FanPost

53-man Roster is not simple, fans of 6 WRs.

I think it's going to be a VERY tough 53-man roster for the Bears in 2010.  Take a look at this "mock" (I use that loosely) depth chart I have put together:

 

Thisdoesn't reflect names...

2 QBs
4 RBs
0 FBs
6 WRs
4 TEs
9 OLs
9 DL
7 LBs
6 DBs
5 Safties
1 K
1 P

 

Notice something about that?

 

That's right-- it's 54.

 

I think the interesting areas of the roster are the DL (cut one?), DBs (not enough?), and-- yes-- WRs (too many?).

 

Where do you see the cut given all the statements, practices, and player's franchise status (i.e.-- drafted, recent FA, contract, etc.)?

<em>This FanPost was written by a Windy City Gridiron member, and does not necessarily reflect the ideas or opinions of its staff or community.</em>

X
Log In Sign Up

forgot?
Log In Sign Up

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

Join Windy City Gridiron

You must be a member of Windy City Gridiron to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Windy City Gridiron. You should read them.

Join Windy City Gridiron

You must be a member of Windy City Gridiron to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Windy City Gridiron. You should read them.

Spinner

Authenticating

Great!

Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.

tracking_pixel_9341_tracker