Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: NFL Players Ready To Welcome Gay Teammate

Some popular online sports streaming websites have been shut down (ATDHE, channelsurfing.net and others) by the US gov't.

The article ties it to the upcoming superbowl this Sunday, but that makes me wonder what good it would do: The game is broadcast freely on Fox in the United States, and outside the US, the feds can't block the websites anyway (can they?). Apparently, some mirror sites have already popped up with other URL extensions.

I confess i've used those sites when a Bears game wasn't shown in my area...yet I know they don't have the NFL's consent...

Check out the full article.

over 1 year ago Screamapillar_square_tiny juperee 8 comments 0 recs  | 

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Crap, ATDHE was just too easy

I knew this was coming, sad that the modern sport leagues can’t seem to understand that people want to watch out of market games and direct TV isn’t an option for everyone. I just don’t have $200 dollars extra to spend on cable on top of the normal cost. Not to mention when I am not at home I want to watch these games and I can’t legally.
Just as I-Tunes proved, give people a chance to buy it legally for a few dollars and they will. There is literally millions of dollars in revenues being left on the table currently because the powers that be are so quick to protect the current revenue streams that any new media outlets are completely locked out of the party. So they will continue to play wack-a-mole shutting down streaming system after system ignoring the big picture.
Pandora’s box is open, cannot be shut, sorry.

White Sox fans need not apply.

by Bears-Cubs Bulls on Feb 2, 2011 5:59 PM CST reply actions   1 recs

it is $300

DirecTv’s sunday ticket is $300/year.

That works out to about 10 Bears games that I couldn’t otherwise see (about 5 or 6 a year appear on national tv). That is $30 per Bears game!!!

I’ve paid this the last 2 seasons, but I’m seriously considering dropping it in the future.

by MakeHalasProud on Feb 4, 2011 6:18 PM CST up reply actions  

Quite frankly, its the sports' fault that these streaming sites are so popular.

I mean, it’s not like it’s particularly difficult to create a low quality stream of television. CAn be done on just about any modern server. So why don’t the sport associations stream their own games on their own websites?

IMO, they’re missing out on a fantastic (and as of yet untapped) profit potential by cutting out the middleman (the networks) and having advertisers go directly through them for game stoppage advertisement. The only downside is that we get to skip the announcers. Downside? I meant upside.

The various sporting leagues already have a model in place that they can use for streaming. It’s called regular television. Same thin, just in lower quality. Offer it with advertisements for free, or charge something decent (say, $30/year?) for games without advertisements. Either way, you’re going to get either the advertising dollars, or the subscription dollars. Considering the millions that are probably streaming each game every time it’s played, that’s a ton of profit that’s quite simply untapped.

And the leagues say that they hire business consultants. These guys haven’t graduated from the 80s in their ability to promote and adequately broadcast their sport. The internet exists, fellas. And it’s here to stay. Hop on board, or get out of our freaking way!

by Doshi on Feb 2, 2011 8:36 PM CST reply actions  

I dont see the problem

If this was really hindering profits from people legitamitly viewing the games why were viewer ratings sky high this year? Why did it seem like every monday and sunday night they would say this is the most highly viewed game in a while??? Am I confused with this. The only time I would watch the games on these sites is when they are not on in the local area I am in. I move around alot and am in DC right now so watching the Bears is a pain in the arse. If the Redskins are on that will be the only game they show out here. Nothing will be on CBS. They will blackout all other games and force you to watch that sorry excuse for a team to play.

I also refuse to pay 50+ dollars a month for the NFL packages and all that crap. Too much money for too little. I only want to watch the Bears on a weekly basis. I cannot justify 50 dollars a month for 4 games of 3hrs a piece. That is over 10 bucks a game.

Why not have a package where you can order the game you want for like a dollar or 2 just for that game?

VIVA LA RESISTANCE!

by Jonathan Heun Jr on Feb 3, 2011 12:45 AM CST reply actions  

Ah yes a micropayment system

This idea has been kicked around for almost a decade now with no real implementation with the exception of Itunes .99 cent downloads. It took Apple years and declining CD revenue model to convince main stream music of this, and they went kicking and screaming. Fast forward 4 years and its the Apple is the largest music retailer on the planet.
Sports will not even consider Internet streaming and micropayments until people stop watching the network broadcasts and their traditional revenue streams become threatened.
So dont expect anything sane from these people on this as long as CBS and FOX are paying 100s of millions of dollars per week for games.

White Sox fans need not apply.

by Bears-Cubs Bulls on Feb 3, 2011 2:10 PM CST up reply actions  

But CBS and Fox cover only the local teams...

And whatever other games THEY think people want to watch. They’re often wrong.

Having a reasonable quality stream available for on-demand viewing would work out well, I think. The majority of folks would still watch the broadcast TV, and they’d get extra revenue from the rest of us. Heck, I already subscribe to AudioPass so I can at least LISTEN live to the Bears.

Jay Cutler is our quarterback, baby! Please pass the nitroglycerin tablets.

by juperee on Feb 3, 2011 6:30 PM CST up reply actions  

I think they seriously underestimate those of us who'll never pay for cable

I have cable internet with the basic basic TV package (basically, only the broadcast channels plus CSPAN).

I’d love to have full access to NFL games, but won’t get a big cable package for two reasons:

1) Cost.
2) I know my family (including husband and kids) would become useless couch potatoes all year round. Three hundred channels of the scum of the earth is not what I want in my living room.

And 2) is more important than 1) to me.

Jay Cutler is our quarterback, baby! Please pass the nitroglycerin tablets.

by juperee on Feb 3, 2011 6:33 PM CST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Windy City Gridiron is the best independent site on the internet for breaking news, in-depth analysis, and hardcore discussion about the Chicago Bears

Community Guidelines

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Images-8_small
Why the Offensive Line will be fine.

Recent FanPosts

029_small
Solving a Crisis: Redzone Edition
Windycityflyer_small
SMD's Bottom 5
Images-8_small
Yahoo Fantasy Football Sign-up. Need contact info soon
Small
We may not know DT Nate Collins but the Chicago Bears do.
029_small
Is it time for a contract? Oh no, not another Matt Forte post...
Burlacher2_small
Is Winning Games a Specialty?
Burlacher2_small
Apparently, Defense Wins Championships...
Fox_small
Bad start for AJ Jenkins
Burlacher2_small
What's It Take to Win?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Windycity_small Adam T

189886_210123485665309_100000029768895_888721_5830650_n__1__small Dane Noble

Editors

Sackwatchcutler_small Lester A. Wiltfong Jr.

535321_3734130120778_1501804679_3253247_588486681_n_small David Taylor

Orange_shy_guy_small Steven Schweickert

Capture_small Kev H

Contributing Writers

Lincoln_small Sam Householder

Leprechaun_small Spongie

Polishsausage_small Steve Ronkowski

Icothgmts_small T.J. Shouse

Joe_20mantegna-bill_20swerski_small Superfans

P981d5c2_reasonably_small_small DaveGilbertNFL