Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Trent Richardson Interviews Fellow Brown Brandon Weeden

How the Chicago Bears can slow down Michael Vick

Photo

Yes, I only said "slow down" for a reason.  I don't think he can be stopped.  I think the most difficult thing to game plan against in football is a scrambling quarterback.  You can devise ways to take away pet plays or to take away a stud running back.  You can figure out how to bottle up a top receiving threat or to take away a teams blitz, but stopping a scrambler from running wild is tough.

Think about it, a scrambling QB does the majority of his damage when a play breaks down.  At that point there's no accounting for where a defense ends up, and when he takes off running his athleticism takes over.  Do you put a spy on Michael Vick and take a defender away from their pass coverage responsibility?  You could, but any offensive coach will trust his guy (especially if his guy is as quick and shifty as Vick) to make a move and beat a defender one on one.

I don't think the Bears will alter their their defensive approach much to account for Vick.  Other than practicing against a scout team QB that will take off (Does Caleb Hanie get that gig?), and of course pounding into their heads to be fundamentally sound in their play this Sunday.

Star-divide

I highly doubt the Bears will spy Vick.  With the overall speed of their linebackers and their defense in general, it makes no sense to devote Brian Urlacher or any other player exclusively to Vick.  Expect a lot of zone coverages this week with the under part of the zone looking to rally to Vick if he takes off.  As a lefty, Vick is more comfortable throwing down field when running to his left, so if he's scrambling left the Bears have to maintain their zone depth a little longer but they can still squeeze to the sidelines.  Also on those left scrambles Vick will look deep. The safeties can't get caught sneaking up to early on the threat of a run, stay deeper than the deepest until Vick crosses the line of scrimmage or chance getting burned by his big time arm.

If he's running right, as pointed out by Cris Collinsworth on Sunday Night Football, he's more prone to tuck it and run.  The backside of the zone when Vick is scrambling to his right has to squeeze into the middle allowing the middle to attack Vick.  If Vick completes a throw back to the left across his body the Bears will live with it.

So why zone as opposed to man to man?  Two reasons, the most important being that zone is what the Bears do best.  Tampa 2, Cover 3, and the occasional Cover 4 (or quarters coverage) mixed in will hopefully confuse Vick.  The underneath zone will set the depth of their zone based on the drop the QB takes, thus all eyes are usually on the QB.  And if all eyes are forward they'll see Vick scramble and they'll be quicker coming up to punish him.  The second reason is that you don't want your defenders chasing receivers with their backs to the line of scrimmage, because that's when a scramble will kill you.

The Bears front 4 have been much better this season at generating pressure, and coming off a 6 sack performance, they hope to be hitting their stride.  Whoever is taking the outside rush this week has to be cognizant of containing Vick.  It'll either be the defensive ends or someone blitzing off the edge, as I wouldn't expect too many DT/DE twists this week. You'd rather not put your DT's in a position to have to contain.

Going straight at Michael Vick when rushing off the edge isn't going to work, the Bears have to rush him while being mindful of where the help is.  In a straight 4 man rush the defensive ends (if they have a shot at a sack) have to attack the deepest shoulder in his drop. 

For example, if Julius Peppers is rushing from the defense's left DE position (lefty Vick's blindside) and he has Vick in his sights for a sack, he has to attack his left, or deepest, side.  If Vick feels the pressure, he either has to step up in the pocket (in which case you hope there is pressure up the middle) or take off to to the offensive's left.  Trying to spin back to his right and he'll end up in Peppers' arms.

If there is any pressure at all, Vick is gonna make a move, you have to anticipate it and pursue accordingly.  If the Bears bring a blitz up the gut, the DE's have to be aware that Vick will try and get outside the pocket and they must stay disciplined in their contain, even if it means not beating the offensive tackle.  Box the corner and keep your outside shoulder free.  If a LB or DB blitzes off the edge then the DE to the blitz's side can take a more direct approach or even make an inside move to get to the QB.  But under no circumstances can the DE come with an inside move when there is no help to his outside.

I know we'd all like to see Vick take some big shots and be punished when he does run, but the Bears have to break down and make a sure tackle.  Fundamentals.  He has the quickness to make defenders miss, so if they get caught lining up for the knock out blow he could easily slip the tackle and pick up a few more yards.

One last aspect to slowing down Vick is the Bears offense controlling the clock and keeping him on the sideline.  The last few weeks the Bears offense has done a good job sustaining drives, so I'd expect Mike Martz to keep up his commitment to the run game.  Their offensive line is much improved so it does make sense to pound away a bit.

Vick will get his.  He's that good.  But the Bears need to stick to their game plan and not panic.  Take their read steps, drop into position, contain on every play, and rally to him when he does take off.

Comment 39 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

While the strategy of mixing coverages...

is one piece of the puzzle to beating M Vick et al, The Bears style of defense is exactly what works best against Vick and the Eagles (see the Giants game). I see it as a favorable matchup for the Bears and I expect the Bears D will handle Vick well. The Bears will keep everything in front of them and have been tackling well all season. McCoy is the X factor to me; he can get lost in the middle of that line and cut back for a big run. The speed of the Eagles WRs will be negated by the 2-deep safety base and nickel packages. The Bears defense is fast and the Eagles are not a big grind it out offense, so for every big play the Eagles offense makes, the Bears defense will counter with its own big play.
This game will turn on how well the Bears offense attacks the Eagles defense. If the O-line can get a rhythm running the football early and Cutler can refrain from making bad throws/decisions early, then the Bears should be able to grind out enough points to win. Assante Samuel is the x-factor in this matchup. If Cutler gets anxious and tries to force the ball, Samuel can turn the game with a pick-6 quickly. This will be a pivotal game for the Bears, if they win, they will keep pressure on GB and establish a tie breaker for the wild card with the Eagles. I think the Bears need to show they can win at home against a good NFC rival and I expect that they will. My guess is the Bears win 16-13 in a tight but sloppy game.

IT'S NOT TOO LATE TO FIRE LOVIE (IT'S BACK BABY!)!!!

"There's a fine line between stupid, and clever!"

by LostInSTL on Nov 25, 2010 7:59 AM CST reply actions  

If we can continue to run the ball

We win this game. I like how our defense matches up against Vick and the Philly offense – because we’ve been playing the run well all year. He’ll get a few big plays, but if we can be disciplined and stay in our zones and gaps, then I think we hold them to 14-21 points. It should be a close game.

by JimmyMack on Nov 25, 2010 8:51 AM CST up reply actions  

I don't think The bears will devote Urlacher to "spy" either.

But i see them assigning him to that position fairly often. I don’t see Marinelli as the type of guy who won’t alter the gameplan for a guy like Vick.

The one option I see that has a chance of happening that I didn’t see you mention is the option of the Bears actually rushing fewer men and dropping a lineman into coverage. Im not saying that this is going to happen evvery down, but I do think that the Bears will do this more than usual.

The thing everyone has tried to do is to pressure Vick into a mistake. That is usually a sound strategy, but I’m not so sure it is a great idea against Vick, as that seems to be when he does his best work. I spent a lot of time this week watching Vick, and I’m starting to think the best way to beat Vick is to bring pressure, but not to over-do it. If Vick gets just enough time, he makes mistakes. Too much time and he will kill you with his new found passing ability and if you get to him to quickly, he seems to be the most adept QB at turning it into a big play with his feet. But getting just enough pressure to him seems to leave him indecisive, and that is where I think the best chance against him lies.

Dropping a Linemen into a short zone with Urlacher in a spy situation leaves little for Vick to do but fold when the pressure does get there. This will not work on every play, and it will have to be disguised well when it is used, but I thinnk it could be highly effective.

Just my 2 cents. What do you think, Les?

in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.

by Timothy Hockemeyer on Nov 25, 2010 8:21 AM CST reply actions  

Do the Bears rush just 3?

I don’t think I can remember them doing that. They have done some zone blitz stuff by dropping a lineman and bring a blitzer to replace the missed rusher

If you go in the bathroom, turn off the lights, and say "Da Coach" 5 times while facing the mirror... Ditka will appear and slap the wussy right out of you.

by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Nov 25, 2010 11:45 AM CST up reply actions  

I don't recall it either....

But I actually see Marinelli as smart enough to work it in if he thought it was worth it, and I don’t see Smith vetoing the idea.

in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.

by Timothy Hockemeyer on Nov 25, 2010 10:00 PM CST up reply actions  

Unlike in the past 10 games

Sacks from our defensive line will be a necessity. They can’t afford to let Vick loose out of the pocket and give him a chance to develop any big gains on the move.

"Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win."

by GriggsBriggs on Nov 25, 2010 10:47 PM CST up reply actions  

In his career, Vick has played poorly against Indy and Chicago,

two generally fast teams. Even in 10 games against the Bucks, Vick has 75.4 passer rating.

That doesn’t mean he will take a turd on Sunday, but it certainly does bode well for the Bears.

A DRaysBay writer from Cubs Stats and Twitter @BradleyWoodrum

by BWoodrum on Nov 25, 2010 8:23 AM CST reply actions  

When he runs, and you have the opportunity to hit him, knock the snot out of him.

The crappy field should slow him down some too. Also, Vick doesn’t do very well outdoors in late November and December. What’s the forecast for game time?

by BigGeorgeTX on Nov 25, 2010 8:53 AM CST reply actions  

Lester, you point out our primary defense in the 2nd to last paragraph

Keep Vick on the sidelines. No better defense than to keep him off the field.

Great post, insightful, as always.

If you don't ask, you don't get. So get on with it already.

by Suffering from Chicago Sports on Nov 25, 2010 9:02 AM CST reply actions  

Yes to this...

The Eagle defense, especially up front, looks light in the booty. If that’s the case, the best thing is for Martz and Cutler to feed the Iggles a hearty helping for Forte and Taylor.

Excuse me for my bellicosity. And spelling. Bellicosity and spelling.

by Blackheartnopants on Nov 25, 2010 10:42 AM CST up reply actions  

It’s actually been really good against the run recently…

Formerly... "You don't have to be sweet, to be good"

by Ed Van Chimp on Nov 25, 2010 3:52 PM CST up reply actions  

this pissed me off this morning

“The Bears would have to collapse down the stretch for his winning-season jinx to continue. They need help for the playoffs, but they’re certainly in reach.” http://sports.espn.go.com/chicago/nfl/columns/story?id=5848301

last time i checked we were 7-3 leading our division
all week we have heard about the eagles, vick, eagles, vick
Bears defense:
1st in points allowed
3rd in total yrds
2nd in rush defense
WTF are people treating us like we are the bills…
yesterday on nfl network they broke down how great the jets are and how they are winning games in the last few minutes
said the jets are a great team and great teams find ways to win…
the ONLY above 500 team they beat were the patriots
http://espn.go.com/nfl/team/schedule/_/name/nyj/year/2010/new-york-jets and yet they are such a great team…

Woooo
hoooooooo! BEARS WAVE!!:"ø¤º°¨ ¨°º¤ LETS GO !¤¤º°¨BEARS
¨°º¤øº¤ø"¸¸ø¤º°¨"ø¤º°¨ ¨°ºL-E-T-S GO!"ø¤º°¨
¨°º¤BEARS!¸"ø¤º°¨¨°º¤øºL-E-T-S
GO!¤¤º°¨ ¨°º¤øº¤ø"¸¸ø¤º°¨BEARS WAVE:"ø¤º°¨¨°º¤KEEP THE WAVE GOING
...¸"ø¤º°¨ ¨°º¤øº LETS GO BEARS!¤¤º BEARS WAVE!!:"ø¤º°¨ ¨°º¤KEEP THE WAVE
GOING ¸"ø¤º°¨ ¨°º¤øº LETS GO BEARS!¤¤º°¨¨°º¤øº¤......ø"¸ if your not a
BEARS fan.... KICK ROCKS!!!! ♥

by Tommy Ohyeah Mcduffie on Nov 25, 2010 9:03 AM CST reply actions  

That's what you get for listening to the "we ESPecially love Farve Network"

Those so called “analysts” spew their bias and are wrong more frequently than they are right.

Let it roll off. Our Bears perform well as the “underdog”. Just let the rest of the league “buy in” to the nonsense that the Bears have no game, continue to underestimate their defensive prowess. Let em have their say, they just look dumb when our guys continue to roll.

If you don't ask, you don't get. So get on with it already.

by Suffering from Chicago Sports on Nov 25, 2010 9:07 AM CST up reply actions  

lol it was nfl network

its espn
its everywhere
we get no respect
every time we win its because the OTHER team didnt play well
well the same teams we beat the jets beat, how come we dont get mentioned
ive heard more about vick vick vick than i have about anything else
once we beat the eagles i get to sit through another week of the eagles beat themselves, the bears got lucky…
tonight when the jets barerly beat the bengals we get to hear how great of a team they are.

Woooo
hoooooooo! BEARS WAVE!!:"ø¤º°¨ ¨°º¤ LETS GO !¤¤º°¨BEARS
¨°º¤øº¤ø"¸¸ø¤º°¨"ø¤º°¨ ¨°ºL-E-T-S GO!"ø¤º°¨
¨°º¤BEARS!¸"ø¤º°¨¨°º¤øºL-E-T-S
GO!¤¤º°¨ ¨°º¤øº¤ø"¸¸ø¤º°¨BEARS WAVE:"ø¤º°¨¨°º¤KEEP THE WAVE GOING
...¸"ø¤º°¨ ¨°º¤øº LETS GO BEARS!¤¤º BEARS WAVE!!:"ø¤º°¨ ¨°º¤KEEP THE WAVE
GOING ¸"ø¤º°¨ ¨°º¤øº LETS GO BEARS!¤¤º°¨¨°º¤øº¤......ø"¸ if your not a
BEARS fan.... KICK ROCKS!!!! ♥

by Tommy Ohyeah Mcduffie on Nov 25, 2010 9:18 AM CST up reply actions  

More douchefest

href=“http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/blog/shutdown_corner/post/The-absurdly-premature-2010-playoff-picture-Wee;_ylt=AmumiP5Ar2RnLu8Vrz1OLDhDubYF?urn=nfl-289002” >

If you don't ask, you don't get. So get on with it already.

by Suffering from Chicago Sports on Nov 25, 2010 9:19 AM CST up reply actions  

Link fail

If you don't ask, you don't get. So get on with it already.

by Suffering from Chicago Sports on Nov 25, 2010 9:19 AM CST up reply actions  

This is the craftiest one yet.

http://www.miamiherald.com/2010/11/25/1943106/line-of-scrimmage-judgement-week.html

The Chicago Bears and Tampa Bay Buccaneers have been the NFL’s equivalent of the socially-challenged child on the school playground this season. They’re awkward, devoid of charisma and no matter how much you ignore them, they just won’t seem to go away.

"Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win."

by GriggsBriggs on Nov 25, 2010 10:42 PM CST up reply actions  

as i posted a couple of times earlier in the week i don't think the Bears should spy Vick

whether they will do so full time or part time – we shall see
but as wilt said, to devote a spy to cover Vick would detract from the overall defense.
i said earlier in the week that to spy Vick would be exactly what the Eagles want and would play into their hands.
playing disciplined defense will contain him but i do disagree about the big hit.
i think you want to punish Vick big time. you want to put him on his back hard, even if it costs a roughing the passer penalty once or twice during the game.
you want to put some fear into him if you can.
sure, make the tackle – obviously, but beat him down.
lastly –
GO BEARS!

"I am a sinner who does not expect forgiveness. But I am not a government official." - Francis Wolcott

by Maelvampyre on Nov 25, 2010 9:16 AM CST reply actions  

Another thing would be to get a pick early...kill his confidence

I don’t think that it will affect him too much, but throwing his first pick of the season will no doubt work in da Bears’ favor
And I think this has been hit on a few times: SAFETIES MUST STAY DEEP!
Just because Vick is scrambling or its 3rd-1 doesnt mean they can cheat the covg…Jackson especially, and Maclin to a lesser extent, will beat almost any safety in a footrace with Vick’s arm, thats all he’ll need to do. I hope Danieal Manning is up to the task.

by BOBdaBEAR on Nov 25, 2010 10:04 AM CST reply actions  

Another thing...

Fox has dubbed Bears-Eagles:
AMERICA"S GAME OF THE WEEK

by BOBdaBEAR on Nov 25, 2010 10:06 AM CST reply actions  

Here's a thought

This is just me spitballing—maybe they could STD tests along the line of scrimmage—I understand he has trouble avoiding those.

If I did what I love for a living, what would I do in my free time?

Writer at windycitygridiron.com {-/-} http://www.twitter.com/kdoggers

by Kev H on Nov 25, 2010 10:08 AM CST reply actions  

put

Sure, I have the ability to delete my comment and rewrite, but I won’t. So deal with that.

If I did what I love for a living, what would I do in my free time?

Writer at windycitygridiron.com {-/-} http://www.twitter.com/kdoggers

by Kev H on Nov 25, 2010 10:09 AM CST up reply actions  

just wrong...

funny, but wrong

If you go in the bathroom, turn off the lights, and say "Da Coach" 5 times while facing the mirror... Ditka will appear and slap the wussy right out of you.

by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Nov 25, 2010 11:59 AM CST up reply actions  

Should be about 45 degrees outside at best on Sunday.

I can only hope they let the pee wee league and fifteen marching bands play on the field on Saturday like they normally do so the field is all torn up as per the course. It sounds terrible, but in my opinion their WR are nothing but speed, and their TE has been terrible catching the ball this year.

Cold weather + Jacked up field = Bears Win.

If not? We’ll still be able to pull it out, but it’d be nice to have the auto-win.

Associate Writer - WindyCityGridiron.com - Artist formerly known as Sklz711

by Jacob Hayes on Nov 25, 2010 11:13 AM CST reply actions  

I think we can get a pretty good idea of how the Bears plan to defend Vick

By looking at how they did it the last time he was in Chicago. True he was with the Falcons but the basics should be pretty much the same although he is a much better passer this year. I see the Bears forcing Vick to throw his 1st interception(s) and create a few turnovers and win the game by at least 10 points. Im looking for Cutler to have a big game and beat Asante at least once on a double move because he is definitely prone to go for it trying to get a pick…We will quiet our critics with a solid win against a playoff team and march on towards the playoffs

When did Phil start playing rookies? With age brings wisdom lol

by EmmCeee on Nov 25, 2010 11:53 AM CST reply actions  

I'd be happy if Cutler

stayed away from Samuel most of the game

If you go in the bathroom, turn off the lights, and say "Da Coach" 5 times while facing the mirror... Ditka will appear and slap the wussy right out of you.

by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Nov 25, 2010 11:58 AM CST up reply actions  

Samuel is overrated.

There. I said it.

He’s great at gambling for position, but, as Nique says, you throw him off his routine… which is prematurely jump routes (which, because of his speed, he normally doesn’t get burned on too badly) and cause him to miss tackles.

He’s a poor tackler, a good zone corner, bad man cover. Gives up some easy tackles to try to make a play on the ball. Interceptions, while worrysome, are his only trick… people think he’s more fearsome than he really is.

Five foot three seems to thrive on his misery...

by awfullyquiet on Nov 25, 2010 2:15 PM CST up reply actions  

Not to mention he may not even play .

" Everyone has a plan 'till they get punched in the mouth. " ~
Mike Tyson

by MidWayMonster54 on Nov 25, 2010 9:08 PM CST up reply actions  

I never wish bad things on players...

but that’s not to say that I won’t breathe a sigh of relief if Samuels isn’t on the field.

in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.

by Timothy Hockemeyer on Nov 25, 2010 10:12 PM CST up reply actions  

People say the same thing about DeAngelo Hall.....

How did that turn out, again? I’d rather Cutler be safe than sorry. The Bears will not get away with the kind of mistakes made against the Redskins with the Eagles.

That being said, Samuel is playing the best football of his career, and not just ballhawking. I’ve spent a lot of time this week watching the Eagles and after seeing more than st the highlights of Samuels play, I actually think he is under-rated at this point. He is playing incredibly well and extremely smart, and his communication with his safeties almost borders on ESP.

If the Bears underestimate Asante, it will be a long night for Our Beloved Bears.

in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.

by Timothy Hockemeyer on Nov 25, 2010 10:12 PM CST up reply actions  

Bears will win

Bears-71905455230625
Eagles- negative 903476

by DaHamsta on Nov 25, 2010 2:36 PM CST reply actions  

Also, "accidentally" let the sprinklers run over the weekend.

"You teach me baseball and I'll teach you relativity...No, we must not. You will learn about relativity faster than I learn baseball." - Albert Einstein

by Shawn Domagal-Goldman on Nov 25, 2010 8:49 PM CST reply actions   1 recs

+1

We need to slow Vick down, we can’t stop him – agreed. Lovie has already said he’s not going to put a spy on Vick, and the Cover 2 is a containment scheme perfectly adapted to how they attack people. The field should be pretty cut up from the previous engagement this week (some high schoolers?), so it’s not like we’re getting the quick Vick on astro -turf, ditto Desean Jackson. It’s not their offense we should be worried about – it’s our offense. We could have scored a solitary field goal or a safety against the Dolphins and still beat them. That won’t happen against the Eagles. They have two good backs in McCoy and Harrison, and a bunch of handy receivers that can light us up – particularly if they go at Chris Harris. Is Briggsy okay? If he is then we’re back to being the healthiest team in the league, and with our ST let’s hope it’s enough. Losing to the Eagles would be disastrous in terms of wild cards, compared to other teams with similar records we’ve lost more conference games.

by Wally&Mac on Nov 26, 2010 1:00 AM CST up reply actions  

Find U2

We need a concert, pronto

by JoCro on Nov 26, 2010 3:43 PM CST up reply actions  

great job on the write up

 judging by the smack talk of the eagle fans they would have us believing we are going up against a super bowl mvp. A payton manning if you will. Now it could roll there way, but its not going to go down with vick looking like he did against the skins. i just dont see him playing a perfect game like he did. especially with peppers chasing him in the back field.

vick will get some numbers but the bears will get the win

Bill Swerski: Alright, alright! Now, let me shift gears here for a moment. What is God's role in this? Obviously, he's rooting for Da Bears.

by LightsOutVegas on Nov 25, 2010 10:12 PM CST reply actions  

We finally agree!!!!!

Bob Sanders and Ron Turner should have shared that MVP award. He got it cause they “owed” it to him. Period.

in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.

by Timothy Hockemeyer on Nov 26, 2010 3:17 AM CST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Windy City Gridiron is the best independent site on the internet for breaking news, in-depth analysis, and hardcore discussion about the Chicago Bears

Community Guidelines

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Images_small
*A Modest Proposal

Recent FanPosts

029_small
Solving a Crisis: Redzone Edition
Images-8_small
Why the Offensive Line will be fine.
Windycityflyer_small
SMD's Bottom 5
Images-8_small
Yahoo Fantasy Football Update
Small
We may not know DT Nate Collins but the Chicago Bears do.
029_small
Is it time for a contract? Oh no, not another Matt Forte post...
Burlacher2_small
Is Winning Games a Specialty?
Burlacher2_small
Apparently, Defense Wins Championships...
Fox_small
Bad start for AJ Jenkins
Burlacher2_small
What's It Take to Win?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Windycity_small Adam T

189886_210123485665309_100000029768895_888721_5830650_n__1__small Dane Noble

Editors

Sackwatchcutler_small Lester A. Wiltfong Jr.

535321_3734130120778_1501804679_3253247_588486681_n_small David Taylor

Orange_shy_guy_small Steven Schweickert

Capture_small Kev H

Contributing Writers

Lincoln_small Sam Householder

Leprechaun_small Spongie

Polishsausage_small Steve Ronkowski

Icothgmts_small T.J. Shouse

Joe_20mantegna-bill_20swerski_small Superfans

P981d5c2_reasonably_small_small DaveGilbertNFL