Looking for the Bright Side of the Chicago Bears: Pre-Season Game 1
It's time at last. It's time at last. Thank Ditka and Halas it's preseason time at last. We've waited, we've prognosticated, we've pumped up players that might not even make the roster, and we've downplayed guys that may end up being diamonds in the rough. All statements about players could and might generally end as soon as those cleats hit the live field; and while the first game of the preseason is too soon for doomsaying, it's certainly not too soon for rays of beautiful orange and blue sunshine.
There were plenty of things to be worried about coming into the first game, and just as much to be excited about as well. Both statements are still true, but hilariously, most of what the national outlets wanted to worry about and focus on ended up being non-factors. On the flip side of that coin, the vast majority of what the fans wanted to focus on ended up being front and center. Let's stay as excited as we were before this game about the rest of the season, and I'll do my best below the fold to give you some reasons why that excitement should be overflowing after what some deemed an underwhelming performance.
1. The second play from scrimmage of the game...
I know what you're thinking, or more like what you weren't thinking. It's extremely tough to remember the minutia of a game a few days out, but with the magic of replays you can go back and see something very similar to what I saw then and now. First things first, yes Harris and Adams were doing nothing on this play. A shame to be sure, but what was fantastic to see was the immense amount of pressure coming from Peppers on the left side, and a surprising amount of effort from Anderson on the right as well. Anderson gets driven to the ground about a yard from the QB, Peppers is absolutely dominating whoever they have at LT. An already designed quick pass is forced off even faster than normal, the LT is driven into the QB and that slight bit of extra pressure is enough to get an errant throw that was a bit more focused away from being a pick six.
2. The blocking was nowhere near as bad as I'd feared.
It sounds strange to say, but the blocking from the first team offensive line was nowhere near as bad as I had thought when watching the game live. The sack on the first series was an absolutely abysmal block by Forte, but if someone is blocking abysmally I'd rather it be a normally good blocking running back than someone we're going to be relying on to protect our franchise quarterback. The pressure on the next play that ended the series was also somewhat of a concern on my first viewing, but on a second look it was the rookie Lance Louis showing growing pains by losing control of his guy and Olson just getting absolutely surprised and then waylaid. Again, not something you love to see, but we all knew that Louis was going to have a lot of growing pains being a rookie conversion product in a non-gelled line, and Olsen is Olsen. His blocking technique has improved, but at the end of the day blocking just is never the foremost thought on his mind.
So there were faults, but there were less of them than I was thinking we'd see, and quite a few were by non-linesmen. There were good things to be found on the line as well. Kreutz was without a doubt moving a lot better than last year. In fact, I'd like to call attention to the outside running play from the first series. Not only does Kreutz get out to block, but Omiyale pancakes the lightning bolt off of some Charger on the play, and had Kreutz squared up just a bit more Forte would have had an easy eight or nine yard gain. I'd love to see the line gel a lot faster, and I'd love to see the line get a lot more push on the inside runs, but it already looks better than last year.
3. Major Wright looks to have been a very good pick.
I'm not going to call for him to immediately be named a starter, but he really did make the case for the Bears making the right call by drafting him. He was all over the field, and was taking great paths to the ball the whole time he was in the game. Incredibly sound tackling one on one to top it all off, I would love to see him taking over at FS and moving Chris Harris up to SS at some point this year without a doubt, but it remains to be seen if he'll be able to get enough reps before the season starts.
4. D.J Moore has finally got the right mindset for an NFL player.
D.J. actually looked pretty good in the game, but above all else he seems to have finally adopted a bit more of a hard-nosed approach to the game and the way he plays it. You could tell he had a lot more fire in the playing time he received, and was looking to prove he belonged on the field. While Moore is going to find it extremely difficult to break the starting lineup as anything more than a nickel right now, his continued improvement will give the Bears an immense amount of depth amongst the defensive backs.
5. The Wide Receivers made the case that many of us thought they would.
The moves Johnny Knox put on the Chargers defense were fantastic, and the only thing better than the moves were the way he was coming down with the ball like he had velcro on his hands. The fantastic leaping catch that really showed of his athleticism on the second throw proved to me that he is definitely the wide receiver of the present and future for the Chicago Bears. Devin Aromashodu definitely continued where he left off, even taking into account that he was playing against the second string defense at times, he looked extremely fluid and is going to put up some great numbers this year. Even the Droppapotamus rose from the ashes to put up a solid effort, and generally gave me warm fuzzies about our entire receiving group. I can barely wait to see Earl Bennett back on the field and working the middle as well, or a bit more usage of the tight ends like we've seen in camp.
---
So what about you? What did you see in the game that filled your sails until next week? Who did I leave out that really made a good impression on you during the game?
56 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Thanks for the review
I agree the offensive line wasn’t nearly as bad as I was hoping, but I am a bit worried about or defense, which never seemed to show up for the game. Week 1 of the pre-season, so there’s still some time for them to get everything together.
I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.
Definitely...
Lots of the miscues on defense IMO were mostly coverage related.
Associate Writer - WindyCityGridiron.com - Artist formerly known as Sklz711
Sorry but I must humbly disagree.
We had no pass rush. No defensive player so much as laid a hand on the quarterback. Maybe that’s vanilla scheming or not having a game plan but our pass rush stayed on Lovie’s bus.
If you can't laugh at yourself you must not be very funny.
I remain a pessimistically hopeful Bears fan.
No it just seemed there was no pass rush .....
…. due to the Chargers quick passing game . Tommie got a good push up the middle and Peppers was killin dude across from him . The real issue was our corners playing so far off the line of scrimmage and allowing the quick pass .
" Everyone has a plan 'till they get punched in the mouth. " ~
Mike Tyson
by MidWayMonster54 on Aug 17, 2010 8:05 PM CDT up reply actions
You bring up good points but
No defensive player so much as laid a hand on the quarterback.
I don’t care what they were doing. This is unacceptable.
If you can't laugh at yourself you must not be very funny.
I remain a pessimistically hopeful Bears fan.
I don't know what to tell you...
Peppers was able to shove the LT into the QB on a six yard route designed to get the ball out quick. It’s hard to get much more pressure than that short of a man going free.
If you want to have a problem with the line, it should definitely be the lackluster tackling and all around poor run stopping. The QB rarely had time, but the backs seemed to always be getting into the second level.
Associate Writer - WindyCityGridiron.com - Artist formerly known as Sklz711
by Jacob Hayes on Aug 18, 2010 12:49 AM CDT up reply actions
Plus that shows that Lovie once again refuses to change his schemes to fit the situation.
We got burned all year last year with quick slants. Good to know we’re in for more of the same.
If you can't laugh at yourself you must not be very funny.
I remain a pessimistically hopeful Bears fan.
Sorry.
Not to beat a dead horse but that TD wasn’t a quick pass.
If you can't laugh at yourself you must not be very funny.
I remain a pessimistically hopeful Bears fan.
The touchdown
Where the FS bit on a pump fake, and the corner got burned? Still a pretty quick play, overall.
If I did what I love for a living, what would I do in my free time?
Writer at windycitygridiron.com {-/-} http://www.twitter.com/kdoggers
No , your right there ...
… that last TD was not a quick pass it was the FS ( Chris Harris ) that should be a SS not getting over to cover the top fast enough . It was a preseason mistake that is easily corrected . Also There was no game plan for this game and that could have been the reason for no scheme changes . And sorry if you gotta place the blame in a coaches lap you may want to lay it in the correct mans lap . Rod was callin the D there homie .
" Everyone has a plan 'till they get punched in the mouth. " ~
Mike Tyson
by MidWayMonster54 on Aug 17, 2010 9:24 PM CDT up reply actions
As far as coaching it's all Lovie's dog and pony show at this point.
He’s been given the opportunity to select (or have a say in the selection) of HOW MANY coordinators/assistants??? This season falls directly on him and more importantly on Angelo with a BIG spotlight directly on Ted Phillips. And this years preseason problems appear to be the same as LAST seasons end of the year problems. We’re still getting burned on the quick slants and hitches. Will we ever adjust in game? Or are we saving that for NEXT season. Not being pessimistic just looking at the body of work. Lovie’s system worked when we got pressure from the front 4. After one preseason game I have yet to see said pressure. That’s all. And that’s a lot.
If you can't laugh at yourself you must not be very funny.
I remain a pessimistically hopeful Bears fan.
I thought last season was directly on him?
Don’t forget Bowman on that play. He missed the jam on his WR, thus giving Harris a very short amount of time to get off the hashmarks.
"In order to have a winner, the team must have a feeling of unity; every player must put the team first- ahead of personal glory" - motivational sign at Halas Hall.
Agree completely.
But we still had zero pressure from our front four. Even our 2’s on their 2’s and down the line.
If you can't laugh at yourself you must not be very funny.
I remain a pessimistically hopeful Bears fan.
Honestly
Idk what you were expecting to see in the 1st real action of the season….This is nothing more than a basic game plan, a series or 2 for the starters and evaluation of everybody else that isnt a lock to make the team. Now if the 3rd preseason game comes around and there is no difference in play from now to that point ,Then we have a problem.
I only need 2 words for my sig now....."NBA CHAMPS"
Just my humble opinion....
But it looks like they were just rusty. Harris had push (not enough to get to a QB, but he was getting some penetration). Melton, granted against other 2nd-3rd stringers was getting amazing penetration for a guy who has never played a regular season snap. Adams wasn’t but he isn’t meant to. Harrison made it obvious he missed large parts of camp, hopefully that improves as time goes on.
Peppers was getting fantastic push on the pocket on nearly (not all) every play. If they had called a 7 step drop the QB would have been blasted. Anderson was getting good dig and is still extremely fast on the outside and looked stronger. He also had a SMALL but significant contribution to the false starts the Chargers RT was giving up. Just what I saw. Gilbert was unimpressive and Izzy was stout but not flashy.
Overall, about half of our line was getting good push or penetration, but rarely all at the same time, so against a quick rhythm game this past Saturday it didn’t give the stats you’d like. I think it might be rust and “gelling” (Just like an O line, D-lines need to learn to feed off of each other) and look forward to improved performance this week.
by Brendan Hess on Aug 18, 2010 7:47 AM CDT up reply actions
There was decent pressure
The chargers just forced a really good pocket on that play—the ends were around and behind the quarterback, but the tackles sealed out really well.
The pump fake came at about 1.5 seconds after the snap, the ball was out with in about 3 seconds. Bowman missing the jam was the direct reason that play failed.
If I did what I love for a living, what would I do in my free time?
Writer at windycitygridiron.com {-/-} http://www.twitter.com/kdoggers
Agree
Harris should have been into the deep zone faster, but it wouldn’t of mattered if the jam had gone off right.
I bet 10 to 1 we don’t work on jams as much as we should since we play mostly zone with our CBs. Guys like Tillman, Graham and Bowman COULD jam great with practice…Add some muscle and Josh Moore will be in that same group.
DJ Moore and Jennings could probably jam Davis if that’s any help…
by Brendan Hess on Aug 18, 2010 7:49 AM CDT up reply actions
The jam
is when they play zone coverage. Rarely will our CBs jam and be expected to cover one on one.
"In order to have a winner, the team must have a feeling of unity; every player must put the team first- ahead of personal glory" - motivational sign at Halas Hall.
I wish
The Bears had CBs that could jam/press and still play man to man
In the 8th grade Mike Ditka won his school's Science Fair with a model of a working volcano. There were 17 other working volcano's made that day, but only one named Mount Ditka.
by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Aug 18, 2010 11:33 AM CDT up reply actions
Me too
Unfortunately, they don’t draft with that strategy in mind.
"In order to have a winner, the team must have a feeling of unity; every player must put the team first- ahead of personal glory" - motivational sign at Halas Hall.
I disagree with ya Just Dave , I disagree .
" Everyone has a plan 'till they get punched in the mouth. " ~
Mike Tyson
by MidWayMonster54 on Aug 18, 2010 1:06 AM CDT up reply actions
Hopefully all the teams we play recognize this
and only use 7 step drop plays when not running the ball..then we should be fine on defense.
"He is remarkably bright", a "terrific talent", the sky is the limit for Cutler"
-Mike Martz-
Major Wright and Devin Aromashadu
Were the ones who stood out most to me, both should be starters come week 1 if their play continues. Wright’s injury could delay his return but he will probably start at some point.
major wright warmed the cockles of my heart
wherever they are.
"What I’m trying to say is that Lovie is an idiot. Let’s not forget this." --celerysalt, WCG commenter
Awesome usage
of the word cockles.
"In order to have a winner, the team must have a feeling of unity; every player must put the team first- ahead of personal glory" - motivational sign at Halas Hall.
Great question
The cockles refer to the valves of the heart. At least that’s what this said
If you can't laugh at yourself you must not be very funny.
I remain a pessimistically hopeful Bears fan.
100% agree
I am a bigger “Hester as a starter” fan than most Bears fans these days but the bottom line is, regardless of who “starts” all three of these wide outs need to see solid playing time and IF he recovers quickly Bennett deserves to be in that statement too. They all bring something just a little bit different, I strongly look forward to seeing 3, if not all 4, of them on the field at the same time this year.
As for Wright, I am a fanboy of his and have been since his play in college, so I am biased, but he looked like he was “in” on about 75% of the snaps he took. 7 actual tackles, good technique, great angles, and quite a few “there just in case” moments where he would have made a tackle had the Charger slipped out of someone else’s grip.
by Brendan Hess on Aug 18, 2010 7:52 AM CDT up reply actions
I agree, Knox looked fantastic.
If he can get that wide open regularly, we will put up some points.
"They say the glee team has lured stragglers into sniper traps with cheery renditions of hit songs." "Really? And people fall for that?"
What O-Line?
You can’t cherry-pick two plays and put all the concerns to bed about the O-Line.
The only thing that counts is not a few explained away plays but The bottom line.
The bottom line is they gave enough surge for a pathetic 2.3 yds per carry and gave up a disastrous 6 sacks in the game.
Couple of things:
You’re taking an average of plays that the majority of which didn’t include the starting line at all.
I didn’t say they did great in the run game, I said the starting offensive line wasn’t that bad as far as pass protection goes, but had more to do with the supporting players not doing their jobs.
I know you want to be down on the offensive line, that’s okay. I don’t mind and I’m sure they don’t either. However, the only place the line looked extremely poor was on the inside runs. Everywhere else there were just as many bright spots as there were dim ones, and usually there was extremely obvious reasons as to what happened.
For instance, I saw a couple of people drinking the haterade when it came to Beekman when he was playing C. That’s a tough damn job to come into a game cold, and then start hiking to a QB you had almost no reps with. He could have looked much better, but when you’re focusing on the exchange that means you’re not focusing on the guys in front of you enough, not to mention not getting proper leverage due to the delay in getting off the blocks.
Long story short, I can’t cherry pick two plays out of how many? The starting line was in for like two series, and the only sack that I saw occur was a direct result of Forte whiffing and nothing to do with the line. When does it become okay to just discuss two plays? Two out of ten? Two out of five? I guess we shouldn’t cherry pick when it comes to Cutler since he only had two completions either. Colon Close Parenthesis.
Associate Writer - WindyCityGridiron.com - Artist formerly known as Sklz711
by Jacob Hayes on Aug 18, 2010 12:45 AM CDT up reply actions
Mediocre is the word from my perspective
which kind of makes you both right. The line did struggle but was not completely inept…Is that okay for a 1st game? Sure. The Chargers had like 5-6 penalties on their O line in that game, versus our surrendering of extreme amounts of interior pressure. I will NEVER blame a covered lineman for a CB Blitz sack though, and the tight ends and running backs surely need some more drill work.
I think Louis had good strength but mediocre technique. He may have been over thinking. Hard to judge Kreutz, he played few snaps. Williams looked good (not amazing, but solid). Omiyale wasn’t half as bad as some feared and may settle in fine after all….Garza is taking the adjustment to LG rough.
Our 2nd-3rd string O line is 100% disastrous. Marten as a Guard is worse than Omiyale as a Guard. Schaffer still can’t get out of his stance fast enough (which is why he got dumped by Cleveland). Beekman loses the battle against a Nose Tackle 95% of the time, even with some help.
My biggest concern on the line wasn’t just run blocking, but interior push. Our interior was caving, not pushing. That needs to change.
by Brendan Hess on Aug 18, 2010 7:57 AM CDT up reply actions
And they will do that all year long
So the Chargers used the game to practice real game activities and get real information on their players to improve before regular season.
Lovie just sent his team in there to play around. “We didn’t really prepare”? Seems we heard that a few times from him last year too, after some pretty humiliating blowouts. Not the best attitude for starting a season.
THANK YOU!
Finally, someone who has identified the real issue. This isn’t about “the first pre-season game”, it’s about the lack of preparation and lack of urgency this team has had for years. There’s always an excuse with Lovie. “It’s the first pre-season game”, “it’s only the first quarter of the season”, “we still have a lot of football to play”, “we didn’t expect them to play that much no-huddle”. He has the most lackadaisical attitude of anyone this side of Dick Jauron.
I’ve said it a million times and I’ll say it a million more, teams take on the personality of their head coach (manager in baseball). Lovie and his teams never seem to have a sense of urgency. They always act as if they have all the time in the world to make changes or improve. How many times over the last 6 years have we seen them take their time getting out of huddles at the end of the half or the end of the game, even in a tight contest. It’s the general attitude that they don’t really think anything bad can happen to them.
I said it in an earlier post right after the game, the biggest disappointment from Saturday night was, even with a completely new offensive scheme, the game had the same feel with the same issues that their games in the regular season the last few years have had. Why change when we’re doing so great?
OT, but finally got to watch the game tonight...
and in the commercial break they said Favre was at training camp. Apparently they sent the mullet and two guys I could care less about to MS, and Little Boy Purple came back on a plane. Talking heads doubted he would play first game against New Orleans…don’t doubt that a bit the way they jacked him up in the post-season.
All history aside, Favre is putting himself into a position to get really messed up this season and that seems really stupid to me. I don’t think he’s going to be the player he was last year. I think if he makes it through the season it will be a miracle.
Jake is right, we did have a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
i cant imagine him missing th NO game
simply for the reason that he holds a ridiculously robust record number of consecutive starts. i can’t imagine him ending it w/o a fight. Even if it’s just for a series, i bet he starts against NO.
"What I’m trying to say is that Lovie is an idiot. Let’s not forget this." --celerysalt, WCG commenter
I'm glad he's in training camp
Every snap he takes from Jackson and Rosenfels is one less rep they get before actual NFL games after his ankle gives out completely.
[...]when Giants coach Steve Owen, a certified defensive genius, was asked how he planned to stop Nagurski, he said: "With a shotgun, as he’s leaving the dressing room."
by NobodySpecial on Aug 18, 2010 1:06 AM CDT up reply actions
I think the Saints showed
that you just rough Farve [sic] up and take whatever penalties comes, because at this age he will get hurt and/or rattled. I expect many teams to adopt this tactic.
I hear that....
But name me the QB that doesn’t get rattled under pressure. The so called “Blue print to Favre” that essentially just says get pressure on him is accurate for any QB in the league. All QBs are better when they have time to make plays. Manning had his 6 interception clunker against the Chargers because of pressure. Brady lost a Super Bowl because of pressure. Its not the blue print, its CAN you get enough pressure.
I would submit the only difference with Favre is that he is VERY prone to extending a play and is slower in his 40s, so you get about 0.5 to 1 second longer to get that hit in than with many other QBs.
by Brendan Hess on Aug 18, 2010 7:59 AM CDT up reply actions
Best part about our D line was....
They actually took up the whole O line. When we blitzed, we had guys come free or facing RBs/TEs, as it should be. That may seem trivial but it could be huge when the season starts. Last year we had Guards uncovering over to our interior blitzers and sometimes Tackles grabbing our exterior blitzers. If our 4 can take 5-6 to block, our blitzes could actually work this year.
That’s my last post for now, I know I just spammed our chat.
The best part of the game
was our offenses ability to have guys wide open nearly every play. The scheme had them running free on many plays which should translate to a higher completion % for sizzle. Now if we can only run the ball more then 2-3 yards we may have something.
"He is remarkably bright", a "terrific talent", the sky is the limit for Cutler"
-Mike Martz-
A few bright spots for our depth
While I agree DJ looked good, I thought the same thing from Jennings. I thought both guys showed good tackling technique. Which is key, when considering their size.
I thought Melton & Gilbert showed good push from their respective positions. Seeing it from Gilbert really surprised me. I hadn’t heard anything about him since he was drafted… I believe it was Gilbert that forced an interception, because of a very impressive bull-rush he put on the opposing left tackle (again, I may be thinking of two different plays).
I know Quintin Scott has a long way to go… But with that said, he looked better than Alfalava and his upside is ridiculous! If I’m Lovie (and I wish I was), I’d find a way to keep this guy a Bear. Very intriguing player.
I
I wish you were Lovie, too.
Actually, let me re-phrase that, I wish YOU were the Head Coach of the Bears.
Let me re-phrase that, again, I wish ANYONE ELSE was the Head Coach of the Bears.
I thought the best play
was the 3rd and long in the red zone when Cutler didn’t force anything, and instead scrambled for a minimal gain thus ensuring a shot at a FG
In the 8th grade Mike Ditka won his school's Science Fair with a model of a working volcano. There were 17 other working volcano's made that day, but only one named Mount Ditka.
by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Aug 18, 2010 9:47 AM CDT reply actions
Me too!
Hopefully Cutler play within himself all year.
I also thought Tinoisamoa edged out Roach in this game.
Me too
but he seemed to do that last preseason as well. The real test will be when the games that matter begin.
"In order to have a winner, the team must have a feeling of unity; every player must put the team first- ahead of personal glory" - motivational sign at Halas Hall.
From my perspective
I made it a point to look at Omiyale on almost every play, and I got to say he played pretty darn well. In the running game he got a good push, and on passing plays kept his man in front of him most of the time. I know the guy is easy to gang up on, but he didn’t commit a false start all game I believe.
The RBs looked bad on running plays; why does Forte always seem to run into one of his blockers? I just don’t see him being a above-average runner ever. I can almost guarantee you Taylor and Bell will put a dent into his majority work load.
Here are my players on the rise:
Melton, Omi, Wright, and Louis.
Players on the decline:
AA, Gilbert, DJ Moore, and Forte (as a runner only).
"In order to have a winner, the team must have a feeling of unity; every player must put the team first- ahead of personal glory" - motivational sign at Halas Hall.
I like your players on the rise
Wright was more than we could’ve hoped for. Louis and Melton showed true promise. Omi showed he could be a capable RT.
Mixed opinion on your decline guys. AA doesn’t resemble the player he was, this time last year. We completely agree on him. DJ Moore and Gilbert are guys that look like they’ve improved (granted, my expectations for them were low going into the San Diego game). So for me, I’m gonna wait and see if they (Moore & Gilbert) continue to improve vs. Oakland. As for Forte, its difficult for me to say he’s declining, when none of the other RBs faired any better.
I’m sure we’ll know more come Saturday night!
Forte
I’ve kind of soured on him cause he’s not dynamic, and has zero ability to break a tackle or bounce a run outside. At least this has been the trend since last season. I saw a few holes most RBs should make it through versus San Diego, namely the one where a truck could’ve been driven through the gap, but ended getting hit from the weak side. As a NFL starting running back this should never happen.
As far as Moore and Gilbert goes, they didn’t stand out to me. They’re currently on the outside looking in until they generate some positive plays.
"In order to have a winner, the team must have a feeling of unity; every player must put the team first- ahead of personal glory" - motivational sign at Halas Hall.
Forte hasn’t shown that he can break tackles, agreed. But IMHO, he’s shown he can get to the outside and I’ve seen him reverse field pretty well, as well.
I would’ve sworn it was Gilbert that showed a good bull-rush… maybe I’m wrong. Unfortunately I deleted the game, so I can’t go back and look.
I think Moore is the back up nickel, at worst.

by 






















