Who Made Who?

It is one of those things that we really don’t know yet… but it will certainly be worked out this year whether Cutler can transform average WRs into good ones.

Only thing… you think Olsen getting 100 grabs is a possibility?

Who made who, who made you?
If you made them and they made you
Who picked up the bill, and who made who?

A little AC/DC for you.

it’s the Quarterback. the QB is what makes the recievers. History forever shows just that. A WR has never been the biggest reason that a championship team has won a superbowl.
There’s a lot more HOF or HOF potential WRs who’s never won a ring than QBs.

scrap heap receivers. I don’t know of any other names that have been mentioned in relation to the Bears recently.

you can’t make chicken soup out of chicken crap

Well, you can… but no-one will want to drink your chicken crap soup!

Wait, what we were talking about again?

i like the idea that if your such a great threat in the pocket your running game improves.forte becomes a pro-bowl player.

I don’t think we need to bring in the Burress or Boldin headaches. I believe we will be good with Hester, Iglesias and Bennett.

In Denver Cutler took two average college receivers and turned them into good NFL receivers. Yes, I’m talking about Marshall and Royal. Both Iglesias and Bennett had much better college careers and should carry that over to the NFL with a QB like Cutler.

In 2-3 years we’ll have one of the most dangerous receiving corps in the league. Not to mention Forte or Oslen.

if the QB can make the throws and is accurate most of the time, the WR’s will go after the “below average” throws with more effort. If the WR catches everything thrown his way, the QB is more likely to take the chance in “tight” situations. I really think it goes hand in hand. Except for Rashied, who, unless a St. Bernard comes running up to him with a football strapped around his neck and gives it to him, won’t hang onto anything.

There’s no question that Cutler made all of them better, but all of them also have good skill sets.

But you cant say we would be better off without a guy like Plaxico or Boldin. Its true great quarterbacks can still succeed without the greatest wide receivers ever. i.e. Dan Marino, Drew Brees, and even Tom Brady and his 3 Super Bowl Championships seasons. Deion Branch is o.k. but HOF Im not sure. I love the optimism but to say Bennett or Iglesias WILL become a favorite target is a little bit of a stretch. If it happens great, but I would feel alot better about the passing attack and even the progression of Devin Hester if we had a proven commodity like Burress SB Champ, or Boldin SB Runner Up, or on the lesser side a Matt Jones. But one thing all those WRs have in common is SIZE which none of our guys have maybe besides Brandon Rideau. Its a roll of the dice to have a receiver with no catches in the NFL to play opposite of Hester who is inexperienced at the position to begin with. It would help alot more with someone to take the attention away from him so hester can progress like we want him to.

Boldin would have to be picked from a trade, and I’d be OK with that… and I don’t see any way Angelo persues Plax, too much drama… and there are no FA wideouts that intrigue me

Interesting, but didn’t Angelo make an offer to the Cards, and was turned down, obviously we didn’t have what they wanted in exchange for Boldin. We have a QB now let’s see what our recievers can do, and if niether of them really make a big impact we can address the WR issue next year. But we do have a solid running game, and 2 good TE’s as weapons for Cutler, if our defense can hold up we should have a great season, I think 12-4, NFC North Champs, and anything is possible in the playoffs.