Windy City Gridiron: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: College Football Rankings - BlogPoll Top 25

Is The NFC North Really That Tough?

 

Nfc-north_medium

For a while now I've noticed a trend gaining momentum.  Seems that more and more people are dropping comments about how the NFC North is arguably the strongest division in the NFC, in the NFL, in the Galaxy, and so on.  Now, it is within the realm of possibility that things might heat up in the frigid north this December.  Green Bay, or Minnesota, or Chicago might win the division with the other two taking the wild card spots.  But then, there are a lot of question marks in this division that make predicting the outcome pretty tough.

Strength of schedule won't be prohibitive, as the NFC North's average SOS is .501 for 2010, which is the 4th lowest of the 8 division.  And Chicago and Detroit definitely took steps in the right direction during the off season.  But how stable were Minnesota and Green Bay?  And did Chicago and Detroit do enough to turn out winning, or in Detroit's case, competitive seasons?

Now, Mr Hayes posted, very boldly I might add, a couple of days ago that he felt Chicago would win the division.  I like that prediction.  It's actually what prompted me to write this post.  As I scanned through the comments, I noticed a lot of members that felt that Green Bay, or Minnesota, was the division favorite.  It's not exactly a stretch to pick either one.  But the certainty some seem to have that these two teams, especially the hated Packers, are stable kinda took me by surprise. 

First, the Bears have made moves to improve this off season.  How effective those moves will be is yet to be seen, but the subject has been discussed at length here so, just for the sake of argument, we'll assume that the Bears are 3 games better than they were last year.  10-6.  I think that this is a fairly conservative estimate, and not out of the Bears reach at all.

The real question are.......is Minnesota better than they were last year?  Is Green Bay better? And how much better did Detroit get.  Because those three questions will have a lot to do with the fate of Our Beloved Bears.

If Favre returns, I say Minnesota is in good shape.  The Williams Wall is aging, but running and backpedaling to avoid their suspensions is going to help them an awful lot where conditioning is concerned.  I don't really see anywhere that the Queens have declined, other than backup RB.  And with a full year of experience between Favre and the WRs, the Queens might be better this year.  The line isn't as good as it once was, but it's still probably the best OL in the division.  BUT.......if Favre doesn't come back, the Queens offense is in trouble, and Childress and the Purple Parade know it.  The difference between Brett Favre and Tarvaris Jackson, for the Vikings, is the difference between 1st place ad 3rd place in the NFC North, in my humble opinion.

Green Bay is another story.  I thought that the Packers were actually the best team in the division last season.....except for one thing.  They had matadors for tackles and the interior line wasn't much better.  And boy did it hurt.  And what did the Pack do to fix this?  They resigned everybody.  Sure, they drafted Marshall Newhouse.  And Newhouse might help shore up the interior line some.  But when the Pack have to face Julius Peppers, Jared Allen or Kyle Vanden Bosch in 6 of it's 16 games (not to mention Izzy!), you would think that Green Bay would have done something to shore up the Tackle situation more than just signing Chris Campbell, an undraft FA out of Eastern Illinois.  As much as you can read comments here stating that "as goes the line so goes the season" in reference to the Bears, it surprises me that so many just unquestioningly pick the Pack to win the division.  I have my doubts, and they all center on the cheeseheads' offensive line.

And thanks to Hurricanes becoming Bears for pointing out that I, in a wonderfully boneheaded move, glossed right over the Packers 1st round pick......Iowa' Tackle Bryan Bulaga.  Bulaga is an impressive specimen, and was a solid pickup by the pack.  But current expectations are that he will back up Chad Clifton for now, though a move to guard might be considered.  So, will Bulaga make a difference this year?  It doesn't appear so, but it's early and things change.

As for Detroit, I think the lowly Lions will be the most improved team in the division this season.  I still think they have a couple of seasons to go before challenging for the division is realistic, but I think they are moving in the right direction........finally.  6 or 7 wins would not surprise me in the least.  And if Favre decides to spend the regular season on the sofa, then it could be plausible for Detroit could finish 3rd in the division......or they could be Detroit all over again, and win 2 games.  Ford does still own that team, after all.

So, lets here from the rest of you.  What are your thoughts on the division?  We all know anything can happen, but what do you think are the key factors in the season for the NFC North teams?

0 recs  |  Comment 101 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

What about Bulaga?

As an Iowa resident and graduate of the U of I, I noticed you failed to mention the Packers drafting the Hawkeye Bulaga in the first round. Was this intentional? I realize they resigned their aged bookend tackles, but a left tackle taken 23rd overall should be expected to contribute very early. They may stick with Tauscher and Clifton but I think they at least addressed the issue with more than Newhouse. I predict Bulaga at RT next year then moving to LT win Clifton’s legs fall apart like Tauscher’s. And as sad as it is to see so many quality Hawkeyes end up elsewhere in the NFC North, I think he will be more Long and Thomas than Gallery.

As for the question at hand, I believe the Queens were at best stagnant in their offseason (assuming Favra’s return), while the Pack just filled future holes, don’t know they got better. The Lions upgraded several positions but they’re still the Lions. I would say the 10-6 mark is about right, 26 interceptions and we still go 7-9. Five of those losses were close enough to win. I am optimistic so if that number gets cut in half, no reason they can’t go 10-6. Does that win the division, I say no, but I’ll take a wild card any year.

If God had wanted man to play soccer, he wouldn't have given us arms.- Mike Ditka

by Hurricanes becoming Bears on Jun 24, 2010 3:40 AM CDT reply actions  

Thank you......

I completely left out the aquisition of Bulaga in the first round, but not intentionally. I had a duh moment………..

That being said, Bulaga is expected to back up Chad Clifton this season, but eventually replace him. Personally, I can see that happening mid season. The Packers are reportedly wanting to keep Bulaga at lefft tackle, but considering moving him to guard if both he and Clifton are among the best linemen on the team after the preseason. If he gets moved t guard, I say the Pack suffer. Clifton cannot handle the Allens and Peppers of the league any more, and he proved it last year.

Bulaga is an impressive kid, and my failure to note the Packers drafting him was just that….a failure. But the question then becomes, will Bulaga be able to push Clifton aside in time to adjust and gel with the line and then improve it? Or will he end up a guard with Clifton turn-styling the LT position once again?

in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.

by T-Train on Jun 24, 2010 11:43 AM CDT up reply actions  

And the post has been corrected to reflect the catch.....

Thanks again…..

in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.

by T-Train on Jun 24, 2010 12:09 PM CDT up reply actions  

Wasn't trying to call you out

I figured you just missed him. But I agree with your assessment. I think he has the potential to contribute right away, but if he has to, I don’t think that bodes well for the Pack.

If God had wanted man to play soccer, he wouldn't have given us arms.- Mike Ditka

by Hurricanes becoming Bears on Jun 24, 2010 1:23 PM CDT up reply actions  

And I didn't take it that way, my friend. All is well :)

in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.

by T-Train on Jun 24, 2010 1:55 PM CDT up reply actions  

I still see a 3 team race

The Packers and Vikings had a lot go right for them last year and the Bears had a lot go wrong… In 2010 things could even out some

"When I played pro football, I never set out to hurt anyone deliberately - unless it was, you know, important, like a league game or something." ~ Dick Butkus

by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Jun 24, 2010 8:58 AM CDT reply actions  

All NFC North teams have fundamental questions and or flaws

so the division is really up for grabs. GB and Minny (assuming Favre returns) are legit contenders again. The Lions are much improved but have too much ground to make up to challenge this season, but I think they are a team on the rise. It is Chicago, however, who is arguably the most improved team. The acquisitions this offseason along with return to form (hopefully) of Urlacher, Kreutz and THarris, the movement of CWilliams and Omiyale to their natural positions on the OL all make the Bears a very different team. Add to that mix the new coaches, Martz and Tice, and the Bears look to be a much better team than we saw last season.

I always turn to the sports section first. The sports page records people's accomplishments; the front page has nothing but man's failures.
~Earl Warren

by lookingdeadred on Jun 24, 2010 9:21 AM CDT reply actions  

Division is up for grabs

Lions and Packers and Bears…. oh my!! (said the Viqueens)

This is a pretty well rounded division this year.

We’re gonna be a pretty violent bunch. ~Lance Briggs

by BearNecessities on Jun 24, 2010 10:08 AM CDT reply actions  

Hard to see the Lions challenging but

as the young talent gets more experience, they could be playing like contenders by the second half of the season. 2011 looks like the year they will challenge.

I always turn to the sports section first. The sports page records people's accomplishments; the front page has nothing but man's failures.
~Earl Warren

by lookingdeadred on Jun 24, 2010 10:39 AM CDT up reply actions  

I agree...

The Lions would have to have such a turn-around in order to compete for the division that it becomes highly unlikely they will this year. But I also agree that they could be the breakout team of 2011.

in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.

by T-Train on Jun 24, 2010 11:45 AM CDT up reply actions  

I just worry

about them pulling, most recently, a “dolphins”, and making the playoffs after having a terrible year the season before.

If I did what I love for a living, what would I do in my free time?

Writer at windycitygridiron.com {-/-} http://www.twitter.com/kdoggers

by Kev H on Jun 25, 2010 8:03 AM CDT up reply actions  

and how often do you

ahem…

pull your dolphin?

"When I played pro football, I never set out to hurt anyone deliberately - unless it was, you know, important, like a league game or something." ~ Dick Butkus

by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Jun 25, 2010 8:47 AM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

Nicely played.

If you can't laugh at yourself you must not be very funny.
I remain a pessimistically hopeful Bears fan.

by Just Dave on Jun 25, 2010 2:42 PM CDT up reply actions  

Gotta watch out

Underestimate someone and there’s a good chance they might beat you. We open with the Lions this year, and you know they’ll be itching to start the season strong. On paper, it’s all Bears, but look how many times the team that should win, doesn’t.

by Virto on Jun 24, 2010 4:39 PM CDT up reply actions  

That's kinda what I'm getting at

people are still saying “well, 2 guaranteed wins this year, we play DET” and the truth is, they hung with us last year, and only got better.

I look no further than Miami going 1-15 to 11-5 or something like that. Just because they didn’t make HUGE name trades, if they made the right moves, they can be a force to be recokened with.

We’re gonna be a pretty violent bunch. ~Lance Briggs

by BearNecessities on Jun 25, 2010 4:57 AM CDT up reply actions  

Among the toughest divisions in the league

NFC North > NFC West, NFC East, NFC South, AFC West

NFC North = AFC East, AFC South

AFC North toughest division in the NFL

by rdent4hof on Jun 24, 2010 10:26 AM CDT reply actions  

I love the optimism.....

But I can’t get over the feeling that you have underestimated the NFC South, NFC East and AFC South.

But I think that we can all agree that the west sucks, regardless of division……..

in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.

by T-Train on Jun 24, 2010 12:12 PM CDT up reply actions  

And yet we lost to the Niners last year, 10-6.

Especially painful because I live out here and was pretty damn sure that the Bears would take that one.

by oripunk3485 on Jun 25, 2010 12:38 AM CDT up reply actions  

Especially because

As bad as the Bears played, they still really would’ve won that one. That’s the thing that gets me the most, is that there’s several of those games where they were TERRRRRRRIBLE, and still were in position to win the game.

If I did what I love for a living, what would I do in my free time?

Writer at windycitygridiron.com {-/-} http://www.twitter.com/kdoggers

by Kev H on Jun 25, 2010 8:04 AM CDT up reply actions  

Looking forward then...

Playing just a little better in similar games this year could mean a 3-4 game difference in wins/losses.

by oripunk3485 on Jun 25, 2010 11:37 AM CDT up reply actions  

Cutler not throwing 4-5 int's

Will mean a 3-4 game difference in wins/losses.

Aw man I shot Marvin in the face.

by Acreman20 on Jun 25, 2010 2:18 PM CDT up reply actions  

Rdent has a point...

mostly it’s about the competition for the division. The NFC south has NO and ATL and that’s it Whereas the NFC North has 3 teams that could take the division. The difference is how close each team is, not how say NO compares to CHI, GB, and MN. The NFC East has only the Cowboys as the rest of the division is way behind. The AFC South has 2 contenders and the Jags/Titans lag behind. But, for now, that’s only speculation on my part. I don’t know if that makes it easier on the Bears or not.

IT'S NOT TOO LATE TO FIRE LOVIE!

by LostInSTL on Jun 25, 2010 9:08 PM CDT up reply actions  

But, to be fair.....

The Bears were ranked 21st in the ESPN power rankings for the pre-season. By contrast, The Saints are #1, The Falcons are #10, and the Panthers are # 18.

I know the poll is speculative, but lets be fair. Everything right now is speculative.

That being said……

Division- Average team ranking- Individual rankings…..
NFC North – 15.25 – MIN 3; GB 6; CHI 21; DET 31
NFC South – 14.75 – NO 1; ATL 10; CAR 18; TB 30
NFC East – 14.5 – DAL 5; PHI 13; NYG 17; WAS 23
NFC West – 21.25 – AZ 12; SF 15; SEA 26; StL 32

AFC North – 16 – BAL 7; CIN 11; PIT 19; CLE 27
AFC South – 14.25 – IND 2; HOU 14; TEN 16; JAX 25
AFC East – 16.75 – NYJ 8; NE 9; MIA 22; BUF 28
AFC West – 19.25 – SD 4; DEN 20; OAK 24; KC 29

SO…….per ESPN’s power rankings…..
1) AFC South 14.25
2) NFC East 14.5
3) NFC South 14.75
4) NFC North 15.25
5) AFC North 16
6) AFC East 16.75
7) AFC West 19.25
8) NFC West 21.25

Most of the power rankings were pretty similar, though the ESPN rankings were among the kindest to the NFC North (CBS Sports, for example, ranked GB 5th, MIN 6th, CHI 24th and Det 29th and USA Today had them listed 5,6 20 and 27 respectively. And there’s always the ever-confusing Peter King who ranked the Pack #1 overall, MIN 13, DET 24 and CHI 25)

Now, I just did the math on these divisions as I wrote the comment, so I didn’t expect the outcome. But funny enough, The three divisions that I thought were being under-rated are the three divisions with the highest average ranking. Of course, this is all based on the speculation posted by ESPN, so I do not present these numbers as proof of anything. Just something to think about…..

in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.

by T-Train on Jun 25, 2010 10:30 PM CDT up reply actions  

That's what makes speculation so much fun...

we can be wildly off the mark and it’s hard to dispute. I see your point here and I guess I am taking more of a Gestalt view of these divisions. In truth, I have yet to sit down and take a good look at how teams outside the NFC North have retooled in the offseason. Normally, I focus heavily on the NFL and little else. This year there have been some great NHL (and some NBA) games to take in. Add the World Cup (yes soccer) and I’m a bit removed this year. Now, I am ready for NFL 2010!

To speak specifically to your math, however, please note that averages can be misleading. That’s why things like player salaries and home values look at median values, logarithmic scale, and other statistical variables. Note that in your averages above the standard deviation is about 10.2 which calls into question the accuracy of the average value. The problem is the sample size is always so small and the numbers are based on a speculation of value relative to the entire NFL, not taking into account the realities of the schedule, the conference strength, and many other variables.

Nonetheless, I like the cut of your jib sir. Use numbers and speculate away, it’s damn fun!

IT'S NOT TOO LATE TO FIRE LOVIE!

by LostInSTL on Jun 26, 2010 7:17 AM CDT up reply actions  

LOL....

I did say the numbers are offered as proof of nothing….but, I disagree that median would provide a more accurate picture of the divisions. In the examples you gave, you’re dealing with a much larger sample size, where taking the average of the middle compensates for the extremes. But in a division of 4 teams, where your gauging the talent of the entire division, the extremes are part of what you’re gauging, and thus become relevant, IMHO.

But that’s neither here nor there. The whole point was to spark a bit more conversation, and it did, so I’m happy :D

in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.

by T-Train on Jun 26, 2010 11:19 AM CDT up reply actions  

I was going to say...

If any division is more balanced than the NFC North, then it’s probably the NFC East. I forgot about the AFC South, though – and I’m a little surprised that the NFC South is also very balanced.

A lot of people where complaining loudly about a writer who had ranked us something like 22nd about a week or 2 ago. It looks like the other rankings are consistently putting us in the low-to-mid 20’s, as well. I’d love to say we’re a top 10 or 15 team, but the realist in me says that a lot of things are going to have to be “right” for us to break into that top 1/2 of the league this year – from the O-line to Jay’s INT’s to Tommy returning to form…

by JimmyMack on Jun 26, 2010 9:22 AM CDT up reply actions  

I’m several days late, but this deserves a rec for DaHamsta’s neverending optimism :-D

"44 years of football history and nothing to show for it. I wish I wasn’t banned at the Norseman.." - tfrabotta
"Fellas, what are they, unblockable? Is that the '85 Bears over there?" - overheard at Giants' '06 training camp
~~~ Check my profile for links for SB20 and America's Game: '85 Bears ~~~

by Spongie on Jun 28, 2010 9:11 PM CDT up reply actions  

Priceless.
The Williams Wall is aging, but running and backpedaling to avoid their suspensions is going to help them an awful lot where conditioning is concerned.

Just read that a homer Minnesota judge is not going to let the NFL speed up the appeals process, so the Williams Wall is probably around for most or all of this year. Link

by oripunk3485 on Jun 24, 2010 5:15 PM CDT reply actions  

It's easy to see why

Four very exciting starting quarterbacks (the nfl diva position, and what other division can match that set? Don’t think AFC North does), a lot of running back and (to lesser extent) receiving talent), and three pretty good defenses — Detroit not so much here, but they make up for it by having top draft picks coming out of their ears.

by puddnhead on Jun 25, 2010 5:08 PM CDT reply actions  

I don't know that 10-6 is really a conservative estimate - it may be a bit of a reach

We have to play Green Bay and Minnesota 4 times – and our schedule doesn’t exactly get easier after that – with games at Dallas, the Giants and Miami. Luckily, we have the Jets, Patriots and Eagles at home.

Hopefully if Cutler throws under 15-20 picks, we’re able to stay healthy and Tommy Harris returns to form again, we can win 10 games.

There’s that word again – “if”.

by JimmyMack on Jun 26, 2010 9:00 AM CDT reply actions  

Bears' schedule is not an easy one.

10-6 would be a very successful year, and might be good enough to win the division.

I always turn to the sports section first. The sports page records people's accomplishments; the front page has nothing but man's failures.
~Earl Warren

by lookingdeadred on Jun 26, 2010 11:00 AM CDT up reply actions  

The Bears schedule of schedule is ranked 14th at 50.39......

so it’s pretty average. But, I looked at the actual schedule to estimate the record. The Bears play Dallas, NE and the Jets (all of which I counted as likely losses), along with Minnesota and GB (which I have the Bears splitting). That accounts for 5 of the 6 losses. After that, I took into account the Giants, Eagles and Dolphins, all of which were fairly tough last season, but all of which are roundly being predicted to decline this year. I feel that, with growing pains an such, we can expect one loss from those three games. The remaining game on the schedule are Carolina, Buffalo, Seattle, Washington and Detroit twice. Not all of those games are push overs, but a decent team should be able to win them all.

So I gave the Bears 6 losses out of that, and scored the rest as wins. Admittedly, this is all speculation, especially considering that a team like Detroit could surprise everyone, or a team like GB could fall flat on their faces. What’s your take on the schedule?

in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.

by T-Train on Jun 26, 2010 11:33 AM CDT up reply actions  

We'll have to see

The schedule is pretty challenging, but obviously not the toughest in the NFL. If Detroit has really caught up to us (as some people seem to think), then we could be in for a rough year. It’s nice if you can count on at least two easy ball games, but that may no longer be the case… The thing that makes the schedule “look” hard is the fact that there aren’t a lot of “easy” games, and we finish up against NE and the Jets and then at MN and GB. So, we’d better make our run early in the season to be in a position to lock down a playoff spot.

It’s hard to predict exactly how much we’ve improved over last year – when our line-backing corps was decimated by injuries. Whether or not Cutler and the receivers really take to Martz’ system is going to be key. Of course, they’re all saying that they “love” the new system, but that’s to be expected. Last year, it seems that we had some blown assignments, especially early in the season. Martz’ offense seems to demand even more precise execution and coordination between QB and receiver…

The O-line should be better, but will it be good enough to give Cutler the time he’s going to need to let the receivers get open down-field? And will we be able to punch the ball into the end-zone when we’re inside the 5-yard line? If think last year, the big story was our horrible execution inside the red-zone… If those questions get answered favorably, this team could easily go all the way. But, there’s a lot of questions that need to be worked out…

by JimmyMack on Jun 26, 2010 12:38 PM CDT up reply actions  

strength of schedule rankings are based on the previous year's records are they not?

Since it is possible (likely I would say) some of these teams will be better than they were last year, Detroit for example, one has to take strength of schedule ranking with a grain of salt. I cannot see the Bears winning more than 11, with 9 or 10 being more likely, and probably enough to win the division.

I always turn to the sports section first. The sports page records people's accomplishments; the front page has nothing but man's failures.
~Earl Warren

by lookingdeadred on Jun 27, 2010 10:00 AM CDT up reply actions  

I completely agree....

I only threw in the SOS because it’s general considered a standard by which to measure, but I’m with you. I have always thought it was a bit (or a lot) lacking. For one, it’s heavily skewed by division games. Of course, the division games are a big part of the season, but I contend that they are also the most unpredictable games on the schedule. As far as the SOS of the teams in our division go, Detroit has the hardest SOS (.508) followed by Chicago and Minnesota (.504) and finally Green Bay (.488). But if you remove division opponents, Minnesota has easily the highest SOS (.556) followed by Green Bay (.519), Chicago (.494) and Detroit has by far the easiest (.438). Now, IMHO, the gap has narrow all around in the NFC North, and so the out-of-division schedule becomes all the more important to the division landscape.

But, I still stand by the 10 win prediction based on the schedule, not the SOS. I don’t believe Detroit has improved enough for it to show up much in this year’s record (but I do expect the improvements to show up in 2011 and beyond), And I did address the changes that differ from SOS, when I stated that NYG, PHI and MIA were tough last year but expected to be on the decline this year.

My opinion mirrors yours almost exactly, my friend. And based on the schedules of Green Bay and Minnesota, I think your prediction that 10 wins could win the division is more accurate than most expect. Not definite by any stretch of the imagination. But probable? I’ll by that.

in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.

by T-Train on Jun 27, 2010 1:45 PM CDT up reply actions  

I don't see Aaron Rogers...

Lasting the entire season unless GB has addressed their line enough to keep him on his feet. He’s not as mobile as Cutler is, and the hits he takes at times are vicious. The Vikings pass rush is going to be just as good, and both the Bears and the Lions have massively upgraded.

Losing C.Taylor is a bigger loss to the Vikings than most people understand, mainly because he was the safety net for AP. When AP got the fumbles they would throw Chester in. When they wanted to give teams a different look, they’d throw Chester in and throw for some 20-25yard gains. They lost a pretty decent facet of their offense, and lost a safety net.

Associate Writer - WindyCityGridiron.com - Artist formerly known as Sklz711

by Jacob Hayes on Jun 26, 2010 12:11 PM CDT reply actions  

Didn't Rogers lead the league in sacks, last year?

He must be incredibly durable, or very fortunate. Either way, those hits have to eventually take their toll…

I guess the Vikings must be pretty high on Gerhart. Did they even attempt to retain Taylor?

by JimmyMack on Jun 26, 2010 12:45 PM CDT up reply actions  

Like Favre before him

GB quarterbacks are pretty tough guys.

I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.

by maxwellsdemon on Jun 27, 2010 11:23 PM CDT up reply actions  

Are you just stuttering or is your real name T-Train ? Well Thomas why don't I give you a more accurate child's view of the D"Norse position .

In your opening you stated the North was considered the strongest . That is not correct son . They claim that Dallas and their conference was the strongest last year . Remember , Dallas was the toughest one-on-one opponent that nobody wanted to face . Eli & Donovan rounded out the field . Oops ! What a year does to the experts huh…. ! ESPN rests on the East Coast ? ESPN must pander to their local fan base as stated by Gonzo over at the DN ! His info will show that no matter who is the best . ESPN will always show allegiance to their coast .
   When MCMillen left Detroit improved . Can they be competitive week to week ? No . Are they a danger . They are not good enough to be backed into a corner so that analogy won’t work . But a wounded lion is still a danger !
      The Cheesers are a weird bunch ! What they thinkare their strengths are their weaknesses and vise versa ? Aaron has the fantasy #‘s and that’s it ? He can’t win the big game . Hell he can’t even win some of the little ones . Brett owns that group and as long as that Purple Dinasaur is around the kittens , cubs and curds aren’t safe ! Your team may just put this moldy franchise in third this year . Of course they will still proclaim they are the best . Dillusional as they get alone up in those woods with their sisters ???
   Your Bears ? Where do we begin ? Good free agents and a great monster to bring back your pass rush ! This like Jared was for us is the biggest piece you could add to your secondary’s success . But I regretably have to say ……You can’t improve by letting go of former starters . You now lack depth and as the IR hits the North come winter you will remember the Wisdom I Doc Goth offer to you today ! Cutler was a good fit . And let me defend my choice ? Aaron tookover a 13-3 team and went 6-10 . Cutler’s wins alone prove my point . Through adversity you still found a way to win . I pissed off a few of my Vike minions at DN by saying your split with us single handedly ended our ability to control ur destiny . They are to scared to challenge me on the point . But don’t get m e wrong . I confidently believe that with Brett the rest of the North are merely speed bumps . Remember though ? Star to fall asleep and cross a speed bump and you could end up in the ditch !!!
   I disagree with Thomas’s wishful thinking about Tarvaris . Just two years ago Tarvaris won the North . Your drought continues . This team has added coaches that have proven wins . We have better draft picks in those 3 years hands down . We even have better proven and unproven free agents in those three years . More wins . More blowouts . Better overll OL & DL production . Age is about the same on both teams . Scary equal with reguard to our defenses . Our biggest weakness is away games on grass and What If Sports gives us a 88% chance to win in Chicago ? We as Vike fans have to once again hope for Bear success . If you knock off a few opponents it could alter Our seeding in the playoffs . We have unarguably the one thing your beloved team doesn’t have ? The ability to compete againt the Elite Eight teams on any given day . With a chance to win in every game .
    Please offer a real opinion ? Not some Packer smart ass ….Huh or some shit ? Or the ole can’t you use complete sentences garbage ? Defend these comments if you can . Skip one thing and I hope embarassment is easyfor you to swallow ? HeeHee

by gothicpurple on Jun 27, 2010 11:42 AM CDT reply actions  

This kind of drivel might pass for informative or even intelligent over at DN, but here, we just call it what it is. Lacking.

Never having been there, all I can say is that we’re pretty blessed at WCG.

"44 years of football history and nothing to show for it. I wish I wasn’t banned at the Norseman.." - tfrabotta
"Fellas, what are they, unblockable? Is that the '85 Bears over there?" - overheard at Giants' '06 training camp
~~~ Check my profile for links for SB20 and America's Game: '85 Bears ~~~

by Spongie on Jun 28, 2010 9:16 PM CDT up reply actions  

hoooooly sh!t

that queen fan got completely and totally dominated. hahhahahahaaha. this is really, really classic. too bad 95 percent of this untermensch’s fellow fans won’t see how badly he just got embarrassed out here.

i mean really, gothicpurple (cute name emokid btw) i am sure you cannot even comprehend the level to which you were just used as toiletpaper. although, perhaps by re-reading these last tidbits you may catch on a bit.

And finally, I find it interesting that someone who opens up a discussion by taunting my name then finishes his post with a challenge not to taunt him about his incredibly poor grammar. OMG, how hilarious is that? Have problems with that complex much, do we? lmao!

Now…….your post has been found dissected and found wanting. This kind of drivel might pass for informative or even intelligent over at DN, but here, we just call it what it is. Lacking. Did I get all that across well enough for you? Or was I stuttering too much?

by reefermadness3 on Jun 29, 2010 8:06 AM CDT up reply actions  

nice

We’re gonna be a pretty violent bunch. ~Lance Briggs

by BearNecessities on Jun 29, 2010 11:32 AM CDT up reply actions  

NO reply .

I see how this is going to start . Gothic one and Da Bears Nation Zero .

by gothicpurple on Jun 27, 2010 4:12 PM CDT reply actions  

It's coming, hero. Gimme a few more minutes........

in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.

by T-Train on Jun 27, 2010 4:19 PM CDT up reply actions  

What, No Reply?

I see how this is going to end……… Da Bears Nation: 1 Gothic: 0

in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.

by T-Train on Jun 27, 2010 7:55 PM CDT up reply actions  

Don't feed the trolls

In the 8th grade Mike Ditka won his school's Science Fair with a model of a working volcano. There were 17 other working volcano's made that day, but only one named Mount Ditka.

by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Jun 28, 2010 9:59 AM CDT up reply actions  

You're right, I'm wrong, I'm sorry...........

This should do it, lol……

in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.

by T-Train on Jun 28, 2010 2:49 PM CDT up reply actions  

+1!!!!!

in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.

by T-Train on Jun 29, 2010 1:10 AM CDT up reply actions  

Dey not too smart when it comes to da arithmetic...

"He is remarkably bright", a "terrific talent", the sky is the limit for Cutler"

-Mike Martz-

by tfrabotta on Jul 1, 2010 9:27 PM CDT up reply actions  

I really think Green Bay will still be in the top 2

The other spot will be a battle between us and the Vikings, I could see us winning that, but should Favre come back, it would be tougher. No matter what happens, I still think the NFC East is still the toughest division in the NFL.

I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.

by maxwellsdemon on Jun 27, 2010 11:25 PM CDT reply actions  

2 of the top 5

GB and Minnesota are arguably 2 of the top 5 teams in the NFL. So, yes the NFC North really is that tough.

Detroit is on the rise, but will still have a terrible record this year (look at their record & tell me how many games you see them winning).

We (Da Bears) are perhaps the biggest wildcard in the entire league. We could be pretty good, or we could really suck. I predict 9-7 for us this year. Though, I think we’ll need to pull off 10 wins to get into the playoffs.

by MakeHalasProud on Jun 29, 2010 1:28 PM CDT reply actions  

All good points....

in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.

by T-Train on Jun 29, 2010 1:42 PM CDT up reply actions  

10 wins is a good number...

Considering the Falcons, Giants, Eagles, and the Bears will all likely be fighting for one wild card spot as GB or the Vikes will probably take the other WC spot.

But who knows? If Cutler and his receivers click, and a healthy Harris and Urlacher, not to mention Peppers, generate a solid pass rush the Bears could give GB and the Vikes a run for their money. Especially if Favre does not come back, or gets injured.

Then it would be us Vikes and the Bears fighting over the same spot likely.

It’s all gonna come down to divisional games, which is why I am very excited about the upcoming season.

by Bjorno on Jun 29, 2010 7:46 PM CDT up reply actions  

GB is the favorite now

since the status of Favre is uncertain, Minny’s future is uncertain, too. If TJackson is their QB, they will struggle to be a .500 team and the Bears may surpass them. However, even if that happens, will the Bears win enough games to make the playoffs? There is a good chance the answer is no.

I always turn to the sports section first. The sports page records people's accomplishments; the front page has nothing but man's failures.
~Earl Warren

by lookingdeadred on Jun 30, 2010 8:35 AM CDT up reply actions  

Uncertain?

Where have you been?

Besides, do you REALLY think Tjack makes the Vikes a .500 team? We did win the division without Favre, Rice(injured) and Harvin in 2008.

The only reason we would get close to .500 is the fact that the NFC is that much stronger.

by Bjorno on Jul 7, 2010 2:25 PM CDT up reply actions  

And without TJack, remember?

Tarvaris was all of 2-3 as a starter in ’08. Gus Ferotte was 8-3. And TJack then captained the playoff loss, as well.

in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.

by T-Train on Jul 8, 2010 11:34 AM CDT up reply actions  

Exactly.

Thanks for proving my point.

We were 8-3 with a Quarterback who was marginally better than Tjack in passing. Add in Tjacks rushing stats, and they are pretty much equal with an edge to Tjack.

59.1% completion, 12TD to 15INT and a rating of 73.7 in ’08 for Frerrote with Bernard Berrian and Bobby Wade.

58.2% 9TD 12INT and a rating of 70.8 in ’07 with Troy Williamson and Bobby Wade as #1 and #2 receivers. Add in the 260 yards rushing and 3 TDs and Tjack outperformed Frerotte by a small margin.

Here are some Troy Williamson highlights in case you haven’t seen much of him:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=81gpKrIicjU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-HyEemjm_7E
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9WZNyYouzuk

Those make me laugh now… But I almost cried back then.

The playoff loss was a bad game for Tjack, though he did not have any help from the coaching staff in the way of protection. The Eagles blitzed constantly, and we never schemed to slow the blitz. No screens, no tosses, nothing to slow the pressure. No excuses, but he is better than that game shows.

Anyhow… My point is that the team has enough talent on both sides of the ball to get away with a guy under center who can throw for ~200 yards, 1 TD and a few key 3rd down runs. I know Tjack is capable of that exact thing.

He has improved every year he has been in the league, and the team he has now is better than it has been in 10 years. Is it so crazy to believe in the guy?

I am not saying he will be a top-10 QB any time soon, what I am saying is that he is good enough for the team to make a run at a wild card spot.

by Bjorno on Jul 9, 2010 3:19 PM CDT up reply actions  

We'll see....

I think you’re fooling yourself, given TJack’s history and the decline of your pass defense. I have a hard time picking Minnesota to win with Favre. Without him, well. You have your opinion, and I have mine.

And, no. I don’t blame you for believing in the guy. But reverse the question. Can you blame me for not believing in him? I’ll be honest. If I worshiped Purple instead of Blue and Orange, I’d be trying to believe in him too. But if he were a Bear, would you believe in him? Honestly?

He could end up being a good QB, but he just as easily could end up being Andre Ware without the expectations.

in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.

by T-Train on Jul 9, 2010 11:20 PM CDT up reply actions  

Besides the age of Winfield...

I am actually expecting an improvement in the way of pass defense.

The injury to Griffin may be a blessing in disguise, without it I don’t think Asher Allen or Chris Cook would get very much playing time this year.

If we can keep the pressure on, and shore up our safety issues, I think we will be better than the last 4 years. Especially considering we were 26th in the league in opposing QB rating last year.

Karl Paymah? Who the hell let that guy start for us?

On to Tjack:

As far as seeing it from an outside perspective, assuming I haven’t followed him from the get-go, or knew anything about the circumstances surrounding his playing and benching in 2008, and simply looked at what I saw during Bears games and the occasional replay on ESPN; I would not believe in him.

I can certainly see it from your perspective, and I agree that he could easily end up being a terrible QB. How it ends all depends on him.

But what I do see is a guy who was mishandled ala David Carr.

Coming out of a Div I-AA school, the adjustment to the NFL is much steeper than say Vanderbilt or Cal. Given that he was drafted as a 3-4 year project, he never should have seen the field before the 2009 season. But at the end of 2006, Brad Johnson just was not cutting it and Brooks Bollinger couldn’t even catch a snap so Childress opted to go with the Rookie Tjack from then on.

Then, instead of making the smart move of signing a QB who could actually play, Childress decided to sign Kelly Holcomb as a backup and stick with Tjack.

Still not ready for the NFL, he put up a mediocre season in 2007 which is what you would expect from a guy who wasn’t ready.

In 2008, things were looking up and Tjack was looking very good in the off-season and the preseason (I know… it’s the off-season and preseason) but at the beginning of the regular season his 15 month old son had to have a pacemaker installed, which got infected and had to be removed and reinstalled. Childress, seeing that his off-the-field issues affected his play, benched him in favor of Gus Frerotte who “appeared” to do better. In reality, it was Adrian Peterson and the defense who won most of those games for Frerotte.

Besides, the two games Tjack lost were @ the Packers and against the Colts. Both were top-10 pass defenses that year.

In relief of Frerotte, Tjack put up some good numbers against some mediocre Pass Ds in the Lions, Falcons, Cardinals and Giants(who rested some starters in the 2nd half) with 64% completion and 8 TDs 1INT.

Now, it is tough to take those four games as a microcosm of his actual ability, but it does show he has been improving steadily.

Here are the things I know about Tjack: He puts in the work and the film study that is required of a good QB. He is improving at looking-off defenders and does a good job with shoulder fakes. He has the arm strength and accuracy to put the ball where it needs to be. He can move well to avoid the rush, and when opportunity presents itself he can rush for a large chunk of yardage.

But what I don’t know is whether or not he has the confidence and the football IQ to read defenses and see where the openings are. Those are two things you cannot be a successful QB without, but they things that can be learned.

Right now I am happy to have him as a backup because sitting behind ol’ man Favre is teaching him what to do, and more importantly, what NOT to do.

by Bjorno on Jul 10, 2010 2:42 AM CDT up reply actions  

TJack.....

I would take TJack as a backup in a heartbeat, as you noted above. I also completely agree with the way you described his mishandling. It was unacceptable. But I also thought he was a reach in the second round. The Vikes were panned by a lot of the media for trading away both third round picks to reach in the second on Tarvaris.

That being said, Tom Brady was a sixth round pick. TJ has a great arm, and he has shown improvement, IMHO reading defenses. Playing behind Favre can only help that. What he hasn’t shown is the ability to hang with the big boys and perform well against the above average defenses. In the North, that makes it very difficult to succeed (See Rex Grossman). His mechanics, which were under fire leading up to the draft, and his footwork are still in need of work.

But the biggest problem I see with Tarvaris is confidence, which you already eluded to. His ego was hurt from the start by being forced into starting too early. Then, he get’s benched for Gus Frerotte, which was the right move, but the media made it more about what Jackson couldn’t do then about letting a project QB develop, and that had to hurt his confidence a bit, as well. Then the Vikes bend over and smile without a reach around for Brett Favre. Don’t get me wrong. Favre is definitely the best chance the Vikes have of success. He’s a true great. But they handled him, and are continuing to handle him like he’s above the league. Again, that may be all well and good while Favre is here, and TJ is even saying the right things in the media. But these players are still real people. Favre is being treated like a god, and the team only offered Tarvaris a third round tender. Third Round! For the guy that some think is the heir to Favre? And nobody in the league jumped on a third round pick for a QB that Minnesota is saying is their guy if Fave doesn’t comeback? (This, BTW, is why I KNOW Favre is coming back. Would Minnesota have gambled on tendering Jackson for a third round pick if they thought that Favre might not show up? I doubt it, seriously. If everything went wrong, i.e. Favre decides to spend September mowing and some other team sees Jackson as as worth a third round pick, then the best QB left on the roster is Sage Rosenfels.) who would take that chance? If they really thought Favre would leave, TJ would have gotten a better tender…..IMHO)

There’s a right way and a wrong way to handle that situation. Green Bay handled it the right way. Minnesota is handling it the wrong way. The Pack showed confidence in Aaron Rodgers. IMO, the Vikes have not shown confidence in Tarvaris, but instead have shown the exact opposite, whether justifiable or not. If Tarvaris is truly the QB of Minnesota’s future, You couldn’t tell by looking at the franchises actions. They’re acting more like he’s a valued but positioned and solidified backup. I cannot see how that helps his confidence, either……

I think, honestly, that if TJack

in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.

by T-Train on Jul 10, 2010 12:07 PM CDT up reply actions  

Confidence is the key.

If you don’t KNOW that you can make the throw, then how can you make the key throws in crucial situations?

Confidence is easily shattered, but it can also be rebuilt. I think he knows that he was in a bad situation to begin with and was not ready to play when he went out there. That might be his only saving grace, that he knows the odds were heavily stacked against him.

As far as his ego goes, what I see is a guy who doesn’t get rattled easily. He seems to have a quiet confidence, even when he is benched for Gus “Hey I am gonna give myself a concussion” Frerotte.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MdWK-aam0Jo

I would like to see more fire out of him, but it is important to keep an even keel.

He handled the Favre aquisition as well as he possibly could. He had a really good quote the likes of “C’mon, how can I get mad? It’s Brett Favre.” I can’t find the exact quote because there is literally 1,480,234,567 articles with the terms “Tarvaris Jackson” and “Brett Favre”.

If I were him, I would be a bit miffed to begin with but would not be too upset. I am still getting paid, I still have a legitimate chance of taking over in a year or two and I can learn a lot from a HOF QB.

As far as his RFA tender goes, it was an “original round” tender, not a 3rd round tender. Though I am still a little confused as to the difference. Though you are right that it does not make the team seem confident in his abilities.

My main problem with the whole thing is my conflicting feelings on the matter. TJack was “Chilly’s” guy. Childress lobbied to sign him earlier than originally expected, and it turned out to be a good idea because there were two teams who were apparanly going to choose him in the high 3rd round, one being the Bears if I am not mistaken.

Now, I know that our DPP Rick Spielman is a very good talent evaluator, I also know that Brad Childress is kind of an idiot.

I mean, he is a good “thinker” guy. If he is given the time to make a decision, he usually makes the correct one. But if the pressure is on, he just does not have the head to handle it. Case in point: 12 men on the field and putting Brett Favre in a situation where he is able to throw the ball on that interception in the NFC Championship.

Favre is a gunslinger, if he thinks he can do something he will. You know he will force balls into tight spots and throw across his body in certain situations. Why put him in a position where he can even throw the ball?

But I digress.

I am torn between my knowledge of Chilly and my experience with Tjack.

Considering the performance of a QB is dependant upon the quality of the receivers and vice versa, I know Tjack is better than his previous numbers have shown. Though I am not comfortable having him as our only option once Favre retires.

Unfortunately, there were no solid prospects in the draft that we could even aim for.

by Bjorno on Jul 10, 2010 2:21 PM CDT up reply actions  

Wow.....

Nice response.

I can’t say I disagree with anything you said there.

I somehow cut the end off of my previous reply. It was meant to say……

I think, honestly, that if TJack is handled properly, he has a shot. I just don’t think he’s been handled properly. That’s no fault of TJ’s. He seems like a great kid. But if I were the GM, I would have either worked out a deal for an extrention, work stoppage looming or not, or I would have tagged him with a first round tender. If I have as much confidence as they claim, then I back it up. If i don’t, then I don’t say one thing and then drop a pittance of a tender in his lap. I think the Vikes are screwing this up. Either back the kid or don’t, but confusing him as to his worth is ridiculous, unnecessary and unfair to the player. I’m not saying ignore Favre. I’m saying that you commit to TJ, too.

And I completely agree with the argument about the QBs. I don’t believe there was an honest first round draft pick in the 2010 draft. Too many questions about each. And I wasn’t sold on any of the guys behind the first round draftees, including Lafevour, who the Bears grabbed up at a supposed bargain 6th round price (but I also don’t blame them for taking a guy that half the media thought was a bargain pick). In all honestly, though, I would have dumped Rosenfels and taken a stab at someone with a better history, like Mark Bulger, for example, or even Rex Grossman, who was crucified by the Chicago media, and the media in general, but might do well if given a shot somewhere new, and would definitely provide a backup with championship experience. Of course both of these guys are a gamble, as well, but I’d feel safer with Bulger or Grossman backing up Jackson if Favre decides that the tractor’s call is to great (and who could blame him, really) then with Rosenfels in the wings. But that’s just me.

in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.

by T-Train on Jul 10, 2010 8:43 PM CDT up reply actions  

I would be happy with Grossman as a backup

Though Rosenfels put up better numbers than Grossman ever has.

But, his numbers were likely inflated as he was throwing to Andre Johnson and Owen Daniels. Those guys can make any QB look good.

I really attribute much of the mis-handling to the fact that Chilly fancies himself the next Belichek. He thinks he is being clever, just like a kid playing Madden who thinks it is clever to go for it on fourth down on your own 7.

One good sign is how the team rallied around Tjack when Favre first arrived. Many felt Tjack was their best option at QB, and if we had lost the game vs the 49ers as opposed to Favre pulling a golden lightening bolt out of his ass in the final seconds, the season would have been much different.

That play instantly changed the locker room morale.

Drat. Now I lost track of the point I was making, and it is almost impossible to scroll up through the text field on my phone.

I’ll continue this tomorrow, I worked too late tonight.

by Bjorno on Jul 11, 2010 2:16 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

I suspect most Bear fans would love to see Grossman in Minny, too

I always turn to the sports section first. The sports page records people's accomplishments; the front page has nothing but man's failures.
~Earl Warren

by lookingdeadred on Jul 11, 2010 10:01 AM CDT up reply actions  

Heh...

You are probably right, then they would be very disappointed to see that he has improved since being run out of Chi-town.

I do think Lefevour was a steal in the 6th, though I have not seen enough of him to know exactly how he will turn out.

At the very least he is a long-term backup solution to Cutler.

by Bjorno on Jul 11, 2010 11:09 AM CDT up reply actions  

Everything they said about Bear fans at DN and Achme isn't true .

I see some people stop . Then try to hold an opinion . Thanks for that and let’s begin .
First I refuse to use god grammer . Get use to it .The more I misspell the more accurate I become .You mentioned who had a better off season .We brought back about 10 Probowlers and got thru OTA’s completely healthy . Can you say that . Oops ! So much for domination Reffer ! You went out in free agency and found an excellant DE . Hot and cold like Jared .Not to skip to the bottom of your defense but….Thomas was the best free agent . Just not available to the team that dumped on him . Best blocking back ? Nobody wanted him . He was passed over by everyone . We’ll talk Martz later .
     Brett and three playoff losses . Who was the last Bear’s QB to play in 3 playoff games . 85’ would be a logical guess. Any others ? I doubt .Weak arguement to referrenceBrett don’t ya think ?
     Let me play your game on this one . Cook/Lito and Wright/retread . We target our DB’s by going after a high 2nd rder and a vet . Who by the wayis excellerating on the PR team . You get a mid 3rd and a guy who couldn’t make your own 53 a few years back . And your point is ? On this area alone we made much greater improvements . Wouldn’t you say ? What was Wright’s rating since you started with the facts . Ya . Thought so .
   Lewis was the year before . A resign , Marko Mitchell was brought in to test that signing . Do you really want to critisize WR’s . When we got Berrian he was a solid #2 forced to play #1 . Hester could be a probowl slot . You haven’t got a #1 . Get one and then talk to me about WR’s .
   We’ll talk Martz now . He brings in his own loyal groupies . He throws out talent . Oleson ring a bell ! He will devistate your future . Word out is that Cutler and the coach are already at odds . $00 yard passing losses are still losses . The schedule is filled with great run defense teams . One dimensional Cutler won’t have a chance . That’s not a knock on Cutler . He will thrive after a rebuildng process . Caused by his pricetag .
    Wow !!! You really want to talk OL ??? DeGeare wasn’t a pick I wanted . We have five starters though . You mentioned playing two backups and calling that an improvement . How ?? Williams natural position so far has been the bench . I’ll give you credit . You pegged Orlando Pace so I wouldn’t have too . But no free pass . This team plugs holes with idiots sometimes . Kruetz , that’s old . Who even relieves him . The Williams’ only taunt one guy every year and he is the one .I’d go on but even Doc Goth can’t stop the bleeding on your line .
   If ? Williams wall ? You don’t read much on their case obviously . State court gave them the right to sue the NFL later . NFL was approved then un approved to suspend . NFL was turned dwn by Supreme to appeal . Late Octto mid November before the NFL can reapply . They are trying to protect an illegal contract formed with the Union . If isn’t the question .
   Your greatest chance to beat the Vikes was in the snow . Darn , Goodell prevented any Vike matchups in the snow this year .After Thanksgiving the Division willall be laid out .
   Remember , I don’t discredit GB . Brett just has their # . That happens . I like the Jets . But will they realistically get by Indy ?You failed to mention Tarvaris the following year . His over 500% record . And a win in GB . McNabb was bitter not to be considered by Chicao publicly IMO . Fuel enough to consider Brett in three years . Rumors . Strong ones show Brett working on a two year deal after 2010 . How mny 4000+ QB’s play for 12 Million or less ?
   Coachs ?? Every analyst said last year that too many new coaches will destroy the Bears . Lovie should stay unless Fisher from TEN comes a callin’ .
    In conclusion . A team with two possible openings (WLB,FS) can afford to develope from within and draft wisely . Your team ended the year with 8 to 10 openings and filled 2 or 3 . This team is in rebuilding mode . The North opponents always pose a threat . But if the tables were turned you would probably be a lot more cocky than this Vike fan . Brett brings a kind of cnfidence to the team and it’s fans that hasn’t been here in years . I say with confidence . At the half time of our first match up you will agree . 2011 isn’t that far away for you to start dreaming about ???? Focus on up ending the Pack . Then , which one are your new FA’s going to let you surpass ?? DAL , PHIL , NYG . You play two away . You may have had a better chance in the Division with our grass schedule .
  One last bit too chew on Everson Griffen Vs. Wooten in 2010 . Who was rated higher . Which ran a 4.59 at 263 lbs. ? Who benched more ? Which had major surgery ? Even though you drafted about 15 spos ahead of us ? How can you even compare the quality of our guys ? You came into this gunfight without ammunition . Peppers is a temporary fix to bail out your DB’s . What did you have to lose to get him? This years schedule is slightly tougher . You don’t matchup well . We’ll get into that later .
   ………..It’s good to see someone isn’t aftraid to have a view . But we are too stacked for you to defend yourself onthis one .
Doctor Gothic will be back to surgically remove all doubts and hopes of over taking this Purple Dinasaur and his Barbarian Hordes from the North ! Stop over at DN if you have real opinions . Thanks Again my Anti-Packer comrades ………

by gothicpurple on Jun 30, 2010 12:29 AM CDT reply actions  

go be green...

In the 8th grade Mike Ditka won his school's Science Fair with a model of a working volcano. There were 17 other working volcano's made that day, but only one named Mount Ditka.

by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Jun 30, 2010 12:24 PM CDT up reply actions  

fly

with your greenness.

by DaHamsta on Jun 30, 2010 1:23 PM CDT up reply actions  

Nice. I skipped over the failure of English comment without even needing to see who wrote it and found this pleasant shade of green summarising its general inanity, without having to subject my eyes to such painful mangling of the Bard’s tongue. For that, sir, another rec.

"44 years of football history and nothing to show for it. I wish I wasn’t banned at the Norseman.." - tfrabotta
"Fellas, what are they, unblockable? Is that the '85 Bears over there?" - overheard at Giants' '06 training camp
~~~ Check my profile for links for SB20 and America's Game: '85 Bears ~~~

by Spongie on Jun 30, 2010 7:34 PM CDT up reply actions  

EPIC

If you can't laugh at yourself you must not be very funny.
I remain a pessimistically hopeful Bears fan.

by Just Dave on Jul 2, 2010 9:43 PM CDT up reply actions  

If you can't use good grammar then at least proof read before you post.
First I refuse to use god grammer .

That’s a simple one to catch. It’s called “effort”. Use some. Not being a “grammar NAZI” just using good old fashioned common sense.

If you can't laugh at yourself you must not be very funny.
I remain a pessimistically hopeful Bears fan.

by Just Dave on Jul 2, 2010 9:46 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yes, yes!

Go home to your land of purple sails, where your brethren might understand the words that are coming out of your mouth! Maybe in time your brethren will teach you the secrets of literature, writing, and all the joys and knowledge that those can unlock!

Until then, however, I can only assume that you will be left in your own little world, where if it is not purple, it is not good. Please, pray tell, return to our shores when you are able to speak as a cultured being of the world, as opposed to like a bar-hopping man in a horn helmet. Begone, foul purple pest, lost from his infernal homeland of the Daily Norseman!

by SJS_illini on Jun 30, 2010 9:12 PM CDT up reply actions  

See above.......and yes, the beatings will continue until moral improves.

in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.

by T-Train on Jul 1, 2010 3:42 AM CDT up reply actions  

How did the 98 playoffs work out for you guys???

Gary Anderson anyone?????

"He is remarkably bright", a "terrific talent", the sky is the limit for Cutler"

-Mike Martz-

by tfrabotta on Jul 1, 2010 9:37 PM CDT up reply actions  

And?

How did your 1998 season go?

4-12…

I would rather make it to the NFC championship and lose on a fluke than go 4-12.

Heck, we haven’t had a season that bad since the early ’80s.

by Bjorno on Jul 7, 2010 2:35 PM CDT up reply actions  

Fair enough.....

but if you want to be fair then you should also note that you haven’t won even a conference championship since the national bicentennial, so what did your record matter?

in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.

by T-Train on Jul 8, 2010 11:43 AM CDT up reply actions  

Noted.

I would rather be in the hunt than hanging out back at the lodge watching TV.

by Bjorno on Jul 10, 2010 1:41 PM CDT up reply actions  

My point.....

wasn’t to be snarky. It was to make note that, while you had a fine season, who will remember? Just like who will remember Chicago’s 2001 or 2005 season? They will barely remember our ‘06 Super Bowl run anywhere outside of Chicago soon, because we lost. So what did it matter? Cool, you went 15-1 that year. And what does Randall Cunningham (since I’m bringing him up, let me say that my prayers and sympathies are with him and his family) have to show for it? Nothing more than Kramer, Stenstrom or Moreno have to show for the 4-12 season the Bears put up.

My point is, that for all of the great seasons the vikings have had, and for all of the consistency they’ve shown…….how many rings? How many Championships? The last time the Vikings won a league championship was 1969, and they lost in the AFL/NFL World Championship Game to the Chiefs. So they have never won the overall championship. Period.

So i guess my answer to that would be that I’d rather be a bit less consistent and win 9 overall titles than be extremely consistent and win none, brother.

in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.

by T-Train on Jul 10, 2010 9:02 PM CDT up reply actions  

don't forget about

the fun part of going 4-12 or worse; waiting for the high draft picks that one can build false hope around next season (except the last two seasons for us of course).

da team should have done better than crapping out vs. carolina in 05. that defense was awesome.

by reefermadness3 on Jul 10, 2010 10:57 PM CDT up reply actions  

Agreed.........

But Steve Smith was Kryptonite………….

in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.

by T-Train on Jul 10, 2010 11:04 PM CDT up reply actions  

High draft picks are nice...

But I think I prefer the 15th-25th range in draft picks. They seem to have a higher success rate than the top-15, but I have no evidence to back that up.

by Bjorno on Jul 12, 2010 12:20 PM CDT up reply actions  

If you are going to count the 8 championships before the AFL-NFL merger...

Then you have to acknowledge our NFL championship in 1969 as well.

But I get your point.

by Bjorno on Jul 12, 2010 12:22 PM CDT up reply actions  

I did acknowledge the 1969 Championship.....

(Now you went and made me quote myself, lol)

The last time the Vikings won a league championship was 1969, and they lost in the AFL/NFL World Championship Game to the Chiefs. So they have never won the overall championship. Period.

But that wasn’t the final game of the ’69 season, either. The Minnesota Vikings played their final game in the AFL/NFL World Championship (otherwise known as…….?) against the Kansas City Chiefs and lost. So, while technically the NFL Champions, they still lost the game to determine the World Champion. You know, Super Bowl IV? Remember that 4 Super Bowls happened before the merger (1966 to 1969).

It’s an easy one to miss, because the league is kinda confusing about those 4 years. Kansas City, Oakland, Baltimore are all listed as having an additional championship, even though they were the first four Super Bowl losers. But then, Dallas doesn’t get a championship for losing Super Bowl 5, nor has any Super Bowl loser since, to the Vikings, who went on to lose three more Super Bowls over the next 7 years and are credited with no additional championships . So, those “championships” from ‘66-’69 for the Super Bowl losers seem kind of hollow do they not? They should all four come with an asterisks, at the very least, shouldn’t they?

in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.

by T-Train on Jul 12, 2010 1:49 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

Ahh... I must have just glanced over that part when I saw this below:
So i guess my answer to that would be that I’d rather be a bit less consistent and win 9 overall titles than be extremely consistent and win none, brother.

And had a knee-jerk reaction.

Since they did not win the WORLD championship, which is what eventually became the Super Bowl, then yes they should come with asterisks. As much as I hate to agree… I do.

Wanna know something really odd? Between the time I posted my last comment and now, somebody edited the Wikipedia entry for the Minnesota Vikings. They changed the “0” League Championships with an asterisks to “1” league championship.

by Bjorno on Jul 12, 2010 4:27 PM CDT up reply actions  

lol......

We’re making an impact, lol!

in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.

by T-Train on Jul 12, 2010 4:32 PM CDT up reply actions  

And spongie...

49 years of football history and NOTHING to show for it!!! Brings a smile to my face every time training camp starts! SKOL!

"He is remarkably bright", a "terrific talent", the sky is the limit for Cutler"

-Mike Martz-

by tfrabotta on Jul 1, 2010 9:39 PM CDT reply actions  

:-D

"44 years of football history and nothing to show for it. I wish I wasn’t banned at the Norseman.." - tfrabotta
"Fellas, what are they, unblockable? Is that the '85 Bears over there?" - overheard at Giants' '06 training camp
~~~ Check my profile for links for SB20 and America's Game: '85 Bears ~~~

by Spongie on Jul 3, 2010 11:52 AM CDT up reply actions  

Too much "editing" here.

I really liked my Favre comment…..

If you can't laugh at yourself you must not be very funny.
I remain a pessimistically hopeful Bears fan.

by Just Dave on Jul 7, 2010 9:23 PM CDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Windy City Gridiron is the best independent site on the internet for breaking news, in-depth analysis, and hardcore discussion about the Chicago Bears

Community Guidelines
Start posting about the Bears »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

SPONSORS

SBNation.com Recent Stories

Photo +3 updates

Vikings Vs. Saints: Week 1 Opens With NFC Championship Rematch On Thursday Night

EAST RUTHERFORD NJ - AUGUST 27:  Antonio Cromartie #31 of the New York Jets is introduced before the game against the Washington Redskins  during their preseason game on August 27 2010 at the New Meadowlands Stadium  in East Rutherford New Jersey.  (Photo by Al Bello/Getty Images)

NFL Season Preview: Football, Why Do We Love You So?

Dallas Cowboys wide receiver Miles Austin (19) reacts after scoring on a 59-yard touchdown reception in the first half of an NFL football game against the Atlanta Falcons, Sunday, Oct. 25, 2009, in Arlington, Texas. Austin had two touchdowns in the 37-21 Cowboys win. (AP Photo/LM Otero)

Cowboys WR Miles Austin Agrees To Six-Year, $57 Million Extension

More from SBNation.com >


Managers

Windycity_small Adam T

Photo_small Dane Noble

Editors

19554_711053815498_20723723_41499369_7695586_n_small HoneyBear

22636_276583252155_506182155_3148787_7229724_s_small Kev H

Contributing Writers

Extrusion_profile_new_medium_small Mike Mueller

Tn48-1_small Just Dave

Bears_small Jacob Hayes

Attachment30_small Lester A. Wiltfong Jr.

3961055499_e489f15bb2_o_small David Taylor

Cna-building_small NiqueBears

Chicago-bears-logo_small Mark Saade