2011 Chicago Bears Roster Turnover: Wide Receiver
The Bears need to add a wide receiver to the roster for 2011. Not just a camp body, not just some guy to be in the mix, but a player that can make an impact. In my opinion, adding a former CFL star isn't enough. Expect another free agent to come in or a rookie to be drafted, or maybe both.
This is the final offensive position in my series looking at potential roster changes for next season, and next week I'll hit on the specialists and get started on the defense. Be sure to check out all our Roster Analysis stuff, as we at Windy City Gridiron have a slew of talented writers to choose from.
Johnny Knox - signed through 2012 - Knox improved from his rookie season, but he still has a ways to go before he's a polished NFL receiver. He was used much differently in 2010 under Mike Martz, as Martz took advantage of his speed. He only improved his reception total by 6, but his yards increased by 433, and his average per reception was 5th in the league at 18.8. He is a fast man. Now let's work on always finishing routes, fighting for the ball, and blocking. I'm not ready to write him off, as his weaknesses are coachable, but he needs a good off season spent in the weight room and the film room to take that next step as a receiver.
Pro Football Focus had Knox finishing up the 2010 regular season with a neutral -0.6 grade, good for 51st in the NFL. He was just above Jeremy Maclin and 1 below Steve Johnson. It's been written here on more than one occasion that a bunch of Jay Cutler's interceptions were on throws to Knox (11 according to PFF), and also according to PFF Knox caught 52.6% of the passes thrown his way, good for 88th in the league. This percentage has to improve.
Devin Hester - signed through 2013 - I think as the year progressed, and the Bears started to take away some of Devin's offensive snaps, he became a better football player. Hester has improved every year as a receiver, but I think his biggest asset to the Bears is as a full time returner and a part time offensive player.
PFF had him as the 98th rated WR, which is obviously not very good, but Hester is the kind of explosive talent that teams have to be aware of and the kind of player that teams have to game plan against. Every time Hester enters an offensive huddle, defensive coordinators make that fact aware to his defense.
Earl Bennett - signed through 2011 - Bennett is just a solid NFL receiver. His best position may be in the slot, but I think he can be a starter for the Bears. Even though he isn't the biggest (6' 209), he shows a willingness to attack the ball in the air. Had the start to his season not been slowed by injury, he may have led the team in receptions. PFF had him rated as the best WR on the Bears roster by a wide margin, and 17th best overall. Not one aspect of his game garnered a negative rating, in fact he didn't score in the negative in any game for the entire season. Solid.
Rashied Davis - free agent - I'm in the minority, but I think Davis has been a good player for the Bears. For what he is, a 5th WR, he filled his role perfectly. Perform when called on, and play good special teams. With that being said, I don't think he'll return to the Bears.
Devin Aromashodu - restricted free agent - He may be a restricted free agent, but I don't think the Bears want to keep him around. After a promising end to his 2009 season, most fans predicted big things from the "Extrapolation Sensation", but he couldn't get on the field to live up to that promise. PFF had him catching 10 of the 21 balls thrown his way (47.6%), not very good... He's gone.
Andy Fantuz - signed a reserve/future contract - Fantuz just might be a legit NFL talent, but until the real games are played, that will remain a mystery. He'll make some spectacular catches in mini camp, and he'll no doubt shine in preseason playing against future stock traders, personal trainers, and line cooks. I'm sure his fan club will be in full swing by August, organized by the past fan club presidents of Brandon Rideau, Mike Haas, and Ahmed Meritt. I think Fantuz will definitely be around next year in some capacity (final roster, IR, or the practice squad), but for fans to expect him to be that go up and get it true #1 receiver before we even see him on the field is a bit premature.
Onrea Jones - signed a reserve/future contract - Who? The Bears are his eighth organization according to his Wiki page. He's a former Virginia state High School champion in the hurdles and the 4X100 relay, so he must have some speed. He's had 22 preseason receptions the last 3 years, but has none when games count. He's a warm camp body and a practice squad possibility.
2011 OUTLOOK - Someone has to step up and establish themselves as the #1 receiver. Whether a draft choice, a free agent, or someone already on the roster, Jay Cutler needs that guy. Drafting a receiver will happen at some point, maybe even as early as the 2nd round. I think year 2 of the Martz offense will find the passing game running more efficiently, but it will only go so far without an actual upgrade in talent.
Some posible free agents are James Jones, Mike Sims-Walker, Braylon Edwards, Plaxico Burress... I just don't see that #1 guy out there in free agency.
43 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I don't think I see anything in here I disagree with.
I’d just like to add that I view Rashied Davis as being a less talented Earl Bennett. They both basically fill the same role as a possession slot type receiver, but Bennett is simply better than Davis in virtually every possible aspect on offense that I can think of. As a #2 slot guy and ST contributor, I see Davis being a solid player and I kinda hope he finishes his career with the Bears.
I also kinda view Hester and Knox very similarly. They are both speedsters who make their living on YAC and on beating their opponents to the ball laterally rather than vertically. They much prefer to get the ball in space, rather than fighting for it. It’s what makes them both so good between the 20s, and both so bad in the red zone.
For the most part, I’m content with what the Bears have at the WR position. They’ve got 3 #2s (and possibly more), and can spread the ball quite well when they want to. I’m less concerned with our WR situation than I am with a couple other areas of this team (OL, DT, CB). If we stay pat with what we had last year, and improve our blocking while continuing to emphasize run/pass balance with a healthy Matt Forte, we won’t be world-beaters on offense, but we’ll be solid.
The issue here is that it seems that none of the receivers want to step and snag the #1 role
and I may be wrong on this but I feel that Knox is content on just being the default number 1 guy and has not actively tried to better himself in his route-running, strength and just overall performance IMO. He needs to bulk up a bit and learn to fight for those nearly catchable throws which he doesn’t do like Bennett or Olsen. The Bears need a big body for Jay because he tends to under and over throw and plus most bigger receivers tend to be very physical. If the Bears get that type of receiver then Knox can be a great #2 and a scary one at that. Receiver is a bigger need than a DT IMO, especially if this offense is to improve.
by frenchbears113 on Feb 17, 2011 12:11 PM CST up reply actions
Once again, I point to my theory on offensive lines...
A bad offensive line reduces the grade of every single offensive skill player by 1 letter grade. So, a B ranked WR unit becomes C-ranked.
A league average offensive line is neutral on the grade of every offensive skill player.
A great offensive line increases the grade of every single offensive skill player by 1 letter grade. So a B ranked WR unit becomes A-ranked.
I believe that you could rank the Bears WR core this past year as being a C or C+ overall.
I don’t think that anybody will disagree with an F ranking for our offensive line.
What would happen if our line became C ranked? B ranked?
IMO, the pieces are in place for the offensive skill positions. We’ve got a gunslinger QB that can read defenses reasonably when he’s got time. We’ve got a borderline ProBowl RB that isn’t a league leader in any single aspect of his job, but is probably top 10 at every individual aspect of his job (very few RBs can say that). We’ve got two undersized speedsters with reasonable hands and questions about both toughness and smarts at WR. We’ve got two spectacular route runners with fantastic hands who are undersized and not particularly fast (though also not particularly slow). We’ve also got one of the better pass-catching big TEs in the league who is learning how to block correctly, and another big youngster pass-catching TE that at times looks lost on the field.
On the other hand, we’ve basically got league-average DTs and only one CB that can actually do some damage.
OT is our biggest need. You can make an argument that WR, DT, and CB are all roughly the same in terms of need. I simply believe that the order is CB, DT, WR out of those position groups. I would not be particularly upset if we had 20 OL in training camp all battling for their jobs on this team, even if it means we run with exactly the same offensive personnel at every other position (aside from Manu, who should be cut immediately).
well I do agree about the oline being the most important position to upgrade....
but I don’t believe that the receivers we have are that great although I feel that if given the chance Earl can be the #1 guy because he has all the traits of being a go to guy asides from the speed and I don’t think he’s that slow. He reminds me of Hines Ward but I do believe that Knox has the tools to be the guy he just needs to improve his strength and route running and in all honesty I hope I’m wrong in the assessment of the receivers but until Knox and Hester can bang with the big boys I just cant see them being solutions to the problem. But Jay has the skills to make the receivers better if his line can protect him so I agree about the line being the key part of the puzzle. And yes Manu should be cut. I think the offense would’ve been so much better had they used Dez Clark.
by frenchbears113 on Feb 17, 2011 3:45 PM CST up reply actions
I haven't really been following this
So forgive the stupid question, but is there 0 chance we could get Larry Fitzgerald? Did Arizona franchise him and I missed the report?
Lisa needs braces ... DENTAL PLAN
I haven't heard anything on this...
But Arizona was consulting Fitz about who he wants as QB, pressumably meaning that the club will do what it takes to keep him around.
E.F.K.
Jim Carrey accent? Maybe we could write Arizona some IOUs for draft picks in exchange for Fitz
E.F.K.
Randomly decided to watch that again last night.
What a classic.
WILDCARD BITCHES!!! YEEEEHHHAAAAA!!!!!
I agree with most of what you said...
Except I think Knox is pretty good at blocking for a small guy. On a lot of Forte and Olsen’s big gains Knox was downfield jamming his guy up. Preferably, Knox would be a quick slot receiver, but given the Bears WR corps, I think he needs a big body to line up opposite him outside the numbers. Concerning Hester, and presuming we get a big-bodied WR, I would prefer to only see Hester come in on 4 receiver sets and be saved for PR/KR duties.
Additionally, I wonder, and it’s a big IF, if Cutler is given more time in the pocket if our WRs would improve a lot even if we didn’t add a big target. I think with our small receivers and with Cutler being pressured he was forced into some throws and clearly our receivers, except for Bennett, aren’t the “fight for the ball” type.
Ideally, add a big bodied WR on the outside, and add three O Lineman who know the value of pass blocking. (Hopefully add at least one through FA) I think the Bears would add interior help at LG, RG, and maybe bring in a C to groom behind Kreutz, shift Webb to LT (even though I think he is too slow with his footwork to re-route fast rushers e.g. Clay Matthews, Kyle VandenBosch etc.) and move C Williams to RT.
E.F.K.
I noticed Knox blocking adequately at times too
PFF rated his blocking negatively, and it is something he still needs to improve on.
If you go in the bathroom, turn off the lights, and say "Da Coach" 5 times while facing the mirror... Ditka will appear and slap the wussy right out of you.
by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Feb 17, 2011 12:12 PM CST up reply actions
You know who sucks at downfield blocking?
Hester. One of the indellible images from this season is watching the replays of big gainers by Forte, or Olsen or Knox coming across the middle and turning up field, only to see Hester blow the block that could’ve turned a nice gain into 6 points.
Another is Forte taking bad angles in the open field, but that’s another post for another day.
Lisa needs braces ... DENTAL PLAN
Hester has improved as a blocker every year
He still needs some work though
If you go in the bathroom, turn off the lights, and say "Da Coach" 5 times while facing the mirror... Ditka will appear and slap the wussy right out of you.
by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Feb 17, 2011 12:21 PM CST up reply actions
I think we'd do better...
But the whole issue is where does Cutler go when the pressure is on? If the line improves, the question comes up less, but the answer right now would be the same. We would be better with a better line, but we still couldn’t maximize Cutler’s abilities unless we got him a guy who can go get the catchable, but high, passes he throws under pressure. Until then, its 14+ picks a year and a laundry list of missed opportunities. The receiver doesn’t have to be 6’3" or taller, he just has to be able to go get the football at its highest point, catch with his hands consistently and control the space around him
"just as Gary Fencik will go down as the last person to catch a Joe Namath pass, Wootton will be remembered in NFL history as the last player to sack Brett Favre." - John "Moon" Mullin
by Brendan Hess on Feb 17, 2011 12:54 PM CST up reply actions
Ideally...
Yes, we would be much better off if we could find one or two big bodies for Cutler. I also think Cutler working on his mechanics for his throws inside the pocket would obviously (IMHO) help a lot with his accuracy. Hopefully there isn’t a lockout, because I think right now Martz and Cutler need to work on fundamentals this off-season more than ever (now that the playbook has been around for a year).
E.F.K.
great point
The receiver doesn’t have to be 6’3" or taller, he just has to be able to go get the football at its highest point, catch with his hands consistently and control the space around him
If you go in the bathroom, turn off the lights, and say "Da Coach" 5 times while facing the mirror... Ditka will appear and slap the wussy right out of you.
by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Feb 17, 2011 1:33 PM CST up reply actions
It’s a shame Kellen Davis hardly had a pass thrown to him all year, and Olsen disappeared as a receiving option for long stretches.
Acreman20: 127 hours is pretty decent.
awfullyquiet: How long is that movie?
Acreman20: 93 minutes.
~~~ Check my profile for links for SB20 and America's Game: '85 Bears ~~~
This was all because Mike Martz traditionally uses his TEs to block in his system
It was later in the year when he reconsidered
Erik Duerrwaecter
by Erik Christopher Duerrwaechter on Feb 17, 2011 5:55 PM CST up reply actions
Hey Lester
Before I take a quick break from WCG, I was wondering what your thoughts were on if we acquired a speedy WR but who was an impeccable route runner. I mean the Greatest Show on Turf didn’t really have any huge WRs, they were all just great at running routes, something I think is sadly missing from this WR corps. Do you think with another year in the same system Knox etc. will drastically improve their route running?
E.F.K.
I think Knox could take that next jump
but a big difference between those Rams teams and this Martzfense is the turf. You can have a bunch of precise route runners if you play half your games on carpet, but in Chicago I think you need at least 1 physical presence to compliment the speed WRs
If you go in the bathroom, turn off the lights, and say "Da Coach" 5 times while facing the mirror... Ditka will appear and slap the wussy right out of you.
by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Feb 17, 2011 12:27 PM CST up reply actions
Good point.
I think turf, or at least partial turf like they have at Lambeau, would greatly help our D and WRs. The only reason why I quietly liked the slop at Soldier Field this year is because it helped our O Line with the pass rush.
E.F.K.
I like how the coaching staff used Hester this past year
bringing him in only for certain packages. He didn’t get a lot of receptions, but he seemed to be efficient with his playing time – meaning he made the most out of his reduced snaps. I’d say keep that mix going.
by NorthSideBearsFan on Feb 17, 2011 12:53 PM CST reply actions
I'm interested to see what we have in Fantuz...
Looking at video on Youtube from a bunch of different games…they guy looks like he could be very good for us…then again it was a JA move!
Unreasonable people make life difficult...
If he is the real deal;
problem solved
If you go in the bathroom, turn off the lights, and say "Da Coach" 5 times while facing the mirror... Ditka will appear and slap the wussy right out of you.
by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Feb 17, 2011 1:45 PM CST up reply actions
What does everyone think about getting Jones, Sims-Walker, Edwards, or Burress?
I’m not particularly thrilled with any of the FA WRs out there (especially now since Vince Jackson got tagged), though I think they might be decent upgrades. What about the FA options available?
by NorthSideBearsFan on Feb 17, 2011 12:59 PM CST reply actions
Has Sidney Rice been tagged?
I would think Frazier, being a defensive minded coach, would tag Greenway instead. But who knows. In terms of your choices, I’d say Jones, but he does have butterfingers at times. He also seems to possess a lot of potential.
E.F.K.
he hasn't
But I think they keep Rice in Minnesota, even if it means cutting Berrian
If you go in the bathroom, turn off the lights, and say "Da Coach" 5 times while facing the mirror... Ditka will appear and slap the wussy right out of you.
by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Feb 17, 2011 1:35 PM CST up reply actions
I forgot about Rice
If he was available, I wouldn’t mind seeing him in a Bears uniform. However, I’m a little concerned that he’s basically only had one really good season in his career…..
by NorthSideBearsFan on Feb 17, 2011 1:52 PM CST up reply actions
Well
Considering a 39 yr. old Brett Favre has been his best QB so far in his career and he only played in six games last year I’d give him a break. DN seems to think they’ll tag Greenway and either try to ink Rice to a long-term deal or let him walk. He turns 25 in September and could be exactly what Da Bears need at the receiver position. I’m not as worried about his hip as many others around here are.
WILDCARD BITCHES!!! YEEEEHHHAAAAA!!!!!
That's still one good season more than most Bears WR's
Unreasonable people make life difficult...
by WisBearsFan34 on Feb 17, 2011 2:22 PM CST up reply actions
Sad but true
To paraphrase Biggs: “The legend of Marty Booker looms large”
by NorthSideBearsFan on Feb 17, 2011 2:54 PM CST up reply actions
Rice would be fantastic...
however, I just don’t see the Vikes letting him go, especially to us…
I’d like to see MSW but that’s just me…
Unreasonable people make life difficult...
by WisBearsFan34 on Feb 17, 2011 1:12 PM CST up reply actions
I wouldnt be dissapointed with MSW
Jones is to incosistent and Braylon is at best a #2.
by IndyBearsFan88 on Feb 17, 2011 1:19 PM CST up reply actions
I wouldn't mind Sims-Walker
He’s got size and he hasn’t worked with a great QB, only a mediocre one. I would take him over a head case like Edwards or Plax or a guy with the droppsies like Jones.
Jay Cutler is still my quarterback.
by Sam Householder on Feb 17, 2011 1:44 PM CST up reply actions
No on Edwards.
If you think that Aroma dropped passes, you don’t know nothing. Edwards is the KING of the dropped pass. I daresay that I’ve seen some of his pass drops that were more spectacular in their suckiness than many a fantastic catch has been in their awesomeness. And I’m including his college career here. I never understood the fascination with this guy, and I seriously hope the Bears never consider him for this team.
Malcolm Floyd becomes a good option w Jackson getting tagged.
I would think San Diego won’t give both guys huge contracts. The downside to Floyd is he’s already 29 and had a bad hammy last season.
by Mike Mueller on Feb 17, 2011 4:26 PM CST up reply actions
I like Jones, Edwards, Burress, and Rice...
Rice would probably be the best Idea. Burress is not a sure thing since he has been out of the game for a while but he should be able to get back into it pretty quickly if he is in any kind of shape. Vick did it so I cant see it being that hard for a receiver. Jones is still young and I don’t think would help out the team too much but is a solid young developing talent. Edwards had some great catches this season but I’m on the line with him. I wouldn’t mind seeing a trade for him but also wouldn’t mind if he went somewhere else. I want Fitz when he becomes available. TO and Ocho might be on the market too if i read correctly so we will see what we do. I would love to see Chad in a bears jersey. TO not so much.
by Jonathan Heun Jr on Feb 18, 2011 2:11 AM CST up reply actions
I think if they go the FA route for a receiver he needs to be a good route runner first because in this offense
what good is a big receiver if he doesn’t go where he’s supposed to? Any receiver this team signs or drafts will need to be a solid route runner in order to excel and to not be given the DA treatment
by frenchbears113 on Feb 18, 2011 10:03 AM CST up reply actions
I would like our OL and a new DT drafted
before we even begin considering working on our receiver issues. Matt Forte will be amazing with a good OL, and we can run the football pretty well. Our passing game isn’t terrible, and if we can SOMEHOW manage to become a run first team again, I think we will be a very successful franchise given what we have. We should pass to Run not run to pass. Matt Forte was a beast this year.
We need help at DT to be a fantastic Defense. Toeiana and Adams were servicable, but there was no big play capability from them. At 29, I’d be comfortable with the Bears going for a surefire DT if a surefire OL isn’t there. I just don’t think we can afford to miss on our first rounder again. I’m ready to call CW a bust. You don’t draft a LT to get a Guard. You just don’t pay that kind of money for that. I hope we get a decent Guard out of him and don’t DMS him.
Help at corner would also make our defense better. Getting somebody legit to start opposite Tillman and allow some spelling to occur in our backfield will keep us fresh and fast and make our backfield much stronger. Addressing DT and CB would fill the only holes our defense has, and I’d be surprised to see any opponent post more than fourteen points at any point if those are addressed. I think our offense can manage more 17 with a good OL. WR can wait.
Depth at CB, Legit DT, Legit OL. These are our needs. WR is a want.
by MidwayMonster55 on Feb 18, 2011 12:49 AM CST reply actions
I would love to see a veteran receiver added to this group.
I think what we miss with this group is the lack of a pure wide out with no limitations. It seems our wideouts have a glaring limitation that opposing corners exploit.
by Dominique Blanton on Feb 18, 2011 1:24 AM CST via mobile reply actions

by 
























