The Bears Den: November 16, 2010
...our next seven games are tough, but not as tough as the Packers.
The Bears players say they aren't fazed by the quick turnaround this week.
Brad Biggs shares his thoughts from the win against the Vikings.
Jake Long could play against the Bears Thursday, even with labrum damage.
David Haugh shows his softer side, and lauds Angelo's late round draft picks.
Rick Morrissey says he's not impressed with the Bears.
Treat yourself, or a Bears fan you love: Top-of-the-line Ditka Sweater Vest.
Mike Potash points out that only one of our wins have come against a winning team.
Sean Jensen talks about the Bears improvement in the 3rd down department.
Adjustments made during the Bye week are paying dividents right now.
John 'Moon' Mullin hands out his report card from the latest victory.
Moon also broaches the topic of not having a #1 WR, sort of.
WCG favorite Jim Mller gives his two cents on the victory over the Vikings.
Season-ending surgery remains an option for Lions QB Matt Stafford.
Kevin Seifet gives the Bears their weekly Free Head Exam.
A quick look at how we bottled up Adrian Peterson.
Bears are expecting a heavy does of the Wildcat versus the Dolphins.
Michael C. Wright says that Julius Peppers is slumping.
Dan Pompei broke down the film, and has his grades to hand out.
Jay Glazer's afterparty, with an appearence by Brian "The Deity" Urlacher.
119 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
"Only one of our wins has come against a winning team..."
So? That’s how they become losing teams!
In seriousness… I hate that argument, especially this year.
by Steven Schweickert on Nov 16, 2010 8:15 AM CST reply actions
Radio and TV Notes
Biggs on the Score:
- Good news Bears fans. Bears are 3 – 0 against Vick lead offensive teams
- Mully states that was the best QB performance that he has ever seen as far as passing and running last night
- Best teams left on the schedule come to Chicago that could help. We will see.
- All best NFC teams have flaws:
atl – outside atl they are venerable. D a question
nyg- lost to a bad dallas team
philly- D is a question
No clear cut best team in his view.
- Hanely talks about he had heard that the Bears did some self scouting finally saw what they had and changed the offense over the bye week
- Biggs states we will see if martz can stay the course. Went back and looked at martz last stops and he would do this for a couple of games then just get the itch again and throw it 80% again
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
lost the rest of my notes so going off the top of my head and what I remember for the rest
On CTL – Had DHaugh say that the Bears are over achieving so does not know how good they really are.
Kaplan agreed Moon disagreed saying there is no such thing IHO on over achieving and they get into a heated exchange on the subject
Moon states that he heard Lovie and or Angelo went to martz and told him that the offense had to change. Also that Mike Tice has more input into the offense and that accounts for the running attempts. They want to hit at least 30 a game if they can.
Dan McNeil
Still wants to the Bears to lose so Lovie is fired. His co host (Spiegl?) says he is happy with the wins and does not think Lovie gets fired now.
B&B
Bernstein does not know how good Bears are BUT the D is good. Boers still does not know.
Zaidman came on and talked about how all Jerry Angelo draft picks made plays on sunday and it gets tense as Zaidman tries to say Angelo drafted well and B&B laugh at him
Boo all you want but you know what….Deep down you know I am right!
- Mike Martz on how the feels about the fans
by CloudyFuture on Nov 16, 2010 8:21 AM CST reply actions 1 recs
I don't think this is the same Mike Vick though...
He used to be “First-read, not there, off I go!”
Now he’s taking the second and third reads instead of running immediately, and when he does take off, it’s even more dangerous cause he still has all that ability. He’s a lot more of a complete weapon now instead of a running back playing at QB. Andy Reid is just what he needed.
If Lovie and Co. gameplan for Vick to do nothing but run around, we’ll be in for a rude awakening. If Lovie and Co. realize Vick can actually pass the ball, we might be able to contain him.
by Steven Schweickert on Nov 16, 2010 8:30 AM CST up reply actions
I agree
was a monster and looked different the last 2 games…..Though I still get the Bears falcons game from 2005 in my head for some reason….
When the Bears played the falcons in 2005 it was like -10 degrees….Vick did not want any part of that game…..He stayed by the heater and hated going back onto the field…..To bad it only going to be 40 degrees when they play…..
Boo all you want but you know what….Deep down you know I am right!
- Mike Martz on how the feels about the fans
by CloudyFuture on Nov 16, 2010 8:41 AM CST up reply actions
It is a different Vick but the running threat is always there and you have to plan for it....
the Bears have had success in the past because Urlacher has been the “spy” and is one of the few LB’s athletic enough to contain Vick. I would expect to see a similar plan next week but, you’re right, they do have to respect his passing more now than in the past.
The Bears have success vs. Vick
because they have a fast team. You have to rally to the scrambler if he takes off and your D-Line has to rush him with contain in mind. The Bears have the speed to keep him in check.
If you go in the bathroom, turn off the lights, and say "Da Coach" 5 times while facing the mirror... Ditka will appear and slap the wussy right out of you.
by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Nov 16, 2010 9:20 AM CST up reply actions
They are good at swarming with that speed
by TheMan1 on Nov 16, 2010 11:08 AM CST via mobile up reply actions
The Bears have been very successful
against Vick in the past. This is definitely a time where that undersized but faster Defense thing helps us out. It will be much more complicated for Vick, escaping to the outside with Izzy and Peppers manning the edges.
Also the Bears have been pretty successful this year stopping the run when in their Nickel Defense. With all the speed that the Eagles have on their offense, I could see us playing a lot of Nickel and using Manning as a spy.
I have all the faith in the world in Urlacher that when we are in our base defense and he is the spy that he will get it done against Vick. Come back player of the year!
I really, really
am rooting for Urlacher to have a statement game against the Eagles. I’ve seen talk of and suspect in most peoples minds, outside of Bear Fandom, that Vick is the comeback player of the year. If Urlacher has a statement game against the Eagles and puts Vick on his back? That and playing the entire season, unlike Vick, could go a long way to swaying some of those votes.
The Bears hopefully should get some practice defending a Vick like team against the Dolphins. The dolphins might use their wildcat formation a bunch, at least they have in the past considering their QB woes. This should give the Defense a dry run defending against running plays from the QB position.
That and playing the Thursday game
gives the Bear “extra” rest before the Eagles game as long as extra time to prepare and game plan. But I think Favre said it best when he said the Bears play their defense and they play it well, they aren’t going to try and fool you, you just have to beat it.
When the world slips you a Jeffrey, stroke a furry wall.
- Aldous Snow
by Ditkavsworld on Nov 16, 2010 9:43 AM CST up reply actions
Good points
the rest should help a lot. I know the quick turn-around is probably tough, but on the flip side there is the benefit of the extra rest. Almost like a mini by-week.
The Bears really don’t do anything that fancy on defense. Got to like the way that Marinelli is handling his first stint and D-coordinator.
Yeah....
Marinelli may be saving Lovie Smith’s job.
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Nov 16, 2010 9:59 AM CST up reply actions
Sometimes you don't need to get fancy
just put your hand down and hit somebody, the rest will take care of itself. I think playing a banged up Miami team this week is a gift as long as they don’t over look them and look ahead to the Philly match up, which will probably get a ton of coverage unless Favre has a hang nail.
When the world slips you a Jeffrey, stroke a furry wall.
- Aldous Snow
by Ditkavsworld on Nov 16, 2010 10:00 AM CST up reply actions
I hope they don't start
looking ahead, after last night the Eagles have to be on their minds. Miami is the team in the NFL that was best situated in the event that they lost Henne and Pennington. I’m not sure that there is a QB drop-off going to Tyler Thigpen from those two. Plus no team runs the wildcat better than Miami.
Yeah...
I don’t see thigpen being as big a problem for miami as a battered Long and Wake. But I don’t see the Bears looking past a team that has cursed them for a bit now. The Bears have a 3-7 record against the Phins overall, a 2-5 record playing them in Miami and haven’t beaten them since 1997.
Interestingly enough, Miami was the team to hand Chicago it’s first loss in both of their Super Bowl seasons, Beating the Bears 38-24 in 1985 and 31-13 in 2006.
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Nov 16, 2010 10:23 AM CST up reply actions
I hadn't looked up
the stats, but I was commenting last night in another thread how Sun-Life stadium is cursed for the Bears. Even when playing well, they never seem to do better than 80% there.
So what you're saying is we want to lose to Miami
cause that will by default catapult us to the SB. Very interesting stat.
When the world slips you a Jeffrey, stroke a furry wall.
- Aldous Snow
by Ditkavsworld on Nov 16, 2010 10:37 AM CST up reply actions
Nope, cause it wouldn't be our first loss.
In ’85 it was our only loss and in ’06 they beat us for our first loss after we went 7-0 prior to that game. We should get a few of those this week. Teir fans love to rub in our faces how they were the wons that stopped us from going undefeated in both years.
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Nov 16, 2010 10:43 AM CST up reply actions
it's late for me. *ones, not wons.
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Nov 16, 2010 10:43 AM CST up reply actions
The Soldier Field turf should also help us...
I also think that the one of the most important factors for our defense to be successful is our offense staying on the field so the D is fresh and can maintain their speed advantage throughout the game. If Martz falls back into 80% passing and our third down conversions revert back to the league’s worst, the D will wear down.
To be successful
going forward, the Bears offense will definitely have to sustain drives. I think that the Bears will have to go into every game with the intention of having a balanced attack on offense. If for some reason Martz determines that more passing is needed as an in-game adjustment, like a shoot-out with the Patriots or Packers, then I’m fine with that. All the games should start out with the intention of being balanced, until we see what the opponent is going to give us, IMO.
Agreed about the turf, the great equalizer in Chicago, that should definitely slow down the Eagles speedy receivers. God know what it will do to Wes Welker?
Ops Also
on B&B
Bernstein said that “his guy” said that the Bears would most likely extend Lovie Smith if they should finish 8-8 or better since “they” are impressed with this. Lovie is angling for an extension. Also goes with what Moon has heard and what one “Bears insider” at another forum has said (they would have to finish 6-10 or worse for a coaching change to happen)……..
Boo all you want but you know what….Deep down you know I am right!
- Mike Martz on how the feels about the fans
by CloudyFuture on Nov 16, 2010 9:21 AM CST up reply actions
I just don't understand
How someone can want Lovie out…
He has coached the Bears to two division titles and a Super Bowl berth..
He’s the third winingest coach in Bears history.
He’s coached this Bears team, that some people said would go 2-14, to a 6-3 record so far.
Since Lovie has taken over in 04 the Bears lead the league in forced turnovers.
Lovie Smith coached Bears teams are 8-3 against Brett Favray.
Lovie Smith has kept his promise to beat the Packers. In his first 4 seasons he beat the Pack 6 out of 8 times.
So, my view on this, when you have something good, don’t let someone else have it.
Lovie Smith is the best coach the Bears have had in a VERY long time, since Ditka in the 80’s. Because lord knows after the 86 season Ditka’s coaching abilities dropped off big time.
So people need to open their eyes and see that the Bears aren’t that bad off with Lovie, not at all.
13. It's a magic number
by suckmyditka on Nov 16, 2010 8:30 AM CST reply actions 3 recs
If they miss the playoffs again then he should definitely be fired.
That would mean only two post season appearances out of 7 years, with 4 seasons in a row that they have missed. When you look at the other coaches they’ve had since Ditka (Wanny and Jauron), anybody would look good compared to those two morons but that doesn’t mean you’re good, just better than them.
Take into account the lack of player development, bad coaching decisions on several players (Hester, Manning, Mark Anderson, Rex), one of the worst records in the league on challenges, terrible game decisions, terrible assistant coaching choices, and his input in poor personnel choices (Pace, Archuletta), all of that says a bad job.
This whole “record against the Packers” thing is way overblown, in my opinion. If we still miss the playoffs but have a decent record against the cheeseheads, what does that do for us other than bragging rights. Ditto on the record against Favre, because part of that is the fact that those came at the end of his career (or what was supposed to be the end) so it’s not exactly going up against the Super Bowl Brett.
I don’t mean to be a jerk, but your arguments sound too much like settling because he was slightly better than his predecessors. I’m tired of our team accepting mediocre results. If they get into the playoffs and look strong doing it, then get at least one playoff win, then he deserves a shot at playing out the contract (please don’t extend it!!) and see if he can string two good seasons together.
Gotta back up 611 on this one...
I think Lovie is a great DC to run a Cover-2 defense if that’s what you want. His tenure as HC started well enough with a defensive core not of his choosing, but his ego made him believe he could do anything and he’s made a series of disastrous decisions since 2006 that have left the team lacking at too many positions with no realistic developmental core to speak of.
IT'S NOT TOO LATE TO FIRE LOVIE (IT'S BACK BABY!)!!!
"There's a fine line between stupid, and clever!"
Lovie's teams are about .500
Now how good are they again? Just because we have had crap for coaches for many years and one compares Lovie to the said crap, doesn’t make it any better.
One of if not the largest football markets.
5th highest payroll
Excellent defenses (oh except when Lovie called the plays as DC)
And still close to a .500 record?
by TheMan1 on Nov 16, 2010 11:17 AM CST via mobile up reply actions
I'm with you.
Lovie’s at least a decent head coach and the players respect him. Look no farther than Minny to see how important that is.
Agree
You can’t overstate how important it is for a coach to have the support of his players. Everyone outside the team hates Lovie, but you talk to any of his current or former players and they’ll tell you, to a man, that they would go to war for him.
Lovie’s got his flaws (and probably is better as a DC), but I think he’s done more good than bad. He’s shown a willingness to do whatever it takes get better, even demoting himself as defensive play-caller.
by NorthSideBearsFan on Nov 16, 2010 2:12 PM CST up reply actions
When Jauron was on the hotseat, they all talked about how they loved and respected him too.
Especially Urlacher. Minnesota is an extreme situation but if you had a coach who had them in the playoffs on a consistent basis, they would love and respect him more.
Some of the ’85 Bears hated Ditka but that worked out pretty well.
I rec'd b/c I tend to agree
We overachieve with Lovie because, by all accounts, we have mediocre talent. Ditka had how many Hall of Famers? Payton, Hampton, Dent (should be), Singletary. Plus he had a damn good QB for some of it in McMahon and other guys who were great or damn near Hall of Famers, like Hilenberg, Covert, Van Horne, Thayer, Neal Anderson, Leslie Frazier, Gary Fencik.
Who’s Lovie got? Other than the LBs, this team doesn’t have anyone who is truly great. He has some good players in Cutler and Forte and Knox but overall he hasn’t had the best stuff to work with compared to Ditka. Additionally, his most talented teams went to the playoffs (as they should have). So yeah he’s .500 mostly, but how bad could it have been if we had a worse coach, like Jaron or Wanny?
"I feel like the pieces are in place. But we have to execute...It's about execution. You have to execute. You have to have a scheme that facilitates the strengths of your players. If it doesn't, then it's a bad scheme. It's that simple. So we feel real good about the parts in place on offense."
"We feel very good about this football team. We felt very good about our football teams in the past and it's no different. You've got to go out there and you've got to do it."
-Jerry Angelo, Aug. 2, 2010
by Sam Householder on Nov 16, 2010 2:37 PM CST up reply actions
People are generally unhappy when teams aren't winning no matter who the coach
And we’ve expected better results since the Super Bowl season. So we have higher expectations that were dashed for several seasons.
There are certainly things we can fault Lovie for: challenges, some developmental decisions. But overall, I don’t think he’s a bad coach by any means. I don’t think he’s a great coach, but there are so few of those, that I’m happy with what we have. I think he’s done well with the tools provided (Angelo may be a different story…).
His single biggest mistake was.....
ditching the wrong Ron after the Super Bowl. And it wasn’t a small mistake. It was an arrogant mistake. Rivera was the guy who ran the defense like it was great. Smith got rid of him and what happened? He and Babich ran the defense into the ground. Marinelli has done a fine job this year, but it took 3 years of horrible to get back here.
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Nov 17, 2010 5:49 PM CST up reply actions
I agree with you suckmyditka but don't ask me to support Jerry Angelo
He deserves to have a chance to coach out his current contract, especially with Marinelli at DC and Martz at OC. This for all purposes is a building year, building an O-Line and a new offense in general. I don’t buy the rap that he doesn’t develope his players Manning came to us with little but speed to call his own and he starting to step up now. Hester lost is mojo in 08 and needed the time away from just returning kicks. Anderson only looked good playing next to a 100% Tommie Harris since Tommie got hurt and his play declined he had every opportunity and some solid coaching from Marinelli and couldn’t step up. Rex had career bear numbers pretty much the same as Orton’s both of those guys got thrown into a starting role before they were ready was Angelo and the ownership just too cheap to go out and sign a quality veteren to hold down the position until those guys could be coached up? These players don’t give up on Lovie like Wade Phillips did on him. I don’t understand fans who call for Lovie to be fired and Cutler traded weather they win or lose. They want to bring in a new head coach with no head coaching experience just for the sake of change.
Lovie is a Great Coach give him a contract extention!
by 62bearsthe best on Nov 16, 2010 3:24 PM CST up reply actions
I'll take this one from the opposing view point.
He has coached this team to towo playoff runs, two division titles in 6½ years, and might get one this year, and has coached us to one Super Loss. Ditka, in his first 6 years coached the Bears to 4 division crowns and 1 Super Win. Our fans are so used to bad coaching that a mediocre coach looks acceptable to some. Sorry, but not to me. Come on, after 6 seasons, the guy had one more winning season that Dave Wannstadt
It’s not difficult to be the third winningest coach in Bears history when you are also the third longest tendered coach in Bears history. Just to review, Dave Wannstadt was the Bears third winningest coach Prior to Smith. Should we have kept him, as well?
Sorry, but while the scheme may be Smith’s, Marinelli is coaching it like it was Rivera’s. That defense is why our team is 6-3. under Rivera, we were one of the strongest D’s in the league. Under The Lovie Smith Puppet Show in the three years after Smith summarily dismissed Rivera (can you remember a defensive coordinator ever being released after his defense, which had been top 3 for 2 straight years had just led it’s team to the Super Bowl?) the Defense was abysmal and 2009 saw the 6th most points allowed by a Bears defense in the teams 90 year history with Smith as DC. He screwed up, and he screwed up big. He took the strength of the team and made it a weakness with the only real change being coaching…….His Coaching.
His one big success, in my view has been his focus on turnovers. I won’t take that away from him. But let’s remember that the passing defense has focused on turnovers to the detriment of coverage. But that’s more philosophy, and I can see the idea behind it, and can even support it, to some extent.
The record against Farve is impressive and predictable. in his waning years, Favre hasn’t been nearly as dominant and Smith’s turnover mentality is the perfect defense to Favre. Give him enough rope and he will hang himself. And the best part is that it’s not like Smith has to alter what the team is doing because of Favre. In fact, his style might be the best matchup to Favre, period. Props for this.
Beating the Pack is the only real thing he has done that he said he would do. But, again, give him credit where it is due. But let’s not forget that since that 6-2 opening that you mentioned, Lovie has gone 2-3 against the Pack in the last 2½ years.
Some here are stating that Smith hasn’t had talent. That is utter BS. The ‘06 team had 8 Pro-Bowl players. And what talent has lacked has been as much his fault as Angelo’s. He has say in the draft picks and the FA acquisitions. Both he and Angelo have made that clear. He does not get absolved from the talent break. As a matter of fact, since his contract was renegotiated and he was given more power over the talent, the draft selections have gotten worse, not better. And other than Peppers, so have the FA acquisitions. Additionally, the fact that he hasn’t properly developed the talent he has been provided is just as big a factor in the talent level of this team as the players he has been provided.
Smith owns all of that. He owns the arrogance of the Rivera release and the 3 years of bad defense that followed. He owns the bad challenges. He owns, with Angelo, the player drafting and acquisitions. He owns the fact that his team hasn’t reached the playoffs since Rivera’s departure.
Turnovers are great, as are wins against Favre and the Packers. But if they don’t translate into Championships, or at least the playoffs, then what did it really matter?
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Nov 17, 2010 6:31 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
i'm sorry...
it’s late and i didn’t read all of this….
But i’m sure it’s well thought out and set up in just the right ways to make me look like an idiot.
Well done as usual babydoll
13. It's a magic number
by suckmyditka on Nov 17, 2010 10:53 PM CST up reply actions
Nope.
No idiot unveiling here. I agreed with some of your points and disagreed with others, then gave my viewpoint.
I will never tell, my friend. Your idiocy is always safe with me ;)
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Nov 18, 2010 6:28 AM CST up reply actions
If I could rec this more than once, I would.
"44 years of football history and nothing to show for it. I wish I wasn’t banned at the Norseman.." - tfrabotta
"Fellas, what are they, unblockable? Is that the '85 Bears over there?" - Tom Coughlin, Giants '06 training camp
~~~ Check my profile for links for SB20 and America's Game: '85 Bears ~~~
Thank you.....
Like rec’s, idiocy is cumulative but unlike rec’s idiocy is also exponential, and when you take Angelo’s idiocy and add Smith’s idiocy to it, you get underdeveloped talent that runs really fast and can jump out of pools.
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Nov 19, 2010 12:28 PM CST up reply actions
Here's an interesting note
Of all 32 teams in the league, only five teams have played 8 conference games in their first nine. The Bears, Raven, Patriots, Chiefs, and Panthers.
I don’t know why that’s interesting. Just is.
If I did what I love for a living, what would I do in my free time?
Writer at windycitygridiron.com {-/-} http://www.twitter.com/kdoggers
Well think about it.
Not only are the Bears 6-3 and on top of the divison, but they’re 5-3 against the conference. Most wildcard contenders are currently 4-1 or 4-2.
Should the Bears find themselves battling for the wild card and not just winning their division, that Redskins game could haunt them even more than it already does.
If I did what I love for a living, what would I do in my free time?
Writer at windycitygridiron.com {-/-} http://www.twitter.com/kdoggers
No Ditka Sweater Vest for me
They don’t have my size. Fellow WCG member Acydikeen told me about this website. nfljerseysupply.com (link pops). He and is wife bought jerseys and they are freakin sweet. He got the Peppers 40’s throwback and she got a navy Ditka. I was told they are seconds but they are so cheap it doesn’t bother me. The flaws are so small you can’t tell they are seconds.
And the more you buy, the cheaper they are. Acydikeen went in with a group of like 10 people and wound up paying around $30.
Just thought I had to share this excellent deal.
by boondock_saint812 on Nov 16, 2010 8:47 AM CST reply actions
Nice. We're going to put together a Holiday Bears Gifts post soon,
and as long as people can vouch for the website and product, I’ll include that in there too.
True Story
They’re the Replicant sewn on jerseys. Went with a group of people and ordered 10 together. Came out to $24 a jersey. No tax or shipping charges. You’re buying direct from the factory in China. So pleased I’m buying an Arron Rodgers (shudder) jersey for my father-in-law for Christmas. My Peppers throwback is killer.
Colt's fan friend - "This is our dog, we named her after Peyton Manning."
Boondocksaints812 - "You named her Bitch?!? Did you train her to lie down when you run towards her too?"
If Long plays with a Labrum injury
he’ll have a tough time lifting him left arm up to stop an outside pass rush.
If you go in the bathroom, turn off the lights, and say "Da Coach" 5 times while facing the mirror... Ditka will appear and slap the wussy right out of you.
by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Nov 16, 2010 9:26 AM CST reply actions
And I'm willing to bet that Pep would choose to line up there
and the hounds would be released so to speak.
When the world slips you a Jeffrey, stroke a furry wall.
- Aldous Snow
by Ditkavsworld on Nov 16, 2010 9:30 AM CST up reply actions
We need at least 10 wins... probably 11 to make the playoffs.
I can’t find 4 wins on our schedule…
"You win because of the quarterback. We have to get that position stabilized. We're fixated on that." -- Jerry Angelo (12.30.2008)
Jerry Angelo trades for Jay Cutler! (4.2.2009)
Didn't you say something similar to that....
during the pre-season? Was that you?
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Nov 16, 2010 9:34 AM CST up reply actions
and you couldn't find 6 wins in the first 9
If you go in the bathroom, turn off the lights, and say "Da Coach" 5 times while facing the mirror... Ditka will appear and slap the wussy right out of you.
by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Nov 16, 2010 9:39 AM CST up reply actions
I'm gonna throw this out there and if no one likes it throw it right back
“That’s why they play the game.”
When the world slips you a Jeffrey, stroke a furry wall.
- Aldous Snow
by Ditkavsworld on Nov 16, 2010 9:41 AM CST up reply actions
Well
you can play it on madden and go off that? …….Hmmm but still that would be playing a game…..Never mind I got nothing….
Boo all you want but you know what….Deep down you know I am right!
- Mike Martz on how the feels about the fans
by CloudyFuture on Nov 16, 2010 9:45 AM CST up reply actions
I appreciate the effor though.
Let me see if I have a peppermint for you.
When the world slips you a Jeffrey, stroke a furry wall.
- Aldous Snow
by Ditkavsworld on Nov 16, 2010 9:48 AM CST up reply actions
ooooooh! Me, too! Me, too!
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Nov 16, 2010 10:00 AM CST up reply actions
Hmmm
ok but it’s gonna be a minute, not sure how to give peppermints over the internet, but I do know try to jam them in the CD-ROM or USB port isn’t the answer.
When the world slips you a Jeffrey, stroke a furry wall.
- Aldous Snow
by Ditkavsworld on Nov 16, 2010 10:02 AM CST up reply actions
Here....like this
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Nov 16, 2010 10:04 AM CST up reply actions
Can't see pic at work. I can only imagine.
When the world slips you a Jeffrey, stroke a furry wall.
- Aldous Snow
by Ditkavsworld on Nov 16, 2010 10:37 AM CST up reply actions
a bowl of peppermints.
nothing fancy.
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Nov 16, 2010 10:44 AM CST up reply actions
A bowl of peppermints are always fancy.
When the world slips you a Jeffrey, stroke a furry wall.
- Aldous Snow
by Ditkavsworld on Nov 16, 2010 3:06 PM CST up reply actions
True
Not a packet of peppermints. Someone put them in a bowl.
"44 years of football history and nothing to show for it. I wish I wasn’t banned at the Norseman.." - tfrabotta
"Fellas, what are they, unblockable? Is that the '85 Bears over there?" - Tom Coughlin, Giants '06 training camp
~~~ Check my profile for links for SB20 and America's Game: '85 Bears ~~~
Honestly
thought they would only win 3 games coming off the bye and that was bills, vikings at home and the lions…..But eh you never know and considering the NFL this year…..Just get the party started when the Bears extend Lovie….
Boo all you want but you know what….Deep down you know I am right!
- Mike Martz on how the feels about the fans
by CloudyFuture on Nov 16, 2010 9:40 AM CST up reply actions
here you go.
Dolphins
Lions
Vikings
Jets
Found that for you.
If I did what I love for a living, what would I do in my free time?
Writer at windycitygridiron.com {-/-} http://www.twitter.com/kdoggers
by Kev H on Nov 16, 2010 9:44 AM CST via mobile up reply actions
We're really going to need 5
Because I see the Giants winning 10 games too. They will hold the tie breaker on us.
"You win because of the quarterback. We have to get that position stabilized. We're fixated on that." -- Jerry Angelo (12.30.2008)
Jerry Angelo trades for Jay Cutler! (4.2.2009)
That is pretty much
the four that I have as the most likely wins. This has been a strange year and any team is beatable any Sunday. I think the Bears will have to make a statement and beat the Pack the last game of the year. It is possible, if not likely, that the pack will have gotten as many wins as we have going into that game.
the last game of the season when we beat the Packers will be the 10th win!
Lovie is a Great Coach give him a contract extention!
by 62bearsthe best on Nov 16, 2010 3:28 PM CST up reply actions
Nah...
All we have to do is win Thursday, and win our division games. It’s quite possible that the WK17 game is going to be to see who takes the NFC North.
Simply put, I’d rather be playing Philly/NE/NYJ at home, than ATL/NE away, and SF at home.
Associate Writer - WindyCityGridiron.com - Artist formerly known as Sklz711
Well... let's take a look.
I got us beating a banged up Miami team, Detroit, and a Minnesota team that isn’t going to show up for the game. But, of course… those aren’t guarantees, as we’ve already lost to Seattle and Washington at home.
Find me one more win… PHI, NE, NYJ, @ GB.
"You win because of the quarterback. We have to get that position stabilized. We're fixated on that." -- Jerry Angelo (12.30.2008)
Jerry Angelo trades for Jay Cutler! (4.2.2009)
Take into account the Packers schedule,
and we could very much win the North with both us and them at 10-6.
I would loooooooove that.
When the world slips you a Jeffrey, stroke a furry wall.
- Aldous Snow
by Ditkavsworld on Nov 16, 2010 10:01 AM CST up reply actions
Exactly....
It’s like people forget that the Pack have the same schedule minus the two same position conference games.
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Nov 16, 2010 10:02 AM CST up reply actions
Exactly,
makes the Miami game important as Miami has already beaten the Pack. Helps position us, by neutralizing our loss to the Giants, in a tie scenario with the Pack.
Exactly...
I just wanted one more comment that started off with Exactly.
If I did what I love for a living, what would I do in my free time?
Writer at windycitygridiron.com {-/-} http://www.twitter.com/kdoggers
by Kev H on Nov 16, 2010 12:21 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Exactly
Here’s just one more.
If you don't ask, you don't get. So get on with it already.
by Suffering from Chicago Sports on Nov 16, 2010 1:45 PM CST up reply actions
Exactly
I’m such a lemming…..
When the world slips you a Jeffrey, stroke a furry wall.
- Aldous Snow
by Ditkavsworld on Nov 16, 2010 3:07 PM CST up reply actions
Exactly
what I was thinking.
If you can't laugh at yourself you must not be very funny.
I remain a pessimistically hopeful Bears fan.
Exactly
how i stood last night when i was left footed in a rain storm while i was being trampled by a herd of purple giraffaloes .
13. It's a magic number
Exactly
the number of pigeons it takes to make a feather pillow.
If you can't laugh at yourself you must not be very funny.
I remain a pessimistically hopeful Bears fan.
Exactly
what I thought…..
Boo all you want but you know what….Deep down you know I am right!
- Mike Martz on how the feels about the fans
by CloudyFuture on Nov 16, 2010 10:11 PM CST up reply actions
Exactly
what I stated in a different tense above.
If you can't laugh at yourself you must not be very funny.
I remain a pessimistically hopeful Bears fan.
Exactly
why would you say that, is it the purple girrafaloes?
When the world slips you a Jeffrey, stroke a furry wall.
- Aldous Snow
by Ditkavsworld on Nov 17, 2010 8:42 AM CST up reply actions
Exactly
I love you guys!
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Nov 17, 2010 5:39 PM CST up reply actions
Exactly
How long do you think this should go on?
When the world slips you a Jeffrey, stroke a furry wall.
- Aldous Snow
by Ditkavsworld on Nov 18, 2010 3:31 PM CST up reply actions
Exactly
Which is at least a few more times….
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Nov 18, 2010 5:54 PM CST up reply actions
Which one of those teams in unbeatable, Sackman?
NE lost to the Browns and the Jets. Jets lost to the Ravens and the Pack, who we already beat. Philly lost to Skins, Titans and the Pack, who we already beat. And the Pack have lost to the Skins, the Phins and…….Da Bears.
So why can’t we beat these teams? We already beat one of them.
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Nov 16, 2010 10:49 AM CST up reply actions 1 recs
+1
Any one of them is beatable.
Lest we forget the Pack are just one injury away from disaster.
If you don't ask, you don't get. So get on with it already.
by Suffering from Chicago Sports on Nov 16, 2010 1:48 PM CST up reply actions
optimistic cynic
its going to be tough the rest of the way but their is no real dominant team this season so anything is possible and the team is improving so keep the faith and watch with one eye open and the other cringing!!
Honestly
I only see te Bers really losing two games the rest of the way (although guess work .. never… works)
Pats and the Eagles will be the toughest two games left.
The lions just suck. Vikes suck. We have the Packs number. Jets pass defense is not great.
13. It's a magic number
Phased out works
At least according to Merrian-Webster
If you go in the bathroom, turn off the lights, and say "Da Coach" 5 times while facing the mirror... Ditka will appear and slap the wussy right out of you.
by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Nov 16, 2010 1:22 PM CST up reply actions
…our next seven games are tough, but not as tough as the Packers.
Not as tough as the Packers, or not as tough as the Packers’ next seven games? Not nitpicking, just wondering.
"44 years of football history and nothing to show for it. I wish I wasn’t banned at the Norseman.." - tfrabotta
"Fellas, what are they, unblockable? Is that the '85 Bears over there?" - Tom Coughlin, Giants '06 training camp
~~~ Check my profile for links for SB20 and America's Game: '85 Bears ~~~
I wasn’t sure if you were saying the Packers were a tough team for getting to where they are despite all the injuries. Have to give them that much.
"44 years of football history and nothing to show for it. I wish I wasn’t banned at the Norseman.." - tfrabotta
"Fellas, what are they, unblockable? Is that the '85 Bears over there?" - Tom Coughlin, Giants '06 training camp
~~~ Check my profile for links for SB20 and America's Game: '85 Bears ~~~
Hey, I've been saying for 2.5 years that the Pack was putting together a machine...
They’re going to be a force to be reckoned with for the next few seasons. They are young, tough, and very well-coached. I ain’t scared to give them their due.
Packer lover!
Dane and Aaron sitting in a tree….
If you can't laugh at yourself you must not be very funny.
I remain a pessimistically hopeful Bears fan.
.... then Aaron fell out of the tree....
and all you hear is Dane whistling and looking away.
When the world slips you a Jeffrey, stroke a furry wall.
- Aldous Snow
by Ditkavsworld on Nov 17, 2010 8:43 AM CST up reply actions
Both nimrod!
Sorry Dane I had to….
If you can't laugh at yourself you must not be very funny.
I remain a pessimistically hopeful Bears fan.
Eh, smartguy huh?
Why I aughta…….
If you don't ask, you don't get. So get on with it already.
by Suffering from Chicago Sports on Nov 16, 2010 1:49 PM CST up reply actions
Dear Rick Morrissey,
I’m not impressed with you either.
by oripunk3485 on Nov 16, 2010 2:02 PM CST reply actions 1 recs
On the contrary
I thought Morrissey’s snarky-douchebag skills were in rare form today.
by NorthSideBearsFan on Nov 16, 2010 2:42 PM CST up reply actions
Peppers is having one of his best seasons ever vs. the run
and is still forcing lots of QB pressure, whether he get’s the sack or not is immaterial, saying he is slumping is pretty stupid.
Rick Morrisey's article is absurd
Why do I even read this guys crap? All it did was piss me off. He just reminds me of all the aspiring sports writers I worked with in college that really made me realize that sports writers are all just egotistical a-holes.
OK, I’ll buy into the Bears not having beat a complete opponent but I think that to throw the Vikings out as some awful team is a little unfair to the Bears. Divisional opponents know each other better than anybody and so I think beating the Vikings soundly wasn’t something that should have been a given. By the same token I tend to give the Bears a pass for winning close against the Lions.
Overall I just think his argument was weak, the Bears can only play the teams on their schedule and frankly I want them to win 4 more games just so Morrissey can make up more stupid reasons to kick them around.
"I feel like the pieces are in place. But we have to execute...It's about execution. You have to execute. You have to have a scheme that facilitates the strengths of your players. If it doesn't, then it's a bad scheme. It's that simple. So we feel real good about the parts in place on offense."
"We feel very good about this football team. We felt very good about our football teams in the past and it's no different. You've got to go out there and you've got to do it."
-Jerry Angelo, Aug. 2, 2010
by Sam Householder on Nov 16, 2010 2:44 PM CST reply actions
like the commentator on ESPN who said the Bears
were the worst 5-3 team ever, and now they are 6-3 rolling his eyes like a silent film star.
Lovie is a Great Coach give him a contract extention!
by 62bearsthe best on Nov 16, 2010 3:35 PM CST up reply actions
According to the Bleacher Report..
The Chicago Bears are the worst 6-3 team in NFL history.
We shall continue being the Rodney Dangerfield of the NFL.. /sigh
Bear down Chicago!
Give it up for the boys in blue, USAF
by Jonathan Thompson on Nov 16, 2010 7:37 PM CST up reply actions
I'd be okay if these words were never used again on WCG:
According to the Bleacher Report..
Unless of course it is to make fun of them























