NFC Power Rankings: Do you really care?
Power rankings get a lot of publicity and in some instances they cause a lot of anger. Fans get so riled up if they perceive their team getting slighted in any way. Hearing something like this is common, 'My team beat this team so my team should be ranked higher.' And I especially love when this logic comes up, 'We beat those guys that lost to these guys, so why are we ranked lower?'
Power Rankings are put together for one reason. To get people talking. It's great for our message boards when someone has the Bears ranked low. We'll get the 'How dare they!' type comments as much as the 'see, the Bears are a bad football team' chatter.
I honestly can say I don't even bother checking power rankings. It's meaningless. I will however, find out where the Bears are ranked as soon as I stumble on a WCG thread that mentions it. I really don't care if one publication has a team with a worse record ranked higher than another team, because the person or persons ranking the teams do so very subjectively. Any knucklehead can slap together a Power Ranking, just as sure as some goofball could be throwing darts at a dartboard to rank their teams. No one knows. Sure, head to head match ups can be a great way to decide things, but in the NFL teams win or lose when they shouldn't. You know the old saying, 'on any given Sunday.'
Teams do peak at different times during the season and some have injury issues they need to work through. You could strictly go by the stats. Team A is ranked higher than Team B in total offense and defense so Team A must be better. But then the point of making a Power Ranking is moot, because the stats would simply tell all.
Just because the Bears beat the Packers in week 3, does that automatically mean the Bears are a better team? If so would that make the Seahawks better than the Bears? How about the Redskins? It seems to me that if someone were to get their underpants in a bunch because the Bears are ranked lower that a team they beat, then that argument should hold true with every team on their schedule, and that's just not feasible.
So now, after I told you how ridiculous I find power rankings, it makes perfect sense to throw one up myself. Why not? I'm as much a knucklehead as any other expert. I'll limit my rankings to only the NFC, because come playoff time that's all that matters to the Chicago Bears. For an outstanding look at the NFC teams fighting it out, take a look at this piece (link will pop) done by Kev.
1) Atlanta Falcons (10-2) - I wasn't sold on the Falcons until the last couple weeks. Beating the Packers two weeks ago was huge. Taking down the Buccaneers last week was a nice win as well. They may be peaking at the right time.
2) New Orleans Saints (9-3) - The NFL is a passing league, and the Saints have the best passing attack in the NFC. Factor in their running game which is coming around, and they have an explosive offense. Their D ain't too shabby either.
3) Green Bay Packers (8-4) - The second best passing attack in the NFC resides in Green Bay, they just have so many weapons. But it's their defense that makes me nervous as a Bears fan. They are a deep team that keeps plugging players in and finding ways to win.
4) Chicago Bears (9-3) - Do I think the Bears can beat the three teams up there, yes, but all three of those teams are better in one critical area, their offensive lines. I'm still seeing too many mental breakdowns from the Bears up front.
5) Philadelphia Eagles (8-4) - The Eagles have the talent to play with anyone, and their offense is scary good, #1 in yards and #2 in scoring.
6) New York Giants (8-4) - The Giants embarrassed the Bears in that nationally televised game way back when, but that was before the Bears realized what they were offensively. The Giants offensively come at you with a one two punch on the ground that may be the best tandem in the NFC.
7) Tampa Bay Buccaneers (7-5) - The Bucs are a good young team, playing some good football. This team will grow into a legit contender in a couple years.
These seven teams are all playing good enough to make the playoffs, but two of them won't. Either the Rams or Seahawks will eke out the NFC West claiming the 4 seed. I think the top six are all legit contenders to win the NFC, but one of them will be left out of the tourney.
61 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Wait, we beat the Packers, and have a better record than them,
and they have all those injuries… and they’re still ranked higher than us?!?!

by Dane Noble on Dec 7, 2010 11:07 AM CST reply actions 5 recs
Hey where did you find that picture of Manumaleuna (sp)
by BEARSFAN19 on Dec 7, 2010 11:18 AM CST up reply actions 4 recs
Double Recs
And I will now call Manumaleuna the manatee.
by DaHamsta on Dec 7, 2010 3:26 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Unless your team has Brady or Favre
and then apparently it is easy.
Being Who You Thought We Were Since 2005!
Ditka is the best
All women are beautiful when the lights are off!
by touchdown bears on Dec 7, 2010 11:14 AM CST reply actions 5 recs
The tiebreakers are going to be giant down the stretch.
Eagles are effectively two back of the Bears, which means a split with the Cowboys and a loss to the Giants gets them to 10 wins max and puts the Bears one win away from having an edge over them.
The Bucs are a real 2 games back. Conference record is the first tie breaker and if both teams get to 10 wins, then the conference tie breaker is used and the Bears must have one win be over the Vikings or the Packers.
The Giants are tough because of the loss to them putting us effectively up only a half game.
The Saints are ahead in terms of conference record currently so the Bears must win vs. the Vikings and Packers. if the Bears only go 2-2 down the stretch, the wins must be the Vikings and Packers.
I’ll limit my rankings to only the NFC, because come playoff time that’s all that matters to the Chicago Bears.
Because they won’t make it to the Super Bowl?
Hi-hoooooo!
C’mon man, you left that door not only wide open, but with sign posts guiding me to it for the past three miles.
The Minnesota Vikings: Where we're so desperate to win a Super Bowl, we'll even sign washed-up Packers.
And then I go and botch the block quote.
Go me.
The Minnesota Vikings: Where we're so desperate to win a Super Bowl, we'll even sign washed-up Packers.
by Robert Rence on Dec 7, 2010 12:13 PM CST up reply actions
ha!
good try… but I get the gist of your comment
If you go in the bathroom, turn off the lights, and say "Da Coach" 5 times while facing the mirror... Ditka will appear and slap the wussy right out of you.
by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Dec 7, 2010 12:29 PM CST up reply actions
At least you owned up to it.
And didn’t email me begging to delete it so you didn’t make the whole of Vikings fandom look bad or anything. :)
If I did what I love for a living, what would I do in my free time?
Writer at windycitygridiron.com {-/-} http://www.twitter.com/kdoggers
Not too hard to do....
If you can't laugh at yourself you must not be very funny.
I remain a pessimistically hopeful Bears fan.
...
Please tell me that hasn’t happened before.
The Minnesota Vikings: Where we're so desperate to win a Super Bowl, we'll even sign washed-up Packers.
Ditka!
We will beat everybody and finish 13-3! Dont worry about tie brakers, we will win the division.
by Claudio Oliveira on Dec 7, 2010 11:59 AM CST reply actions
Mostly agree
I mostly agree with these ranking I believe us and the Packers are almost interchangeable. Mostly because they have all those injuries. I believe that the Bears need to go 2-2 to make the playoffs. The Patriots will be tough to beat, but at least they will have a short week and we will be at home. Vikings are very beatable, but if they keep T-Jack in they may be a problem. Then there’s the Jets, which I’m not too worried about. We just started the quick passing game and this offense is starting to look a lot like the Pats without a decent O-line. This game can be very winnable. Then the Packers on the road, where I believe will be a tough game especially on the road. If we go 3-1 during the stretch there may be a bye week!
by Captain Kangaroo on Dec 7, 2010 12:03 PM CST reply actions
Yay!!! Useless rankings that don't matter to anyone!!!
Useless as tits on a bull……..
There's no substitute for guts.
-Paul Bear Bryant
by I love football! on Dec 7, 2010 12:20 PM CST reply actions 1 recs
We've got a very tough road ahead of us.
Pats… I don’t need to say anything
Vikes… Leslie Frazier has them playing better, and if Favre is out, they are automatically better.
Jets… they got whooped last night, but their 46 will present huge problems for the Bears O-line, which has had all kinds of problems picking up blitzes.
Packers… no explanation needed.
"You win because of the quarterback. We have to get that position stabilized. We're fixated on that." -- Jerry Angelo (12.30.2008)
Jerry Angelo trades for Jay Cutler! (4.2.2009)
Oh gees
I think we need to win 2 of the last 4 and we’re in. So of that list, pick 2.
New England- wow. And I thought I was nervous before the Eagles game… Tom Brady and that offense are playing confident as I’ve ever seen. 5 wide from their own 6? Are you kidding me?
Vikes- new coach, reinvigorated team, a change at QB. [gulp]
The Jets-I think we can and will beat the Jets.
The Packers- holy freaking mackeral. If we’re both 9-6 at this point playing for the division, can you say EPIC?
I don’t think I’m ready for us not making the post season. I have so much hope for this Bears team.
I can’t wait for Sunday.
5 wide from their own 6
They initially lined up with Welker in the backfield on the shotgun, and then he shifted out to the left slot, they had the tight end on the edge of the line. The tight end Hernandez is lined up on the right end of the offensive line
The Jets rush 5 guys, and the tight end releases from the line completely untouched. Being untouched, the ball is in Brady’s hands for what I’ve unofficially timed to be about 1.8 seconds. He catches the ball about three yards past the line of scrimmage, and has all kinds of time in the middle of the field because the jets defensive backs are focused on the four wide receivers on the field.
First contact on the ball carrier (From Lowery, the Jets 4th CB) comes seven yards past the line of scrimmage, at which point Hernandez drags him well past the first down marker out to about the 21.
Confidence? Not really. They know the Line protects well enough anyways, and the shotgun gives them the extra time. Brady releases the ball almost immediately, and the Vaunted Jets defense doesn’t have a chance.
If I did what I love for a living, what would I do in my free time?
Writer at windycitygridiron.com {-/-} http://www.twitter.com/kdoggers
Nice!
Good analysis.
But yeah, it takes a little bit of confidence to roll Welker out and give an empty backfield. We’re throwing the ball from our 6 yard line- stop us.
Most teams that deep in their own end are going to at least give you a running formation anyway. At least keep a RB in the backfield.
I don’t know if 5 wide from the 6 is confidence, cockiness, or stupidity. All I know is, it scares the crap out of me. Our boys are going to have to bring it because that team is rolling.
The Jets tend to be very blitzy.
The Jets had six DBs on the field, but what’s interesting was the way they were lined up. They sent their linemen and both linebackers at the QB, so it was one on one matches for the whole OL.
They had one safety deep, playing the middle of the field ten-fifteen yards back. The other safety was on the receiver split wide right, playing about six yards off. There was a corner playing about five yards off the inside right receiver, and then another corner who looks to have been responsible for an underneath zone about 6-8 yards off the line of scrimmage.
Problem for for the Jets is, Hernandez got off so clean and quickly that he’s wide open underneath, and he’s too big for the corner to take down, so he gets dragged until the safety is able to make it over to make a hit.
If I did what I love for a living, what would I do in my free time?
Writer at windycitygridiron.com {-/-} http://www.twitter.com/kdoggers
So your saying when the Jets play the Bears
Greg Olsen will carry them to victory…
If you go in the bathroom, turn off the lights, and say "Da Coach" 5 times while facing the mirror... Ditka will appear and slap the wussy right out of you.
by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Dec 7, 2010 4:16 PM CST up reply actions
It's not unrealistic
The Jets had some trouble covering an athletic tight end. And if they’re going to leave the middle of that field as soft as they did on this particular play, Bennett, Hester, and Olsen could have a field day.
If I did what I love for a living, what would I do in my free time?
Writer at windycitygridiron.com {-/-} http://www.twitter.com/kdoggers
shoot
cutler should just go for some spread qb draw action when it’s 2nd and goal from the 5.
by reefermadness3 on Dec 7, 2010 5:27 PM CST up reply actions
They blitz 50% of the time which is not good news for Frank OMG and Webb ...
Brady adjusts, Cutler doesn’t/can’t.
Cutler has been making his sight reads the last few weeks
much better than he has early in the season…
Those quick hitters he throws are all blitz busters.
If you go in the bathroom, turn off the lights, and say "Da Coach" 5 times while facing the mirror... Ditka will appear and slap the wussy right out of you.
by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Dec 8, 2010 9:52 AM CST up reply actions
It is confidence....
Tom Brady is a machine, no more likely to throw an INT in the redzone or on his 1 yrd. line. He has 385 pass attempts so far this year and only 4 INT’s. He, his receivers and RB’s have a total of 5 fumbles and 4 lost. Meaning, they are just as likely to turn the ball over with someone running with the ball or throwing. Not many teams have a QB like that and that is why we don’t see it very much.
They are the best team in the NFL and unfortunaly, we may be embarrassed this weekend. I am hoping our D shows up more than the Jets’ did but I am just not very confident about our secondary.
by I Have Bearsititis on Dec 7, 2010 4:53 PM CST up reply actions
The only way we get embarassed
is if Rex Cutler shows up instead of Jay Cutler.
That defense is still quite suspect, sir. Mark Sanchez’s abysmal performance aside, these Pats are a team that can still give up a lot of yards.
If I did what I love for a living, what would I do in my free time?
Writer at windycitygridiron.com {-/-} http://www.twitter.com/kdoggers
No offense but this is stupid.
I don’t see how anyone can put the Bears behind the Packers.
Considering the Bears have a better division (4-0) and overall (9-3) record than the Pack (3-2, 8-4) . Division and Overall records are the only thing that anyone can really go by right now, and the Bears beat the pack in both.
13. It's a magic number
by suckmyditka on Dec 7, 2010 1:11 PM CST reply actions 3 recs
Wrecking this comment, not because I agree with it,
but because you attacked the idea, and not the person who wrote it. Thank you.
Inaccurate numbers....
The Packers are 3-1, not 3-2, in the Division. They are also now 6-3 in the Conference (to the Bears 7-3).
It is a tough situation to judge though.
Ummm right
Lol not innaccurate i knew what i was talking about, typo my friend but thanks for catching it
13. It's a magic number
I think the Packers are a better team than the Bears at this time.
That could change in a week.
The Packers have also scored more and given up fewer points. They also have more yards per game, more passing yards per game, and 23rd to Chicago’s 22nd in rushing yards.
And while the Bears have a statistically better defense in yards given up overall, the Packers are better vs. the pass in yards allowed and their 35 sacks are better than the Bears 25 sacks. The Pack also have a +8 turnover margin to the Bears +3
If you go in the bathroom, turn off the lights, and say "Da Coach" 5 times while facing the mirror... Ditka will appear and slap the wussy right out of you.
by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Dec 7, 2010 2:09 PM CST up reply actions
But they are still the Packers.
We must therefore not like them.
They have ugly uniforms, and bad breath.
If you don't ask, you don't get. So get on with it already.
by Suffering from Chicago Sports on Dec 7, 2010 2:16 PM CST up reply actions
And stupid faces
Why doesn’t anyone include that in their power rankings?
by NorthSideBearsFan on Dec 7, 2010 2:28 PM CST up reply actions
agreed on the stank breath and ugly unis
but I gotta call it like I see it
If you go in the bathroom, turn off the lights, and say "Da Coach" 5 times while facing the mirror... Ditka will appear and slap the wussy right out of you.
by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Dec 7, 2010 2:28 PM CST up reply actions
There you go again, letting logic get in the way
You and your damn statistical analysis

If you don't ask, you don't get. So get on with it already.
by Suffering from Chicago Sports on Dec 7, 2010 2:41 PM CST up reply actions
Stats are stats but the Pack really can't run the ball
They can’t run that ball and if the 49ers had a QB that could hit the broadside of a barn, they lose Sunday. I think the Pack are good but I don’t get why their victories are somehow more of an indication of success than the Bears. We beat Dallas, Detroit, and the Vikings we’re lucky. They beat a Romoless Dallas team, a Vikings team in disarray and the Lions and they’re “gelling” and getting “hot”. We’ll see how it plays out but the Bears be them and for that stat alone the Bears are better.
Yeah but it worked!
i agree
i think the packers are better overall than the bears.
but, you only have to be better on the right day.
well said
If you go in the bathroom, turn off the lights, and say "Da Coach" 5 times while facing the mirror... Ditka will appear and slap the wussy right out of you.
by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Dec 7, 2010 4:12 PM CST up reply actions
To answer your underlying question, uh, no.
Bears can win 3 of the next 4. They are in fact better statistically than the Pack, as so astutely pointed out by Ditka begging to be sucked. Further, the Bears have Pepper, Cutler, Urlacher, Knox, Bennett, Briggs, Kruetz and a cast of thousands.
We outclass them (Packers and their fans) in so many ways.
Heresy, my fine sir. Never go against the family again, never.
If you don't ask, you don't get. So get on with it already.
by Suffering from Chicago Sports on Dec 7, 2010 1:49 PM CST reply actions
I'm hoping for the Giants to collapse
as that seems to be the only way to get a wild card spot if the Bears and GB end up with the same record. But I guess it won’t matter too much if the Giants beat the Pack and we just keep rollin’.
by NorthSideBearsFan on Dec 7, 2010 2:35 PM CST reply actions
It's utterly ridiculous that 2 of these teams will miss the playoffs to make room for a mediocre team from the West
Well, isn't what LeBron did last night the living embodiment of The Secret, leaving millions on the table and turning himself into a hometown villain, all for the sake of winning?
Neil Paine, basketball-reference.com
by snley on Dec 7, 2010 3:18 PM CST reply actions 1 recs
it is what it is
This year the NFC West is down… but you never know what happens come playoff time, just ask the 9-7 2008 Cardinals that went to the SB
If you go in the bathroom, turn off the lights, and say "Da Coach" 5 times while facing the mirror... Ditka will appear and slap the wussy right out of you.
by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Dec 7, 2010 4:15 PM CST up reply actions
The Bears will be second.
The Packers will be first.
If I did what I love for a living, what would I do in my free time?
Writer at windycitygridiron.com {-/-} http://www.twitter.com/kdoggers
The Bears will be third. The Packers will be second.
And Brett Favre will be first.
If you can't laugh at yourself you must not be very funny.
I remain a pessimistically hopeful Bears fan.
From one Homer to another...
We’re going to be 15-4.
Mr. H is being silly,
Just Dave is being ridiculous.
Our fearless leader…he made the right call: Ditka (even though it’s up thread!).
Chicago Bears, Bear Down!
Jake is right, we did have a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
by Chauncey Baker on Dec 7, 2010 8:47 PM CST up reply actions
Just doing my job....
If you can't laugh at yourself you must not be very funny.
I remain a pessimistically hopeful Bears fan.
If we hadn't won one game yet
you still put us over the Packers
Superman wears an Urlacher Jersey under his costume
Where are the Patriots?
I’m laughing at #3. C’mon … the Packers? 13 players on IR not enough for you ? They haven’t even got a team. We’ve already beaten them when we were in loser mode. Rodgers is solid, no doubt, but how can they be higher than the Bears with no run game and a quarter of their players on IR?
since you missed my reasoning...
I think the Packers are a better team than the Bears at this time.
That could change in a week.
The Packers have also scored more and given up fewer points. They also have more yards per game, more passing yards per game, and 23rd to Chicago’s 22nd in rushing yards.
And while the Bears have a statistically better defense in yards given up overall, the Packers are better vs. the pass in yards allowed and their 35 sacks are better than the Bears 25 sacks. The Pack also have a +8 turnover margin to the Bears +3
If you go in the bathroom, turn off the lights, and say "Da Coach" 5 times while facing the mirror... Ditka will appear and slap the wussy right out of you.
by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Dec 8, 2010 9:54 AM CST up reply actions
"We’ve already beaten them when we were in loser mode."
Lol! Nice
Yeah but it worked!

by 





















