Mike Martz and Greg Olsen will be OK
This is such an overblown topic. I feel like I'm just adding fuel to the fire by writing this, but I think there's been enough of a calm, where now is actually a good time to get this out there. Yes, I know some of this has been touched on before, by myself in posts and the threads, by other WCG writers, and of course all over the fanposts, but I really think Greg Olsen should be able to thrive in the Mike Martz offense. OK, now take a deep breath and continue reading...
Before you automatically jump to the conclusion that it's due to the play-calling that past tight ends in the Martz offense have had below average seasons, you need to understand that past tight ends in the Martz offense have been below average receivers. Save for the last TE he worked with, Vernon Davis in San Francisco (and he had his own issues he had to deal with, or should I say that Coach Singletary had to deal with), but none of the other guys had the skills of Olsen.
I find two things very odd in this Martz/Olsen situation. First, Martz is always knocked as being a coach that fails to utilize his tight ends, but when he played Martz was a tight end. You' d think he'd have a good idea on how to get the TE involved in the offense.
And secondly, the very same local radio station that first put the Martz playbook out there for all to see, WSCR 670am, (here it is for those of you that haven't seen it) is the same one that really jumped on the "Martz and Olsen can't coexist" story-line. It's odd because had they actually read the playbook, they would have noticed the TE isn't a glorified extra tackle, but he's in the pattern on most every pass play. He might not be the primary receiver, he might not even be the second option, but he's there. And with the philosophy Martz has of stretching the field, he's a viable option. Take into account the speed burners at WR the Bears have, and you can see how some of the underneath or flat routes the TE will run will be there all day... As long as Jay Cutler has time that is.
The Mike Martz offense is derived from the legendary Sid Gillman vertical passing attack and the Don Coryell San Diego Charger offense (Air Coryell). Martz isn't the only offensive mind using some variation of the offense. The West Coast Offense is sprung from the Don Coryell stuff. In fact, most NFL experts consider Coryell the father of the modern passing game.
Current Charger head coach Norv Turner uses a very similar offensive approach as Martz. They both come from the Gillman/Coryell train of thinking. And I think the TE has been OK working with Norv. Just ask Antonio Gates in S.D. and remember Jay Novacek in Dallas? Both skilled receiving tight ends that thrived in the system.
Going even further back, Kellen Winslow (the dad, not Jr.) is a Hall Of Fame tight end after playing in the Air Coryell system. Oakland's Dave Kasper is another Hall Of Fame TE that did OK playing in this offense. Now before you get your Bears underoos in a bunch, I'm not saying Olsen will be a Hall Of Famer. I'm just pointing out a couple other TE's that had success in the system.
We'll never know if those Mike Martz Greatest Show On Turf teams had players like Tony Gonzalez or Shannon Sharpe at TE instead of Roland Williams and Ernie Conwell, maybe things would have been different. Mike Martz can only work with the talent he has. And in 2010 he'll have a good receiving TE. Unless he's traded that is...
256 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
What!
you mean we aren’t trrading him for a second round pick OMG!!! we should totally do that, and then draft all WR, til we have a legit number 1! that will solve all our problems.
Chuck Norris once met Dick Butkus and had a very odd feeling come over him. Chuck later realized it was fear
by BearNecessities on Apr 6, 2010 11:24 AM CDT reply actions
I think the fundamental issue
which you did not address in your post is that we just paid $6M to a blocking TE who is going to see more snaps than Olsen. Martz is NOT going to run two TE sets. Olsen will get some plays and he is generally solid in the red zone but he is not the blocker that Brandon M is.
So, unless Olsen improves significantly as a blocker, he’ll be the second string TE or at best he’ll be a tall receiver/h back who can’t get yards after the catch or fight for jump balls.
If you can get a second round pick for Olsen right now you take it and don’t look back— and no, you don’t need to draft a WR but you should definitely look at a starter on the O line or secondary help.
by The Kaiser on Apr 6, 2010 11:35 AM CDT reply actions 1 recs
H-Back
Manu is suited to play H-Back. That’s why Jason McKie was cut.
"When I played pro football, I never set out to hurt anyone deliberately - unless it was, you know, important, like a league game or something." ~ Dick Butkus
by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Apr 6, 2010 11:47 AM CDT up reply actions
yes
Looking at his play book, he has the FB (or H-Back) on the field a bunch with a TE. Manu will see time at TE as well, and I think Olsen will play some in the backfield as an H-Back. He’s done it in the past with Turner calling the shots.
"When I played pro football, I never set out to hurt anyone deliberately - unless it was, you know, important, like a league game or something." ~ Dick Butkus
by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Apr 6, 2010 12:04 PM CDT up reply actions
agreed.....
I see them both spending 60 to 70% of the snaps……
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The act of doing the same thing over and over again while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Apr 6, 2010 12:13 PM CDT up reply actions
Let me understand:
You think that Martz is going to be running two receiver sets 60-70% of the time?
no....
I think that both will see 60-70% of the snaps. That doesn’t mean they will all be together. But the Bears seldom run without at least one TE. So if the Bears us at least one 95% of the time, and both see 60-70%, then they would likely both be on the field together for between 25 and 45% of the snaps, which falls in line with recent history in Chicago, especially if you count the snaps that McKie was in the backfield with one of the TEs on the field.
Sorry that I didn’t make that more clear…..
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The act of doing the same thing over and over again while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Apr 6, 2010 1:02 PM CDT up reply actions
I'll buy that...
And whether it’s closer to 25% or closer to 45% will likely depend on how well our D is playing (and what the scores look like.)
exactly.....
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The act of doing the same thing over and over again while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Apr 6, 2010 1:50 PM CDT up reply actions
Olsen will be on the field with Manumaleuna
it is not an either/or situation
I always turn to the sports section first. The sports page records people's accomplishments; the front page has nothing but man's failures.
~Earl Warren
by lookingdeadred on Apr 6, 2010 2:03 PM CDT up reply actions
And he eats puppies.....
Prove it.
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The act of doing the same thing over and over again while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Apr 6, 2010 11:37 AM CDT up reply actions
Prove it...
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The act of doing the same thing over and over again while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Apr 6, 2010 12:05 PM CDT up reply actions
My perception is the same..
I may be wrong but it seems to be that Olsen goes down too easily.
My evidence is my unbiased perception of a Bears fan who has watched every one of his games since he entered the league. I like Olsen. I want him to be the best TE in the league. I really do.
But I watched him go down enough times to know that something isn’t quite right there…
Again, context matters.....
Look at how Olsen gets the ball. Seldom with space, and usually in double coverage. These situations do not leave much room for breaking tackles. And considering the BT numbers for the other Elite TEs in the league, Olsen isn’t exactly last in this case. He’s 16th in the league amonst TEs in broken tackles with 4. The most in the league was Gates with a huge total of……13. He had the same or more than Shiancoe, Shockey, Winslow, Owens, Stevens, Rosario, Coats, Watson and 29 other TEs. only 3 had more than 10 BTs. And in the past 3 years, Olsen has 8 broken tackles to Dez Clark’s 4. Yet I don’t here anyone talking about Clark being soft.
I think this is more a case of perception being formed by opinion, rather than the other way around…..
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The act of doing the same thing over and over again while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Apr 6, 2010 12:33 PM CDT up reply actions
Your argument is based on stats...
Mine is based on what I’ve seen- not on what others have said. I think stats can be manipulated more than what I see with my own eyes. I never said he was the worst at breaking tackles, I said I see him go down too easily.
As for your point on him getting the ball in double coverage, if that were always the case then I wouldn’t have a sense of him going down too easily because I don’t expect him to escape those double teams.
What sticks in my mind is him going down quickly in the hands of much smaller DBs— guys that he should, at the very least, be carrying for a yard or two. Also going down quickly on high tackles which he should be able to bounce off of.
Also, he seems to fall down a lot and often run with poor balance after the catch.
I disagree.....
First, your perception is far more easily manipulated than the stats. It’s simple. Olsen has broken twice as many tackles as Dez Clark in the past 3 years. For whatever reason, you didn’t perceive that, likely because you were paying attention to other aspects. But Olsen did break twice the tackle. There is no opinion in that. That is fact.
Olsen also did receive a large number of double teams. That is also fact. Go back and watch the games, and focus on the defensive schemes instead of the offense when the Bears O is on the field (this tend to be why people perceive things from a very one sided view when they watch their team. They tend to pay attention to their guys, and miss a lot of what the opposing team is doing. It’s why I always watch games twice when I’m going to write about them. That way i can watch what both teams are doing.) Do you have NFL game rewind? Great way to watch old games. But it wasn’t just doubles, but scheme, where Olsen was not getting the ball in space (actually, due to scheme, almost nobody on the team was getting the ball in space. Why they game Ron Turner a second go I’ll never know.)
As far as going down to smaller backs, physics is a bitch. There’s actually a great article about the force NFL DBs impact with in popular science. Google it. I think you’ll find it interesting. But, unless a DB and the TE meet head to head, the DB has the advantage, regardless of size due to momentum and impact. The article states that the average sized NFL DB running at the Average speed would impact with 1600 lbs of pressure. If the two are both intent on colliding, then they cancel each others momentum, and weight has a great affect. But this isn’t usually the case, as the DB wants to hit the receiver, but the receiver is trying to get away from the DB. This turns the receivers own momentum against them.
I do agree with the poor balance issue, but I think that has more to do with concentration on catching and holding onto the ball then actual balance. Where he getting more space to catch, this problem would likely remedy itself, and I think Martz will do a much better job of getting the receivers the ball in space.
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The act of doing the same thing over and over again while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Apr 6, 2010 1:17 PM CDT up reply actions
great point man
Good point about balance issues on coming down from catches, but like you said, this is something coachable.
I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.
Anyway...
I don’t think either of us is going to budge from our positions at this point in April.
But if I see G-Reg next season using a stiff arm here and there to fend off a DB and get an extra few yards before being pushed OB, or carry a guy on his back for a few yards (as I have seen Dez due frequently) or go up against a smaller DB and win a jump ball or get out and lay a real block on someone in a WR screen, then I’ll be the first to point it out and my perception of him will change. At this point the stats are meaningless because I believe that I know what kind of player Olsen has been thus far and I hope he improves a bit when it comes to his YAC and his overall toughness and fight.
Check out the Highlights at NFL.com
for the steelers game to see Olsen carrying DBs after the catch……..
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The act of doing the same thing over and over again while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Apr 6, 2010 1:46 PM CDT up reply actions
He has the ability
that’s for sure, but he isn’t that hardest guy to tackle. Thats shouldn’t matter though. What should matter instead is if he fights off defenders to get to the ball in the first place.
+1
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Apr 6, 2010 8:01 PM CDT up reply actions
You are right, that should matter,
And yet again, last year he consistently showed he could not do that. Maybe has has lots of straight line speed, but no agility. Because it always seems that he cannot adjust to the ball once it has left the qb’s hands. If it isn’t on target, Olsen isn’t getting it.
What games were you watching, lobo?
Because all it takes is a simple trek through the NFL weekly Bear highlights videos to disprove what you just said, bro. He consistently made catches in tight spaces, through double coverage, and with big hits coming. I posted a whole list of videos recently on another thread that shows just that. You’re analysis lacks context to the situations. How about some specific examples?
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Apr 6, 2010 9:00 PM CDT up reply actions
Links.....
And a larger selection here……
phew……that’s a lot of posts to comb through for these links…….didn’t expect it to take that long……..
Happy viewing!
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Apr 7, 2010 12:23 AM CDT up reply actions
I don't see any videos, just other posts.
Unless you want me to go through 110 comments to find the one where someone posted a video link…and then go through another 130 comments on the other thread to find the other link.
Sorry, maybe you were expecting the HTML to anchor me to the spot on the page, but it didn’t.
Was exactly what I expected, sorry.
But the last link you won’t find it hard to find the post. It’s huge……..lot’s of videos. I think it is green, also, though I can’t remember for sure.
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Apr 8, 2010 12:22 AM CDT up reply actions
wasn't green....
Post is 3/4 of the way down the thread, titled facts. one link didn’t work, so it is reposted as a response to the post.
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Apr 8, 2010 9:09 AM CDT up reply actions
I'm wondering....
Do you not grant a certain toughness to a player when he focuses on catching the ball instead of focusing on the impending hit? Because this could be the basis of our disagreement. I don’t think either one of us thinks that Olsen is Mike Ditka, either in toughness, or talent. But I do think we we may define toughness a bit differently.
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Apr 8, 2010 8:07 PM CDT up reply actions
I was just wondering, because I'm starting to think...
that our argument might have more to do with symantics than how differently we actually see the player.
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Apr 8, 2010 8:09 PM CDT up reply actions
So nice.....
debating with an intellectually honest individual. Just wanted to say thanks for a great debate, brother. I’m out. ’Night.
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Apr 8, 2010 8:40 PM CDT up reply actions
But there was a lot there showing that
Our TEs and receivers have some promise for the next season. I so wanna see Knox in Martz offense. Exact same body type as Holt.
I agree.
I see a lot of potential in Knox, but I fear that he might end up the odd man out. He and Hester are so similar, and Hester catches a higher percentage of his targets, and drops a lower percentage. And i think that the weapons DA and Bennett possess are different enough that you want all three types on the field. I don’t think he’ll be completely lost, but I have a feeling that he’s not going to get as many snaps as I would like to see him get.
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Apr 8, 2010 8:12 PM CDT up reply actions
wow
So you’re disregarding facts simply because you “perceive” him to be soft? That’s not a strong basis for a defense…I dont think he’s soft. He may not be a good blocker but that in itself doesnt make him soft it just makes him a below average blocker imo..I dont think Forte broke that many tackles last year either which would make him soft also, right? You’re entitled to your opinion but facts are facts and cant be disputed
L.A.----Where playing Like the Sparks is tolerated by a Hall of Fame coach.....
exactly....
“soft” and finesse player are not the same thing. Also, a player who concentrates on making the catch when he hears the footsteps will be easier to tackle. Olsen is the kinda guy who concentrates on the catch rather than the yards. He has made a lot of fighting catches that might have hit the dirt were he more concerned with the defender, the hit, or the extra yards. Considering how many targets he got, he had very few drops. In fact, he’s had only 6 over the past three years, which is less than half of what Vernon Davis dropped just this year, and equal or less than the number of drops in just this last year from Fred Davis, Brent Celek, Dallas Clark, Visanthe Shiancoe, Antonio Gates, Daniel Coats, Randy McMichael, Martellus Bennett, Donald Lee, Brandon Pettigrew and Jason Witten. In other words, this soft TE holds onto the ball even when he knows the hit’s coming.
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The act of doing the same thing over and over again while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Apr 6, 2010 7:16 PM CDT up reply actions
dude when i played HS ball
i ALWAYS hated goin up against the DB’s in hitting drills. I was a runningback/linebacker and when we would do hitting drills i would run to my oline buddies to be their partner.
Those little 5’8 150 pound DBs hit like mac trunks boy.
I would go up against a big guy in hitting drills over a small guy any day
Do or do not there is not try-Master Yoda
Still can't block
Good point about breaking tackles. I think he gets a bad rap because of some of the big hits he gets, but whether you consider Olsen soft or not, he has demonstrated that he can block.
Partly true
But what you’ve seen doesn’t reflect the whole story, the same can be said for a players stats, the best way is to combine film and stats.
If a player never went down, there would be a lot more TD, and not everyone can be a Brandon Marshall and have people just bounce off. Yards after the catch are important, but if he has a high catch percentage, and plays well, I can forgive a weakness.
Also many of use take hits for granted, the average football hit and tackle is about 1600 pounds of force, like getting hit by a car. When hit, most players feel 30-60 g’s, compare that to the 9 g’s of a fighter jet roll. Taking a hit isn’t easy, so I can forgive Olsen for just going down.
Here’s the link to the data: http://www.popularmechanics.com/outdoors/sports/4212171.html
I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.
that's the exact article I was speaking of....
thank you :)
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The act of doing the same thing over and over again while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Apr 6, 2010 5:45 PM CDT up reply actions
Np
It’s not easy to get hit, no matter who you are.
I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.
Dude stop trying to rewrite history with random stats to make the Bears look better.
You are starting to look/sound like Chris Hansen of Britney Spears fame, with such gems as:
“LEAVE GREG OLSEN ALONE!” and “THE BEARS ARE NOT NOR HAVE THEY EVER BEEN CHEAP!”
Is Greg Olsen good at blocking? NO
Is Greg Olsen good at breaking tackles or getting yards after contact? NO
Is there a correlation between his inability to block and his inability to break even the tackles of the smallest DBs ie, he lacks the toughness and strength to block effectively or break even the weakest tackles? YES
Kaiser is really on this. Regardless of your bogus stats I have see Olsen get tacked by 1 lone tiny DB too may times with my own eyes. OLSEN IS SOFT! Sorry cause you clearly wanna join his fan club, but it is true.
Due, stop trying rewrite history by denying applicable stats to make your own soft argument sound better....
Your starting to sound like Chris Carter of Yahoo sports fame, with such gems as:
“The Bears just aren’t good enough to beat the Saints” and “Peyton Manning is not a top 5 QB” (which are actual quotes, not straw man crap like you posted. I never said either of those things. Exaggerate much?)
Was Greg Olsen drafted to be a great blocker? NO
Has Olsen broken more tackles than the respected Dez Clark, as well the majority of TEs in the league? YES
Is your analysis of Olsen’s blocking and tackles breaking, as well as the reason behind it based more on your opinion, which you cannot back up, so you attack the stats, than it is based the facts? YES.
Regardless of your bogus, emotion based opinon, Olsen has broken more tackles than the majority of NFL TEs and has made a lot of touch catches through double coverage. YOUR ARGUMENT IS SOFT! Sorry, cause you clearly wanna keep that hate-on, but it’s true.
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The act of doing the same thing over and over again while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Apr 6, 2010 1:43 PM CDT up reply actions
YOUR ARGUMENT IS SOFT
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The act of doing the same thing over and over again while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Apr 6, 2010 1:46 PM CDT up reply actions
LET'S SCREAM LOUDER AND MAYBE IT WILL BE TRUE
by Steven Schweickert on Apr 6, 2010 2:03 PM CDT up reply actions
lol :D
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The act of doing the same thing over and over again while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Apr 6, 2010 5:46 PM CDT up reply actions
Sweet lord.
Would one of you just write a well written fan-post with a survey, and let people vote.
Is Greg Olsen soft? With a Yes and No would be sufficient.
I'm a firm believer in the philosophy of a ruling class. Especially since I rule. -Randal Graves
Writer at windycitygridiron.com -/-I http://www.twitter.com/kdoggers
YES!!!! Can we just get our heads out off sand!?
Olsen is an average to good player. But this guy is not untradeable! He is to slow to play WR and to soft to be a dominant TE. I would rather see TO running routes in this new offense than Olsen!
Who said he was untradeable?
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The act of doing the same thing over and over again while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Apr 6, 2010 5:08 PM CDT up reply actions
irdk
I think he’s a great target for JC. Very athlecticly gifted, tall and fast. Too bad he cant play both ways and be our fs(joking)
Take it for what it is
Boers and Bernstein’s Bears guy said the best offer they got was a fifth or sixth round draft pick.
i think if that is true
that is a bonafide …ouch.
by reefermadness3 on Apr 7, 2010 1:32 AM CDT up reply actions
Maybe elaborate to four options?
Yes, No, Maybe, Fish.
"F*** everybody outside of Halas Hall. BEARDOWN" - WavyGravy
"44 years of football history and nothing to show for it. I wish I wasn’t banned at the Norseman.." - tfrabotta
Question for ya.
Since screaming doesn’t make your opinion a fact, can you give a SPECIFIC example where you believe Olsen plays soft? T-Train’s given you just about every statistical argument against your case and even refuted your “But it’s a single DB” argument with a science article.
Cause I see a guy who made one hell of a catch against Pittsburgh knowing full well he was going to get drilled, and isn’t that what you want out of your receiving TE, who is bigger than your WRs – a guy that’ll make that tough gritty catch?
All I’ve seen out of you is “deal with it. He’s soft” and “stop rewriting history, he’s soft.” PROVE IT. Geez, this shouldn’t be “How to Have a Debate 101.”
by Steven Schweickert on Apr 6, 2010 2:12 PM CDT up reply actions
greg olson is SOFT
that one play against pittsburgh is is 1 spectacular play. and he was injured but the defender wasn’t. Like I have said I have been watching greg olson play since he was at the U. the guy is soft. He has decent hands, but he certainly isn’t tough or strong. I think he can be productive in martz’ offense, but he is still soft. He is a flopping TE. That is just who he is and as a TE in the NFL he is one of the softest. he is fast and tall and has a good relationship with Cutler, but are yall seriously trying to say olson is tough and strong compared to other TEs let alone the elite TEs? puuhhhlease
You still didn't give a specific example
You reposted the Pittsburgh play as spectacular(your own word), but never gave an example of ‘soft’ play.
Problem is, and I’ve said it before, he’s beginning to believe his own username.
"F*** everybody outside of Halas Hall. BEARDOWN" - WavyGravy
"44 years of football history and nothing to show for it. I wish I wasn’t banned at the Norseman.." - tfrabotta
+1
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The act of doing the same thing over and over again while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Apr 6, 2010 5:10 PM CDT up reply actions
Savor the irony of that for a minute
“no” it all.
If you can't laugh at yourself you must not be very funny.
by Just Dave on Apr 6, 2010 8:29 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
lol
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Apr 6, 2010 9:01 PM CDT up reply actions
ddub said it best.
I’m trying to get you to cite a specific example, which you should have plenty of if you “watched with your own eyes.” If that’s what you have for your evidence, USE IT. TELL US of a specific example where you believe he played extremely soft, soft enough to warrant being labelled a “soft player.”
Never did I use the phrase “tough player.” Olsen is a receiving TE who might prefer use a little more finesse, but I showed an example where he played tough.
Never did I use the phrase “elite TE” either. He definitely hasn’t been one, and that’s one hell of a short list too.
See, YOUR job now should be to disprove the arguments in place. Key word DISPROVE. Not disparage. And “HE IS SOFT” is NOT an argument, it’s random screaming that means jack.
by Steven Schweickert on Apr 6, 2010 5:58 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
Also in the Pitt game.
Wasn’t he goin up to make the first catch and got drill. then got up? I beleive it was in the 1st half. Then goes and does it again in the 2nd half. Plus he did drag a couple of ATL dbs for a couple yards as well. please correct me if im wrong.
you are not wrong.....
That was the game I alluded to above when I suggested highlights, but I suggested the Pitt game by mistake. Thanks for the right game :)
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The act of doing the same thing over and over again while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Apr 6, 2010 5:11 PM CDT up reply actions
They dont see replays of Olsen failing to catch the fade two times in arow in the endzone
He can’t out jump shorter players. In the Pitt game he dropped the ball the first time Clark hit him, but to his credit he caught that second one. I hate that he can’t catch the jump ball in the endzone a majority of the time. He doesn’t do anything great or even very good. He is a middle of the pack TE worth a 5th rd or lower pick. Maybe he will get better. If you show highlight of any player, they look great. I watched him all season and was disappointed. I thought he would have been a lot better. He lost that Carolina game the year before too. Don’t forget those fumbles!
by Ryan21 on Apr 6, 2010 10:07 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions
I don't have those in front of me.
Were those balls even catchable? I noticed more than a fair share of fades that weren’t quite catchable. Scratch that, I remember those two now. But is that cause he’s “soft” or is that because he just couldn’t bring the ball in?
Also, fumbles make highlight reels, but catches with a guy bearing down on him usually don’t. For the plays you mention, Olsen sure can catch the ball while he’s got a guy either about to hit him or hitting him. I’ll take that.
T-Train (I think this was you)‘s covered this whole thing pretty ad nauseum. Who else on the team was deserving of a double, bracket coverage, or any other special treatment? He’s the only receiving player on the team that was a first round pick, he’s the guy they go after in a team of young, unproven receivers. Of course with all the extra attention stuff happens.
Carolina? You’re pinning a loss on a single offensive player? Can you go around saying Aromashodu won that game against Minnesota last year or that Robbie Gould has won every game he hit a clutch FG? If you can point to Olsen, you can also point to any other incident in that game where the Bears left the field without points.
Far as I’m concerned, we’ve seen flashes of what Olsen can do, now we get to sit back and see if Olsen is able to flourish to his full potential under Mike Martz’ system (bringing the topic full circle).
by Steven Schweickert on Apr 7, 2010 7:27 AM CDT up reply actions
What he did in Caroline was the same thing as throwing a game ending pick...
Of course one player doesn’t win or loose a game, but when you make huge mistakes like that, you are a big reason for the loss. The entire offense did their job on those plays and put Olsen in a position to succeed. He failed all by himself, with the help of Chris Harris of couse. I don’t think he is any softer than wideouts or te’s these days. But he should win the jump ball in the endzone almost every time. He almost never does though. That’s my knock on him. We had higher expectations for him. But SNL can make a Lowered Expectations commercial about most of our team though!
by Ryan21 on Apr 7, 2010 8:19 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions
So, because you....
can cite one game that he failed to make the catch, he then usually doesn’t? There’s a whole NFL Films video highlight page than begs to differ. I’m not going into any depth today, as I think I laid out a pretty good argument on this thread already. But I do want to point out that this is the same kind of argument against Olsen that has been dropped on this thread and on all the others. It’s a single situation attack that is then exaggerated into being “typical”. It’s the usual attack something that you cannot quantify, because everything you can quantify hurts the argument………..
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Apr 7, 2010 9:16 AM CDT up reply actions
An NFL highlight film is just that- highlights.
I can take a small sample size of any player’s best moments and make them look great. But you have to take an overall view of his body of work in order to see what he is like consistently.
I agree....
But in the situation where people are talking about what a player doesn’t do, then the videos become relevant.
I’m not arguing that Olsen is a hall of famer. I’m arguing that calling him soft, adn or bad is ludicrous. He’s a finesse player. That doesn’t mean soft, it means finesse.
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Apr 8, 2010 12:24 AM CDT up reply actions
Really
This is getting old, try new words
I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.
It is getting old
Olsen isn’t Mike Ditka, John Mackey, or Mark Bavaro for that matter. He’s a finesse player. He isn’t gonna make the highlight reel for breaking tackles and he will never be a great blocker.
But he’s a good route runner with enough speed to give some LB’s fits and he has enough size to be a tough cover for most DB’s.
He is what he is.
"When I played pro football, I never set out to hurt anyone deliberately - unless it was, you know, important, like a league game or something." ~ Dick Butkus
by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Apr 6, 2010 3:17 PM CDT up reply actions
Agreed
we want him to be hard-nosed, which he isn’t. That doesn’t make him soft, it just makes him a different brand of player
He can give LBs
problems. Problem is he is so one-dimensional that if a team sees him in the game, they put a nickel back on him and he can’t get open. He is easy to game plan against.
DEJESUS!!!
funny, cause....
NFL’s highlight footage has tons of video of him beating safeties and nickels while in double coverage. I’ve posted ton’s before, but if you need direction, see the AZ, ATL and PIT games for starters.
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Apr 6, 2010 9:03 PM CDT up reply actions
Get a new punch line,
You are becoming a bore.
I always turn to the sports section first. The sports page records people's accomplishments; the front page has nothing but man's failures.
~Earl Warren
by lookingdeadred on Apr 6, 2010 3:42 PM CDT up reply actions
LOL!
Not that’s funny right there.
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The act of doing the same thing over and over again while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Apr 6, 2010 1:57 PM CDT up reply actions
He can play
Stop bashing the guy. he performed in a dysfunctual offense. Lets see what he can do this year. I still think he hasnt realized his potential yet. With Smith as hc though, maybe he wont.
by Bob Manganiello on Apr 6, 2010 2:24 PM CDT up reply actions
This is fairly normal when double coverage is involved, as was often the case with Olsen.....
Have posted video repeatedly of this.
and Roy’s video garbage analysis ignores physics completely, so please don’t post some IrishBearsFan garbage roy clips as evidence.
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The act of doing the same thing over and over again while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Apr 6, 2010 12:10 PM CDT up reply actions
Prove it.....
Your’re going to notice a pattern here……
Sick of people making silly comments as if they were fact without any backing reference whatsoever. You’re going to here this a lot from me.
I’ve posted tons of video disproving what you have said. Anecdotes without context are sheer garbage, and thus the "proof you just posted is the same.
Not meaning to attack you, bro. But this kind of silly crap is simply a poor argument. If you’re going to state opinion as fact, expect to be challenged.
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The act of doing the same thing over and over again while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Apr 6, 2010 12:07 PM CDT up reply actions
your argument is soft....
getovait
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The act of doing the same thing over and over again while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Apr 6, 2010 12:10 PM CDT up reply actions
Just because you really want Greg Olsen to be from Kenya
it doesn’t actually make him from Kenya.
(Just to put your fantastical arguments in context [teabaggery])
And just because you want him to be from France....
doesn’t mean he’s from France…..
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The act of doing the same thing over and over again while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Apr 6, 2010 1:44 PM CDT up reply actions
No It All
Honest question—I seem to recall you championing him for a hybrid TE/WR where he could be successful, as say a 3rd receiver. Have you changed opinion on this, or do you still feel that’s the case?
If you think he would be successful there, is being soft ok at that position?
I'm a firm believer in the philosophy of a ruling class. Especially since I rule. -Randal Graves
Writer at windycitygridiron.com -/-I http://www.twitter.com/kdoggers
I think olson can be good under Martz and if used as a hybrid whatever...
I like him sorta, but that doesn’t change my opinion, from ya know watching him play football, that he is soft.
His speed and size are an asset. He was Jay’s number one target last year, which in a lot of ways hurt the offense’s production. Everyone knew Jay was going to Olsen because Jay rightly had no confidence in the other receivers Still the same receiver btw). Lining up as a TE or even at FB would allow Olson to be a 2nd or 3rd check down. I think he can be great in that situation, but not how it was last year with him as our number 1 option in the passing game. In a more nuanced role I think his assets can be exploited and his softness hidden by keeping him in motion. I have a lot of faith in Martz, partially because of the numbskulls that proceeded him, to get the ball to our better players in better situations….
Olson is still soft though and needs to be stronger when he hears footsteps and start dishing out more punishment then he takes.
needs to … start dishing out more punishment then he takes.
I suspect the problem is that he’s not the kind of hard-nosed gravel-chewing player that we expect of the Bears, but I applaud this in the spirit of Walter Payton.
"F*** everybody outside of Halas Hall. BEARDOWN" - WavyGravy
"44 years of football history and nothing to show for it. I wish I wasn’t banned at the Norseman.." - tfrabotta
It's not even that, Spongie.
Besides the one play against Pittsburgh, I’ve never seen Olsen fight for yards. He makes the catch, then starts to fall. He’s not aggressive with the ball. I don’t understand why he can run his route so fast, then when he makes the catch, he all of a sudden looks like he’s in slow motion.
On top of all that, I don’t have much faith in him when it comes to pressure situations. He always seems to drop a pass, or, failing to aggressively go after the ball and get it, looks for the PI call.
T-Train, did you adjust the broken tackles down per play? Its not fair to Dez if you say he has fewer broken tackles if Olsen has more catches.
I’m not saying he’s not good, but he’s definitely not great. And, like No It All said, he looks soft.
Watch the game against Atlanta......
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The act of doing the same thing over and over again while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Apr 6, 2010 7:32 PM CDT up reply actions
And quickly.....
Greg had 133 catches over 3 years with 8 BTs for 6% or 1 BT per 16.6 catches.
Dez had 4 BTs in the same time period spanning over 82 receptions for 4.9% or 1 BT every 20.5 catches.
Never hear anyone talking about how soft Dez is, though.
Another interesting point is that, as often as you hear “soft” and “drops to much”, Greg has dropped all of 6 passes over the past 3 years compared to Dez’s 11 drops. And to address the same question….
Greg dropped 6 passes over 207 targets for a 2.8% drop percentage or 1 drop ever 34.5 targets.
Dez dropped 11 passes over 132 targets for an 8.3% (or almost three times more likely to drop) and 1 drop ever 12 targets.
Never hear about how dez sucks because he drops a lot, or hears the footsteps, either….
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The act of doing the same thing over and over again while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Apr 6, 2010 7:49 PM CDT up reply actions
Great points
Also I would prefer a receiver who catches the ball and goes down to one that can’t catch but will run on the off chance he makes a catch. Having good hands is pretty important.
I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.
My thoughts exactly........
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Apr 6, 2010 8:05 PM CDT up reply actions
And I have a hard time getting "soft" out of.....
being able to hear the train closing in and still focusing on the ball………
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Apr 6, 2010 8:06 PM CDT up reply actions
I'm curious...
Are there any rugged Ditkaesque TE’s in the league that will run through an entire team breaking tackles and dragging defenders?
That is what some are wanting from their TE, but who even fits the bill?
"When I played pro football, I never set out to hurt anyone deliberately - unless it was, you know, important, like a league game or something." ~ Dick Butkus
by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Apr 7, 2010 11:12 AM CDT up reply actions
Shockey

Loses his helmet and continues running, breaking tackles and goes head head first into defenders. Don’t like the guy personally, but that was some serious badass.
-------
"Newbie, if the next two words out of your mouth aren't 'See ya' then the third word will be 'Oh my god. My crotch. You've punched me in my crotch." - Dr. Percival Ulysses Cox
That's 1
and he’s spends a lot of time on the sideline hurt
"When I played pro football, I never set out to hurt anyone deliberately - unless it was, you know, important, like a league game or something." ~ Dick Butkus
by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Apr 7, 2010 2:22 PM CDT up reply actions
I'm not arguing,
I actually agree with you. I’d also throw Witten and Heap in that group too.
-------
"Newbie, if the next two words out of your mouth aren't 'See ya' then the third word will be 'Oh my god. My crotch. You've punched me in my crotch." - Dr. Percival Ulysses Cox
but that play was bad ass!
"When I played pro football, I never set out to hurt anyone deliberately - unless it was, you know, important, like a league game or something." ~ Dick Butkus
by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Apr 7, 2010 2:38 PM CDT up reply actions
yes it was.
It’s surprising that I can’t find video of it.
-------
"Newbie, if the next two words out of your mouth aren't 'See ya' then the third word will be 'Oh my god. My crotch. You've punched me in my crotch." - Dr. Percival Ulysses Cox
Sadly, or I suppose safely
Now, with the new rule changes, when the ball carriers helmet comes off, the play is dead, so no more of that.
I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.
didn't know that...
Witten had a nice one of those as well.
-------
"Newbie, if the next two words out of your mouth aren't 'See ya' then the third word will be 'Oh my god. My crotch. You've punched me in my crotch." - Dr. Percival Ulysses Cox
Yea
With the newest meeting they put that in place, makes sense really, you would think they would have thought of that earlier.
I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.
yet broke same # of Tackles as Olsen....
while dealing with far less double coverage……..perception is a funny thing.
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Apr 7, 2010 4:35 PM CDT up reply actions
I have a feeling, Wiltfong,
that in order to get our points across, each side has become a bit overly dramatic in their examples. I’m sure no Olsen supporter here would objectively claim he’s the best in the league or in the elite (yet, will be their argument). And I’m sure no detractor here will claim he’s a talentless lump either.
But I am claiming he’s soft as a pillow.
His hands are...
But I am claiming he’s soft as a pillow.
If you can't laugh at yourself you must not be very funny.
+1
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Apr 8, 2010 12:18 AM CDT up reply actions
You are creating a false choice.
You don’t have to make the choice between one or the other. You can have both.
Yeah, there's a reason there's five skill position players (RB, TE, WR)
But he’s saying that he’d rather the catch be made, as opposed to gambling on extra yards.
Problem is, lots of times in Olsen’s case, he doesn’t HAVE that room to go for a lot of extra yards, usually he gets so few cause, as T-Train pointed out nicely, there’s already guys on him or about to be on him. He doesn’t have a lot of opportunity to run down the side of the field for YAC or in space. In those cases, you want the guy to at least catch the ball.
by Steven Schweickert on Apr 7, 2010 11:10 AM CDT up reply actions
But he's not double teamed all the time.
You guys make it seem like he’s got half the other team breathing down his neck every snap and he has to make heroic efforts just to catch the ball in the face of certain death.
C’mon, that’s not exactly the truth. And while teams did start to key on him more and more last season as Jay relied on him more and more, he still has a large body of work from before late October of 2009 from which to judge him on.
And even from then, he’s soft.
Never said all the time.
You make it sound like we’re hyperbolizing and proclaiming him the greatest thing since sliced bread. Come on, that’s not exactly the truth. And while it’s true where he might, heaven forbid, not make a catch or be targeted to the point of people being able to make a pick off of overreliance on him, that doesn’t make him a complete bust, and he still has a large body of work from his earlier days at the U.
And even from then, he’s not “soft.”
Breaking from your post style now…
I barely even mentioned him being double teamed in that comment – actually not at all. I said “guys on him or about to be on him.” I didn’t say they were specifically covering him, it’s not like he’s tripled or anything.
He’s NOT a “rock-chewing, gravel-spitting, face-stomping, chain-wielding, truck-driving, construction-working he-man tough guy who wrestles grizzly bears and sharks on off days” tough guy. He’s a large wide receiver who can block passably and who plays with a little more finesse than most like to see out of a tight end. But how many times do you see him bring the ball in as he’s taking contact (a lot)? How many times to you see him just take a play off because he’s soft (I haven’t)?
Seriously, nothing that ANY of you guys is saying points to “soft.” Soft would be slowing down before running into someone, or just standing up and letting a DE run right by him, or just taking a knee before he gets hit. Can you guys use an actual incident of softness instead of “he didn’t win a jump ball” or “everyone can see it”?
by Steven Schweickert on Apr 7, 2010 8:49 PM CDT up reply actions
Just chuckled a little, because
2 of the examples you ask for:
“…slowing down before running into someone…”
“…standing up and letting a DE run right by him…”
are in these clips I found from youtube by another guy who thinks Olsen is soft:
http://bit.ly/bAApwX
http://bit.ly/aN8OPH
http://bit.ly/cqPvd5
Finally. Someone who can read a comment.
Ok, first one, “Your Boy Roy” (gag, pardon) rips on lack of broken tackles. It’s not just size. They aren’t just “Shove the guy to the ground as you’re wrapped up.” The guy’s got him targeted, Olsen’s just turning upfield. DB wins that most times. Your Boy Roy even admits that, the DB’s got momentum cause he’s “lasering him up.” Tight on time, so I didn’t keep watching.
Second… This I will concede, Olsen doesn’t necessarily drop his shoulder and bull into people. But that isn’t necessarily his game; he’s faster than Clark, he would prefer to use his speed. Clark is more of a power TE when he has the ball, but he can’t stretch the field in the way Olsen can. I think this is the crux of the Olsen problem, it’s a different skill set that isn’t what we always think of in a prototypical TE.
Third… What? What I get out of this one is he saw Jay have to unload the ball, thought it was for him and not Dez, then didn’t realize that it wasn’t coming to him and when he realized that he had to block someone it was too late. I don’t think that’s soft, that looks like a mental lapse to me.
Counter evidence.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zwZ9mUJgTLc 2:02 Olsen diving on a fumble. 1:16 long downfield catch knowing he’s gonna get blasted.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rVfdTeOFUVU Bad quality but speaks for itself.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pExQFVBxBwU&feature=related From the Orton years but this works too, going up for the ball and getting taken down for the TD.
And this is why dueling high-and-lowlight packages don’t work for a debate, lol.
by Steven Schweickert on Apr 7, 2010 11:00 PM CDT up reply actions
Also, sorry for the tone.
I didn’t see you had those posted when I made the prior (to this and my main) comment.
by Steven Schweickert on Apr 7, 2010 11:03 PM CDT up reply actions
Your Boy Roy...
might be the absolute worst on the net. Sorry, but he sucks. Of course this isn’t a reflection on you. I’m not trying to attack you, here. But Roy needs to go back to school and learn physics. Guy is an idiot.
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Apr 8, 2010 12:26 AM CDT up reply actions
Don't look Roy's content then. Look at the plays.
Given he’s longwinded, uses the frame by frame too much, has horrible analysis.
But each play is a very clear instance of greg olsen doing exactly the things SJS asked to see.
In one of them, he stops after catching the ball, loses momentum, then fails to hit a guy much smaller than him. Of course I’m not expecting him to shake the tackle and make a TD, but at least fall forward for a yard or two without getting stuck. The dude isn’t Ray Lewis.
On the long pass play it doesn’t matter if he’s faster than Clark, he’s not faster than the safety. And he knows it. Why does he act like a 150 lb pansy? Lower your shoulder and press for the TD!
I apologize for not putting up the vid of Olsen getting handled for not being tough against a DE. Here it is. Put it on mute, whatever, just watch the play. http://bit.ly/9TVkWE
Again, I get tired of Roy’s analysis, but he picks good examples. And since I can’t find the entire games online, I’m gonna continue to use them.
As for SJS’s plays:
Pittsburgh- had a very good game. Of his 3 highlights. First one, good concentration, but Cutler put it right on the numbers, and he barely got touched. Second one across the middle, took a great hit. Good play. Third one. He recovered a fumble. OK, doesn’t really play into this discussion on toughness.
Second video SJS provided: He got hit hard. Then dropped the ball. Dropped it. What’re’ya trying to prove my point for me?
Third video. Hard to see. Looks like he came down with a tough pass.
Clear?
Clear? No. Minor stretches, but not clear.
He didn’t willingly not block the guy in your #3. Looked to me like he whiffed on the play as a whole. Give him a do over, I bet he realizes from square one that that pass isn’t coming to him, and he’s all over that guy.
Your #1, as I pointed out, he’s already being sized up as he’s taking in the ball and turning upfield. The DB wins that most times. I don’t see “stops and falls on face” or “pushed over by stiff breeze.” I see “Turning upfield and DB covers five yards to drill him.”
About the fumble, yeah it does. A player as soft as you want him to be just says “not my problem” and walks away. He dove on it, took a nice rib shot from a couple Steelers.
Response to my #2, he took a nice shot while giving full effort for the play. I’d say a “soft” player would’ve backed off from the play completely.
Third video, yeah. Fan-shot video explains it. Went up for it and got pulled down, made the catch. Looked like a better example last night than it does this morning though.
Look, as a receiver, Clark is more of the power guy than Olsen is. Olsen’s the finesse and speed guy. I hope Olsen learns to turn his shoulder and drive into people too. But for right now that isn’t the player he is, and that’s the problem. He’s not a power back, he’s not a power player.
by Steven Schweickert on Apr 8, 2010 7:25 AM CDT up reply actions
I'll bet I can find a couple plays a year that make.....
Walter Payton look bad, too. I’m not comparing Olsen to Payton, obviously. That would be like comparing stainless steel to platinum. But the point still stands. Using Roy disqualifies the argument.
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Apr 8, 2010 8:55 AM CDT up reply actions
I'm trying to stay out of this...
but you discrediting Roys video footage, because you don’t like the guy is absurd. I don’t like him either and I stay away from getting my football breakdowns from someone that looks like the uni-bomber. However, those plays that he’s “breaking down” are actual plays – that happened – and legitimate opinions can be formed from them. Sadly, you just have to weed through 9.5 minutes of garbage on a 10 minute video to do so.
And as far as your last comment, you will almost always be able to find more highlights than lowlights. There’s hardly any point in showing a video a blocker getting blown up at the line, a QB consistently overthrowing receivers, a TE not going up for jumb balls, etc.
I’m not on any side in this debate, I personally think Olsen is a decent TE, who has the ability to become a great one. I don’t think he’s “soft” but I do think he lacks some fight.
-------
"Newbie, if the next two words out of your mouth aren't 'See ya' then the third word will be 'Oh my god. My crotch. You've punched me in my crotch." - Dr. Percival Ulysses Cox
by David Taylor on Apr 8, 2010 10:52 AM CDT up reply actions
just couldnt stay away
could you
Chuck Norris once met Dick Butkus and had a very odd feeling come over him. Chuck later realized it was fear
by BearNecessities on Apr 8, 2010 11:14 AM CDT up reply actions
I did so good,
for so long. I am so ashamed! :(
-------
"Newbie, if the next two words out of your mouth aren't 'See ya' then the third word will be 'Oh my god. My crotch. You've punched me in my crotch." - Dr. Percival Ulysses Cox
by David Taylor on Apr 8, 2010 11:54 AM CDT up reply actions
SJS and TTrain
Smudgers is right, there is way too little footage out there. I really don’t have the tools to prove my point, and neither do you. I can’t find any more footage of Olsen online.
And we’re not going to solve the issue on 10 plays of total footage.
Also, our definitions of tough and soft differ slightly.
Honestly, I’m spent for now. I guess we’ll have to leave it at that, and find the next great issue to fight over.
Probably....
the best place to leave it. You spelled out your argument intelligently, and so did we. I think that is the best we can hope for. Now, we wait, and see what happens in the future.
Was a nice conversation, Lobo.
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Apr 8, 2010 8:04 PM CDT up reply actions
Yep, good one to have.
Now we have something to watch for next season. Because I’m sure this will come up again. And again. And again.
Look forward to the next time we tangle on the subject.
Good, I like your stats there.
But intangibles like toughness and softness are hard to measure.
When Cutler used to throw jumpballs up to Brandon Marshall and BMarsh would come down with the ball almost every time, it doesn’t say that on the stats. There’s no “jumpballs won” or “CBs owned” stat categories. But that’s a reputation he’s earned. When Olsen rarely catches anything that’s off target, or routinely seems to ignore fighting for extra yardage or a giving a good stiff-arm, he also earns a reputation for being soft. There’s no stat for “missed opportunity to punish defender”. And that’s a reputation that Olsen has earned right now.
And that’s a shame. I see other tight ends around the league fight hard when they get a catch, and I am saddened. Because most of those guys aren’t close to the athlete that Olsen is, but they have an intangible that Olsen doesn’t: toughness.
Does it mean he’s a bad receiver? No. Jay feels most comfortable with him, and what makes Jay comfortable is fine with me. He also runs really nice routes, and looks speedy with his mismatches. But you cannot call him tough. The moment he catches the ball, he acts like a 5’11’’ 180 lb receiver and tries to finesse his way around the field.
I’m sorry I don’t have the time right at the moment to pull up some highlights to illustrate my point. I’ll try to do it later on tonight. Anyone have any good links to look up bears footage? I seem to remember a night game last year where Greg couldn’t seem to catch anything not thrown perfectly at his hands. SF maybe? And there was this awful play (against Philly?) where Cutler threw a 30 yarder to him in the endzone, but he couldn’t catch it because he was turned the wrong way.
that.....
Explains why nobody is calling out Dez for blocking, but it doesn’t explain why people call out Olsen for drops (a horribly wrong perception) or broken tackles.
I just find it funny that perception has become reality almost in spite of actual reality in some of these areas….. I also find it funny how often people remove context from image.
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Apr 6, 2010 8:56 PM CDT up reply actions
I see your point,
but I think he gets called out for drops for 2 reasons.
1. When he does drop a ball, it has been in critical situations, so it stands out more in people’s memories. (And I hope I’ll be able to find a link to back up my memory on this one.)
2. Even though its not really a ‘drop’, people take into consideration Olsen’s lack of effort in going after balls that are slightly off target but still very catch-able. There were a few times during the season that Jay threw to Olsen in desperation in critical game moments, and Olsen didn’t fight to get the ball, or was overpowered by a little contact from whoever was on him. Tight ends are supposed to be able to do those things, otherwise you might as well line-up another WR instead.
I would love to be able to find footage of Olsen’s targets, and I could show you what I am talking about. Do you have any links, or are you going from memory here, too?
As far as Dez is concerned, you get more slack cut if you are an all around player. I have no problem with Olsen being a pass-catching TE, but that means he has to operate at a higher standard because he is specializing. Which means I want to see him stop being soft, and lay out for poorly thrown balls, and be aggressive when he has a defender on him. Just having good hands on the passes that are well-thrown doesn’t make you a great TE, or immune from criticism.
I get what your saying, except....
that all of it ignores two things….
Jay Cutler running for his life, leading to some poor throws, and….
Double Coverage. Greg faced it a lot this year. He was often fighting off two guys in coverage, not one.
I’ll have those links you asked for in a few……
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Apr 6, 2010 11:33 PM CDT up reply actions
Ok, I hate to do this,
but the only Olsen lowlights I can find were from Your Boy Roy on youtube. Laugh if you will, but he illustrates his points very very well on film.
Check out the vids showing exact examples of why Greg Olsen is softer than a marshmallow.
http://bit.ly/bAApwX
http://bit.ly/aN8OPH
http://bit.ly/cqPvd5
Roy?
I’m not laughing. Not at all. Roy needs to learn some physics before he tries commenting. Especially considering the first clip. What a dumb@ss. I refuse to accept any argument that includes Roy. I expected better from you, Lobo. ;)
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Apr 8, 2010 12:29 AM CDT up reply actions
Another problem with Roy is the.....
Whole slo-mo thing, where he acts as if ten frames is an adaquate time to react to a play. The guy is a complete idiot, or a complete fraud, take your pick.
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Apr 8, 2010 12:32 AM CDT up reply actions
I think we're carrying on the same convo on two different sections, but
Roy picks good footage. I have one video showing Clark bowling over a guy for more yardage despite being hit by a quick moving safety. Then we see Olsen getting stuck for no YAC on the same type of pass.
It’s hard to illustrate the way someone plays from a handful of examples. So we can go back and forth on this one. But overall, Olsen has shown over the majority of his playing time to be soft. With good hands. Except in critical situations.
OK, I'm not sure...
if your example is exaclty why I hate Roy. Physics. Olsen play…..DB was in motion on a good angle towards Olsen. DB wins this, regardless of TE 99% of the tiime.
Clark play, DB stops to set feet. Clark running, DB stopped. TE win’s this one 99% of time. Momentum and force. 1600 lbs of pressure (on average) would be the force impact hitting Olsen. Clark is the one delivering the force impact on his play. These are not the same type of play, at least as far as physics goes. Opinion is subjective. Physics is not. Roy is a dishonest idiot who is confusing an awful lot of people through dishonesty.
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Apr 8, 2010 9:06 AM CDT up reply actions
should have read....
OK, Im’not sure if you understand that your example is exactly why I hate Roy.
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Apr 8, 2010 9:06 AM CDT up reply actions
roy is just
high, very high. yet another pseudo-intellectual stoner. his college courses should have included a basic one in film editing/art, or anything that would stop the extra 8-9 minutes of slop in his critiques of whatever player he deems necessary to bag on. it’s like reading an ayn rand book except the good stuff isn’t even all that good. i did like the one about hester blowing bell’s superlong run against the eagles. except of course the 8 minutes of video debris mixed in.
to me this new offense is olsen’s best chance yet to uh, blossom (yeah, i said it). vertical passing game is where this guy can really shine and hopefully he makes the most of it.
by reefermadness3 on Apr 8, 2010 7:49 AM CDT up reply actions
haha!
"When I played pro football, I never set out to hurt anyone deliberately - unless it was, you know, important, like a league game or something." ~ Dick Butkus
by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Apr 8, 2010 8:52 AM CDT up reply actions
yeah,
I loved the Ayn Rand reference.
-------
"Newbie, if the next two words out of your mouth aren't 'See ya' then the third word will be 'Oh my god. My crotch. You've punched me in my crotch." - Dr. Percival Ulysses Cox
by David Taylor on Apr 8, 2010 10:55 AM CDT up reply actions
I could really not care less
If he scores 15 TDs and is soft I will be cool with him. I don’t think he’s soft though, just because he’s big doesn’t mean he has to break every tackle. If every big guy broke every tackle, RBs wouldn’t be mostly under 6’ (I know there are exceptions)
I'll break down some games on Olsen
as soon as the season starts. I suspect he’ll grade out OK as a blocker. The couple games I really watched him last year he blocked pretty good.
"When I played pro football, I never set out to hurt anyone deliberately - unless it was, you know, important, like a league game or something." ~ Dick Butkus
by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Apr 6, 2010 12:36 PM CDT up reply actions
Footwork is why he isn't a good blocker, as well as mentality.
His mental focus is set to catch, not block. That is unfortunate……
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The act of doing the same thing over and over again while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Apr 6, 2010 12:11 PM CDT up reply actions
uh huh. footwork.
sorry but that is such a BS excuse. cause who needs strength and toughness? it is all about footwork. in fact footwork is the only thing he’s got, cause he doesnt have the strength or the toughness, but what kind of football player needs those anyway (not greg olsen obviously), if you’re a kicker.
WOW....
just wow……….
Can you actually base an argument on anything but your raw emotions?
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The act of doing the same thing over and over again while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Apr 6, 2010 1:48 PM CDT up reply actions
And to actually respond to the point....
why do we care who the line coach is if technique isn’t the key? Why not just go out and get a bunch of body builders to man the line? Because………YOUR ARGUMENT IS SOFT!
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The act of doing the same thing over and over again while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Apr 6, 2010 1:49 PM CDT up reply actions
Footwork is very important
Olsen did 23 reps at the combine which is not bad at all, (Clark had only one more)
What does being soft have to do with his blocking?
There are lineman that use finesse and not brute force to block and are very good at it.Does that make them soft just because they dont fit “your” idea of what makes a player tough? I would say taking big hits getting up and continuing to play is a big part of what makes a player tough. A “soft” player wouldn’t do that and would be scared to get hit and i dont think Olsen falls into that category. He’s not your prototypical TE, we get it but Finesse and soft are not the same thing.
L.A.----Where playing Like the Sparks is tolerated by a Hall of Fame coach.....
by EmmCeee on Apr 6, 2010 6:36 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
exactly.....+1
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The act of doing the same thing over and over again while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Apr 6, 2010 7:02 PM CDT up reply actions
Not all TE are built the same
Depending on the team TE have different purposes, whether to block or to catch. To say he can’t block is calling out half the TE in the NFL.
I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.
Also +1
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Apr 6, 2010 7:59 PM CDT up reply actions
His problems blocking
seems to be as much about reading defenses as being tall and (relatively) skinny. Also the broken tackles (which, adjusted for # of receptions is different by a whopping 2 tackles) stats are way way too small of samples to be helpful.
by Sound_Automatic on Apr 6, 2010 11:47 PM CDT up reply actions
so comparing yearly.....
sacks shouldn’t be done either, considering that the sample is just as small, and spread out over even more snaps…..would apply to pancakes, sacks allowed, batted balls, drops, TDs and a host of other stats as well.
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Apr 7, 2010 12:39 AM CDT up reply actions
Given that Olsen eats puppies and if puppies are soft
since you are what you eat, then Olsen is soft. Not quite a mathematical proof but close.
If you can't laugh at yourself you must not be very funny.
Ummm...
Not sure that I agree with your logic there. Puppies are actually Hard (to eat) because they’re so cute. They’re also very wiggly which makes them hard (to eat.)
So since puppies are cute and wiggly and thus hard to eat and since Olsen eats puppies which is hard then Olsen must be hard.
I've heard that.......
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The act of doing the same thing over and over again while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Apr 6, 2010 1:52 PM CDT up reply actions
:)
Leave it to SMD…….
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The act of doing the same thing over and over again while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Apr 6, 2010 2:00 PM CDT up reply actions
♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Apr 7, 2010 12:41 AM CDT up reply actions
good thing he ain't eatin cats
..cause then we could say he was eatin…well, never mind
"Do or do not... there is no try." - Yoda
I think that's what Urlacher was thinking bout Cutler.
If you can't laugh at yourself you must not be very funny.
by Just Dave on Apr 6, 2010 8:08 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
Made me spit soda!! LOL!
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Apr 6, 2010 8:09 PM CDT up reply actions
That's racist
I always turn to the sports section first. The sports page records people's accomplishments; the front page has nothing but man's failures.
~Earl Warren
by lookingdeadred on Apr 6, 2010 2:03 PM CDT up reply actions
lmao!
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The act of doing the same thing over and over again while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Apr 6, 2010 5:14 PM CDT up reply actions
teddy bear?
Dude cries and complains every time he doesn’t make a reception. He needs to work his mouth less and hit others in the mouth more. He’ll be fine as soon as he changes his attitude.
+1
Is anyone else sick of seeing more and more flopping in the NFL and NBA? Legs kicking, arms flailing, head snapping back like a pedestrian who just got clipped by a pickup at 40 mph? Think there’s a little too much international soccer-style drama creeping in.
Flopping is an artform in the NBA
"When I played pro football, I never set out to hurt anyone deliberately - unless it was, you know, important, like a league game or something." ~ Dick Butkus
by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Apr 6, 2010 12:37 PM CDT up reply actions
I like Olsen
He has weaknesses, but he is an excellent receiving TE and has become a favorite of Cutler.
I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.
I would be happy if. . .
he would just stop calling for a flag every play he plays.
Reminds me of the boy who called wolf
As for blocking, make him work out with Tice 1/2 the time
I had a feeling
This post would turn into a Greg Olsen sucks or Greg Olsen is soft thread instead of the actual intent, pointing out the TE is not lost in a Martz offense.
"When I played pro football, I never set out to hurt anyone deliberately - unless it was, you know, important, like a league game or something." ~ Dick Butkus
by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Apr 6, 2010 2:33 PM CDT reply actions
See what happens when you bring up Olsen in a perfectly logical sense?
Everything goes to hell.
by Steven Schweickert on Apr 6, 2010 6:01 PM CDT up reply actions
yeah...
shame on me…
"When I played pro football, I never set out to hurt anyone deliberately - unless it was, you know, important, like a league game or something." ~ Dick Butkus
by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Apr 7, 2010 8:36 AM CDT up reply actions
FB
I’m really curious what we’re going to do at FB. Obviously that will have a huge impact on how Olsen is used.
No FB? New TE (Manu…) as FB? That FB that we picked-up from the Skins’?
Very interesting that Martz used to be a TE. I would not have guessed that, but I find that encouraging that he’ll be able to use our plethora of TEs effectively.
The Martz offense
uses an H-Back more than a traditional FB… It’s basically a TE that is off-set so he can motion across formation or motion to the FB position. Maun will be that guy, Olsen will see time at H-Back, and the new FB signed from the Redskins can play as an H-Back as well.
An H-Back lets the Bears change the strength of the point of attack, for example by lining up a TE on the line, and an H-Back opposite him out of the huddle, then the H-Back can motion to the TE side and give the offense an extra blocker at the point of attack after giving an even look.
"When I played pro football, I never set out to hurt anyone deliberately - unless it was, you know, important, like a league game or something." ~ Dick Butkus
by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Apr 6, 2010 3:08 PM CDT up reply actions
this manu fella
should make a few lb’s wish they hit a different hole on the run this year
by reefermadness3 on Apr 7, 2010 1:36 AM CDT up reply actions
Look at the offense Maun was in the last few years
A Norv Turner offense, similar to what Martz will run. He started a number of games for the Chargers along with their pass catching TE Antonio Gates.
"When I played pro football, I never set out to hurt anyone deliberately - unless it was, you know, important, like a league game or something." ~ Dick Butkus
by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Apr 7, 2010 8:42 AM CDT up reply actions
Martz HB vs FB
Thanks for the insight Lester!
So lets see, we’ll often have 5 OLineman, QB, RB, HB, TE, and 2 WRs (as our base package) – is that what you predict? Sometimes we’ll swap out the TE (or the HB?) for a 3rd WR — perhaps 25-50% of the time?
That would seem to be a good way to effectively use the personel that we have.
sounds about right...
He’ll may bring out the 4 WR sets with a RB or a TE, and he may use some empty sets either with 4 WR and a motioning tailback or just with 5 receivers lined up …
If you have the time check out the 2000 Rams playbook, you can see all the formations he used back then
"When I played pro football, I never set out to hurt anyone deliberately - unless it was, you know, important, like a league game or something." ~ Dick Butkus
by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Apr 6, 2010 3:31 PM CDT up reply actions
I remember seeing an article somewhere that said Martz is making a whole new playbook for the Bears to fit the personnel
If that is true, good news for Olsen.
Lifelong Arizona Cardinals/Chicago Bears fan.
I can't stand fair-weather/bandwagon fans, stick with your team, throughout the good and the bad.
Me personally can not
understand why people assume that Olsen is the odd man out here….Considering that John Clayton, Bradd Biggs, and Dickerson all have stated that it is Clark that could be the odd man out NOT Olsen….Heck even have PFT reporting it now:
"In an infinite universe where reality is interpreted through our continuously fluctuating perception, providing absolute definitive proof of anything becomes a little more than speculation based on random data....."
- Jerry Angelo on how he prepares for the NFL draft
Thank you Lester
I have been trying to say this all offseason. There is no WAY an “offensive genius” who stems from the Coryell tree could not utilize a TE like Greg Olsen.
"Dick Butkus once tackled the Packers."
"Dick Butkus played all 11 defensive positions...at the same time."
"Dick Butkus once sacked a quarterback simply by looking at him."
A couple points
1. Greg Olsen is not that good. We want him to be good, we’ve been told how good he is, but I haven’t seen it. What I’ve seen is a TE who struggles to get open and is not at all elusive after the catch.
2. Maybe Mike Martz has never had a TE like Greg Olsen (aside from Vernon Davis) because he doesn’t WANT a TE like Olsen. The original poster uses Martz’s lack of history with pass-catching TEs to suggest that he’s never had the opportunity to use one before.
But maybe he just doesn’t want one. He seems to think (and I can’t see much flaw in his logic), that an inline TE should be blocking, and if you want another pass-catcher put in another WR.
One of the reasons Olsen struggled to get open is because he is so one-dimensional. They knew he wasn’t there to block, so if he was in teams put a nickel corner on him. That’s a mismatch that Olsen isn’t going to win.
I would LOVE for the Bears to package Olsen to move up to get a legit free safety. I don’t think Olsen is very good on any offense, and he’s borderline worthless in this system.
DEJESUS!!!
IDK about that
Olsen caught more than 30% of Cutler’s Td passes which put him as the 4th most in the league as far as TE’s go with 8. He’s also in the top 10 among Te’s in catches resulting in 1st downs, which is a pretty important stat. Nevermind he is doing all of this in a offense that wasnt particularly prolific. I think that in itself makes what he did impressive imo. His YAC was the same as Tony Gonzalez and im sure Oslen didnt get alot of catches in space and on time being that Cutler rarely had the time to find him and put the ball where its supposed to be
L.A.----Where playing Like the Sparks is tolerated by a Hall of Fame coach.....
To paraphrase Bill Parcells
Martz was doing the cooking not shopping for the groceries…
And if you really watch enough Bears games you’d see plenty of times Olsen was blocking. He’s not always out in the pattern. Many times he has a read to make whether he stays in and blocks or releases to a pattern, and other times he stays in and helps the tackle.
"When I played pro football, I never set out to hurt anyone deliberately - unless it was, you know, important, like a league game or something." ~ Dick Butkus
by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Apr 7, 2010 8:40 AM CDT up reply actions
cooking/groceries
If that were true, Martz’ first order of business wouldn’t be to essentially replace Olsen with an inline TE. He clearly knows what he wants from a TE, and it isn’t finesse. He’s also publically said that a TE should block first, and that if he wanted someone to split out an run patterns he’s put a WR in.
It’s nice to want and hope that Olsen fits ths system and is as great as we’ve been told, it just isn’t the case.
DEJESUS!!!
Please look at the playbook
TE’s are all over the place, and not just as blockers. Manu started in SD with Antonio Gates in a similar system as Martz runs. Jason McKie was cut to make room for Manu. He wasn’t brought in to replace Olsen, otherwise he’d be gone by now.
As I wrote above the basic Gillman/Coryell system can take advantage of a TE… Antonio Gates, Kellen Winslow, Jay Novackek, Dave Casper
"When I played pro football, I never set out to hurt anyone deliberately - unless it was, you know, important, like a league game or something." ~ Dick Butkus
by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Apr 7, 2010 10:56 AM CDT up reply actions
I don't have a copy of the Bears playbook handy
particularly a copy of the Mike Martz Bears playbook.
But I do know he does not use a lot of two tight end sets. When he does use a TE, it is usually an inline TE, and his responsibilities are usually blocking first and short releases second. This didn’t change with Vernon Davis, who is a far superior blocker and a superior receiver. So I doubt that Manu got a mega-contract to back up Greg Olsen, and I doubt they’ll both be on the field a lot.
The reason Olsen is still a Bear is nobody would give them anything for him. It’s not worth dropping him for a 6th round pick, they might as well see if they can find some use for him. But if someone offered them a second or third rounder, or a way to package him and a pick to get in the second round, he’ll be gone.
Lastly, Martz doesn’t run the basic Gillman/Coryell system. He runs a derivative of that. And his system uses a single TE as a third tackle. He hasn’t changed that philosophy in the past when he’s had a good receiving TE, and his actions (signing Manu to a huge deal) and his words (saying that TEs need to block first and that if he wants someone to run routes he’d rather have a WR do it) do not suggest that he’s changed his philosophy.
Again, I wish Olsen was as good as advertised, and I wish he fit in this system. I also appreciate all the work you did in this post. With all due respect though, it seems like you are making an argument that you want to believe despite evidence to the contrary.
DEJESUS!!!
RTFA
-------
"Newbie, if the next two words out of your mouth aren't 'See ya' then the third word will be 'Oh my god. My crotch. You've punched me in my crotch." - Dr. Percival Ulysses Cox
evidence or opinion?
Not the actual Bears 2010 playbook, but as I wrote and linked above, here is his Rams playbook
look at the plays in that playbook… TE on the field a lot with an H-Back. In St. Louis he didn’t have a TE with hands. So that wasn’t a big part of the gameplan. It may be used in Chicago though, we’ll never know
The Bears cut McKie cuz he wasn’t in the plans, they cut Alex Brown cuz he wasn’t in the plans, they could have cut Olsen by now had he not been in the plans… and who knows he still may be moved or cut.
"When I played pro football, I never set out to hurt anyone deliberately - unless it was, you know, important, like a league game or something." ~ Dick Butkus
by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Apr 7, 2010 2:32 PM CDT up reply actions
Brown was cut
because he made 5 mil, was 30, and would be a backup now that Peppers was playing RE. McKie was cut because he wasn’t needed. Olsen doesn’t make much and has perceived value. If they could have gotten value for him he’d be gone, but it wouldn’t make sense to cut him now.
I get your article, you wrote it well, I just think you are wrong. I am not going to keep repeating the reasons why. I guess we’ll just see.
DEJESUS!!!
V Davis is a superior blocker? Since when?
Cause he’s lower rated then Olsen…..
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Apr 7, 2010 4:37 PM CDT up reply actions
I don't know what ratings
you are using, but color me skeptical on how accurate they are.
“I don’t know if there’s ever been a tight end that can block better than Vernon Davis,” Singletary said.
Anyone ever say that about Greg Olsen?
DEJESUS!!!
profootballfocus.com.....
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Apr 8, 2010 12:35 AM CDT up reply actions
I think Davis is a better blocker than Olsen
But he’s no road grader, as far as pass catching TE’s go he does block fairly well
"When I played pro football, I never set out to hurt anyone deliberately - unless it was, you know, important, like a league game or something." ~ Dick Butkus
by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Apr 8, 2010 8:55 AM CDT up reply actions
8 TDs
HELLO
you play to win the game
lawl
8 TDS is top 10 in TE’s last year.
Hello?
yeah
Do or do not there is not try-Master Yoda
Are we still on this subject?
Olsen will be fine in the offense, and so will Cutler. The Oline will be stable under Tice.
The real cause for concern is the Receivers.
You can't see California without Marlon Brando's eyes.
Are we still on the Wide Receivers?
Chuck Norris once met Dick Butkus and had a very odd feeling come over him. Chuck later realized it was fear
by BearNecessities on Apr 7, 2010 6:06 AM CDT up reply actions
Airese Currie?
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Apr 7, 2010 9:20 AM CDT up reply actions
I'd take him, seriously......
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Apr 7, 2010 9:59 AM CDT up reply actions
Crack is whack, my friend...
You can't see California without Marlon Brando's eyes.
by ifuwannacrownem on Apr 7, 2010 10:18 AM CDT up reply actions
Bradley.
You can't see California without Marlon Brando's eyes.
by ifuwannacrownem on Apr 7, 2010 10:21 AM CDT up reply actions
is horrible.
-------
"Newbie, if the next two words out of your mouth aren't 'See ya' then the third word will be 'Oh my god. My crotch. You've punched me in my crotch." - Dr. Percival Ulysses Cox
i hear bobby wade's free
he can return punts too.
also i’m sure we could get marty booker cheap
and maybe trade hester and bennet in a package to get brandon lloyd
Do or do not there is not try-Master Yoda
Don't...
give Angelo any ideas……
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Apr 9, 2010 11:04 AM CDT up reply actions
Hope you're right about the OL
but I suspect you are being overly optimistic. They need an OG so Omiyale can move out to RT, then I will feel better about the OL.
I always turn to the sports section first. The sports page records people's accomplishments; the front page has nothing but man's failures.
~Earl Warren
by lookingdeadred on Apr 7, 2010 8:26 AM CDT up reply actions
not overly optimistic.
but Tice is the real deal. Plus there’s no way the line could do worse than they did last year[knock on wood]
You can't see California without Marlon Brando's eyes.
by ifuwannacrownem on Apr 7, 2010 10:18 AM CDT up reply actions
I agree Tice will be a big benefit
I always turn to the sports section first. The sports page records people's accomplishments; the front page has nothing but man's failures.
~Earl Warren
by lookingdeadred on Apr 7, 2010 2:13 PM CDT up reply actions
Check the records, if you must.
They will show Marinelli failing in Detroit, and Tice Succeeding in Jacksonville.
Indeed, it does take a lot more than one single entity to be effective on this offense, But you can’t ignore Tice’s track record.
Nihlus… I’ll never forget that duel.
You can't see California without Marlon Brando's eyes.
by ifuwannacrownem on Apr 7, 2010 6:03 PM CDT up reply actions
I thought this topic died yesterday
Guess I was wrong
I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.
This topic wil never die
until the season starts and we all see how Olsen will be utilized
"When I played pro football, I never set out to hurt anyone deliberately - unless it was, you know, important, like a league game or something." ~ Dick Butkus
by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Apr 7, 2010 10:59 AM CDT up reply actions
At the rate it's goin
I wouldn’t be surprised if it didn’t die until the day Olsen retires from the leauge
You can't see California without Marlon Brando's eyes.
by ifuwannacrownem on Apr 7, 2010 11:48 AM CDT up reply actions
Sadly thats how players
Finally get their due.
I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.
or he's traded on draft day.
-------
"Newbie, if the next two words out of your mouth aren't 'See ya' then the third word will be 'Oh my god. My crotch. You've punched me in my crotch." - Dr. Percival Ulysses Cox
Guess it depends on who drafts a TE
And who needs one.
I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.
i could still
see us trading olsen to the pats for one of their second rounders if there’s a player we REALLY REALLY want where they are. I keep hearing how pats fans would want olsen for one of their second rounders, so it could happen.
I hope not though, olsen would be a pro bowler in that offense with brady. and then we might take a TE with one of our higher picks.
And we all know how teams look to the fans to get an ok to make a trade..
Adrian Pedestrian!! Now that's funny Mr. Bayless...
Comment #200!
Sorry, I couldn’t resist. :P
"A lot of fans were drawn to me because they knew that whatever the score was, I was going to run as hard as I could on every play. You don't have that now, you have guys waiting for next week or even next year." - Walter Payton
As surprised as I WANT to be...
Somehow, I can’t bring myself to actually BE surprised.
by Steven Schweickert on Apr 7, 2010 5:27 PM CDT up reply actions
OK everyone!
You are not going to convince either side, so please, let this thread die quietly and with some dignity left, for the love of all that is holy, this needs to end.
I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.

by 
























