Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: UFC 146 Predictions

Bears O.C. Mike Martz called a good game

CHICAGO - NOVEMBER 14: Kellen Davis #87 of the Chicago Bears gets his dunk on after being an afterthought by the Viking D on 3rd and inches.  Oops! (Photo by Jonathan Daniel/Getty Images)

The Bears were officially credited with 38 rushing plays (including the 5 Jay Cutler scrambles), and Cutler had 35 pass attempts.  That's pretty close to the 50/50 run/pass ratio some fans and critics were looking for.  The Vikings are good vs. both the run and the pass, so Mike Martz was probing his way around their D as the game wore on looking for cracks he could exploit.  He found them.  The Bears handled the Minnesota defense all day.  Robbie Gould missed a very makeable kick and Cutler gave away at least a chance at three more points with the crazy Red Zone pick.  I just loved Martz's reaction to the int.

Even though Martz had a more even play calling ratio, calling a balanced game for the sake of calling a balanced game is dumb.  I'm sure Lovie Smith has been in his ear about running a bit more, but he's being smart with his calls.  He's still trying to dictate to the defense by attacking and yet he's taking what the defense is giving him.  You can dust off what ever statistical argument showing that teams with X amount of runs win X amount of times that you'd like, but the context of those winning games is never taken into consideration.  Many times "Team A" has a lead heading into the 4th quarter, so they pile up 10-15 late runs trying to chew up the clock.  Teams leading tend to run the ball more than teams playing catchup.  Surprised?

Star-divide

Schematically, balance for balances sake goes against everything an offensive play caller is taught.  From an Xs and Os standpoint, a play caller has damn near every play called for a reason.  All the motion and shifting that Martz does is done for one of two reasons, to get the D to tip their hand, or to get the D to miss an assignment.  The offensive coaches are looking for any advantage they can find when the defense reacts or dosen't react to the presnap movement.   Running an off tackle run is pretty basic, but running an off tackle run after showing one look, shifting into another, then motioning away from your strength is another thing entirely.  It allows Martz to run a basic play, but to pick up valuable data for a later play.  It also allows him to run the same play, but from a myriad of looks.

I thought in the Buffalo game Martz ran a little too much.  At some point if the run isn't working, you have to move on (24 carries for 62 yards from Matt Forte and Chester Taylor).  But coming off the bye week I'm sure the Bears had a very strict game plan they wanted to execute.  Run the ball regardless because the Bills are so bad at stopping the run.  And even though they made a poignant effort to take away the Bears run game (why, I have no idea), the Bears still kept working at it.  The Bears coaching staff drove home a point that game.  They will try and run more.

The difference in the run game against the Vikings was they would pop a decent run every so often to keep Minnesota guessing.  Every time I thought Martz was close to being frustrated with the run, they'd get just enough to make a difference.  They didn't break any really long runs, but an 6 yard gain, a 10 yard gain, a 5 yard gain, a 4 yard gain, the little chunks came at opportune times in the flow of the game (Forte and Taylor went 32 for 102).  Then in the passing game Cutler would work underneath, he'd buy time to hit a receiver downfield, he'd take off and get yards on his own. 

I thought Martz got the better of Viking defensive coordinator Leslie Frazier on Sunday.  Martz did another good job in protecting Cutler by formation.  The Devin Hester TD was a good use of a pick to clear him over the middle.  The screen to Greg Olsen that was called back was a great call, as was the TD pass to Kellen DavisHow do you not have your defense watching out for a play action in that scenario.  Their safety was playing deep and over the top of Johnny Knox, the lone split receiver for Chicago.  Is it really necessary to cheat help to Knox?  Even the announcers on FOX we're calling for a play action on 3rd and inches, yet Minnesota didn't have a safety anywhere near the line, so they let Davis get his dunk on.

In my opinion, the missing link for the Bears offense to click has been the offensive line, and the last two weeks the line has looked better.  If the line is gelling Martz will be able to trust his guys to run the ball.  If the Bears can run successfully they'll be able to run more play action passes.  And if those two aspects to the offense are clicking the drop back game will be open, which will lead to the screens being more effective.  Keeping a defense guessing is a huge part of he Martz philosophy, and I can just see his wheels turning anticipating where this offense is heading.

Poll
Mike Martz Approval Rating: Round Five - Do you approve or disapprove of Mike Martz as the Bears OC?
Approve
505 votes
Disapprove
38 votes

543 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 62 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Well 100 % so far.

Ron Tuner can learn from Mike Martz.If something doesn’t work then fix it.Martz scheme wasn’t working so they made the appropriate adjustments.Turner did not change anything from his narrow minded play calling.

There's no substitute for guts.
-Paul Bear Bryant

by I love football! on Nov 16, 2010 11:19 AM CST reply actions  

Turner did not sway from his gameplan much

Especially in game adjustments.

If you go in the bathroom, turn off the lights, and say "Da Coach" 5 times while facing the mirror... Ditka will appear and slap the wussy right out of you.

by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Nov 16, 2010 11:35 AM CST up reply actions  

Are you suggesting that Turner had gameplanned?

Seems to me that he had one gameplan that he ran week after week. That’s one of the reasons he’s gone.

If you don't ask, you don't get. So get on with it already.

by Suffering from Chicago Sports on Nov 16, 2010 1:21 PM CST up reply actions  

Of course he did...

1st & 10 run up the middle…gain of 2

2nd & 8 run up the middle…gain of 1

3rd & 7 Bubble screen…gain of 1

4th & 6 Punt and hope like hell the defense can cause a turn over and give us a short field…

Unreasonable people make life difficult...

by WisBearsFan34 on Nov 16, 2010 1:52 PM CST up reply actions  

I'm going with cautious approval right now.

Mad Mike Martz can always rear his ugly head again. But I’m liking the less-Mad-Hatter style coming out of Martz recently. The last two games have been good and brilliant in order. I’m still a little bit perturbed by the lack of creative running options and by the not playing to a player’s obvious strengths. Forte is not a gut runner. Taylor doesn’t do any one thing spectacularly or terribly. Knox isn’t a precise route runner. Bennett isn’t big or quick. Hester doesn’t finish like he should. DevA’s hands are suspect. Olsen has toughness issues (but he’s working through those). I’m still amazed that Clark hasn’t seen the field, being probably our most well-rounded TE.

I’m happy with the OL’s progression, but that won’t be enough against Philly, NYJ, NE, or the Slack. They need to take the extra step. Webb’s little improv on the Olsen TD was nice to watch, but it was poor blocking form. Too many penalties on the home field, especially from Kreutz.

This week’s game scares me. The Fins are a creative team, and Lovie Smith teams tend to not do well against true creativity…

by Doshi on Nov 16, 2010 12:10 PM CST reply actions  

Until Clark

hands over the martz family photos of everyone naked dont think we will see Clark again barring injury…..For what ever reason after the packer game where Clark dropped the TD that was thrown behind him he has been in martz doghouse and he is not coming back IMO…..

Agree with some of your points. Forte and Taylor and avg RBs IMO not bad but not game changers or feared….IMO Knox (& particularly Cutler) seems to play better when the play breaks down and they have to improvise….re watching the game Omi and Webb would get beat up the field but Jay either stepped up or escaped the sack….but eh

Have to be honest I still do not like the martz hiring but the last 2 games he has been better….Keep it up for the remainder of the season and I just might vote approve one day (because I want to see it every time before I say martz has changed)……

Boo all you want but you know what….Deep down you know I am right!

- Mike Martz on how the feels about the fans

by CloudyFuture on Nov 16, 2010 12:20 PM CST up reply actions  

Can you expound on this a bit?
Lovie Smith teams tend to not do well against true creativity…

by Dane Noble on Nov 16, 2010 12:20 PM CST up reply actions  

Forte may not be a gut runner

but he sure as hell dosen’t have the speed to get outside.

If you go in the bathroom, turn off the lights, and say "Da Coach" 5 times while facing the mirror... Ditka will appear and slap the wussy right out of you.

by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Nov 16, 2010 12:26 PM CST up reply actions  

besides, if you always use one to run outside, and one to run inside.

eventually everyone is going to catch on.

Five foot three seems to thrive on his misery...

by awfullyquiet on Nov 16, 2010 10:56 PM CST up reply actions  

I dont think a teams creativity has anything to do with how well our d plays

We run the same defense we’ve always run and if everyone handles their assignments it doesnt matter what the other team does. We try to limit big plays, stop the run and force turnovers. We do that and all the creativity in the world isnt gonna help em.

When did Phil start playing rookies? With age brings wisdom lol

by EmmCeee on Nov 16, 2010 2:56 PM CST up reply actions  

All I needed , and screamed for , was for ....

…. Martz to call a balanced offense . Hes finally done that so I approve .

" Everyone has a plan 'till they get punched in the mouth. " ~
Mike Tyson

by MidWayMonster54 on Nov 16, 2010 12:45 PM CST reply actions  

Would you approve if he were balanced but losing?

If you go in the bathroom, turn off the lights, and say "Da Coach" 5 times while facing the mirror... Ditka will appear and slap the wussy right out of you.

by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Nov 16, 2010 12:52 PM CST up reply actions  

Depends on if ....

…. Martz was calling good stuff that just wasn’t being executed properly , but a win is a win . As much as I like a balanced offense the win is all that matters in the end . But balance has lead into 2 strait games where Jay got to see his recievers catch the ball instead of lookin up at whichever lineman is helping him up & to two strait wins . So balance is the key in my opinion .

" Everyone has a plan 'till they get punched in the mouth. " ~
Mike Tyson

by MidWayMonster54 on Nov 16, 2010 1:06 PM CST up reply actions  

I disagree.

The balanced playcall has allowed the line to begin the process of stabilizing.

Further, I think too little attention is being paid to the “Cutler effect”. Jay’s ability to scramble and make things happen when the blocking is breaking down has a HUGE impact on the ability of the defense to pursue. His ability to make plays with his feet freezes linebackers and forces safeties to stay home instead of cheating. This isn’t by design, and may, as the game progresses, effect play calling.

Balanced playcalling forces the opposing defense to honor the entire offense. That is, after all, kinda the point. Our chief play executioner (Cutler) plays with more confidence and effectiveness when things are mixed up more, just my humble opinion.

If you don't ask, you don't get. So get on with it already.

by Suffering from Chicago Sports on Nov 16, 2010 1:30 PM CST up reply actions  

I'm one of those favoring a balance between run and pass.

I’d agree that just doing it for the sake of balance itself is stupid unless you’re a devout Buddhist. The real point is just to run enough to keep the D from teeing off on Cutler every play, like in the Giants game. An unbalanced attack favoring the pass when you’re not protecting your QB also seems rather stupid.

by oripunk3485 on Nov 16, 2010 1:41 PM CST up reply actions  

Like I said many times before.

Martz is a smart guy who needs to be reeled in sometimes. He is starting to understand and make Cutler understand that you need to take what the defense gives and play with in yourself and call plays that suit the talent around you.

by Mandingo54 on Nov 16, 2010 12:48 PM CST reply actions  

I need to see more of what he did Sunday

week in and week out before I’ll approve. Someone said (sorry I don’t remember who) that this follows Martz pattern at his other coaching venues. Reel in the pass and go more run for a game or two and then go back to pass happy. Jury’s out for me.

If you can't laugh at yourself you must not be very funny.
I remain a pessimistically hopeful Bears fan.

by Just Dave on Nov 16, 2010 1:09 PM CST reply actions  

I was hoping it’d come from someone whose journalistic style tended towards negative hyperbole (take yer pick!) but, alas, Brad Biggs mentioned this.

"44 years of football history and nothing to show for it. I wish I wasn’t banned at the Norseman.." - tfrabotta
"Fellas, what are they, unblockable? Is that the '85 Bears over there?" - Tom Coughlin, Giants '06 training camp
~~~ Check my profile for links for SB20 and America's Game: '85 Bears ~~~

by Spongie on Nov 16, 2010 4:43 PM CST up reply actions  

Nope... well not yet

A basement dwelling ranked offense is not going to receive approval. Well maybe it will on these polls but if we are going to look at big picture, how can we approve?

I do give him credit for this last game. Not even so much the “balance” but for a good overall called game. This however does not make up for a season of wtf’s.

Winning is great for approval ratings but most of that winning is or should be credited to our D and ST play. Sorry but I would like to see at least a middle of the pack offense and consistent 3rd down conversions before stamping the “approval”.

by TheMan1 on Nov 16, 2010 1:54 PM CST via mobile reply actions  

martz

I think he deserves credit for the last 2 wins, sure, but we need to the balanced attack more often than just 2 games, especially with MIA’s ground attack, we need to keep them off the field. The last 2 games have been a step in the right direction, though.

by walterfan34 on Nov 16, 2010 1:58 PM CST reply actions  

Martz deserves alot of credit

He’s doing what nobody expected and said he couldnt do which is call a balanced game. We all know he loves to air it out but he’s even changed that up in recent weeks with shorter drops and quicker passes. Jay deserves a thumbs up to because he seems to be finding his “hot” receivers much better now than he was in the beginning of the season.

The fact that Martz is calling a more balanced game forces defenses to worry about the run instead of goin all out and attacking the qb ie Giants game plus it makes the job easier for the O-line where they have only giving up 2 sacks total in the last 2 games..I like the direction we’re headed and as long that line continues to improve we will be ok

When did Phil start playing rookies? With age brings wisdom lol

by EmmCeee on Nov 16, 2010 2:45 PM CST reply actions  

Does anyone else feel we really don't know what the "Martz Offense" can do yet?

It seems like a fairly large percentage of our completions are on plays where Cutler is improvising and the WR’s and Olsen are on a scramble drill rather than the precise patterns I remember Warner and his teams had success with. There haven’t been many really crisp timing routes that, I thought, this offense was predicated on. Just my opinion.

by BearFan611 on Nov 16, 2010 3:56 PM CST reply actions  

I noticed that too...

just not much precision in this offense. I made that case before Martz was hired. I figured Martz precision offense and Cutler risk-taking and improvisational nature wasn’t the best mix. But the issues for the Bears offense are not with Martz or Cutler. The O-line is mediocre on good days, the WRs are not great, and the RBs are average and too similar to matter. Going forward this season will be a odd-looking compromise between what Martz wants to do and what the offense is able to do. The 2 most recent games are probably the best middle ground. As the offense settles into a more consistent rhythm, they should be good enough to make it to the playoffs and be competitive enough to win. I think long term improvement will require a new HC and some added O-line and skill position talent upgrades.

IT'S NOT TOO LATE TO FIRE LOVIE (IT'S BACK BABY!)!!!

"There's a fine line between stupid, and clever!"

by LostInSTL on Nov 16, 2010 4:28 PM CST up reply actions  

Amen brother...

+1.

IT'S NOT TOO LATE TO FIRE LOVIE (IT'S BACK BABY!)!!!

"There's a fine line between stupid, and clever!"

by LostInSTL on Nov 16, 2010 6:58 PM CST up reply actions  

Oh brother

-1

Lovie is a Great Coach give him a contract extention!

by 62bearsthe best on Nov 16, 2010 8:13 PM CST up reply actions  

Oh well

+1 to firing Angelo

Lovie is a Great Coach give him a contract extention!

by 62bearsthe best on Nov 16, 2010 8:16 PM CST up reply actions  

So...

I’m not going to get a hallelujah from the congregation? ;>P

IT'S NOT TOO LATE TO FIRE LOVIE (IT'S BACK BABY!)!!!

"There's a fine line between stupid, and clever!"

by LostInSTL on Nov 17, 2010 8:15 AM CST up reply actions  

Let me tell you something BROTHER!!

When the world slips you a Jeffrey, stroke a furry wall.
- Aldous Snow

by Ditkavsworld on Nov 17, 2010 9:02 AM CST up reply actions   1 recs

On the similar RBs

Sometimes that can be beneficial as you can sub RBs without changing your gameplan. It just makes sure that RBs are fresh.

by DaHamsta on Nov 16, 2010 5:44 PM CST up reply actions  

Fair enough...

but they need to be better than just 3rd down backs. Taylor is just a more experienced version of Forte. Capable but not great. Taylor is a better blocker and short yardage guy, but Forte has better speed.

IT'S NOT TOO LATE TO FIRE LOVIE (IT'S BACK BABY!)!!!

"There's a fine line between stupid, and clever!"

by LostInSTL on Nov 16, 2010 6:57 PM CST up reply actions  

I think the biggest issue with the RB's is they don't have a tough, short yardage, grind-it-out back.

Perhaps the kid Unga was supposed to fill that role, but you would think they could have found someone else when he went down.

by BearFan611 on Nov 16, 2010 8:50 PM CST up reply actions  

When did Chester Taylor become a short yardage guy?

I’ve seen a bunch of people say this, and I’ve never thought of him as a move the pile type runner.

If you go in the bathroom, turn off the lights, and say "Da Coach" 5 times while facing the mirror... Ditka will appear and slap the wussy right out of you.

by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Nov 17, 2010 9:14 AM CST up reply actions  

He was kinda touted as a "third down back."

Typically as a fan I hope that 3rd down implies a short yardage situation. But I also know that a 3rd down back is the back that can block, run or receive. I think the whole “short yardage” comes from the implication.

If you can't laugh at yourself you must not be very funny.
I remain a pessimistically hopeful Bears fan.

by Just Dave on Nov 17, 2010 9:36 AM CST up reply actions  

It's the ability to get a first down...

on 3rd and short a la Marcus Allen. As opposed to Forte who cannot seem to get that 1-2 yards for a first down/touchdown. Not moving a pile but finding that small crease and getting enough for the first down/TD.

IT'S NOT TOO LATE TO FIRE LOVIE (IT'S BACK BABY!)!!!

"There's a fine line between stupid, and clever!"

by LostInSTL on Nov 17, 2010 9:54 AM CST up reply actions  

finding that small crease and getting enough for the first down/TD

Some day, a team will think outside of the box and sign an actual midget for this purpose.

"44 years of football history and nothing to show for it. I wish I wasn’t banned at the Norseman.." - tfrabotta
"Fellas, what are they, unblockable? Is that the '85 Bears over there?" - Tom Coughlin, Giants '06 training camp
~~~ Check my profile for links for SB20 and America's Game: '85 Bears ~~~

by Spongie on Nov 17, 2010 11:46 AM CST up reply actions  

I was thinking more along the lines of Mini-me. Hand him the ball and he’ll scamper through Olin Kreutz’ legs. The defense wouldn’t be able to see him until he pops through. First down!

"44 years of football history and nothing to show for it. I wish I wasn’t banned at the Norseman.." - tfrabotta
"Fellas, what are they, unblockable? Is that the '85 Bears over there?" - Tom Coughlin, Giants '06 training camp
~~~ Check my profile for links for SB20 and America's Game: '85 Bears ~~~

by Spongie on Nov 17, 2010 11:50 AM CST up reply actions  

For whatever reason...

I had the picture of said midget being thrown over the line, but under works well too.

IT'S NOT TOO LATE TO FIRE LOVIE (IT'S BACK BABY!)!!!

"There's a fine line between stupid, and clever!"

by LostInSTL on Nov 17, 2010 12:35 PM CST up reply actions  

Are there rules against that? If not…..

"44 years of football history and nothing to show for it. I wish I wasn’t banned at the Norseman.." - tfrabotta
"Fellas, what are they, unblockable? Is that the '85 Bears over there?" - Tom Coughlin, Giants '06 training camp
~~~ Check my profile for links for SB20 and America's Game: '85 Bears ~~~

by Spongie on Nov 17, 2010 2:47 PM CST up reply actions  

Does he still play for the Bears?

If you can't laugh at yourself you must not be very funny.
I remain a pessimistically hopeful Bears fan.

by Just Dave on Nov 17, 2010 12:13 PM CST up reply actions  

If you mean "play" as in water boy then yes.

When the world slips you a Jeffrey, stroke a furry wall.
- Aldous Snow

by Ditkavsworld on Nov 17, 2010 12:19 PM CST up reply actions  

Great Article Mr. Wiltfong!

One thing is certain, we are not seeing “the” Martz offense and the reason is the offensive line. As encouraging as the last two games were the offensive line is still not up to protecting JC on 5 and 7 step drops long enough for him to run “the” Martz offense. I would call Sundays running game a success against the Vikes, success in the passing game was due to Jay’s athletic ability. His mechanics were better also. He made two really bad decisions back to back ending in a INT in the endzone but the rest of his game was solid.

Lovie is a Great Coach give him a contract extention!

by 62bearsthe best on Nov 16, 2010 8:07 PM CST reply actions  

If you read a Martz playbook

and I have… you’ll see plenty of stuff other than the 5 and 7 step drops. His offensive philosophy is to stretch a field, so he’d like to take the deep drops to allow his receivers time to run deeper routes, but he’s capable of making adjustments.

If you go in the bathroom, turn off the lights, and say "Da Coach" 5 times while facing the mirror... Ditka will appear and slap the wussy right out of you.

by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Nov 17, 2010 9:16 AM CST up reply actions  

adjustments

the key to any success IMHO. I like how the pocket was moved at times and how Jay stepped up into it when the rush was closing in on him. Also, I noticed how the 3-5 step drop occurred on obvious blitz plays. And now on to the INT’s…I hope Jay improves quickly!

It's 106 miles to Chicago, we have a full tank of gas, 1/2 pack of cigarettes...it's dark, and we're wearing sunglasses.

by lastof12 on Nov 17, 2010 9:28 AM CST up reply actions  

He's won back my approval

He seems to have finally gotten it through his head that he doesn’t have the personnel to fully operate his scheme and has scaled back a little bit on what he wants to do. This past Sunday game probably was his best game from a play calling perspective this season.

by Dominique Blanton on Nov 16, 2010 8:15 PM CST reply actions  

"Moon" Mullins reports

that he heard Lovie and Tice sat down with Martz during the bye and convinced him that running the ball more was the way to go. Perhaps they sat down with Martz and told him that his system just was not going to work this year with this offensive line.

Lovie is a Great Coach give him a contract extention!

by 62bearsthe best on Nov 16, 2010 8:25 PM CST up reply actions  

I didn't know

a noogie was a submission move

by Dick Butka on Nov 16, 2010 11:16 PM CST up reply actions  

If administered correctly the noogie can be an equalizer.

When the world slips you a Jeffrey, stroke a furry wall.
- Aldous Snow

by Ditkavsworld on Nov 17, 2010 9:03 AM CST up reply actions  

Depends on who's administering the noogie

If you go in the bathroom, turn off the lights, and say "Da Coach" 5 times while facing the mirror... Ditka will appear and slap the wussy right out of you.

by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Nov 17, 2010 9:16 AM CST up reply actions  

Ditka is.

When the world slips you a Jeffrey, stroke a furry wall.
- Aldous Snow

by Ditkavsworld on Nov 17, 2010 12:19 PM CST up reply actions  

Then a tapout would be imminent

If you go in the bathroom, turn off the lights, and say "Da Coach" 5 times while facing the mirror... Ditka will appear and slap the wussy right out of you.

by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Nov 17, 2010 12:51 PM CST up reply actions  

Might need a funeral director.

When the world slips you a Jeffrey, stroke a furry wall.
- Aldous Snow

by Ditkavsworld on Nov 17, 2010 1:13 PM CST up reply actions  

Martz called a good game

But it doesn’t erase all the bad games he’s called. But apparently it has for others, glad to see some are more willing to forgive, but I’ve seen so many bad, bad calls, I’m just not happy at this point with Martz.

I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.

by Topher Doll on Nov 16, 2010 9:09 PM CST reply actions  

Love your sig

Every time I read your user name I have flash back of a Beatles song. “Bang, bang Maxwell’s silver hammer came down upon his head…..”
On a football note, I kinda agree….

If you can't laugh at yourself you must not be very funny.
I remain a pessimistically hopeful Bears fan.

by Just Dave on Nov 16, 2010 9:24 PM CST up reply actions  

Haha thanks

Maxwell’s silver hammer is a great song, sadly not the inspiration for my user name. And Winnie the Pooh rocks, my fiancee’s sister loves him.
On a football note, thanks. I did love what Martz did last game, it was a great called game, but for the same reason we say one bad game doesn’t a bad coordinator make, the same is true for good games. Martz has hardly impressed this season, as fans have said for majority of the season have said in their past polling, so I’m a bit hesitant to say he’s done a good job yet. If he calls plays like he did on Sunday the rest of the season, I will gladly change my opinion.

I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.

by Topher Doll on Nov 16, 2010 9:45 PM CST up reply actions  

I voted approve, and I've been one of his biggest critics

Martz does have quick passes, screens, rollouts, and shallow crosses in his playbook. He sometimes falls in love with the 7-step drop and the deep ball. Didn’t happen on Sunday. It was great to see him not afraid to run the ball even though the production was nothing special. It is definitely a factor in the improved line play. You have to keep defenses honest and make them defend the entire field.

by Dick Butka on Nov 16, 2010 11:24 PM CST reply actions  

Most often a playcaller

is as good as the team’s execution. Ron Turner wasn’t that bad…every playcaller takes too much credit and blame.

by jimribs on Nov 17, 2010 7:10 AM CST reply actions  

great point

If you go in the bathroom, turn off the lights, and say "Da Coach" 5 times while facing the mirror... Ditka will appear and slap the wussy right out of you.

by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Nov 17, 2010 9:17 AM CST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Windy City Gridiron is the best independent site on the internet for breaking news, in-depth analysis, and hardcore discussion about the Chicago Bears

Community Guidelines

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Images_small
*A Modest Proposal

Recent FanPosts

Images-8_small
Yahoo Fantasy Football Update
Small
We may not know DT Nate Collins but the Chicago Bears do.
029_small
Is it time for a contract? Oh no, not another Matt Forte post...
Burlacher2_small
Is Winning Games a Specialty?
Burlacher2_small
Apparently, Defense Wins Championships...
Fox_small
Bad start for AJ Jenkins
Burlacher2_small
What's It Take to Win?
Jay_cutler_small
My Analysis and Grading of Phil Emery's 1st Off-Season as Bears' GM
Small
Will Cutler take the throne or is the bar set to high?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Windycity_small Adam T

189886_210123485665309_100000029768895_888721_5830650_n__1__small Dane Noble

Editors

Sackwatchcutler_small Lester A. Wiltfong Jr.

535321_3734130120778_1501804679_3253247_588486681_n_small David Taylor

Orange_shy_guy_small Steven Schweickert

Capture_small Kev H

Contributing Writers

Lincoln_small Sam Householder

Leprechaun_small Spongie

Polishsausage_small Steve Ronkowski

Icothgmts_small T.J. Shouse

Joe_20mantegna-bill_20swerski_small Superfans

P981d5c2_reasonably_small_small DaveGilbertNFL