WCG Match-Up Post: Grades and Reviews for Week 2
The Bears defense played very inspiring this past Sunday, and for me and many fans who witnessed that beat down the Cowboys put on us last time we played each other made this performance much satisfying. Yes, the Bears gave up 400+ yards, but at the same time they made the Cowboys very one dimensional on offense - only allowing 38 rushing yards for 2.0 yards per carry. Physically and mentally the Bears put a fear into the Cowboys offense, by delivering crushing hits whenever a receiver caught the ball, while also strategically shutting down the big plays Garrett and Romo were looking for most of that game. The Bears defense played very well and this should give them plenty of confidence going into next week's Monday Night game knowing they can shut down a high power offense.
LE Mark Anderson: Grade D
This is becoming a developing problem that's flying under the radar. Anderson has been nonexistent for the past two games, specifically in pass rushing, and this is someone the Bears were counting on to benefit from the acquisition. So far we are seeing the same Anderson from recent years where he's too small to bull rush which results in him getting stonewalled and he just gets pushed out of the play when he is purely speed rushing. He was also absent in the run game as Marinelli used plenty of Idonjie on 1st and 2nd downs. We thought Anderson turned the corner in the final two games of last season, but it looks like he has regressed to his old ways. This should be very concerning for Bears fans, as you don't want to put too much pressure on Peppers.
DT Tommie Harris/Matt Toenia: Grade B+
Tommie was double-teamed for most of this game, but when he wasn't, he was a nonfactor against Kyle Kosier. I will give Tommie a break this time around as going up against pro bowl caliber interior lineman at the same time (center Andre Gurode) is a tall task. The reason this grade is a B is because of the stellar play of Matt Toenia for the second game in a row. Very effective against the run as he did his job plugging up his gap, and also getting a good push inside against some of the best in the business in Kosier and Gurode when pass rushing. The main thing I look for in our defensive tackles is they getting that push to make the QB jittery and uncomfortable in the pocket. Toenia's best play this past Sunday came in the 2nd half where he got into the back field and had the instincts to break up a screen pass. Matt Toenia is making the most of his time when he is in there.
DT Anthony Adams:Grade B+
Adams and Toenia were the catalyst of that run defense that allowed only 38 yards 2.0 yards per carry. In my original WCG Match-Up post, I detailed that the most important match-up was our DTs vs. their guards and I thought both guys did an impressive job against a tough Cowboys interior line. Adams was often plugging up his gaps on the line and getting a significant push against Davis.
RE Julius Peppers: Grade B
Peppers was double-teamed and chipped for most of the game, but still was able to get significant pressure on Romo while also playing against the run very well. I was a little surprised that Lovie played Julius at LE most of the game against Colombo rather than against the unproven Doug Free. I think they should have played Peppers a lot more at his original position RE than at LE for that Sunday.
CB Zachary Bowman and Charles Tillman: Grade B+
Why a B+ plus for the starting corners who gave up 374 passing yards? Because although they did give up a big amount of yards, they never really gave up the big play that Romo was often looking for that day. Playing a soft coverage shell, you are going to give up yards, but it's important for the secondary to tackle well and take advantage of plays when they are there for the taking. The secondary certainly did that this past Sunday.
Nickel back D.J. Moore: Grade B+
Moore's performance last Sunday was what I wanted to see from that nickel back position for quite some time (link). We need a playmaker, a ball-hawk at that position and it looks like for the mean time we found that guy in Moore. Some fans are calling his INTs lucky, but the book on Moore coming out of college was that although he's too small to play on the outside, he's very athletic and plays the ball well. His instincts and athleticism were on display this Sunday when on his second INT, he quickly noticed the ball was inaccurately thrown by Romo and had the presence of mind to leave his guy and hustle over there for the turnover.
68 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Hey I Agree.....
Where the heck has Mark Anderson been?
by Dozjah on Sep 21, 2010 8:28 PM CDT via mobile reply actions
Too high on
Jerry Angelo’s draft board. But that was then, this is now….
If you can't laugh at yourself you must not be very funny.
I remain a pessimistically hopeful Bears fan.
by Just Dave on Sep 21, 2010 9:09 PM CDT up reply actions 2 recs
I'm telling you
No one seems to believe me.
Corey Wootton is the man for the job!
Which is why he WILL be starting in this defense at some point
~>PrettyBoISwagg* ' ~^Ayyyeee^~ BakK PaKk ~_PaKk_~ Boogie
by suckmyditka on Sep 21, 2010 9:52 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
Lol with the way Anderson/Izzy is playing
I may win the wager by week 6
~>PrettyBoISwagg* ' ~^Ayyyeee^~ BakK PaKk ~_PaKk_~ Boogie
does Peppers decide what side he will line up at, or does Lovie?
I believe that sandwich hit in the picture at the head of your post is the one that took Witten out of the game.
"Stay thirsty, my friend."
Where's the rest of this?
Looks like it was cut off somehow…
Moore needs something higher than a B+
I wasn’t a fan of his due to fears of tall receivers out jumping him, but I didn’t really see sim get beat, maybe I didn’t pay enough attention to him, but he didn’t seem to get beat 1 vs 1.
dude has a 43" verticle
Not many recievers gonna out jump him. Idc how short he is.
~>PrettyBoISwagg* ' ~^Ayyyeee^~ BakK PaKk ~_PaKk_~ Boogie
angle. attack. and direction. yes, he can leap, but only if he's in a good place.
just saying.
Five foot three seems to thrive on his misery...
by awfullyquiet on Sep 21, 2010 10:17 PM CDT up reply actions
Last Sunday
He was in a good place… just saying.
Another positive comment on Moore and Tillman
is how Moore was able to keep Roy Williams on his feet long enough for Tillman to come in and punch the ball out.
Definitely a key forced turnover at that point of the game.
o I didn't see you mentioned this or I would of just agreed with you.
"Sorry bro, he Jason Bourned me"- Drama
Honestly
I’m just happy Chris Harris played well.
I was worried about his bad games. Good to see him bouncing back.
BEAR DOWN!!
Tillman had a big strip on Roy Williams
nothing new but anytime Williams is on the wrong side of FAIL it always makes me happy.
"Sorry bro, he Jason Bourned me"- Drama
The defense grades are all too high
When we put up a ton of yards against the Lions people were all over the board saying the Bears would have put up a lot more points but for the turnovers. Now that we are on the other end of the situation we are ignoring the defensive problems that were covered up by the turnovers.
Cowboys are suppost to have an explosive offense
They have a week line but they are pretty stacked everywhere else. I was not high on Dallas but it is hard to deny the talent they have.
"Sorry bro, he Jason Bourned me"- Drama
Once they had the lead
They played more cover 2, keeping the players in front of them. Looking for big hits and turnovers. The front 4 got just enough pressure to make Romo uncomfortable, and the DBs did what was asked of them.
In the 8th grade Mike Ditka won his school's Science Fair with a model of a working volcano. There were 17 other working volcano's made that day, but only one named Mount Ditka.
by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Sep 22, 2010 8:57 AM CDT up reply actions
change the B's to C's and your grades are ok
have to agree with MrPants on this one.
by 62bearsthe best on Sep 22, 2010 12:24 AM CDT reply actions
Bears held an explosive offense to 13 points
I rather them give up 400+ yards then give up a bunch of points.
by Dominique Blanton on Sep 22, 2010 10:40 PM CDT up reply actions
Two interceptions and a big part of a forced fumble to win the game.
What does DJ Moore have to do to earn an A?
—d
I wanted to give him an A but there were times
where his instincts failed him and Romo and the receiver capitalize.
by Dominique Blanton on Sep 23, 2010 12:07 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions
I wanted to give him an A but there were times
where his instincts failed him and Romo and the receiver capitalize.
by Dominique Blanton on Sep 23, 2010 12:13 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions
Defense gave up one offensive td
None in 2nd half for 2nd straight week. Bend don’t break….seems to b working fine to me.
by TheGreatGrabowski on Sep 22, 2010 7:24 AM CDT via mobile reply actions
We're very close on grades Nique and btw, still love this series
I only differ in B’s for Tillman and Bowman, no +’s.
DJ Moore gets a big phat A!
And I’ll say “Weak Sauce” is fortunate to be lumped with Toenia.
+1...
Harris was doubled less than 50% of the snaps he played. I say “Weak Sauce” is the moniker that sticks!
IT'S NOT TOO LATE TO FIRE LOVIE!
Have you watched game tape to back this up or is this just a guesstimate?
Harris was doubled less than 50%
Well, isn't what LeBron did last night the living embodiment of The Secret, leaving millions on the table and turning himself into a hometown villain, all for the sake of winning?
Neil Paine, basketball-reference.com
It is a guestimate...
however, this article can give you some insight into what I believe I am seeing
IT'S NOT TOO LATE TO FIRE LOVIE!
Nice Post
Agree mostly. The D Line was outmatched by the size of the Dallas O Line. Considering that, they played very well I thought.
The role of the Defense is to be disruptive and force mistake by the opposing offense. Match ups are important, but certainly more critical is forcing the offense to change what they want to do. In that area the Bears D did an outstanding job as a unit.
Without Dez Bryant’s punt return, this is is a blowout. Near complete domination by our defensive unit, yards allowed notwithstanding.
by Suffering from Chicago Sports on Sep 22, 2010 9:54 AM CDT reply actions
I know he wasn't part of the original "Match Ups" post
But can we just give Manumaleuna an F for the season thus far?
I agree, in fact we can also give him a "U" to go along with it....
by BearFan611 on Sep 23, 2010 7:41 AM CDT up reply actions 2 recs
Pessimist
Sorry, but these grades are too homerish for me.
Secondary: D
How do you give up 374 yards in the air and get a B+? Miles Austin made Bowman his bitch. Secondary is the weak link in this defense. DJ Moore? The ints were luck. The good thing about those ints is that he was close enough to the play to make those plays. This secondary is going to get throttled week in and week out.
Linebackers: B
Again, the LB corp was all over the place. Good to see. They played the run great and you’ll be hard pressed to find 2 LBs better in coverage than Urlacher and Briggs.
Defensive line: B+
They get a B+ because I gave them an A for the run defense but a C for the pass defense. They didn’t get nearly enough pressure on Romo hence the 374 yards but did just enough to keep him honest. Peppers and Izzy need to be the Ends. Anderson is dung.
Offensive line: C
They started with a F. They couldn’t protect Jay and they couldn’t run block. The adjustments helped them out but they still couldn’t run block and they weren’t being asked to protect Jay for long. He was getting rid of the ball quick. That’s more Jay than the line. I thought they looked like shit.
Wide Receivers/Tight Ends: B+
Hester, Knox, Bennett looked good. Knox is a huge deep threat. Bennett is a great possesion type receiver and Hester can seem to do both. I think it’s a really good combo of receivers. Aroma needs to play more. He’s got the size they need in the redzone. Olsen was great. Not only in the receiving but also the blocking. He’s really coming along with the blocking. He’s still Charmin though.
Running Backs: C
No run game at all. It’s not all their fault but a lot of it is. They balance out the D I was going to give them because of their receiving skills.
Quarterback: A
Jay gets the only A. He could have easily lost his composure out there early but he didn’t. I don’t need to say anymore about him, ya’ll saw the game. He was a machine.
Offense still needs to convert better on 3rd downs (1 for 11) and D needs the secondary to step up. This is a good team and they will be contenders this year if they can continue to pass they way they are and stop the run the way they have been doing.
If the secondary were playing man to man and gave up that amount of yards I would give them a F.
The secondary were in zone coverage for most of the game, and while Romo and his receivers got their yards they never got the big play they were looking for all game. You have to grade this team based off their philosophy which is create turnovers, prevent big plays, and keep them out the end zone. The Bears accomplish all three of those goals.
by Dominique Blanton on Sep 22, 2010 10:56 PM CDT up reply actions
Not really
DJ Moore? The ints were luck.
It’s the zone scheme. Like it or not, the scheme banks on bobbled catches/noncatches to create opportunities for turnovers. The scheme also banks on swarming offensive players that have the ball and basically beat and strip them of possession… DJ Moore worked the scheme to perfection on Sunday.
They weren't luck?
So if the zone scheme requires him to be in a specific spot, then he gets a good grade. But to tell me that the ball happened to pop off Austin after Tillman hit him and bounced right into his hands or that Romo threw the ball a fraction of a second to soon and Witten couldn’t get both hands up in time isn’t luck is wrong. Each time, that ball could have bounced in a different direction making the fact that he was in the right spot irrelevant. I agree, Moore was in a good spot to make the ints but they were still luck. Any tipped ball int is luck.
I dunno, dude.
The one he caught between his legs and kept from hitting the ground (after the hit) was part luck, and part really strong hands. Credit goes to him on that one.
If I did what I love for a living, what would I do in my free time?
Writer at windycitygridiron.com {-/-} http://www.twitter.com/kdoggers
He was around the ball because they are swarming to the ball.
Do you expect him to stand in one spot because the ball was not thrown in his zone. Call it what you want it still counts as an int..
You should try the grape flavored Haterade I think you would like it.
Adrian Pedestrian!! Now that's funny Mr. Bayless...
So
pointing out the Bears’ flaws is hating? I said repeatedly that him being in the right spot was good. Tipped ball ints are luck. There is no way in hell that players are calculating where that ball is going to land after it’s tipped. Grow up.
Every team practices the tip drill
Works on reaction time, hand eye coordination, and catching a wobbly ball.
You can call it luck… but the drill is used to work on the skill of catching a deflected pass.
In the 8th grade Mike Ditka won his school's Science Fair with a model of a working volcano. There were 17 other working volcano's made that day, but only one named Mount Ditka.
by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Sep 22, 2010 2:01 PM CDT up reply actions
I understand that
and I’m not saying that it’s lucky to have a tipped ball be caught for an interception. But when a ball is tipped in the air, there is no telling what direction it goes, how long it stays up in the air, etc. To have a ball tipped right into your hands off a deflection is luck. Both of those instances, that ball could have been tipped straight up in the air, it could have been tipped in front of the receiver, etc. If you drop a football straight down on its nose, it’s going to bounce a different direction almost every time. Same thing with DJ. He can be in that same space at the same time on 10 straight plays and that ball would be tipped differently each time.
Again, I’m not calling DJ Moore lucky. I’m saying that it was luck that the ball happened to be tipped exactly where he was standing.
You can say it's luck that the ball was tipped...
But there is no disagreement anywhere that it was his ball skills that enabled him to come up with the ball on both occasions.
Associate Writer - WindyCityGridiron.com - Artist formerly known as Sklz711
Whatever!! Give it a rest..
You think it’s luck.. Fine. Who cares it is what it is and that is an int..
Adrian Pedestrian!! Now that's funny Mr. Bayless...
alright kids...
ok lets just agree that DJ’s int’s were part luck. I mean he did benefit from be at the right place at the right time where the tip balls were, but you gotta give him credit for having the awareness to catch those balls instead of just going after the receiver all out. not all DB’s get their picks from straight up “skill”, they get some lucky picks every now and then…
in short, ill take “lucky” picks all day…lol
That's all im saying
Thank you rampage. He was in good position but those balls tipped right into his chest and hands. I’m not taking anything away from the guy, just that he benefited from balls being tipped right into his gullet.
Still disagree
happened to pop off Austin after Tillman hit him
Ball in Austin’s hands… Tillman hits Austin… ball comes out… Moore makes the play. So no it wasn’t luck, because that’s the scheme.
Romo threw the ball a fraction of a second to soon and Witten couldn’t get both hands up in time
He threw the ball early because his timing was off… Then the question is raised, Why was his timing off? Is it because the Cowboys don’t practice that play in particular? No, or just very doubtful… I’d say it was because Romo had been pressured for most of the day. In fact, when asked about that interception… Romo said (something along the lines of) it was third down and we knew the like to come fast with their front four on third down. So I rushed the throw a little bit.
Like I said, it’s the scheme. Not luck.
I agree
and I’m not saying anything about him not being in good position. He was. The first pick was a great play by Tillman to pop that ball out and good for Moore for being in the right place. The second pick was a rushed throw by Romo(good job Dline) that Witten was not ready for. If Witten doesn’t get his 1 hand on it, the ball sails right behind him and it’s an incompletion. Witten tips it and it’s tipped directly into Moore’s hands.
Luck ints are still ints but c’mon, they are still luck. Moore wasn’t standing there waiting for a tipped ball int on each play. If he was, he’s the greatest defensive player ever because he can calculate distance and direction of tipped passes and knows exactly when tipped balls are coming.
I believe we will be agreeing to disagree on this one. Lol
I for one, literally do not believe in luck… exception being gambling (in some form). So I come in from a different perspective on this situation, than you.
Regardless, good chat and thanks for keepin’ it respectful!
Agreed
I’m all for good chats and never disrespect unless I get disrespected. You kept it real with me so I kept it real with you. I understand your scheme argument and I agree that the scheme is designed to produce turnovers.
Go Bears and Dent should definitely be in there.
there is a saying
“Chance favors the prepared mind.”
You could also say, “Chance favors the prepared body.”
Luck, probability, or chance…whatever you call it, can be skewed in your favor if you prepare.
"Stay thirsty, my friend."
The harder I work the luckier I get.
If you can't laugh at yourself you must not be very funny.
I remain a pessimistically hopeful Bears fan.
The reality is...
Most int’s are in large part luck. 75% are probably just being at the right place at the right time. The other 25% are great skills for going after the ball.
That being said, Moore was at the right place at the right time and played smart and aware and that is why he came away with two int’s and good yards after the catch.
by I Have Bearsititis on Sep 22, 2010 2:53 PM CDT reply actions

by 
























