comprehend, maybe add a YouTube vid of the play for more reference.

by GallopingGhost on May 7, 2009 1:04 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

good idea, I'll look for it

Being Who You Thought We Were Since 2005!

by Adam T on May 7, 2009 1:06 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Good luck

I tried and the only ones on YouTube are worse quality that recorded off TV and NFL.com only has the end of the play, not a whole nice look at it like I was hoping for.

by GallopingGhost on May 7, 2009 1:17 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thought about it but the Vid

only follows the ball or at least in the super bowl

I've officially adopted #94 Marcus Harrison!

by scespy12 on May 7, 2009 1:06 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

it would still help refresh the play in everybody's mind

if you have, it lets add the link

Being Who You Thought We Were Since 2005!

by Adam T on May 7, 2009 1:07 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

manning bit hard!!!

i still don’t get what happened. peanut gets a bump on him then releases him to the safety that’s not there. where’s the help???

by windycity72 on May 7, 2009 3:56 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

TWSS

Think With Your Dipstick Jimmy!

by ifuwannacrownem on May 7, 2009 4:29 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

so wrong...

so so very wrong.

by windycity72 on May 7, 2009 5:01 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Terrible to say the least

Did you see the look on Peanut’s face in the end zone? Dude!!!

"I'm not so mean. I wouldn't ever go out to hurt anybody deliberately - unless it was, you know, important, like a league game or something." - Dick Butkus

by propheteer on May 7, 2009 8:34 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

wow...

you are now officially my favorite!!! what an intense breakdown!!! thanks for the rush… i needed that. i’m soooooooo glad i joined this site. too bad you can’t pull an ESPN move and play it out on madden.

by windycity72 on May 7, 2009 1:08 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Why thank you it takes alot of effort

I ve watched the youtube vids 100 times to finally breakdown the plays

I've officially adopted #94 Marcus Harrison!

by scespy12 on May 7, 2009 1:23 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Wow

Beautiful post, man. Feel free to do more :)

As a relative newcomer to football, I haven’t really understood the 4-3 cover 2. From what I can tell, it has a lot of weaknesses.

by Mathias-K on May 7, 2009 1:23 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Not so my friend....

Read the sidebar entitled Training camp

I've officially adopted #94 Marcus Harrison!

by scespy12 on May 7, 2009 1:28 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Expect more. This is what we brought him on board for.

Feel free to drop any more thinks you’d like to see. We’ll keep them in mind.

Being Who You Thought We Were Since 2005!

by Adam T on May 7, 2009 1:28 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

i wouldn't say weaknesses...

and of course now the 3-4 is the new “black”, but the steelers wouln’t have looked that sharp if polamalu wasn’t flying around everywhere. the thing with the tampa two is that you need fast, smart, disciplined players for it to work. if you ask me, it’s one of the simpler formulas around…“stick to you assignment, don’t overplay the ball”, which is the biggest issue, and you’ll be fine.

by windycity72 on May 7, 2009 1:37 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Couldn't you say that about any defensive scheme?

The problem, as I see it, is that our players either aren’t disciplined enough or are not coached well enough to stay in their roles. One of my first football coaches used to preach to us “on defense, you don’t have to make the tacle to make the play” and that is exactly what the Bears’ players don’t understand. Switching Daniel Manning around to different positions hasn’t helped his development any and with Mike Brown out of the lineup, more often than not the last few years, we’ve had too many people in the wrong places. Not to beat a dead horse, but if the coaching staff were more consistant and tougher on the players maybe we wouldn’t have the “problems” on defense that we have. My guess is that, even though he was a former player, Rivera didn’t take any crap or excuses and that’s why we’ve gone downhill since he left.

by BearFan611 on May 7, 2009 4:03 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

you hit it right on the head...

tampa 2 thrives on gap assignments, hence the STRONG need for discipline. obviously, they’re in zone coverage, and with that being said, it looks like peanut releases johnson to play the run. one interesting thing i noticed was the commentator referring to urlacher lookin at the DBs in disbelief. as i see it, urlacher bites too, so, if in fact they’re in a base cover 2 defense as described above, urlacher should’ve ended up somewhere in centerfield…which he didn’t.

by windycity72 on May 7, 2009 4:13 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Very nice breakin it down.

If we have a rough time with our Tampa-2 defense this year, I vote we hire scespy to coach our defense or at least our db’s.

by Bears fan 4-ever!!! on May 7, 2009 1:32 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Also...

you have to be a beast on Madden.

by Bears fan 4-ever!!! on May 7, 2009 1:33 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I F'N HATE MADDEN

But I would happily coach for us though

I've officially adopted #94 Marcus Harrison!

by scespy12 on May 7, 2009 1:34 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Wow. These breakdowns turn me on...

uhh to football, that is. Go Bears! Woot!

Think With Your Dipstick Jimmy!

by ifuwannacrownem on May 7, 2009 1:34 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

don't lie

Being Who You Thought We Were Since 2005!

by Adam T on May 7, 2009 1:39 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

woo(t)???

just now noticed that the “d” is two spaces away from the “t”

by windycity72 on May 7, 2009 1:41 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

You, my friend,

are a dork. That is all…

Be nice. Flag comments that you think are offensive. Use the "reply" button. Drink plenty of water. Compliment others. Rec comments and posts you like. Don't call people names. If you don't like someone's comment, attack the comment and not the commentor. Learn the difference in your/you're, then/than, to/too. Exercise. Relax. Stretch often. Find good in the world.

by Dane Noble on May 7, 2009 1:49 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

scespy, good jorb.

NO CAN WE STOP TALKING ABOUT THE TEXANS?!

Really, next time break down a Ron Turner play that worked, or how Lovie Smith out-smarted Mike Martz, but for crying out loud…

Be nice. Flag comments that you think are offensive. Use the "reply" button. Drink plenty of water. Compliment others. Rec comments and posts you like. Don't call people names. If you don't like someone's comment, attack the comment and not the commentor. Learn the difference in your/you're, then/than, to/too. Exercise. Relax. Stretch often. Find good in the world.

by Dane Noble on May 7, 2009 1:52 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I think you have said it before Geaux,

please break down one of our infamous full back dives made popular by RT. That play never gets old.

by Bears fan 4-ever!!! on May 7, 2009 1:56 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

1- I have never said that.
and
2- Please no.

/The lack of success of that play (other than our predictability of running it) was not all on McKie. Yes, I know he can’t push the damn line, but our OLine not pushing didn’t help either.

Be nice. Flag comments that you think are offensive. Use the "reply" button. Drink plenty of water. Compliment others. Rec comments and posts you like. Don't call people names. If you don't like someone's comment, attack the comment and not the commentor. Learn the difference in your/you're, then/than, to/too. Exercise. Relax. Stretch often. Find good in the world.

by Dane Noble on May 7, 2009 2:06 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Wasn't trying to quote you...

just know how much you love the FB dive like the rest of us.

by Bears fan 4-ever!!! on May 7, 2009 4:35 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Your right, can't blame Mckie.

Dear Ron Turner, please never call for our offense to run a FB dive ever again. You see everytime you call this play, I am sure many people would like to drop a deuce right on your forehead just like me. Good lookin out and we will be watchin. Thanks, your average die hard Bear fan.

Vance A. Waggoner

by Bears fan 4-ever!!! on May 7, 2009 6:12 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

That play is easy to break down

Our offense pushes forward for a 1/2 second, then gets promptly knocked on its ass three steps backward.

by Fridge72 on May 7, 2009 8:04 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

To do that you'd have to assume

A ron turner play worked.

I've officially adopted #94 Marcus Harrison!

by scespy12 on May 7, 2009 1:58 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, maybe I put the cart before the wagon a bit there...

Be nice. Flag comments that you think are offensive. Use the "reply" button. Drink plenty of water. Compliment others. Rec comments and posts you like. Don't call people names. If you don't like someone's comment, attack the comment and not the commentor. Learn the difference in your/you're, then/than, to/too. Exercise. Relax. Stretch often. Find good in the world.

by Dane Noble on May 7, 2009 2:04 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Certainly not a card carrying member of te RT fanclub here

He has had a few moments of brilliance though. That Colts game last year was a thing of beauty. I was pretty happy with the offense during the Falcons game too. Of course there were at least 10 times, conservative estimate there, that I stood up and screamed Turner much like Shatner screamed Kahn.

The only Star Trek reference I think I will ever put on this site.

by Fridge72 on May 7, 2009 8:09 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Great analysis

I missed the season finale because it was a powder day in the mountains (had to ski). So I was surprised Lovie put DM back at FS in such an important game, but certainly the cover-2 is predicated on the safeties not “biting” on play-action.

"I'm not so mean. I wouldn't ever go out to hurt anybody deliberately - unless it was, you know, important, like a league game or something." - Dick Butkus

by propheteer on May 7, 2009 1:54 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

i'd rather see us go to a 3-3-5 to be honest.

and i think we have the personnel to do so. obviously, we’d have to be completely solid at LB, but the extra DB sure couldn’t hurt right about now… and really, that spot is interchangeable… not to mention it’s probably the best defense against the ever growing popular 4 and 5 wide sets. i’ve watched it in college games for years and have always been a fan. now that the “spread” i making it’s way into the NFL, i say let’s be pioneers!!!!

by windycity72 on May 7, 2009 2:13 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Only problem with that is we only have

maybe 2 good DBs right now.

Be nice. Flag comments that you think are offensive. Use the "reply" button. Drink plenty of water. Compliment others. Rec comments and posts you like. Don't call people names. If you don't like someone's comment, attack the comment and not the commentor. Learn the difference in your/you're, then/than, to/too. Exercise. Relax. Stretch often. Find good in the world.

by Dane Noble on May 7, 2009 2:17 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Don't provoke ifuwanna.

Be nice. Flag comments that you think are offensive. Use the "reply" button. Drink plenty of water. Compliment others. Rec comments and posts you like. Don't call people names. If you don't like someone's comment, attack the comment and not the commentor. Learn the difference in your/you're, then/than, to/too. Exercise. Relax. Stretch often. Find good in the world.

by Dane Noble on May 7, 2009 2:23 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

i was hoping our resident DC scespy would chime in.

sorry fellas… i’m a defense minded type of guy who loves the “scheme” of it all. i can stare at X’s and O’s all day!!!

by windycity72 on May 7, 2009 2:27 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sorry let me chime in...

NO. Next topic.

I've officially adopted #94 Marcus Harrison!

by scespy12 on May 7, 2009 2:51 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

WRECKED!

Because as far as we're concerned, there is still no team in the history of the NFL that could beat the '85 Bears.

by Ditkavsworld on May 7, 2009 4:30 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

but seriously...

defenses only seem to evolve after offenses have… why not get the jump on things???

by windycity72 on May 7, 2009 2:23 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

i’d rather see us go to a 3-3-5 to be honest

As a base defence? Not that we were getting much pressure on the QB with four DL, but wouldn’t they be worse (and poorer against the run) with only 3?

by Spongie on May 7, 2009 10:01 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

spongie, please read futher down...

where i idiotically misplaced my reply.

tell me what you think???

by windycity72 on May 8, 2009 12:30 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

No prob, I’ll reply down there too!

by Spongie on May 8, 2009 1:27 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

NICE!

This brings out the coach in me!

by wiltfongjr on May 7, 2009 2:48 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

i was kinda hoping

i wasn’t the only one…

by windycity72 on May 7, 2009 2:59 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

i didn't read the post to see if this was mentioned but don't forget...

what makes this play work late in the game was success at running the football.

i don’t remember how the texans were running the ball on us that day but i know for a fact that in February of 07 we were getting killed on the ground. that’s why the safeties had to bite on the play fake.

if our damned defensive line would have done their job our safeties could have stayed in position.

long story short: whomever runs the ball better almost always wins the Super Bowl (i think only once where it didn’t)

by tempchad on May 7, 2009 3:12 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Nobody

ran the ball well in XLIII. Pittsburgh had 58 yards on the ground and the Cardinals had 33. During the season, they ranked, respectively, 23rd with 105.6 ypg, and last with 73.6.

Technically, Pittsburgh did run the ball ‘better’ than Arizona and won, but they didn’t exactly do it well.

But stopping the run is also important, so kudos to both teams for that.

"It is what it is." - Bill Belichick

by 108 on May 7, 2009 3:19 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

at no point in what i typed did i say well...
“long story short: whomever runs the ball better almost always wins the Super Bowl (i think only once where it didn’t)”

by tempchad on May 7, 2009 3:36 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I had to read that comment 3 times (and reference your original comment 3 times)

before I figured out what in the hell you were trying to say.

Long story short: Use friggin apostrophies.
at no point in what i typed did i say “well”…

Be nice. Flag comments that you think are offensive. Use the "reply" button. Drink plenty of water. Compliment others. Rec comments and posts you like. Don't call people names. If you don't like someone's comment, attack the comment and not the commentor. Learn the difference in your/you're, then/than, to/too. Exercise. Relax. Stretch often. Find good in the world.

by Dane Noble on May 7, 2009 3:40 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

no. the "well" shouldn't be there

improperly edited comment.

now get off my back or will kick you in the nuts too

by tempchad on May 7, 2009 4:14 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yes, the "well" should be there.

Becuase his reply to you was “Nobody ran the ball well in XLIII.”

And your reply to him was “at no point in what i typed did i say well…”

Keep up.

Be nice. Flag comments that you think are offensive. Use the "reply" button. Drink plenty of water. Compliment others. Rec comments and posts you like. Don't call people names. If you don't like someone's comment, attack the comment and not the commentor. Learn the difference in your/you're, then/than, to/too. Exercise. Relax. Stretch often. Find good in the world.

by Dane Noble on May 7, 2009 4:17 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

yeah, whatever

i am so warming up for a old fashioned groin kick.

by tempchad on May 7, 2009 4:25 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Be nice. Flag comments that you think are offensive. Use the "reply" button. Drink plenty of water. Compliment others. Rec comments and posts you like. Don't call people names. If you don't like someone's comment, attack the comment and not the commentor. Learn the difference in your/you're, then/than, to/too. Exercise. Relax. Stretch often. Find good in the world.

by Dane Noble on May 7, 2009 4:36 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hahahahaha...

it was a GIS of “tempchad”

Be nice. Flag comments that you think are offensive. Use the "reply" button. Drink plenty of water. Compliment others. Rec comments and posts you like. Don't call people names. If you don't like someone's comment, attack the comment and not the commentor. Learn the difference in your/you're, then/than, to/too. Exercise. Relax. Stretch often. Find good in the world.

by Dane Noble on May 8, 2009 10:32 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

yeah cause GIS knows that i am bad

mother….

SHUT YO MOUTH!

what? i was just talking about tempchad

by tempchad on May 8, 2009 1:02 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I thought

’ = apostrophy
and
" = quotation mark

perhaps I have to breakdown and purchase the WCG Blog’s Book of the English language, sentence structure and grammar or I’m way behind on my interweb lingo.

/sarc.

Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in an attractive and well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways - Beer in one hand - brat in the other - body thoroughly used up, totally worn out and screaming 'WOO HOO, What a Ride

by icarr0331 on May 7, 2009 9:19 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Bite me.

Be nice. Flag comments that you think are offensive. Use the "reply" button. Drink plenty of water. Compliment others. Rec comments and posts you like. Don't call people names. If you don't like someone's comment, attack the comment and not the commentor. Learn the difference in your/you're, then/than, to/too. Exercise. Relax. Stretch often. Find good in the world.

by Dane Noble on May 7, 2009 9:33 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Great post

Any chance you could summarise the strengths and weaknesses of this scheme for those of us who don’t have the in-depth knowledge? E.g. given that it’s essentially a zone defence, is its basic philosophy to trade territory while preventing the big play, in the hopes that it can force a punt / turnover? Is the purpose of the zone coverage to freeze out the QB’s options and allow the pass rush to get to him? How have offenses evolved to attack the scheme, other than the play action?

by Spongie on May 7, 2009 10:08 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Very Nice Breakdown...

Don’t mean to nitpick but would like to clear up some discrepancies between your analysis of the play and the video.

Firstly, it is Tillman who is on the left side covering Johnson (#3 in your breakdown) and Graham on the right covering the other WR in the slot. There is no WR split wide right. Also, the FB and RB break to the left not the right. As you point out, the CB covering Johnson (Tillman not Graham) did his job in staying with the receiver until he left his zone and then dropped him to the safety, Manning. Tillman did not drop off because he bit on the play action but rather because he had responsibility for covering the receivers who were coming into his zone (primarily the FB who was wide open in the flat.) As for those who think Urlacher “bit.” On the Play action, well, in an I formation he stayed in his gap until he saw that it was a passing play and then he quickly backpedaled into his mid-zone area where he took away the angle on the slot receiver who had a step on Graham on a slant.

Anyway, your key point is very valid: Manning, because he bit on the play action was not there to cover his zone. I’d also say, however, that Tillman did nothing to slow Johnson down. He was playing him on the line but if you watch the video he definitely should have been able to bump him within the first 5 yards. That would have slowed Johnson down and allowed Manning to recover a few steps from his bight on the play action.

by The Kaiser on May 8, 2009 5:58 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

there is a lame attempt at a jam...

but then he releases him like he was supposed to. wheter he got the bump or not, there was supposed to be help over the top. brian urlacher absolutely bites(watch it slow or pause alot), he’s way out of position… now the only reason why i want to stress that is because(once again, in either slo-mo, or freeze frame), it “appears” that manning motions for a split second towards urlacher’s assignment, then switches his full attention to johnson, albeit too late.

by windycity72 on May 8, 2009 9:03 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't see that at all...

Urlacher drops back to cover the angle on the slot receiver who is running a slant over the middle. The only hint of a motion towards an assigment is Briggs pointing towards Johnson and Tillman as if he knows the play call. On the isolated camera shot in the replay, you’ll see that as Tillman let’s Johnson run right by, Manning appears in the screen running way up after biting on the run. There is no hint that Manning for a second montions to Urlacher’s assignment or that he is anywhere near trying to pick up or support that assigment.

by The Kaiser on May 8, 2009 10:08 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

i promise we'll get into this...

just won’t be able to pull this off at work. i know, i know… how could they possibly expect me to concentrate on my post when i’m here??? but anyways, that convo is the stuff that i thrive on!! i’ve got a ten, two off suit, but i’m goin all in!!!

by windycity72 on May 8, 2009 11:21 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

so, as i was going thru my file..

i came an article that explains, almost to the “T”, why it would be effective for the bears D… sounds sad to some, i know, that i would have files on such a thing… some will understand.
but i LOVE this game! my all-time, if i could have the perfect job, scenario would be coaching/scouting. anyways, enough of the rant…let’s get down to business. sorry, don’t know how to do the “clickety pop” thing so this is the best i can do for now. i promise i’ll e-mail one of the top dawgs, so as to not put them thru the agony of trying to explain it… yet again.

http://newsok.com/article/3186029/1198850896

lmost as if you insert “bears” wherever “mountaineers” is metioned. notice the comment about the deficiency at DT. earlier, they mention the safeties playing alongside the LBs. it’s no secret that our team is “chock” full of SSs. but notice the second portion of the article. apparently it’s effective against the run. obviously, it’s a base package, and every team in the NFL will have variations of packages, and even go from a 4-3, to a 3-4, and vise versa if the offensive lineup calls for it. so what do you think? did i get to to budge even a little bit?

by windycity72 on May 8, 2009 12:23 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

wow... i screwed up big time,

this was supposed to go into another post. my truest, sincerest apologies to everybody that had to read that. i feel like a fool.

by windycity72 on May 8, 2009 12:26 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Aha, I see, so it’s more of a 3-5-3 where the safeties push up to the LBs, and they can add blitzers from anywhere. My worry with this scheme for the Bears would be that we blitzed a lot more than most in the league last year to compensate for the lack of pressure from the front 4, and still didn’t get to the QB much… but that would be a problem for any scheme, really.

by Spongie on May 8, 2009 1:34 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

absolutely true...

and regardless of the scheme, the middle of the D(i.e., NT, MLB, S) is crucial in any line up. i was just trying to figure a way to utilize our strengths/defeciencies on D, and our current roster, to it’s fullest potential. and again, it would only be our base D. i don’t know why, but i’m fascinated with this defense, and i really think this will give teams a “1 up” on opposing offenses with the spread now being introduced into the NFL.

by windycity72 on May 8, 2009 1:45 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Send it to me.

My email is in my profile… That’s my dept.

I've officially adopted #94 Marcus Harrison!

by scespy12 on May 8, 2009 3:37 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome Grabowskis, to SB Nation's blog about everything Chicago Bears.

Community Guidelines
Start posting about the Bears »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Chicago-bears-logo_small
I Got this Backer's Back
Dsc01037_small
PhotoShop Contest: Pat Mannelly
Dsc01037_small
WCG Community Updates (Updated again)
3961055499_e489f15bb2_o_small
Random Thoughts From Week Nine

Recent FanPosts

Mug_adebisi_small
"Arc"
Ditkaworld_small
I'm 3D- Disgusted, Dejected and Disappointed
Blake_again_small
I Predict............Week 11 Philadelphia @ Bears.
Bears_small
When you go to the flea market, it's all about planning.
Mug_adebisi_small
This has been the plan all along.
N506182155_6296_small
Bears 2010 schedule released.
Blake_again_small
Garrett Wolfe Out For the Year (Updated)
Bears2_small
Key Player to keep an eye on: LeSean McCoy
Bears2_small
Years of neglecting the Offensive Line finally catching up with Angelo

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

Arrowhead Pride
Arrowheadlines: Chiefs News 11/23
Buc 'Em
BUCSHOTS! The Hows and Whys about your Buccaneers.
Niners Nation
Golden Nuggets: Worse than a blowout

SPONSORS


General Manager/ Head Coach

Windycity_small Adam T

Dsc01037_small Dane Noble

Position Coaches

Evalltheway_small SackMan

Briggsie_small ChiFan13

Leelee_n_laylor_bff wiltfongjr