Watch for Bears use of Cover 3 against the Seahawks
The last couple of weeks I've heard some things on Chicago sports radio that caught my ear. (I don't remember which station, nor which guest expert said it) The expert spoke of the Bears probably being the best team in the league at disguising their coverages. This I did not know. Every team uses a multitude of coverages, different mixtures of zone or man, or a combination of the two. And when you're a team that runs the Tampa 2 as their base defense, you need to give enough different looks to keep opposing quarterbacks honest.
The second thing that piqued my interest (I'm still not 100% sure, but I think it was Tim Hasselbeck that said this) was that this Bears team runs about as much Cover 3 as they do Cover 2. This I did not know either. I've looked at the Tampa/Cover 2 stuff Chicago has done before, but this week I'll try my best to explain the Cover 3.

The variation above is the Cover 3 in it's most basic form as run by a base 4-3 defense. The middle third is covered by the free safety, with the other two thirds taken by the corners. The strong safety can play up tight in run support, then if he reads a pass it's a quick shuffle to his curl/flat zone. The other 3 underneath zones would be manned by the three linebackers if the Bears are in base personnel. The ease of the Bears transitioning from an eight in the box strong run defense look to the Cover 3 is a probably a big reason they run this zone as much as they do. Matt Bowen of the Chicago Tribune and the National Football Post does an outstanding and detailed job in breaking down the Cover 3 from an eight in the box look right here.
The Bears are just as likely to run the Cover 3 from their nickle package. This would give them some flexibility in disguising the look. The Bears like to blitz SS Danieal Manning and nickle back D.J. Moore from time to time, so by bluffing a blitz, either would be in prime position to drop off into their curl/flat zone.
The 3 deep 4 under isn't the only variation of the Cover 3 the Bears could run. Blitzing a defender and playing 3 deep 3 under is a possibility. Playing 3 deep 3 under with 1 DB assigned man to man is another, and with as big a threat Seattle's Mike Williams posed last time out I could see this the Bears showing this on occasion.
Nothing the Bears will run is going to confuse the 35 year old, 12 year veteran, Matt Hasselbeck. He's seen it all. It's how good they can disguise what scheme they're getting into that will tell the tale when Chicago's on D. Hasselbeck may have turned back the clock against the Saints last weekend, but an angry Bears defense is capable of playing on another level. Hasselbeck had fluid drained from his hip last week, he had a bulky wrap on his non throwing hand, and he hasn't put together a good season since 2007. What the Bears will have to do is cause him to take that extra second to decipher the defenders drops, and if the Bears front four is playing as angry as I expect them to be, it could be a rough afternoon for the Seahawk offense.
17 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Diagrams.
Terminology. Stop giving us legitimacy.
If I did what I love for a living, what would I do in my free time?
Writer at windycitygridiron.com {-/-} http://www.twitter.com/kdoggers
The saints got one sack on Hasselback..
He plays tentatively after a hit or two because.. well.. he’s old and has understandable PTSD from playing in the league this long and getting sacked over 300 times. Also, the seahawks lived off of big plays vs the saints, with several pass plays in the 20-40 yard range converted. The seahawks are also a bit exposed because Lynch is not a pass threat, though Forsett is when he’s in there. If just the Bears defense plays the full 60 minutes and the DB’s moderately do there job, that alone should be enough to win. Sack Hassalback 3-4 times and keep him running around, and the bears should have this. Sack him zero times and have the dline not show up like last time (the enitre front including reserves COMBINED for 9 tackles/assists and not much else in that game) and it’s going to be a nailbiter.
by DisCUBbobulated on Jan 13, 2011 11:36 AM CST reply actions
i'm learning
Wilt – thanks for your constant information re the x’s and o’s of the game. i am learning a lot from this.
i remember reading somewhere about the Bears being adept at disguising coverages but i don’t understand enough to know this for sure myself.
i do know enough to agree that an angry Bears front four will wreak havoc on ’beck and there be the key to the game, or one of them
"I am a sinner who does not expect forgiveness. But I am not a government official." - Francis Wolcott
Bears being adept at disguising coverage.
You know how you see 8 guys on the line sometimes? and some of them drop back, and then run back forward, and then drop back as the ball is snapped?
That’s part of it. The other part is watching where the safeties stand, and how they can move around the field sometimes, play deep, shallow, and move pre-snap. Watching the back 4(5) move and position is as important for a QB to read as the front 7.
Five foot three seems to thrive on his misery...
by awfullyquiet on Jan 13, 2011 3:35 PM CST up reply actions
Learning while at school? An article that actually teaches?
I must post something inane before this goes too far…..

There, now I’m better….
If you can't laugh at yourself you must not be very funny.
I remain a pessimistically hopeful Bears fan.
our new game thread mascot?
yikes!
"I am a sinner who does not expect forgiveness. But I am not a government official." - Francis Wolcott
Is that Gene Simmons?
When the world slips you a Jeffrey, stroke a furry wall.
- Aldous Snow
by Ditkavsworld on Jan 13, 2011 2:43 PM CST up reply actions
This is what concerns me about Sunday...
that the Bears go to a ton of zone coverage and play off the WRs. Then the Seahawks will simply run out of single back formations or chew up a ton of yards underneath with Hasselbeck reading the hots and throwing slants/seams and skinny posts. The big key this weekend will be the Bears getting pressure without blitzing. If they can drop 7 into coverage and still get pressure, then the Seahawks are doomed. But if the Bears simply play read and react (I call it catch and release), then the Seahawks will just dink and dunk all day and keep the Bears offense on the sidelines. If the Seahawks get a lead (and eat up a ton of clock), the Bears will abandon the run and go pass crazy Martzfence.
I'd prefer not to have Lovie return...Unless we win the SB baby!!!!
"There's a fine line between stupid, and clever!"
"I am serious... and don't call me Shirley." Leslie Nielson 1926-2010
Dinking and Dunking isn't bad
As long as you can force enough inc.’s to get the 3 and out…
But yeah, I completely agree. Need to get pressure. Pressure. Pressure and more pressure.
Briggs tackling may indeed give Beast Mode some pause…. or hurt.
Five foot three seems to thrive on his misery...
by awfullyquiet on Jan 13, 2011 4:00 PM CST up reply actions
Ture...
I just hate watching the 15 yard cushion that allows the other team’s offense to throw 7 yard outs all day long. The Bears DBs are just not very good and Manning gets caught out of position too often to do anything other than play off coverage and zone schemes. It’s the lack of flexibility/creativity in coverages that makes them so vulnerable to competent vet QBs.
I'd prefer not to have Lovie return...Unless we win the SB baby!!!!
"There's a fine line between stupid, and clever!"
"I am serious... and don't call me Shirley." Leslie Nielson 1926-2010
Ture or True what's the difference...!
I'd prefer not to have Lovie return...Unless we win the SB baby!!!!
"There's a fine line between stupid, and clever!"
"I am serious... and don't call me Shirley." Leslie Nielson 1926-2010
Very Ture.
:D
The DB’s definitely need to upgrade, but with Manning, I think he’s doing a fine job, but much is on the limitations of the CB’s.
Five foot three seems to thrive on his misery...
by awfullyquiet on Jan 14, 2011 11:57 AM CST up reply actions
I think that still plays into the Bears' favor, though.
There’s a chance the Seahawks can translate that soft zone into points, and play well on defense/ST and keep it a game. But they’re still vulnerable to turnovers, and prolonged drives increase the chances of one occurring.
by jacobstevens on Jan 13, 2011 6:57 PM CST up reply actions
By the way
The pass to Greg Jennings in the Packer game was against Cover 3. I believe it was Bowman was playing outside of the numbers, forcing Greg inside where Manning can break from the center of field in time to disrupt the post routes, while Bowman was able to cover the curl and out routes. On the play, Manning was cheating left because A-Rod was looking left the whole time, so Manning was out of place to respond and A-Rod makes what is a no-look pass based on the coverage he saw.
The other Cover-3 play that I recall the Bears playing was Week 1, CJs no-TD Catch, where same thing above. Bowman was playing outside the receiver, taking away the out and corner routes, while Manning was safety over the middle that was taking away the tight end seam route. The difference with this one is Shaun Hill was staring down CJ, as opposed to A-Rod not looking his way at all.
Bears. Bulls. White Sox.

by 





















