Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Kobe Bryant Will Never Top Michael Jordan

Can Jay Cutler read a defense?

I'm starting to wonder.  Last year running the offense of the unimaginative Ron Turner, Jay Cutler threw a ton of picks.  A league leading twenty-six to be precise.  The same Turner offense that Kyle Orton was able to game manage his way into some ball securing success.  But to be fair it was also the offense that gunslinger Rex Grossman was able to throw 20 picks of his own in 2006.  But Jay Cutler is a better QB than Sexy Rexy, isn't he?

Last season a lot was written about where to place the blame for all those picks - on the receivers for not running the right routes, the offensive line for leaving Cutler shell shocked, or on Jay for simply throwing into coverage.  What if the marriage between the Mike Shanahan offense and Jay Cutler, with it's roll outs, moving pocket, and play action passes was perfect because it limited how much of the field Cutler had to read?  Just because Cutler has a full grasp of the complicated Mike Martz offense, that doesn't necessarily mean to he'll be able to execute it.

Star-divide

In theory, Mike Martz would be perfect for the gunslinger mentality of Jay Cutler.  Who better to guide the confident and cocksure young signal caller than the confident and cocky offensive coordinator.  They seem to get along just fine, even gushing over the brilliance of each other on more than one occasion.  But diagramming plays on the chalkboard is different than actually taking that 7 step drop, reading the safety or safeties, checking linebacker depth, feeling the blitz, checking the leverage of the corner, hitting the hot route...  etc. etc. etc...

I'm not even going to get into his individual success in college.  Honestly I don't even know what style of offense they ran at Vanderbilt.  It doesn't matter.  Throughout the history of the NCAA there have been plenty of great college quarterbacks that have no problem reading a college defense, only to fail in making the transition to the much quicker pace of the NFL game.  Maybe reading the entire field at the NFL level is too much?  Maybe being drafted to run Shanahan's O was the perfect scenario for Cutler and maybe Mike Shanahan knew exactly what he was doing when he drafted Cutler.  And maybe Jerry Angelo made a mistake in his talent evaluation of Cutler, and an even bigger mistake is not putting him with the type of offense he's had success in.

As a fan, I really hope I'm wrong, and that the offense is close to having everyone on the same page.  But the body of work from Cutler is starting to tell me otherwise.  He has a freakishly strong arm and good mobility, and in the right system he can play at a Pro Bowl level.  He's done it before, but can he do it again?

The Bears have their bye week at the perfect time.  If Mike Martz can't go through his voluminous playbook and find something that works or create some new pages for it that better fit the talents of his players, the season will be lost.  He has the football know-how to do anything he sets his mind to and he's shown the ability to adapt in the few games we've seen in 2010.  But is he too stubborn to make wholesale alterations to his game plans?

Comment 270 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

All four picks on Sunday

he had perfect protection. What’s your retort on that fact?

"How do you know somebody is great? When you see how they respond to adversity. Anybody can man a ship when the waters are calm." - Jerry Angelo

by propheteer on Oct 26, 2010 11:18 AM CDT up reply actions  

I guess he should just retire then

and feel sorry for himself, or just pretend he’s a NFL QB. Have you seen the hits on other QBs around the league this season? I understand he’s been hit a lot and under severe pressure, but he’s got to make positive plays when he has time.

"How do you know somebody is great? When you see how they respond to adversity. Anybody can man a ship when the waters are calm." - Jerry Angelo

by propheteer on Oct 26, 2010 11:32 AM CDT up reply actions  

I predict

Cutler and the Bears will play better after the bye.

by MEATaylor on Oct 26, 2010 11:37 AM CDT up reply actions  

Nope.

The bears have given up 10 more sacks than the 2nd worst team (pretty much just the giants game is the difference).

However in 09 Aaron Rodgers led the league in sacks and Ben Roethlisberger was 2nd with 51 and 50 respectively and they did fantastic.

by lopey986 on Oct 26, 2010 12:13 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

So true

So true

So true

One time while a young lad, someone made fun of the Ditka name. One time.

by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Oct 26, 2010 12:44 PM CDT up reply actions   2 recs

Lee is a decent TE too

(Sing song)...Everybody Hates Rondo...

by T.Moore on Oct 26, 2010 12:52 PM CDT up reply actions  

there are sacks

because a QB holds onto the ball too long

and there are sacks because the offensive line gets beat too quickly

my guess is you’d find more of the former with Rodgers and Big Ben those years and more of the latter with Cutler this year

follow me on twitter for fantasy sports analysis @http://twitter.com/DrewDinkmeyer or get the full analysis at www.fantistics.com

by DartmouthCubsFan on Oct 26, 2010 1:13 PM CDT up reply actions  

I know Knox took the blame for the slant by some people

But you do not throw the slant if the DB is playing with inside leverage. Hall was clearly playing to take away the slant, Cutler should have seen that and went to another receiver.

One time while a young lad, someone made fun of the Ditka name. One time.

by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Oct 27, 2010 8:27 AM CDT up reply actions  

They played good against an agressive skins D

What was cutler sacked, 3 times? Once was because he ran into the back of Williams and Williams was pushed back onto cutler. Another was because cutler ran into the back of williams but was able to bounce out of the pocket only to do what he always does, run right into a waiting linebacker instead of throwing the ball out of bounds.

Cutler has a lot of problems and martz has never shown the ability to help a qb mature outside of Warner and I feel like Warner was just that good and that martz had very little to do with that.

Heres a short list of cutlers problems:
Doesn’t check down.
Doesn’t throw the ball away.
Takes too many unnecessary sacks.
Tries to brittfar every pass between 2 defenders.
Throws the ball up in the air 40 yards downfield to guys like Knox and Hester who outsize absolutely no defenders (remember he had Brandon Marshall who is a huge target and who can go up and win a jumpball and muscle balls away from dbacks, but hester and Knox cannot and will not ever be able to do that due to physical limitations.
And the single biggest thing I’ve come to dislike, the way Cutler carries himself on the field and the sideline. I know things are bad, I know the offense just cannot get anything going and he is getting hit early and often (sometimes his own fault, sometimes the lines) but I want a qb who is gonna rally his teammates around him. I want a qb who is on the sidelines talking to his coaches and receivers and lineman trying to come up with something to get things going. When things are going bad cutler walks to the sideline and sits on the end of the bench, usually by himself and stares between his knees and sulks until it’s time to go back on the field. I wish the bears had a coach who would tear his ass up (cowher comes to mind) and who would make him either pull his head out his ass or make it very clear he will be looking for a job somewhere else, alas we do not have a single coach on this staff who will do that, they all want to be buddy buddy with all their employees.

by lopey986 on Oct 26, 2010 11:26 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions   1 recs

Those deficiencies are the difference

between being a good starting QB in this league and finding a second career. He thinks he’s entitled or something, I haven’t really figured out what it is. He’s certainly an enigma.

"How do you know somebody is great? When you see how they respond to adversity. Anybody can man a ship when the waters are calm." - Jerry Angelo

by propheteer on Oct 26, 2010 11:34 AM CDT up reply actions  

i agree w/ everything u said...

…but how he carries himself on the fiend/sidelines really doesnt matter to me. He’s been getting killed out there this season so far…and its waaaay past trying to “fire up” your OL to block for you when u know they arent/can’t. I dont blame the guy…

Also, maybe Jay just isn’t a “leader-type” player. I know 90% of the NFL teams their QB’s are leaders/captains, but does it really matter? I prolly can guess that Olin is the “leader” on offense anyway…

by Rampage997 on Oct 26, 2010 12:02 PM CDT up reply actions  

It bothers me and i think it matters.

No other position is relied on as heavily as the qb. The wide receivers, tight ends and running backs success all directly correlate with the success of the qb. The 5 guys in front of you have to feel like when they are blocking their asses off you arent going to throw them under the bus and you are going to make plays when they manage to hold the line for you.

And the biggest issue I have with it is when most qb’s hit the sidelines (especially the good ones) they are in constant contact with everyone around them and are looking at printouts of the previous drive and talking to their receivers about what routes are working and talking with their line about where the blitzes are coming from and what guy needs extra attention. I dont see any of that from cutler when games are going to shit. When things are great I see it, but the minute things get tough he sits alone on the bench and stares blankly at the ground. Not a good sign of a qb who has a desire to be the best or even one of the best.

by lopey986 on Oct 26, 2010 12:18 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

agree to disagree..

I know the QB is the most important position on offense and responsible for a lot, but why does he hafta be the leader? In my opinion, anyone on offense can be a leader. A WR, OL, RB, etc, can know every play in the playbook and know where everyone is suppose to line up. In order to be a QB, u dont hafta be a leader or vice versa, but that’s my opinion…

I do agree w/ you about him not doing his research on the sidelines though. I have seen on the sidelines where Cutler isn’t looking at pictures or he’ll look at a couple then go off in the distance away from everyone. He needs to talk to his OL or WR’s at least a little bit if something happens thats out of the ordinary to be on the same page. Everyone is different. People handle things differently. Obviously, Jay chooses his way….to be distant.

by Rampage997 on Oct 26, 2010 12:40 PM CDT up reply actions  

Because plays are relayed through the qb

And the qb relays the plays to the guys in the huddle and the qb reads the defense while lining up under the center, you can’t very well expect a lineman, rb or wr to read the defense and relay that to the qb or something.

The qb has to be the most knowledgable guy on the offense and has to be the one who tells all the other guys on the field how things are gonna go, that’s just the way it is. There are a crap ton of physically gifted guys who just couldn’t handle the role of being the quarterback. Being a loner is not conducive to being a good qb.

by lopey986 on Oct 26, 2010 1:15 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

I know a lot of responsibility falls on the QB’s shoulders, which is why you want your QB as the leader/captain, I get that. But my arguement is QB’s don’t have to be leaders on a team. Some ppl arent born leaders or just choose not to lead. In my opinion, Cutler isnt that great of a leader, due to some of his actions, expressions, etc. and I feel he doesnt hafta be the leader either. He can still do everything that a normal NFL QB does every game (read defenses, relay plays, etc) while not being the leader. I just dont know why since he’s the QB, he hasta be the leader/captain by default…

by Rampage997 on Oct 26, 2010 2:12 PM CDT up reply actions  

BOOM!

One time while a young lad, someone made fun of the Ditka name. One time.

by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Oct 26, 2010 11:27 AM CDT up reply actions  

You'd better believe it

This issue has become black and white, when it should be a shade of gray. It’s not all Cutler’s fault, but you can’t say he doesn’t deserve any blame.

I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.

by Topher Doll on Oct 27, 2010 12:09 PM CDT up reply actions  

I've Read Somewhere

That veterans who played on Martz’ offense said that they needed at least two years in order to execute his complex schemes properly- I think that may be a factor in that Martz has given Jay Cutler too much responsibility right away. This coupled with a horrible offensive line, and inexperienced receivers has made a mockery of the Bears’ offense.

by Gaak on Oct 26, 2010 11:17 AM CDT reply actions  

+1000

I have said this before. Did we not think Jay’s decision making along with a brand new scheme was not going to have dysfunctional problems form time to time? The Historically bad Oline is exasperated this problem by 10×.

"We were freaking robbed!! Our defense totally dominated all day! What? we gave up nearly 500 yards on defense? Yeah but we stopped them on the 1 yrd line! Our D is awesome!!"

- Entire kool aid drinkin' Pride of Detroit site-

by tfrabotta on Oct 26, 2010 12:52 PM CDT up reply actions  

My answer

No, he can’t read a defense or make the proper adjustments. He refuses to take what the defense gives him.

Hall getting four picks against him on Sunday is a prime example. He baited him to test him and won bigtime; he even gave Jay the opportunity to go deep on him cause he was jumping almost every route.

I hope I’m wrong about him, but I’m officially off his bandwagon after Sunday.

"How do you know somebody is great? When you see how they respond to adversity. Anybody can man a ship when the waters are calm." - Jerry Angelo

by propheteer on Oct 26, 2010 11:17 AM CDT reply actions  

Jay Did Pretty good

against GB and Dallas so I cant say he’s hopeless.

by Gaak on Oct 26, 2010 11:23 AM CDT up reply actions  

Dallas and Green Bay

Have got no pressure on opposing teams qb’s this year. It didn’t take long for teams to figure out that sending 1 or 2 extra guys is going to mess cutler up and now everyone is doing it.

Reminds me of when Ron Rivera left the bears and they played the next year and he told all of his players in san Diego that if you rattle grossman early he will crumble because he is a mental midget. Seems eerily similar in that teams realized sending extra blitzers would make grossman make huge mistakes and we are dealing with the same thing since the giants showed what would happen to the bears offense if you throw extra blitzers at them. Whether the line is missing a blitzer or cutler is panicking and running out of the pocket and into a linebacker it is getting results and will continue to.

by lopey986 on Oct 26, 2010 11:31 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

green bay

is 4 th in the NFL in sacks and has the NFL defensive player of the year according to most NFL “experts” I see and hear…..dallas was killing Cutler that first qtr and I seem to remember everyone cheering up and down at how Cutler was reading where the blitz was coming from and finding hot reads in the dallas game…..

That's it! See, at first I thought it was hate, too. Hate was all I knew, it built my world, it imprisoned me, taught me how to eat, how to drink, how to breathe. I thought I'd die with all my hate in my veins. But I realized it was loathing.

-Mike Martz describes his feelings on running the football

by CloudyFuture on Oct 26, 2010 11:35 AM CDT up reply actions  

You haven't read much lately then.

Yes Dallas got pressure early and the bears made adjustments, it was nothing short of a miracle and was gone as quick as it came. I haven’t seen any in game adjustments made since that game.

And as far as green bay goes, Woodson is having a terrible year, there is even talk of moving him back to safety because he leads the league in defensive pass interference penalties because he can’t cover anyone anymore.

by lopey986 on Oct 26, 2010 11:42 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

Is the adjustment

not on martz as well then for not realizing that Cutler is playing poorly and putting all the pressure on Cutler by passing roughly 75% of the time and not running the ball ? In fact that might be Cutler’s problem he just can not carry a team like rodgers, manning(s), brady…..

As for green bay you stated that they get no pressure on the QB but I stated they have the 4th most sacks in the NFL. Not sure where woodson falls into that. the injuries now (lost 2 more to injury on defense for the season) that I can see……

That's it! See, at first I thought it was hate, too. Hate was all I knew, it built my world, it imprisoned me, taught me how to eat, how to drink, how to breathe. I thought I'd die with all my hate in my veins. But I realized it was loathing.

-Mike Martz describes his feelings on running the football

by CloudyFuture on Oct 26, 2010 12:02 PM CDT up reply actions  

When you said the frontrunner for DPOY

You were talking about Matthews right? I havent heard anything about Woodson all seaon except for the fact he complains after every Pass Interference call he gets these days.

by Chitownproduct on Oct 26, 2010 12:43 PM CDT up reply actions  

Ah

yes doh didnt know that is what loopey meant….Thanks….Ya meant matthews….You kow the greatest LB ever to play the game as dubbed by ESPN and Fox after the 3rd week of the season…..

That's it! See, at first I thought it was hate, too. Hate was all I knew, it built my world, it imprisoned me, taught me how to eat, how to drink, how to breathe. I thought I'd die with all my hate in my veins. But I realized it was loathing.

-Mike Martz describes his feelings on running the football

by CloudyFuture on Oct 26, 2010 12:47 PM CDT up reply actions  

Ops

lopey….didnt mean to misspell your name….

That's it! See, at first I thought it was hate, too. Hate was all I knew, it built my world, it imprisoned me, taught me how to eat, how to drink, how to breathe. I thought I'd die with all my hate in my veins. But I realized it was loathing.

-Mike Martz describes his feelings on running the football

by CloudyFuture on Oct 26, 2010 12:59 PM CDT up reply actions  

you ain't lying

The way ESPN AND NFL Network talk about him you would think someone spliced Bruce Smith/Reggie White/ and LT’s DNA together and made a super soldier.

Even though for some odd reason…he does seem a bit more intense then Jared Allen. Maybe it’s just me.

by Chitownproduct on Oct 26, 2010 1:07 PM CDT up reply actions  

That's

“The Bloodline” which is a neat nickname if your in the WWE

by KyCubsFan on Oct 26, 2010 3:27 PM CDT up reply actions  

It certainly is

But martz has been around forever and expecting things to be different this time around with him seems a little silly. He had 2 great years with st Louis and that’s it, but he has a ring so he’s supposed to be some offensive genius.

by lopey986 on Oct 26, 2010 1:03 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

Jay made poor decisions no doubt

but if our wr had half a brain and were not so lazy on there routes a couple of them could have been receptions instead of them standing around waiting for the ball. I said it before, Hester + Knox = IQ of 39..

"We were freaking robbed!! Our defense totally dominated all day! What? we gave up nearly 500 yards on defense? Yeah but we stopped them on the 1 yrd line! Our D is awesome!!"

- Entire kool aid drinkin' Pride of Detroit site-

by tfrabotta on Oct 26, 2010 12:53 PM CDT up reply actions  

Like you, I have no idea what offense he ran in college but my guess is his success had less to do with

the system than his pure physical ability to make throws that most college players could not defend against. It’s like Reggie Bush or Vince Young or even Michael Vick. In college, great athletes can impact games because they might only go up against 1 or 2 players of their caliber in any given week but in the NFL, you go up against an entire team.

I can’t say Jay can’t read defenses, it just seems like he doesn’t try. To me, it seems like he thinks he can still force the ball in situations that worked in college but rarely work at this level. I mentioned in another post that he also takes too long to recognize that his primary is covered so by the time he gets to his second option, that receiver is ether covered or the rush is getting to him. It’s not to absolve our O-line at all but I really believe that a large number of the sacks he’s taken might have been avoided with better recognition and willingness to check down.

by BearFan611 on Oct 26, 2010 11:35 AM CDT reply actions   1 recs

This;
I mentioned in another post that he also takes too long to recognize that his primary is covered so by the time he gets to his second option, that receiver is ether covered or the rush is getting to him.

Is failing to read a defense

One time while a young lad, someone made fun of the Ditka name. One time.

by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Oct 26, 2010 11:38 AM CDT up reply actions  

I think it's a combo of the two

He believe’s he can make the throw even though a receiver is well-covered, and also refuses or can’t identify his second option in a timely manner.

"How do you know somebody is great? When you see how they respond to adversity. Anybody can man a ship when the waters are calm." - Jerry Angelo

by propheteer on Oct 26, 2010 12:11 PM CDT up reply actions  

Is not one of the hallmarks

of the mike martz offense is no audibles. You run the plays I tell you to run because I have a Super Bowl ring and you dont ? ….. Wonder how much that would affect play….Course some of those throws and reads just leave you scratching your heads even going back to last season……

That's it! See, at first I thought it was hate, too. Hate was all I knew, it built my world, it imprisoned me, taught me how to eat, how to drink, how to breathe. I thought I'd die with all my hate in my veins. But I realized it was loathing.

-Mike Martz describes his feelings on running the football

by CloudyFuture on Oct 26, 2010 11:38 AM CDT reply actions  

this blows my mind sometimes

especially in an era where defenses are scheming the crap out of offenses … a lot of coverage changes and disguises. Calling an audible isn’t a bad thing sometimes.

by junkhorse on Oct 26, 2010 11:41 AM CDT up reply actions  

Audibles/adjustments

are built into the system. It’s not like Martz doesn’t account for changes in the defenses calls, but rather trusts his QBs to make the proper read/adjustments.

"How do you know somebody is great? When you see how they respond to adversity. Anybody can man a ship when the waters are calm." - Jerry Angelo

by propheteer on Oct 26, 2010 12:12 PM CDT up reply actions  

BINGO!

One time while a young lad, someone made fun of the Ditka name. One time.

by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Oct 26, 2010 12:13 PM CDT up reply actions  

Really

I have never heard that from the various Chicago media….All I read / hear is about ripping on martz for on the audible thing….Especially lately….So dunno….

That's it! See, at first I thought it was hate, too. Hate was all I knew, it built my world, it imprisoned me, taught me how to eat, how to drink, how to breathe. I thought I'd die with all my hate in my veins. But I realized it was loathing.

-Mike Martz describes his feelings on running the football

by CloudyFuture on Oct 26, 2010 12:39 PM CDT up reply actions  

I heard it from Chester Taylor

after the Seahawks game via espnchicago bears blog.

"How do you know somebody is great? When you see how they respond to adversity. Anybody can man a ship when the waters are calm." - Jerry Angelo

by propheteer on Oct 26, 2010 12:53 PM CDT up reply actions  

Every Martz play is designed to have a positive read

based on the look the defense gives…

One time while a young lad, someone made fun of the Ditka name. One time.

by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Oct 26, 2010 1:04 PM CDT up reply actions  

It would just help if

They would get the damn play in on time.

by KyCubsFan on Oct 26, 2010 3:29 PM CDT up reply actions  

Thats what we keep hearing

Something is not working or everything is not working. Whatever Martz’s system has in place needs changed. Whether it is allowing Cutler to audible at the line or some communication as to what the read on the D is. Something to help the offense get in the same page.

by TheMan1 on Oct 26, 2010 9:58 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

Heres another issue that no one .......

…… seems to remember or care about ….. this is Jays second offense in his second year with us . There are gonna be growing pains . Look at guys like Peyton Manning & Tom Brady , these guys have been the the same offense their entire career & have had the time to learn it inside out . So really cut Jay some friggin slack will ya .

" Everyone has a plan 'till they get punched in the mouth. " ~
Mike Tyson

by MidWayMonster54 on Oct 26, 2010 1:21 PM CDT up reply actions  

it is a problem i agree

unfortunately he better get used to it because its going to be a revolving door of coaches and coordinators

by lopey986 on Oct 26, 2010 4:53 PM CDT up reply actions  

How long does Lovie have left on his contract?

Was this the last year, or does he technically have one more year after this?

I ask only because, given the time it is known to take to get into a Martz offense, if Lovie and company have another year left, I can see them being given one more season.

by Virto on Oct 26, 2010 5:47 PM CDT up reply actions  

What a perfect way to alienate their fanbase

Of course the McCaskeys will do just that.

Thanks. Now I’m really depressed.

Nobody who ever gave his best regretted it. -George Halas

by Allie on Oct 26, 2010 5:49 PM CDT up reply actions  

Lovie has one more year

Angelo has 2 from what I have read. Who knows what Ruskell was guaranteed?

by TheMan1 on Oct 26, 2010 10:00 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

Ruskell was signed for two years, I recall reading when he came here. This was mentioned as being significant because it hinted that, come what may, Jerry would be here for those two years.

After reading that, I went out to look for a baby to punch.

"44 years of football history and nothing to show for it. I wish I wasn’t banned at the Norseman.." - tfrabotta
"Fellas, what are they, unblockable? Is that the '85 Bears over there?" - Tom Coughlin, Giants '06 training camp
~~~ Check my profile for links for SB20 and America's Game: '85 Bears ~~~

by Spongie on Oct 27, 2010 12:51 AM CDT up reply actions  

Might I suggest Mr and Mrs Angelo's baby as the target....

or, even better, Mr and Mrs McCaskey’s oldest “baby”, Michael. Actually, if you can arrange that, I’d like to take a few shots as well so keep me informed.

by BearFan611 on Oct 27, 2010 9:42 AM CDT up reply actions  

Roll the pocket

it’s an idea that’s been kicked around as often as Jay’s been by opposing defenses this year. I think it would work if there was a pocket to roll. Yes, I know Jay has had protection and he’s fired the perfect INT, but he’s one of those guys who likes to throw off his back foot or on the run. It seems the more unorthodox the style the better he is. He’s not your Tom Brady-like stand in the pocket and pick apart the defense style passer.

That said – I don’t know that Jay recognizes what he’s got in front of him. To me it looks like he’s got a receiver in mind the minute he breaks the huddle. This might be for two reasons – 1) he’s got his timing down with that receiver (Knox) or 2) he’s got no time to decide back there and it’s either that guy or nothing.

I think if Martz can find a way to buy him time it’s going to be to both of their advantages. Quick reads – quick decisions. Jay has got to check down though if it’s not there and if the check down is gone – start running or throw it away. It can’t be all or nothing if the first read is covered. He’s got good mobility – use it. Get him moving and give him the ability to make plays with his legs AND arm.

by junkhorse on Oct 26, 2010 11:39 AM CDT reply actions  

The problem is that it is all or nothing.

From the second the ball is snapped cutler is looking for 1 receiver and if that guy is covered he either a) freaks out and throws the ball to him anyway resulting in a turnover or near turnover or b) freaks out and runs into a lineman and then runs into a linebacker waiting for him at the line of scrimmage while everyone is watching forte run across the field uncovered 5-10 yards away screaming for him to dump it off.

by lopey986 on Oct 26, 2010 11:47 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

From my understanding martz offense is not

about quick reads / quick decisions or even necessarily getting first downs….Its about gaining 20 to 30 yards on every play no matter what….I think that might be why Cutler holds on to the ball to long because his primary target in the martz offense is 20 yards down field so Cutler might have to wait for that receiver before even going to the second option but by then his O line either falls apart or he is thinking it will….that does not excuse the INTs just my thoughts on this….

To me this season is a wash though since I just do not trust martz and his offense….

That's it! See, at first I thought it was hate, too. Hate was all I knew, it built my world, it imprisoned me, taught me how to eat, how to drink, how to breathe. I thought I'd die with all my hate in my veins. But I realized it was loathing.

-Mike Martz describes his feelings on running the football

by CloudyFuture on Oct 26, 2010 12:11 PM CDT up reply actions  

Martz would like to get a big chunk of yards each play

But that’s not exactly what his philosophy is.

Stretch the field and hit the deep ball on occasion, but also the dig routes and the crossing routes that open up due to the field being stretched.

One time while a young lad, someone made fun of the Ditka name. One time.

by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Oct 26, 2010 12:16 PM CDT up reply actions  

Ah Thank you

for that….I am a laymen (or a what some people call a “Maddenite”) and basically just go off what I hear / read and try to come off what I see sometimes off what I see so I can post on my frustrations after my favorite team started off well and has now gone in the crapper and now some calling it the worse team in the NFL with the worse O line in the history of the NFL……

That's it! See, at first I thought it was hate, too. Hate was all I knew, it built my world, it imprisoned me, taught me how to eat, how to drink, how to breathe. I thought I'd die with all my hate in my veins. But I realized it was loathing.

-Mike Martz describes his feelings on running the football

by CloudyFuture on Oct 26, 2010 12:43 PM CDT up reply actions  

The Bills, sir.

The Bills.

If I did what I love for a living, what would I do in my free time?

Writer at windycitygridiron.com {-/-} http://www.twitter.com/kdoggers

by Kev H on Oct 26, 2010 1:13 PM CDT up reply actions  

I wonder how much of the problem is not having a big guy to throw to as a default.

When he’s not seeing anything else, tossing it somewhere that only a 6’4" or taller receiver has a shot.

by oripunk3485 on Oct 26, 2010 11:59 AM CDT reply actions  

A big fella would help

but it’s not a necessity for the offense to work. I’m sure Cutler would like that go get it type of receiver for when he chucks it down field into coverage

One time while a young lad, someone made fun of the Ditka name. One time.

by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Oct 26, 2010 12:17 PM CDT up reply actions  

Here's an idea

When he’s not seeing anything else…throw it away.

If I did what I love for a living, what would I do in my free time?

Writer at windycitygridiron.com {-/-} http://www.twitter.com/kdoggers

by Kev H on Oct 26, 2010 12:27 PM CDT up reply actions  

Would

ruin his completion % though…..

That's it! See, at first I thought it was hate, too. Hate was all I knew, it built my world, it imprisoned me, taught me how to eat, how to drink, how to breathe. I thought I'd die with all my hate in my veins. But I realized it was loathing.

-Mike Martz describes his feelings on running the football

by CloudyFuture on Oct 26, 2010 12:44 PM CDT up reply actions  

So do interceptions

"How do you know somebody is great? When you see how they respond to adversity. Anybody can man a ship when the waters are calm." - Jerry Angelo

by propheteer on Oct 26, 2010 12:54 PM CDT up reply actions  

Touche propheteer

touche…..

That's it! See, at first I thought it was hate, too. Hate was all I knew, it built my world, it imprisoned me, taught me how to eat, how to drink, how to breathe. I thought I'd die with all my hate in my veins. But I realized it was loathing.

-Mike Martz describes his feelings on running the football

by CloudyFuture on Oct 26, 2010 12:58 PM CDT up reply actions  

his % has been down this year anyway

One time while a young lad, someone made fun of the Ditka name. One time.

by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Oct 26, 2010 1:05 PM CDT up reply actions  

AKA Mike Williams for every first down??

nahh we are too good at 3rd down conversions already..

"We were freaking robbed!! Our defense totally dominated all day! What? we gave up nearly 500 yards on defense? Yeah but we stopped them on the 1 yrd line! Our D is awesome!!"

- Entire kool aid drinkin' Pride of Detroit site-

by tfrabotta on Oct 26, 2010 12:55 PM CDT up reply actions  

If only we played against our own defense

no wonder we hear how awesome practice went.

Nobody who ever gave his best regretted it. -George Halas

by Allie on Oct 26, 2010 1:00 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

LOL

+1

If you don't ask, you don't get. So get on with it already.

by Suffering from Chicago Sports on Oct 26, 2010 1:28 PM CDT up reply actions  

No.

I had this exact same conversation yesterday. Cutler is a very talented QB and does some things very well and other things not so well. Cutler is a fantastic roll-out QB. Cutler can get a ball to a place very few other QBs in the NFL can get it. Cutler has a good play action skill. Cutler is great at throwing on the move. In Denver, Cutler was in a system that fit him to a T, and if he had a decent defense, they likely would still be in the same system and playing for pro bowl tickets and playoff spots right now. Cutler to Marshall and Royal was a thing of beauty and they had a great line. He did throw picks in the teens, but he threw TDs in the 20s and over 4k yards, so he could work that system. He is very much a “90’s QB” built for a traditional offense.

Cutler is not a cerebral, conservative QB. Martz is actually BEST paired with a cerebral conservative QB believe it or not at your leisure.

If your progression reads have you going top to bottom instead of bottom to top, and making timing based reads and throws, you have to not only take the deep ball when its there, but also GIVE UP ON IT QUICKLY when it is not. Cutler never gives up on a route or a play, and thus never finishes going through his progressions, even when he has time. If he has trouble going through progressions the answer is LESS options, not MORE options.

Martz’ system is ideal for a QB that can make rapid decisions, is 100% willing to just take what is given, and is a “team player” as far as pass distribution. He has to be wiling to go to whoever, whenever. Good QBs that fit that category would be like Brady and Brees. Those guys are not great at running out of power O sets, nor are they dangerous on the bootleg/roll out, but both can take a spread and make amazing quick reads. The more options, the better for them.

For Cutler, give him 2-3 options, one being a dump off, and a max protect set up. It is where he works best, on the move with only a couple of options.

I think we may have picked the worst system for him, and it has NOTHING to do with propensity for turnovers, rather that our QB is not a fast read progression QB and we decided to triple his read obligations.

by Brendan Hess on Oct 26, 2010 12:55 PM CDT reply actions  

I agree

My understanding of the Martzfense is that there are no audibles. The adjustments are sight adjustments at the line. Both the QB and WRs have to spot the read and make the adjustment. I think this is where the breakdown lies. The quick reads are not being made correctly.

Cutler works best when he can get himself into space and wait for the defensive coverage to break down so he can hit the open man. This plays into his strength of, excuse the expression, fitting balls into some pretty tight places.

by Bearly Intimidated on Oct 26, 2010 1:53 PM CDT up reply actions  

At least we're 4-3.

Could be worse. Could be better, but could definitely be worse. It sure won’t be a “win pretty” season, though.

by oripunk3485 on Oct 26, 2010 1:05 PM CDT reply actions  

The Knox Problem

We saw it in Week 1 last season in Green Bay where Knox waited for a slant pass to come to him and the game end when the Bears had a glimmer of a chance after the Jennings long TD.

Last week against Washington, Knox again proved he can’t be counted on in between the hashes on another Cutler INT.

When are the Bears going to realize their personnel and not allow these mistakes to even become a possibility? Knox CANNOT run a slant pattern with confidence.

by Bear_Down on Oct 26, 2010 1:20 PM CDT reply actions  

I disagree and so does Dan Pompei of the Tribune...

I showed this on another post regarding the WR’s after Pompei went over the game tape…..

They looked better on tape than they did at the stadium. Neither Devin Hester nor Johnny Knox was in position to break up any of Cutler’s interceptions, as has been inferred. Knox ran his routes well. Aside from a fourth-quarter drop, Knox did what he was supposed to and had a nice game.

by BearFan611 on Oct 26, 2010 2:02 PM CDT up reply actions  

I disagree with Pompei.

Just sayin. I don’t think that his route running was all that spectacular, he did look a bit slow, and that said hall isn’t THAT fast, he was just getting better leverage than either of our WR’s…

Five foot three seems to thrive on his misery...

by awfullyquiet on Oct 26, 2010 2:19 PM CDT up reply actions  

+1000

He has completely wrong on the the throw to Hester. He just stood there waiting for it to come to him.

"We were freaking robbed!! Our defense totally dominated all day! What? we gave up nearly 500 yards on defense? Yeah but we stopped them on the 1 yrd line! Our D is awesome!!"

- Entire kool aid drinkin' Pride of Detroit site-

by tfrabotta on Oct 26, 2010 3:43 PM CDT up reply actions  

Respectfully disagree on the Hester throw...

I watched it several times after the play was over because of the tirade Aikman threw and there was no way he could have come back on that.

by BearFan611 on Oct 26, 2010 4:04 PM CDT up reply actions  

watch it again

the route should have ended with him coming back towards the ball.

by 62bearsthe best on Oct 26, 2010 6:32 PM CDT up reply actions  

What he said

"We were freaking robbed!! Our defense totally dominated all day! What? we gave up nearly 500 yards on defense? Yeah but we stopped them on the 1 yrd line! Our D is awesome!!"

- Entire kool aid drinkin' Pride of Detroit site-

by tfrabotta on Oct 26, 2010 8:30 PM CDT up reply actions  

Hester was a DB in college

he should know that even as a WR to ATTACK the ball. Like I said in another comment WRs were taught that even in pee wee.

(Sing song)...Everybody Hates Rondo...

by T.Moore on Oct 27, 2010 8:14 AM CDT up reply actions  

Can we agree

that Knox shouldn’t be running slants? I think he looks hesitant when he runs across the middle where all the big bodies are. Why not use him as a decoy if you’re going to run those routes or rub him off a “pick/screen” and drag him across or be the “pick/screen”-setter? I just don’t see any benefit of a guy his size running slants into LB’ers.

by Bear_Down on Oct 26, 2010 5:27 PM CDT up reply actions  

I've made the argument before and I will make it again.

Knox would be better of in the slot, and Bennett would provide more outside. This isn’t to say Knox’s targets should go down. Just that he would be better used in the slot, ala Wes Welker. Bennett is more of an outside possession guy, ala Muhsin Muhammad but without the drops. I like the dispersion of targets. I just think the position change would benefit both Knox and Bennett, as well as the Bears.

in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.

by Timothy Hockemeyer on Oct 27, 2010 8:02 PM CDT up reply actions  

Genuine question:

how much of this inability is simply too much/too soon? You say in DEN with Shanahan they did half-field reads (not exaclty unheard of for young qbs).

I just wonder if 3 systems in 3 years killed his development.

Nobody who ever gave his best regretted it. -George Halas

by Allie on Oct 26, 2010 1:22 PM CDT reply actions  

goind point...

I dunno about killed…but definitely slowed his development. The more seasons under the same system, the more comfortable and better a QB looks/feels…

by Rampage997 on Oct 26, 2010 1:26 PM CDT up reply actions  

The system issue is a possibility

But some of the bad throws I see him make look to me like a misread of the coverage

One time while a young lad, someone made fun of the Ditka name. One time.

by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Oct 26, 2010 1:32 PM CDT up reply actions  

I don’t think they’re all misreads as much as they are him hoping that one of his receivers will go up and fight for the ball every once in awhile. I’m not saying that this thinking is correct, especially considering I feel like he should realize by now that his receivers can’t, and therefore won’t, do that.

by Bearly Intimidated on Oct 26, 2010 1:55 PM CDT up reply actions  

I don't subscribe to this

It’s not like he’s a rookie QB. The guy was paid a ton of money to be an elite QB; imo- nothing is too much, too soon.

"How do you know somebody is great? When you see how they respond to adversity. Anybody can man a ship when the waters are calm." - Jerry Angelo

by propheteer on Oct 26, 2010 1:45 PM CDT up reply actions  

so geting paid means he's no longer human?

I get it. You’re salty.

But damn, man.

Nobody who ever gave his best regretted it. -George Halas

by Allie on Oct 26, 2010 2:11 PM CDT up reply actions  

He made these kinds of mistakes in three different systems.

It’s difficult for me to give him a break when he’s had plenty of time to limit his stupid decision-making and basic fundamentals. If I was his QB coach I’d say something like this…hey Jay, please protect the ball, cause it’s the fourth quarter and we only need a FG to tie the game. Please, pretty please, don’t put our team in an unenviable position. Game awareness is beyond his comprehension; I’m not sure why, but he has hard time figuring out the score and how much time is left in the game.

"How do you know somebody is great? When you see how they respond to adversity. Anybody can man a ship when the waters are calm." - Jerry Angelo

by propheteer on Oct 26, 2010 3:32 PM CDT up reply actions  

So.....

Peyton Manning, who through 95 INTs in his first 5 years (80 games)should have been dumped? How bout Dan Fouts, who threw more INTs than TDs in his first 5 years (57 over 49 games)? Or Favre, who threw 66 INTs in his first 65 games. Maybe Marina, who threw 80 INTs over the 71 games of his first 5 years. Or Elway? 77 INTs over 70 games in his first 5 years. Or Jim Kelly, who threw 71 in his first 5 years.

In fact, if Jay threw 25 more INTs over his next 21 games, he would only equal Mannings numbers.

Come on, man. Put these things into context.

in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.

by Timothy Hockemeyer on Oct 26, 2010 7:55 PM CDT up reply actions  

You and I usually see eye to eye, bro, but damn...

this might be the least insightful comment I have ever seen you make. You ever notice how all the great, hall-of-fame QBs stayed int he same system for most, if not all of their careers? See, Tom Brady, Peyton Manning, John Elway, Dam Marino, Dan Fouts, Jim Kelly and Brett Favre for examples. You ever notice how many QBs who were supposed to be great coming in failed miserably after being dumped into different systems multiple times over the beginning of their career? See Alex Smith, David Carr, Chuck Long, Patrick Ramsey.

Can you name a great QB who endured multiple scheme changes early in their career?

in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.

by Timothy Hockemeyer on Oct 26, 2010 7:14 PM CDT up reply actions  

Finally some help .....

…. with stats arrives !

" Everyone has a plan 'till they get punched in the mouth. " ~
Mike Tyson

by MidWayMonster54 on Oct 26, 2010 8:10 PM CDT up reply actions  

THANK YOU !!!!! The voice of ....

… sanity and the King of Stats . Rec’d .

" Everyone has a plan 'till they get punched in the mouth. " ~
Mike Tyson

by MidWayMonster54 on Oct 26, 2010 8:52 PM CDT up reply actions  

Agreed

I’m thinking that flipping the panic switch on the QB is reactionary more than it is well-thought-out. Green for you!

(Sing song)...Everybody Hates Rondo...

by T.Moore on Oct 27, 2010 8:17 AM CDT up reply actions  

Rec'd because...

Dan Fouts is underrated. And you’re so freaking right.

Five foot three seems to thrive on his misery...

by awfullyquiet on Oct 28, 2010 1:21 AM CDT up reply actions  

i don't think it killed his development...

but, i think he needs some stability. firing martz won’t help.

Five foot three seems to thrive on his misery...

by awfullyquiet on Oct 26, 2010 2:20 PM CDT up reply actions  

Hiring Martz didn't help.

Wish they’d just cleaned house and done the whole “install new system rough year” once.

Nobody who ever gave his best regretted it. -George Halas

by Allie on Oct 26, 2010 2:27 PM CDT up reply actions  

also good point...

As much as I’d like a coaching change, if Bears finally get rid of JA, Lovie & friends, next year will yet again be another system to learn and start from scratch again…but I’ll be ok w/ that. More growning pains on the way?? haha

by Rampage997 on Oct 26, 2010 2:44 PM CDT up reply actions  

Well said

We are in need of a complete overhaul. Evaluations, head coaching etc. If some position coaches like Tice remain it should be up to the next coach.

by TheMan1 on Oct 26, 2010 10:06 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

Stop making excuses for this guy already.

When are you Cutler lovers going to start holding him accountable. Throwing 4 picks to the same guy in the same game, not really all his fault. OK. Throwing as many picks as touchdowns for the season, aww get him some help. When Grossman was stinkin’ up the joint you were calling for his head. Cutler sux too, but now it’s 100% on the offensive line. What’s up with that?

by Big Ike on Oct 26, 2010 1:24 PM CDT reply actions  

Ummm, it's 100% the O-Line.

Enter Captain Obvious.

If you don't ask, you don't get. So get on with it already.

by Suffering from Chicago Sports on Oct 26, 2010 1:30 PM CDT up reply actions  

Seriously though....

Having Cutler produce perfect results is like asking a carpenter to build you a house with a stack of twigs, 6 rolls of duct tape and 12 feet of yarn.

There just ain’t enough there to work with.

Doesn’t Angelo operate the hardware store?

If you don't ask, you don't get. So get on with it already.

by Suffering from Chicago Sports on Oct 26, 2010 1:33 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

Reasons Jay is struggling here.

1. Worst O-line in the history of football. (not the NFL) in football history period.
2. Incompetent coaching (at times) and never use his strengths or never even let him audible.
3. This is his 3rd system in 3 years and this system takes at least 2.5 years fro a QB to get to master the Martz-fense.
4. Gunslinger mentality will throw into tight coverage high risk, high reward guy (but we know this.) That’s what he is.
5. Knox, Hester, anare NOT starting WRs and quit on their routes on a consistent basis inexperience and either #4 or #3 WRs on any other team.
6. I almost quit on Olsen he can’t block and has done nothing to help his cause at receiving.
7. Angelo’s refusal to put more talent around him the moment he got here.
8. Lack of Jay’s favorite guy DA especially in the redzone (Knox and Hester in the redzone WHO ARE YOU FOOLIN?!)
9. Lack of any kind of balance in the offense (but again we know this) Which can be valid given whatever situation we are in.
10. And Cutler not being able to trust the line (what line?) which leads to hurried throws leads to a possible INT. IMO it seems that he’s used to getting his ass knocked down possibly every play (like the giants game) you have that in your mind and can effect your game. Who has been hit more than him?

Now look I’m not excusing Jay’s play yesterday (possibly revived D- Hall’s career damn) But each year at Denver he improved bit by bit he improved. The Moment he got here thats when the 3 or 4 INT’s happened. He had turnovers at Denver but never at this rate. There he had a good WR in Marshall and they compliment each other and good O-line and coaches that get in his ear about his mistakes and help him out with those mistakes.

The Steelers and Packers and Eagles all had subpar O-lines now. GB has Finley, Driver, Jennings, Jones, and Lee (he’s decent)
Eagles have Maclin, Celek, and Jackson.
Steelers Ward, Wallace and Miller and Mendenhall. Thos 3 teams lines aren’t all that great but they had talent around them as well thanks to good GMs.

Right now is much too soon to throw him out of town. If guys can withstand Grossman when he had better talent around him (not saying much but Thomas Jones is better than Taylor and Forte) and much better line back then and when he was used to 1 system (no matter how simple it is) for more than 3 years and seems that he sucked all on his own. If Jay is on an offense like GB (as much as I would hate to say it) he would do much better there than over here imo.

Again I’m not defending his bad play against the Skins
He makes mistakes some of which can cost a game but if I hear anyone saying they would rather have Rex back or Orton after that beat down against the raiders I’m gonna puke.

Its a combination of every thing here the QB, O-line, the GM coaching its been almost everything for years. If we had drafted Peyton here he would suck here too if Angelo did the same crap he is doing now.

(Sing song)...Everybody Hates Rondo...

by T.Moore on Oct 26, 2010 1:34 PM CDT reply actions  

What will a new Head Coach do?

Great QBs learn to live behind bad offensive line, and can actually elevate the performance of mediocre WRs. Not a lot of that seems to be happening.

If Lovie is gone after this season and maybe Angelo with him, what does this mean for Cutler?

Many new Head Coaches want to bring in their own guy to be the QB, especially if they can get a reasonable return for them

by Black-sheep on Oct 26, 2010 1:34 PM CDT reply actions  

You are so dead set on

Harbaugh, i can’t help but slow-clap for it.

If I did what I love for a living, what would I do in my free time?

Writer at windycitygridiron.com {-/-} http://www.twitter.com/kdoggers

by Kev H on Oct 26, 2010 1:36 PM CDT up reply actions  

And if we get offered a R1 for Cutler?

After all, people are suggesting that if the juniors declare this could be the year of the QB

Andrew Luck, Stanford (soph)
Jake Locker, Washington
Ryan Mallett, Arkansas (jnr)
Nick Foles, Arizona (jnr)
Christian Ponder, Florida St

are all carrying a one round grade making this as deep a draft as 2004.

If the Bulls are going to pull the trigger, this is the year to do it

by Black-sheep on Oct 26, 2010 1:41 PM CDT up reply actions  

Haha

I didn’t notice Bulls the first time.

If I did what I love for a living, what would I do in my free time?

Writer at windycitygridiron.com {-/-} http://www.twitter.com/kdoggers

by Kev H on Oct 26, 2010 1:52 PM CDT up reply actions  

lol nice one bro

That one made me laugh in my office.

by Chitownproduct on Oct 26, 2010 2:47 PM CDT up reply actions  

So a QB

who by your account, isn’t very good, is still worth a #1, 2 seasons, what could be nearly 100 sacks, and one concussion later?

If I did what I love for a living, what would I do in my free time?

Writer at windycitygridiron.com {-/-} http://www.twitter.com/kdoggers

by Kev H on Oct 26, 2010 1:51 PM CDT up reply actions  

Washington

Not good in Chicago but back with his old coach, with Moss and Cooley as a target, with Barron and Williams as OTs.

Shanahan is in charge there, and he has a reputation for trading picks for players.

by Black-sheep on Oct 26, 2010 2:28 PM CDT up reply actions  

I don't think Jay has got 3rd round value right now

Who in their right mind would want a 27 year-old rookie QB with a huge ego and attitude?

"How do you know somebody is great? When you see how they respond to adversity. Anybody can man a ship when the waters are calm." - Jerry Angelo

by propheteer on Oct 26, 2010 3:34 PM CDT up reply actions  

Rookie?

Since when did Jay become a rookie?

As for who …. the coach who drafted him and successfully blended his skills to the type of offense he runs aka Mike Shanahan

by Black-sheep on Oct 26, 2010 4:46 PM CDT up reply actions  

It was a jab at Jay

He plays like a rookie, so why would a team want an already molded 27 year-old rookie over a 22 year-old?

"How do you know somebody is great? When you see how they respond to adversity. Anybody can man a ship when the waters are calm." - Jerry Angelo

by propheteer on Oct 26, 2010 4:53 PM CDT up reply actions  

because

the coach wanting him actually molded that 27 year old before he regressed over the last two years?

by Black-sheep on Oct 26, 2010 4:56 PM CDT up reply actions  

He's always been error prone

37 interceptions in 37 games. Not exactly a model of efficiency.

"How do you know somebody is great? When you see how they respond to adversity. Anybody can man a ship when the waters are calm." - Jerry Angelo

by propheteer on Oct 26, 2010 5:01 PM CDT up reply actions  

hmmmm......

Brett Favre 295 games 327 INTs
Dan Marino 242 games 252 INTs
John Elway 234 games 226 INTs
Peyton Manning 198 games 183 INTS
Jim Kelly 160 games 175 INTS
Dan Fouts 181 gmaes 254 INTs

I guess none of these guys were very efficient either……

in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.

by Timothy Hockemeyer on Oct 26, 2010 7:05 PM CDT up reply actions  

If he can put up 40k+ in yardage and 300+ TDs

I’ll be happy to eat some crow.

"How do you know somebody is great? When you see how they respond to adversity. Anybody can man a ship when the waters are calm." - Jerry Angelo

by propheteer on Oct 26, 2010 8:36 PM CDT up reply actions  

Point is...

if you were using the same logic for these players as you are using for Cutler after 5 years, they would all have been gone. None of them would have ever reached those numbers, much less the Hall-of-Fame.

Because they were all in similar positions, as far as INTs go after 5 years. Manning had 95 in his first 80 games. He made a ton of mistakes.

Here’s an interesting thought, on that Subject. Jay Cutler has never had a season in which he threw more INTs than TDs. Nobody on the above list can say the same.

in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.

by Timothy Hockemeyer on Oct 26, 2010 8:41 PM CDT up reply actions  

Nice .

" Everyone has a plan 'till they get punched in the mouth. " ~
Mike Tyson

by MidWayMonster54 on Oct 26, 2010 8:53 PM CDT up reply actions  

How far along in their careers before settling down?

I know each had different system changes and etc but is there a pattern? Or are we hoping Cutler can match what some all time greats did? And pray? I actually support Cutler but listing some greats against what Chicago has shown in QB development areas might be a big hmmmmm waiting.

by TheMan1 on Oct 26, 2010 10:12 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

As far as INTs go?

Never, except for Manning. Favre, Fouts, Kelly, Elway and Marino continued to throw a high percentage of INTs throughout their whole careers. Like I said above, INTs come with confident QBs who are going to throw the ball int tight spaces because they believe in themselves.

Peyton Manning is a bit of an anomaly. After his 5th season, he settled down quite a bit on the INTs, though he has had a couple of exceptions (namely 2007 and 2009).

in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.

by Timothy Hockemeyer on Oct 27, 2010 6:58 AM CDT up reply actions  

Whoa

Let’s not compare someone who has a career 28-32 record with a bunch of Hall of Fame QBs. 3 of the 6 you listed are champions (4 total) at least once, with two others being very close on 6 different occasions. Jay has yet to lead a team to the playoffs. I could care less about individual numbers.

You’re putting the cart way ahead of the horse.

"How do you know somebody is great? When you see how they respond to adversity. Anybody can man a ship when the waters are calm." - Jerry Angelo

by propheteer on Oct 26, 2010 10:39 PM CDT up reply actions  

As are you . Your sayin Jay is ...

… a bust at this point in his career , but with the wonderful stats provided by Train it illustrates that many QB’s have issues their first 5 years .

" Everyone has a plan 'till they get punched in the mouth. " ~
Mike Tyson

by MidWayMonster54 on Oct 27, 2010 2:24 AM CDT up reply actions  

Easy response...

Exactly zero of the QBs listed above were champions by this point in their careers. This is Cutler’s 5th season. Favre did it the earliest in his 6th season. Manning took 9 seasons, and Elway took 15 years. If the men who controlled these QBs futures had reacted to the future hall-of-famers the way you have responded to a qb who has seen 3 different systems in 5 years, none of them would have won a championship, broken any records, seen the hall-of-fame or been on this list.

And this whole “Jay hasn’t led a team to the playoffs yet” argument is bogus, disingenuous and just utter crap. His seasons in Denver were marred by horrible defenses completely letting down the offense, with his pro-bowl season being helped along by a defense that was 30th in the league in points allowed. And in his first year in Chicago, he was treated to the 6th worst defensive effort for points allowed in Chicago’s 90 year history. Pretending like the QB is the only factor in wins and losses is just plain dishonest.

in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.

by Timothy Hockemeyer on Oct 27, 2010 6:44 AM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

And not putting anything before anything....

The only person here who has done that is you, my friend. I never said Jay would be any of those players. I took the statistic you offered and explained why you misused the stat. I simply took a benchmark and compared Cutler too that mark, which is how you analyze statistics. You failed to put them in context. I put them in context for you. It’s really that simple.

Your interpretation of the INT stat was way, WAY off. I showed just how far off it was. I said nothing at all about Jay being as good as any of the aforementioned players. In fact, the only person here in this conversation who has claimed to know anything about Jay’s skill level is you, my friend.

in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.

by Timothy Hockemeyer on Oct 27, 2010 6:51 AM CDT up reply actions  

Stats

can be a man’s best friend or a man’s worst enemy.

(Sing song)...Everybody Hates Rondo...

by T.Moore on Oct 27, 2010 8:21 AM CDT up reply actions  

It has nothing to do with skill

and everything to do with his football IQ. As of right now, in this point of his career, he doesn’t do the right things at crucial points of the game. Ok, so the interceptions analysis is a bit skewed like you illustrated, but he’s literally lost the Bears about a half a dozen games so far since he’s been here, and Sunday’s loss will prove to be the nail in the playoff coffin.

"How do you know somebody is great? When you see how they respond to adversity. Anybody can man a ship when the waters are calm." - Jerry Angelo

by propheteer on Oct 27, 2010 9:48 AM CDT up reply actions  

So he was the only player on the field ....

… I take it ??? Like I said ealier you can’t blame one player for the failures of 11 .

" Everyone has a plan 'till they get punched in the mouth. " ~
Mike Tyson

by MidWayMonster54 on Oct 27, 2010 12:45 PM CDT up reply actions  

What don't you understand

about the importance of the QB play in the outcome of games? Again, I obviously admit the O-line has it’s problems, but his throws were of the rookie variety. You know the ones that look like a QB playing in the league for the first time.

For goodness sakes Sam Bradford (with a bunch of rag-tag WRs) is about as good as Cutler right now. Shawn Hill, a forever journeyman, is playing better than him with a bad offensive line. Fitzgerald, Garrard, Kolb, Wallace, Cassell, Young, Sanchez, Henne are ahead of Jay in rating. The list is endless….

"Wish the opposite sex operated like NFL redzone does. Just let me know when I’m about to score, otherwise, don’t bother me." - Jenn Sterger

by propheteer on Oct 27, 2010 12:58 PM CDT up reply actions  

To be fair....

There are many people who understate the role of a QB in the W/L record……..and just as many who overstate it.

There are also far to many people who fail to understand where responsibility falls on plays and way to many people who assume all of the responsibility for a play falls on this receiver, or the QB, or the line.

There are an awful lot of assumptions being made on this board. You just listed a whole bunch of QBs ahead of Jay in rating…..Which have a worse line? Which one has a less experienced and proven group of receivers? Most importantly…….which one is throwing in a timing route system?

in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.

by Timothy Hockemeyer on Oct 27, 2010 5:34 PM CDT up reply actions  

kinda akin to watching case keenum

and saying he’s a great qb. it’s part of the system. and with the aforementioned NFL QB’s it probably has something to do with it in high percentage passing schemes that they’re in as well.

recognizing the system, the cog, and all of the moving parts is very. very. very. hard, separating one, and looking at it individually as an evaluation is just as hard.

Five foot three seems to thrive on his misery...

by awfullyquiet on Oct 28, 2010 8:23 PM CDT up reply actions  

Ok Propheteer .....

…… The Ravens went to a won a Super Bowl with Trent Dilfer not doing an effin thing at the position . Rex Grossman went to a Super Bowl with 20 TD’s & 20 INT’s . So really how important is the QB position ??? Not all that important if you don’t have a team around you as the two QB’s above prove . Both had solid teams around them and both were semi – successful and got to the big game .

" Everyone has a plan 'till they get punched in the mouth. " ~
Mike Tyson

by MidWayMonster54 on Oct 27, 2010 8:50 PM CDT up reply actions  

Those were exceptions to the rule

Hester (STS were the best in the league) and the Bears defense (#1 in turnovers) were the primary reasons why they got there. For the Ravens, they had arguably one of the best defenses of all time and a great running game.

"Wish the opposite sex operated like NFL redzone does. Just let me know when I’m about to score, otherwise, don’t bother me." - Jenn Sterger

by propheteer on Oct 27, 2010 9:41 PM CDT up reply actions  

But if the QB is so important ....

….. this should never happen .

" Everyone has a plan 'till they get punched in the mouth. " ~
Mike Tyson

by MidWayMonster54 on Oct 27, 2010 10:33 PM CDT up reply actions  

What measure are you using to gage his football IQ?

And while the condescending “what don’t you understand” argument used against MM below might seem adequate to you, it does not to me. If a QB doesn’t have receivers open to throw to, a line to protect him, and rushers capable of taking pressure off of him, blaming him for forcing the issue is a bit like blaming a soldier for continuing to fight a losing battle after the rest of his comrades have fallen.

Please explain how we would have won these games you claim he lost. And use specifics, because vague references are not reasonable arguments.

in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.

by Timothy Hockemeyer on Oct 27, 2010 5:44 PM CDT up reply actions  

I've already listed them

Don’t throw into blanket coverage- don’t throw the quick slant to Knox when Hall had inside leverage, don’t throw inside to Hester before his break and again when Hall had inside leverage, don’t over throw Knox by twenty yards when all the team needed was 3 points to tie or win with TD.

This goes back to Les’ post about him not being able to read a defense. Do you know why Shanny had him run so many bootlegs in Denver? Because he only had to read half the field. At this point in his career he lacks the ability to consistently go through his progressions and make the correct reads.

"Wish the opposite sex operated like NFL redzone does. Just let me know when I’m about to score, otherwise, don’t bother me." - Jenn Sterger

by propheteer on Oct 27, 2010 10:42 PM CDT up reply actions  

So its Martz's fault ....

….. for not playing to his strengths . Gotta lay blame on one dude and it sounds like hes it …. according to your assessment anyway .

" Everyone has a plan 'till they get punched in the mouth. " ~
Mike Tyson

by MidWayMonster54 on Oct 28, 2010 12:38 AM CDT up reply actions  

Partly

but Martz isn’t throwing the ball or making the wrong reads.

"Wish the opposite sex operated like NFL redzone does. Just let me know when I’m about to score, otherwise, don’t bother me." - Jenn Sterger

by propheteer on Oct 28, 2010 8:44 AM CDT up reply actions  

ummm........
Do you know why Shanny had him run so many bootlegs in Denver? Because he only had to read half the field. At this point in his career he lacks the ability to consistently go through his progressions and make the correct reads.

You know, I’d like to know how you know why Shanahan made his decisions. I know Les brought this up above, but as a question, not as fact. You have jumped into full blown BS right here. Where did Shanahan espouse these things, I ask.

And you are now claiming to know, without question, what Jay Cutler is capable of? Really. Then I’m not sure why we are still discussing this. Come on, you’re not even claiming these as opinions any more. You are stating things you cannot possibly know for certain as known fact.

Hey, I can do that too. You know why Peyton Manning has so many touchdowns? Because he’s a robot and the balls he throws have homing receivers that are paired with transmitters embedded in Reggie Wayne’s gloves. Without them he would just throw the ball into the stands and start calculating phi.

in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.

by Timothy Hockemeyer on Oct 28, 2010 7:33 AM CDT up reply actions  

I'd love a robot to lead the Bears

One time while a young lad, someone made fun of the Ditka name. One time.

by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Oct 28, 2010 8:35 AM CDT up reply actions  

Me too, Les. Me too.

Wait……does that count Lovie? If it does, I might change my vote.

in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.

by Timothy Hockemeyer on Oct 28, 2010 8:41 AM CDT up reply actions  

Ok

Let me head over to MHR to see if they have actual articles, cause I remember reading about it when he was in Denver.

Have you seen anything consistently from Jay to point to him being able to read the entire defense and field? I sure haven’t.

"Wish the opposite sex operated like NFL redzone does. Just let me know when I’m about to score, otherwise, don’t bother me." - Jenn Sterger

by propheteer on Oct 28, 2010 8:46 AM CDT up reply actions  

over 60% of his passes.

You know, the ones he completed?

in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.

by Timothy Hockemeyer on Oct 28, 2010 8:47 AM CDT up reply actions  

And I asked where Shanahan said these things...

Not where some blogger said he thought it.

in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.

by Timothy Hockemeyer on Oct 28, 2010 8:49 AM CDT up reply actions  

The fact is

when you roll out you only read part of the field. Unless you have a specific misdirection throwback play called.

I doubt Shanahan ever came out and said that he did so because Cutler couldn’t process the entire field.

It’s just something that makes sense given some of the wild throws he seems to make the last year and a half.

One time while a young lad, someone made fun of the Ditka name. One time.

by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Oct 28, 2010 9:45 AM CDT up reply actions  

That's certainly fact

You don’t need a quote to understand that he has trouble going to his second and third options (reading the entire field and defense).

"Wish the opposite sex operated like NFL redzone does. Just let me know when I’m about to score, otherwise, don’t bother me." - Jenn Sterger

by propheteer on Oct 28, 2010 10:15 AM CDT up reply actions  

It's something I've wondered

But for as many horrendous reads I thought he may have made, he’s made others that were perfect…

Time will tell…

One time while a young lad, someone made fun of the Ditka name. One time.

by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Oct 28, 2010 10:51 AM CDT up reply actions  

Hoping that bailed you out, did you?

Les didn’t state fact, he cited his opinion on a possibility.

You stated this as fact, which requires cited proof. I think that’s what you are missing here. Hell, even Lester, who wrote the post, notes this as possibility with the above response.

Fact and opinion are two very different things.

in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.

by Timothy Hockemeyer on Oct 28, 2010 4:10 PM CDT up reply actions  

A reasonable argument....

But, reads are not the sole reason coaches call rollouts, not are they generally the primary reason. Mobile QBs sent into rollout cause problems for defenses.

I appreciate the possibility. But there’s a big difference between accepting possibility and stating it as fact.

in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.

by Timothy Hockemeyer on Oct 28, 2010 4:06 PM CDT up reply actions  

Nope it's a fact

When a QB rolls out he’s instructed to only read the part of the field in front of him. Makes no sense for a kid to run sprint right then have him worry about stuff back to his left… unless of course you have a waggle type throwback play called.

Most coaches don’t even bother having any receivers on the backside of the roll out.

I’m not saying his inability to read an entire field is why Shanahan rolled Cutler out in Denver, it’s just a possibility.

One time while a young lad, someone made fun of the Ditka name. One time.

by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Oct 29, 2010 9:19 AM CDT up reply actions  

You clearly misunderstand something I said here, Les.

Because it is not fact that reads are the sole reason to call rollouts. It’s also not fact that they are the primary reason to call rollouts. Protection, extending time for the play to develop and overloading defenses on one side of the field are the primary reasons, though they would also help a QB struggling with reading the whole field.

I never said that a QB reads the whole field on a rollout. I think this is where the confusion started. I said reads are not the sole reason, or even the primary reason to call the play.

in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.

by Timothy Hockemeyer on Oct 29, 2010 5:55 PM CDT up reply actions  

To add

On Hall’s TD return he had great protection, but instead of stepping into his throw and throwing on time, he threw a duck off his back foot very late….the rest is HOF history.

I actually forgot this is the post about him not being able to read defenses.

"Wish the opposite sex operated like NFL redzone does. Just let me know when I’m about to score, otherwise, don’t bother me." - Jenn Sterger

by propheteer on Oct 27, 2010 10:46 PM CDT up reply actions  

So explain how what he's done is....

different from the very same types of mistakes that the aforementioned HOFers were making. Were they poor at reading coverages, as well? Was Mannings football IQ low when he threw 95 ill advised passes in his first 5 years?

Manning wasn’t capable of reading defenses?

Because Manning made all of these types of mistakes, and still does. 1 per game last season, on average, if fact.

This is where I just shake my head, because some people are so focused on a biased perception that they ignore the facts.

All of the aforementioned QBs had the same problems. Explain why even though they all fit the criteria you listed above, as they have all committed the same types of mistakes, they all have good football IQs and Cutler doesn’t. Is Drew Brees FIQ deficient because he threw 4 INTS against the Browns, of all teams? If he isn’t, then why not.

I await these answers, an hope they provide more interesting reads than “because they proved something”, to which I will be forced to reply that they wouldn’t have proven squat if someone with your opinion of what makes a quarterback FIQ stupid was in charge of their futures at the 5 year point.

in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.

by Timothy Hockemeyer on Oct 28, 2010 7:25 AM CDT up reply actions  

You keeping on stating this five-year snapshot

There’s no guarantee Cutler will be able to duplicate what these guys have done. Actually, it’s quite improbable. Just because he was a former first round draft pick, it doesn’t mean he’ll pan out to be a HOF QB.

"Wish the opposite sex operated like NFL redzone does. Just let me know when I’m about to score, otherwise, don’t bother me." - Jenn Sterger

by propheteer on Oct 28, 2010 8:49 AM CDT up reply actions  

I haven't ever said he would.

I said that if you were in charge of any of these QBs, they never would have reached the Hall-of-Fame because you would have thought they sucked, couldn’t read a field and could make good decisions.

I’ve never claimed to know were Cutler was headed. But I know it has to do with a more than Jay, just as the Teams success and failure does now.

in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.

by Timothy Hockemeyer on Oct 28, 2010 8:52 AM CDT up reply actions  

* could NOT make good decisions.

It’s about time for bed, lol.

in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.

by Timothy Hockemeyer on Oct 28, 2010 8:53 AM CDT up reply actions  

Look.

I’m in no way saying that Cutler will be great. I am saying that those who claim to know what he is or will be, under this or any system are over-reaching and over-reacting.

Cutler has 5½ games in a new and difficult system. It took Manning Years under the same system to achieve consistency, and you and others expected Cutler to just pick up and run with one of the most complicated systems in the game? With a horrid O-Line, uncertain receivers and a non-existent running game, you really believe 5½ games is enough to gage his future on?

Honestly?

in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.

by Timothy Hockemeyer on Oct 28, 2010 8:56 AM CDT up reply actions  

wow....clarification...

It took Manning 5 years of consistency under the same system (not the same system Chicago runs)………

I really need to go to bed. Damn.

in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.

by Timothy Hockemeyer on Oct 28, 2010 8:58 AM CDT up reply actions  

Ok

but did you know about this little snippet about Martz’s complex offense?

Despite Martz’s reputation for carrying a diverse offensive playbook, of Chicago’s 425 snaps, 389 have come from two formations (three receivers and two tight ends), according to ESPN Stats and Information, opening up the possibility the Bears may be too predictable.

Here’s another indictment on Jay…

On the topic of turnovers, Martz absolved receivers Johnny Knox and Devin Hester of all blame on two of Cutler’s interceptions, but at the same time, continued to heap praise on his quarterback

.

So much for the theory that Hester and Knox didn’t do what they were supposed to do. No, it was more Jay being reckless as ever with the football.

"Wish the opposite sex operated like NFL redzone does. Just let me know when I’m about to score, otherwise, don’t bother me." - Jenn Sterger

by propheteer on Oct 28, 2010 10:22 AM CDT up reply actions  

So your response is....

to quote a critical opinion piece? Thanks for proving that you have absolutely no objectivity.

in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.

by Timothy Hockemeyer on Oct 28, 2010 4:03 PM CDT up reply actions  

And formations have nothing to do with the.....

complexity of the playbook. I’m starting to wonder here. You really believe that because a majority of plays are run out of two packages that it loses complexity of routes, timing and strategy? And it’s not even this simple.

Of course they are running 2 TEs sets and 3 wides most. The extra blockers are needed. But Dickerson seems to have a problem understanding the difference between Sets and formations. Split back, Power I, Trips, etc are formations. 2 TE, 3 WR are sets. You can runs multiple formations out of a single set.

I’m stunned that Dickerson (and you) didn’t know that. Well, maybe not Dickerson….he works for ESPN. But I am stunned you didn’t know. I actually respect you :)

in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.

by Timothy Hockemeyer on Oct 28, 2010 4:17 PM CDT up reply actions  

That Dickerson piece was bad

with two TE and 3 WR, you can give a defense a myriad of looks.

The offense I run with my team (8th grade) is always a 2 RB, 2 WR, 1 TE set, but out of that we have 20 different formations.

One time while a young lad, someone made fun of the Ditka name. One time.

by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Oct 29, 2010 9:22 AM CDT up reply actions  

The top three on your list

all choked in big games and didn’t step up this year. Locker has been the worst of the three. So you want to give up on Cutler who has shown the ability to be great and lead a team from behind for guys who are struggling to do it at the collegiate level??

"We were freaking robbed!! Our defense totally dominated all day! What? we gave up nearly 500 yards on defense? Yeah but we stopped them on the 1 yrd line! Our D is awesome!!"

- Entire kool aid drinkin' Pride of Detroit site-

by tfrabotta on Oct 26, 2010 3:48 PM CDT up reply actions  

Here's some Luck Quality

MercuryNews.com

A 35-point favorite, Stanford stumbled on offense out of the gate. Stanford failed to score a touchdown after an Owen Marecic interception on the Cougars’ first series had taken the ball to the WSU 7-yard line. On first down, Cardinal quarterback Andrew Luck bobbled the snap, picked up the ball, then wobbled a pass into the ground. Ryan Whalen, who was wide open in the end zone, had no chance to catch it. Stanford had to settle for a field goal.

If I did what I love for a living, what would I do in my free time?

Writer at windycitygridiron.com {-/-} http://www.twitter.com/kdoggers

by Kev H on Oct 26, 2010 4:47 PM CDT up reply actions  

So an experienced quarterback 4 years in the NFL is allowed a free pass showing little improvement on the skills he showed in college ie reading defenses, gunslinger mentality, whilst a red shirted sophmore is not allowed a bad game?

Luck will be the best QB drafted since Peyton Manning,

Cutler will be the 21st century’s Jeff George.

by Black-sheep on Oct 26, 2010 4:51 PM CDT up reply actions  

You want that redshirt sophomore

to be the franchise quarterback for the Bears NEXT YEAR. No, he doesn’t get a bad game.

Luck will be the best QB drafted since Peyton Manning

Are you his dad?

If I did what I love for a living, what would I do in my free time?

Writer at windycitygridiron.com {-/-} http://www.twitter.com/kdoggers

by Kev H on Oct 26, 2010 4:55 PM CDT up reply actions  

Are you Jay’s brother?

by Black-sheep on Oct 26, 2010 5:01 PM CDT up reply actions  

Is this Jerry angelos nephew???

"We were freaking robbed!! Our defense totally dominated all day! What? we gave up nearly 500 yards on defense? Yeah but we stopped them on the 1 yrd line! Our D is awesome!!"

- Entire kool aid drinkin' Pride of Detroit site-

by tfrabotta on Oct 26, 2010 8:33 PM CDT up reply actions  

This ↑

in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.

by Timothy Hockemeyer on Oct 26, 2010 8:37 PM CDT up reply actions  

Winner

and since that poor outing, Stanford have won their next two games.

Currently Luck is leading them to their best record in the first 7 games since 1970.

Err, John Elway didn’t even manage that !!!!

by Black-sheep on Oct 26, 2010 4:54 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yes.

Here’s their seven games:

Sacramento State: 3-4
UCLA: 3-4
Wake Forest: 2-5
Notre Dame: 4-4
Oregon: 7-0 (also getting shellacked by 21, btw)
UCLA: 5-2 (credit to stanford for the last second field goal to win)
Washington State: 1-7

Please don’t get ahead of yourself this early in the game.

If I did what I love for a living, what would I do in my free time?

Writer at windycitygridiron.com {-/-} http://www.twitter.com/kdoggers

by Kev H on Oct 26, 2010 5:01 PM CDT up reply actions  

Oregon game

"We were freaking robbed!! Our defense totally dominated all day! What? we gave up nearly 500 yards on defense? Yeah but we stopped them on the 1 yrd line! Our D is awesome!!"

- Entire kool aid drinkin' Pride of Detroit site-

by tfrabotta on Oct 26, 2010 8:32 PM CDT up reply actions  

Cutler at Vanderbilt

Struggled at collegiate level enjoying a losing record if I remember correctly.

by Black-sheep on Oct 26, 2010 4:48 PM CDT up reply actions  

You don't seem to get it

I’m not saying he’s not going to be good.

I’m saying there is no way I want him as the quarterback of my beloved Chicago Bears next year. In the future? Sure. In 2011, No.

If I did what I love for a living, what would I do in my free time?

Writer at windycitygridiron.com {-/-} http://www.twitter.com/kdoggers

by Kev H on Oct 26, 2010 5:02 PM CDT up reply actions  

and neither it appears do you

I would accept the pain of a rookie QB season, rather than Cutler demonstrating under a 4th system with a new Head Coach, that he simply doesn’t have the leadership qualities to take my team deep into playoffs, leaving us having to find a new QB in a QB shallow class in future classes.

You ideally draft when there is quality at a position not when the position is weak but you are compelled to over draft

Clearly if he pulls it out of the bag in the remaining 9 games then fair enough but as things are going it will be typical if the Bears miss that chance.

We might as well retain Angelo, Lovie Smith and Mike Martz and give them all contract extensions.

by Black-sheep on Oct 26, 2010 5:08 PM CDT up reply actions  

So then let me guess

you’d rather they lose out so they have the top ten shot at him?

If I did what I love for a living, what would I do in my free time?

Writer at windycitygridiron.com {-/-} http://www.twitter.com/kdoggers

by Kev H on Oct 26, 2010 6:59 PM CDT up reply actions  

Well, even further

realistically, they have to have a top 5 shot to get it, meaning they will almost definitely need to lose out.

If I did what I love for a living, what would I do in my free time?

Writer at windycitygridiron.com {-/-} http://www.twitter.com/kdoggers

by Kev H on Oct 27, 2010 11:13 AM CDT up reply actions  

With a 7-9 record last year

We would have picked at No11.

While its unlikely Luck would fall so far, putting together two picks to move up to same No3 is possible.

On the draft value chart, No3 is worth 2,200 pts. If we were to pick at No11 then that is worth 1250pts. If Cutler was traded to the Redskins who finished 9-7 and draft at No17, then the trade is equal in points.

Why would a team like the Bills want to trade down?

1. They might prefer Locker or Mallet and feel they can get their guy lower. In 2008, the Ravens traded down from No8 to No26 and then back up to No18 for Flacco

2. Salary. Gerald McCoy signed a $63m/5year deal at No3 and QBs often have a premium. Anthony Davis at No11 signed a $26.5m deal and Mike Iupati signed a $18.25m deal from No17

By trading down, the Bills get two guys they need including a QB and Ralph Wilson spends $44.75m instead of $63m. For a small town team that’s over $18m saved and an extra player.

If teams like the Panthers, Lions, Broncos, pick in the Top2 then it could well be that the top 2 selections might be the likes of Marcell Dareus, Patrick Patterson, A J Green, Adrian Clayborn

3. We still have a 2nd round with which we could add someone like Gabe Carimi and a 3rd round for Austin Pettis or the fast rising Dwayne Harris.

Its extremely unlikely but it might occur. More importantly the Maths says its possible.

by Black-sheep on Oct 27, 2010 2:43 PM CDT up reply actions  

Who would want an R1 for Jay?

And he wont be traded unless a WHOLE new system/staff are brought in, but even then.

by chicago030 on Oct 26, 2010 3:53 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

The only one I'm sold on

Is Luck, but he’ll probably get picked No. 1 overall or close to it. The Bears have 4 wins already, so their chances of drafting that high are pretty slim. I haven’t given up on Cutler, although I have given up on Martz.

by Dick Butka on Oct 26, 2010 9:01 PM CDT up reply actions  

clap...

… … … … clap
… … … clap
… … clap
… clap
clap clap clap clap

One time while a young lad, someone made fun of the Ditka name. One time.

by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Oct 26, 2010 1:49 PM CDT up reply actions  

You know you can get a shot for that right?

David Taylor's personal hype man. Check out his website unless you're a loser. http://www.cheekymonkeyart.com/

by Ditkavsworld on Oct 26, 2010 3:22 PM CDT up reply actions  

Quarterback-up

This may sound crazy to some but how about a really good backup for Cutler? He could get injured or just have one of his bipolar days ..and then what?
 OK two words: Colt Brennan
                             Free Agent
                             Heisman Candidate
                              Super Bowl

by jimmyaloha on Oct 26, 2010 1:59 PM CDT reply actions  

That's 8 words by my count.

But close.

If I did what I love for a living, what would I do in my free time?

Writer at windycitygridiron.com {-/-} http://www.twitter.com/kdoggers

by Kev H on Oct 26, 2010 2:12 PM CDT up reply actions  

lol colt brennan.

_

Five foot three seems to thrive on his misery...

by awfullyquiet on Oct 26, 2010 2:22 PM CDT up reply actions  

say what?

David Taylor's personal hype man. Check out his website unless you're a loser. http://www.cheekymonkeyart.com/

by Ditkavsworld on Oct 26, 2010 3:23 PM CDT up reply actions  

Your right

it does sound crazy…

"We were freaking robbed!! Our defense totally dominated all day! What? we gave up nearly 500 yards on defense? Yeah but we stopped them on the 1 yrd line! Our D is awesome!!"

- Entire kool aid drinkin' Pride of Detroit site-

by tfrabotta on Oct 26, 2010 3:48 PM CDT up reply actions  

I sounds like you are assuming Jay did not see the defender that intercepted his passes

Personally I do not assume that. He may well have seen the defender but realized his receiver should be able to step-up and catch the ball. Instead, his receivers stood and took pictures of the interceptions. If the receiver had been someone like TO instead of Bear’s garbage, the first time the defender tried to jump the route the receiver would have got in his way, caught the ball, spun away and raced downfield for a touchdown. There would not have been another route jumped for the rest of the game and we would be talking about what a great day Jay had.

by stanfordron on Oct 26, 2010 2:15 PM CDT reply actions  

'being aggressive'

Five foot three seems to thrive on his misery...

by awfullyquiet on Oct 26, 2010 2:23 PM CDT up reply actions  

I want to see more of DA

He’s the biggest guy we’ve got, give him some opportunities and see what happens.

by DaHamsta on Oct 26, 2010 2:35 PM CDT reply actions  

and Dez Clark too.

It has not worked with Hester-Bennett-Knox-Olsen-Manu getting 99% of the snaps on offense.

How about we get Dez on the field for Manu and DA on the field for Knox & Hester a little?

by Mike Mueller on Oct 26, 2010 2:40 PM CDT up reply actions  

Biggest wtf stories of the season so far?

DA and Clark deserve to be on that field. Maybe Jay is intentionally throwing interceptions in order to get to get what he wants.

"How do you know somebody is great? When you see how they respond to adversity. Anybody can man a ship when the waters are calm." - Jerry Angelo

by propheteer on Oct 26, 2010 3:37 PM CDT up reply actions  

Why is bigger better?

So we get a different angle of the snapshot by the receiver of the DB jumping his route? We need receivers that are at a skill level beyond that of a so-so college sophomore.

by stanfordron on Oct 26, 2010 3:38 PM CDT up reply actions  

bigger can be better

If the WR can utilize his size to not give up the leverage on the quick slants and digs. This can help on short yardage plays and in the red zone.

by KyCubsFan on Oct 26, 2010 3:40 PM CDT up reply actions  

He is the ONLY one that

ATTACKS THE BALL on this team.

(Sing song)...Everybody Hates Rondo...

by T.Moore on Oct 27, 2010 8:24 AM CDT up reply actions  

Can't we just go back to saying that he is color blind?

Lifelong Arizona Cardinals/Chicago Bears fan [I have always lived in Arizona, dad is from Chicago].

I can't stand fair-weather/bandwagon fans, stick with your team(s), throughout the good and the bad. And don't switch to whichever team wins the Super Bowl each year.

by JoeCB1991 on Oct 26, 2010 3:34 PM CDT reply actions  

so

We need to bring in Vinny Testeverde to teach Jay about color blindness, Kurt Warner to teach him about Martzfense, Jim McMahon in to teach him how to be cool.

Then we will have a good QB..

by KyCubsFan on Oct 26, 2010 3:37 PM CDT up reply actions  

Night blind not color blind.

David Taylor's personal hype man. Check out his website unless you're a loser. http://www.cheekymonkeyart.com/

by Ditkavsworld on Oct 26, 2010 3:47 PM CDT up reply actions  

I agree with one main point

Cutler does need to take control of the offense. Its his offense. A good example is Ray Lewis. That’s his defense and everyone knows it. If you watch him on the sideline he is constantly motivating and working with his defense for all 60 mins. Thats what you get paid for. Not to come it for 3 plays and then go take a break on the bench til its your turn again. Talent-wise Cutler’s the best the Bears have had in a real long time. We all know it but now its about time to see it

by bears0719 on Oct 26, 2010 4:22 PM CDT reply actions  

I find it funny that Bears fans gave Rex tons of time before they wanted him out....

and after a year and a half they want Jay gone. He has performed before and yet here everyone wanted a messiah. This all boils down to the lack of anything around Jay. Call him egotistical or whatever you want but the guy has skill. Most QB’s have egos and the good ones have good talent around them. People in this city are so quick to crucify people when they have bad games. Has Jay been very bad at times? Of course he has. But has Jay also been great? Yes he has. The biggest problem I see is that none of these coaches want to knock him down a peg. He needs a good butt-kicking and I guarantee his decision-making will improve. Mike Shanahan is pretty good at recognizing talent so he saw good things in Jay and was on his way to molding Jay into a good QB. Here in Chicago his growth has been stunted by many factors. Chill out already and let’s at least see what the guy can do with stability around him. I am a Jay supporter but I’m not an idiot. If I see that he is still making dumb mistakes when he finally has what he needs, then I will agree with the meatheads. I’m not apologizing for the guy but everyone needs to relax and look at the entire picture before jumping off a cliff

by frenchbears113 on Oct 26, 2010 4:51 PM CDT reply actions  

Well said.

If I did what I love for a living, what would I do in my free time?

Writer at windycitygridiron.com {-/-} http://www.twitter.com/kdoggers

by Kev H on Oct 26, 2010 5:04 PM CDT up reply actions  

I'm sort of in agreement

but it could just be my Lovie loathing speaking.

I long for a coach who will grab a player by the facemask and say “Hey, knock that stuff off”.

Nobody who ever gave his best regretted it. -George Halas

by Allie on Oct 26, 2010 5:13 PM CDT up reply actions  

I'm not sure what he needs

IMO, he’ll always be a gun-slinger with bad decision making tendencies. Yes, he’s certainly had good games, but the bad ones have severely out-weighed them. With a solid offensive line and a decent running game maybe he can finally see the light. It’s just so frustrating as a fan to possibly see another failure at the QB position.

BTW- I bailed on Grossman after the first half of the SB.

"Wish the opposite sex operated like NFL redzone does. Just let me know when I’m about to score, otherwise, don’t bother me." - Jenn Sterger

by propheteer on Oct 27, 2010 5:43 PM CDT up reply actions  

Again, the very same things you just said would apply equally to....

Brett Favre, Jim Kelly, Dan Fouts, Dan Marino and John Elway throughout their whole careers, and to Peyton manning at this point in his career.

And without a solid line and a decent running game, pretty much every QB is in the same position….the position to fail.

in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.

by Timothy Hockemeyer on Oct 27, 2010 5:47 PM CDT up reply actions  

I was just watching NFL playbook

and they were criticizing Brett Farve on his reading or lack of reading the GB defense.
They we asking why he was trying to force a throw into a covered Berryman when Harveywallbanger was wide open. etc. There is only one Peyton Manning and he throws and INT every so often as well.

If you love to hate QB’s then being a Bears fan is heaven cuz we have had a boat load of bad QB’s (you listening Jim Miller you poser).

by 62bearsthe best on Oct 26, 2010 6:41 PM CDT reply actions  

every so often?

Manning has thrown 183 of them in 195 games. INTs happen to QBs who take chances and actually throw the ball. People are making more out than they should about Jay’s INTs. Manning threw 95 in his first 5 years. Jay is on pace to throw 16 INTs this year. He threw 26 last year. His INT% is 3.9 this season, and it was 4.7 last year.

The real worry should be that he’s also on pace for only 16 TD passes. He had 27 last year. His TD% is 3.9 this year, and it was 4.9 last year.

Come on, people. Jay’s INT percentage is about the same as Aaron Rodgers. He’s had one bad game as far as INTs go this season. We’re getting ahead of ourselves on this. The real problems aren’t in the INTs but in scoring.

in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.

by Timothy Hockemeyer on Oct 26, 2010 7:48 PM CDT up reply actions  

I think you are making much ado about stuffing...

Cutler thew 2 INTs on Sunday. The other 2 were on the WRs. I personally think Cutler played awful last Sunday, but to say he cannot read defenses is moronic. Jay is playing the high-risk/high-reward game. He’s trying to make the big play on every play because he knows damn well that this talent on this offense cannot sustain drives or play consistently. If he doesn’t try to make the big play, the offense has zero chance. If there is no 70-80 yard TD run/pass, the Bears offense is just not good enough to put together a 12 play 80 yard drive. SO the calculation becomes this for Cutler to have success:

Take all sorts of risks and maybe break 2-3 big plays during the game and hope the defense can hold down their own and the ST can generate field position/points.

or

Run an offense similar to the Orton offense that can ONLY win when the defense holds the opposition to under 14 points by kicking 3-5 FGs a game.

I’ve said this many times before, CUTLER IS NOT PERFECT BUT HE’S THE LAST THING THE OFFENSE NEEDS TO FIX! Get 1 starting WR and a few decent O-linemen and if he sucks ass then you can complain about it.

IT'S NOT TOO LATE TO FIRE LOVIE (IT'S BACK BABY!)!!!

"There's a fine line between stupid, and clever!"

by LostInSTL on Oct 26, 2010 7:44 PM CDT reply actions  

THIS^^^^^^

" Everyone has a plan 'till they get punched in the mouth. " ~
Mike Tyson

by MidWayMonster54 on Oct 26, 2010 8:13 PM CDT up reply actions  

Moronic?

Thanks for that great critique.

I’m just posing a question, based on the fact that under Shanahan he was usually only reading half a field. And here in Chicago his responsibilities have been to read it all. Do I, you, or anyone really know if he can read the whole field?

Daunte Culpepper is an example of a QB that had a lot of success early in his career when he was in an offense where he was asked to only read half a field, but was exposed in other offenses. (And yes I know chucking it deep to Moss sure helped his stats, and Cutler has no Moss.)

Yes, Knox should have made a better effort to break up the pick on the slant, but Hall was playing with inside leverage, and the first thing I teach my QBs is if a DB is playing with inside leverage you do not throw the slant (unless your WR is physically bigger and stronger than the DB). There were other options on the play.

But can you honestly say you know without a shadow of a doubt that Jay Cutler can read defenses on the field? I can’t.

Moron out!

One time while a young lad, someone made fun of the Ditka name. One time.

by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Oct 27, 2010 8:50 AM CDT up reply actions  

I guess that wasn't the best choice of words...

but I do think you are being a bit extreme by posing the question as a binary opposition or mutual exclusion. Cutler’s abilities lie on a continuum and I got the sense you were making a blanket statement about something that isn’t an all or none situation. My apologies if I offended you, I did target the substance of your argument and not your person. I have immense respect for your insight and I count your posts among the better researched/reasoned on the sight.
As for Knox, my biggest criticism of him is that slant route. He never gets across the face of the DB (playing inside leverage or not). He should be able to either make that play or disrupt the INT and he simply pulls up.

IT'S NOT TOO LATE TO FIRE LOVIE (IT'S BACK BABY!)!!!

"There's a fine line between stupid, and clever!"

by LostInSTL on Oct 27, 2010 1:21 PM CDT up reply actions  

It's something I've been thinking the last few weeks

The way he’ll force throws, all the missed picks from the other teams. On a few occasions I’ve seen him misread cover 2, misread cover 4, and miss blitzers coming hot.

I’m sure some of it is his extreme confidence in his arm strength, but some of it very well could be he can’t quickly process the coverages he sees when scanning the entire field.

One time while a young lad, someone made fun of the Ditka name. One time.

by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Oct 27, 2010 1:30 PM CDT up reply actions  

SO I do get what you are getting at...

I actually see it from a different angle. I think it’s less of a question of “can he?” as it is a question of “does he want to?”. It plays more to the arrogance/confidence he has and to me is more fitting of what i do know about him. Martz would not be so effusive in his praise of Cutler’s mental abilities if he believed Cutler was a dolt. He would give some stupid football euphemism like “footbal IQ”. Cutler (rightly or wrongly) believes himself to be the best player on the offense and thus responsible for making the big plays happen. I get the sense that he feels he has to be the gunslinger because there isn’t another viable way to win. Arrogant, yes. Stupid, not really.

IT'S NOT TOO LATE TO FIRE LOVIE (IT'S BACK BABY!)!!!

"There's a fine line between stupid, and clever!"

by LostInSTL on Oct 27, 2010 4:20 PM CDT up reply actions  

I tend to agree with you on the slant

It did look like Knox gave up, but would have it mattered cause Hall was over-playing the short routes all game long. It’s a bad read by Jay, and probably secondary, a bad effort by Knox. There was absolutely no way Hester had a chance to break up the interception where he wasn’t even out of his break yet when the ball arrived.

Lost- I’m not sure if this was the other one you believe wasn’t Jay’s fault.

"Wish the opposite sex operated like NFL redzone does. Just let me know when I’m about to score, otherwise, don’t bother me." - Jenn Sterger

by propheteer on Oct 27, 2010 5:48 PM CDT up reply actions  

Moronic? No.

Just a different take. I have a completely different take on the slant than you do, but I wouldn’t say anything about moronic.

My take on it was that Johnny definitely gave up on the route. Period. But, even if he hadn’t, that play likely would have ended the same way. My big problem with this analysis is this though. Cutler wasn’t supposed to read that play. It was a quick timing slant. He was supposed to drop back and fire at a position. This is classic Martz playbook and is the reason for much of his successes and many of his failures. Hall pressed, played inside and through the route off. At that point, the only things that could have happened were interception and incompletion. But it’s not Cutlers job to determine that on this type of play. It’s his job to follow the play exactly, otherwise, it doesn’t work. On this play, taking the time to make reads takes more time than the play is scheduled to develop. That’s how short timing routes work.

People blaming this play on Cutler need to understand how this type of play is run. Conversely, people blaming the end result on Johnny Knox are missing the point as well. I wasn’t happy with Knox just giving up, but that has more to do with wanting him to play hard every down and follow through the best he can. Giving up too early is unacceptable. But by all but the slimmest of margins, this play would have ended the same way even if he hadn’t given up. The only real argument you could make is that he might have been able to prevent the INT if he followed through.

The play broke down fro two reasons. The defense was the right call, and Martz has no audible system in effect. Even the audible might not have helped, as the Corners did a good job of masking the press before the play.

I think one of the biggest biases in analysis is the tendency to forget that the other team has the ability to make plays and call effective counters. When our offense has a poor play, we always look entirely at what the offense did wrong and the offense sucked, at least on that play, because of it. But if that same play were reversed, and Chicago’s defense had INTed on the same exact way, the analysis here would not mention McNabb’s failure, but Jennings’ success. Hall played the position perfectly on that play, and the defensive call was the perfect counter. These plays happen to the best QBs and the best offenses. Manning threw 16 INTs last season and Drew Brees threw 4 against the Browns this weekend.2

I’m not saying that there isn’t something to be learned from these kinds of plays. Adjustments have to be made. But there is far to much reactionary analysis going on here. Cutler is learning his third system in 5 years and his second system in 2 years. And this isn’t exactly an easy system to learn. Did everyone really expect this system to click quickly with a inexperienced and outmatched offensive line, inexperienced receivers, underwhelming rushers and a QB learning his 3rd system in 5 years, none of whom have played in this system before? I think too much was expected to quickly, and that expectation was magnified by a 3-0 start.

Of course nobody can say beyond a shadow of a doubt that Cutler can read defenses, especially in this system (And systems have a bearing on reading defenses and reacting properly. Reading the defense is only half of the action.) and claiming that would be ludicrous. But, then, pretending to be able to glimpse knowledge of his ability either way, after 5½ games in a new system, is ludicrous.

The question is not. You, Lester, posed the question. You did not claim to have the answer. Moronic that is not.

in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.

by Timothy Hockemeyer on Oct 27, 2010 7:23 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

Wow , Rec'd for being thorough .

" Everyone has a plan 'till they get punched in the mouth. " ~
Mike Tyson

by MidWayMonster54 on Oct 27, 2010 8:52 PM CDT up reply actions  

It's not all on Jay

In fact the majority of the blame falls on the organization. U trade 2 draft pix n a solid dink n dunk game manager for this kid. Give him no protection, no recievers, an O coordinator that has no clue how to use him in Turner. He has worse yr of his career, now in the present u still give him no protection, no recievers again, and a new system to learn one of the most complicated ever. Two systems, two yrs, no line, no weapons, trade deadline comes n goes, no mankins, no vjack, didn’t make a play for mawae, didn’t make any trades to the raiders. The coaches are keystone at best, make no adjustments, consistently fielding teams that look lost on the field. U have a piss poor o line n the coaches do nothing in the way of gameplanning to fix it. No draws, abandoned screens, no misdirects, bootlegs, delays. Just drop back 5 or 7 steps n heave up a prayer. Everyone says Jay will b great if he buys into the system n bless his soul that’s wut he’s trying to do. Standing in there gettin hit every play. Yeah he makes mistakes but Brees threw 4 pics Sunday. It happens Cuttys had a good yr up till now. It’s Gonna b ok, next yr maybe we’ll have Ron Ryan , maybe Singletary to motivate. U know we’ll have new dlineman in the draft. Lol.

by TheGreatGrabowski on Oct 26, 2010 8:17 PM CDT via mobile reply actions  

I wonder this....

Cutler has actually done a fine job this season, until Sunday, of limiting INTs. Hall seemed to bring something out in him. I don’t know if it was a desire to prove that he could beat hall, or a desire to show faith in Knox to beat hall, or if it was just a matter of Knox saying to him in the huddle that if Jay tossed the ball to the spot, he could beat him.

The big problem with all of this is that there is no way to know the “why”. Why did Jay think Hall was vulnerable? What did Knox say in the huddle? What did Jay say in the huddle. It’s all kinds of fun to pretend we have the answers. But reality is that there is more to this than just Jay hucking the ball up in the air.

More importantly though. is this. Every QB, even the Mannings and the Favres and the Marinos and the Elways have games like this. Why is it that Jay went into this game with one of the Best INT percentages in the league (and left this game with a INT percentage right around Aaron Rodgers) and many seem so anxious to pile on Cutler?

Could he have played better? Yep. Is this one game going to make or break Jay Cutler or the Bears? Nope.

And was this the same discussions Bronco’s Fans were having after he started out worse than jay has over his first five years?

in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.

by Timothy Hockemeyer on Oct 26, 2010 8:51 PM CDT reply actions  

Drew brees 4picks to the browns on sunday

"We were freaking robbed!! Our defense totally dominated all day! What? we gave up nearly 500 yards on defense? Yeah but we stopped them on the 1 yrd line! Our D is awesome!!"

- Entire kool aid drinkin' Pride of Detroit site-

by tfrabotta on Oct 27, 2010 6:32 AM CDT up reply actions  

the BROWNS!

(Sing song)...Everybody Hates Rondo...

by T.Moore on Oct 27, 2010 8:29 AM CDT up reply actions  

You can't say anything bad about Bresus

he won a superbowl.

David Taylor's personal hype man. Check out his website unless you're a loser. http://www.cheekymonkeyart.com/

by Ditkavsworld on Oct 27, 2010 9:42 AM CDT up reply actions  

Who?

David Taylor's personal hype man. Check out his website unless you're a loser. http://www.cheekymonkeyart.com/

by Ditkavsworld on Oct 28, 2010 7:13 AM CDT up reply actions  

Not accurate

In addition to poor decision-making (which I think he has somewhat improved on), Cutler is NOT an accurate thrower.

Cutler misses a lot of wide-open guys.

In terms of accuracy, I would rank Cutler in the bottom 1/3 of NFL QBs.

by MakeHalasProud on Oct 26, 2010 9:32 PM CDT reply actions  

And I would disagree completely.

The problem with your argument is that until this year, Cutler was considered very accurate. What changed? Well, the Martz system has Jay throwing to spots instead of to receivers. This takes time to develop, as it requires as much or more out of the receivers as it does out of the QB. Look at last season, for example. It’s not like Jay was missing guys and thus getting intercepted. He was getting intercepted trying to thread holes that he shouldn’t have tried to thread.

Context is important.

in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.

by Timothy Hockemeyer on Oct 27, 2010 7:02 AM CDT up reply actions  

T-Train, you are the stats guru, do you have any stats on his accuracy?

I posted the other day that one of the disappointing things about Jay since he came over is his accuracy. I’m not talking about completely missing guys, as you described, but it seems to me that more often than not his throws are either behind the receivers or too high. This happened last year a lot as well. With the Martz offense, hitting guys in stride and allowing them to make plays is important and, like you, I always heard that Jay was extremely accurate but haven’t seen it yet.

Also, his reputation was good accuracy on the deep ball and in the last season and a half, that has been rare. In fact the only really accurate long ball I can remember this season was DA’s drop in the first game. I’m probably forgetting others but it seems like Knox and Hester never have the chance to run away from people because they have to wait for underthrown long passes.

Don’t know if anyone actually keeps stats like those but I figured if anyone would know, it would be you.

by BearFan611 on Oct 27, 2010 9:30 AM CDT up reply actions  

Unfortunately, no.

Probably because it is honestly to hard to interpret why a pass was errant. Was it the WR, was it the QB, was it a DB, was the QB running for his life, was it mistimed or was it a miscommunication? All of these factors and more play into accuracy at the NFL level.

The current completion percentage stat is inaccurate as it is. It includes balls thrown away and clock stops as well as insane catches by receivers who, other than for talent, had no business catching an inaccurate pass.

I would be nearly impossible to record those stats without knowing the play, the intent of the qb and who the incompletions were the fault of.

in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.

by Timothy Hockemeyer on Oct 27, 2010 5:12 PM CDT up reply actions  

I can tell you this....

The accuracy problems this year should have been expected. With WRs that that are inexperienced and not the best route runners and a QB who isn’t familiar with passing in a timing system, it was going to take time for these guys to get on the same page in this system. The timing of breaks in routes is crucial to this system, and the QB and the receiver have to be matched up well and know what each other is going to do for this system to work. That takes time and until it is down it makes both the QB and the receivers look worse than they are.

Another point is that on a percentage of the plays in the playbook, Cutler will not be responsible for making reads after the snap. The short timing routes are often faith routes in this system. The prime example is the short slant that Knox is blamed for. Knox gave up on a route than Cutler was supposed to throw at a specific position. While Johnny is taking a lot of heat for giving up, it might not have made a difference. This kind of playcall requires perfect timing and is a high risk type call. Hall got inside of Knox and disrupted the play. Even if Johnny had followed through, an incompletion is the best you can really hope for after the WR was misdirected. But on a quick timing slant, Cutler’s job is to have faith in the WR and throw the ball at a predetermined time. These are the routes that I have always had a problem with in the Martz system. They are meant to be a surprise to the defense and give athletic receivers like Hester and Knox the ball and some space, but when they fail, they often end up in turnovers, as this play did Sunday. This type of play is one of the reasons for high rates of turnovers in this system.

in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.

by Timothy Hockemeyer on Oct 27, 2010 5:26 PM CDT up reply actions  

I agree with your comments here but

I’m also referring to his accuracy last year as well. He always seems to be a step behind or a foot too high in his throws. I tried to look at some of his work in Denver but, as you can imagine, they are mostly highlights of plays where Marshall was making incredible grabs so I can’t say, with any accuracy, that he did it as much as he seems to now.

Are you surprised at all about the long throws and the lack of accuracy he has shown there? I was expecting a lot more out of him and his arm.

by BearFan611 on Oct 27, 2010 8:10 PM CDT up reply actions  

No, I'm really not.

I wouldn’t say that there were really any more of those with Jay than there are with any other QB. It is magnified to us because this is the guy we see week in and week out. McNabb had a few just like that this week, including Mannings INT.

Where I really have a problem is that he and the receivers just haven’t seemed to be able to get each others timing down. Some of this comes with the territory when dealing with receivers like Hester and Knox who are so very fast, and who haven’t really figured out how to run with consistent speed. I’ve noticed that you get a lot more errant passes targeting Knox and Hester than you do with Bennett and Aromashodu, and I’m thinking that might have a lot to do with it.

in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.

by Timothy Hockemeyer on Oct 28, 2010 7:07 AM CDT up reply actions  

Another comment on the Knox play...

obviously, I have no way of knowing this for sure but after watching it several times both at regular speed and slow motion, it almost looks like when Johnny saw that Hall had the inside position, he was about to make an adjustment and either sit down where he was or turn outside. Again, I don’t know that in Martz’ scheme these are legitimate options and reads that both the WR and QB have to make, but watch the play and see if it doesn’t look that way to you.

I agree, the ball was not thrown well whether he continued the original route or not, but I have to wonder if perhaps Knox made the correct read and Jay didn’t on this one.

by BearFan611 on Oct 27, 2010 8:16 PM CDT up reply actions  

I disagree completely.

I don’t think Knox read anything. I think he was throw off his route and gave up. But again, I don’t think it would have made a difference, short of maybe preventing the INT. This was a timing slant. Drop and throw, not read and react. This is a classic Martz play and it isn’t meant to be anything but Jay throwing to a spot and Knox being there, with both happening very quickly. When ohnny was knocked of the route, the play was busted immediately. That is the risk of that style play.

I originally blamed Knox on the game thread for the INT (as did Aikman in the broadcast) but after rewatching the game, it was pretty clear that this was a timed playcall and that it was really more a case of the defensive playcalling matching up well against the offensive playcalling, and Hall executing well. I don’t think there was really much Knox (or Cutler, for that matter) could have done differently without an audible system in place, and even then, the defense masked the coverage well, so the audible might not have made any different.

I see this one simply as knight takes bishop. It was a good defensive call executed well.

in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.

by Timothy Hockemeyer on Oct 28, 2010 7:14 AM CDT up reply actions  

For those that want to give up on Cutler

Who would you want to get to replace him? Just asking.

by Dick Butka on Oct 26, 2010 10:25 PM CDT reply actions  

Anybody says Kyle Orton and I'm done....

David Taylor's personal hype man. Check out his website unless you're a loser. http://www.cheekymonkeyart.com/

by Ditkavsworld on Oct 27, 2010 9:42 AM CDT up reply actions  

Kyle orton...

"We were freaking robbed!! Our defense totally dominated all day! What? we gave up nearly 500 yards on defense? Yeah but we stopped them on the 1 yrd line! Our D is awesome!!"

- Entire kool aid drinkin' Pride of Detroit site-

by tfrabotta on Oct 27, 2010 1:25 PM CDT up reply actions  

thats it!

(Sing song)...Everybody Hates Rondo...

by T.Moore on Oct 27, 2010 1:29 PM CDT up reply actions  

We are no longer friends please get out of my sandbox.

David Taylor's personal hype man. Check out his website unless you're a loser. http://www.cheekymonkeyart.com/

by Ditkavsworld on Oct 27, 2010 4:08 PM CDT up reply actions  

LOL

Can we still share the powerade??

"We were freaking robbed!! Our defense totally dominated all day! What? we gave up nearly 500 yards on defense? Yeah but we stopped them on the 1 yrd line! Our D is awesome!!"

- Entire kool aid drinkin' Pride of Detroit site-

by tfrabotta on Oct 28, 2010 2:15 PM CDT up reply actions  

Orton!

tfrabotta – you are awesome!

Seriously though, I would love to still have Kyle Orton. That guy gets better every year. Plus, we could have used those two 1st round picks on O-lineman.

The people who still hate on Orton are the same people who still think Grossman is a good QB.

I haven’t given-up on Cutler yet, but Orton is already a better QB and he continues to actually improve each season.

by MakeHalasProud on Oct 29, 2010 11:53 PM CDT up reply actions  

can i replace this Jay Cutler

with the one from Denver?

I think it’s obvious that Cutler’s considerable talents need refined by good coaching. So far, the bears don’t have that. He’d also benefit, like any qb, from a true #1 wr and a real offensive line.

I’m still not sure how to evaluate Cutler. He frustrates me, but I see the potential in his abilities and the upside is still enormous. The biggest problem is it’s hard to believe this organization can get the most out of him, at least under this current regime. We need new people in charge—starting at the very top

by kalmavet on Oct 27, 2010 10:11 AM CDT up reply actions  

If Angelo dosen't draft at least 2 OL

with his first 3 rounds I say we riot at Halas Hall

One time while a young lad, someone made fun of the Ditka name. One time.

by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Oct 27, 2010 10:51 AM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

If I send JA a stern email will that qualify as rioting?

David Taylor's personal hype man. Check out his website unless you're a loser. http://www.cheekymonkeyart.com/

by Ditkavsworld on Oct 27, 2010 11:43 AM CDT up reply actions  

I think it can happen

But some major changes need to be made. Martz has had 3 different QBs post 20 INT seasons. Angelo drafted mostly defensive players who are just guys as the offensive line got old. We have a coaching staff that benches 2 of their best pass-catching options (DA and Clark) and plays a 295-pound TE who isn’t much of a blocker. Why? Because he makes a lot of money and he’s Martz’s guy.

by Dick Butka on Oct 27, 2010 10:07 PM CDT up reply actions  

My overall take.....

From early on, when dealing with problems, we are taught one thing. The simplest solution is usually the right one. Not always, of course. But usually.

Our offensive line is the simplest solution.

There will still be problems, even if the line was replaced by 5 future hall-of-fame linemen. Hell, even in Brady’s season of perfection he wasn’t perfect, throwing 8 INTs. That just shows that even the best QBs in their best years made some mistakes. Even the best offenses have hiccups. But fixing the line would fix a lot.

I’ll go as far as to say this. It is impossible to accurately assess the offensive skill positions without fixing the line. You cannot gage Forte accurately behind this hot mess. You cannot gage the receiving corps when the QB cannot get the ball to them because he is running for his life. You cannot gage Cutler when he’s already been sacked 27 times in 5½ games, which equals his second highest total for a season, and falls just 8 shy of last season’s 35 sack count with 9 games remaining.

Some on this thread are talking about the number of games Cutler has lost. Bullhockey. How many of those games would we have been in without him? Some want to talk about his win loss record. Shipoopy. Cutler has put his teams in a position to win. Until this season, it was his defenses that failed him. His Pro Bowl season saw his defense giving away the 3rd most points in the league. Last season, his defense allowed the 6th most points by a Bears team in Chicago’s 90 seasons.

What does the future hold for Jay? No telling. I won’t stand here and claim that I know which direction Cutler is headed. There are too many factors. HCs, OCs, GMs, offensive linemen, receivers, rushing attacks. I just don’t know. But I do know when claims are made that are totally off base. And i do understand the game enough to know that way to much responsibility is being laid on Cutler for the offensive woes.

The simplest solution is usually the right one. Fix the damned line.

in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.

by Timothy Hockemeyer on Oct 27, 2010 7:48 PM CDT reply actions  

Again, I agree with most of this but the additional comment I'd make is...

while we definitely have to fix the line, right now it is what it is. With that in mind, Martz’ has to call plays that speak to the weaknesses in his personnel to help out and Jay has to checkdown quicker and not try to force the ball to alleviate some of the issues. My biggest issue is that they both seem to try and run the offense the way it’s designed even though the personnel doesn’t dictate that it can be done effectively under the circumstances.

by BearFan611 on Oct 27, 2010 8:21 PM CDT up reply actions  

The counterargument for this is.....

that if the team doesn’t run it’s offense,m it will never improve at running it’s offense. I’m not saying I necessarily agree with this or disagree, either. But, generally, the only way for a team to develop is to run the gameplan. If you run a different gameplan, you are developing the team differently.

I know that is counter-intuitive to the “win now” mentality. But it is more likely to develop the team more solidly in the long run.

That brings up another point, though. The coaching staff does not seem to be planning with urgency. They seem to be more patient than you would expect them to be with Lovie and the whole group on the hot seat. Do they know something we don’t? Do they maybe know that they will be here next year? And even if Smith doesn’t, what does Martz know? Has the FO told him they will give him more than one year to develop the players into the system? Because he isn’t coaching these gameplans like this might be his only year to audition for future jobs……

in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.

by Timothy Hockemeyer on Oct 28, 2010 7:02 AM CDT up reply actions  

Clearly he can't read defenses.

I’ve heard a lot of cock and bull about how he’s not ‘allowed’ to audible. Wahhat a crock. He’s the QB. It’s his team. If you’re the starting QB for a billion dollar franchise and you see something at the LOS then you’d better change things up or you’re not doing your job. As much as I dislike P Manning, he changes calls like a woman changes her mind. If you don’t audible you’re not adapting. Adapt or die, it’s that simple. I think he’s not making audibles because he’s just not as smart as everyone makes him out to be just because of the college he went to. Going to college doesn’t make you smart, and going to Yale doesn’t make you smarter …

by Wally&Mac on Oct 28, 2010 10:08 PM CDT reply actions  

How about Vanderbilt?

"44 years of football history and nothing to show for it. I wish I wasn’t banned at the Norseman.." - tfrabotta
"Fellas, what are they, unblockable? Is that the '85 Bears over there?" - Tom Coughlin, Giants '06 training camp
~~~ Check my profile for links for SB20 and America's Game: '85 Bears ~~~

by Spongie on Oct 29, 2010 4:30 AM CDT up reply actions  

lol.....

A perfect summary of the whole post.

in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.

by Timothy Hockemeyer on Oct 29, 2010 5:42 PM CDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Windy City Gridiron is the best independent site on the internet for breaking news, in-depth analysis, and hardcore discussion about the Chicago Bears

Community Guidelines

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Images_small
*A Modest Proposal

Recent FanPosts

Images-8_small
Yahoo Fantasy Football Update
Small
We may not know DT Nate Collins but the Chicago Bears do.
029_small
Is it time for a contract? Oh no, not another Matt Forte post...
Burlacher2_small
Is Winning Games a Specialty?
Burlacher2_small
Apparently, Defense Wins Championships...
Fox_small
Bad start for AJ Jenkins
Burlacher2_small
What's It Take to Win?
Jay_cutler_small
My Analysis and Grading of Phil Emery's 1st Off-Season as Bears' GM
Small
Will Cutler take the throne or is the bar set to high?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Windycity_small Adam T

189886_210123485665309_100000029768895_888721_5830650_n__1__small Dane Noble

Editors

Sackwatchcutler_small Lester A. Wiltfong Jr.

535321_3734130120778_1501804679_3253247_588486681_n_small David Taylor

Orange_shy_guy_small Steven Schweickert

Capture_small Kev H

Contributing Writers

Lincoln_small Sam Householder

Leprechaun_small Spongie

Polishsausage_small Steve Ronkowski

Icothgmts_small T.J. Shouse

Joe_20mantegna-bill_20swerski_small Superfans

P981d5c2_reasonably_small_small DaveGilbertNFL