Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Odds On Peyton Manning's Next Home Includes Three Teams

Bears only keep 5 wide receivers (or do they?)

When the initial speculation started up here on WCG about the 53 man roster, I thought there was no way the Bears would keep less than six wide receivers.  I even thought there was an outside chance they would keep seven, but only 5...  you gotta be kidding me.  Former Bears inept offensive coordinator Ron Turner kept six wide outs the last couple years, and their new resident offensive genius Mike Martz actually will utilize some 4 WR sets, so how the hell can you argue that Martz will only keep five? 

Then something funny happened the last couple weeks.  Something odd started coming over me, my stubbornness started to subside, and I began to see the five WR light.  I should have seen it all along.

Star-divide

I started to see how the Bears were shifting so much offensively, and realized how they can quickly outflank a defense with an extra blocker/TE/WR in Greg Olsen.  Moving Olsen around so much is something that I think excites Martz.  Yes, I know early on his go to sound bytes were something along the lines of, 'if I wanted an extra receiver I'd just insert an extra receiver' or 'tight ends have to block first', but since being around Olsen more he has seen 1st hand the kind of unique talent he has in him.  He can start him off as an H-Back or as an inline TE, then shift him all around to see how a defense matches up.  If a safety or corner comes up he should have the size advantage, if a linebacker comes over he should have the quickness edge.  Olsen is also good at settling down in space if a defense is running zone.  I think Olsen will have more receptions than any TE has ever had working with Martz.

The wildcard in the passing game will be the running backs.  Matt Forte and Chester Taylor both have the skills to split out wide (a la Marshall Faulk).  And I have a feeling Garrett Wolfe made the roster for something other than his special teams prowess.  Wolfe could shift to receiver in some sets, and I can envision Mad Mike Martz coming out in a three RB package.  Just to give the defense something to think about.  Wolfe can have a career year (more than 31 touches would be a career year) with Martz calling the shots.

Keeping Juaquin Iglesias around on the practice squad gives the Bears some insurance in case someone goes down.  Having that extra guy around that knows the offense, and has had an entire training camp in the O, is very fortunate.  Rookie receiver Greg Mathews also made it back to the practice squad after spending all camp with Chicago.  Mathews has some size (6'3") and could develop in a year or two.  He showed some promise in preseason.

Johnny Knox, Devin Hester, Devin Aromashodu, Rashied Davis, and Earl Bennett will all get their playing time.  Bennett should come on strong once he's fully recovered.  Davis will be a special teams stalwart and I wouldn't be surprised to see him shed his dropapotomous labelAnd between Knox, Hester, and Aromashodu, I wouldn't be surprised to see 2,500 yards.  Add in the reps Olsen and maybe Desmond Clark will get split out, and the reps they'll get with one of the backs split wide, and the Bears won't miss a beat in their vertical passing game.

Even though the Bears carried six receivers the last couple years, come game day, usually only five dressed.  So what are the Bears, and the Martzfense, missing from a personnel standpoint?  Nothing really.  If a couple receivers are injured during a game, and they feel they still need to spread the defense out, they'll simply slide Olsen more to receiver or run formations where a RB is split out.  If a WR is injured for a lengthy amount of time, they have the option to activate one of their practice squad players.

After looking at the current roster, seeing some of the movable parts, thinking back on the inactive 6th WR in years past, seeing the history the Bears have of wide-outs on the practice squad, I should have been on the five WR bandwagon from the start.

Comment 23 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I'm down with this

I think you’ll see a lot of Olsen in red-zone situations. Knox and the rest will eat up the yards down the field, but Olsen will make up the scores.

by Virto on Sep 7, 2010 11:52 AM CDT up reply actions  

Not only Red Zone. Olsen is fast enough

to really make a difference in the flats on third down too. Put the slot or a RB out on one side as a fake and then release Olsen for the conversion.

Sharks have a Week dedicated to Chuck Norris

by Kreutzski on Sep 7, 2010 1:02 PM CDT up reply actions  

I always believed it would be 5 WRs

… With the addition of Olsen.

I love the options that Olsen gives you as being a TE/WR/H-back type of player on offense, but I just wonder how you you pay that going forth and is that a role he is comfortable with on this team. Olsen will more than likely be looking for abig payday next year and a big contract defines your role and place on a team.

With the TE position not being a very prevalent one in terms of receiving, it’s kinda hard to see the Bears paying for a receiving TE in the upcoming offseason.

I think they will experiment with it in the upcoming weeks and use him in various packages and formations, but if it doesn’t show much promise— I still can see the Bears looking to move him before the trade deadline.

Semper Fi
PREDICTION for 2010-2011 NFL Season: "The England Patriots will finish 8-8 plus or minus 1" ~8/13/10 1230p

by ChicagoMarine on Sep 7, 2010 12:03 PM CDT reply actions  

I still don't get where the Olsen contract rubbish is coming from

Olsen has yet to say a word about his contract.

Until the season is under way you can’t say Olsen is a good or bad fit

by Bear Lovin 21 on Sep 7, 2010 4:54 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

I like the cut of your jib sir..

but I have to respectfully disagree. I think this is more about the quality of the 6th WRs available to the Bears than any grand strategy for that matter. I do believe Martz will do many of the things you mention…use a RB (say Wolfe/Forte/Taylor) split wide, or Olsen more like a big WR in goal line situations, or odd-looking sets with 3RBs. But all of that is just Martz being Martz. In truth, Iglesias is insurance, but I think it’s more likely the Bears are eyeballing a cast-off vet WR in the coming week(s). Obviously much of this is predicated on the health of the WR corps, but I see more roster moves ahead before the start of the season. Either way, you have made a cogent point and communicated your unyielding optimism; and for that I applaud you sir!

IT'S NOT TOO LATE TO FIRE LOVIE!

by LostInSTL on Sep 7, 2010 12:21 PM CDT reply actions  

we'll have to wait and see

If they sign a vet as a 6th active receiver then we’ll know I was overthinking it… But I did get the impression that Olsen would spend a lot of time split out from listening to Martz and Olsen

In the 8th grade Mike Ditka won his school's Science Fair with a model of a working volcano. There were 17 other working volcano's made that day, but only one named Mount Ditka.

by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Sep 7, 2010 12:39 PM CDT up reply actions  

I do think you are correct...

for the most part. I just find it hard to believe that Martz et al, are going into the season with 4 healthy WRs, Bennett and Olsen. It seems more unnecessarily dangerous to keep only 5 WRs and 4 RBs, even taking Olsen/RBs into account. Either way, the o-line is the problem that needs fixin’!

IT'S NOT TOO LATE TO FIRE LOVIE!

by LostInSTL on Sep 7, 2010 1:46 PM CDT up reply actions  

I think Iglesias was good enough to fill in that 6th receiver spot.

I think it had more to do about depth elsewhere and special teams. If Iglesias would have performed well in that personal protector position they would have kept 6 WR’s as oppose to 4 RB’s.

by Dominique Blanton on Sep 7, 2010 8:42 PM CDT up reply actions  

I think the Bears will

be just fine on offense and that all the pre and off-season worry is a waste of energy. I get comfort from Martz and Tice being in charge compared to what we have had to deal with in the past. Both of these guys have proven track records for developing players. It is just a matter of how long it will take to do it?
All of our starting recievers have experience so should be able to, by now, execute what they have been learning in pre-season and I do believe Devin Hester (I could actually understand his speach this time!) when he says that they have not revealed the bulk of their offense yet.
I am ready to give the O a few games with optimism until they prove otherwise.

The D on 3rd down and short slant passes still worries me a lot though.

Sharks have a Week dedicated to Chuck Norris

by Kreutzski on Sep 7, 2010 12:58 PM CDT reply actions  

Another Fine Analysis Lester

I have thought all along that Olsen would be used as a hybrid TE/WR. For TE he’s actually on the small side, but for a WR he’s got a huge body and can really run the route get open and most importantly, catch the ball.

I hope your insight into Martz’s mad genius is spot on. This may be one of the few areas where we can outflank our opponents.

by Suffering from Chicago Sports on Sep 7, 2010 1:06 PM CDT reply actions  

Olsen

I considered Olsen a WR too, w/the number of times he’s lined up in the slot. The guy can be a matchup nightmare for opposing DC if they take advantage of his strengths, his size, and speed especially in the seam where all the star tight ends seem to make their catches.

by walterfan34 on Sep 7, 2010 1:50 PM CDT reply actions  

Olsen is a TE in name only

He can’t block, which means he’s a liability inline and in the HB position. Truthfully, he’s a big slot WR disguised as a TE. Your WR pecking order is basically…

1. Hester
2. Knox
3. DevA
4. Olsen
5. Bennett
6. Davis

Though Hester shouldn’t be higher than 4th on that list given his, well, inability at the WR position. Clark is the #1 TE, with Brandon coming in as an extra blocker 99% of the time. With our skill at the RB position, this should be more than adequate for a receiving core. My biggest concern has been and will continue to be the offensive line. The Bears are going to be worthless unless either (a) the line suddenly becomes great or (b) they find a way to minimize the effect of having a bad line (screens, rollouts, etc).

by Doshi on Sep 7, 2010 2:24 PM CDT reply actions  

Dallas Clark, gates, and Gonzalez

Can’t block either
Unless it’s witten no tightened are all around threats
Olsen did through a good block on the 90 yard forte run

by Bear Lovin 21 on Sep 7, 2010 4:58 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

I agree.

Bear Lovin, you made the same good point a couple of days ago in a similar line of comments. All you can really expect from a receiving TE is decent/average blocking ability, and Olsen from the sound of it worked a lot on blocking the last couple of years and has reached this level of, in the words of the great Bill McNeil, “adequatulence.”

by oripunk3485 on Sep 7, 2010 6:42 PM CDT up reply actions  

Hey guys whats with the picture of Olsen????????????

"Serious sport has nothing to do with fair play. It is bound up with hatred, jealousy, boastfulness, disregard of all rules and sadistic pleasure in witnessing violence. In other words, it is war minus the shooting." - George Orwell

by RoyRockNRoll on Sep 7, 2010 2:43 PM CDT reply actions  

He's got an owie?

Semper Fi
PREDICTION for 2010-2011 NFL Season: "The England Patriots will finish 8-8 plus or minus 1" ~8/13/10 1230p

by ChicagoMarine on Sep 7, 2010 3:01 PM CDT up reply actions  

He's crying tears of joy over the trade talks.

Knowing he might be able to get out of the shit hole that Angelo and Lovie have made.

WILDCARD BITCHES!!! YEEEEHHHAAAAA!!!!!

by Acreman20 on Sep 7, 2010 5:09 PM CDT up reply actions  

Wolfe can have a career year

That makes me agree instantly.
Even without that it’s a great article and I like the idea of having multiple weapons rather than one “number 1” receiver.

by DaHamsta on Sep 7, 2010 3:30 PM CDT reply actions  

"Fear makes the Wolfe bigger than he is."

Fear the Wolfe.

"More cowbell" - Bruce Dickinson; "More bell cow" - Lovie Smith

by Pete Dixon on Sep 7, 2010 4:34 PM CDT up reply actions  

5 wides 6 wides

They have the players to be playoff bound. Do they have the personality and the attitude toachieve this? The head coach leaves much to be desired.

by Bob Manganiello on Sep 7, 2010 4:02 PM CDT reply actions  

Now this is just crazy talk.

"More cowbell" - Bruce Dickinson; "More bell cow" - Lovie Smith

by Pete Dixon on Sep 7, 2010 4:06 PM CDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Windy City Gridiron is the best independent site on the internet for breaking news, in-depth analysis, and hardcore discussion about the Chicago Bears

Community Guidelines

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Windycity_small Adam T

189886_210123485665309_100000029768895_888721_5830650_n__1__small Dane Noble

Editors

Sackwatchcutler_small Lester A. Wiltfong Jr.

Orange_shy_guy_small Steven Schweickert

Capture_small Kev H

Contributing Writers

Lincoln_small Sam Householder

Leprechaun_small Spongie

Polishsausage_small Steve Ronkowski

Cat_bonnet_small Pete Dixon

Icothgmts_small T.J. Shouse