Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Trent Richardson Interviews Fellow Brown Brandon Weeden

Watch for deeper zones vs. the Martz offense

Photo

Statistically the Mike Martz offense had a heck of a debut, and Jay Cutler had a nice start to the year.  His one interception was thrown into triple coverage, and into a deeper zone coverage like ones he'll see all season long.  With the Bears now trying to stretch the field more vertically than in years past (a staple of any Air Coryell derived offense), you need to look for defenses to adjust their zones accordingly.

Star-divide

Whatever zone coverages the Bears see this season, they'll see them setting their underneath zone deeper than in years past.  The deep part of the zone coverage won't change as whoever is deep is always taught to be deeper than the deepest offensive player.  Here is a basic Cover 3, from NFP, the Bears may see this season:

Cover_203_medium

The strong safety will roll up to replace the corner that is going back to cover deep third, and be responsible for the flat/curl zone.  The weak-side OLB will take the other flat/curl zone, leaving the MLB and strong-side OLB to the middle of the field looking for hook/curl.  This cover 3 gives a 3 deep 4 under look. 

The variance the Bears may see in 2010, is the underneath part of the zone will set up shop deeper.  They will set the depth of the zone based on the drop of the QB.  If Jay Cutler takes a 7 step drop, the four under part of the zone (SS and 3 LBs in this cover 3) will drop until Cutler sets, then they will flatten out and cover their zones.  On the pick Cutler threw, the receiver was in front of the deepest defenders, but he was bracketed in front by a deeper than usual underneath zone.  It appeared to be triple coverage so Cutler should have checked down, but that's another story.

One thing Martz is trying to do against a zone defense is run his deep dig route (about a 12-15 yard in) and draw the safety up, leaving a one on one look on a streaking receiver (remember Martz wants to stretch a D vertically).  If the deep safety fails to bite up, the dig should be open against a normal zone, but if teams are setting their zone depth deeper they take away the dig.

One thing the Bears can do to keep defenses honest in their zones is run long shallow drag routes from their far split receivers.  The longer the crossing route, the deeper the underneath zones will set up, and the more open the receiver should be.  But, the thing to be wary of against a zone is if the defenders don't set their depth too deep running through a zone is a great way to get a receiver killed (Devin Aromashodu got popped a few times against the Lions).  If the zone is at normal depth, the receiver has to settle down in the pocket between defenders.

One other option the receivers have is after showing the dig route, to belly back under the zone coverage.  A lot of what the Bears do will be predicated on the look the defense will give them.  Having both the QB and WRs on the same page and recognizing the depth the zone sets up is crucial to their passing game.

Comment 34 comments  |  6 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Pick your poison against this Martzfense...

Send your CBs & FS deep, then pay the price. Price being in the form of Forte/Taylor or an underneath WR. They should out athlete in one in the area for big chunks of yardage.

Then if the opposing D’s begin to worry about the shallow stuff… Opportunities will open up deep and on the sidelines. It’s like we have a real offense or something…

Love your X’s & O’s as usual Wilt!

by rdent4hof on Sep 14, 2010 11:20 AM CDT reply actions  

should out athlete in anyone in the area for big chunks of yardage.

by rdent4hof on Sep 14, 2010 11:23 AM CDT up reply actions  

Hey Wilt.....

Very informative as usual. You know your isht.

by Dozjah on Sep 14, 2010 11:29 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

I am anxious to see...

the development of the deeper routes during the course of this season. I have not seen too many great long routes run yet and I hope Knox can learn his routes better. He seems a bit tentative. Hester has been underwhelming and even DA did not catch the ball well this last week. The big issue, of course, is the awful o-line. If they get Cutler maybe 1 more second, this offense would be outstanding! I am hoping the Bears do not go to the drag routes and screens this week. The Dallas defense is quick and agile, so Forte will not out finesse their D (except old man Brooking). My hope is the Bears can establish a slower pace and run inside to open up the deep routes because the safety is being pulled toward run support.

IT'S NOT TOO LATE TO FIRE LOVIE!

by LostInSTL on Sep 14, 2010 11:32 AM CDT reply actions  

i have hope

that we can get those holes for taylor and forte to run through and i dont think the skins line is much better than ours hopefully we see better results this week for the run game.

Im interested to see if Olsen is used different against dallas, their safeties are their weak spot on defense and Olsen should beat them easily

by Bear Lovin 21 on Sep 14, 2010 12:24 PM CDT up reply actions  

Pretty much what i saw in the lions game. Makes perfect sense.

I saw Hester on alot of those underneath routes. He should be able to dominate in YAC. How can this be applied to the red zone offense?

You can't see California without Marlon Brando's eyes.

by ifuwannacrownem on Sep 14, 2010 11:35 AM CDT via mobile reply actions  

I don't think we have one of those.

"The time has come to get deeply into Football. It is the only thing we have left that ain't fixed." - HST

by JerBear50 on Sep 14, 2010 11:47 PM CDT up reply actions  

Good stuff Lester.

Much appreciated, as always.

-------
www.cheekymonkeyart.com | facebook.com/cheekymonkeyart | twitter.com/cheekymonkeyart

by David Taylor on Sep 14, 2010 11:43 AM CDT reply actions  

So then

Say the Bears line up shotgun, or with the extra wide receiver/tight end out there. Should we absolutely expect them to get out of this immediately, or do you think they’ll still keep the three deep to try and prevent getting thrown over their heads.

If I did what I love for a living, what would I do in my free time?

Writer at windycitygridiron.com {-/-} http://www.twitter.com/kdoggers

by Kev H on Sep 14, 2010 12:05 PM CDT reply actions  

If the Bears show a 3 WR set

The defense will bring in a nickle back in place of one of the linebackers, but the 3 deep 4 under look stays the same regardless of who the Bears have in.

If the Bears show a spread receiver look, the defense still could widen out with them and show a presnap read (for Cutler) of man to man, then on the snap they will go to their zones.

One Cover 3 variation is to go 3 deep 3 under with someone man to man on the best receiver.

That Cover 3 above is basically what the Bears were in when Calvin Johnson almost beat them. But my guess is they were in either a nickle or dime package.

In the 8th grade Mike Ditka won his school's Science Fair with a model of a working volcano. There were 17 other working volcano's made that day, but only one named Mount Ditka.

by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Sep 14, 2010 12:19 PM CDT up reply actions  

Doesn't this bode well for...

a team with a lot of speed threats?

-------
www.cheekymonkeyart.com | facebook.com/cheekymonkeyart | twitter.com/cheekymonkeyart

by David Taylor on Sep 14, 2010 12:26 PM CDT up reply actions  

and that there's no consesus...

on who the Bears’ best receiver really is?

-------
www.cheekymonkeyart.com | facebook.com/cheekymonkeyart | twitter.com/cheekymonkeyart

by David Taylor on Sep 14, 2010 12:27 PM CDT up reply actions  

it should

the Bears should have a deep threat on every play

In the 8th grade Mike Ditka won his school's Science Fair with a model of a working volcano. There were 17 other working volcano's made that day, but only one named Mount Ditka.

by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Sep 14, 2010 12:33 PM CDT up reply actions  

Looking at the video

It appears that they have the nickel back in, but the nickel back was part of the blitz with Urlacher. Briggs fakes up, but then drops back on the tight end, and eventually releases him to wright. With him going up the middle past wright, it appears to freeze Manning in the deep middle just enough that he doesn’t have the time to read it and get over to assist Bowman.

If I did what I love for a living, what would I do in my free time?

Writer at windycitygridiron.com {-/-} http://www.twitter.com/kdoggers

by Kev H on Sep 14, 2010 12:29 PM CDT up reply actions  

If they blitzed 2

and were in a 3 deep look, then the 2 remaining defenders were either in a man to man or a 2 under zone, or a combination of the two by staying on a man til he got too deep

In the 8th grade Mike Ditka won his school's Science Fair with a model of a working volcano. There were 17 other working volcano's made that day, but only one named Mount Ditka.

by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Sep 14, 2010 12:32 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yeah.

I just told you this, but I thought I’d enlighten everyone else.

The Bears do indeed lineup in a 3 deep Nickel package.

At the snap, Urlacher and D.J. Moore are in on the blitz. The blitz looks designed to overload the LT/LG, which, quite obviously, was pointed out to be a sore spot for the Lions offensive line earlier in the game. Major Wright breaks to Tillman’s side to cover the underneath on that side of the field, which would likely have been Moore’s responsibility were he not part of the blitz package.

Tillman, Manning, and Bowman all go to their three deep zone, like they’re supposed to. This leaves a wide open hole on Bowman’s side of the field, but the Lions dont have anyone over there, because the RB had to stay in to block the 6 man pass rush converging on Hill.

Briggs takes two steps up, but drops back to take the middle underneath zone, as Scheffler runs largely right by him. (The Blitz look puts Briggs just a hair out of being able to shadow Scheffler better.) Briggs loses Scheffler about 5 yards away from the line of scrimmage, when I’d like to think he was probably responsible for being a little deeper than that.)

As a result of that Briggs releases him to Manning. Now, Scheffler’s route is fading him to the right a bit, towards Johnson, so Manning is already moving that way a little. I can’t tell when exactly he knows that the ball is going to Johnson, but he’s about two, maybe three steps from being able to better assist the play. These steps are the likely result of having Scheffler released to him maybe a little sooner than he’d like.

So maybe, just maybe, if they hadn’t shown the WILL step up, perhaps Manning could’ve had more time to help make a play, and then we wouldn’t be breaking this down in the first place.

If I did what I love for a living, what would I do in my free time?

Writer at windycitygridiron.com {-/-} http://www.twitter.com/kdoggers

by Kev H on Sep 14, 2010 1:02 PM CDT up reply actions  

Not the WILL

but you know what I meant.

If I did what I love for a living, what would I do in my free time?

Writer at windycitygridiron.com {-/-} http://www.twitter.com/kdoggers

by Kev H on Sep 14, 2010 1:44 PM CDT up reply actions  

Scheffler gets past Briggs a little too easy.

Like I said, I think his zone was supposed to be just a little deeper than that. But again, when your defense is predicated on faking those linebackers on the blitz before dropping into coverage, you’re forcing them to lose a step to a guy who’s released free at the LOS and sprinting up the middle of the field.

To their credit, the Lions did a good job of picking up the blitz long enough for Hill to float the jump ball up there, if he holds it for roughly one more second, the pocket probably collapses in his face.

If I did what I love for a living, what would I do in my free time?

Writer at windycitygridiron.com {-/-} http://www.twitter.com/kdoggers

by Kev H on Sep 14, 2010 2:45 PM CDT up reply actions  

I wouldn't credit the Lions for picking up our ineffective blitz

I wish FootballOutsiders detailed blitz effectiveness, so I can see if my theory is correct: The Bears are the worst blitzing team in the NFL.

"You win because of the quarterback. We have to get that position stabilized. We're fixated on that." -- Jerry Angelo (12.30.2008)

Jerry Angelo trades for Jay Cutler! (4.2.2009)

by SackMan on Sep 14, 2010 6:40 PM CDT up reply actions  

Briggs and Urlacher both had effective blitzes

I don’t think I’ve ever typed that before.

In the 8th grade Mike Ditka won his school's Science Fair with a model of a working volcano. There were 17 other working volcano's made that day, but only one named Mount Ditka.

by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Sep 14, 2010 9:08 PM CDT up reply actions  

Well I for one, hope you get to type that 18 more times.

David Taylor's personal hype man. Check out his website unless you're a loser. http://www.cheekymonkeyart.com/

by Ditkavsworld on Sep 15, 2010 9:15 AM CDT up reply actions  

"The Bears are the worst blitzing team in the NFL"

Agreed. And they have been for 3 years, now.

in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.

by Timothy Hockemeyer on Sep 16, 2010 9:50 AM CDT up reply actions  

Great stuff Lester

Love seeing the actual schematics.

by bbilko on Sep 14, 2010 12:53 PM CDT reply actions  

Nice breakdown

"We were freaking robbed!! Our defense totally dominated all day! What? we gave up nearly 500 yards on defense? Yeah but we stopped them on the 1 yrd line! Our D is awesome!!"

- Entire kool aid drinkin' Pride of Detroit site-

by tfrabotta on Sep 14, 2010 1:29 PM CDT reply actions  

Top knotch work once again buddy.

David Taylor's personal hype man. Check out his website unless you're a loser. http://www.cheekymonkeyart.com/

by Ditkavsworld on Sep 14, 2010 3:03 PM CDT reply actions  

So that's coverage

But as I watched the Jets last night I couldn’t help but think that the Bears are going to be screwed against them come December because the 7 step drop will give the Jets D all day to smother Cutler. The best way to beat an all-out blitz D is the 3 step drop (See: Marino against 46 D in ‘85) but will Martz use a 3 step drop? I assume he would, he isn’t thickheaded enough to go against a D like that without preparing.

"I feel like the pieces are in place. But we have to execute...It's about execution. You have to execute. You have to have a scheme that facilitates the strengths of your players. If it doesn't, then it's a bad scheme. It's that simple. So we feel real good about the parts in place on offense."

"We feel very good about this football team. We felt very good about our football teams in the past and it's no different. You've got to go out there and you've got to do it."
-Jerry Angelo, Aug. 2, 2010

by Sam Householder on Sep 14, 2010 7:59 PM CDT reply actions  

Against the Lions

The Bears didn’t do a lot of 7 step drop stuff

from todays Tribune

Of Jay Cutler’s pure drop-backs, more than half (12 of 23) were either three- or five-step drops. Many of those also called for quick throws so blockers didn’t have to protect for long.

and later in the article

When Martz did call for seven-step drops on 11 snaps, it was an adventure, even though he only sent more than three receivers on routes three times on those plays.

There were two sacks and two pressures allowed on seven-step drops, and an interception thrown. But the play of the game — Matt Forte’s fourth-quarter touchdown reception — also was on a seven-step drop with no help for the O-line.

In the 8th grade Mike Ditka won his school's Science Fair with a model of a working volcano. There were 17 other working volcano's made that day, but only one named Mount Ditka.

by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Sep 14, 2010 9:11 PM CDT up reply actions  

Uh, Lester, with all due respect. And I do respect you...

They 7 step dropped on nearly HALF the drop back pass attempts according to you. Nearly half constitutes a LOT in my book. If you were to tell me that any team went shotgun on 11 of 23 attempts I’d say they went in a shotgun formation a LOT. I know this doesn’t count roll outs and bootlegs (and shotgun) but those are just variations on longer “drop backs” so to speak. AND two sacks on the seven step drop back is HALF the TOTAL sacks allowed. And he only sent 3 receivers on 3 of those plays. So we HAVE to go MAX protect on the other 8 just to have success? Plus the pick? Glad we got the one big play out of 11 with 2 being ugly sacks. Great concept.

If you can't laugh at yourself you must not be very funny.
I remain a pessimistically hopeful Bears fan.

by Just Dave on Sep 14, 2010 10:09 PM CDT up reply actions  

Jay Cutler had 35 passing attempts

and Martz called 11 seven step drops…

Can you please explain how 11 of 35 is nearly half? By my math it’s a tad over 31% of his passing attempts were 7 step drops.

In the 8th grade Mike Ditka won his school's Science Fair with a model of a working volcano. There were 17 other working volcano's made that day, but only one named Mount Ditka.

by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Sep 15, 2010 8:43 AM CDT up reply actions  

Nearly half the DROP BACK passes.

And almost 1/3rd is still a lot. And to have 1/2 of your sacks come from something you yourself are arguing they didn’t use a lot of?? Small sampling either way. We’ll see more this weekend.

If you can't laugh at yourself you must not be very funny.
I remain a pessimistically hopeful Bears fan.

by Just Dave on Sep 15, 2010 8:49 AM CDT up reply actions  

a passing attempt is a passing attempt

and I was just block quoting the Trib.

But just so I know we’re on the same page, 31% of something is still a lot… check.

In the 8th grade Mike Ditka won his school's Science Fair with a model of a working volcano. There were 17 other working volcano's made that day, but only one named Mount Ditka.

by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Sep 15, 2010 9:05 AM CDT up reply actions  

and if you add in the 5 other times a pass play was called

but Cutler scrambled, we’re up to 40 pass plays, and the new percentage is 27.5% (is that still a lot) ;)

In the 8th grade Mike Ditka won his school's Science Fair with a model of a working volcano. There were 17 other working volcano's made that day, but only one named Mount Ditka.

by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Sep 15, 2010 9:38 AM CDT up reply actions  

This is great, we are actually discussing a potent Bear offense

Early on it looks like Martzffense is a perfect match for Cutlers style of play. All this discussion distills down to more defenders in deep zones means less defenders in the box which should open up the ground game. If we balance the ground game with the aerial assault this offense can be unstoppable.
Next, we combine this with solid defense, Briggs/Urlacher playing to 2006 form we might be on to something here.
Cut down the mistakes, fumbles and INTs and we just might give the fudge packers a run for this division. Go Bears.

White Sox fans need not apply.

by Bears-Cubs Bulls on Sep 14, 2010 9:51 PM CDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Windy City Gridiron is the best independent site on the internet for breaking news, in-depth analysis, and hardcore discussion about the Chicago Bears

Community Guidelines

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Images-8_small
Why the Offensive Line will be fine.
Images_small
*A Modest Proposal

Recent FanPosts

029_small
Solving a Crisis: Redzone Edition
Windycityflyer_small
SMD's Bottom 5
Images-8_small
Yahoo Fantasy Football Sign-up. Need contact info soon
Small
We may not know DT Nate Collins but the Chicago Bears do.
029_small
Is it time for a contract? Oh no, not another Matt Forte post...
Burlacher2_small
Is Winning Games a Specialty?
Burlacher2_small
Apparently, Defense Wins Championships...
Fox_small
Bad start for AJ Jenkins
Burlacher2_small
What's It Take to Win?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Windycity_small Adam T

189886_210123485665309_100000029768895_888721_5830650_n__1__small Dane Noble

Editors

Sackwatchcutler_small Lester A. Wiltfong Jr.

535321_3734130120778_1501804679_3253247_588486681_n_small David Taylor

Orange_shy_guy_small Steven Schweickert

Capture_small Kev H

Contributing Writers

Lincoln_small Sam Householder

Leprechaun_small Spongie

Polishsausage_small Steve Ronkowski

Icothgmts_small T.J. Shouse

Joe_20mantegna-bill_20swerski_small Superfans

P981d5c2_reasonably_small_small DaveGilbertNFL