Sayers' Chicago Bears Anger: A Solution?
Dear Chicago Bears,
Gale Sayers was elite, back when elite was still being defined.
That much is undeniable. During his career, he was one of the best, until he was forced out by injury. As a Hall of Famer, his words reverberate throughout the community.
So when he recently spoke out about the Bears, it caught people off guard. He had some things to say, and none of them were particularly kind.
"Cutler hasn't done the job," Sayers said. "Urlacher, I don't know how good he's going to be coming back. He's 33 years old. They need a couple wide receivers, a couple defensive backs. They haven't done a good job."
I have to say, while I disagree with some of Mr. Sayers' comments, he's got some points, and they directly involve you.
Not so much with those first two comments. Cutler didn't do the greatest, that's for certain. Urlacher, though it seems likely he'll return to solid performance, is indeed older. However, the receiving corps, while still young, shows a lot of promise. Defensive backs, I think, have also been shored up quite a bit by the draft of Wright and the trade for Harris.
No, what I have to disagree with is the tone of the words. For example, later in the article, the following quote comes up:
"You can't compare that, because he gets hurt too much," Sayers said. "He's a fine young man. He's a little light. He's not a player who's going to carry 25 times a game. He'll get five carries, catch three passes and run back a couple punts."
Sayers pointed out that he made $50,000 in his final season and a total of $275,000 over his entire career. He said he would like to be playing today.
"You know why? Because of the money," he said. "I wouldn't change my game. I probably would be just as good because I would be on AstroTurf. The money, that's the key right now. Everybody is making so much. A person snapping the football is making a million dollars."
I'll be honest, that hurt me a little to read. The tone suggests that a lot of the negativity is coming from the resentment that players nowadays make a lot of money.
And that's fair. If I did my job, only to watch people do my job later in life, maybe not as well, and make a lot more, I'd be upset too. That's natural. Some of the resentment, too, may be seated in something else:
Other than a few public appearance he makes on behalf of the Bears, he said, he has little contact with the team these days.
"I go to every game I can," he said. "Yes, I do live and die with them."
And this is another place that I can help agree with him. The Chicago Bears are doing it wrong if they're not including Gale Sayers as much as they can. Use him as an ambassador of the game. Get him the fees he's looking for, because he's a living legend for a team with the most rich history of any in the NFL.
The logic behind not utilizing some of the most popular players, not just for your team, but all-time football, is mind-boggling. Yes, you want to keep things "relevant", but these are the resources taht show you're one of the greatest franchises in football.
So go be great again.
Sincerely,
Kev
23 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Sounds extremely bitter
Hasn’t he made his living off of his name, and partly what the NFL did for him?
I think it’s fair to complain about how the organization has conducted business the past few years, but they’ve done the best they could this offseason.
''I'm really not a Facebook or Twitter guy. I'm a prime rib and baked potato guy.'' - Sweet Lou
His words reflect his frustration as a fan of the team he loves and felt honored to play for.
His comments fall right in line with the comments here at WCG. Nothing he said hasn’t been echoed on this board. Perhaps is the Bears had kept him engaged in some capacity he’d be more judicious in his comments, but if he’s unable to affect what Bears management does he certainly is entitled to complain as any fan might.
Sure
I just have a problem with him not at all addressing what they did this offseason. Were the past three years filled with mistakes across the board? Absolutely. For him not to mention anything positive about the team speaks volumes in my humble opinion. He’s venting as a fan, but I think there’s more to it than that. He sounds a bit upset about not having a role in the organization.
''I'm really not a Facebook or Twitter guy. I'm a prime rib and baked potato guy.'' - Sweet Lou
I understand where you're coming from but at this time last year
we were all sure we were a better team than we were the year before after the other “blockbuster” off-season deal we made. Turns out, we weren’t.
I think his point is what we have done in the past, where there is some track record to go by, hasn’t worked out. While a lot of people like the Peppers deal, there were several other “experts” that say he’s on the downside of his career and may not be the dominant player he was a few years ago. Also, letting Alex Brown go puts us in another unknown area at the other DE spot, so some of the gains we made could be negated by that move.
I don’t think his comments about Urlacher were that negative. All he said was “he’s 33” and he didn’t know if he would come back and be as dominant as he was before. I think that’s a fair conclusion to draw.
Peppers
He’s an elite talent/DE, and typically these types of players age well. Someone like Brown who hasn’t had any kind of sustained success rushing the passer fade away in obscurity without much notice.
''I'm really not a Facebook or Twitter guy. I'm a prime rib and baked potato guy.'' - Sweet Lou
I wasn't comparing Alex to Peppers
just saying that with Brown’s departure, the other DE spot is a question mark at this point. Without a steady performer like AB, the offenses are better able to account for Peppers, which could lessen his effectiveness.
I wonder if he was saying anything during the Wanny and Juaron era.
Adrian Pedestrian!! Now that's funny Mr. Bayless...
Yeah seriously
This current group has produced only the second SB appearance in the modern era. The previous regimes after Ditka were atrocious to say the least.
''I'm really not a Facebook or Twitter guy. I'm a prime rib and baked potato guy.'' - Sweet Lou
Well, I can't remember exactly what post it was but it was a while back..
When someone interviewed some old Bears including Richard Dent and Wilbur Marshall. Their comments for the most part were negative also but you kind of have to realize that they are speaking that way because they love the Bears and want to see them improve. If they didn’t care at all sure they would say Bears are fine blah blah, but they do care and that’s why they offer their opinion as harsh as it may be.
As far as the Mangement is concerned, this past offseason in my opinion was the biggest splash I have seen from the Bears in well, forever. I was thinking it would be great if they got Julius Peppers but didn’t think it would happen. Then they got Peppers and Chester Taylor in the same day?? Is this my Chicago Bears, making splashes and looking like they actually want to win? Then you got the trade for Chris Harris and i thought wow, The Bears are actually doing all they can to improve the team and win. Ever since 2006 can anyone really say that with a straight face that they did all they could in order to win?
All in all, I think the Bears are moving in the right direction. Yeah they raised ticket prices but if it makes them more competitive and brings us back to the playoffs I would say it was worth it.
by Chitownproduct on May 10, 2010 12:11 PM CDT reply actions
I've always thought
the Bears do a terrible job of keeping their past players involved in the Bears family.
"When I played pro football, I never set out to hurt anyone deliberately - unless it was, you know, important, like a league game or something." ~ Dick Butkus
by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on May 10, 2010 12:27 PM CDT reply actions 1 recs
Wow
The Bears are a better team than they were when they last played a game Jan 3rd 2010. Before I comment on how much better I’m going to wait until they actually play in September.
by Dozjah on May 10, 2010 12:32 PM CDT via mobile reply actions
The truth hurts.
Mr. Sayers said it and it was hurtful. Is he bitter? I dunno, he makes some points which will always be debated. What I don’t think is open for debate is his love for the Bears and his love for the game.
The McCaskey’s have always been and continue to be poor stewards of the Halas Tradition. They don’t make the demands of the players and management that are necessary to create and maintain a dynasty. To them it’s just a business, just a profit center. They don’t value the contributions of the players past that allowed the franchise to shine, even if briefly. So any knocks Mr. Sayers makes I think are more directed at them than the city, the fans or the team. Just my observation.
by Suffering from Chicago Sports on May 10, 2010 2:53 PM CDT reply actions
Why mention Urlacher and Cutler then?
''I'm really not a Facebook or Twitter guy. I'm a prime rib and baked potato guy.'' - Sweet Lou
Urlachers 33
and Culter hasn’t done the job. Wow. You’re right, that’s harsh criticism. Oh, wait, that’s just an observation. What’s the context of these statements? Did Gale call a presser to announce this? Then he really is on the attack. Or was he asked what he thinks of the current Bears (most likely)? Than this is a fair and really not too critical assessment. Big deal.
If you can't laugh at yourself you must not be very funny.
I was responding to this
So any knocks Mr. Sayers makes I think are more directed at them than the city, the fans or the team.
Never said anything about an obvious observation by an ex-Bear. A brain-dead fan could say Cutler sucked last year, or Urlacher isn’t an elite MLB anymore. I was disputing SFCS’s notion that Gale was directing his angst towards the McCaskeys.
''I'm really not a Facebook or Twitter guy. I'm a prime rib and baked potato guy.'' - Sweet Lou
And people who actually a part of the team
would disagree wholeheartedly with you about this, at least where Virginia is concerned:
The McCaskey’s (sic) have always been and continue to be poor stewards of the Halas Tradition.
No one ever says anything except the opposite about Virginia. But I reckon there are plenty of other McCaskeys you could be talking about.
I don't know, they have really tried to separate themselves from the Ditka/Vanisi/Finks teams,
and Virginia has let them do it. My guess is people don’t say anything negative about her out of respect for her age and her father, but what has she done to make the former Bears a part of the present group?
Name two.
I can’t instantly recall any former player who has sung the praises of them as great owners or stewards of the Halas tradition. If I am misinformed or under-informed, please educate me.
Dane, I read here often, your are always insightful and informed, so inform me.
My post is my opinion/observation about what Mr. Sayers was saying. I am Captain Obvious.
by Suffering from Chicago Sports on May 11, 2010 10:41 AM CDT up reply actions
I am specifically seperating Virginia from the rest of the McCaskey family
when it comes to being stewards of the Halas tradition.
Your original comment was about the family as a whole. My reply separated Virginia. Your reply back was again about the collective family.
I won’t argue that there is a lot of dysfunction with the team, both inside and outside the family, but I will argue that Virginia is, at least in a figurehead sort of way, the very definition of tradition.






















