Five Questions with Daily Norseman

It's Friday. There's a game this weekend. So of course it's time for Five Questions.
This week we have Ted Glover from Daily Norseman, SBNation's home of the Minnesota Vikings. Ted knows his stuff and loves his team, through good times and McNabb (see what I did there?)
He'll have my answers to his questions going up sometime today(Kev's Note: HERE THEY ARE), but for now, let's see how Ted feels about the coaching staff, the McNabb acquisition, the Vikings' close losses, their upcoming slate of games, and a bonus--what's up with the stadium thing?
1. How are things going across the front office, now that we're firmly into Frazier's era as HC. Does ownership feel like they've made a right choice, or d you think Frazier's not going to be allowed the growing pains most first time Head Coaches get?
No, I think they made the right choice, and Frazier will have at least two or three years to see what he has, unless he goes all Detroit Lions in the Matt Millen era. All things considered he did a good job as interim head coach under very trying conditions (Childress/Favre fiasco, Moss fiasco, Metrodome roof collapse fiasco and all the crap that ensued from that), he has the respect of the players, and if Brad Childress got a few years to turn it around, Frazier will as well.
2. McNabb is, well, being the McNabb of recent vintage. Is it time for the Christian Ponder era to begin?
Yes, but the Arizona win probably bought McNabb two more wins, minimum. Unless he looks like the love child of Tarvaris Jackson and Spergeon Wynn, even a loss against the Bears means he gets one more start with the Packers following up the Bears game. There's two arguments with rookie QB's--start right away or let him learn under a vet for a year. The Vikes went with the latter, obviously, and I was of the opinion that as long as McNabb could get it done, fine. Well, he isn't, and he won't be back next year, so the vast majority of us Vikes fans want to unwrap the new toy and see what we have. With the Packers and Lions getting off to such strong starts, the chances of making the playoffs are almost nil. So let Ponder play and learn, and my feeling is that it will be good in the long run for the franchise.
3. The Vikings four losses so far have been decided by a touchdown or less. Would you attribute it to lack of talent, coaching struggles, or rotten luck?
Lack of talent, no. Coaching struggles, yes. Rotten luck, no. There is talent on both sides of the ball, and for at least one half they look like the best team in football. Then everything falls apart faster than the Cubs bullpen (Go Cardinals, woo!--uh, sorry. I'm a big Cards fan). On offense, OC Bill Musgrave does a fantastic job of mixing the run and the pass in the first half, and the players do a very good job of executing the gameplan. But for whatever reason, everything changes in the second. The holes that were there for Adrian Peterson disappear, Donovan McNabb can't complete a pass, and the offense can't convert a third down. That puts the defense back on the field quicker than they should, and now they can't get off the field because they're gassed, and it just builds on itself. They're also a very undisciplined team, near the top in penalties, and that, to me, is directly attributable to coaching. Long term, I think Leslie Frazier is the right guy for the job, but we're witnessing growing pains in learning a new offense and a coaching staff still gelling with their players.
4. The next four games for the Vikings look rough: Bears, Packers, Panthers, Packers---what's your prediction for that stretch?
It depends on which Vikings team shows up. They finally played a complete game against the Cardinals, and when you take that performance and look at the first half of the Detroit, San Diego, and Tampa games a 2-2 split with wins over the Bears and Panthers, or even a 3-1 run with a home win against Green Bay isn't out of the realm of possibility. But then the realist in me comes creeping back, and that complete game was against a bad Cardinals team, and we can't ignore those terrible second halves, or that Kansas City game, and 2-2 seems like a longshot. I'd like to think they can beat you guys and Carolina, but losses against you and Green Bay probably means that Ponder starts against the Panthers, so 0-4 could be a distinct possibility.
5. Who'll have more passing yards--McNabb or Cutler?
Really, you think McNabb could have more passing yards than Cutler? C'mon, that's a trick question, right? It's not? Well, let me think about this for sec. If the Vikes get a serious pass rush, and McNabb learns how to get the football in the zip code of his receiver, then sure, anything is possible. Oh, wait. This game is in Chicago, and you play outdoors, on grass, conditions that the Vikings are particularly terrible in. Cutler.
Bonus question--seriously, what the hell is going on with the stadium thing?
I could do a whole guest post just on this. In a nutshell, the Vikings have a plan in Ramsey County, which is in St. Paul. Minneapolis, where the Metrodome is currently located, never came up with a viable plan...until the Vikings embraced the Ramsey County plan. Now, believe it or not, the Minneapolis interests are doing everything they can to sabotage the St. Paul plan and somehow force the Vikings back to Minneapolis...although there is no plan, location, or financing--everything that the Ramsey County plan has. The Vikings lease at the Metrodome expires on February 1st, so legally, there is nothing keeping the Vikings in Minnesota once the lease expires. I personally believe that if the governor and the legislature would get behind the Ramsey County plan, they could get it passed, but the governor and the legislature are playing politics with the whole thing. I think they want the new stadium in Minneapolis and are holding off on bringing the Ramsey County plan to a vote to give the Minneapolis interests every possible opportunity to come up with a plan. And I also think the Minneapolis cabal won't come up with a workable plan that the Vikings will agree to, and would rather see the Vikings leave the state than see them land in someplace other than Minneapolis
Big thanks to Ted, and good luck in all but two of the rest of your games this season!
16 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Man, I thought the Bears had stadium issues - at least they know where they'll play home games next year
Jared Allen and the Vikings D seem to be playing at a high level right now. Besides #69, is there any other under-the-radar players the Bears offense should be concerned about?
by NorthSideBearsFan on Oct 14, 2011 9:52 AM CDT reply actions
Brian Robison
the DE opposite Jared Allen. He took over for Ray Edwards, and has been great. He’s smaller than your average DE, and some of us (myself included) thought he might have a tough time being an every down guy (he was more of a situational pass rusher his first few years), but he has stepped up and played very, very well so far,
Some people just need a high five. In the face. With a chair.
I would say Sanford as well
He’s not going to wow you but he’s a solid bonus to what we were putting back there last year.
Putting Ponder in isn't the question, it's the answer.
My question:
Any truth to the rumors that Jared Allen has been salivating pure mayonaise at the thought of going up against the Bears’ offensive line?
Mayonaise and mustard, actually
:). I felt sorry for Cutler on Monday against the Bears. I’ve never seen such an overall terrible performance by an o-line over the course of an entire game. I’ve seen bad play in spurts, sometimes for even a half or three quarters, but I can’t remember one play that Cutler had time to set up in the pocket and go through his progressions.
Some people just need a high five. In the face. With a chair.
Even on that throw, he had to shuffle in the pocket a little bit
by NorthSideBearsFan on Oct 14, 2011 2:54 PM CDT up reply actions
So does Peyton after 6 seconds.
So does Brady. So does Rodgers.
You’re never gonna find an offensive line that can consistently create a statuesque QB for 5+ seconds. It doesn’t exist. Don’t even try for it.
But having an offensive line that can protect a statue for 3-4 seconds, allow him to step up and throw the rock? That’s not outside the realm of possibility…
Now, believe it or not, the Minneapolis interests are doing everything they can to sabotage the St. Paul plan and somehow force the Vikings back to Minneapolis…although there is no plan, location, or financing—everything that the Ramsey County plan has.
Wow – that’s interesting, and not something I’ve seen mentioned before (though I’ve only a passing familiarity with the situation). Wouldn’t mind an Idiot’s Guide to the Vikings’ Stadium Situation… I’ll be that idiot!
When I assume, I'm not "making an ass out of u and me"... I'm actually putting u between me and an ass.
Yeah, we know.
Took the 'G' out your waffle, all you got left is your Ego.
Editor at windycitygridiron.com | @KDoggers
lol
Whenever Mike Ditka boards an aircraft, it changes its call sign to Bear Force One.
by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Oct 14, 2011 2:20 PM CDT up reply actions
How has the offensive line been this season for you guys?
AP’s a stud and McNabb’s a dud, but other than the left tackles issues I haven’t heard anything good or bad.
If its free, take two.
Eh, a decidedly mixed bag
Pass protection hasn’t been great, but McNabb has had time to throw the ball, just not consistently. I think the run blocking has been better this year than the last couple of years, but again, just not consistent over the course of an entire game. Phil Loadholt, the right tackle, has been pretty bad this year, but he did have a good game against Arizona, so maybe he’s coming around.
Some people just need a high five. In the face. With a chair.
They are...decent
Aside from the Arizona game they have had some serious protection issues, only time will tell if things have changed or if the blind squirrel found a nut. Run blocking isn’t exactly perfect but it doesn’t need to be for Peterson. I think the biggest thing that is saving this O-Line right now is the heavy dosage of Jim Kleinsasser, he is used as a TE/FB almost exclusively as a blocker (considering that the Vikings keep an extra man on blocking in 55% of their plays this is pretty significant) Without him things would probably be similar to the Bears OL






















