Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Most Dangerous Division in Sports

Chicago Bears screen game looking good

In my Tuesday post, Watch for deeper zones vs. the Martz offense, I talked about a couple ways the Bears could keep defenses honest if they set their underneath zone deeper to take away the deep dig routes that are so prevalent in the Martz offense.  Bellying the dig route back under the D and running long shallow crossing routes are good ways to beat a deeper set up zone.  But the best way to hurt a defense that settles into their zones a bit deeper is with the screen pass.  (I'm disappointed in myself for not mentioning it on Tuesday, but I had WRs on the brain!)

And since it's also an effective way to slow down an aggressive pass rush, and the Bears offensive line dosen't seem to be too adept at pass blocking...  yet, it makes perfect sense for Mike Martz to keep the screen at the forefront of the game planning.

Star-divide

I'll admit, I've long been jealous of the Green Bay Packers ability to gash the Bears with the screen.  I've longed for the Bears and former offensive coordinator Ron Turner to perfect this basic play.  While I think the wide receiver slip screen and bubble screen has a place in an NFL offense, the basic screen to a running back is something I don't remember the Bears having too much success with in recent years.

Inducing a pass rush up-field is the first part of a successful screen.  Convincing a defensive lineman (they're not the sharpest tools in the shed) that he's beat his block and has an open shot at the QB isn't the most difficult thing to do.  Doing so when you are actually struggling to pass block makes it even easier.  So the Bears O-Line should be great at it.

Step two is the running back, or on occasion the TE, to feign his block just enough as to not give away his actual intent.  Slipping out for a pass. If the back slips out to quickly a smart defender will follow him and disrupt the play, and since the screen call is usually an all or nothing play the QB is forced to throw the pass in the dirt.  (Or to a waiting defensive linemen, but Jay Cutler is done with that option... we hope)

Step three is the offensive line pulling to set up their blocks for the screen.  The O-Line has to know how long to hold their blocks before allowing the defense through.  Hold too long, and the pursuit angles the defender has is shorter, hold the block too little and the QB is running for his life.  Also if the O-Line fails to sell the initial block the D-Line may read screen all the way.  Block, let the defense in, pull to set up the blocks.  The Bears have a fairly athletic group of offensive linemen, and pulling is one of their strong suits.

From Yahoo Sports:

Six screen plays picked up 132 yards Sunday, execution that hasn't been seen from the Bears in a long time.

Mike Martz called for a variety of different screens, although five went to Matt Forte and one to tight end Greg Olsen. Quarterback Jay Cutler said the screens worked because the Lions were frequently playing Cover 2 and taking deeper drops in coverage.

Wait a minute, the Lions play some Cover 2 also?

"It depends on the coverage," he said. "We started off early, and we shifted them to death a little bit. They started backing off and going with a little bit of Cover 2. If you get (receivers) up on the linebackers, those screens are going to go a long way."

With the way the Bears backs can catch the ball, I'd expect the screen to be a big part of the offense.  And hopefully they'll have a few more NFC Player of the week honors to come.

*  If you're one of my dozen or so regular readers, you may have noticed my post is up a little earlier than usual.  That's because Windy City Gridiron is debuting a new feature later today.  Be sure to check it out!!!

Comment 23 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I'm all for the Bears...

running the screens to the RBs/TEs. It is a sensible and likely effective way to assuage the effects of poor individual blocking. However, I hope it does not become the answer to the Bears o-line struggles. Eventually, D-lines will adjust and run stunts designed to take away the screen. I agree the Bears offense has the appropriate personnel to be a great screen team; Forte/Taylor/Olsen are perfect for it. But it need to be a means to an end for the Bears. It can be a way to open up the defense and get some better results out of the deep routes and traps and counters. But the fundamental blocking still needs to improve overall or all the screens in the world won’t make any difference.

IT'S NOT TOO LATE TO FIRE LOVIE!

by LostInSTL on Sep 16, 2010 9:17 AM CDT reply actions  

It's all about keeping them honest

Five or six effective screens a game is a good mix with the regular vertical offense. And if they start running stunts with the sole idea of taking away the screen Martz will kill the defense.

In the 8th grade Mike Ditka won his school's Science Fair with a model of a working volcano. There were 17 other working volcano's made that day, but only one named Mount Ditka.

by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Sep 16, 2010 9:21 AM CDT up reply actions  

Agreed...

that’s kind of my point. The screens are something that’s been lacking from the Bear’s arsenal for too long. However, if the line does not get better at blocking overall, opposing defenses (especially 3-4 defenses) will simply game plan for them with zone blitzes and other schemes that will allow them to pressure the QB and still get after screens. I guess what I’m trying to get at is there is only some much time for practice and screens are not simple (as you point out above). So does it take time away for the fundamental blocking reps the o-line needs so desperately?

IT'S NOT TOO LATE TO FIRE LOVIE!

by LostInSTL on Sep 16, 2010 9:39 AM CDT up reply actions  

gotta like the writing of anyone who uses assuage correctly in a sports context!

Also, great info in this post Wilt. It made me think a lot and understand the intent of the game a little better.

"Stay thirsty, my friend."

by Maelvampyre on Sep 16, 2010 2:06 PM CDT up reply actions  

Thanks

In the 8th grade Mike Ditka won his school's Science Fair with a model of a working volcano. There were 17 other working volcano's made that day, but only one named Mount Ditka.

by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Sep 16, 2010 2:24 PM CDT up reply actions  

Thanks...

It’s a fun sounding word, idn’t!

IT'S NOT TOO LATE TO FIRE LOVIE!

by LostInSTL on Sep 16, 2010 7:29 PM CDT up reply actions  

Nice Article!!!

I’m glad you wrote this article regarding the Bears screen game. I’ve been saying to my bro and dad that we have been one of the worst teams at executing the screen for many years. Obviously with Martz, the screen was executed exceptionally well against the Lions and it stood out like a sore thumb to me and my bro. Let’s keep it up fellas!!!

by Stellarpete22 on Sep 16, 2010 9:18 AM CDT reply actions  

O-Line perfect for Screen game

We’re so porous with letting teams get pressure on Cutler, it was good to see screens go for positive yardage last week.Could be a good bailout against Cowboys this week with the pressure I’m sure we’ll face from their front 7. Hopefully the days of the Hester negative yardage bubble screen are gone for good.

If its free, take two.

by T.J. Shouse on Sep 16, 2010 9:35 AM CDT reply actions  

I'm perplexed!

Another team runs the cover-2? I thought the Bears were the only team to run that stupid, antiquated scheme. No freakin’ way.

The screen pass (to RBs) has been a lost art for the Bears offense for quite awhile. I’m pleasantly surprised to see Forte run wild versus the Lions. I agree this will be the best way to combat heavy pressure by the D-line, and an efficient way to keep the opposing secondaries honest.

"In order to have a winner, the team must have a feeling of unity; every player must put the team first- ahead of personal glory" - motivational sign at Halas Hall.

by propheteer on Sep 16, 2010 10:32 AM CDT reply actions  

Cover-2 is a fairly standard 4-3 defensive formation...

In its most basic form, the Cover 2 is simply a system that utilizes 2 deep Safeties to cover the deeper routes. Of course, there are intricacies that I’m not fully aware of in the Lovie-Two scheme, but utilizing basic cover-2 is fairly standard for the 4-3 defensive lineup.

by Doshi on Sep 16, 2010 10:54 AM CDT up reply actions  

Sarcasm fail

I’m one of the biggest proponents and defenders on this site over the cover-2. There are a lot of people that can’t comprehend that almost every team, if not all, run it at some point during any given game.

"In order to have a winner, the team must have a feeling of unity; every player must put the team first- ahead of personal glory" - motivational sign at Halas Hall.

by propheteer on Sep 16, 2010 11:36 AM CDT up reply actions  

Every team runs it

Cover 1, Cover 2 (and the Tampa 2), Cover 3, and Cover 4 is in every defensive playbook

In the 8th grade Mike Ditka won his school's Science Fair with a model of a working volcano. There were 17 other working volcano's made that day, but only one named Mount Ditka.

by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Sep 16, 2010 12:17 PM CDT up reply actions  

The cover-4 is what should've been called on that controversial play!

At least Mega should’ve had a safety over the top.

"In order to have a winner, the team must have a feeling of unity; every player must put the team first- ahead of personal glory" - motivational sign at Halas Hall.

by propheteer on Sep 16, 2010 4:35 PM CDT up reply actions  

The cover 4

dosen’t usually provide a safety help over the top, it’s the two corners retreating to get depth with the two safetys getting deep. Each man has a 1/4 of the deep field. With either 3 or 4 under… Since the Bears usually rush 4 they have 3 under.

If you are looking for over the top safety help, then you’re looking for the beloved Cover 2.

Some Cover 3 looks also give over safety help, but only if you run the Cover 3 shell with man to man.

In the 8th grade Mike Ditka won his school's Science Fair with a model of a working volcano. There were 17 other working volcano's made that day, but only one named Mount Ditka.

by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Sep 17, 2010 9:10 AM CDT up reply actions  

That's good to know

With that said, I would think our safeties awareness (I almost threw up a little) when only covering a fourth of the field would allow some discretionary help.

"They form a huddle- Whisper like they want trouble- I melt the ice grills into rainwater puddles- Make the proud-hearted leave on the humble- Black steel in the hour- Assemble my skill form my power" - Mos Def

by propheteer on Sep 17, 2010 11:45 AM CDT up reply actions  

But not every team that runs it

Has their corners routinely give the opposing teams’ corners a 5-10 yard cushion.

by JimmyMack on Sep 18, 2010 11:41 AM CDT up reply actions  

Sry, didn't catch the sarcasm...

Internet forums are a terrible place to attempt it, dontcha think?

by Doshi on Sep 16, 2010 2:59 PM CDT up reply actions  

It's pretty prevalent around these parts

but overall it’s difficult to determine when someone is being facetious. I guess we haven’t had a lot of interaction for you to know how annoyed I get when fans say the cover-2 has been figured out.

"In order to have a winner, the team must have a feeling of unity; every player must put the team first- ahead of personal glory" - motivational sign at Halas Hall.

by propheteer on Sep 16, 2010 4:32 PM CDT up reply actions  

I think one of the reasons the screen pass has not been effective for the Bears in a long time is...

we haven’t had WR’s with this kind of speed across the board that demands attention from the safeties and corners of the opposing team. Also, the LB’s have to cover those short zones because of the RAC potential that Hester, Knox, and DA had shown last year and even in this first game. When the D can’t overload the box on passing downs, the screen should be more open. At that point, one good block or making one tackler miss can get the kind of play that Forte made and both he and Chester Taylor have that ability. You also have to throw in Cutler’s ability to throw the long ball and the defenses can’t take too many chances in coming up to cover.

In the past, our WR’’s didn’t scare anyone and the defenses were set up to stop the run even on third down. All of those lanes were clogged up and the screens went nowhere.

by BearFan611 on Sep 16, 2010 10:43 AM CDT reply actions  

Bears lost a waiver claim to the Rams

for former Giants linebacker Bryan Kehl on Wednesday.

"You win because of the quarterback. We have to get that position stabilized. We're fixated on that." -- Jerry Angelo (12.30.2008)

Jerry Angelo trades for Jay Cutler! (4.2.2009)

by SackMan on Sep 16, 2010 11:07 AM CDT reply actions  

Screens

when ran effectively are a beautiful thing. on top of selling the play, those lineman gotta make sure not to wander too far down field. I’ve seen lineman get flagged on ineligible man down field on that one and it’s such a pain in the ass when it happens.

---AC 00 00 00 - Believe

by mjk83 on Sep 16, 2010 1:05 PM CDT reply actions  

LOL

(I’m disappointed in myself for not mentioning it on Tuesday, but I had WRs on the brain!)

I thought the same thing, when I read it on Tuesday.

I too love the classic screen. It’s one of my favorite plays in football. When ran perfectly, it is beautiful.

by rdent4hof on Sep 16, 2010 1:05 PM CDT reply actions  

Its a perfect play for the type of running backs we have and the Martzffense

Forte and Taylor both seem to excel in broken field runs and the screen is taylor made for that style (no pun intended). I think Martz understands the passing game better than the run, and this is the best way he knows how to utilize running backs. His straight pro set run calls did leave a little something to be desired.

White Sox fans need not apply.

by Bears-Cubs Bulls on Sep 16, 2010 8:40 PM CDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Windy City Gridiron is the best independent site on the internet for breaking news, in-depth analysis, and hardcore discussion about the Chicago Bears

Community Guidelines

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Images-8_small
Why the Offensive Line will be fine.
Images_small
*A Modest Proposal

Recent FanPosts

029_small
Solving a Crisis: Redzone Edition
Windycityflyer_small
SMD's Bottom 5
Images-8_small
Yahoo Fantasy Football Sign-up. Need contact info soon
Small
We may not know DT Nate Collins but the Chicago Bears do.
029_small
Is it time for a contract? Oh no, not another Matt Forte post...
Burlacher2_small
Is Winning Games a Specialty?
Burlacher2_small
Apparently, Defense Wins Championships...
Fox_small
Bad start for AJ Jenkins
Burlacher2_small
What's It Take to Win?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Windycity_small Adam T

189886_210123485665309_100000029768895_888721_5830650_n__1__small Dane Noble

Editors

Sackwatchcutler_small Lester A. Wiltfong Jr.

535321_3734130120778_1501804679_3253247_588486681_n_small David Taylor

Orange_shy_guy_small Steven Schweickert

Capture_small Kev H

Contributing Writers

Lincoln_small Sam Householder

Leprechaun_small Spongie

Polishsausage_small Steve Ronkowski

Icothgmts_small T.J. Shouse

Joe_20mantegna-bill_20swerski_small Superfans

P981d5c2_reasonably_small_small DaveGilbertNFL