The opposite view: Ask the Broncos
Hello folks,

I’m a die hard fan of the Denver Broncos and I come here in peace for us to discuss some football. I’m not a staffer for the Mile High Report blog, but I can consider myself as a good studious of the game. I expect to have a classy talk with you Bears fans, since I think your agreements / disagreements and thoughts about the game could enrich us all.
In Denver we are very excited about the Mile High Magic being translated to wins. It's fantastic what we are witnessing. We sit now on a 7-5 AFC West lead and we are real contenders to make the playoffs. Impressive, if we remember a 1-4 start with Kyle Orton, so I don't think anyone was expecting to be that far this year. Von Miller, our #2 overall last draft, is the real deal and has an outstanding elite first step. He is also in the hunt to break the 14.5 rookie sacks mark (and hey, he is a 4-3 LB!). It's great news to know he is expected to return after 1 week out due to a thumb repair surgery.
How about you guys, how do you expect to see the QB position for this game? Jay Cutler is a huge loss and unfortunately for you the Chiefs put a claim on Orton before you. Your defense is really good and Julius Peppers is always a threat. And Matt Forte, what a huge loss also huh? He is a great all-purpose h-back... I put myself at disposal to talk about our sunday game. Just ask what you want about the Denver Broncos or let's talk about the Chicago Bears' strenghness or weakness... it’s your call, pals.
My respects, Fabio.
This FanPost was written by a Windy City Gridiron member, and does not necessarily reflect the ideas or opinions of its staff or community.
87 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Let me start by reading your opinion about someone I'm sure would be your first question....
How do you guys see all this over-talk about Tim Tebow? What do you think about him succeeding?
This signature was sacked by Von Miller.
I bleed Orange & Blue.
I'm going to be honest.....
I don’t like Tebow all that much and never have. I think he’s overrated and it bugs me that people keep on with the whole “He just wins” argument because all Vince Young did was win and look at how that played out. BUT I have to give him credit because he makes plays when one needs to be made. What he’s doing is working for the team and they’re winning, which is all that matters.
Having said that I really do wonder how long he can get away with doing what he’s doing at the QB position. He’s made some nice throws but I’ve also seen his receivers make great plays on the ball, which is their job of course, but that masks how mediocre he is as an actual QB. He’s not making his receivers better, they’re making HIM look better and ideally it’s either the QB making them look good or a good combination of both. Not only that but what happens when the Broncos D, the biggest reason they’ve been winning games IMO, faces a legit NFL offense like the Packers, Saints, Patriots or Giants? Against the Lions, Tebow had no answer and couldn’t bring his team back in that game and was just awful against a relentless D and a pretty good offense.
I Personally don’t care about weird delivery or what not but I have my doubts that Tebow can hang with a QB that can put up 300 yards and multiple TD’s consistently and against any defense and become a QB that can also do those things. If he starts to focus more on QB’ing instead of taking off running then I think he can last and be successful a la a non-scumbag version of Mike Vick. I may not like the guy but I in no way am wishing for him to crash and burn. He’s not a p.o.s and even though the whole religion thing is annoying, not just from him but from any athlete IMO, I want to see the good, hard-working guys succeed in a business where the biggest douche usually gets all the attention lol
by frenchbears113 on Dec 7, 2011 12:59 PM CST up reply actions
Hey french...
I really didn’t ask it to convice anyone about nothing when the subject is Tim Tebow. So don’t take this reply this way. I just want to make some adds on your points. Btw, you made some good ones…
First all, I don’t think it’s fair to compare him with Vince Young. Althought both are great athletes, similarities end there. I think neither Vick would be a fair compare, Tebow is a unique kid… If he will lead the Broncos to a Lombardi Trophy or not, it’s another subject, but the kid is putting Ws in our schedule. The question, for me, is to know how long he can keep doing that.
I agree entirely our D has a big role when talking about our wins. Without keeping the game close, it’s impossible to comeback (althought Tebow also made the 1st down by 15 with 2:44 on the clock comeback of the history). That’s what happened when the Denver Broncos were hammered by the Detroit Lions. However, I’d like to point that we weren’t running this scheme on that game yet.
I don’t think any other player could run an effective spread option offense, but Tebow. As I said, the point for me is to know how long it will last… Thank you for your thoughts, it’s nice to know how “outside” people see this big picture. If any other Bears want to expose your opinions, please do it…
This signature was sacked by Von Miller.
I bleed Orange & Blue.
by Fabio Broncos on Dec 7, 2011 3:47 PM CST up reply actions
Yeah no worries man that's why we're here, to discuss :)
I know a lot of Bears fans who are vocal Tebow supporters and that’s cool. He’s helping get you guys wins and like you and I both said, that’s all that matters. I too question whether or not he can continue to play the way he has for the long-term and with his work-ethic I think he can become a better passer. Good reply my man!
On a non-Tebow related topic and one concerning futures and hypotheticals….. What do you see as the biggest need for you guys next season? I don’t watch the Broncos all that much but I would wager RB. I know McGahee has been playing well but he is 30 with an injury history, Moreno isn’t an every down back and Lance Ball is OK. Is that an accurate assessment?
by frenchbears113 on Dec 7, 2011 4:27 PM CST up reply actions
frenchbears113
sorry fabio for jumpin in but i say 1 RB mcge is like 33 and if denver is going with this off in 12 u need 2 starting RB 2 OT Clady has droped off since 08 and franklin is more a guard type 3 TE we have none by far the wrost group in the NFL 4 A num 2 cb champ couild move to Safety in time C Harris from Kansas not the Safety can start but athoner CB is needed anyway 5 DT we need a space eater a big body to glog the mlddle up and K pater is too hit/miss for my blood oh Back up QB Josh Johnson from Tampa Bay wouild be a Ideal num 2 can do the same stuff tebow can as far as speed opinton
okay i have cerebral palsy arthris and chronic fatigue as well i have a great life and loveing folks some days are better than other days i got a make-a-wish in 2001 and saw my favorite team the broncos it was the trip of a lifetime i wish everyone couild have gotten to enjoy that with me i know some of u hate the broncos and that okay but i bleed organ and bule for my mnr fans but i bleed orange and blue denver will rise again resident broncos fan for every blog resident broncos for stampede bule thanks shvd98z24 real name jeremy woodard nettleton high class of 02 yes i am a raider Stay humble in victory respect all fear none and finish larry soprano
Don't really to sorry, my friend
Welcome to our discussion, j-man… You know I always enjoying reading your thoughts. And I agree with you..
While Franklin would be an awesome LG, I think he improved in pass protection and is doing a good job, besides being a beast pushing to the ground game. Champ Bailey is old and for me he lost a step, althought he is still one of the top CBs of the league. Brodrick Bunkley was a great offseason add and is doing an awesome job as a NT, so when Ty Warren returns from his injury, I think we are ok at this. Marcus Thomas and Ryan McBean are playing at a great level also.
That’s why I think we need another young great RB prospect. Even if Knowshon Moreno wasn’t injured, McGahee doesn’t have much time playing at this level imo. Ball and Johnson are great depth, but without McGahee I don’t think we have a #1 RB type on our roster. I’d love to pull the trigger on Trent Richardson, but he will be gone when we select, so I really don’t know how the front-office will handle this. Maybe LaMichael James, Oregon, can slide to the third and be a great pick to fit our option scheme…
This signature was sacked by Von Miller.
I bleed Orange & Blue.
by Fabio Broncos on Dec 7, 2011 7:16 PM CST up reply actions
Don't *NEED to sorry... my bad here =)
This signature was sacked by Von Miller.
I bleed Orange & Blue.
by Fabio Broncos on Dec 7, 2011 7:17 PM CST up reply actions
A couple points, if I might jump in for a minute
First, Vince Young is a horrible comparison. Vince Young has never had half the heart or drive that Tebow has. He’s never been the leader Tebow is. He’s never worked as hard as Tebow worked. He’s never made those around him better on a consistent basis like Tebow has. And he’s never consistently made plays and won games in the dramatic fashion Tebow has. They both scramble. They’re both athletic. That is where the comparison ends. I’ll end the paragraph by encouraging you to try and find a couple first-round QBs over the last three decades that actually failed, but it has to be a QB that was a terrific leader and had a terrific work ethic to improve. These type of guys don’t fail very often. When you win like Tebow did in college, get taken in the first-round, and also have the work ethic and leadership of TEbow, it’s almost impossible to fail. Let me know what examples you come up with..
Which brings me to point #2. Tim Tebow isn’t a finished product. Look at him in the Miami game. In the Detroit game. And now look at him last week. He’s not a finished product. Nobody thinks he is. First it was that he couldn’t play QB in the NFL. Then it was that he’ll never be a starter. Then it was that he couldn’t win at this level. Then it was that he could never win when he needed to put up 30 points. He couldn’t throw to win. Now it’s that he can’t win in the playoffs. What’s next?
Tebow homers try to act like he’s accurate because of his college stats. He’s not accurate, yet. Tebow haters try to act like he’ll never get better – that we should judge him by what he looks like now. Both are wrong.
Tebow was probably the most raw QB to ever be drafted in the 1st round. He was so good in college that they never needed him to work on his fundamentals. His horrible foot work was a non-issue. He was never asked to read a pro-style defense. He never had to drop back from under center and turn his back to a defense. He never had to learn to make timing throws.
Tebow has the work ethic to fix these fundamentals. The talent is there. The work ethic is there. He’s just never been asked to do it. What he’s doing now, winning all this games in dramatic fshion and improving drastically every week… he’s essentially doing as a rookie. The rawest rookie to ever be drafted so highly.
Folks need to stop acting like he’s a finished product. He’s the first one there, last one to leave and he will literally be sleeping on the couch of the OC and position coach all offseason long. He will get better. And THAT is scary.
DROY is almost an insult to the great Von Miller at this point. Methinks he deserves a back-door pass to the next Victoria's Secret Fashion Show for a chance to sack an Angel - Miranda Kerr, maybe.
I'm of the reverse opinion to ol' frenchie.
I like Tebow a lot. I don’t know how much success he’ll have, but I think he can succeed. And I’m no football purist, so I don’t mind the fact that he plays the game differently than other NFL quarterbacks. In the end, regardless of how you get there, football is about wins.
As much as it pisses people like frenchie off, Tebow does just that. He finds ways to score and he wins ballgames.
I think a lot of people’s problems with him are that he doesn’t fit into the nice neat box of what people expect from a starting NFL quarterback. But the bottom line is this. Technique is taught. talent is not. Tebow has talent but lacks technique. If they can get a real teaccher in there to get his mechanics down, Tebow could be great.
But if the Bronco’s misplay their hand, Tebow will bust, and soon. The Bears have a habit of exposing young quarterbacks to the league and showing the league how to deal with them. I doubt it will be much different with Tim.
But the luck for the Bronco’s and ffor Tebow is that he’s effectively a six-year-old in terms of NFL style quarterbacking. In other words, he is doing what he’s done with very little development. So Tebow has a ton of room to grow and reinvent himself while keeping the athleticism and quirks that have made him successful now.
I think the arrow points up for the Bronco’s young QB.
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Dec 8, 2011 9:09 AM CST up reply actions
Great view, TH
That’s more or less how I realize all this subject too. But le me aks you. If you were in the Broncos front-office and had to plan for the draft. Would you start yet this year building around him, or would you wait another more year? And if you started to do it now, what kind of backup would you look for?
And how do you see this over-talk about Tim Tebow everywhere in mainstream media?
This signature was sacked by Von Miller.
I bleed Orange & Blue.
by Fabio Broncos on Dec 8, 2011 10:46 AM CST up reply actions
Absolutely.
With young quarterbacks, confidence is half of the battle. If you hesitate on building around him, you create doubt in his mind. The front office has to be full-on supportive. Otherwise, the experiment is just a waste of Denver fans’ time. It only extends the suffering to have an extended “tryout” for Tebow.
Additionally, starting to build around Tebow doesn’t restrict the team from going in another direction. He’s a different type of quaterback at this point, but he’s not that drastically different that you need to build the rest of the offense entirely different from what you would need for a more traditional quarterback.
As far as a competent backup? I’d likely keep a guy like Quinn around for just in case purposes. If the experiment fails and Tebow flops, Quinn has a ton of potential that hasn’t been tapped, yet he won’t create a quarterback controversy.
And I tend to feel the majority of the media out there who are being prominently displayed are band-wagon Tebow-Haters who find a easy target in a unconventional player who happens to be openly faithful to a religion that is still acceptable to bash even in our PC society. It’s shameful and substandard journalism and a transparent attempt at a cheap pop.
That doesn’t mean that every article criticizing Tebow is of this type. There are a ton of them that aren’t, in fact. But it seems like they are both the slight minority and overshadowed by the more mean-spirited but attention-getting Tebow-Haters.
Conversely, I also agree with Frenchie that the most prominent Tebow-Defenders seem to act as though his skills are on par with Aaron Rodgers and Tom Brady. While his ratings-drawing skills might just be that big, his football skills are, to this point, not even close.
There are plenty of middle ground opinions out there like mine and Frenchie’s (and the vast majority of the people on sites like this) but they aren’t prominently displayed. Instead the media displays the extremes because it sells, and those overexposed extremes draw passionate fans towards them. That’s my take on the whole media thing.
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Dec 8, 2011 6:59 PM CST up reply actions
Didn't say that it pisses me off. I stated above that I don't care about anyone's delivery or what not but I guess my biggest issue with him is the hype for being an unnatural QB.
The thing is I can respect someone’s opinions about Tebow, whether they’re positive or negative. But to act as if he’s somehow on par with the elite QB’s in the league is ridiculous. Now I know that no one here has made that claim but there are a lot of people who believe that. I for one think that if the guy works on his QB skills, he will last and will be a pretty damn good QB. I may not like the guy but as I stated I am certainly not rooting for him to fail and him winning doesn’t piss me off unless he beats my team lol…which sadly he has a great shot at doing this weekend.
by frenchbears113 on Dec 8, 2011 12:38 PM CST up reply actions
I wasn't insulting you, my friend.
I even understand how you feel. I just see things different.
For example, you’re annoyed with the hype. I’m annoyed with the constant trashing. A lot of his detractors (not saying you) act as though he has no talent and no ability to learn the fundamentals. More-so, they act as though Denver wins in spite of Tebow. It’s all on the defense or the receivers. It’s a fluke. It never has anything to do with Tebow’s talent.
For every one story I find that “hypes” Tebow, I can find five that trash him and seem to actually try to knock the quarterback down. I’m also sick of the constant trashing of his strength of faith. I find it offensive that his faith should somehow be the focus of half the attacks against him and it seems like there is an over-abundance of writers who have personal issues with Tebow on that level and cannot separate that from their “profession” assessment of him.
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Dec 8, 2011 6:39 PM CST up reply actions
No offense taken broseph :)
Tim Tebow is a divisive figure and everyone has their opinion. I do think the guy can get better I just don’t like hearing about how he’s the greatest thing since sliced bread, which he isn’t cuz nothing beats sliced bread. But I do understand your side as well. There are a lot of haters out there who will always be that. There are still people out there who call our beloved Jay Cutler a “wimp” and a “quitter” even though all he does is prove his toughness and that he is a legit top-10 QB. The offensive nosedive has kind of validated that.
But I digress, Tebow is the kind of guy that people shouldn’t hate for trivial reasons. I’m not big on religion myself as it has divided my household. I’m neither Christian enough for my mother nor Jewish enough for my father, although he isn’t much of a Jew himself lol. I’ve been ostracized by both sides for the fact that I belong to neither so I guess that’s why I dislike any athlete constantly praising God but that’s their right just as it’s my right to mute the TV when I hear that stuff.
by frenchbears113 on Dec 8, 2011 8:37 PM CST up reply actions
Why does Kyle Orton suck so bad
"I'm too drunk to taste this chicken" - Colonel Sanders
It's all about THE []_[] baby!!!
~"Smile when u being attacked,laugh when they talking boutcha,wave when they hating on u and Pray when they leave u alone Somethings wrong!"~ Deion Sanders
At least FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER before you judge me fool
Do you really think he does?
I don’t think so. I don’t think he is a Super Bowl caliber QB, but he is a very decent one. He can make some great throws and he is a legit game manager. He could start for half of the franchises right now imo. He is also very professional guy (althought enjoying some Jonnie Walker nights) and even with all the “Tebow stuff” when he was benched, he showed a classy behavior by teaching the new kid.
The problem that makes me don’t want him as the Denver Broncos starting QB is that he is too apathetic and shows no passion or emotion. You add to it the fact that he really struggles against pressure. I mean the both kind of pressures. The pressure the defenses put rushing him with blitz packages (he can’t avoid sacks) AND the pressure to comeback when his team is losing in the 4th quarter.
This signature was sacked by Von Miller.
I bleed Orange & Blue.
by Fabio Broncos on Dec 7, 2011 3:37 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Orton lost a lot of games for the Bears
There where times when all we needed was a QB to make a play, and he simply couldn’t
"I'm too drunk to taste this chicken" - Colonel Sanders
It's all about THE []_[] baby!!!
~"Smile when u being attacked,laugh when they talking boutcha,wave when they hating on u and Pray when they leave u alone Somethings wrong!"~ Deion Sanders
At least FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER before you judge me fool
That's the pressure part... he doesn't handle well with it
This signature was sacked by Von Miller.
I bleed Orange & Blue.
by Fabio Broncos on Dec 7, 2011 7:36 PM CST up reply actions
He's immobile
and something that people rarely look at about him.. He’s injury prone..
And he doesn’t get like huge injuries (sprained MCL, or broken limbs) he gets a lot of tiny injuries that piss me off. Hurt finger? Really?
"I'm too drunk to taste this chicken" - Colonel Sanders
It's all about THE []_[] baby!!!
~"Smile when u being attacked,laugh when they talking boutcha,wave when they hating on u and Pray when they leave u alone Somethings wrong!"~ Deion Sanders
At least FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER before you judge me fool
I can't disagree, SMD
However let me ask you… What do you think about the Bears putting a claim on him off the waivers? Would you like him to start while Cutler is out? Btw, what was the opinion of the most part of your fanbase?
This signature was sacked by Von Miller.
I bleed Orange & Blue.
by Fabio Broncos on Dec 7, 2011 9:03 PM CST up reply actions
I was documenting as stating
If the Bears ever brought Orton back I would be thoroughly pissed off. I have not, and do not like the guy.
"I'm too drunk to taste this chicken" - Colonel Sanders
It's all about THE []_[] baby!!!
~"Smile when u being attacked,laugh when they talking boutcha,wave when they hating on u and Pray when they leave u alone Somethings wrong!"~ Deion Sanders
At least FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER before you judge me fool
If I was in your shoes,
I’d love to have Kyle Orton filling the leak. And when Cutler is back, he would replace Kyle, who would be a great backup.
This signature was sacked by Von Miller.
I bleed Orange & Blue.
by Fabio Broncos on Dec 8, 2011 10:48 AM CST up reply actions
No.
I never want to see neckbeard as a Chicago Bear again.
"I'm too drunk to taste this chicken" - Colonel Sanders
It's all about THE []_[] baby!!!
~"Smile when u being attacked,laugh when they talking boutcha,wave when they hating on u and Pray when they leave u alone Somethings wrong!"~ Deion Sanders
At least FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER before you judge me fool
I agree.
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Dec 8, 2011 6:59 PM CST up reply actions
Zero mobility...
… which limits his ability to improvise when a play goes south. We’ve also seen how a rushing threat from a QB opens things up for McGahee.
Maya: "What are your first impressions of Denver?"
Mozgov: "I must break you..."
Oh yeah, just as a little primer...
Right now, WCGers are basically in the 4th stage of Grief: Depression. We had Denial immediately after the Chargers game, and mostly through last week. Anger probably lasted until about the 1st quarter, when Forte went down. Bargaining was quickly shot down with the mention of The Evil Slacker. So Depression, where we all basically shut down and grieve for what could have been an impressive season.
Acceptance will come probably after this weekend, when we’ll likely move to 7-7, and basically be out of a playoff spot…
NEXT weekend.
The worst we can be this week is 7-6.
Weekend contributor and official editorial lackey/waitstaff at Windy City Gridiron
If a people-avoiding gaming hermit is on Twitter, I should be too. Follow me!
by Steven Schweickert on Dec 7, 2011 3:26 PM CST up reply actions
Right, lol.
No matter how badly the Bears lose, it still only counts as one. But I’m not so sure they lose.
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Dec 8, 2011 9:12 AM CST up reply actions
I can't disagree losing Cutler AND Forte is losing almost the entire offense for any team
But don’t you think you guys have a great D to keep the game close enough?
This signature was sacked by Von Miller.
I bleed Orange & Blue.
by Fabio Broncos on Dec 7, 2011 3:40 PM CST up reply actions
Yes.
But the way the offense played last week, if not for the Hail Mary it could well have been a 3-3 tie.
Hey Fabio! Question for Bears fan...
Why no interest in Brett Farve? He’s old. He sucked the last time he played. Yada, yada, yada. You’re a serious playoff contender two weeks ago. Add a QB two weeks ago and maybe you still would be. Forte is a big loss, but Barber is no slouch. With a real QB, you beat the Chiefs last week, maybe even us on Sunday. Without one, you lost to the Chiefs and don’t look to be able to put up enough points to counteract Tebow Time.
So, why no interest in Farve? Delhomme? Do you blame Lovie for not acting faster? I know he tried for Orton, but is that one effort really good enough?
DROY is almost an insult to the great Von Miller at this point. Methinks he deserves a back-door pass to the next Victoria's Secret Fashion Show for a chance to sack an Angel - Miranda Kerr, maybe.
If you don't believe in the football law that "Favre Shall Never Be a Bear",
then the best answer is he’s got no experience in the Martz system, and there ain’t time to learn.
by oripunk3485 on Dec 7, 2011 5:50 PM CST up reply actions 2 recs
And he'd probably die
playing behind our offensive line.
"Keep pushin' til' it's understood. And these badlands start treating us good."
I can't disagree your OL started poorly
But now, if not the best of the history of the world, they showed some good improvement. The problem of putting Favre behind a bad OL is that we know the huge amount of INTs he throws under pressure…
This signature was sacked by Von Miller.
I bleed Orange & Blue.
by Fabio Broncos on Dec 7, 2011 7:44 PM CST up reply actions
Well, I didn't mean now necessarily
I even said “two weeks ago”. As in, why didn’t you already do it. I’d be mad at my coach in a similar situation. Cutler thinks that Farve would have come in for the right money. I realize the WCO is different and that he’s not used to this system or terminology. Still, Hanie is throwing three picks per game. At least Farve could throw TDs to go along with his picks. Even with his mistakes, Farve at least would be able to put points on the board…. even in a new system.
DROY is almost an insult to the great Von Miller at this point. Methinks he deserves a back-door pass to the next Victoria's Secret Fashion Show for a chance to sack an Angel - Miranda Kerr, maybe.
A couple of things...
To be fair, Hanie threw three picks last week, but two of them were receiver issues and the third was a Hail Mary. Not saying that Hanie is great, but he also screws up enough on his own without being held responsible for his receivers ineptitude.
Additionally, the Williams INT would have been a TD if he would have actually caught the brown thing that hit him in the hands. And another TD was taken away from Hanie by a mental error by Barber.
As to Favre, I’d have no problems seeing Favre in a Bears Jersey…..if he could still play. But the reality of the situation is that, in an offense he knew with players he had a rapport with in Minnesota, he sucked just as badly as Hanie sucks now. With a year added to his age, he isn’t getting any better. Hanie at least has room for improvement. Why would anyone Believe that Favre would ride in and save the Bears when he couldn’t save himself last year?
And, again, I would be the first person to cheer for Favre in a Bears uni if I thought he could help. Hell, I’d love it for no other reason than to see him beat the Packers on Christmas from the Bears end of the field. The look on the Packers fans faces at work would be priceless.
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Dec 8, 2011 9:21 AM CST up reply actions
Re Hanie (and Tebow) That's the way it is with quarterbacks, don't you think.
They get way too much of the blame and receive way too much of the credit for how the game turns out. It is a team game and collectively, the team wins or loses. From the outside, people see three interceptions and think Hanie can’t quarterback. Now you tell us that these int’s aren’t really his fault. I have no reason to doubt you.
But I still like the Broncos’ chances on defense if the Bears are forced to pass. I worry a little more if the Bears use a power running scheme, especially if they’re successful early on. Screens and draws may be effective too. But the Broncos D isn’t the Kansas City D so this could be very important.
On offense, I’m really looking forward to seeing how the Broncos’ running game matches up with that great Bears’ defense and I know the Broncos will run, even if they’re down. I’m not really looking for too many yards rushing in the first half, but as the game wears on I believe it will get more exciting. I know the Bears DB’s are better than those of the injury depleted Vikings so I’m guessing the game may very well turn on whether Tebow can come close to replicating the passing success he had in Minnesota.
Either way, this looks to be a very interesting game.
If this be Hell, let us make the most of it!
by Trinidad Jack on Dec 8, 2011 3:30 PM CST up reply actions
Absolutely.
I agree completely on your take on QBs. Too much blame and too much credit.
As to the Bears passing game against the Broncos, it won’t exist unless Barber and Bell can successfully force your pass rush to hesitate. If the Broncos are allowed to tee off on Hanie the way that the Chiefs were, the Bears are going to have a rough game.
That being said, the Bears run defense is better than advertised and their passing defense is FAR better than the yardage numbers would indicate. If the Bears can capitalize on the turnover situations they create in the way they usually do (but didn’t against KC) then I see a very rough day for Tebow and Co.
Honestly, I could see a game that came down to a ST play or a defensive score that wins. A 9-6 final score wouldn’t surprise me, nor would a 34-31 final score. Both of these teams are very unpredictable at this point.
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Dec 8, 2011 7:08 PM CST up reply actions
"Very unpredictable", I've got to agree with you, Timothy.
If there’s one thing that has always been predictable about the Bears through the years, it’s solid defense. Who wouldn’t love having that Urlacher on their team?! That’s why I’m looking forward to this game. It will be a good measure of how far the Broncos have come, or haven’t come.
Oh and one last little tidbit. I know it’s popular in the main stream media to characterize the Bronco offense as a college, read-option offense, but that couldn’t be farther than the truth. The truth is the Broncos are still running the same offense that McDaniels installed when he was head coach of the Broncos. It’s actually a pretty good offense. The difference is that the O-coordinator has added a read option series to it that the Broncos were reliying on at first to help acclimate Tebow. I wouldn’t be too surprised if you see less and less of it. But I also wouldn’t be surprised if it suddenly pops up again when it is least expected.
But whether it is a shootout or a defensive gem, this game promises to be a fun one to watch. Good luck to the Bears, except, well…, you know. And I pray nobody gets hurt from either team.
If this be Hell, let us make the most of it!
by Trinidad Jack on Dec 9, 2011 8:14 AM CST up reply actions
You are absolutely right about our offense, TJ
And what I’m loving to see on this offense is how our gameplan is being adusted a little week in week out to best fit our opponent. A few plays are taken, others are added, and we are keeping this set very unpredictable.
If we make the playoffs, and I wasn’t expecting this for this year specially after our slow star with Kyle Orton, I think we can make some damage because of this. Lovie Smith is a wise coach, and I’m sure he will mike a clever plan to stop us. If our offense can play well against the Bears, oh then lord is certainly with us =). I’m seeing this game as a key one, because of the great Bears’ defense (as usual). If we can trap Urlacher in our Zone Reads, or burn Tillman and their secondary (including their great pass rushing) with Tebow through the air, then we’ll make a very dangerous football team!
This signature was sacked by Von Miller.
I bleed Orange & Blue.
by Fabio Broncos on Dec 9, 2011 11:07 AM CST up reply actions
Actually, our pass push is pretty mediocre.
But other than that, I agree with you.
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Dec 9, 2011 11:39 AM CST up reply actions
Julius Peppers and Melton
Are always a threat and capable to collapse the pocket and create a lot of pressure.
You guys are the 20th defense in sacks per game, but I still would never underestimate two threats like them, specially the force of nature wearing the #90.
This signature was sacked by Von Miller.
I bleed Orange & Blue.
by Fabio Broncos on Dec 9, 2011 3:19 PM CST up reply actions
?
No….no the Bears are 21st in sacks.
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Dec 10, 2011 2:03 AM CST up reply actions
Weekend contributor and official editorial lackey/waitstaff at Windy City Gridiron
If a people-avoiding gaming hermit is on Twitter, I should be too. Follow me!
by Steven Schweickert on Dec 10, 2011 7:32 AM CST up reply actions
Well 34-31 would shock the heck out of me
I can’t for the life of me figure out how Caleb Hanie is going to put up 31 points. Give Hester a kick return for TD. Give Marion Barber 150 yards and two TDs. And give Hanie 250 yards and a TD. That’s giving everyone an all star day and it’s still not 31 points.
You said the Bears’ defensive rankings for rushing and passing are both misleading. Our pass rush (5th) is misleading. Dumervil has 6.5 sacks on the season and 6.5 in the last five games. He was still hurt early and now on fire. We’re the best pass rushing team in the league over the last six weeks or more. And VonDoom are the best duo in the league. During Tebow’s starts, our defensewas giving up just 16 points per game until Percy Harvin caught us by surprise last week (short chatches in space for two 50-yard TDs). That was without Von MIller.
Our defense is underrated, too. More than any of the general statistics, our situational defense has been on fire with top-ten rankings in most all important categories like getting off the field on third downs. These guys are really good. Other than Percy Harvin carving us up last week while Von Miller was out, this defense has played lights out. I’d bet my own dog that Caleb Hanie can’t put up 20 points on us.
Our Broncos have lost three home games this year while no only division leader has lost more than one. It's time to make Mile High our house again. And it starts Sunday with Caleb Hanie.
we only need about 17 to win
I can’t see denver scoring more than 14 pre.
Hoping that Peppers does the belt dance over Rodgers crumpled on the turf
My point is not to compare the defenses, yours is wine theirs is dirty water
But the Vikings thought the same last week… just saying.
This signature was sacked by Von Miller.
I bleed Orange & Blue.
by Fabio Broncos on Dec 11, 2011 9:03 AM CST up reply actions
I'd get the ride here and make another question
Why not to claim Donovan McNabb also?
I agree Favre could be an option. A good one actually. But while he is very old and sucked in his last year with the Vikes, and he is not playing for some time, McNabb was playing until a couple weeks ago and could be more prepared to step up and bring you guys back to fight for the playoffs. He is an experienced guy and could be a momentarily solution to fill this leak.
This signature was sacked by Von Miller.
I bleed Orange & Blue.
by Fabio Broncos on Dec 7, 2011 7:43 PM CST up reply actions
I don't agree...
Part of what helped the offensive line look better was Cutler’s mobility/Houdini-ism and his quicker release/decision making. Hanie doesn’t have the latter, and he’s not quite sure what to do with the former. Favre might have a bit better passing ability at this point, but he’s got no mobility anymore and we know what an INT machine he can be. McNabb might not have much if anything left in that arm of his. Then even if they brought anybody in, he’d have maybe two or three weeks to learn Martz’s system from the ground up – and hopefully by then the Bears’ playoff chances haven’t evaporated into dust.
At this point, it’s probably best for the Bears to roll with what they’ve got – the “point of no return” so to speak. There just isn’t enough time to bring someone up to speed to keep the playoff hunt alive before Cutler returns.
We made the claim for Orton, then signed McCown immediately – bout the best we could do, sad to say.
Weekend contributor and official editorial lackey/waitstaff at Windy City Gridiron
If a people-avoiding gaming hermit is on Twitter, I should be too. Follow me!
by Steven Schweickert on Dec 7, 2011 7:57 PM CST up reply actions
Sounds like you guys' best chance would be to just play Tebow-Ball on Sunday
Run the ball and stop the run. Don’t take any chances. Go in with the mission that every offensive drive is successful so long as it ends in a kick (whether it’s a PAT, field goal or a punt). Play for field position and/or for Barber to break off a couple runs. Try to get Hester the ball in space like the Vikings did with Harvin last week (two 50 yard TD gains off a three-yard and a ten- yard pass).
If the game gets out of hand, then unleash Hanie and hope he throws a TD before an interception. But until then, just play mistake free football. Easier said than done, but it’s better than giving us three interceptions. That’s how I’d play it. I’d make the Broncos offense score points without the benefit of scoring on defense and getting turnovers. It’ll keep the game close, keep Hanie from getting killed in the pocket (and he will if he has to throw it), and it’ll allow the Bears a chance to win a low scoring game.
DROY is almost an insult to the great Von Miller at this point. Methinks he deserves a back-door pass to the next Victoria's Secret Fashion Show for a chance to sack an Angel - Miranda Kerr, maybe.
If I was Lovie Smith, that's how I'd be gameplaning to beat the Broncos
However, counting solely on Barber isn’t probably enough. If there is a worse moment for a RB injury (Matt Forte), it would be now, when the rushing game would be more needed.
That’s why I really thought the Bears was going to make more effort to land a good QB but only claiming Kyle Orton. They need it. If you can rush the ball effectively, then your QB doesn’t have to be an elite one. But when you lose the (perhaps) best all-purpose h-back in NFL… then you are in trouble without a great QB.
In this big pic, I agree the best chance to the Bears is to keep the scores low (or at least close), just like the Broncos are doing…
This signature was sacked by Von Miller.
I bleed Orange & Blue.
by Fabio Broncos on Dec 8, 2011 10:56 AM CST up reply actions
Yep, and I think I sort of expect them to do that
If they only pass the ball 15 times, they’re unlikely to have a lead, or at least not a big lead. But they’re also less likely to have given our offense 14 points just due to turnovers. It would keep it close where they’ve got at least a “puncher’s chance” to win instead of being behind by 14 in Q4 with an offense that can’t score 14 all game long.
DROY is almost an insult to the great Von Miller at this point. Methinks he deserves a back-door pass to the next Victoria's Secret Fashion Show for a chance to sack an Angel - Miranda Kerr, maybe.
McNabb is probably a better option than Farve
At least he’s in football shape, probably cheaper, too.
DROY is almost an insult to the great Von Miller at this point. Methinks he deserves a back-door pass to the next Victoria's Secret Fashion Show for a chance to sack an Angel - Miranda Kerr, maybe.
He is awful and would struggle picking up the offense
We could have survived the Cutler loss and got in the playoffs but not Cutler and Forte. The defense is playing fantastic right now but unless they start scoring points it doesn’t look good. Although if the Bears score 17 points this week I like their chances of a victory.
Hoping that Peppers does the belt dance over Rodgers crumpled on the turf
The Chiefs game was a Murphy's law game.
Louis allowed five sacks after allowing only one all year. Barber mind-f**ked Hanie out of a TD and Williams butter-fingered him out of another. And Robbie Gould misses a FG. Plus Chiefs get a freak Hail Mary TD off our D, who had the play well in hand.
Without Murphy, that game ends 20-3. I think Bears fans are missing how screwed up the whole scenario really was.
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Dec 8, 2011 9:27 AM CST up reply actions
But let's isolate the options, and think about it in separate.
Who would be better to run your offense if you want to make the playoffs: Hanie, Favre or McNabb?
I’d go with McNabb. Remember it’s a 5-games-solution, not a commitment to the next season. You guys would even have to keep him as a backup.
This signature was sacked by Von Miller.
I bleed Orange & Blue.
by Fabio Broncos on Dec 8, 2011 10:59 AM CST up reply actions
Not to sound like a dickhead Fabio but thats the whole reason that you are wrong with the Mcnabb thing.
Martz’s playbook is hard enough to learn in 2 seasons for a good QB let alone a washed up vet who only has 1 or 2 weeks to learn. Mcnabb, Favre, Orton would have all been just as bad a Hanie. Maybe with a pick or 2 less but we as Bears fans just have to hope for the best with what we have at this point.
Wouldnt it be funny if we had another DE with the last name Salters!
This^
I agree completely. Hanie is the best option the Bears have.
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Dec 8, 2011 7:11 PM CST up reply actions
Of course I don't know the Bears even close of how you guys do it.
But I disagree with you, as an outside view.
Any QB change (including when the 2nd stringer backup steps up for any team) requires an adjusment to the scheme. Always. So why don’t do a 5-games adjust to make the scheme easier for McNabb to run and fight for the playoffs? Hanie is not your future, neither your present… Jay Cutler is. So, without Cutler, I’d make this move to just don’t waste this year because of this pitiful loss.
This signature was sacked by Von Miller.
I bleed Orange & Blue.
by Fabio Broncos on Dec 9, 2011 11:09 AM CST up reply actions
Unfortunately, I disagree.
Hanie has been in the system for two year and knows the offense and the receivers. McNabb knows either and didn’t do well in the last two offenses he DID know with receivers he DID know.
What makes you believe that MvcNabb could do better in Chicago under worse circumstances. I believe the Washington and Minnesota fans made the same arguments before they got to know McNabb.
Second, Hanie isn’t as bad as you and many others are making him sound. He has growing pains coming, but I’d be more confident in him than I would be in McNabb or Favre.
Actually, it kinda fits the Orton, Quinn (who I’m a fan of) Tebow argument. Lot’s of people were scared of Tebow because the devil you know (Orton, Quinn) is better than the devil you don’t (Tebow). Hanie has the ability to et the Bears there. Obviously the coaches believe this, as well, since there is more than enough money sitting around to ink McNabb or Favre through the playoffs.
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Dec 9, 2011 11:45 AM CST up reply actions
Plus McNabb was struggling in basic offenses
in Washington and Minnesota. It was even reported that Shanny had to dumb down the offense for the guy..embarrassing that he is from my high school alma mater.
Hoping that Peppers does the belt dance over Rodgers crumpled on the turf
But so is Hanie, imo.
Ok, he have different views here. But if I don’t like what I see in Hanie (taking of “my” chance to fight for the playoffs) and there is a minimal chance of putting McNabb there (even a 1% chance), I’d do it.
It looks like we are disagreeing about Hanie. You guys don’t think he is doing that bad and the Bears still have a minimal chance to make the playoffs with him, more than with McNabb.
This signature was sacked by Von Miller.
I bleed Orange & Blue.
by Fabio Broncos on Dec 9, 2011 3:25 PM CST up reply actions
He's what it relly boils down to in this disagreement.
We’ve watched McNabb suck for better than two years and Hanie suck for two games. We know McNabb sucks. Hanie’s suckage is questionable while McNabb’s suckage is established. I’d rather take a chance that Hanie’s suckage has been misleading because McNabb can’t get us there.
I think that pretty much sums up my position.
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Dec 10, 2011 2:08 AM CST up reply actions
Yes, you have a solid point and make sense on it.
If I had the same point, I’d think the same…
This signature was sacked by Von Miller.
I bleed Orange & Blue.
by Fabio Broncos on Dec 10, 2011 7:22 AM CST up reply actions
no disagreement. about hanie, he sucks
But at least he has some potential to execute some plays unlike a guy coming in here not knowing the offense or where the receivers will be.
Hoping that Peppers does the belt dance over Rodgers crumpled on the turf
McNabb has disappointed fans in two cities .....
in the last two season in offenses he understood. Why make it three. I truly like and respect McNabb and I hope he retires and preserves what’s left of his legacy.
Truth is, Hanie, who has been in the system for two years, gives the Bears a better chance to win than Favre or McNabb and stands a better chance of getting his feet under him than any QB out there coming into this system that has to learn it on the fly.
The exceptions to those rules would be Kurt Warner and Marc Bulger. And Bulger would probably die on the field behind this line, and that’s if he can remember where he is to start with.
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Dec 8, 2011 9:24 AM CST up reply actions
I replied above, Timmy
about a scheme adjustement when replacing the starting QB for any team.
This signature was sacked by Von Miller.
I bleed Orange & Blue.
by Fabio Broncos on Dec 9, 2011 11:11 AM CST up reply actions
And i agree, to a point.
But You’re talking apples and oranges. For Hanie the playbook had to be limited a bit. For McNabb it would have to be scrapped. He’s not a timing quarterback and he has no knownledge of the terminology. Not to mention he has no rapport with the receivers and know relationship to build instinct off of the line. There’s far more to making a QB switch than limiting a playbook, especially when you bring in an outside player with no experience in the system.
And none of that addresses the fact that the last two fanbases that thought McNabb was better than their other options ended up wathcing McNabb sit as they started Rex Grossman and Christian Ponder over him. Me thinks fans have overestimated McNabb for the last two years. (actually, as much as I like the guy and think he’s a class act, I think he’s been overrated his entire career. But the last two years were different. He was still a good quarterback before then, just overrated. Now he’s a poor excuse for a QB).
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Dec 9, 2011 11:49 AM CST up reply actions
Favre is old and bad at football.....
and McNabb is fat and bad at football.
by Ortons Neckbeard on Dec 8, 2011 10:11 AM CST up reply actions
Backup quarterbacks
The difference between the Bears and the Broncos:
Putting a square peg into a round hole:
The Bears with Hanie and the Broncos eschewing that with Tebow.
Thorough breakdown of Broncos here...
http://www.itsalloverfatman.com/broncos/entry/you-got-served-digesting-the-broncos
Maya: "What are your first impressions of Denver?"
Mozgov: "I must break you..."
Wow... a complete and great article about our team.
This signature was sacked by Von Miller.
I bleed Orange & Blue.
by Fabio Broncos on Dec 9, 2011 11:41 AM CST up reply actions
One Question
Is Von Miller playing on Sunday? Is he practicing with that thumb?
White Sox fans need not apply.
by Bears-Cubs Bulls on Dec 9, 2011 12:55 PM CST up reply actions
Just heard on the sports radio that Von probable
Willis McGahee as questionable (but he’s vowing to play).
Maya: "What are your first impressions of Denver?"
Mozgov: "I must break you..."
That's it, margabelle
I read somewhere these days he just didn’t play the Vikes because of a medical care to prevent any possible damage to his thumb.
I’d be very surprised if he missed our sunday matchup.
This signature was sacked by Von Miller.
I bleed Orange & Blue.
by Fabio Broncos on Dec 9, 2011 3:20 PM CST up reply actions
Not damage, but prevent infection
on his surgical wound from the sweat of those syphillis-ridden Vikings.
Maya: "What are your first impressions of Denver?"
Mozgov: "I must break you..."
That's it
Nothing better than a great memory. Mine is not that good… never had been lol
This signature was sacked by Von Miller.
I bleed Orange & Blue.
by Fabio Broncos on Dec 9, 2011 3:27 PM CST up reply actions
It's All Over, Fat Man is run by some distinquished MHR alums.
In my opinion they are knowledgable and fair.
If this be Hell, let us make the most of it!
by Trinidad Jack on Dec 9, 2011 7:30 PM CST up reply actions
Question for the Bears fans?
Watching the Bears vs Chiefs game Sunday (Sunday Ticket) I noticed Julius Peppers go out of the game and to the locker room. What was the nature of that? And is he 100% this week since I haven’t seen him on the injury list?
The most valuable possession you can own is an open heart. The most powerful weapon you can be is an instrument of peace.
Carlos Santana
He's been nagged all season...
by some minor injuries. But he’ll be ready to go Sunday and wasn’t on the injury report.
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Dec 10, 2011 2:10 AM CST up reply actions
The comment below was supposed to be this reply.
This signature was sacked by Von Miller.
I bleed Orange & Blue.
by Fabio Broncos on Dec 10, 2011 7:21 AM CST up reply actions
Julius Peppers
If he is going to the game it’s the worst news great for news you. He is the Bears’ weapon I fear the most, however I think John Fox knows everything about this beast. He is supposed to know deep about his techniques, his best moves, his skills and specially how to counter him. I know KNOWHOW is much different from EXECUTION, but I have to hope on something right?
This signature was sacked by Von Miller.
I bleed Orange & Blue.
- We use him differently from Carolina*, he aligns all over, he is probably the most complete DE on a 4-3 defense in the game. We will conain Timmy with Lach and Briggs, look for him on the field, they are embarrassed by that loss on Sunday, so they will show up.
by transylvanian bear on Dec 10, 2011 8:50 AM CST reply actions
Peps will get double teamed, everybody does.
by transylvanian bear on Dec 10, 2011 8:52 AM CST reply actions

by 





















