Does Martz Need to Go?
Before I begin, let me say I'm not sure whether I want Martz to come back or not. On the one hand, I think it is important for a QB and offense to have some measure of continuity in leadership and playbook. On the other hand, it's important to have a coordinator that will work with the strengths of the personnel, and is effective as a playcaller.
I was never in favor of hiring Martz. The Martz offense requires a quarterback that can stay in the pocket, quickly diagnose plays, and make accurate throws. It requires receivers that run precise routes. It requires an offensive line that can hold blocks long enough to allow 7 step drops. It de-emphasizes the run game.
We have an inaccurate qb whose strength is a strong, albeit inaccurate arm, and enough mobility and improvisational skills to overcome his inaccuracy and poor mechanics. We have a young wr corps that doesn't always run crisp routes or learn quickly. We have a offensive line that can't hold blocks. The best player we have on offense is our running back.
Poor fit notwithstanding, I gave Martz the benefit of the doubt, because I saw everywhere the stats showing the turnarounds he's had with much worse QBs.
Let's take a look at the Bears' stat progressions from 2009 to 2010:
2009 2010
Total Offense YPG (rank) 310 (23rd) 289 (30th)
Passing Offense YPG 213 (17th) 188 (28th)
Rushing Offense YPG 93 (29th) 101 (22nd)
So we've had a small improvement in rushing offense, but our total offense and our passing offense are worse, and both are near Terry Shea levels. These numbers are improvements since the bye week, when Martz was reportedly dressed down by Lovie and ordered to change his gameplan.
Further, let's look at Martz's player evaluation. This off-season we had "the big 3" signings. Martz obviously had nothing to do with Peppers, but reportedly both Chester Taylor and Shamu were hand-picked by Martz. Both those guys have been disasters, and expensive disasters at that. Martz's other hand-picked talent was Todd Collins, and he was reportedly the one who pushed Collins back up the depth chart despite the collosally bad performance against Carolina.
I don't have time to go in to all the in-game problems, but I'll touch on a few:
Our offense game plan in the first half Sunday, as well as the entire game week 17, was terrible.
Earl Bennet should never run an end-around, let alone in the most critical play of the season.
Calling time-outs as a play is being snapped that would've given us a first down in a huge situation was a killer--twice. Calling stupid plays after the time-out compounded the problem.
In short, nothing other than continuity would make me want to keep Martz around. He is not effective, he makes poor personnel choices (whither Aromashadu), and he makes poor decisions in-game.
I would float Jeremy Bates as a possible successor. Cutler seems to like him, and he's had success with him in the past.
This FanPost was written by a Windy City Gridiron member, and does not necessarily reflect the ideas or opinions of its staff or community.
165 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
No.
Martz needs to stay.
His offense is notoriously complex, and there’s no way someone in just the first year can even begin to comprehend it. If the majority of the players remain the same, and Martz has another full offseason to drill the system into people, it could become crazy good.
Why risk bringing in ANOTHER system, when Cutler is already on his 3rd in 3 years?
by Virto on Jan 25, 2011 1:50 PM CST reply actions 3 recs
Thank you for posting what I was gonna post !
" Everyone has a plan 'till they get punched in the mouth. " ~
Mike Tyson
by MidWayMonster54 on Jan 25, 2011 1:55 PM CST up reply actions
The reason
is that every other time Martz has coached the offense, there has been a dramatic improvement in offensive performance. A huge improvement.
But here, the offense got worse. Why?
In my opinion it’s because he was a poor fit for the personnel here as outlined above, and he has thus far been unable to adjust his system to fit the team’s strengths. I think that’s because his system is the opposite of what Jay, the receivers, and the line are suited to do, and no amount of waiting for the offense to “sink in” is going to change that.
I don’t want Jay to go through a new coordinator every year, but I also don’t want to stick with the wrong coordinator any longer than we need to.
DEJESUS!!!
by tomas21 on Jan 25, 2011 2:27 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
It's too late
They already chose him, so for the sake of continuity for your most important offensive player you keep him. The O-line was awful, the WRs blah, but the running game improved mightily in the second half of the season. Keep him because it’s their best and only option.
"The problem isn't that people aren't smart, it's that some folks have an attention span of about seven days. Look at the broader picture and you'll always be smarter." - Bill Barnwell of F.O. on why the media picks playoff winners on Monday.
Plus if Martz will do anything its improve his playbook
He already introduced a few new roll-outs and plays featuring Olsen going down the seem in the later part of the season. Also, they ran the ball alot more as well as a bunch of new screens. His offense is evolving along with these players, keep him here and just let the Offense develop.
Erik Duerrwaecter
by Erik Christopher Duerrwaechter on Jan 25, 2011 8:19 PM CST up reply actions
The end around pissed me off
but after thinking for a while. Keep him
(Sing song)...Everybody Hates Rondo...
Can we green this?
In one year cutler put up 23 tds in 14.5 games and Forte ran for nearly 1100 yards behind a god awful liine.
Martz now knows who can do what. i.e. get greg olsen the damn ball.
Year 2 Cutler tops 30 tds passing mark it.
Guns dont kill people. Brian Urlacher kills people.
by Bear Lovin 21 on Jan 25, 2011 11:20 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
And the Bears won 11 games and went to the NFC Championship and almost won, something went right other than the Defense.
Many that live deserve death. And some die that deserve life. Can you give it to them? Then be not too eager to deal out death in the name of justice, fearing for your own safety. Even the wise cannot see all ends.- JRR Tolkien
There are not enough letters in the word "no" to adequately express the "no-ness" of my response.
And Virto said it rather succinctly.
i say leave Lovie and JA until after next season
and i mean the staff as well. Lovies contract is up next year and lets see what he can do w/ another year. Let JA try to see if he can put a draft together if his job depends on it. I see the only 2 people possible worth leaving could be Rod and Tice(I beleive Tice would be interviewed for a HC) But for next season let us see how it turns out. BEAR DOWN EVERYONE!!!!!!!!!!!!!
No
Jay Cutler needs to stay in a system that has definately helped to improve his play. Having yet another offense to learn will only harm Cutler as well as everybody on this team.
Erik Duerrwaecter
by Erik Christopher Duerrwaechter on Jan 25, 2011 2:36 PM CST reply actions
Less worried about yards
Its not a fair gauge for an offense.
Try points per game and time of possession, I like those much better, in general. We had the best field position in the NFL this year, so yards weren’t easy to come by.
Chicago was 21st in points (19th in 2009), but actually scored more (20.9 per game, as opposed to 20.4 per game) by one whole touchdown…Except we had 3 ST scores this year, as opposed to 1 last year, so we scored 1 less TD total this year compared to last. (No defensive TDs, proof we need some more speed and youth at the DB positions.)
I have concerns, concerns regarding our Offensive Line and the lack of physicality from the receiver position…
I am not 100% into Martz, but I don’t know that he was such a failure you have to can him after 1 year. I know Cutler could sure use the work on footwork, quick reads, and pocket passing, so maybe he becomes a better QB in a system that emphasizes some things he struggles with.
Corey Wootton, the Favre Slayer.
No dfensive tds?
DJ Moore would like to have a word with you
Devin Hester. 14 Koff/Preturn TDs in 5 seasons.
Didn't you hear?
It was a lucky play, so it didn’t count for anything.
by Steven Schweickert on Jan 25, 2011 10:34 PM CST up reply actions
lol...
Good point…I wonder why the stat sheet is messed up on ESPN/CBS.
and SJS nailed it, total luck.
Corey Wootton, the Favre Slayer.
by Brendan Hess on Jan 28, 2011 11:38 AM CST up reply actions
Give it a rest...
The Bears made it to the NFC Championship! Didn’t they? The Bears should be looking at additions and youth, not looking to rebuild. A couple lineman, some youth at linebacker, some help in the secondary, and a big bodied receiver should be the focus…
Good idea, but as far as the first rounder is concerned
The DT from Illnois is the player I believe would help the team most.
Erik Duerrwaecter
by Erik Christopher Duerrwaechter on Jan 25, 2011 3:26 PM CST up reply actions
Are you being sarcastic or serious?
I just dont think taking a DT in the first round makes sense. If its dump Tommie Harris and take a DT in the 1st then I say keep Tommie and spend the draft pick on the Oline or at CB. Harris aint winning any probowl berths but he is competent, drafting on the Dline just sounds like more JA thinking.
But maybe I am wrong, how good is this guy from Illinois?
White Sox fans need not apply.
by Bears-Cubs Bulls on Jan 25, 2011 3:30 PM CST up reply actions
Corey Liuget
And he is a BEAST!!! He is bigger than Tommie Harris (6-3 300-310 pounds) and far more powerful. But best of all he is probably more explosive than Suh, he gets off the ball FAST.
Erik Duerrwaecter
by Erik Christopher Duerrwaechter on Jan 25, 2011 3:50 PM CST up reply actions
We also have an eye for talent my friend
Erik Duerrwaecter
by Erik Christopher Duerrwaechter on Jan 25, 2011 9:09 PM CST up reply actions
AMEN
Erik Duerrwaecter
by Erik Christopher Duerrwaechter on Jan 26, 2011 7:24 PM CST up reply actions
Actually my good friend Akeem Spence plays DT for them
And following him led me to watching Liuget. Considering the avaliable O-Lineman in FA (Mankins anyone?) as well as DBs (ASOMUGHA!!) a DT like Liuget does make the most sense in the draft. Just sign the best avaliable experiance players to fill your most crucial needs, then draft what you cant fill.
Erik Duerrwaecter
by Erik Christopher Duerrwaechter on Jan 26, 2011 7:23 PM CST up reply actions
I think we need more than 1 OL and we need a big WR
I wouldn’t have a problem drafting Liuget, but I don’t think DT is such a gaping hole or Liuget is such a special talent that we have to get him.
There are alot of larger options at WR that appear to be avaliable
I mentioned Mankins to say that he leads the pack of a rather deep pool of O-Lineman becoming avaliable. And IMO Liuget is a special talent at DT that we simply cant overlook. DT needs improvement bottom line.
Erik Duerrwaecter
by Erik Christopher Duerrwaechter on Jan 27, 2011 5:01 PM CST up reply actions
wait
he is probably more explosive than Suh
I WANT HIM!
Guns dont kill people. Brian Urlacher kills people.
by Bear Lovin 21 on Jan 27, 2011 6:37 PM CST up reply actions
Me too!!!
Erik Duerrwaecter
by Erik Christopher Duerrwaechter on Jan 28, 2011 7:08 PM CST up reply actions
It makes perfect sense to sign O-Lineman in FA and then drafting a DT in the first.
Especially when Mankins is avaliable
Erik Duerrwaecter
by Erik Christopher Duerrwaechter on Jan 25, 2011 3:54 PM CST up reply actions
If we go defense early I thought an impact CB would make more sense
Are we ok with Jennings who had his ups and downs, looked great in a few games and not so good in others and is his still under contract?
if this guy is as good as Suh will he be there at 29th or 30th?
White Sox fans need not apply.
by Bears-Cubs Bulls on Jan 25, 2011 4:22 PM CST up reply actions
Doubtable.
Liuget is dominating at times; he was ripping apart Baylor’s offensive line in the Texas Bowl. That being said, if I recall right, one of the big issues was consistency.
by Steven Schweickert on Jan 25, 2011 4:43 PM CST up reply actions
He has had problems with consistancy, but he still progressed throughout the season
I believe the Corners can be adressed either by free agency or by the middle rounds of the draft. This years draft is somewhat deep in DBs from what I am told. Anyways back to Liuget, Suh also had consistancy problems in college, all Liuget needs is a great coach who will get the most out of him, Hot Rod is perhaps the finnest D-Line coach in the league. Could you imagine Liuget and Wilfork in the interior with Peppers and Idonije and Wooton off the edges? That would just send QBs into early retirements.
Erik Duerrwaecter
by Erik Christopher Duerrwaechter on Jan 25, 2011 4:50 PM CST up reply actions
Which is why he'll be gone by 29/30.
by Steven Schweickert on Jan 25, 2011 4:57 PM CST up reply actions
Not necessarily
The majority of teams before the Bears will be searching for Offensive help, and in addition there are a ton of defensive players that appear to be taken before Liuget, each year has their surprizes. Besides, we may actually trade up this year. Honestly the number 1 sought after position in this year’s draft will be QBs IMO. A ton of reaches will be made.
Erik Duerrwaecter
by Erik Christopher Duerrwaechter on Jan 25, 2011 5:01 PM CST up reply actions
And Liuget is 25 in Scouts Inc's 32...
You may be right there.
But in that case, and if you feel most of the other teams will be reaching for offense… Wouldn’t you sit on your 30 for a DT/defense? Not sure what the benefit is to trade up to get guys that aren’t going off the board.
by Steven Schweickert on Jan 25, 2011 5:09 PM CST up reply actions
Coin the term MAY
It all depends on how the draft goes before our selection. If there is suddenly a rush on D-Lineman then thats when you would want to trade up. If not, and if all else is taken care of, then just sit back, relax, and make the best choice.
Erik Duerrwaecter
by Erik Christopher Duerrwaechter on Jan 25, 2011 5:28 PM CST up reply actions
Hell No!
Stop switching systems! Nobody on offense will develop if we keep changing OCs.
by boondock_saint812 on Jan 25, 2011 3:12 PM CST reply actions
I have been having this discussion with myself for the past 48 hours
And can find no good reason to change. Whe I think about a change I want to see someone who will do better than Martz and I can’t think of anyone out there that is ready to step in and show better results. I think I am coming down on the side of keep him around for another season and give the offense a chance to show what it can do with a whole offseason to digest the offense. I think its going to be a situation where guys will come into mini camp ready to go rather than having to spend 3 preseason games just learning new route trees and the play names. Lets give old Mike the benefit of the doubt based on a NFCCG berth with a team not sporting too many offensive all stars.
A revamped Offensive line (not news to anyone who hangs around here) and a couple of tall receivers, I am talking taller than 6’ 3" and a quick sure handed white guy receiver in the spirit of Tom Waddle and Wes Welker.
Our schedule looks tough with the Falcons, Chargers, Chiefs, Tampa, Saints, Eagles. Also the Raiders in Oakland as well as the Division schedule next season looks tough so we need continuity. The good news is the Pack play alot of these tough teams as well.
White Sox fans need not apply.
by Bears-Cubs Bulls on Jan 25, 2011 3:27 PM CST reply actions
It's easy to wonder if the Martzfense is the right one for Cutler,
but we also have to keep a couple things in mind:
One, Cutler actually helped the team interview Martz. They met up in a restaurant, and talked about offensive philosophy, and it went so well, they even started drawing up plays together into the wee hours of the night. A few days later, martz was offered a contract by the team.
Two, Cutler said a few weeks ago that he loved the offense, and hoped to play the rest of his career in it. He is a very, very intelligent QB, and undoubtedly the complexities and nuances are right up Cutler’s alley.
I would venture a guess that Mike Martz’s offense might work with one, maybe two QBs in the league… and my opinion is that Cutler is one of them. We’ve got a couple good WRs that fit Martz’s mold (speedsters), we’ve got a couple good TEs, and a couple good RBs. Once we get the OL addressed, even if we can simply put together an average OL, then we are suddenly in very good shape.
Sure, it’d be sexy to add a big target WR, but just give the guy some protection, and let this system keep getting rolled out and digested by everyone, and I think we’d be in good shape offensively.
Minimum, give Martz another year. See where he and Tice can take us offensively next year.
To me, the big/tall receiver thing is not as important as someone stronger.
He could be 6-1" or 6-2", as long as he can fight for catches, fight thru press coverage, and has some hops too. Knox & Hester just don’t do that.
by Mike Mueller on Jan 25, 2011 4:48 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Yep
If you’re a starting WR then your job is to fight for the damn ball no matter how small or big you are.
"The problem isn't that people aren't smart, it's that some folks have an attention span of about seven days. Look at the broader picture and you'll always be smarter." - Bill Barnwell of F.O. on why the media picks playoff winners on Monday.
He'd be perfect
and would’ve cost an arm and a leg.
"The problem isn't that people aren't smart, it's that some folks have an attention span of about seven days. Look at the broader picture and you'll always be smarter." - Bill Barnwell of F.O. on why the media picks playoff winners on Monday.
My writeup on free agent WRs.
James Jones 6’ 1" 208, 26 yrs old
Jacoby Jones 6’2" 210, 26
Legedu Naanee 6’2" 220, 27
by Mike Mueller on Jan 26, 2011 8:15 AM CST up reply actions
Nice
I like JJ or MSW the best.
"The problem isn't that people aren't smart, it's that some folks have an attention span of about seven days. Look at the broader picture and you'll always be smarter." - Bill Barnwell of F.O. on why the media picks playoff winners on Monday.
Floyd, Sims-Walker, & Jackson will probably cost a fortune.
JJ1, JJ2, and Naanee are more for your bargain shoppers. So right up Halas Halls alley after the last 2 years of free agent binging.
The CBA clouds all FA spending though. There’s NO FA signings until there’s a new CBA. There will be a draft no matter what though. If the CBA negotiations drag out, the draft will occur and teams will fill their needs through draft picks. Then hit FA after. It’s always been the reverse where teams fill holes through FA first, then go to the draft. If a bunch of WR hungry teams spend high draft picks on receivers, then all the FA WR prices will drop. If the opposite occurs, then mediocre WRs could get huge deals.
by Mike Mueller on Jan 26, 2011 9:43 AM CST up reply actions
Everyone is mentioning the March 3rd deadline as when a deal will probably occur.
I’m skeptical since the draft is already scheduled and WILL happen no matter what. I could definitely see the owners waiting out the union another 2 months to get a better deal. By doing so, they are sacrificing free agency (which will just be postponed until after the draft, which could benefit owners anyway because teams will fill needs with draft picks thus lowering demand for free agents.)
Another factor which will lower demand is that all those 4-year vested players who did NOT hit FA last season because of the 6-year rule put in for the uncapped season will now be free agents. Also, there will be a new crop of 4-year players hitting FA as well. Basically the pool of free agents will be larger than years past. Plus teams will start to fill their needs with draft picks first. All this will lead to lower prices for the owners.
They will also be sacrificing mini-camps, and OTAs which in the big picture can be somewhat made up, but otherwise to the owners do not mean as much as their bottom line. I predict a lockout to occur, and then a deal reached after the draft in late April or in May.
by Mike Mueller on Jan 26, 2011 9:53 AM CST up reply actions
That's going to be strange
I just hope there is a free-agency. You think Floyd and MSM will cost a fortune? Definitely Jackson, but the other Charger is 29 and never has been an impact player.
"The problem isn't that people aren't smart, it's that some folks have an attention span of about seven days. Look at the broader picture and you'll always be smarter." - Bill Barnwell of F.O. on why the media picks playoff winners on Monday.
All are solid targets that seem as good fits for the Martzfence
You may even see a trade or two for a WR come on the table.
Erik Duerrwaecter
by Erik Christopher Duerrwaechter on Jan 27, 2011 5:02 PM CST up reply actions
Good points
Cutler actually improved a lot numbers wise – over last year. His rating was 90 heading into the finale at Green Bay. If he can improve as much next year, he could be headed to another Pro Bowl, and we should be back in the playoffs.
Cutler posted career bests in passer rating (86.3 to 86) and also tied his best TD/Int ratio (23/16 to 25/18)
Another year in the system and Im seeing a Super Bowl apperance. We got to the NFC Championship this year so who knows? Super Bowl 46 champs has a ring to it.
Erik Duerrwaecter
by Erik Christopher Duerrwaechter on Jan 27, 2011 5:06 PM CST up reply actions
Let's just make it a SB victory instead
If they make it again, they’re winning it!
"The problem isn't that people aren't smart, it's that some folks have an attention span of about seven days. Look at the broader picture and you'll always be smarter." - Bill Barnwell of F.O. on why the media picks playoff winners on Monday.
Okay
apperance VICTORY BEAR DOWN!!
Erik Duerrwaecter
by Erik Christopher Duerrwaechter on Jan 28, 2011 7:10 PM CST up reply actions
No.
Continuity is sorely needed. Period.
I’m with you on that end around call. But I’m also pretty sure we’d all be calling Martz a genius if it worked.
No
If you go in the bathroom, turn off the lights, and say "Da Coach" 5 times while facing the mirror... Ditka will appear and slap the wussy right out of you.
by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Jan 25, 2011 4:12 PM CST reply actions
No
O-line fix, and we will be fineeeeeee
"Welcome to the place where I lazily threaten people and then everyone laughs."
- Kev H
No
One of the problems with the Chicago Bears drafting in the past is that we haven’t had truly competent assistant coaches to assist in draft evaluations (in my opinion), let alone the proper continuity among the staff to enable players suited to a particular scheme to excel long-term.
Jerry Angelo has to rely on his scouts, to be sure, but then he had to rely on guys like Ron Turner to evaluate the dozens of guys the scouts identified throughout the country.
This is one reason that I feel more hopeful for the Bears’ drafting going forward – guys like Mike Martz and Mike Tice putting potential draft picks through the paces to find the right fit for the organization AND the scheme. Let Martz check out some WRs and another backup QB (behind Hanie), and let Tice evaluate some offensive lineman. If he can make a 6th-rounder into a starter, he should be able to identify some damn good 1st – 4th rounders to make even better contributions. Allow Marinelli to run a bunch of DBs back and forth across the complex to find the ones with the best motors.
Jeremy Bates? Oh geez, no.
by Sweetness Lives On on Jan 25, 2011 4:54 PM CST reply actions
Great point
Martz (and Tice) along with Marinelli are all good when it comes to evaluating talent on their respective sides of the ball.
Erik Duerrwaecter
by Erik Christopher Duerrwaechter on Jan 25, 2011 4:57 PM CST up reply actions
Except for
Manu, Chester Taylor and Todd Collins—essentially all of Martz’s additions this year have been awful.
DEJESUS!!!
In free agency perhaps
Martz simply wanted players that were familiar with his system, which there weren’t too many out there to begin with. Martz especially felt more comfortable with a vet as a back-up for Cutler (although Todd wasn’t exactly the right choice). But after seeing Hanie play admirably sunday, he probably sees fit to go with him instead, and axe Todd Collins. Draft wise, on the other hand, he made some rather good choices for example Calvin Johnson I believe was one of his selections. He knows talent, and he knows his system, so lets allow him to make the choices on skill players and have Tice handle the O-Linemen.
Erik Duerrwaecter
by Erik Christopher Duerrwaechter on Jan 25, 2011 5:34 PM CST up reply actions
you have to take into account
what Collins and Manu brought to the team as far as helping teach the system… and Manu gets a bad rap, his blocking was ok, nothing spectacular, but he was all right. Don’t judge his play vs his earnings
If you go in the bathroom, turn off the lights, and say "Da Coach" 5 times while facing the mirror... Ditka will appear and slap the wussy right out of you.
by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Jan 25, 2011 7:30 PM CST up reply actions
Yup
Really a move I expect the Bears to make is to sign another mammoth TE, a young one perhaps in the draft to learn the system and to eventually replace Manu. Who knows, perhaps they could move Lance Louis back to TE. He was one back in college, might be a solid move. 6-3 305 would be an even bigger problem for
D-Ends to contend with!
Erik Duerrwaecter
by Erik Christopher Duerrwaechter on Jan 25, 2011 8:13 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
100%
Lance Louis back to TE to replace Manu. Or someone like Lee Smith in the 5th-6th round.
Corey Wootton, the Favre Slayer.
by Brendan Hess on Jan 28, 2011 11:41 AM CST up reply actions
Considering that there are signs of Jerry going after big named O-Lineman in FA
It would better serve his career. Lance Louis also has some nastyness to him too.
Erik Duerrwaecter
by Erik Christopher Duerrwaechter on Jan 28, 2011 7:12 PM CST up reply actions
Lets get two O-linemen ...
… so Jay can see his passes get completed ! Say Mankins & Nicks ?
" Everyone has a plan 'till they get punched in the mouth. " ~
Mike Tyson
by MidWayMonster54 on Jan 30, 2011 3:23 AM CST up reply actions
Mankins and Nicks
I can see Angelo somehow getting both.
Erik Duerrwaecter
by Erik Christopher Duerrwaechter on Jan 30, 2011 11:36 AM CST up reply actions
5 years and $2 million/year is still a lot of years and coinage for Manu to teach the system
I guess we have to give Martz and the system time – it’s just that.. well.. do we want to try the same Martz system next year that we did at the start of this year? If not, then why hire Martz to do something different from what he built is reputation on? Perhaps what didn’t click in 2010 will in 2011. I hope so, because there’s a lot invested in that hope.
by DisCUBbobulated on Jan 26, 2011 3:37 PM CST up reply actions
Well its pretty complicated to explain
We wanted a heavy pass system unique to Chicago, but early on and at times during the year Martz realized that his system is easy to defend as long as the recievers arn’t physical and when the QB is constantly harrassed. So, he modified his playbook during the byes and presto changeo we had an effective and somewhat dangerous offense. He is still making revisions to his playbook as we speak so who knows what the Offense will look like next season. He is Mad Mike after all.
Erik Duerrwaecter
by Erik Christopher Duerrwaechter on Jan 26, 2011 7:29 PM CST up reply actions
Then they should have been brought in
as coaches for 200k a year. They didn’t help the team on the field.
DEJESUS!!!
I cant argue against that
Erik Duerrwaecter
by Erik Christopher Duerrwaechter on Jan 27, 2011 5:07 PM CST up reply actions
in mart's defense..
He wanted Bulger and Dan The Fever.
Bulger got scooped up and Fever didn’t work out
So Collins (allready knowing the offense) was telast resort
Devin Hester. 14 Koff/Preturn TDs in 5 seasons.
And now Hanie has had a full year in this system
Time to get rid of the old QB
Erik Duerrwaecter
by Erik Christopher Duerrwaechter on Jan 25, 2011 9:11 PM CST up reply actions
No.
Cutler’s problem isn’t accuracy. It’s decision making, and his decision making deteriorates when he faces pressure, as it is with most QBs. Cutler needs to be coached on the details of playing the position with discipline and poise, and I believe Martz is the right guy to do that. His accuracy is superb when he has time and room to step into a throw with good footwork.
That being said, I would like to see Martz use more shotgun. The Bears’ line is not built to protect empty backfields from under center. This could be the case of Martz’s ego getting in the way of adapting to his personnel.
The Bears need to retool their offensive line desperately. ProFootballFocus has Webb rated as the worst right tackle in football. The middle of the line is not stout either. We will be facing Raji, Pickett, Jenkins, the Williams Wall, and Suh 6 times a year – we simply have to protect better.
The Packers have developed Rodgers for 6 years under their offensive system and have an underrated offensive line, including Sitton who is one of the best guards in the game. Rodgers’ success is because of that continuity and development. Give Cutler time as well – he will get better.
Cutler
is a very inaccurate qb. That part isn’t debatable.
Even when making throws with plenty of time his receivers often have to adjust significantly to balls. He doesn’t often hit guys in stride and allow them to make plays after the catch. Not saying he’s never made a good throw, just that he is far, far off the elite QBs when it comes to his accuracy.
DEJESUS!!!
It actually is.
This year, Cutler was league average in accuracy at 60.4% (60.7%). If that counts as “very inaccurate,” I would like to know what words you would use for Orton and Grossman.
by Steven Schweickert on Jan 25, 2011 5:24 PM CST up reply actions
so
below average accuracy.
and a below average accurate qb doesn’t exactly scream “martz offense.”
Neither did the playcalling after the bye. Not sure what offense we were running.. Lovie's?
I’ve got a headache now.
by DisCUBbobulated on Jan 26, 2011 3:39 PM CST up reply actions
The concensus
here seems to be to keep Martz, but the only rationale consistently given is that we need continuity.
That’s fine, and I to an extent agree (insofar as continuity is important), but by that logic it doesn’t matter who coordinates the offense as long as it’s the same guy as last year.
By many measures Martz was one of the 5 worst offensive coordinators in the NFL—do we want continuity above quality?
I want Cutler to have the same offensive coordinator the rest of his career, but I want him to have a great offensive coordinator the rest of his career. I’m not sure Martz fits the bill. Cutler got a little better this year, but the offense was worse.
DEJESUS!!!
By other measures
we had the worst O-Line and sufficient, not good or great, wide receivers. Do you not agree that sometimes, a scheme has to be in place to draft or build towards instead of molding your scheme to fit the players? Do you not agree that some parts need improving before a scheme is fully utilized?
by Steven Schweickert on Jan 25, 2011 5:23 PM CST up reply actions
I thought your post made some good points, as does this comment..
And I’m not really a person who just throws coaches under the bus. Here’s the thing that bothers me, though – it was when they went AWAY from Martz’s offense that they got better, and now they’ll be asking him to either a). try to run his standard philosophy up the flagpole again in 2011 and hope it works better this time, or b) adapt to a coaching style that he’s not known for, and likely not experienced with. Martz is an X’s and O’s guy, so it’s not like his strength is getting players to play fundamentally better football or show up more ready to play, leaving.. a) and b) above. If the Bears have lost faith in Martz, or believe, in hindsight, that they don’t have the players to successfully work his system, we’ll find out soon enough. If they still think that can fit mostly round pegs into mostly square holes enough to make it work, we will see him for another year. But – mark my words – if next year doesn’t go well, the conensus here and everywhere else will be “why the hell didn’t we get rid of him after last year!?!”
by DisCUBbobulated on Jan 25, 2011 5:34 PM CST up reply actions
You could argue, however
that this year, Martz didn’t have all the parts to run his offense, and you’d think that at least would be remedied in part this off-season.
by Steven Schweickert on Jan 25, 2011 5:36 PM CST up reply actions
Well, we have an Angelo Draft and CBA-complicated Free Agency to do it..
How many parts do we need? I hope not many.
by DisCUBbobulated on Jan 26, 2011 3:41 PM CST up reply actions
Only interior lineman and a big target at WR is seriously needed for the Offense
Erik Duerrwaecter
by Erik Christopher Duerrwaechter on Jan 26, 2011 7:32 PM CST up reply actions
are*
Erik Duerrwaecter
by Erik Christopher Duerrwaechter on Jan 26, 2011 7:32 PM CST up reply actions
And Offensive Tackles...
That don’t surrender over 10 sacks a piece a year and can pick up faster players (DBs and LBs coming from a 3-4 front).
Corey Wootton, the Favre Slayer.
by Brendan Hess on Jan 28, 2011 11:43 AM CST up reply actions
Accuracy
From the tape that I have seen, Cutler makes the throws when he is given time and uses good footwork.
http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-network-playbook/09000d5d81d47438/Playbook-Bears-Super-Bowl-bound
http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-network-playbook/09000d5d81d18412/Playbook-Bears-Vikings-recap
When he has time and can step up, he’s probably one of the most accurate QBs in the NFL.
Precisely the point I was inquiring
Erik Duerrwaecter
by Erik Christopher Duerrwaechter on Jan 25, 2011 5:36 PM CST up reply actions
and when he doesn't have protection
He is consistently high in his throws. At least its something we can plan for. Its on target, or high, 95% of the time.
Corey Wootton, the Favre Slayer.
by Brendan Hess on Jan 28, 2011 11:43 AM CST up reply actions
Exactly
We just need a WR that gets into their routes fast and an O-Lineman that can buy Cutler some time.
Erik Duerrwaecter
by Erik Christopher Duerrwaechter on Jan 28, 2011 7:15 PM CST up reply actions
The margin of error
for Cutler is very small, due to our offensive line not giving him a clean pocket and our receivers not being able to win jump balls. When teams like the Packers run press-man looks with a single high safety, the responsibility is on the receivers to get open. In all honesty the Packers were probably the single worst matchup in the NFL for the Bears due to their superb secondary.
We will be able to make a judgment on Martz after the line is improved and the receivers upgraded. This year in many ways was a transition year, even though the Bears made it to the conference championship game.
The dominance of the Green Bay defense over the last 2 years is a huge concern
If beating the Packers is job 1 as Lovie has stated he needs Martz and company to figure out how to win against Green Bay’s defense. That GB defense is young for the most part and getting better. Bigger, physical WR’s are indeed needed to beat them. Aroma? Greg Jennings beat Tim Jennings like a drum time and time again. Rodgers didn’t even look to Peanut’s side of the field for much of the game. We need a WR who can dominate in press coverage because that is an easy throw if the WR does his job.
That's why I keep saying
getting a big-bodied WR who can be more physical than their tough CBs is almost as important as upgrading the line.
"The problem isn't that people aren't smart, it's that some folks have an attention span of about seven days. Look at the broader picture and you'll always be smarter." - Bill Barnwell of F.O. on why the media picks playoff winners on Monday.
I agree those GB corners are manhandling our receivers
Its almost embarrassing what they are doing on deep routes. With the exception of the Bennett score in the NFCCG which was brilliant, GB CBs own our wideouts past 20 yards. We have to address this exact issue this off season as Shields and Tramon whats his name are young and only going to get better. Lets get a couple of big tall wide outs for the bombs and post routes and use Knox and the smaller guys on the underneath stuff where being smaller can be an advantage.
White Sox fans need not apply.
by Bears-Cubs Bulls on Jan 25, 2011 10:49 PM CST up reply actions
I think, whether they should or not, they will ride out both Cutler and Martz..
In some ways, they are kindred souls, as far as the bears go.. Sunk costs, big bets already laid down, a commitment to a direction that will cost too much to shift out of. It’s not the worst news in the world, or at least I hope not, because both have very high talent levels at their respective jobs. It’s just that, in order to really determine if it was a good idea to hire Martz, we will be spending Jay Cutler’s prime finding out and organizing the rest of the team around a very specific offensive strategy. I remember Martz wasn’t the first, or even the second or third choice for the bears, but he’s our guy, and Cutler’s guy, now. We can only hope that this year’s dung sprouts tulips in 2011.
by DisCUBbobulated on Jan 25, 2011 5:51 PM CST reply actions
Cutler was sacked this year more than he was in 3 years with Denver
That’s mind boggling. Had the lowest sack percentage in 2008 and then comes to this offensive line/receiver combo and BOOM! Martz and Tice have to improve the blocking schemes and get the receivers to make the proper reads. Cutler needs to get the ball out quicker, and if that means running earlier or checking down more so be it. His receivers just don’t make enough plays downfield to warrant trying to extend the play. When Olsen fought for the ball to prevent an INT in the Packer game that was one of only a handful of times that happened all year. Knox and Hester are horrible at fighting for the ball. A coaching change would be disasterous and be Cutler’s 4th OC in 4 years. You can’t get better like that. I hope O-Line and a big, athletic WR are on their draft/FA list. There are certainly some issues on defense, but the offense as usual is holding this team back.
Cutler throws alot of 50% balls meaning our guy and defender have a 50/50 chance of getting it
We gotta get guys who will fight for those balls and come down with the rock. Brandon Marshall should be the prototype receiver for Cutler. Knox is good but he lost stock this season once the league started game planning for him, makes it alot harder doesn’t it Johnny.
The good news is this stuff is all fixable and we have the core to build around. I had next year as our year and I fully expect to win the SB next year in blowout fashion with Forte scoring 3 TDs in tha game.
White Sox fans need not apply.
by Bears-Cubs Bulls on Jan 25, 2011 10:55 PM CST up reply actions
We have to remember
Martz was on the Coaching staff that drafted
Tory Holt
Orlando Pace
Sooooooo yeah
Devin Hester. 14 Koff/Preturn TDs in 5 seasons.
How about.....NO.
First year in a complex offense. Martz’s offense is not a one year install. If that was what was expected, then he was set up for failure from the start.
Cutler has been through 3 systems in 3 years. 4 in 4 years doesn’t sound like a good idea.
And the offense made progress through the year.
Rash choices are never prudent.
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Jan 26, 2011 2:27 AM CST reply actions
NO
Fix the O line and it will get better. Route running and Timing will improve between Cutler and recievers/TE’s. Maybe everyone could learn the playbook and Cutler could change the play if needed.
which martz?
are we getting the run 50% martz? or the greatest show on turf martz?
angelo isn’t smart enough to built the greatest show on turf, slop edition. if martz is going to continue running the ball and dumbing down the offesnse to the bears talent level.
Absoultely, Cutler must have a different OC every year to keep him on his toes.
I always turn to the sports section first. The sports page records people's accomplishments; the front page has nothing but man's failures.
~Earl Warren
by lookingdeadred on Jan 26, 2011 7:48 AM CST reply actions 1 recs
This made me laugh out loud, literally.
sarcasm at it’s finest, sir! Rec’d
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Jan 29, 2011 1:52 AM CST up reply actions
Hell no.
Lifelong Arizona Cardinals/Chicago Bears fan [I have always lived in Arizona, dad is from Chicago].
As a Vikings fan,
You guys need to keep him. My reasoning, even though his offense may be complex, it’s hard to learn a new offense in just one year. In year 2 you will start to notice the difference once you get a year under your belt.
Keep Martz and get a ball busting QB coach...
Focus on Cutler’s Footwork, mechanics, and tendancy to throw off the back foot…this will create a more consistent Cutler…and with another year of the Martzfense under his belt, it could be scary good in 2011!!!!
Unreasonable people make life difficult...
Last I heard Jeremy Bates is available and he was a good QB coach although a mediocre OC.
Many that live deserve death. And some die that deserve life. Can you give it to them? Then be not too eager to deal out death in the name of justice, fearing for your own safety. Even the wise cannot see all ends.- JRR Tolkien
Martz was a QB coach for years before becoming a OC and HC
Cutler is Cutler, he is never going to be Tom Brady or Peyton Manning on the field or in front of a camera no matter how much you bust his balls. Martz is big on mechanics, Cutler has mechanics that work for him and Martz will work with Jay to get the best out of him. Just don’t expect a coach to come in and turn him into a poster-boy.
. "Most football teams are temperamental. That's 90% temper and 10% mental."
--Doug Plank
/i saw
an interview a couple days ago where Martz said they work on footwork like 20 minutes a week, that it isn’t a major emphasis.
DEJESUS!!!
according to who?
. "Most football teams are temperamental. That's 90% temper and 10% mental."
--Doug Plank
meaning why would 20 mins a week not be enough?
. "Most football teams are temperamental. That's 90% temper and 10% mental."
--Doug Plank
According to Martz
they didn’t make footwork a major emphasis. His words, not mine.
DEJESUS!!!
He speaks the truth
Erik Duerrwaecter
by Erik Christopher Duerrwaechter on Jan 28, 2011 7:16 PM CST up reply actions
Offensive stats were very similar for 2009 and 2010 but
2010 Bear QB’s were sacked 21 more times than in 2009 but turned the ball over 6 fewer times. I think Martz has Jay making better decisions and we can expect continued improvement next year. Improve the OL and add a good WR and this offense will jump up the stats sheet. Not only will the numbers look better but they will score more points and hold the ball longer each game which will help the defense. Look at the Raiders, they change coaches every other year and how is that working out for them?
. "Most football teams are temperamental. That's 90% temper and 10% mental."
--Doug Plank
I don't give a good god damn who the OC is...
as long as they figure out that Forte is what makes this team and not Jay Cutler or the midget WR crew. If I never see a HB pass or an end around on third down in the fourth quarter in a playoff game again, that would be great too.
I’m tired of the excuses people are making for him about having an O-Line that couldn’t pass block or an inaccurate QB or height-challenged WRs. We know this. So it shouldn’t have taken him half a season and his “star” QB getting his butt kicked to know this and make the proper adjustments.
Fine, he has Jay Cutler’s arm and wants to use it… I get that. Doesn’t really explain Cutler leaving the game and calling three straight passes on Todd Collins’ first possession when you’re still only down 2 scores. Next possession, Forte gets an 8 yard run and Martz still wouldn’t let Forte try to pick up a 3rd-and-2. And the WR end around was the worst big game play call I’ve ever witnessed.
If they keep him on, fine… but this team would have won more games with a lesser name that will make it more about your team winning games than proving he’s some kind of genius. He’s not quite at Milton Bradley level, but he’s just one of those guys that I’ve never wanted to see win, and it’s hard to adjust that just because he’s now coaching for my team.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Just North of Wrigley Field
I don't care if my OC
is likeable, but I do care if he’s a good OC. Martz was not a good OC this year. He was among the worst in football. Why that is less important than continuity to everyone here is beyond me.
DEJESUS!!!
by tomas21 on Jan 27, 2011 3:18 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Not really
Martz was decent, just had to get over his stubborn old self. He does deserve credit for our trip to the NFC Championship game.
Erik Duerrwaecter
by Erik Christopher Duerrwaechter on Jan 27, 2011 5:09 PM CST up reply actions
Why is "decent" acceptable?
I agree that Lovie and Martz are decent options as coaches. I require superior. Jeff Fisher, currently unemployed as of today, and a run-calling, button-pushing monkey, would have got this team to the NFC Championship game this year. I would have credited Martz if his system didn’t produce two embarrassing losses to our hated rivals. Not embarrassing as in out-of-hand, embarrassing that they happened at all and led to our rivals going to the Super Bowl.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Just North of Wrigley Field
by jameslcrockett on Jan 27, 2011 7:27 PM CST up reply actions
If you require superior, statisically, how is Fisher your guy?
Ignoring the “He’d’ve gotten us there!”… how do you know that, anyway? Just curious, cause I need some lottery numbers next week… :)
He’s been the Oilers/Titans coach since ‘94 (first full season ’95) for 17 years (16 full seasons). He’s been .500 or better 11 times (exactly .500 5 times) with six playoff berths and one Super Bowl appearance. He averages about 8.81 wins per year.
Lovie’s got seven years under his belt. He’s been .500 or better four times (exactly .500 0 times) with three playoff berths and one Super Bowl appearance. He averages exactly 9.00 wins per year.
If you go with Fisher, aren’t you going for the definition, or at least below Lovie, of mediocre? The only advantage he has on Lovie is time in the league.
by Steven Schweickert on Jan 28, 2011 7:05 AM CST up reply actions
So...
you’re going to hold taking over a moribund Oilers team against Jeff Fisher… and then having to deal with a transition to a new market with a mediocre team… and having to compete against the dynasties of Pittsburgh and Indianapolis (within the same division) and New England?
Lovie was given the NFL equivalent of a silver spoon in his mouth getting to coach the Chicago Bears as a rookie, with the defensive talent already in place and then get gifted Devin Hester, Matt Forte and Jay Cutler as offensive weapons, and now Julius Peppers, in an uncapped year. You can’t even say Fisher had a better ownership situation, since his owner is batshit crazy.
BTW… I didn’t say Fisher was my guy. Fisher was just one example of a coach that would have “gotten us there”. There are plenty others. If Fisher came in and did a “decent” job, I wouldn’t accept that either. (My guys are Bill Cowher, when he gets tired of being a coach with just one Super Bowl win, or Mike Holmgren, when he gets tired of screwing around in Cleveland. Though, I’d put Fisher third easily. I don’t know where Lovie Smith would rank, but he might not even be in the top 10 of guys I want coaching the Bears. Let him coach Arizona, or some team where you can act like you don’t care most of the time.)
But please point out what qualities Lovie Smith has which lead you to 100% he’s had more success with this team than Jeff Fisher would have. I don’t believe in Lovie Smith’s ability to win Super Bowls as a head coach and think he’s cost the Bears at least two now.
It’s about the process, not the results.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Just North of Wrigley Field
by jameslcrockett on Jan 28, 2011 3:00 PM CST up reply actions
Jeff Fisher never got anyone anywhere.....
He had 6 winning seasons in 17 years. Can we quit pretending that he was anything more than an average coach?
And the Oilers Fisher took over were loaded with talent, as has been the Titans team he has coached since the change. Let’s stop pretending Fisher is something he isn’t.
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Jan 29, 2011 1:56 AM CST up reply actions
Again, please tell me how Fisher would have "Gotten us there."
Until I see veritable proof that a “fire and passion” and swimming-in-a-sea-of-Sylvester-the-Cat-spittle type coach has a distinct advantage, to me, it doesn’t matter what type of coach is leading your team.
Let him coach Arizona, or some team where you can act like you don’t care most of the time.)
Can I ask why someone who doesn’t care would be involved in coaching an NFL team? Cause it’s easy? Cause it’s not time consuming? Cause you need passion to even be in coaching, especially at the top level. Just because he’s not screaming at people and grabbing facemasks doesn’t mean he doesn’t have a passion for his job.
You want to know what qualities Lovie Smith has? Color me crazy. I like his calmness. I like the aura of invulnerability and confidence he has. But those aren’t any reason to have him as the coach over someone else.
The number one quality I want is winning. Lovie in seven years has gotten us to the CCG more times than Fisher has. Lovie has four winning seasons and two 7-9 years (and his first 5-11 year), three playoff berths, for two CCGs and one Super Bowl appearance. Fisher in sixteen (nine more) full seasons has six winning seasons (two more), five even seasons (five more), and five losing seasons (two more; two 7-9s, 6-10, 5-11, 4-12). He has six playoff berths (three more, in nine more seasons) with one AFCCG (one less) and one Super Bowl appearance (equal). Fisher’s record is mostly built on tenure.
Please tell me where, in any of this, Jeff Fisher has the advantage just for being a certain type of coach. Lovie’s record isn’t ideal, but if we’re putting Lovie’s record against Jeff Fisher’s and picking between the two? I know which one I’ll take.
As an aside…
I require superior. Jeff Fisher, currently unemployed as of today, and a run-calling, button-pushing monkey, would have got this team to the NFC Championship game this year.
That combination of sentences in that placement makes him your guy.
by Steven Schweickert on Jan 29, 2011 8:05 AM CST up reply actions
Everyone here knows I'm no great Lovie Supporter.
But I agree that there is something to be said for a coach who doesn’t appear to be visibly rattled all the time, or who, in other words, acts as though he’s been there before.
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Jan 29, 2011 4:21 PM CST up reply actions
I, likea lot of people, wasn't behind the Martz signing.
But, although the stats you presented might dictate otherwise, i noticed what seemd like marked improvement in the overall offense especially in the later half of the season. Whether it was Cutler, Martz, more experienced Wr’s, or a resurgent Forte i precieved the offense as considerably better than any yeear under Ron Turner.
Perception dictates reality even if it contradicts some stats.
Our
ranking in offensive points scored and offensive yards games dropped from 2009 to 2010. Those are facts. Your perception isn’t reality, it’s your perception. I’m glad you felt better about the offense, but the offense wasn’t better.
The reality is that Cutler played a little better this year, but the offense as a whole was less effective.
DEJESUS!!!
Because the WHOLE offense had to learn an Offense that they saw as alien in Chicago
Erik Duerrwaecter
by Erik Christopher Duerrwaechter on Jan 27, 2011 5:10 PM CST up reply actions
No...
they didn’t have to. They had it insanely forced on them. When they ran the appropriate offense, the team propelled to a first-round bye. And when they got that first-round bye, the idiot tried to again force an offense that wouldn’t work which led to two losses to the Packers. Until I get commitment that he won’t try to force “Martz-fense” on the Chicago Bears, he won’t have my support.
This team needs a little Jay Cutler and a lot of Matt Forte. I only want a brain trust in place that understands that.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Just North of Wrigley Field
by jameslcrockett on Jan 27, 2011 7:31 PM CST up reply actions
another 20 years of Ron Turner? No Thank You!
. "Most football teams are temperamental. That's 90% temper and 10% mental."
--Doug Plank
Good thing he doesn't need it.....
The insanely force offense scored more points in it’s first year than Turner’s did in it’s fifth behind a better line. I’d call that improvement. Our offense also had a drop from 53 turnovers under Turner in ’09 to 40 turnovers under Martz in ’10. And being that we only saw 300 fewer offensive yards all season, I would be willing to guess that those would be made up by the difference between 8.5 yards per punt return in ’09 vs 17.1 yards per punt return in ’10, ya think?
So, you can look at the rankings, which don’t take into account our field position and our ST game, and ignore the reality, which is that the offense scored more points and was a better unit, even with a worse line.
And as to the whole running the ball, thing?
2009: 337 rushes for 1492 yards and 6 TDs. Bears rushed 36% (563 passes attempted, 35 sacks and 337 rushes total to 935 offensive plays. 337 rushes/935 plays = 36%)
2010: 414 rushes for 1616 yards and 10 TDs and the Bears rushed 45% (466 passes attempted, 56 sacks and 414 rushes total 916 plays. 414 rushes/916 plays = 45%)
In other words, Martz rushed 77 times more than Turner or for 9% more of the total plays. 55/45 isn’t that unbalanced..
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Jan 29, 2011 3:14 AM CST up reply actions
not to mention the exta 22 sacks
thats 175 yards and another 75 yards if he had completed 12 passes. I don’t know how many of those would have resulted in first downs and more offensive plays.
. "Most football teams are temperamental. That's 90% temper and 10% mental."
--Doug Plank
Every other offense
Martz has run had dramatic improvements in his first year running the offense. Our offense got worse.
Martz just isn’t a fit for Cutler and the rest of the personnel here.
DEJESUS!!!
No, our offense didn't get worse.
306 offensive points is greater than 304 offensive points. Simple math.
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Jan 29, 2011 2:55 AM CST up reply actions
Our Offensive Ranking was down partially to better field position...
The NFL average was the 29.9-yard line in the regular season. Nearly 4 yards might not sound like much, but consider that over the course of their 198 possessions, the Bears’ offense got almost an 800-yard head start over the average team. That’s largely how an offense that ranked No. 30 in the NFL (based on total yards) still scored nearly 21 points per game.
And our 20.9 ppg in 2010 was slightly better than our 20.4 ppg in 2009
Teams with good special teams typically have poorer offensive rankings becuase the offensive rankings are total yards excluding return yards.
Unreasonable people make life difficult...
by WisBearsFan34 on Jan 28, 2011 2:47 PM CST up reply actions
You could argue
that statistic as being even more condemning of our offense—we scored fewer points than last year, and scored fewer points than the average team despite better field position.
DEJESUS!!!
Again sometimes success isnt immediate
We may need a piece here and there, but also the Offense was far better after the bye. Stats wont show that because its accumilated over the whole year, including the dreadful first half.
Erik Duerrwaecter
by Erik Christopher Duerrwaechter on Jan 28, 2011 7:20 PM CST up reply actions
Except
that every other offense Martz coached got much better in their first year under him.
DEJESUS!!!
So did this one....
More points. Forte breaks 4.0 per carry. Nearly had our 1st thousand yard receiver in nearly a decade. won 11 games. made the playoffs. won a playoff game. All in the first year of a complex system with a QB who had never run this type of game (O’sullivan in SF and Kitna in DET both had experience in this type of system).
Ket go of your hate, tomas…..it will only lead you to the dark side :)
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Feb 1, 2011 5:16 PM CST up reply actions
And, for the record.....
ranking have nothing to do with whether a team improved. they have to do with how you performed compared to the rest of the league in that single year. Big difference. For example, the 2009 Bears ranked 21st in points allowed. That means 11 teams were worse. BUT, they also allowed the 6th most points in the history of this franchise. So thier ranking says that they were close to the middle of the pack. But their performance was garbage, as indicated by only allowing more points 5 times in the their 90 seasons.
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Feb 1, 2011 5:20 PM CST up reply actions
Stats dont reveal all signs of improvement
I personally thought the offense played alot harder than the previous years. And again who can argue against Matt Forte blossoming under Martz? That, to me, is as big as Cutler becoming a better QB.
Erik Duerrwaecter
by Erik Christopher Duerrwaechter on Feb 1, 2011 6:24 PM CST up reply actions
you could argue
that we were lucky to score any points with that offensive line.
. "Most football teams are temperamental. That's 90% temper and 10% mental."
--Doug Plank
We did not score fewer points than last year.....
Bears 2010: 234 Points
Bears 2009: 227 Points.
And 234>227…..
Now, I’m waiting for the But Devin Returned 3 Punts argument…..
True, and DJ Moore also scored on an INT.
But wait! Last year the Bears returned 2 for TDs and had an INT for a TD and a safety.
What does all off that mean? That Martz managed to coach the Bears to more points from the offense in his first year behind the worst line of the decade (306) as Ron Turner in the 5th year of his system (304). And comparing Martz’s first year here to both of Turner’s first years?
Martz: 306 offensive points
Turner 2005: 218 offensive points (that’s 88 less)
Turner 1993: 199 offensive points (and that would be 107 less)
Hey, let’s look at all of Turner’s seasons and how well the offense scored….
1993: 199 points
1994: 264 points
1995: 376 points
1996: 262 points
2005: 218 points
2006: 362 points
2007: 278 points
2008: 324 points
2009: 304 points
You’ll notice that only three of Turner’s 9 seasons saw him eclipse Martz’s first season here. You’ll also note that Turners offense managed to break 300 points only 4 times in 9 years.
Now for Martz……..
1999: 447 points
2000: 512 points
2001: 467 points
2002: 302 points
2003: 410 points
2004: 288 points
2005: 335 points
2006: 298 points
2007: 309 points
2008: 311 points
2010: 306 points
You’ll notice that, in contrast to Turner, only 2 of his 11 seasons saw less than 300 points and none of his seasons have ever dropped anywhere close to 200 or below. You’ll also note that Martz has 4 seasons over 400 points and 1 over 500. Might be worth noting that Martz’s 26.5 points per game as a head coach is 1st in NFL history.
But, back to the original point…..Martz’s offense scored more points this year, in the first year of of installing a complex offense behind the worst line of the last decade, than Turner’s offense scored last year in the fifth year of his offense behind a better line.
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Jan 29, 2011 2:52 AM CST up reply actions
Ummmm......
While the year end rankings were worse when compared to last season, they were far better than the the first year of either tenure of Turner’s stay here. We ranked 21st in points this season. in 2005, we scored 74 fewer points, and were ranked 26th in the league. And in Turners first tenure, the Bears score 100 fewer points and ranked 24th.
Also, In Turner’s nine years as the Bears OC, the Bears only scored more than they did this year three times. And last year wasn’t one of them.
In other words, The Bears, with Cutler at the helm, scored more points with Martz than with Turner.
And the offense doesn’t get less effective while scoring more points.
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Jan 29, 2011 2:05 AM CST up reply actions
eddie williams
big kid fullback bears re- signed him like taylor but hes just too much like forte.. need a power back to compliment forte but with his contract taylor os going anywhere..
needs ? o line… big go to guy reciever.. ball hawk safety
Hitman is a ball hawk/playmaker
We need a more consistant force in the interior D-Line, far too many swinging gates for QBs to step into. O-Line is a need as well as a go-to guy, but DT is also a serious need.
Erik Duerrwaecter
by Erik Christopher Duerrwaechter on Jan 28, 2011 7:24 PM CST up reply actions
I like the strides that Melton made this year, and I think.......
he could end up as a very good 3Tech this season with Adams at nose. Toe in rotation. I’m not sure that DT is as big a need as I originally thought it would be.
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Jan 29, 2011 3:18 AM CST up reply actions
But we also need a DT that can do everything like Tommie used to
Someone that can stop the run and pash rush like a man demented. Can you say….Corey Liuget?
Erik Duerrwaecter
by Erik Christopher Duerrwaechter on Jan 29, 2011 3:58 PM CST up reply actions
LOL....
You’re starting to remind me of No It All last year with his Kam Chancellor campaign. :)
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Jan 29, 2011 4:18 PM CST up reply actions
Haha yea I guess me and SMD are his personal hipe band
However unlike the Chancellor campain we truly believe we have a legit chance of getting him haha. I liked Chancellor too.
Erik Duerrwaecter
by Erik Christopher Duerrwaechter on Jan 29, 2011 8:04 PM CST up reply actions
play on, player......

in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Jan 29, 2011 8:11 PM CST up reply actions
Me see no pic
Erik Duerrwaecter
by Erik Christopher Duerrwaechter on Jan 30, 2011 11:38 AM CST up reply actions
hmmm............
I see it. Why don’t you? It’s a smiley band!
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Jan 30, 2011 12:07 PM CST up reply actions
Oh, okay now I see it haha
My laptop has been a little messed up for a while.
Erik Duerrwaecter
by Erik Christopher Duerrwaechter on Jan 30, 2011 1:06 PM CST up reply actions

by 




















